Religions > Bible > Re: DAVE (PASTOR DAVE, Azaliah, Giantwaffle, Ananias917, AD70) attempts debate with illogic and assumption
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Azaliah" |
| Date: |
03 Dec 2006 02:17:19 PM |
| Object: |
Re: DAVE (PASTOR DAVE, Azaliah, Giantwaffle, Ananias917, AD70) attempts debate with illogic and assumption |
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 10:53:45 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Dave, I am not even interested in exchanging posts with you,
And yet, you come into every thread I'm in, attacking me
and then running away. That's cowardice.
as I have witnessed your "debates" with Chuck Stamford,
Randy and others.... what an exercise in futility -- sheer idiocy!
I know that you don't like it when people disagree with you.
The truth is, since you do as I said above, it is you who is
being idiotic.
Besides this, the rules were to be as follows:
1) No insults. No personal attacks. That includes ceasing
any and all hostilities while the debate continues.
2) Each point must be dealt with specifically.
3) The Bible is the final judge.
4) No running away.
5) No starting any new threads about the subject. We deal
with the subject in the thread that we are debating it in.
6) If one of us cannot dispute a point, we must admit it.
7) A victor will emerge. No running away from the debate
and insulting the other person, making claims of victory,
when in reality, that person has merely run away.
....so you have no basis upon which to make that claim.
Dave posted:
And if you ignore this and start new threads about me,
then we will take it as an admission that you know that
you do not believe that you can defend your position.
owd:
You can believe what ever assumption you wish
I have and so has everyone else. You're a coward who knows
that he can't defend his position. And that is why when your
claims are directly responded to, you run away and start
another thread, claiming that the person who responded
is a false accuser, because they merely quoted what you said.
If you don't like what you say and don't want people to see it
then don't post it.
Dave posted:
Only a coward would run away from this, when they
claim to believe that the Bible proves their claims.
And only an evil man, would avoid this and start
more threads, attacking the challenger, who asked
for complete civility in the debate.
owd:
A courageous man knows when to walk away from a fool,
Which is why you end up in my kill file repeatedly,
when your foolishness gets too far gone.
Statement:
That the Father is Divine, and the Son is Divine,
does not imply that the Father and His Son are
the same being, or two persona of a single triune
being.
If you had any real argument to make, then you would not
have run away. And while you claim not to want to debate
me, here you are, making your doctrinal claims again. The
truth is, that you want a one way conversation and then
accuse others of being the way you are and not listening.
And why will you not admit to your own words? You believe
that Christ did not always exist and was not always divine.
Yet when that is pointed out, you run away like a little girl
and do exactly what you did here. You start a new thread
and pretend that you never said those things.
If you don't believe what you claim, then don't claim it in
the first place.
---------------------------------------------------------
Following is a selection of Scripture which will serve to
identify Dave for those who care to make that effort...
-+-
You mean a list of passages you twist into insults you throw
at me. Yet you claim that I am the one who is acting foolish.
You did exactly as expected.
1) You ran away.
2) You started a new thread for the purpose of attacking me.
3) You posted one insult and lie, after another.
I feel sorry for you. (:
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
07 Dec 2006 06:50:11 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:56:08 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ijsgn2pcomq7radsllt4oni3ijnnjl76f0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:00:34 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
She made outrageous claims here. BUT YOU LIKE THEM,
because you hate me, because I believe the Scriptures as
they are written and I did not place your feminism above
God's word. You seek the world's way and would gladly
change the Bible to suit the times. You probably even
like the feminist NIVI, the NIrV/NIV-PE and the new TNIV.
If you truly were seeking truth, then you would have said
clearly that you do not approve of her tactics. But since
you do, you decided to attack me instead, even though
all i did, was call one her to prove her accusations. This
shows that according to you, it is okay to accuse someone
of whatever you want and if the accused asks for proof,
then according to you, they are the evil one.
Yea, I'm really thinking of you when I think of what it means
to be a Christian. Not! (:
I dont hate you.
If that were true, then you wouldn't keep attacking me,
whenever I call people on their lies. And you know
she lied! You know DAMN WELL what she said is
NOT true!
You have made accusations against me and when
I ask you to prove them, as usual you just attack more.
You're a lying sack of crap! And you know you are lying!
Twice I mistook you for someone else and both times
when you showed me that, I apologized, you lying
piece of crap!
