Religions > Bible > Re: Please, Tell Me Why You Love Bush and Satan and Hate Jesus
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Kneel before Satan and Bush!" |
| Date: |
01 Jul 2003 09:37:08 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Please, Tell Me Why You Love Bush and Satan and Hate Jesus |
Dipstick wrote:
Second try, something knocked me off-line
There's no reason for you to be unable to
compose emails offline. Learn how, so you
can quit whining about your own failures in
lieu of making valid points.
...I don't even own a gun...
That doesn't matter when you hire killers to
put contracts on innocents.
... No, he
ordered others to do it. ...
So if someone puts out a contract on you,
they haven't done you any harm, to you?
... Americans attacked Iraq ...
Bush deceived many, to invade and terrorize
Iraq so his oil-baron pals could cash in on their
ongoing, inhumane corruption.
Possibly some mis-information
Whatever would you mean by 'possibly'?
It was *definitely* misinformation.
Or don't you have any ethics via which to discern?
Corrector:
So if you order a contract hit on somebody's toddler,
and you pay someone to go kill the little kiddie, then
the payee who wouldn't do so otherwise kills a child
due solely to your offer of money for it, would it mean
you were innocent entirely of the crime, in your opinion,
if you merely sat back elsewhere as it were committed?
Saddam and his government were not innocent little kiddies
As far as any threat to you, they were.
You exemplify hypocrisy in not going after, say, Mugabe.
Dipstick:
Our troops were, and they were NOT involved in
"terrorizing" anyone,
Corrector:
So you figure the Iraqi victims weren't afraid?
Whether or not *fear* was involved has NOTHING to do with it
You are mistaken.
Bush terrorized those people to steal their oil from them.
That's what his invasion and slaughter of helpless innocents
was intended to do.
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims
You weren't aware of the way that's been done to Iraqis?
Perhaps you should consider actually reading the news.
Legitament [sic] military action
That'd require a legitimate CIC, and you don't have one.
All you have is a deserter criminal usurper who lies to you.
attempts to minimize civilian casualties as
You figure cluster bombs to Baghdad would qualify? Why?
...the
enemy ...
You merely fell for Bush's conspiracy theories.
The Iraqis weren't your enemies before, although they have
every right to be your enemies now, since you attacked them
for no good reason.
Even legitament [sic] military action ...
Legitimate military actions aren't those based on lies.
That leaves the Bush invasion of Iraq out.
Corrector:
Do you have any working definition of 'terrorism',
Yes,
Prove it.
Corrector:
and, if so, any means of excluding Bush's attacks
on Iraq and Afghanistan from it?
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims
Those killed in Iraq were killed deliberately, yet they were
totally innocent of any crime whatsoever against the USA.
Corrector:
Do you believe that you should retaliate against
people who weren't even involved, when you
perceive that you are under attack? Why?
We aren't in a "War Against THE Terrorists of 9-11"
You want to make sure Bush gets away with it, don't you.
, our war is called
"The War On TERRORISM" such INCLUDES anti-Israel terrorists, such as
Saddam supported.
Why are you pretending you'd be protecting Israelis, when
you merely wish to exploit them?
Your war is a sham, a lie, a disgrace, a slap to Jesus' face.
Is that what you love about it so much, servant of Satan?
Because being Americans, we believe US reporters (US News =propganda)
Yet US reporters have reported falsehoods.
Why aren't you able to question the questionable?
Besides, the reports of deliberate targetting of civilians are in.
Hadn't you noticed that, either?
Corrector:
Do you have no idea whatsoever what cluster bombs
happen to be?
Yes, used to flush out AlQuaida in Afghanistan, and to destroy
bunkers, waaay out in the middle of nowhere
You are mistaken.
Cluster bombs are being used to kill civilians, mostly children,
in suburban areas.
Hint: they aren't bunker-busters at all. Look it up for once.
Corrector:
Do you not realize the extent of the use of such munitions
in entirely civilian areas of Baghdad, for but one example?
Wrong country
It's where the oil Bush wants happens to be.
It's also where the children were bombed as I've mentioned.
Dipstick lies for his boss the Devil:
AND we aren't stealinng anyone's resources....
Corrector:
You have evidence that the oil proceeds, the earnings from
the repairs to Bush-caused damage, would be going, somehow,
to the people of Iraq, as they should?
Our honor, we presented our promises publically, and to the whole
world
You don't have any real evidence at all, then, do you.
Please be sure to present this evidence.
Do so right here.
Just did.
Why would you imagine that?
...you are the one trying to make Our good deed into something
*evil*...
You think it'd be a good deed for you to blow the arms
off of little boys, after making them watch their families
get killed, then stealing from their remaining relatives?
Why?
No wonder you adore Bush and Satan so very much.
You'd notice that Bush is a lying, greedy criminal.
So now the USA is a lying, greedy criminal.
That's a non sequitur.
Bush is *not* the USA. He's merely a criminal abusing it.
You'd observe that Bush is making money on thefts, hate, and killings.
And now the USA is making money on thefts, hate, and killings.
That's a non sequitur.
Bush is *not* the USA. He's merely a criminal abusing it.
[re: 9/11]
When you observed those horrific deaths, did you decide then and
there that you never wanted to see a proper investigation, never
wanted to see any justice done for the victims/survivors, never
wanted to see those who brought it on make any reparations?
Terrorist are they who delibrately [sic]
Bush is a terrorist, who wanted 9/11 and benefitted from it more
than anyone else.
Something should be done.
That doesn't mean going around whacking helpless innocent
people who had *nothing* *whatsoever* to do with the crimes.
Saddam supported anti-Israel TERRORISTS
That's *irrelevant* to investigation and justice for 9/11, even if
it isn't mere malarkey.
Loyal Americans believe OUR news, TRAITORS believe the news which
Anti-Americans present, which do YOU accept ???
I don't believe in that anti-American traitor Bush, because I am
a patriot, not interested in supporting treason.
[re: Your ignorance is not an excuse for your crimes, especially not
complicity in war crimes.]
The Victor brings "war crimes" charges on the loser, we WON, you are
***** out of luck
So you believe that might would make right.
You enjoy spitting on Jesus, don't you.
No one set out to "slaughter" any "helpless innocent people"
Okay Pollyanna, believe whatever you must, in your fear.
you are
making out that the collateral damage was larger than it was, and that
it was deliberate, which isn't true
Prove it.
Oh, that's right, you never prove anything you try to claim.
You couldn't so much as pause to request that your idol
Bush provide some real evidence.
You still haven't even discerned that he had none.
I am concerned for you, that you don't get enough oxygen
to whatever may be available to you as a cerebrum.
We knew, guess how
You knew there were WMD's before Bush's invasion?
That's odd, those who were there knew otherwise.
They found a number of mobile WMDs labs in which such weapons were
made
You believe that tripe because you're stupid, right?
Are you attempting to claim that you somehow saw the first
plane hit the WTC, as Bush has attempted to claim?
We all did, over and over again
You are mistaken.
Figure it out if you gain the ability to do so.
http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ/agp/free/9-11/firstplane.htm
Why hasn't a 9/11 investigation produced anything at all yet?
When, if ever, will it be time for a proper official examination
of this event, to you?
So if you get mugged at gunpoint, you immediately break in to
a nearby home and stomp a helpless innocent toddler to death,
and you claim you'd actually somehow done something about
the initial mugging?
Saddam and his government are far from being "innocent toddlers"
Yet they're by no means any threat to anyone in the USA, and
they're not the ones being maimed, killed, sickened, starved,
and robbed over in Iraq.
So we are corrupted, because he is OUR puppet
Speak for yourself.
More voters chose the other guy.
[re: It's PNAC using the equivalent of Operation Northwoods, actually ...]
Public Nancy Association & Company ?
I suggest you do your homework. You lose even more if you don't.
You're the one eager to attack people who have done you
no harm, because you're too afraid to find out who really did
do the crimes of 9/11.
Glen Xian Dipstick worships his idol Bush for the killings:
To be answered later ...
Promises, promises ...
Your cult involves human sacrifice, doesn't it.
Satan's eager little servant, Glen Xian Dipstick, polluted
the Usenet yet again, with advertisements of his lack
of awareness, comprehension, and information, and
his morbid willingness to attempt to force others into
his irrational cult at gunpoint:
On Sun, 08 Jun 2003 10:10:40 -0400, no ... wrote:
christianmystic@ev1.net (Glenn (Christian Mystic)) wrote:
no wrote:
John W <john_w@yahoo.com> wrote:
Go away, Al Quaida!
Do you believe you'd be in contact with them?
I suggest you contact the authorities, don't be such a traitor.
Getting back to reality, excluding poor deluded John W and any
other misguided ignorant/stupid bloodthirsty cult fundy without the
wherewithal to think critically:
When you offer unquestioning obedience to criminals who involve
you in more crimes as a result, haven't you signed on to their cult?
The cause of fighting terrorism has next to nothing to "obeying
criminals
It has nothing to do with Bush's invasions and terrorisms
of innocents in other nations to steal their resources, either.
Bush wasn't there.
So what?
He ordered that invasion, and he did that based on *lies*,
and without regard for the ethical reality of the situation.
So if you order a contract hit on somebody's toddler,
and you pay someone to go kill the little kiddie, then
the payee who wouldn't do so otherwise kills a child
due solely to your offer of money for it, would it mean
you were innocent entirely of the crime, in your opinion,
if you merely sat back elsewhere as it were committed?
Our troops were, and they were NOT involved in
"terrorizing" anyone,
So you figure the Iraqi victims weren't afraid?
