| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton" |
| Date: |
27 Nov 2003 01:35:02 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:53:07 GMT,
"Dorothy" <Zuukie@Comcast.net> wrote:
<cutting to the chase...>
Note that [those] on the {Pro-Choice] side, never exchange
information specifics, but only respond at the basic animal
emotional level. They post continuously but always at the basic
animal level, a very controlled manipulative response coming out
of the larger [Pro-Choice] community.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!
LYING is most assuredly your long suit.
And you are SO bone-ignorant, you wouldn't recognize a FACT if
it were a tyrannosaurus rex that was biting you in the butt. Probably
because NO facts even **exist** on your loathesome and hateful
ANTI-Choice side.
This outline, which I post with frequency, is FILLED with facts, and
toy won't be able to disprove ANY of them. So you not only are a totally
*dishonest* person who just once again proved that you have NO
credibility whatsoever, but you also are nothing more than a very
ignorant and hateful troll.
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryoes &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation*) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
*(AFTER the 7th month of gestation, rudimentary conscious
awareness is regarded possible, by medical science. But
that's a moot point since, per a report by JAMA, 99.99996%
of U.S. abortions already have been performed by that
point.)
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by its immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the year 2002 to date, in
the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic of
any nation in the entire history of the world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
| User: "Dorothy" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
28 Nov 2003 11:30:54 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton" <> wrote in message
news:3fd34ea9.13229005@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:53:07 GMT,
"Dorothy" <Zuukie@Comcast.net> wrote:
<cutting to the chase...>
Note that [those] on the {Pro-Choice] side, never exchange
information specifics, but only respond at the basic animal
emotional level. They post continuously but always at the basic
animal level, a very controlled manipulative response coming out
of the larger [Pro-Choice] community.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!
LYING is most assuredly your long suit.
And you are SO bone-ignorant, you wouldn't recognize a FACT if
it were a tyrannosaurus rex that was biting you in the butt. Probably
because NO facts even **exist** on your loathesome and hateful
ANTI-Choice side.
This outline, which I post with frequency, is FILLED with facts, and
toy won't be able to disprove ANY of them. So you not only are a totally
*dishonest* person who just once again proved that you have NO
credibility whatsoever, but you also are nothing more than a very
ignorant and hateful troll.
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryoes &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation*) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
*(AFTER the 7th month of gestation, rudimentary conscious
awareness is regarded possible, by medical science. But
that's a moot point since, per a report by JAMA, 99.99996%
of U.S. abortions already have been performed by that
point.)
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by its immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the year 2002 to date, in
the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic of
any nation in the entire history of the world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
-- Craig Chilton
Opinions without any footnotes. You have no idea what a fact is. Why would
I bother to contest your opinions. You are entitled to them. Free country
and all that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
29 Nov 2003 10:48:48 AM |
|
|
"Dorothy" <Zuukie@Comcast_nospam_.net> wrote in message
news:iaWxb.251067$ao4.893440@attbi_s51...
"Craig Chilton" < > wrote in message
news:3fd34ea9.13229005@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:53:07 GMT,
"Dorothy" <Zuukie@Comcast.net> wrote:
<cutting to the chase...>
Note that [those] on the {Pro-Choice] side, never exchange
information specifics, but only respond at the basic animal
emotional level. They post continuously but always at the basic
animal level, a very controlled manipulative response coming out
of the larger [Pro-Choice] community.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!
LYING is most assuredly your long suit.
And you are SO bone-ignorant, you wouldn't recognize a FACT if
it were a tyrannosaurus rex that was biting you in the butt. Probably
because NO facts even **exist** on your loathesome and hateful
ANTI-Choice side.
This outline, which I post with frequency, is FILLED with facts, and
toy won't be able to disprove ANY of them. So you not only are a
totally
*dishonest* person who just once again proved that you have NO
credibility whatsoever, but you also are nothing more than a very
ignorant and hateful troll.
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryoes &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation*) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
*(AFTER the 7th month of gestation, rudimentary conscious
awareness is regarded possible, by medical science. But
that's a moot point since, per a report by JAMA, 99.99996%
of U.S. abortions already have been performed by that
point.)