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
Translation: You're right Dave, you did apologize and I know
that I lied, but since I'm dishonest, that means that I also
don't have the integrity to admit it.
Let's look at an exchange in which you kept attacking me,
after I apologized for confusing you with someone else,
even though you admit I was confused.
The posters are as follows: Diana, you, me, you, me,
in that order.
*****************************************************
From: Azaliah - view profile
Date: Tues, Nov 14 2006 3:16 pm
Email: Azaliah <_giantwaff...@yahoo.com>
Groups: alt.christnet.christianlife
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:42:21 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <lady...@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaff...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:nr9kl25p67fi5jcrc6r531c41cbblmb63i@4ax.com...
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:03:09 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <lady...@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
Dave you are such a pathetic liar. They don't even remotely
post alike.
Thanks Di, but thats ok. Dave has a problem with confusion.
Sioux is a good Christian and a good friend so I consider that
a compliment.
A good Christian does not deny Scripture, nor do they attack
people who apologize for a simple mistake. Quit acting like
someone ran a spear through you. (:
You dont make simple mistakes, you attack, slander,
and lie so dont bother trying to tell me how to act.
You are certainly not an example of "a good christian".
So you claim. Yet here you are, attacking me and libeling me
and refusing to let a simple mistake go, even after an
apology. Thanks for showing me what it means to be
a good Christian!
And btw, when you accuse people of "slander", you should
remember that every time you have been asked to prove
that claim, you ran away. That's because you're a liar.
******************************************************
It seems to me that you have a habit of attacking me
like this. And you do it to defend heresy and that
makes you a heretic, since you approve of what
they say and attack me, every time I point out lies.
And btw, this time, I did not confuse who was who.
I nailed Diana's lies and exposed her for what she is.
And you jumped to her defense and tried to make it
look like I was attacking both her and you, liar.
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
16 Dec 2006 12:00:58 PM |
|
|
You are very poor in your ability to translate.
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:llnhn2pnuqne720gfjptie0h3s6nnlgrl1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:56:08 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ijsgn2pcomq7radsllt4oni3ijnnjl76f0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:00:34 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
She made outrageous claims here. BUT YOU LIKE THEM,
because you hate me, because I believe the Scriptures as
they are written and I did not place your feminism above
God's word. You seek the world's way and would gladly
change the Bible to suit the times. You probably even
like the feminist NIVI, the NIrV/NIV-PE and the new TNIV.
If you truly were seeking truth, then you would have said
clearly that you do not approve of her tactics. But since
you do, you decided to attack me instead, even though
all i did, was call one her to prove her accusations. This
shows that according to you, it is okay to accuse someone
of whatever you want and if the accused asks for proof,
then according to you, they are the evil one.
Yea, I'm really thinking of you when I think of what it means
to be a Christian. Not! (:
I dont hate you.
If that were true, then you wouldn't keep attacking me,
whenever I call people on their lies. And you know
she lied! You know DAMN WELL what she said is
NOT true!
You have made accusations against me and when
I ask you to prove them, as usual you just attack more.
You're a lying sack of crap! And you know you are lying!
Twice I mistook you for someone else and both times
when you showed me that, I apologized, you lying
piece of crap!
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
Translation: You're right Dave, you did apologize and I know
that I lied, but since I'm dishonest, that means that I also
don't have the integrity to admit it.
Let's look at an exchange in which you kept attacking me,
after I apologized for confusing you with someone else,
even though you admit I was confused.
The posters are as follows: Diana, you, me, you, me,
in that order.
*****************************************************
From: Azaliah - view profile
Date: Tues, Nov 14 2006 3:16 pm
Email: Azaliah <_giantwaff...@yahoo.com>
Groups: alt.christnet.christianlife
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:42:21 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <lady...@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaff...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:nr9kl25p67fi5jcrc6r531c41cbblmb63i@4ax.com...
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:03:09 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <lady...@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
Dave you are such a pathetic liar. They don't even remotely
post alike.
Thanks Di, but thats ok. Dave has a problem with confusion.
Sioux is a good Christian and a good friend so I consider that
a compliment.
A good Christian does not deny Scripture, nor do they attack
people who apologize for a simple mistake. Quit acting like
someone ran a spear through you. (:
You dont make simple mistakes, you attack, slander,
and lie so dont bother trying to tell me how to act.
