Re: Literal Genesis



 Religions > Bible > Re: Literal Genesis

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "David Jensen"
Date: 23 Sep 2003 11:54:41 AM
Object: Re: Literal Genesis
In alt.talk.creationism, John W <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in
<e4jvmvk3c87ulemjtner662nb118ll0516@4ax.com>:

On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:07:40 -0700, "Iconoclast" <icono@home.net>
wrote:


"IknowHimDoYou" <IknowHim@leavingsoon.com> wrote in message
news:IknowHim-2209030925290001@pm6-30.kalama.com...

Literal Genesis

The Hebrew grammer of Genesis


Is COMPLETELY unknown to those today including you.


You forget the NUMEROUS Hebrew and Greek scholars today, Icon, who
have translated the various versions of the Bible we use now. I have
known probably 20 or 30 Bible translators in my time.

I see no evidence that you have ever talked to a translator of ancient
texts. All translations rely on the word and the sense in which it is
used. Translations are easiest when being done from a living language
with a contemporary text. Older languages are more of a challenge, but,
if they have a lot of text (eg Ancient Greek, Latin), it is relatively
easy to understand context and implications, particularly of idiom. Old
languages with only a relatively small corpus are quite difficult to
understand in the details and idioms.
Yes, modern translators do think that they have puzzled out most of the
Hebrew, but you will not find any translator worth hiring who would
claim to be able to do a definitive translation which includes the full
meaning of the text.
.

 

NEWER

pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER