"KnightsKnives" <Here@Now.com> wrote in message
news:11tov78pfrs565@corp.supernews.com...

"Daniel Halligan" <Penguin@cybrzn.com> wrote in message
news:11tltigks132ae0@corp.supernews.com...

oldwetdog wrote:

KnightsKnives wrote:

"oldwetdog" <oldwetdog@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:11tbhutq8m0sh91@corp.supernews.com...

KnightsKnives wrote:

"Al Smith" <invalid@address.com> wrote in message
news:n_SAf.160292$Ph4.4849882@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...

For anyone who watches the news and keeps up with current Events
Realizes we are living in very Dangerous times. During the Cold
war
although we came very close to WW3, Cooler heads prevailed because
neither side wanted their Country Destroyed. Unlike today where
Killing
innocents in the name of Allah is looked at with pride. Today Iran
is
Looking to become a nuclear Power with it's president wanting
Israel to
be Wiped off the Map.
Israel and America must stop this from happening... but will an
attack
on the facility start the war or will doing nothing let Iran
strike
first starting Armageddon?

From articles I have read the deadline is the end of march a mere
3

months away for Israel to do something before enrichment begins.
you
can't attack a fully enriched facility or risk Radioactive
fallout.

An attack is inevitable. It's been planned for a very long time. It
is in the pipe. I imagine the date has been set, subject to changes
in weather or other factors that might affect the strike. From
reports that have been published in the press, it seems to be set
for the spring. There is not a damn thing Iran can do about it,
other than roll over, expose its belly, and lick the hands of
America and Israel. Which Iran is not prepared to do. I'm just
wondering if the US is going to go it alone, or if Israel is going
to help. Maybe America is going to finance a strike by Israel?

Though I don't like to get into this, I feel obligated. If the
situation is not neutralized to the point of Israel's expectations
Israel will attack. They have never strayed from their
preservation.
They are consummate diplomats, though, and have proven this time
and again. (Read about Egypt and the treaty) The likely result will
be through diplomatic channels. As the permanent members of the
U.N. have been unwanton in a nuclear outcome it will be likely for
them to proceed from the diplomatic stances that these nations
support.
Though as we have seen in the preservation of their State Israel
will not dally, or be consoled from their stance on this issue by
the permanent members of the U.N. The problem is that at this time
the 5 members disagree on how to settle the issue.
If Israel is close to war, it will most likely be sanctioned from
the U.N. and only because the powers that be deem Iran as radical as
Iraq once was.
That really is not the main concern. What most people do not
know is that Germany sold the plans for a centrifuge that produces
weapons grade Uranium to Iraq.
The first war on Iraq, did not "contain" the information. Once
the cessation of the war ended and we found that they were less than
a year away to becoming a Nuclear Nation, we did nothing to contain
the nuclear problem.
When we put the embargo on this nation, the food for oil campaign
began. During this time this nation was in need of money, and having
the idea to create chaos it would not be hard to think that not only
did they give the diffusion information to Libya, they probably sold
it to other countries who would persist in their ideology of getting
rid of Israel. In the last days before second war with Iraq, with
the leadership of Iraq having no ability to achieve its agenda, they
probably sold and gave the information to other countries or even
gave the information away.
I am being brief here so some of the information that I have
written here is not complete which might make it seem inaccurate.
Our current efforts at foreign policy are trying to prevent the
ability of Nuclear War in the middle east. Those who have the
notion that if we stick our head in a hole and wait out the danger,
only promote the ability of radicals to obtain their goals. Though
we thought we were being lied to for the second war, in war you
cannot give all of the reasons and show your hand. From the outset
the truth to this matter has been said by the government. We do not
want Radicals to obtain Nuclear Weapons. We are at war with any
radical who tries to obtain a nuclear weapon.
As for this being the last and the end times it is not because of
Iran. It may be that the dissemination of the centrifuge information
to the nations of the east will be the reason for an all out nuclear
war.
However, we have learned from India and Pakistan, that if the
leaders can control their anger, and they are reasonable, the
nuclear problem becomes a non-problem. It is the "What If" scenario
that is feared by the super powers who are not into selling Nuclear
secrets who will be on the attack of letting this information
disperse throughout the middle eastern nations. The "What If"
scenario that disturbs us is because of what we see in North Korea.
These are likely scenarios and not predictions. They are
supported through the information that comes from recent information
and from past press. The person to whom I am responding to is
probably more accurate, but I am just adding to the possible results
and making clear what has been said, what is known to the public,
but everything presented is not as it seems. There are plans within
plans.
This is my last post on this issue. You will see depending on
the choices of the leaders how this plays out. For each choice a
new door opens and a new scenario presents itself. That is why
there are so many scenarios that I present here. The probabilities
depend on the choices.


KnightsKnives

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World
War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
Albert Einstein

Sticks or stones, clubs, spears or swords; mankind has never picked
up a weapon he did not use.

If "sword" is a metaphor for any weapon, then what is a Great Sword?

"And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given
to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they
should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword."
Rev 6:4 KJV

Mankind does not control his destiny.

The Destiny of mankind is not his to determine--it never was >>>>
The question of "IF mankind will use nuclear weapons, or not, has
already been answered. The question is not "If" they will be used,
but "When?"

Actually this is not so. It could be from a Meteor or a natural event.
It could also be from a new weapon that is not nuclear in nature. Check
out Scientific American and read into it the possibilities of the new
weapons that are possible. There is no certain way. Also there are
different interpretations as to what will be other than the one you
present. Yet it is not improbable that your scenario presents itself. I
am just putting out other possibilities, including one that does not
destroy the Earth.
If I respond to your next post, it will have to be snipped to the current
conversation.