You are certainly not an example of "a good christian".
So you claim. Yet here you are, attacking me and libeling me
and refusing to let a simple mistake go, even after an
apology. Thanks for showing me what it means to be
a good Christian!
And btw, when you accuse people of "slander", you should
remember that every time you have been asked to prove
that claim, you ran away. That's because you're a liar.
******************************************************
It seems to me that you have a habit of attacking me
like this. And you do it to defend heresy and that
makes you a heretic, since you approve of what
they say and attack me, every time I point out lies.
And btw, this time, I did not confuse who was who.
I nailed Diana's lies and exposed her for what she is.
And you jumped to her defense and tried to make it
look like I was attacking both her and you, liar.
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
.
.
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
16 Dec 2006 02:49:38 PM |
|
|
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
You are very poor in your ability to translate.
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:llnhn2pnuqne720gfjptie0h3s6nnlgrl1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:56:08 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ijsgn2pcomq7radsllt4oni3ijnnjl76f0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:00:34 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
She made outrageous claims here. BUT YOU LIKE THEM,
because you hate me, because I believe the Scriptures as
they are written and I did not place your feminism above
God's word. You seek the world's way and would gladly
change the Bible to suit the times. You probably even
like the feminist NIVI, the NIrV/NIV-PE and the new TNIV.
If you truly were seeking truth, then you would have said
clearly that you do not approve of her tactics. But since
you do, you decided to attack me instead, even though
all i did, was call one her to prove her accusations. This
shows that according to you, it is okay to accuse someone
of whatever you want and if the accused asks for proof,
then according to you, they are the evil one.
Yea, I'm really thinking of you when I think of what it means
to be a Christian. Not! (:
I dont hate you.
If that were true, then you wouldn't keep attacking me,
whenever I call people on their lies. And you know
she lied! You know DAMN WELL what she said is
NOT true!
You have made accusations against me and when
I ask you to prove them, as usual you just attack more.
You're a lying sack of crap! And you know you are lying!
Twice I mistook you for someone else and both times
when you showed me that, I apologized, you lying
piece of crap!
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
Translation: You're right Dave, you did apologize and I know
that I lied, but since I'm dishonest, that means that I also
don't have the integrity to admit it.
Dave uses this "translation" trick to convert what someone says into
something they did not say - so he can attack them with false accusation.
To google for truth --
http://groups.google.com/advanced_search?q=&hl=en&
Key words:
Poster: Azaliah, Pastor Dave, Giantwaffle, Ananias917, AD70
Phrase, or words to search for:
False Accusation, Lie,
Translated, translation
in other words, what you're saying is ...
Group: any
Date: any (smaller date ranges return fewer results)
Those who love truth search for it, those who don't, don't.
owd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Amazing Grace" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
16 Dec 2006 06:14:09 PM |
|
|
"oldwetdog" <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12o8mva4ntmn741@corp.supernews.com...
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
You are very poor in your ability to translate.
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:llnhn2pnuqne720gfjptie0h3s6nnlgrl1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:56:08 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ijsgn2pcomq7radsllt4oni3ijnnjl76f0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:00:34 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
She made outrageous claims here. BUT YOU LIKE THEM,
because you hate me, because I believe the Scriptures as
they are written and I did not place your feminism above
God's word. You seek the world's way and would gladly
change the Bible to suit the times. You probably even
like the feminist NIVI, the NIrV/NIV-PE and the new TNIV.
If you truly were seeking truth, then you would have said
clearly that you do not approve of her tactics. But since
you do, you decided to attack me instead, even though
all i did, was call one her to prove her accusations. This
shows that according to you, it is okay to accuse someone
of whatever you want and if the accused asks for proof,
then according to you, they are the evil one.
Yea, I'm really thinking of you when I think of what it means
to be a Christian. Not! (:
I dont hate you.
If that were true, then you wouldn't keep attacking me,
whenever I call people on their lies. And you know
she lied! You know DAMN WELL what she said is
NOT true!
You have made accusations against me and when
I ask you to prove them, as usual you just attack more.
You're a lying sack of crap! And you know you are lying!
Twice I mistook you for someone else and both times
when you showed me that, I apologized, you lying
piece of crap!
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
Translation: You're right Dave, you did apologize and I know
that I lied, but since I'm dishonest, that means that I also
don't have the integrity to admit it.