Do you have any working definition of 'terrorism',
and, if so, any means of excluding Bush's attacks
on Iraq and Afghanistan from it?
Do you believe that you should retaliate against
people who weren't even involved, when you
perceive that you are under attack? Why?
and AVOIDED harming civilians to the best of
their ability.
Why would anyone believe that?
Do you have no idea whatsoever what cluster bombs
happen to be?
Do you not realize the extent of the use of such munitions
in entirely civilian areas of Baghdad, for but one example?
AND we aren't stealinng anyone's resources....
You have evidence that the oil proceeds, the earnings from
the repairs to Bush-caused damage, would be going, somehow,
to the people of Iraq, as they should?
Please be sure to present this evidence.
Do so right here.
So how
about trying to talk about the real world ?
You could do it if you'd quit living in your brutal, ignorant fantasyland.
You'd notice that Bush is a lying, greedy criminal.
You'd observe that Bush is making money on thefts, hate, and killings.
Why do you worship George Bush?
Except for him doing the will of the American people
Those he has deceived with his lies?
No, those who observed 9-11,
When you observed those horrific deaths, did you decide then and
there that you never wanted to see a proper investigation, never
wanted to see any justice done for the victims/survivors, never
wanted to see those who brought it on make any reparations?
those insisting that something be done,
That doesn't mean going around whacking helpless innocent
people who had *nothing* *whatsoever* to do with the crimes.
those who watched US NEWS-REPORTS, presented by US REPORTERS covering
You don't have any idea what "propaganda" happens to be,
now do you. Your ignorance is not an excuse for your crimes,
especially not complicity in war crimes.
the situation in the Taliban,
The big energy barons wanted a pipeline in Afghanistan.
You had no idea about that, did you.
It's the way you had no idea how fond the Bush family is,
and has been for generations, of the Nazis.
and later as concerning the "NEVER ENDING" Investigations by the UN
You were in so much of a hurry to start slaughtering those
helpless innocent people, you couldn't so much as pause
to request that your idol Bush provide some real evidence.
You still haven't even discerned that he had none.
I am concerned for you, that you don't get enough oxygen
to whatever may be available to you as a cerebrum.
inspectors who were blocked from finding the WMDs which we knew they
were hiding...
You knew?
Have you provided your information to the authorities?
They haven't found anything yet, it's important that you do so.
We all watched the SAME NEWS that BUSH WATCHED,,,,
Some people don't even have television sets, yet somehow
you want to pretend you'd be representative of them.
Are you attempting to claim that you somehow saw the first
plane hit the WTC, as Bush has attempted to claim?
http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ/agp/free/9-11/firstplane.htm
And screamed "ABOUT
TIME !!!"
Why hasn't a 9/11 investigation produced anything at all yet?
When, if ever, will it be time for a proper official examination
of this event, to you?
When Bush announced that we were ACTUALLY GOING TO DO
SOMETHING
So if you get mugged at gunpoint, you immediately break in to
a nearby home and stomp a helpless innocent toddler to death,
and you claim you'd actually somehow done something about
the initial mugging?
Bush voiced what MOST OF THE USA WANTED TO HEAR !!! HE VOICED
OUR<<<< desires
Only those of you cowering and wanting to shout "Seig Heil!" ...
If any one "lied" we lied TO BUSH !!!!
Speak for yourself.
*You're* a liar, all right, but Bush can't use you as an excuse.
and voicing our
veiws [sic] for us
You 'feel good' killing those helpless innocent women and children?
We didn't...
You support killing for fun and profit whenever you support Bush.
, Bush actually has next to nothing to do with it.
Well he merely serves as a puppet for corruption, but he does
damage thereas.
Did the
pharoahs build the pyramids ? You live in thhe [sic] past if you really
think that the War On Terrorism is all Bush
It's PNAC using the equivalent of Operation Northwoods, actually ...
... idiotic non-sense ...
You could do better if you'd start thinking.
I am not the one with a few screws loose.
Prove it.
You're the one eager to attack people who have done you
no harm, because you're too afraid to find out who really did
do the crimes of 9/11.
You're willing to believe lies just to get to the slaughter faster.
It doesn't seem so great to have all these helpless vulnerable
innocent people seeing a 'born again' claim from their killers.
I'm not in favor of pollution, illness, poverty, or corporate crime,
either, so I can't support Bush when he promotes such.
I voted for Gore, but I doubt things would be much diferent if he had
won, the public outcry "DO SOMETHING" after 9-11, would have caused
Gore to ALSO yeild to the people (although the targets may not have
been the same), we would be fighting a War On Terrorism just the same.
Gore is not likely to have dropped the ball on bin Laden the way
bin Laden's business associate Bush did.
Cough, Bin Ladon [sic] is the enemy
Hack up that slimy phlegm of Bush slime you've gulped down
so very greedily, and take a deep breath.
Notice that you can't explain how bin Laden got Bush to stop
investigations, stand down the air defenses, or prevent people
from defending themselves from the threat he knew was there.
If Bush hadn't stolen the office Gore won, 9/11 couldn't have
happened, and the WTC would still be there.
Only if Gore ended our "love affair" with Israel,
There's such a thing as tough love.
Didn't you know that, either?
I've described it to you, right in front of your eyes, before.
the bombing of the WTC was in the making LONG BEFORE it was ever
built, it was just a convientiate [sic] target available after the terrorist [sic]
had become organized, and financed enough to carry something that big
off, 9-11 was in the making since May 8, 1948, it was just a matter of
time before the anti-Israeli terrorist attacked Israel's greates [sic]
SUPPORTER
You seem convinced that Israel instigated 9/11.
Why do you hold that belief?
Had you ever actually seen any evidence for it?
I doubt Gore would have ended our support of Israel (THE reason that
9-11 took place)
The real reason was that PNAC needed an Operation Northwoods,
but you don't know enough to know any better than to believe the
lies you get told.
Gore served under Clinton, who voiced a desire to "get Saddam" as
well, but was too bizy on the home front covering his *****, {almost
literally}, to be able to do much of anything else.
Why would anyone believe that?
Clinton's remarks concerning Saddam and Iraq have been widely
published
Why would anyone claim that the situation in Iraq would be identical
in 2003 to that of 1998?
Aren't you aware that bioweapons don't last all that long on the shelf?
Sheer ignorance ... ?
No, that would be the only reason in which someone would not believe
it
On what basis, if any, do you attempt to make that claim?
I can't be into taking from the poor to further enrich the wealthy,
or the powerful attacking and harming the vulnerable and weak.
Very true
That's why one doesn't support Bush.
Not supporting Bush, II am supporting the War On Terrorism,
Why do you believe that's what it would be?
You're gullible, and easily duped, aren't you.
and have
faith that the US troops are doing the right thing
No doubt you'd have believed the same of Hitler's armies.
The Bush family which you idolize so much sure did.
I don't admire those who murder journalists to hide war crimes,
So how many times have UFOs abducted you ?
You've gone quite confused and dishonest, haven't you.
The US forces attacked a hotel containing only journalists,
You mean SADDAM'S reporters ??
No.
Apparently you remain utterly uninformed about reality.
That's so very sad and sorry for you.
"http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EF07Ak04.html
Jun 7, 2003
Pressure grows over US killing of journalists
By Ian Urbina
On April 8, two journalists were killed in Baghdad. By this date, only weeks
into the conflict, the death toll for journalists in Iraq was an alarming
10, more than double the total killed in the entirety of the first Gulf War
in 1991. But what was especially worrisome about the deaths of Ukraine-born
Reuters cameraman, Taras Protsyuk, and Spanish photographer Jose Couso, was
that neither man was near the front lines.
Both were in their hotels. Alongside roughly 100 other journalists from
virtually every major international news outlet in the country at the time,
Protsyuk and Couso were recouping in an officially recognized safe zone -
the Palestine Hotel. But an American tank on the opposite bank of the Tigris
River, roughly three-quarters of a mile away, fired directly at the hotel
anyway. The US military stated that the incident was a regrettable though
unavoidable mistake. However, with the recent release of an investigation by
the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists there is new evidence
that the incident was in fact entirely avoidable, and a Spanish judge is
being asked to file formal extradition charges against the responsible three
US military officers.
The defendants are Lieutenant Colonel Philip DeCamp, commander of the Fourth
Battalion 64th Armored Regiment of the Third Infantry Division; Captain
Philip Wolford, company commander of the tank unit that fired on the hotel;
and Sergeant Shawn Gibson, the officer who asked Wolford for permission to
fire and received it.
The Pentagon has claimed that the tank fire was a purely defensive move.
Specifically, military spokeswoman Victoria Clarke wrote the committee a
week after the event, stating that "coalition forces were fired upon and
acted in self defense by returning fire". At the time of the incident, US
forces were attempting to find and kill an Iraqi "spotter" who was believed
to be watching American troop movements and relaying the information back to
snipers scattered throughout the city.
But interviews with more than a dozen eye-witnesses at the hotel tell a
different story. The unanimous rendition given to the investigators was that
no shots of any sort were fired from the hotel. Some of the most damning
evidence came in the investigation from Associated Press reporter Chris
Tomlinson, who was embedded with the Fourth Battalion. Tomlinson was waiting
in Baghdad at a military facility and therefore had access to a military
radio. He followed the entire incident closely, listening to the full
conversations between company members, as well as between a commander and
his superiors.
