On Mar 22, 3:10 pm, "Bill M" <w...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
The Bibles are nothing more than books of myths, fables, contradictions,
human and animal sacrifices, genocide, slaveholding, misogyny, destructio=
n,
barbarisms, and impossible tales. They are not accurate history and
certainly are not the words of any god unless he is an insane and totally
untrustworthy monster. They are not even good fiction.
We all know that your master Darwin missed the point about the
bible. No small wonder
The average person today does not appreciate the difficulty and unlikelih=
ood
of producing accurate transmissions of the original Bibles. Firstly there
are no originals in existence. They are all copies of copies of unknown
accuracy.
One of the problems with the accuracy of the Bibles is that when they were
copied, no marks of punctuation were used, no distinction was made between
lower case and upper case letters and more bizarre to modern script, no
spaces were used to separate words.
This kind of continuous writing was called "scriptuo continua"
'godisnowhere' could mean 'god is now here' or quit the opposite, 'god is=
no
where' depending on the spacing which not used at the time. This left
accurate interpretation very difficult and unlikely.
Add to this the natural occurrence of errors of transmission and the
intentional modification to suite the transcribers wishes and beliefs and
you have documents of highly questionable meaning and accuracy.
Further compounding the problem was the size and accuracy of the
vocabularies were much more limited than today.
The Bibles are a foundation of quicksand. There are NO ORIGINALS in
existence. Why would not any 'real' God protect the originals??? What are
available are altered copies of copies by unknown men of questionable
veracity. The books of the Bibles were written over 1,000 years before the
invention of the printing press. Even the so called originals were
supposedly written by 50 or more different authors of unknown veracity. T=
hey
are biased by, and dependent on the writings and opinions of the clergy. =
And
the status and survival of the clergy is totally dependent on their follo=
wer's
belief in their Bible stories. There are 18 different English versions al=
one
and there is no way of knowing how far they have wondered from the
originals.
And there is no evidence that even the originals are anything more than
inaccurate fiction.
Basing ones life and faith on these documents is not very sound reasoning.
<Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote in message
news:1174434015.511631.238010@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 19, 4:40 am, "arah" <arah1...@gmail.com> wrote:
Paul Was A Deceiver!
He was Satan In The Flesh! An Antichrist!
Matthew 24:4-5 states you will be deceived by people that come using
Jesus' name. Consider the parable of the sower. Jesus was warning us
then that as soon as His Gospel was preached, the enemy (Paul) would
be there to steal the truth!
***The real (untranslated) name of Jesus is Y'hoshua (pronounced
like the name Joshua but with a Y, YoHoshua, some pronounce his name
as Yeshua). All refer to the Son of God who came as the promised
Messiah
Now before you throw a tantrum and wonder why I haven't been struck by
lightening straight from the throne room of God, I can prove to you
that Paul was a Fraud using his own words. Of course, if you're a
female, and you're in the ministry, you already know he was, you
probably just didn't realize it! For to be a female and in the
ministry of the Lord, you had to turn your back on Paul to follow
Jesus. Congrats! You figured it out! You refused to buy into the lie
pie Satan tried to sell you as Paul!
I'm going to make some startling points to wake your mind up into the
truth, so hear me out, then I'll go through and explain each one and
give you all the proof you need to see for yourself that what I'm
saying is indeed the truth.
Paul was Satan in the Flesh
Paul was never recognized as an apostle by the Disciples OR Jesus
The information given in the Bible says otherwise.
Now the question the Bible or you?
Paul was never trained by the disciples, the men who walked, talked,
and broke bread with our Saviour. He received his knowledge from
"revelations."
This is what revelation means. No human training is needed
Paul's account of his Damascus Road Experience changed every time he
told it, thus the disciples knew he was lying.
How about Luke changing the story to fit the need of his audience.
I am not saying Luke was being a fraud, but that Paul experience
was obvious to anyone that there was no need to embelish it
Paul declared he was teaching another Gospel of which he himself was
the Father
Without the Gospel of Paul you will be stoned to death
for working on Saturday, you will be circumcised and
taking ablution before prayers. You will turn
to Jerusalem for prayers, you will be colonized by the
JEWISH COSTUM. Adutlerers will be stoned to death.
You will considered leprosy as a curse from God
Impur people with leprozy will be segrated and not attended to
You will not eating pork.
You will not own dogs.
Are you attracted to Islam? It Is Paul teaching in REVERSE
Paul declared he himself was the son of God
Reference????