Dave uses this "translation" trick to convert what someone says into
something they did not say - so he can attack them with false accusation.
LOL You dont really think Dave would do that do you?
Grace
.
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
16 Dec 2006 06:49:35 PM |
|
|
Amazing Grace wrote:
"oldwetdog" <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12o8mva4ntmn741@corp.supernews.com...
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
You are very poor in your ability to translate.
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:llnhn2pnuqne720gfjptie0h3s6nnlgrl1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:56:08 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ijsgn2pcomq7radsllt4oni3ijnnjl76f0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:00:34 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
She made outrageous claims here. BUT YOU LIKE THEM,
because you hate me, because I believe the Scriptures as
they are written and I did not place your feminism above
God's word. You seek the world's way and would gladly
change the Bible to suit the times. You probably even
like the feminist NIVI, the NIrV/NIV-PE and the new TNIV.
If you truly were seeking truth, then you would have said
clearly that you do not approve of her tactics. But since
you do, you decided to attack me instead, even though
all i did, was call one her to prove her accusations. This
shows that according to you, it is okay to accuse someone
of whatever you want and if the accused asks for proof,
then according to you, they are the evil one.
Yea, I'm really thinking of you when I think of what it means
to be a Christian. Not! (:
I dont hate you.
If that were true, then you wouldn't keep attacking me,
whenever I call people on their lies. And you know
she lied! You know DAMN WELL what she said is
NOT true!
You have made accusations against me and when
I ask you to prove them, as usual you just attack more.
You're a lying sack of crap! And you know you are lying!
Twice I mistook you for someone else and both times
when you showed me that, I apologized, you lying
piece of crap!
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
Translation: You're right Dave, you did apologize and I know
that I lied, but since I'm dishonest, that means that I also
don't have the integrity to admit it.
Dave uses this "translation" trick to convert what someone says into
something they did not say - so he can attack them with false accusation.
LOL You dont really think Dave would do that do you?
Grace
Grace, you know you only thought you knew what you were saying, and that
what you said was almost exactly what you meant... but Dave figured it
out right a way, and what you really meant was completely different from
what you think you said...
..... got that?
lol
.
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
17 Dec 2006 04:27:36 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:49:35 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Grace, you know you only thought you knew what you were saying
Grace knew exactly what she was saying and when confronted
with it, she got angry.
And let us all notice that Diana still has not confessed to
her raunchy behavior. But hey, what do liars like you
and Grace care about that?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Amazing Grace" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
17 Dec 2006 08:04:35 AM |
|
|
oldwetdog wrote:
Amazing Grace wrote:
"oldwetdog" <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:12o8mva4ntmn741@corp.supernews.com...
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
You are very poor in your ability to translate.
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:llnhn2pnuqne720gfjptie0h3s6nnlgrl1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:56:08 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ijsgn2pcomq7radsllt4oni3ijnnjl76f0@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:00:34 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
She made outrageous claims here. BUT YOU LIKE THEM,
because you hate me, because I believe the Scriptures as
they are written and I did not place your feminism above
God's word. You seek the world's way and would gladly
change the Bible to suit the times. You probably even
like the feminist NIVI, the NIrV/NIV-PE and the new TNIV.
If you truly were seeking truth, then you would have said
clearly that you do not approve of her tactics. But since
you do, you decided to attack me instead, even though
all i did, was call one her to prove her accusations. This
shows that according to you, it is okay to accuse someone
of whatever you want and if the accused asks for proof,
then according to you, they are the evil one.
Yea, I'm really thinking of you when I think of what it means
to be a Christian. Not! (:
I dont hate you.
If that were true, then you wouldn't keep attacking me,
whenever I call people on their lies. And you know
she lied! You know DAMN WELL what she said is
NOT true!
You have made accusations against me and when
I ask you to prove them, as usual you just attack more.
You're a lying sack of crap! And you know you are lying!
Twice I mistook you for someone else and both times
when you showed me that, I apologized, you lying
piece of crap!
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
Translation: You're right Dave, you did apologize and I know
that I lied, but since I'm dishonest, that means that I also
don't have the integrity to admit it.
Dave uses this "translation" trick to convert what someone says into
something they did not say - so he can attack them with false accusation.
LOL You dont really think Dave would do that do you?
Grace
Grace, you know you only thought you knew what you were saying, and that
what you said was almost exactly what you meant... but Dave figured it
out right a way, and what you really meant was completely different from
what you think you said...
.... got that?
lol
Uhhhh, I think so.
Grace
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
17 Dec 2006 04:25:57 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 00:14:09 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
Dave uses this "translation" trick to convert what someone says into
something they did not say - so he can attack them with false accusation.
LOL You dont really think Dave would do that do you?
Grace, you can act stupid all you want to. But what we
notice, is that you could not refute what I said. You
falsely accused me. You know it. I know it. Glenn
knows it. But neither of you will admit it. Nor will
you admit to what Diana did, no matter what she does.
Because you prefer her to Jesus.
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "torresD" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
16 Dec 2006 02:58:20 PM |
|
|
Now,
of course I have nothing against
people deciding to put a Christmas
tree up in their home - on the contrary,
I fully support the idea for Christians
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3340419,00.html
Incredible contribution to Seattle menorah fiasco
Making a point not to celebrate
Christmas is a powerful way of
emphasizing our Jewish identity
and saving our children from
identity issues in the future
Published: 12.15.06, 10:33
Since my weekly column appears on Friday,
I was not planning on writing about the
Seattle International Airport
menorah/Christmas tree fiasco
which took place on Monday and Tuesday.
However, while I was driving in
my car something happened that
made me change my mind.
Although I do not usually listen to her show,
for some reason the radio in my car was tuned
to Dr. Laura Schlessinger's radio program.
For those who are unfamiliar with
Dr. Laura Schlessinger, she is a
pop radio therapist who offers
instant diagnoses and solutions
to the problems of those who call
in for advice.
Although she converted to
Judaism through Orthodoxy
in 1996,
she publicly renounced her
connection with Orthodox
Judaism in 2003.
Nonetheless, from the little I
have heard of her program in the past,
she always seems to be standing up for
family values, morality and common sense.
I was therefore shocked when
I heard her describe how outraged
she was that an "Orthodox rabbi"
demanded that a menorah be put up
at Seattle International Airport.
What she said next shocked me even more.
In solidarity with the airport that
had lost their Christmas trees,
Dr Laura announced that she,
"a Jew," was buying a Christmas
tree to put in the middle of her
living room this holiday season.
Danger of mixed messages
Now,
of course I have nothing against
people deciding to put a Christmas
tree up in their home - on the contrary,
I fully support the idea for Christians.
I can even understand mixed-faith
couples having both a menorah and
a Christmas tree in their homes
to celebrate both holidays.
And if Schlessinger was just
a regular person I would not
be writing this: many people
do counter-intuitive things
that I disagree with and I
ignore them.
Dr. Schlessinger's radio program,
however, attracts millions of
listeners and her words influence
the lives of many,
so her words warrant a response.
As a person who preaches the
importance of bringing up stable
children,
Dr. Schlessinger must know the
dangers of sending mixed messages
to children.
Diaspora Jews are subjected to
an insidious pressure to conform
to the majority.
Thus,
for a Jewish child growing
up in North America or Europe,
Christmas decorations that
appear outside the home are
challenging enough to his or
her Jewish identity.
To bring them into the home
serves to challenge their
identity even further.
It is precisely the children
who suffer most from duality
and confusion of mixed messages.
They are left unsure about their identity:
are they primarily Jewish,
Christian, American, British,
or an amalgamation of all the above?
Extra efforts needed
The fact is that one can be
patriotic and at the same time
not conform to national customs
and norms.
Not so when it comes to
our Jewish identities.
As members of a minority group,
Jews have to make an extra effort
to ensure a strong Jewish identity.
If we do not reinforce it,
it will inevitably start to fade.
By celebrating Christmas,
in any form, we are offering
up our own and our children's
Jewish identity on the altar
of conformity.
Making a point not to
celebrate Christmas is a
powerful way of emphasizing
our Jewish identity and saving
our children from identity
issues in the future.
Indeed, one of the most
compelling arguments for
the placing of menorahs
in public is for the
sake of Jewish children.
It was with great pride that
I took my children to place
menorahs in supermarkets,
banks, and public areas.
I want my children and other
local Jewish children to see
that their traditions are
also represented during
the holiday season.
Jewish kids should be able to feel
the same pride about their traditions
as Christian kids can feel about theirs.
