UKLAD49 <uklad0711@yahoo.co.uk>

UKLAD49 <uklad0711@yahoo.co.uk>

Re: Naked Apes Offended?

On 16 Nov, 21:23, Apobetics <apobe...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Naked Apes Offended?

The naked apes who claim they are not created by God but evolved by
accident of random mutations take offense to anyone who agrees with
them. This is incredible!
If we, who have been created by God in His own image, say they also
have been created by God the screech and howl "It is not so!". Yet if
we agree that they did come about by goo to you by way of the zoo they
also howl and screech "Not so!"

Perhaps someone can explain this dichotomy? Which is it; naked apes
of evolution or created mankind.

The answer: two kinds; one created by God (mankind) and the other a
product of blind evolution (naked apes).

6/24/6000

Take any member of "mankind" and remove his (or her) clothing and
stand them beside this "naked ape" that you seem to take so much
pleasure in attacking.

What differences are apparent? None at all.

Therefore "mankind" and the "naked apes" are one and the same
creature.

Hello,

Yes outward appearances have many basic similarities. But does that
prove that one evolved from the other?

Let's look at their accomplishments. How many "naked apes" have built
towering skyscrapers, or long bridges over waterways etc. Obviously,
there is a HUGE difference between those two life forms, despite any
physical similarites.

Also, if evolution were really true, then it promotes survival of the
fittest etc. Clearly, humans are more fit than "naked apes" etc, so
why are those "naked apes" still here? They are the lessor ones on
that alleged evolutionary scale. Why keep the inferior type around?

Or better yet, what about the alleged 'ape-men', that so-called
evolutionary 'missing link' between apes and humans? They would have
been more 'fit' than the lower apes. So why did evolution decide to
keep the 'less fit' apes, and trash the 'more fit' ape-men? If the
lower apes are still here, shouldn't the high form ape-men be here
also?

Of course there are reasonable answers here if one goes to the Bible.
It tells us that all life forms were created according to their
"kind". Thus we have the apes today because God created the apes as
full and complete apes. They were never intended to turn into
something else. And we simultaneously have humans today, because God
created them as full and complete humans. And that is also what the
fossil record basically shows; i.e, life forms appearing suddenly and
fully formed, and existing for long periods of time.

Yes, the Bible's teachings are much more in tune with proven science,
than those evolutionary teachings are.

Sincerely, James

**If you wish to have a discussion with me, please use email since I
do not follow ng threads