"Pastor Dave" <_-_Ananias917_-_@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0adu5259q0qdhltk0s43fk1ldnvbi50go6@4ax.com...
On Sun, 07 May 2006 15:16:48 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
<lojbab@lojban.org> spake thusly:
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" <kands00@hotmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
I think the locusts with the face of a man was
a distinction. Seems to me, if someone can't
catch on at that point, they have more problems
than they're sharing here. :)
Why would it be separated and treated differently
in the book, if it all were to be considered the same?
By that logic we are free to make a unique interpretation of any
scripture that we can see as being separate or treated differently
from some other part of scripture, with us getting to decide what
constitutes separate or different.
He obviously thinks that Revelation was something
given by God, to 21st century Gentiles and that it
has nothing to do with the rest of the Bible. (:
Dave the book is *prophecy* written in 90 AD.
<snip>
Actually, yes, there is. But I won't argue this
point., as I don't consider it something worth
arguing about. I will say that this person is
reaching down to a point of utter despair at
the inability to dispute what was said, as he
always does.
--
"Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass,
till all these things be fulfilled." - Matthew 24:34
"Prevent truth decay. Brush up on your Bible."
.