Yes,
the lighting of the menorah
is a religious ritual,
but the symbol is festive
and traditional as well and,
when placed alongside Christmas
decorations,
allows Jews also to feel
special during the holiday season.
In light of all of this,
that a Jewish family therapist
of the caliber and influence of
Dr. Schlessinger should object to
a demand to put up a menorah at
an international airport,
which already had many
Christmas decorations on
display, is staggering.
Worse, the fact that she thinks
it a good idea to announce on
national radio that she,
a Jew, is placing a Christmas
tree in her home this year is
entirely beyond belief.
I wonder if she realizes or
cares about the potential
identity crises she may be
creating for Jewish children
across the United States
whose parents follow her
mistaken lead?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
17 Dec 2006 12:33:02 PM |
|
|
Just a little note.... so I will snip to it...
"torresD" <torresd30@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:M5Zgh.248$w91.135@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
<snip>
Now,
of course I have nothing against
people deciding to put a Christmas
tree up in their home - on the contrary,
I fully support the idea for Christians.
I can even understand mixed-faith
couples having both a menorah and
a Christmas tree in their homes
to celebrate both holidays.
How about singles of "mixed faith" ? As a Christian with a Jewish
background, I am celebrating both, as I do every year. I also do Passover
and the Passion Week, and all of both sets of religious holidays
<snip>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
17 Dec 2006 04:24:22 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:49:38 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
You are very poor in your ability to translate.
Dave uses this "translation" trick to convert what someone says into
something they did not say - so he can attack them with false accusation.
I didn't "translate" a thing, nor did I use that word here.
I quoted, word for word.
Now why is it that you would have a problem with that?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
25 Dec 2006 05:35:23 PM |
|
|
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mj6ao2pl103c0s3ummirlobfl63efdvr4k@4ax.com...
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:49:38 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
You are very poor in your ability to translate.
Dave uses this "translation" trick to convert what someone says into
something they did not say - so he can attack them with false accusation.
I didn't "translate" a thing, nor did I use that word here.
I quoted, word for word.
Quote
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
Translation: You're right Dave, you did apologize and I know
that I lied, but since I'm dishonest, that means that I also
don't have the integrity to admit it.
End quote
Now why is it that you would have a problem with that?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
.
.
|
|
|
| User: "oldwetdog" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
25 Dec 2006 06:02:00 PM |
|
|
Are you amazed, Glenn, that Dave would lie _in the same thread_?
I confess that at first I was, surprised, astounded, amazed...
Then I just got sick...
owd
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mj6ao2pl103c0s3ummirlobfl63efdvr4k@4ax.com...
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:49:38 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
You are very poor in your ability to translate.
Dave uses this "translation" trick to convert what someone says into
something they did not say - so he can attack them with false accusation.
I didn't "translate" a thing, nor did I use that word here.
I quoted, word for word.
Quote
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
Translation: You're right Dave, you did apologize and I know
that I lied, but since I'm dishonest, that means that I also
don't have the integrity to admit it.
End quote
Now why is it that you would have a problem with that?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
27 Dec 2006 10:07:12 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 16:02:00 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Are you amazed, Glenn, that Dave would lie _in the same thread_?
I confess that at first I was, surprised, astounded, amazed...
Then I just got sick...
owd
Once again you people twist words. You manipulate
the text. What I quoted, was word for word.
Prove I lied. Chopped up messages don't do that.
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mj6ao2pl103c0s3ummirlobfl63efdvr4k@4ax.com...
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 12:49:38 -0800, while bungee jumping,
oldwetdog <g.aedhealic@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
Glenn (Christian Mystic) wrote:
You are very poor in your ability to translate.
Dave uses this "translation" trick to convert what someone says into
something they did not say - so he can attack them with false accusation.
I didn't "translate" a thing, nor did I use that word here.
I quoted, word for word.
Quote
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
Translation: You're right Dave, you did apologize and I know
that I lied, but since I'm dishonest, that means that I also
don't have the integrity to admit it.
End quote
Now why is it that you would have a problem with that?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
.
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
07 Dec 2006 06:52:21 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:56:08 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
Tsk,tsk! Better see a doctor Dave, your memory is failing.
Goodbye.
P.S. If Diana did not answer my post and is not posting
because she is ill, then why is she posting in another group?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Code Programmer" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
08 Dec 2006 08:18:55 PM |
|
|
One question to ponder.