While listening to events unfold, Tomlinson, who served with the army for
seven years, was approached by Colonel David Perkins, the commander of the
Second Brigade of the Third Infantry. Perkins, too, was following events on
the military radio, and he expressed concern that US tank personnel might
decide to fire on the Palestine Hotel. Perkins decided to ask Tomlinson to
help more clearly identify the hotel so as to prevent it from being hit.
Tomlinson agreed to help and called the AP office in Doha, Qatar, to find
out what the hotel looked like. Soon after, Tomlinson tried to relay the
message to the journalists in the hotel, asking them to hang sheets out the
windows. Unfortunately, it was too late. At this very moment, the tank
commander, having seen someone with binoculars at the hotel, and assuming
that this person was the Iraqi spotter, asked and received permission to
fire on the Palestine Hotel.
Immediately after the hotel was hit one of the commanding officers,
Lieutenant Colonel Philip, started screaming over the radio. "Who just shot
the Palestinian [sic] Hotel? Did you just fucking shoot the Palestinian
Hotel?" Shortly afterward, Perkins reiterated the policy that no one was to
shoot the hotel under any circumstances.
One thing that the recent investigation makes quite clear is that it would
be difficult to mistake the Palestine Hotel. It was known to all. On the
other side of the world, anyone who watched even five minutes of war
coverage knew that virtually the entire international press corps was
headquartered at this location. The video and reporting feeds coming from
the rooftops and balconies at this spot were constant. On the facade of the
building facing the tank, the name of the hotel was written in huge letters.
The 14-story building is by far the tallest on the skyline. There is only
one other building nearly as tall, and it, too, was a militarily off-limits
hotel. With the naked eye, and no help from distance-vision technology that
are standard in most US tanks, the Palestine Hotel is apparent.
Investigators drove this point home by commissioning a photographer to take
pictures, included in the recent report, from where the tank fired. The
hotel could not be clearer in these photographs.
After the incident, the Spanish government called the deaths a tragic error
but also stated that it accepted the official US explanation. Despite
opposition from more than 90 percent of the Spanish population, the
country's Prime Minister, Jose Aznar, staunchly backed the US-led invasion
of Iraq. Since then Aznar has continued to dismiss the incident at the
Palestine Hotel.
However, the Spanish judiciary may have something else to say about the
matter now that evidence seems clearly to indicate avoidable error. In the
coming weeks, Spanish investigative magistrate Guillermo Ruiz de Polanco
will decide whether there are sufficient grounds for a trial.
Under the Geneva Convention, firing on media facilities is unequivocally
illegal. In a court of law, be it international jurisprudence or otherwise,
neither accident nor the perception of nearby threat stands as just cause or
sufficient excuse for such action. Of course, American soldiers do not
operate under these concerns. They are exempt from such battle-field
limitations. But for the rest of the world, for which violations of UN
resolutions and breaches of international law can have dire consequences,
pursuing this case is important. If nothing else, honest disclosure of
wrongdoing and proper procedure in accordance with law are owed to the
family of the deceased. Washington would likely agree if the tank had been
Iraqi, and the victims American journalists..."
GOOD !!!
So, you have no functional concept of war crimes. That
must be why you keep supporting that war criminal Bush.
(BTW heard that was an ACCIDENT)
Why do you automatically believe any rumor tossed
at you?
***Dipstick's cowardly deletion restored***
after attacking a basically defenseless nation to rob it.
I feel that the USA should represent freedom, not a police state,
and serve as an example of responsible behavior not criminality.
"To who much is given, much is to be expected"
I see a decent proper religion as something people adopt of their
own will as preferable, not something imposed at gunpoint.
Sometimes, that is the only way.
***Dipstick's cowardly deletion restored***
Why would anyone but a terrorist make such a claim?
Seems you don't know the meaning of the term
Why would you claim that, except for your dishonesty?
You have claimed that you believe sometimes the only
way is to impose your cult on others at gunpoint.
Do you believe Jesus had told you to terrorize others thusly?
Yes there are far too many sorry blown-up dismembered burned
babies in Iraq now, because Bush thinks he deserves their oil.
Now you are a mind-reader ?
One needn't be: it's called reasoning.
Nope,
You just haven't managed to notice all those lucrative, non-bid,
oil-related contracts awarded to Bush's corrupt cronies, have you.
You sure don't notice much of anything, ever, do you.
without mind-reading abilities its called GUESSING, lying is to
say something you BELIEVE untrue, with the PURPOSE of deception.
Are you trying to explain why you believe every lie Bush tells you,
in your haste to see helpless innocent people get slaughtered?
One can be WRONG, as to say "The earth is flat", but NOT be lying
because he/she BELIEVES that the earth is flat, and has no DESIRE to
deceive
So what?
Bush knows he's lying to you, he's hoping you stay ignorant enough
to believe his lies, too.
To actually know what someone BELIEVES TRUE, and to know if they
DESIRE to deceive.... one MUST have the ability to READ MINDS
Hardly.
Bush either knew his Iraqi nuke 'documentation' was a poor forgery,
or he's remarkably clueless, and about things of importance.
Which is it, dipstick, is your idol Bush an ignoramus, a liar, or both?
Get it ???
Many have known all along of the Bush ties to fascism and crime.
Why don't you get anything of reality?
You should try it if you can.
I can't read minds, now I might say "so and so is WRONG" but I cannot
honestly say "so and so is lying", and NOR can you.
Bush has been either lying or abysmally stupid.
Take your pick, Dipstick.
Either way, he's unsuitable for the office he usurped with
all that stolen Enron money.
Those of us old enough to know better realize that is wrong,
as is letting profiteer evangeliars push their opiate onto kids
having no arms left with which to fend them off, lying in the
hospitals without electricity and water, much less supplies.
Yeah Saddam's military had no compassion for his own people, they blew
everythhing [sic] up, and ran away, just terrible
Bush's troops did more damage, but you aren't keeping track, are you.
I was keeping track, in accordance to US news.
Prove it.
If you believe Abrian / French newscoverage, you are both unAmerican
and a fool, IMO
It's your opinion that's un-American.
You're a traitor to believe, much less promote, lies that harm Americans.
Do you have *any* working definition of "war crimes", or did
everything the Bush heroes the Nazis do have your approval?
They are dead and gone, let's focus on the 21st century
They live on in their sycophants the Bush crime family.
And the UFOs last abducted you, when ?
You're merely indulging in your falsehoods because you can't
comprehend that to this day some people are supporting Nazi
principles, and that the Bush family is among their number.
Pay some attention to reality.
Don't believe you, such would never be nominated, let alone ever
become President
You're so gullible.
What a shame you haven't enough sense to question
that which is so eminently questionable.
Are you really willing to throw away the Geneva Conventions
and everything they represent just to protect corruption?
You
I'm not the subject. Get a clue.
may have changed your name tag, but it isn't hard to tell who you
are, so I will ask you again, how much time did he serve for the
little girl which you claimed he "murdered" ???
No such claim was ever made.
Readers, such is why
It's a shame you can't read, Dipstick.
I never said Bush killed any 'little girl', that's your error.
Quote what actually I said, then read it for comprehension this time.
Hiya... "Anti-Christ....for Satan"
Your private emails to your best friends don't belong on newsgroups.
I'd typed:
"He exploded small animals with fireworks for thrills as a child."
This was reported by someone who was one of many eyewitnesses.
"He mocked a Christian before having her executed."
Her name was Karla Faye Tucker.
How much time did he serve for the child you claimed he executed ?
What child?
Can you get some remedial reading help?
Do you believe that your failure to find out what you should
would somehow excuse your complicity in crimes?
How much time did he serve for the child you claimed he executed ?
What child?
Can you get some remedial reading help?
Man, your credibility just went out the window.
Actually, everything I post is verifiable.
GOOD ! So...
So why are you still so ignorant?
More importantly, why are you still so eager to get people
robbed and killed for a vicious war criminal such as Bush?
How much time did he serve for the child you claimed he executed ?
What child?
Can you get some remedial reading help?
You just can't do that,
and you're desperate to pretend it'd be anyone else's problem
but your own. A Christian or a mystic wouldn't need to do that.
How much time did he serve for the child you claimed he executed ?
What child?
Can you get some remedial reading help?
Clearly, the rest of
what you have to say, isn't worth reading
So, you make unwarranted claims
So yours are warranted ?
Absolutely.
Notice that you can't show otherwise, not even once.
How much time did he serve for the child you claimed he executed ?
What child?
Can you get some remedial reading help?
based on your failures to be
responsible for your own state of ignorance. Some 'Christian'.
Some 'mystic'.
How much time did he serve for the child you claimed he executed ?
What child?
Can you get some remedial reading help?
<huge snip>
(That's how the cowards serving Satan hide from reality, here.)
"...when he was a kid, George W. enjoyed putting firecrackers into frogs, throwing
them in the air, and then watching them blow up. Should this be cause for alarm? How
relevant is a man's childhood behavior to what he is like as an adult? And in this
case, to what he would be like as president.. George's childhood friend, Terry
Throckmorton, openly and laughingly admits, "We were terrible to animals."
How much time did he serve for the child you claimed he executed ?
What child?
Can you get some remedial reading help?
Your credibility
That couldn't be at issue, if only you were honest.
Does your cult insist that you be clueless, or a liar?
doesn't give me any reason to check...(most likely
all made up, anyway)...
So you would rather support crimes than do any research.
You're so pathetic, really, a stumbling block for anyone
who'd consider you representative of your 'religion'.
http://www.bushbacklash.com/NewFiles/bushcharacter.html
How much time did he serve for the child you claimed he executed ?
What child?
Can you get some remedial reading help?
Think you can answer this now ?
Why can't you ask an honest question?
Are you really so very confused all the time?
You must be disoriented, or else merely a liar.
See above, you speak EXACTLY like the person in question, even the
VERY SAME arguments,,,,,
I'm not speaking, I'm typing.
You seem so very baffled and unable to cope.
Want me to present more ?
You've already displayed your gaping nether orifice
more than any decent rational person could have.
It's wrong to invade a country on false pretenses, target civilians,
Yeah, Saddam attacking his own country like that, horrible.
With support of such as Rumsfeld: hadn't you noticed?
No,
Then you simply haven't been paying attention.
I don't live in your fantasy world.
Your fantasy world is bleak and filled with children's screams and blood.
I already felt more than sorry for you, yet more so for your victims.
And then
we have idiots
You must be, to support those who set Saddam up in the first place.
I support REPENTENCE
Yet you can't even type it correctly, Dipstick.
Didn't you notice that Bush's church is telling him to repent,
and that he's not heeding his own denomination at all?
Why do you support that, is it your eagerness for the killings?
, people who change their minds for the better
have done GOOD
What Bush is doing isn't good, though.
Why can't you tell?
Have you no moral standards whatsoever?
like you believing THEIR propaganda, most likely from
that Arab TV channel, no doubt
You're prejudiced against Arabs, aren't you.
Nope, just against the other side, my best friends are American-Iraqis
Prove it.
cripple hospital and security services, get museums ransacked,
Yeah, those IRAQIS should have been...
....
They should have been protected, not attacked viciously for
no better reason than to steal their oil.
Nice accusation, who taught you what to say ?
It's no accusation, if you could read you'd know better than that, too.
It's a fact.
Bush attacked those people, removed their infrastructure, allowing
them to suffer as a result, because he wants control of their oil.
create lawlessness and such things, no matter who does it.
Yeah, we need to punish Saddam for his cruelity [sic] to his own people !
Yet you support those who set him up.
Why?
He repented !
Who?
He was WRONG to "set him up" (if he really had); so he
CORRECTED HIS MISTAKE,,,, Gosh, maybe he deserves a second term
You have absolutely no idea to whom you'd be referring, do you.
Did you forget, some of these ngs are Christ based, repentence
(changing one's way) is a GOOD THING
Then why do you support Bush as he refuses to repent the way
his own denomination has requested that he should?
You hate Jesus and love only Satan, don't you.
Do you claim that you'd love George W. Bush?
Loving someone means wanting that person to learn and be decent,
not wanting to see them get away with lying, cheating, stealing, and
killing, particularly not masses of completely helpless innocents.
So just WHEN did Bush PERSONALLY do any of these things
He personally lied, cheated, stole, and killed,
So when did he serve time for this ? (don't hold your breath for his
answer to this)
Are you really so ignorant as to believe that a crime has only
occurred in the event that it be successfully prosecuted after
the fact?
Why would anyone be so very ignorant as to believe such a
ridiculous thing?
Do you believe that all those people didn't suffer/die on 9/11?
about his criminal
drug abuse, with his insider trading at Harken (etc), and in his
executive capacity in government.
Not real attentive, are you.
Not interested, only into the here and now
Here and now, you idolize an unrepentant, malicious criminal,
and you're too lazy/incompetent to find out that's what he is.
surely you
have this on record somewhere.... errrr in truth are you blaming the
UK/US TROOPS ??? If ANY of this was "deliberately" done THEY DID IT
!!!
You're thrilled they hurt and killed all those women and children,
aren't you.
What women and children did they DELIBERATELY kill ?
Not one person of those hurt and killed in Iraq had been shown
to be guilty of anything that would have merited summary execution.
Did you deliberately miss the point, or are you THAT dense ?
You enjoy the killings, don't you.
You want them so much you'll start without any valid excuse.
Loving someone doesn't mean encouraging that person to empower
looters and druglords and terrorists.
WOW, so you are suggesting that we LOVE Saddam ?
Learn how to read, if you can.
Saddam did the above things
Cite?
Oh, that's right, you liars never can back up anything you try to claim.
I say you need to try tough love for a change.
What say you?
Tough love is what we gave to the Iraqis
No, that was your hatred, which seems all that you have.
Hatred is all you spew
You imagine it'd be hatred that has me telling you to stop killing children?
You're a perverted, evil-loving, hate-filled monster, in that, aren't you.
... false propaganda ...
You believed all those Bush lies about WMDs, didn't you.
I believe US REPORTERS,
The ones that told you Jessica Lynch was shot up?
and what they were saying at, and previous to,
the time, WHICH BUSH MERELY PARROTED (strange that you didn't know
this order of events)
So you'll kill for someone you feel is merely a poorly-informed parrot?
That's awful damn eager to kill, for you, isn't it?
Ever wonder why all those millions of people are taking to the
streets, to tell you that war is not a first resort,
Out of the world's population of how many BILLIONS ???
Oh so you want to claim none of those who had to stay home
happened to agree with the protesters?
I am saying that most needed go because they weren't against the war,
yes !
Is English not your first language, or were you 'educated' in the USA?
Why can't you validate any of your attempted claims, at all?
You're such a faker.
Your "millions" is a MINORITY
Why would anyone imagine that?
Errr because it is, 8,000,000,000 vrs ?,000,000s, yeap, looks like a
minority to me.
Why would you imagine that?
to remind you
not to repeat your mistakes of Viet Nam ad nauseam?
Dif war, dif time
Not a war, a big mistake, being repeated so that arms dealers
can cash in, and you love all the innocents getting killed, too.
Why do you want to repeat mistakes, is it for the bloodshed?
Does it turn you on to know that women and children are killed?
Can you realize that they're not by any stretch of the imagination
all from the same group or belief system or political category, from
an ability to observe the sheer diversity of their populous ranks?
Do you have the ability to comprehend that more intelligent choices
exist than to offer only violent physical assault and robbery rather
than diplomacy, honest negotiation, and commerce?
Are you logical enough to understand that the rejection of war is not
in any way any form of support for any enemy whatsoever, avoiding
the mistake of assuming there'd be no other possibilities?
Why are you trying to hide from the above refutation of
your attempted claim?
Nothing nothing SUPPORTS they who need STOPPED
...more emotional tripe of an unpatriotic LOSER...
If you could do better, you'd be able to serve the ideals of Jesus.
What a shame you can't, so far.
On this, you have no room to talk, before trying to get the speck out
of my eye, your eye needs tending
As you say that around the virgin timber obscuring your corneas ...
Can you inform me as to when it was that the people of Iraq
attacked or even threatened the people of the USA?
The War on Terrorism is against they who support terrorism, even if
not directed at the USA, your question is based on a false premise.
You err, yet again.
Can you inform me as to when it was that the people of Iraq
attacked or even threatened the people of the USA?
Irrelivant [sic] , they supported terrorists against Israel,
Are you hoping you can bomb Palestinian women and children, too?
learn to read...
here let me say it AGAIN...
Can you inform me as to when it was that the people of Iraq
attacked or even threatened the people of the USA?
To some people, 'untidyness' would be an unmade bed or a
few dishes left unwashed in the sink. To Rumsfeld,
WOW, someone other than Bush ???
Rumsfeld is part of the Bush crime organization.
Hadn't you noticed?
Well, hadn't you?
... few nerons [sic] ...
Is that your excuse for being such a liar?
I have stated what I believe to be true, without any
You're without any substantiation for anything you've tried to claim.
Are you trying to make Xians all look like gullible ignorant dupes, or
do you merely do that entirely unwittingly?
desire to
deceive...
You don't realize what all Bush stands to gain for deceiving you about
9/11, about Afghanistan, about Iraq, et cetera, do you.
Should I copy you, and call you a "liar" because from my point of view
YOU ARE WRONG ???
I'd be so very happy and pleased if you could merely prove me wrong.
Your desire to indulge in mere feeble namecalling is just your problem.
... Try including over 70 % of the US
population, and you will be accurate ...
The number duped by Bush's lies, eh ...
Still want to put the cart before the horse, Bush only ECHOED what the
USA news reporters were ALREADY saying.
Bush claimed Iraq was after nukes, based on a forgery.
Bush FINALLY AGREED WITH
THE PEOPLE !
Why are you so dishonestly attempting to pretend you'd represent
people whom you do not in fact represent?
There are 9/11 victims/survivors who don't agree with you at all.
Why do you want to see them suffer even more than they have?
You must be so filled with hate.
it's rampant
looting and lawlessness in a defenseless innocent country he's
bombed in order to rob it. Do you dismiss such atrocities thusly?
Just where exactly are the 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' that
Bush tried to claim would be a 'reason' for his terrorist invasion
of the sovereignty of Iraq?
One of many reasons, the greatest being Saddam's support of terrorist
groups, mainly those against ISRAEL
Why would you imagine those would be reasons at all?
Because they are,
Why would anyone imagine that?
Do you believe you should bomb every Palestinian who'd be
able to strap on a bomb and retaliate for being attacked by
the forces the US has supported in Israel, too?
and
they who ordered 9-11 stated straight out that they attacked us
because we SUPPORT ISRAEL
Who 'ordered' it, according to you?
You claim to have knowledge that the authorities don't claim to have,
so I suggest you offer it to them immediately.
Why have the oil facilities been protected,
For the Iraqis, and the world's needs (including, of course, our own)
Why do you feel you'd need to steal the oil proceeds from the Iraqis?
I don't see any theft in getting paid for your services, maybe they
should stop your paycheck and make you work for free
So you'd blow up your neighbor's house, with his family in it, and then
make him pay you to rebuild it?
while the museums,
Our troops were busy elsewhere, while the Iraqis looted THEMSELVES
Can't you back up anything you try to claim?
Were you blind when they showed the Iraqis looting themselves, or did
you just close your eyes ?
How did they arrange for the US troops to force the protectors away?
Do explain that.
hospitals, and homes have been destroyed?
Hadn't you heard ? There was a WAR going on
There was no war declared.
Irrelivant,
Why would anyone imagine that?
Do you particularly relish torture of prisoners, after refusing them POW status?
and yes the War On Terrorism was DECLARED and IS supported
by the US Congress
Why would anyone believe that?
You are lying, as usual.
You must be deceptive, as your master Satan insists.
Yeap, you are the same guy who accused Bush of killing a little girl
alright
You are either mistaken, or lying.
Just how much crime and damage will you support because you
are too lazy or ignorant to do any better?
That was why we were there, to end terrorism
Why would anyone believe that?
Can't you explain?
Do you believe that you should attack and kill civilians in revenge
for someone else having attacked and killed civilians?
Nope, I believe we should avoid killing civilians as much as possibble
WHILE destroying the enemy.... As we had done
Why would anyone believe that?
Can't you answer?
... more non-sense, and referances [sic] to more Anti-American
propaganda...
Why would you believe such things, and support that traitor Bush?
Can't you answer?
Notice that the Jew-Hating Grahams are involved, to extract
resources from the victims indulging their rampant antisemitism.
Strange, it was Saddam's support of anti-Israel terrorists that caused
us to attack him
Why would anyone believe that?
Can't you answer?
As a Jew, I see Bush as repenting for his family's past (if your
claims about their Nazi involvement, is to be believed)
Why would anyone believe that?
Can't you answer?
... more crap ...
It's all you have, isn't it.
And all you have is "Why would anyone believe that ?" Quite
meaningless really.
You seem so very eager to believe lies that get people killed.
You must be so filled with hate.
...regurgitated vomit...
It's all you have, isn't it.
You've failed, on so many levels, to be honest or decent.
You can step aside and allow those more responsible to deal with this:
When you offer unquestioning obedience to criminals who involve
you in more crimes as a result, haven't you signed on to their cult?
Why do you worship George Bush? Is it because he'd like you to
believe he'd be chosen by God, or because perhaps you believe
that his associate the Rev Moon is the second coming of Christ?
Well the looters think he's wonderful, too, that's for sure, and they're
the handful of people cheering for him, as no one else does, in Iraq.
For myself, my religion prevents me from worshipping those who
tell lies to get people killed to steal their stuff, as I love all people.
To me, it's not good at all to force the rest of the world to see
Americans as evil, greedy, thieving malicious murderous thugs.
It doesn't seem so great to have all these helpless vulnerable
innocent people seeing a 'born again' claim from their killers.
I'm not in favor of pollution, illness, poverty, or corporate crime,
either, so I can't support Bush when he promotes such.
I can't be into taking from the poor to further enrich the wealthy,
or the powerful attacking and harming the vulnerable and weak.
I don't admire those who murder journalists to hide war crimes,
after attacking a basically defenseless nation to rob it.
I feel that the USA should represent freedom, not a police state,
and serve as an example of responsible behavior not criminality.
I see a decent proper religion as something people adopt of their
own will as preferable, not something imposed at gunpoint.
Yes there are far too many sorry blown-up dismembered burned
babies in Iraq now, because Bush thinks he deserves their oil.
Those of us old enough to know better realize that is wrong,
as is letting profiteer evangeliars push their opiate onto kids
having no arms left with which to fend them off, lying in the
hospitals without electricity and water, much less supplies.
Do you have *any* working definition of "war crimes", or did
everything the Bush heroes the Nazis do have your approval?
Are you really willing to throw away the Geneva Conventions
and everything they represent just to protect corruption?
It's wrong to invade a country on false pretenses, target civilians,
cripple hospital and security services, get museums ransacked,
create lawlessness and such things, no matter who does it.
Do you claim that you'd love George W. Bush?
Loving someone means wanting that person to learn and be decent,
not wanting to see them get away with lying, cheating, stealing, and
killing, particularly not masses of completely helpless innocents.
Loving someone doesn't mean encouraging that person to empower
looters and druglords and terrorists.
I say you need to try tough love for a change.
What say you?
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/horsey/viewbydate.asp?id=824
http://regulareverydaypeople.com/
http://mindprod.com/iraq.html
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2842.htm
http://www.voice4change.org/stories/showstory.asp?file=030410~for.asp
http://paktribune.com/news/index.php?id=20060&PHPSESSID=158c9633509c91a9c2d72c38fd0064f0
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/horsey/viewbydate.asp?id=824
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20030411/wl_mideast_afp/iraq_war_baghdad_loot_shop_030411155239
Ever wonder why all those millions of people are taking to the
streets, to tell you that war is not a first resort, to remind you
not to repeat your mistakes of Viet Nam ad nauseam?
Can you realize that they're not by any stretch of the imagination
all from the same group or belief system or political category, from
an ability to observe the sheer diversity of their populous ranks?
Do you have the ability to comprehend that more intelligent choices
exist than to offer only violent physical assault and robbery rather
than diplomacy, honest negotiation, and commerce?
Are you logical enough to understand that the rejection of war is not
in any way any form of support for any enemy whatsoever, avoiding
the mistake of assuming there'd be no other possibilities?
Are you sufficiently cognizant to accept as valid the objections to war
of the people, of the unions and the churches, instead of falling into
the trap of belief in false propaganda that it'd be 'unpatriotic'?
Have you the intelligence to scoff at the irrationality of fascism and racism,
to acknowledge the full reality of human potential, to support the appropriate
environment, nurturance, education, information, and representation of people?
Or not?
If not, why not?
Please answer. Thank you in advance.
Oh, and now I have more questions to ask:
Can you inform me as to when it was that the people of Iraq
attacked or even threatened the people of the USA?
To some people, 'untidyness' would be an unmade bed or a
few dishes left unwashed in the sink. To Rumsfeld, it's rampant
looting and lawlessness in a defenseless innocent country he's
bombed in order to rob it. Do you dismiss such atrocities thusly?
Just where exactly are the 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' that
Bush tried to claim would be a 'reason' for his terrorist invasion
of the sovereignty of Iraq?
Why have the oil facilities been protected, while the museums,
hospitals, and homes have been destroyed?
Just how much crime and damage will you support because you
are too lazy or ignorant to do any better?
Do you believe that you should attack and kill civilians in revenge
for someone else having attacked and killed civilians?
Is it just fine with you if the survivors/victims of the crimes of 9/11 never see
any form of actual justice, only illegal warfare having nothing to do with it?
Ever wonder why so many Germans just sat back and let Hitler
have his way, supported as he was by the Bush family?
Have you any concept of personal responsibility, or of self-discipline, or do
you merely emulate those who use deceit and violence rather than reason?
Why are you doing this?
http://mindprod.com/iraq.html#PICTURES
Why are you ignoring this?
http://site.www.umb.edu/faculty/salzman_g/Strategy/Discussion/2002-10-26PaxAmericana.html
Notice that the Jew-Hating Grahams are involved, to extract
resources from the victims indulging their rampant antisemitism.
Those bigots will convince people that there's no end to the
crime spree of the Bush mob.
No one among the followers of Bush has any excuse for any
pretense of innocence when the resentment catches up.
Don't bother pretending that blowback would be initiation.
.
|
|
| User: "Glenn Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: "b" Re: Please, Tell Me Why You Love Bush and Satan and Hate Jesus |
04 Jul 2003 12:13:02 PM |
|
|
<snippage>
You're such a coward, as all Satan's minions have to be.
Corrector:
Do you not realize the extent of the use of such munitions
in entirely civilian areas of Baghdad, for but one example?
Wrong country
It's where the oil Bush wants happens to be.
It's also where the children were bombed as I've mentioned.
Claimed
It's fact. Why are you incapable of managing any facts?
Don't you have any resources at your disposal for awareness?
Dipstick lies for his boss the Devil:
AND we aren't stealinng anyone's resources....
Corrector:
You have evidence that the oil proceeds, the earnings from
the repairs to Bush-caused damage, would be going, somehow,
to the people of Iraq, as they should?
Our honor, we presented our promises publically, and to the whole
world
You don't have any real evidence at all, then, do you.
Protecting Our Honor is enough,
You have no honor, you murder helpless children, and steal
from their devastated families.
I take it that you never served in the
military, or in any governmental office.
You take it wrong, but your master Satan wants you that way.
Please be sure to present this evidence.
Do so right here.
Just did.
Why would you imagine that?
Can't you answer? Why don't you have any answers?
...you are the one trying to make Our good deed into something
*evil*...
You think it'd be a good deed for you to blow the arms
off of little boys, after making them watch their families
get killed, then stealing from their remaining relatives?
None of this is taking place other than collateral damage from legit
military actions
Why would anyone believe that?
Why?
No wonder you adore Bush and Satan so very much.
You'd notice that Bush is a lying, greedy criminal.
So now the USA is a lying, greedy criminal.
That's a non sequitur. Bush is *not* the USA.
Now APPLY this sudden knowledge of yours, so when they protest "Bush's
actions" just WHAT flag will they burn ?
The one you and Bush use to drag your messy backsides upon ...
YOU are calling the US / UK troops "lying, greedy, criminals"
That's false. Why do you lie, is it to please your master Satan?
YOU are calling the 70 plus % of the USA population who support what
is taking place "lying, greedy, criminals"
That's false. Why do you lie, is it to please your master Satan?
Everything you are accusing "Bush" of carrying out in Iraq, you are
accusing the USA of doing,
That's false. Why do you lie, is it to please your master Satan?
because WE are the ones doing these things
for the Honor of Our FLAG.
That's false. Why do you lie, is it to please your master Satan?
Bush is a MOUTH, and little ACTION,
That's false. Why do you lie, is it to please your master Satan?
Bush couldn't open his mouth to save a soul from 9/11.
His actions include the killings of thousands of innocents.
BUT the USA troops are "committing" these "crimes"
You must really admire the Nazis to worship their pal Bush.
You SAY "Bush" but I take it PERSONALLY
So? You're an idiot. You're being used, and you're supporting
those who harm you and everyone else you know, in your stupidity.
He's merely a criminal abusing it.
So PLEASE present his criminal record
He's been arrested more than once.
Didn't you know?
Oh, that's right, you don't know much of anything, you're too
scared/lazy/incompetent to find out.
You'd observe that Bush is making money on thefts, hate, and killings.
And now the USA is making money on thefts, hate, and killings.
That's a non sequitur.
Bush is *not* the USA. He's merely a criminal abusing it.
Who is physically carrying out these "thefts, hate, and killings" ?
You can't figure out much of anything at all, can you.
[re: 9/11]
When you observed those horrific deaths, did you decide then and
there that you never wanted to see a proper investigation, never
wanted to see any justice done for the victims/survivors, never
wanted to see those who brought it on make any reparations?
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
Why does ANYONE imagine a need for a "proper investigation" ?
So, you want the 9/11 perps to get away with it.
Who did it, is OBVIOUS. T E R R O R I S T S
Bush had the means, motive, and opportunity more than anyone else.
What a shame you can't discern the issues with PNAC, for example.
We are making "reparations" by going after the terrorists.
You're just killing kids and stealing, don't bother to pretend otherwise,
everyone with a brain around the world already knows better. You're
just making yourself and all you'd represent look really bad here.
Terrorist are they who delibrately [sic]
Bush is a terrorist, who wanted 9/11 and benefitted from it more
than anyone else.
So you claim / assert
So it is.
You can't deny he benefitted from it. He and his PNAC pals wanted it.
He's the one who stopped investigations and kept it all secret so that
his victims wouldn't be able to protect themselves.
You have no idea who John O'Neill was, either, do you.
Something should be done.
Something IS being done
Killing innocents is not justice for 9/11. Even the survivors/victims
have been saying so. Why do you despise all those people?
That doesn't mean going around whacking helpless innocent
people who had *nothing* *whatsoever* to do with the crimes.
Sure doesn't, so ?
So don't support Bush as he slaughters innocents.
Jesus wouldn't want you to do that.
Ever heard of Jesus? Or do you just hate him, too?
Saddam supported anti-Israel TERRORISTS
That's *irrelevant* to investigation and justice for 9/11, even if
it isn't mere malarkey.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
Loyal Americans believe OUR news, TRAITORS believe the news which
Anti-Americans present, which do YOU accept ???
I don't believe in that anti-American traitor Bush, because I am
a patriot, not interested in supporting treason.
You deceive yourself
You're merely lying yet again.
{Darn, you were doing so well, but...}
I'm still doing quite well.
Why are you doing so very poorly?
Have you no source for inner strength whatsoever?
<snipped redundancy>
And THAT ended that
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: "b" Re: Please, Tell Me Why You Love Bush and Satan and Hate Jesus |
05 Jul 2003 06:17:46 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 17:13:02 GMT, (Glenn
(Christian Mystic)) wrote:
<snippage>
Claimed
It's fact. Why are you incapable of managing any facts?
Your daydreams, and conspiracy theories are "facts", sure
Don't you have any resources at your disposal for awareness?
Yes, the US news
<snip>
You don't have any real evidence at all, then, do you.
Protecting Our Honor is enough,
You have no honor,
I see, the USA (Our) has no honor. Please, actually read what you are
responding to.
you murder helpless children,
Please present my police, and criminal record to back this up.
<snip>
Just did.
Why would you imagine that?
Can't you answer? Why don't you have any answers?
You ask a rhetorical question, one which deserves no answer.
...you are the one trying to make Our good deed into something
*evil*...
You think it'd be a good deed for you to blow the arms
off of little boys, after making them watch their families
get killed, then stealing from their remaining relatives?
None of this is taking place other than collateral damage from legit
military actions
Why would anyone believe that?
Another rhetorical question.
Why?
No wonder you adore Bush and Satan so very much.
You'd notice that Bush is a lying, greedy criminal.
So now the USA is a lying, greedy criminal.
That's a non sequitur. Bush is *not* the USA.
Now APPLY this sudden knowledge of yours, so when they protest "Bush's
actions" just WHAT flag will they burn ?
The one you and Bush use to drag your messy backsides upon ...
Can't answer ?
YOU are calling the US / UK troops "lying, greedy, criminals"
That's false.
IF any of your crap was valid, THEY are THE ones doing what you accuse
Bush of doing
Why do you lie, is it to please your master Satan?
I take it that you are a US citizen who can't accept what his nation
is doing, so you have found a scapegoat to blame.
Its called DENIAL, self-deception.
<snip>
because WE are the ones doing these things
for the Honor of Our FLAG.
That's false. Why do you lie, is it to please your master Satan?
Again, when they protest "Bush's actions" WHAT FLAG will they burn ?
Bush is a MOUTH, and little ACTION,
That's false. Why do you lie, is it to please your master Satan?
Bush couldn't open his mouth to save a soul from 9/11.
His actions include the killings of thousands of innocents.
BUT the USA troops are "committing" these "crimes"
You must really admire the Nazis to worship their pal Bush.
I am a Jew
You SAY "Bush" but I take it PERSONALLY
So? You're an idiot. You're being used, and you're supporting
those who harm you and everyone else you know, in your stupidity.
He's merely a criminal abusing it.
So PLEASE present his criminal record
He's been arrested more than once.
Didn't you know?
For the "crimes" YOU accuse him of ? Come on, present the evidence
Oh, that's right, you don't know much of anything, you're too
scared/lazy/incompetent to find out.
The ball is your park, if you want me to believe you.
You'd observe that Bush is making money on thefts, hate, and killings.
And now the USA is making money on thefts, hate, and killings.
That's a non sequitur.
Bush is *not* the USA. He's merely a criminal abusing it.
Who is physically carrying out these "thefts, hate, and killings" ?
You can't figure out much of anything at all, can you.
Why can't you answer, Who is PHYSICALLY carrying these things out ?
And with who's support ?
[re: 9/11]
When you observed those horrific deaths, did you decide then and
there that you never wanted to see a proper investigation, never
wanted to see any justice done for the victims/survivors, never
wanted to see those who brought it on make any reparations?
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
OK
<snip>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: "a" Re: Please, Tell Me Why You Love Bush and Satan and Hate Jesus |
04 Jul 2003 12:06:13 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 10:00:02 -0400, Kneel before Satan and Bush!
wrote:
Dipstick wrote:
Kneel before Satan and Bush! wrote:
Dipstick wrote:
Second try, something knocked me off-line
There's no reason for you to be unable to
compose emails offline.
When the computer ceases to function, no "emails" (posts to
newsgroups) can be composed until the computer is once more up and
running.
So quit breaking your computer and run it properly,
don't expect others to endure your garbage because
you can't manage to be responsible for yourself.
Learn how, so you
can quit whining about your own failures in
lieu of making valid points.
...I don't even own a gun...
That doesn't matter when you hire killers to
put contracts on innocents.
Please prove that I have hired these killers
You're giving that murderous crook Bush your
go-ahead to slaughter innocents in your name.
Survivors/victims of 9/11 haven't done so, so
why do you believe you should?
, and explain how I paid
them
You've paid by giving up your decency, your
dignity, and your rights as a US citizen, and
in return you've merely been robbed and
held up as a vicious sinner to the world.
... No, he
ordered others to do it. ...
So if someone puts out a contract on you,
they haven't done you any harm, to you?
Personally ? No !
So you don't feel that someone hiring a killer to take
you out would be a problem for you.
Again, you merely exemplify incapacity to reason.
... Americans attacked Iraq ...
Bush deceived many, to invade and terrorize
Iraq so his oil-baron pals could cash in on their
ongoing, inhumane corruption.
OPINIONS are just that OPINIONS
So why have you your false opinions but no facts?
Do you believe in a God who only lies to you?
Possibly some mis-information
Whatever would you mean by 'possibly'?
It was *definitely* misinformation.
SOME of it, but not all of it, most already accepted around the world.
Why would anyone imagine that?
Oh, that's right, you're mentally incompetent.
Or don't you have any ethics via which to discern?
Corrector:
So if you order a contract hit on somebody's toddler,
and you pay someone to go kill the little kiddie, then
the payee who wouldn't do so otherwise kills a child
due solely to your offer of money for it, would it mean
you were innocent entirely of the crime, in your opinion,
if you merely sat back elsewhere as it were committed?
Saddam and his government were not innocent little kiddies
As far as any threat to you, they were.
Terrorism...
That's Bush attacking innocents based on his lies and desire
to steal what is theirs.
Does your religion tell you to covet, and murder for it?
You exemplify hypocrisy in not going after, say, Mugabe.
WE can't be everywhere at once.
Christians were free to worship in Iraq before, but not now.
Have you no priorities at all?
I may not agree with my government's
priorities, but at least we are doing SOMETHING
That's no excuse for wrongdoing at all.