Paul issued his own commandments and laws for people to adhere to
He did not issue the dietary Law that the Apostles decreed during
the Council of Jerusalem. But his explanation about the fact that
the dietary Law elements of
the Old COVENANT can't exist within the CONTEXT of the
NEW COVENANT make sense.
After all Jesus is reported to have said that you can't put
the A New wine in the Old jar
Paul taught the exact Opposite of what Jesus and His real disciples
did.
What did Jesus taught? Weere you there when Jesus was teaching
Paul worked to destroy and undo everything Jesus and His disciples did
and were doing.
Like what? Like running away from the Gentiles because
they were impure for not being circumcised?
That is a good thing I like him for that.
Paul was never repentant for being the greatest persecutor of
Christians at that time! He boasted about it! Over and Over!
You are taking God's place. It is for God to know
If he did or did not. He is the only one you can
read the heart
Paul said God's law was a Curse. Jesus said it was a blessing. Who's
lying?
Where did Jesus say that? Jesus was put to death because
he was accused of breaking Moses Law by working on Sabbath
day. He was later rejected as the Christ by Israel because
Moses Law says:" CURSED IS THE ONE HUNG ON THE TREE"
It is easy to misuse the Law. This is what the Scribes were
doing as a result Jesus cursed them: WOE TO YOU
PHARISEES AND SCRIBES BECAUSE YOU USE THE LAW
TO ENSLAVE THE POORS
Paul condemned Jesus and His disciples for false teachings, he
condemned Jesus Himself for having long hair in 1 Corinthians 11:14,
something approved in Numbers 6:5 and Judges 13:5.
No, it was saying that Jesus the Christ and as the Christ
he was entitled to some special priviledges because you
will never sin. Men frequently do sin
Jesus Said: Keep the Sabbath (Mark 2:27), circumcise male children
(Luke 2:21), Paul Said: Circumcision is not necessary (Romans 2:26)
that is going against what the Christ said in Luke 2:21.
Even the Islamic doctrine which poist itself as the defender
of Law of Moses by enforcing circumcision and
some other commendments of Moses Law did not follow
the SABBATH to the Letter. It chose Friday as the day
of rest for the UMMAH. Some calendars put Friday
as the day when Jesus was put to death.
In 1 Corinthians 15:1 Paul says that he was not giving them anything
but what "he preached." He explained this even further in the second
book (or letter) to the Corinthians (2 Corinthians 11:17). It reads -
"That which I speak, I speak it not after the Lord, but as it were
foolishly, in this confidence of boasting." He's telling you plain and
simple he was speaking of himself and not from or of the Lord!"
Boasting was a sin and not a virtu. Paul did not learn boasting
from Jesus Himself from the world which praise such people.
Jesus being holy, there was no boasting in him.
You are being too literal, here you are dealing with RHETORIC
Paul cursed Jesus and His disciples
POST YOUR REFERENCE
Paul claimed he himself was the son of God
POST YOUR REFERENCE. CITE PLEASE
Paul Supported and demanded Adherence to Iniquity (Discrimination),
Jesus said to not let it be found among us! Who's lying?
Jesus know the difference between man and woman and their
different responsabilities. SECULAR TEACHING DON'T.
He knew that women get pregnant and men don't...
Good thing Paul imitated Jesus
Jesus: When Yahshua confronts the Adversary, he defeats him by saying,
"You shall live by every word that proceeds from the mouth of YHWH,
and Him alone will you serve."
Paul: When Paul is mobbed by people who wish to stone him for
preaching against the Law of YHWH, he relies on the worldly
authorities as a Roman entitled to the protection of the government
rulers who save him (Dt. 8:3, Mt.4:4, Acts 22:26, 23:27
Between the barbarian Law of the Jew and their court
and the Roman court I would do exactly what Paul did.
At least he had the right to defend himself
before being mobbed abd stoned to death as it should have
be done within the Jewish court.
Jesus: "DO NOT CALL ANYONE ON EARTH YOUR FATHER; for ONE IS YOUR
FATHER, HE who is in heaven"
(Matthew 23:9)
The devil 'PAUL' BLASPEMOUSLY BOASTED
"For I BECAME YOUR FATHER"
(1 Corinthians 4:15)
Did this force you to call him father? You are
still calling Paul and there is no Law against that.
I think you are being too literal.
What do you call your biological father?
...
read more =BB- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