Why does everyone attack you?
Or is it paranoia?
I dont read everything you post, not by a long shot. In fact I would be
unlucky to ready 1% of what you write.
It is too much sword swinging.
Get a home group if you want your studies.
But this only leads to strife.
We all have the ability to snap and react badly.
Some people bring that out in others.
I have had enough of snapping, I am working on self improvement.
Part of that is avoiding irritants which achieve nothing good.
--
PEace
www.worldpeace.mail333.com
Ray M O'Keeffe
An open mind has eyes to see and ears to hear.
If you don't get to the end because you dont like the message, then dont be
surprised when it all goes south and you didnt see it coming.
God loves everyone. Remember that.
Blessed are the peace makers they shall be called the sons of God.
Many 666 Signs Point to 1 man...
http://beast666.faithweb.com/signs666.htm
5th Trumpet Fulfilled (Iraq) Pictures show prophecies.
http://beast666.faithweb.com/FifthTrumpet.htm
911 Foreknown by God points to Beast in Power
http://www.id-chip.4t.com/
www.angelfire.com/oz/zen/prophecy/
http://watchman888.land.ru/images/
http://beast666.faithweb.com/
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4bkgn2l35nie77h3s1id11o4o8n1u95apt@4ax.com...
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:53:12 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Amazing Grace" <ladyjay@infionline.net> shouted thusly:
"Azaliah" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d6ggn29a44v9epkqjhrar3d56sf8heib43@4ax.com...
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:56:29 GMT, while bungee jumping,
Azaliah <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
Thank you for you admission by silence, Diana.
Her silence is an admission of nothing.
Convince yourself of whatever you must.
It is due to the fact that she is ill. She hasnt been posting.
No posts from her after my message was sent? Try again.
The truth is, that Diana always seems to "be ill", right after
she attacks people and is called on it in this manner.
If you demand proof from others you should be willing
to do the same when it is asked of you.
If I make a claim about someone, then prove it is
exactly what I do. And it does not surprise me
that YOU imply that I don't and that I am a hypocrite.
It also does not surprise me that YOU would jump
to the defense of someone who makes such accusations
against me, when she cannot possibly prove them
and when we both know she's lying.
You are no less a hypocrite than she is, when you claim
to be a Christian and jump to her defense for making
such false accusations, when she is the guilty party.
This is the woman who "apologizes" and then attacks
me in the next message, without my even saying a word
to her. (:
She made outrageous claims here. BUT YOU LIKE THEM,
because you hate me, because I believe the Scriptures as
they are written and I did not place your feminism above
God's word. You seek the world's way and would gladly
change the Bible to suit the times. You probably even
like the feminist NIVI, the NIrV/NIV-PE and the new TNIV.
If you truly were seeking truth, then you would have said
clearly that you do not approve of her tactics. But since
you do, you decided to attack me instead, even though
all i did, was call one her to prove her accusations. This
shows that according to you, it is okay to accuse someone
of whatever you want and if the accused asks for proof,
then according to you, they are the evil one.
Yea, I'm really thinking of you when I think of what it means
to be a Christian. Not! (:
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
07 Dec 2006 06:52:41 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
10 Dec 2006 07:48:35 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
13 Dec 2006 12:08:39 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
14 Dec 2006 05:15:43 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:08:39 -0800, Azaliah <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
Who gives a ***** what you say. You can blabber on all day and the end
result is that you are still a fucking idiot.....
The scarey part is that people like you live in the same world as me.
It's because of lunatics like you that I own guns.
The last time some religion crazies trespassed on my property, and did
not leave after I told them to get the ***** my land, they got to
look down the barrel of my shotgun until the police arrived and hauled
their asses to jail.
It's too bad they no longer have public hangings or shootings for
trespassers and other criminals.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
15 Dec 2006 12:43:39 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:15:43 -0600, while bungee jumping,
fuckoff@*****.com shouted thusly:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:08:39 -0800, Azaliah
<_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
Who gives a ***** what you say.
Apparently, you. You read it. You responded to it.
You made sure to respond to Christian news groups
in order to do so. Guess what that tells us about you?
Wait, let me guess... This is that "love for mankind"
that atheists claim that they have and Christians don't,
right? <chuckle>
Bye now.