If some human bothers you, and you run over your cat,
that doesn't make it right because you did 'something'.
Dipstick:
Our troops were, and they were NOT involved in
"terrorizing" anyone,
Corrector:
So you figure the Iraqi victims weren't afraid?
Whether or not *fear* was involved has NOTHING to do with it
You are mistaken.
Terrorist are ...
Bush terrorized the people of Iraq by bombing them
when they were innocent of any wrongdoing, just so
his corrupt cronies could steal from them.
It's Bush's fascism, terrorism, and war crimes, and when
you support him in them you advertise your love for Satan.
Bush terrorized those people to steal their oil from them.
... "Bush" = USA...
You are mistaken.
Your idol Bush is a mere criminal, not equivalent in any way
to the entire country he happens to be abusing so terribly.
That's what his invasion and slaughter of helpless innocents
was intended to do.
Terrorist [sic] are they ...
Your poorly-wrought mindless drivel doesn't become
anything of any merit for you merely blathering it over
and over. Notice what the Bible says about that?
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims
You weren't aware of the way that's been done to Iraqis?
The US / UK troops did not do as you wish to claim.
You merely don't know. You're ignorant of far too much.
Perhaps you should consider actually reading the news.
Maybe you should stick to OUR news
Why do you want to swallow mere propaganda?
Are you too frightened to think?
Legitament [sic] military action
That'd require a legitimate CIC, and you don't have one.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
All you have is a deserter criminal usurper who lies to you.
attempts to minimize civilian casualties as
You figure cluster bombs to Baghdad would qualify? Why?
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
...the enemy ...
You merely fell for Bush's conspiracy theories.
The Iraqis weren't your enemies before, although they have
every right to be your enemies now, since you attacked them
for no good reason.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
Even legitament [sic] military action ...
Legitimate military actions aren't those based on lies.
And they weren't
You believe Saddam had nukes, or helped with 9/11?
Wow, are you stupid.
That leaves the Bush invasion of Iraq out.
Never took place.
Ask an Iraqi, or don't you consider them to be human?
You sure do hate Jesus.
Corrector:
Do you have any working definition of 'terrorism',
Yes,
Prove it.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
That's not a definition, that's merely your diarrhea.
Corrector:
and, if so, any means of excluding Bush's attacks
on Iraq and Afghanistan from it?
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims
Those killed in Iraq were killed deliberately, yet they were
totally innocent of any crime whatsoever against the USA.
Irrelivant, [sic]
Only to you hate-filled racist murderers and criminals ...
the War On Terrorism is just
It's Bush's lies, and you have no excuse for believing them.
THAT a war
There has been no war declared.
against they who
aid terrorist, support terrorists, train, encourage, and / or etc.
There's no evidence that they supported anyone who posed
any threat to you or any other person in the USA at all.
Why are you so stupid?
Are you brain damaged? Have you no moral support system?
There is NO requirement that such terrorism be directed at the USA
So you want to start bombing Ireland because the IRA might
attack the Brits?
Wow are you stupid.
Corrector:
Do you believe that you should retaliate against
people who weren't even involved, when you
perceive that you are under attack? Why?
We aren't in a "War Against THE Terrorists of 9-11"
You want to make sure Bush gets away with it, don't you.
I want to see terrorism put in its place !
Bush is putting terrorism into its place as his big cash cow.
You're getting gored by his bull, too. That's okay if you're
into getting hurt, but not okay for you to wish that on others.
, our war is called
"The War On TERRORISM" such INCLUDES anti-Israel terrorists, such as
Saddam supported.
Why are you pretending you'd be protecting Israelis, when
you merely wish to exploit them?
I am a Jew, maybe you might want to reword your accusation.
Why are you pretending you'd be protecting Israelis, when
you merely wish to exploit them?
Your war is a sham, a lie, a disgrace, a slap to Jesus' face.
We are all free to our OPINIONS
So why are you into a slap to Jesus' face?
Is that what you love about it so much, servant of Satan?
Nice dudge
There's nothing nice about you, you're a hatemonger.
You're an insult to God.
Because being Americans, we believe US reporters (US News =propganda)
Yet US reporters have reported falsehoods.
Yet anti-US reporters have reported falsehoods (truth is often
realitive; it depends on which side you are on, personally I fly the
Red, White, and Blue)
You use the flag as a diaper, it's obvious you're no patriot.
Letting liar crooks like Bush ruin your country makes you a traitor.
Why aren't you able to question the questionable?
I support my own People
Bush hurts your own people, you don't support them
unless you resist Bush.
, and trust them to do what is right for OUR
Honor
You have no honor, you are treasonous scum, for
your worship of that murdering crook Bush.
Besides, the reports of deliberate targetting of civilians are in.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
Hadn't you noticed that, either?
The anti-US press may have made such claims, I do not buy their
propaganda.
The facts are in, you're merely too frightened to notice them.
Why have you no source of true courage at all whatsoever?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: "a" Re: Please, Tell Me Why You Love Bush and Satan and Hate Jesus |
05 Jul 2003 05:12:51 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 17:06:13 GMT, (Glenn
(Christian Mystic)) wrote:
On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 10:00:02 -0400, Kneel before Satan and Bush!
wrote:
Dipstick wrote:
Kneel before Satan and Bush! wrote:
Dipstick wrote:
<snip>
Please prove that I have hired these killers
You're giving that murderous crook Bush your
go-ahead to slaughter innocents in your name.
We, the US population, gave no such permission, nor was such offered
as an option, but we did voice support for the War On Terrorism, which
is being carried out.
There is no "slaughter of innocents" which took place in our name.
Survivors/victims of 9/11 haven't done so, so
why do you believe you should?
No one has done as you claim, and such would include those
survivors/victoms
, and explain how I paid
them
You've paid
Who ? Please stick to the topic "hired killers"
<snip>
Personally ? No !
So you don't feel that someone hiring a killer to take
you out would be a problem for you.
Unrelated example.
Again, you merely exemplify incapacity to reason.
... Americans attacked Iraq ...
Bush deceived many, to invade and terrorize
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims, hi-jake
commercial modes of transportation, delibrately bomb places where
civilians gather, or use their own suicides in order to kill as many
civilians as possible; The idea being to sway the civilian population
to push for the terrorist desires in hopes of ending the terror caused
by the terrorist (although I can't see any signs that civilians have
ever been influenced in the way intended)
Legitament military action attempts to minimize civilian casualties as
much as possible while attacking military targets, and killing the
enemy(military), and taking prisoners, until the military goals are
gained
Iraq so his oil-baron pals could cash in on their
ongoing, inhumane corruption.
So you continually ASSERT
OPINIONS are just that OPINIONS
So why have you your false opinions but no facts?
All you can present is your OPINIONS
Do you believe in a God who only lies to you?
My God doesn't lie to me.
Possibly some mis-information
Whatever would you mean by 'possibly'?
It was *definitely* misinformation.
SOME of it, but not all of it, most already accepted around the world.
Why would anyone imagine that?
Oh, that's right, you're mentally incompetent.
WOW, just like YOU
<snip>
As far as any threat to you, they were.
Terrorism...
That's Bush attacking innocents based on his lies and desire
to steal what is theirs.
No innocents are being attacked, BTW Bush alone is not attacking
anyone, but AMERICANS attacked Iraq
Does your religion tell you to covet, and murder for it?
No
You exemplify hypocrisy in not going after, say, Mugabe.
WE can't be everywhere at once.
Christians were free to worship in Iraq before, but not now.
You don't know very much, do you ?
Have you no priorities at all?
Of course I do
I may not agree with my government's
priorities, but at least we are doing SOMETHING
That's no excuse for wrongdoing at all.
Like what ? I was talking about attacking the supporters of terrorism
in another order, like as before Iraq, I would have went after much
bigger fish. Never said that Iraq wasn't on my list.
If I had it my way, we would be in Africa, and Israel
If some human bothers you, and you run over your cat,
that doesn't make it right because you did 'something'.
Was THAT supposed to make any sense ?
<snip>
Terrorist are ...
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims, hi-jake
commercial modes of transportation, delibrately bomb places where
civilians gather, or use their own suicides in order to kill as many
civilians as possible; The idea being to sway the civilian population
to push for the terrorist desires in hopes of ending the terror caused
by the terrorist (although I can't see any signs that civilians have
ever been influenced in the way intended)
Bush terrorized the people of Iraq by bombing them
Car bombing ? Delibrately bombing places where civilians gather, with
no military/governmental target intended ? Hi-jaking transportation ?
If none of the above, no terrorism took place
And none did
when they were innocent of any wrongdoing, just so
his corrupt cronies could steal from them.
You have a rather poor sense of ethics
It's Bush's fascism,
Doesn't exist
terrorism,
Never existed
and war crimes,
Saddam is welcome to try to bring charges
and when
you support him in them you advertise your love for Satan.
Non-sense
Bush terrorized those people to steal their oil from them.
... "Bush" = USA...
You are mistaken.
Nope, America (USA, that is) is doing the acts which you are trying to
call crimes, murder, and etc. (If Bush were so guilty, we all are, and
IF you are a US citizen SO ARE YOU !)
If you are a US citizen, your pinning Bush' name to it is a pure case
of a mental problem called DENIAL
You traitoriously disagree with OUR National activities
FACE IT
Your idol Bush is a mere criminal, not equivalent in any way
to the entire country he happens to be abusing so terribly.
That's what his invasion and slaughter of helpless innocents
was intended to do.
Terrorist [sic] are they ...