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by its immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the year 2002 to date, in
the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic of
any nation in the entire history of the world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
-- Craig Chilton
Opinions without any footnotes. You have no idea what a fact is. Why
would
I bother to contest your opinions. You are entitled to them. Free
country
and all that.
Obviously you haven't really comprehend the many arguments, such as in
abortion news groups.
The anti-abortionists are ALWAYS the ones who bellow either unsupported
garbage, or cite ONLY anti-abortionist extremist references.
YOU asked for "information specifics" - your words, not mine.
You were given "information specifics".
True, they did not have detailed references, but not only is that NOT what
you asked for ... you have been provided MORE than most anti-abortionists
have to offer.
But......then again ..this is typical of the corrupt games anti-abortionists
play.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
29 Nov 2003 08:34:40 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 05:30:54 GMT,
"Dorothy" <Zuukie@Comcast.net> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Dorothy" <Zuukie@Comcast.net> wrote:
<cutting to the chase...>
Note that [those] on the [Pro-Choice] side, never exchange
information specifics, but only respond at the basic animal
emotional level. They post continuously but always at the basic
animal level, a very controlled manipulative response coming out
of the larger [Pro-Choice] community.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!
LYING is most assuredly your long suit.
And you are SO bone-ignorant, you wouldn't recognize a FACT if
it were a tyrannosaurus rex that was biting you in the butt. Probably
because NO facts even **exist** on your loathesome and hateful
ANTI-Choice side.
This outline, which I post with frequency, is FILLED with facts, and
toy won't be able to disprove ANY of them. So you not only are a totally
*dishonest* person who just once again proved that you have NO
credibility whatsoever, but you also are nothing more than a very
ignorant and hateful troll.
ANALYZING ABORTION-ON-REQUEST* in the USA
*(Abortion Rights as they have existed since 1-22-73)
Abortion terminates entities (z/e/fs: zygotes, embryoes &
fetuses, up until the 7th month of gestation*) which have ALL
of these characteristics in common with sperm and ova:
-- Human
-- Unique
-- As a stage of development, indispensable to future birth
-- Have NEVER experienced conscious awareness
-- Alive
...which makes it hypocritical when abortion opponents
try to defend z/e/fs but NOT sperm and ova.
*(AFTER the 7th month of gestation, rudimentary conscious
awareness is regarded possible, by medical science. But
that's a moot point since, per a report by JAMA, 99.99996%
of U.S. abortions already have been performed by that
point.)
And the Bible, which is the primary moral authority for the
majority of Americans:
-- In NO way condemns abortion
-- Doesn't even MENTION abortion
-- By Jesus' day, abortion had been around for 1,000 yrs.
-- Contains NO defenses of s/o/z/e/fs
-- Reserves ALL of its protection for already-BORN people
-- That the Bible regards personhood to begin at BIRTH is
made clear by its immense emphasis on the importance
of BIRTH order, and BIRTHrights.
-- In certain cases, condemned BABIES to horrible deaths
-- Never indicates that there is anything "special" about
fertilization
-- Thus making z/e/f and sperm & ova of EQUAL worth
Abortion-on-request enables women to:
-- Put their lives back on track immediately
-- Restore their well-being to pre-unplanned pregnancy levels
-- Vast majority of women are happy with this decision
-- Most women have no regrets
-- Restore their full range of future opportunities
-- Avoid physical difficulties of a 9-month pregnancy
-- Especially important for young girls, ~12-16
-- Statistically 6-10 times safer than carrying-to-term
-- Avoid the trauma of adopting-out, and wondering later
-- Avoid possibility of changing mind about adopting-out
-- Reduce likelihood of long-term economic deprivation
-- Avoid bringing child into less-loving home
-- Avoid bringing child into unstable environment
-- Wait until timing is better before having children
-- Who then are MORE likely to be loved
-- Who then are MORE likely to be in stable home
-- And thus are LESS like to have troubled childhoods
-- And therefore more likely NOT to become criminals
-- And thus are MORE likely to become successful
Legal abortion-on-request:
-- Is exponentially safer than illegal abortions
-- Thus saving the lives of hundreds or thousands of women/yr.