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
15 Dec 2006 04:46:56 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:43:39 -0800, Azaliah <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:15:43 -0600, while bungee jumping,
fuckoff@*****.com shouted thusly:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:08:39 -0800, Azaliah
<_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
Who gives a ***** what you say.
Apparently, you. You read it. You responded to it.
You made sure to respond to Christian news groups
in order to do so. Guess what that tells us about you?
Wait, let me guess... This is that "love for mankind"
that atheists claim that they have and Christians don't,
right? <chuckle>
Bye now.
Somehow I think you'd look real nice at the end of my shotgun barrel.
Come to my house to preach your ***** and you'll find out.
My trigger finger is itching........
There is no love for mankind when it comes to xtian garbage like you,
because I dont consider you part of mankind. Brainwashed cult
followers like you belong in permanently locked mental wards, after
they throw away the key. Your kind is dangerous, and you are likely
the type that molests and rapes children, especially those of the same
sex, and I bet you support the war too, because killing is what makes
you happy. Do us all a favor, move to Iraq and preach your ***** over
there. You deserve to be assassinated for spreading your xtian cult
terrorism.
You are one of the sickest motherfuckers on the internet. *****
AND DIE !!!!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
15 Dec 2006 12:44:02 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
20 Dec 2006 11:13:31 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatekeeper" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
20 Dec 2006 11:26:29 AM |
|
|
Azaliah wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
.
Diana is out fellowshipping with Diana BB and her crowd! Does not seem
that her discernment has improved any!
The Eastgate is open, the King is in Residence! Whosoever will, may
come in!
Gatekeeper
.
|
|
|
| User: "Diana" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
20 Dec 2006 04:24:02 PM |
|
|
"gatekeeper" <gatekeeper.eastgate@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166635589.318260.322030@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
Azaliah wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a "lie". That
is what is required, when you call someone a liar.
PROOF that I have told lies.
If you don't, then you have proved that you are the liar.
2) SLANDERER: Prove slander by me. Quote it, along
with a URL to it and also prove that it is "slander".
That is what is required, when you call someone
a slanderer. PROOF that it is slander.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the slanderer.
3) MASTER OF ALL GOSSIP: Prove that I am a master
of all gossip. Quote these messages, along with URL's
to them and also prove that they are "gossip". That is
what is required, when you call someone "the master
of all gossip". PROOF that it is gossip.
If you don't, then you prove that you are the master of
gossip, since you keep popping up in multiple threads,
for the sole purpose of making these claims about me.
The ball is in your court. And if all we see is silence,
that will be an admission of guilt by you. And if you
respond with anything other than the required proof,
that will also be an admission of guilt on your part.
But don't worry Diana, you can always apologize and
then immediately attack me again, just like last time,
proving that your apology was a lie.
So we await your answer. What say you?
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
.
Diana is out fellowshipping with Diana BB and her crowd! Does not seem
that her discernment has improved any!
The Eastgate is open, the King is in Residence! Whosoever will, may
come in!
Gatekeeper
I do not know DianaBB. Just a couple posts yesterday and today.
I don't fellowship with those such as you because you would rather belittle,
berate and say evil things against anyone that does not share your
interpretations.
Good bye. My last post to you because I don't need the stress of people such
as you in my life. Have a good life
.
|
|
|
| User: "Azaliah" |
|
| Title: Re: DIANA: YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT AZALIAH |
21 Dec 2006 10:31:39 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:24:02 -0500, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
"gatekeeper" <gatekeeper.eastgate@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1166635589.318260.322030@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
Azaliah wrote:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:34:45 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"Diana" <NO@.NO.com> shouted thusly:
Yes Azaliah, Giant Waffle, Ananias917 AD70 are all
one in the same... The very well know liar, slanderer,
master of all that gossip and more however it is ...
Pastor Dave
While you make claims about my actions, which are not true
anyway, bear in mind that you are doing exactly what you
claim I'm guilty of.
And now you are bound to prove the following accusations
that you just made. Unless of course, you wish to claim
that the proper thing to do, is to go around making
unfounded accusations against people, as you just did,
just because you hate them, as you just proved that you
hate me? And do us both a favor and don't be stupid enough
to think that we're stupid enough to believe you if you say
that you don't hate me.
Now here again are your claims. Will you run away from
your own words again?
1) LIAR: Provide a lie that I told. Quote it, along with
a URL to it and also prove that it was a | | | | |