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims, hi-jake
commercial modes of transportation, delibrately bomb places where
civilians gather, or use their own suicides in order to kill as many
civilians as possible; The idea being to sway the civilian population
to push for the terrorist desires in hopes of ending the terror caused
by the terrorist (although I can't see any signs that civilians have
ever been influenced in the way intended)
Legitament military action attempts to minimize civilian casualties as
much as possible while attacking military targets, and killing the
enemy(military), and taking prisoners, until the military goals are
gained
Your poorly-wrought mindless drivel doesn't become
anything of any merit for you merely blathering it over
and over. Notice what the Bible says about that?
We aren't talking Bible, but be very careful, the Bible contains the
OLD TESTAMENT (ever read how it says to handle enemies ?)
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims
You weren't aware of the way that's been done to Iraqis?
The US / UK troops did not do as you wish to claim.
You merely don't know. You're ignorant of far too much.
My grandson was there, he is presently home on leave, and is expected
to go back, I had been receiving first-hand reports from him.
I have also served in combat, and know what happens to the "best laid"
plans (SNFUS happen)
You are the one who is ignorant of everything but anti-US propaganda
Perhaps you should consider actually reading the news.
Maybe you should stick to OUR news
Why do you want to swallow mere propaganda?
Why do you want to swallow mere propaganda ? ALL NEWS is PROPAGANDA
Are you too frightened to think?
I see no reason to make things up, in my mind ("think")
Legitament [sic] military action
That'd require a legitimate CIC, and you don't have one.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
Yea
<snip>
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: Please, Tell Me Why You Love Bush and Satan and Hate Jesus |
04 Jul 2003 12:02:52 PM |
|
|
The wind-bag over answered, again.
Look for the same header preceeded by "a" "b", and or etc. to be
answered later
On Thu, 03 Jul 2003 10:00:02 -0400, Kneel before Satan and Bush!
wrote:
Dipstick wrote:
Kneel before Satan and Bush! wrote:
Dipstick wrote:
Second try, something knocked me off-line
There's no reason for you to be unable to
compose emails offline.
When the computer ceases to function, no "emails" (posts to
newsgroups) can be composed until the computer is once more up and
running.
So quit breaking your computer and run it properly,
don't expect others to endure your garbage because
you can't manage to be responsible for yourself.
Learn how, so you
can quit whining about your own failures in
lieu of making valid points.
...I don't even own a gun...
That doesn't matter when you hire killers to
put contracts on innocents.
Please prove that I have hired these killers
You're giving that murderous crook Bush your
go-ahead to slaughter innocents in your name.
Survivors/victims of 9/11 haven't done so, so
why do you believe you should?
, and explain how I paid
them
You've paid by giving up your decency, your
dignity, and your rights as a US citizen, and
in return you've merely been robbed and
held up as a vicious sinner to the world.
... No, he
ordered others to do it. ...
So if someone puts out a contract on you,
they haven't done you any harm, to you?
Personally ? No !
So you don't feel that someone hiring a killer to take
you out would be a problem for you.
Again, you merely exemplify incapacity to reason.
... Americans attacked Iraq ...
Bush deceived many, to invade and terrorize
Iraq so his oil-baron pals could cash in on their
ongoing, inhumane corruption.
OPINIONS are just that OPINIONS
So why have you your false opinions but no facts?
Do you believe in a God who only lies to you?
Possibly some mis-information
Whatever would you mean by 'possibly'?
It was *definitely* misinformation.
SOME of it, but not all of it, most already accepted around the world.
Why would anyone imagine that?
Oh, that's right, you're mentally incompetent.
Or don't you have any ethics via which to discern?
Corrector:
So if you order a contract hit on somebody's toddler,
and you pay someone to go kill the little kiddie, then
the payee who wouldn't do so otherwise kills a child
due solely to your offer of money for it, would it mean
you were innocent entirely of the crime, in your opinion,
if you merely sat back elsewhere as it were committed?
Saddam and his government were not innocent little kiddies
As far as any threat to you, they were.
Terrorism...
That's Bush attacking innocents based on his lies and desire
to steal what is theirs.
Does your religion tell you to covet, and murder for it?
You exemplify hypocrisy in not going after, say, Mugabe.
WE can't be everywhere at once.
Christians were free to worship in Iraq before, but not now.
Have you no priorities at all?
I may not agree with my government's
priorities, but at least we are doing SOMETHING
That's no excuse for wrongdoing at all.
If some human bothers you, and you run over your cat,
that doesn't make it right because you did 'something'.
Dipstick:
Our troops were, and they were NOT involved in
"terrorizing" anyone,
Corrector:
So you figure the Iraqi victims weren't afraid?
Whether or not *fear* was involved has NOTHING to do with it
You are mistaken.
Terrorist are ...
Bush terrorized the people of Iraq by bombing them
when they were innocent of any wrongdoing, just so
his corrupt cronies could steal from them.
It's Bush's fascism, terrorism, and war crimes, and when
you support him in them you advertise your love for Satan.
Bush terrorized those people to steal their oil from them.
... "Bush" = USA...
You are mistaken.
Your idol Bush is a mere criminal, not equivalent in any way
to the entire country he happens to be abusing so terribly.
That's what his invasion and slaughter of helpless innocents
was intended to do.
Terrorist [sic] are they ...
Your poorly-wrought mindless drivel doesn't become
anything of any merit for you merely blathering it over
and over. Notice what the Bible says about that?
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims
You weren't aware of the way that's been done to Iraqis?
The US / UK troops did not do as you wish to claim.
You merely don't know. You're ignorant of far too much.
Perhaps you should consider actually reading the news.
Maybe you should stick to OUR news
Why do you want to swallow mere propaganda?
Are you too frightened to think?
Legitament [sic] military action
That'd require a legitimate CIC, and you don't have one.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
All you have is a deserter criminal usurper who lies to you.
attempts to minimize civilian casualties as
You figure cluster bombs to Baghdad would qualify? Why?
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
...the enemy ...
You merely fell for Bush's conspiracy theories.
The Iraqis weren't your enemies before, although they have
every right to be your enemies now, since you attacked them
for no good reason.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
Even legitament [sic] military action ...
Legitimate military actions aren't those based on lies.
And they weren't
You believe Saddam had nukes, or helped with 9/11?
Wow, are you stupid.
That leaves the Bush invasion of Iraq out.
Never took place.
Ask an Iraqi, or don't you consider them to be human?
You sure do hate Jesus.
Corrector:
Do you have any working definition of 'terrorism',
Yes,
Prove it.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
That's not a definition, that's merely your diarrhea.
Corrector:
and, if so, any means of excluding Bush's attacks
on Iraq and Afghanistan from it?
Terrorist are they who delibrately kill innocent victims
Those killed in Iraq were killed deliberately, yet they were
totally innocent of any crime whatsoever against the USA.
Irrelivant, [sic]
Only to you hate-filled racist murderers and criminals ...
the War On Terrorism is just
It's Bush's lies, and you have no excuse for believing them.
THAT a war
There has been no war declared.
against they who
aid terrorist, support terrorists, train, encourage, and / or etc.
There's no evidence that they supported anyone who posed
any threat to you or any other person in the USA at all.
Why are you so stupid?
Are you brain damaged? Have you no moral support system?
There is NO requirement that such terrorism be directed at the USA
So you want to start bombing Ireland because the IRA might
attack the Brits?
Wow are you stupid.
Corrector:
Do you believe that you should retaliate against
people who weren't even involved, when you
perceive that you are under attack? Why?
We aren't in a "War Against THE Terrorists of 9-11"
You want to make sure Bush gets away with it, don't you.
I want to see terrorism put in its place !
Bush is putting terrorism into its place as his big cash cow.
You're getting gored by his bull, too. That's okay if you're
into getting hurt, but not okay for you to wish that on others.
, our war is called
"The War On TERRORISM" such INCLUDES anti-Israel terrorists, such as
Saddam supported.
Why are you pretending you'd be protecting Israelis, when
you merely wish to exploit them?
I am a Jew, maybe you might want to reword your accusation.
Why are you pretending you'd be protecting Israelis, when
you merely wish to exploit them?
Your war is a sham, a lie, a disgrace, a slap to Jesus' face.
We are all free to our OPINIONS
So why are you into a slap to Jesus' face?
Is that what you love about it so much, servant of Satan?
Nice dudge
There's nothing nice about you, you're a hatemonger.
You're an insult to God.
Because being Americans, we believe US reporters (US News =propganda)
Yet US reporters have reported falsehoods.
Yet anti-US reporters have reported falsehoods (truth is often
realitive; it depends on which side you are on, personally I fly the
Red, White, and Blue)
You use the flag as a diaper, it's obvious you're no patriot.
Letting liar crooks like Bush ruin your country makes you a traitor.
Why aren't you able to question the questionable?
I support my own People
Bush hurts your own people, you don't support them
unless you resist Bush.
, and trust them to do what is right for OUR
Honor
You have no honor, you are treasonous scum, for
your worship of that murdering crook Bush.
Besides, the reports of deliberate targetting of civilians are in.
Terrorist [sic] are
[yadda yadda yadda ... Dip's ***** deleted ...]
Hadn't you noticed that, either?
The anti-US press may have made such claims, I do not buy their
propaganda.
The facts are in, you're merely too frightened to notice them.
Why have you no source of true courage at all whatsoever?
<snippage>
You're such a coward, as all Satan's minions have to be.
Corrector:
Do you not realize the extent of the use of such munitions
in entirely civilian areas of Baghdad, for but one example?
| |