-- Has been available throughout the USA since early 1973
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 30 million women have had them
-- Between 1973 and 2000, 40 million abortions have been done
Other related facts include:
-- MOST women who have abortions go on to HAVE kids later,
when the timing is better
-- Those children would NOT have been born if the abortions
had not taken place earlier, because the same sperm and
ova would not have matched up.
-- Those "2nd-round" kids STARTED reaching age 13 in
significant numbers by 1988. By the early 1990s, millions
of those "2nd-round" kids were in their mid-teens by the
early 1990s.
-- Mid-teens is the highest risk age for crime, and this
continues into the early 20s.
-- As pointed out above, wanted and loved children are
LESS prone to criminal behavior.
-- By 1995, millions of "2nd-round kids" were entering the
workforce. Perhaps a million-plus MORE have entered it
every year SINCE. By 2000, the oldest ones had reached
the age where they could be getting quite successful.
-- Since the early 1990s, the rate of violent crime in the USA
has declined dramatically, and by 2000 was at 40-year
lows in many categories.
-- The decade of the 1990s, and the year 2002 to date, in
the USA, has been the most economically-dynamic of
any nation in the entire history of the world.
Although the exact figures may be impossible to derive, the
probability that abortion-on-request has SIGNIFICANTLY benefitted
all of America's society in terms of the crime rate and the economy
is QUITE strong, despite the temporary anomaly caused by the attack
on Sept. 11, 2001. And a strong U.S. economy benefits the entire
world.
Opinions without any footnotes.
ROTFL!!!! The sure way to identify an especially-IGNORANT
Anti-Choicer/RRR cultist: when they demand footnotes for facts
that are as obvious as Eastern-horizon sunrises. You are a JOKE,
Dorothy. Obviously better suited to life in Oz than in the real world.
Head back home... your tornadic transportation is waiting for you.
When you get there, you can go witch-hunting again. That's about
all that people like you are good for.
You have no idea what a fact is.
Krisblake beat me to you with a response that I can't possibly top,
when she said: "You wouldn't know a fact if one had sex with you."
(But no self-respecting fact ever would. They have no desire to be
contaminated by lies.)
Why would I bother to contest your opinions?
FIRST, you'd have to fin some opinions to contest. Most of the
above outline is comprised of solid FACTS, and the opinions that
*are* in there are solidly BASED on those facts.
So why would you bother? MOST people of your ilk don't even try.
They just LIE and WHINE a whole lot.
That's called "cowardice."
(Also, "ignorance.")
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
GOD'S "WIN-WIN-WIN" SITUATION
God is omniscient and omnipotent. That means that He has
always KNOWN everything *about* everything, past present and
future. And that He may freely INTERACT, uniquely, with any
person, group, or all humanity, however and whenever He
chooses.
Trillions (indeed, even octillions) of years ago, God KNEW
just *which* human entities (from sperm and ova on, inclusive)
would be born, and which ones would NOT, for whatever
reason. In the case of Jeremiah, He interacted BEFORE
Jeremiah reached the womb -- while Jeremiah was STILL at
the sperm-and-ovum stage! (Jer. 1:5). In THAT case, at least,
the soul had been instilled at the sperm-and-egg stage -- the
stage at which God communicated with Jeremiah.
So it's VERY possible that God instills ALL souls at that
stage... since God ALREADY knows which of them will later
become people, and which ones will not. And if He chooses
to instill souls in ALL of those, then heaven must be a VERY
populated place. But any potential people that happened to
be aborted then got a FREE pass to heaven. And missed the
RISK that is faced by all of us here on earth.
And then, there also is the very REAL possibility that God
chooses to instill souls ONLY in the entities that He KNOWS,
beforehand, *will* be BORN. Then there are NO free passes
to heaven. But that's no loss to the QUINTILLION human
entities, daily, that never knew the difference.
Any way you look at it, it's a "win-win" situation for God.
Which makes it no great surprise that He never said so much
as ONE SINGLE WORD against abortion. Since abortion is a
highly-valuable REMEDY that enables millions of women to put
their lives BACK on track, and gives them another chance to
pursue their full ranges of future opportunities, the availability of
it is FAR more in line with God's COMPASSION (and the
compassion that Jesus commanded us to show to others), than
it would be for women to be FORCED to carry-to-term against
their will, and see many of their opportunities and their well-being
destroyed. (Particularly since God ALSO was/is well-aware that
MOST women who DO obtain abortions go on later to HAVE
children, by choice, when the timing is better, and the circum-
stances and prospects for long-term stable family environments
are far more favorable.)
For God, the status quo is "win-win-win" -- all the way!
-- Posted to several relevant Usenet Groups on 10-21-2001.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
.
|
|
|
| User: "golddodgearies" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
29 Nov 2003 07:24:49 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3fe4ab9e.118530318@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 05:30:54 GMT,
And you are SO bone-ignorant, you wouldn't recognize a FACT if
it were a tyrannosaurus rex that was biting you in the butt.
It's a fact that the parents are human beings, you retarded degenerate murderer.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
30 Nov 2003 02:05:12 AM |
|
|
"golddodgearies" <golddodgearies@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:44e87bc2.0311291724.5ad803f2@posting.google.com...
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message
news:<3fe4ab9e.118530318@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 05:30:54 GMT,
And you are SO bone-ignorant, you wouldn't recognize a FACT if
it were a tyrannosaurus rex that was biting you in the butt.
It's a fact that the parents are human beings,
It's a fact that caterpillars are butterflies too?
you retarded degenerate murderer.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
29 Nov 2003 10:00:46 PM |
|
|
On 29 Nov 2003 17:24:49 -0800,
"golddodgearies" golddodgearies@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton < > wrote:
And you are SO bone-ignorant, you wouldn't recognize a
FACT if it were a tyrannosaurus rex that was biting you in
the butt.
It's a fact that the parents are human beings, you retarded
degenerate murderer.
What I said above is 100% true, and you continue
to be a very IDIOTIC lying troll.
READERS: To see just how MUCH of a moron this jerk
is, I invite you to read my previous post in this thread.
-- Craig Chilton
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
30 Nov 2003 03:49:42 AM |
|
|
On 29 Nov 2003 17:24:49 -0800,
(golddodgearies) wrote:
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3fe4ab9e.118530318@netnews.mchsi.com>...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 05:30:54 GMT,
And you are SO bone-ignorant, you wouldn't recognize a FACT if
it were a tyrannosaurus rex that was biting you in the butt.
It's a fact that the parents are human beings...
Dinosaurs nor facts have human being parents, imbecile.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Krisblake" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
29 Nov 2003 03:55:36 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 05:30:54 GMT, "Dorothy"
<Zuukie@Comcast_nospam_.net> wrote:
[...]
Opinions without any footnotes. You have no idea what a fact is.
You wouldn't know a fact if one had sex with you.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "golddodgearies" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
27 Nov 2003 08:01:48 PM |
|
|
(Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3fd34ea9.13229005@netnews.mchsi.com>...
[snip]
You have to prove their parents are non-humans, dum-dum.
.
|
|
|
| User: "--sexkitten--" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
28 Nov 2003 07:21:45 AM |
|
|
"golddodgearies" <golddodgearies@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:44e87bc2.0311271801.21ffb32d@posting.google.com...
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message
news:<3fd34ea9.13229005@netnews.mchsi.com>...
[snip]
You have to prove their parents are non-humans, dum-dum.
Nope.
You need to prove that tadpoles are frogs.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Frank Dwyer" |
|
| Title: Re: Echoes of Roe v Wade |
30 Nov 2003 09:50:47 AM |
|
|
golddodgearies wrote:
xanadu222@mchsi.com (Craig Chilton) wrote in message news:<3fd34ea9.13229005@netnews.mchsi.com>...
[snip]
You have to prove their parents are non-humans, dum-dum.
It's not a seed, it's an unplanted flower.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
