"Bible John" <john.doggett@x-files.gov>
Re: Resolved. The King James version is not God's only Bible for the English speaking people
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=180534
Join iidb.org to challenge me.
I purpose a challenge to a KJVO Fundamentalist Christian the following
topic.
[B]Resolved. The King James version is not God's only Bible for the English
speaking people[/B]
I will argue in favor and my opponent will oppose. I'd like a 2 week time
frame in between statements, and a concurrent form of 4-5 rounds.
I will arguing these and many other points in my rebuttal of the KJVO view.
1. How did people get saved before 1611?
2. Can you explain why the KJV includes the word "Corn" when "Corn" was not
in Egypt at the time of the Bible?
3. Can you explain why the KJV says that "God Repented from evil"?
4. Can you explain Ex 20:13 where the KJV forbids killing an insect? Yet the
NKJV and all modern translations do not?
5. Can you explain what "Gay clothing is?"
6. Can you tell me what a Unicorn looks like?
7. Is/was the Latin Vulgate the "word of God"? Why or why not? (Note: the
Latin Vulgate was the standard Bible, by which all else was compared, more
universally and for a longer period of time than the KJV has been)
8. Is/was the Septuagint (LXX) the "word of God"? Why or why not? (Note:
despite its obvious imperfections and inclusion of apocryphal books, the KJV
translators still called it "the word of God".
9. Is/was the Geneva Bible, the Great Bible, Matthew's, Tyndale's, etc. the
"word of God"? Why or why not?
10. If scripture is the sole authority for matters of faith and doctrine,
then by what authority should anyone accept the doctrine of KJV-onlyism?
Since scripture does not teach the doctrine of KJV-onlyism, is it not then
an extra-Biblical doctrine? Why should we accept a doctrine needing a second
authority, proclaimed by those who argue that there is only one authority
for matters of doctrine in the first place?
----
Please note that I am not attacking the KJV Translation, for its a very good
work. I have myself 1 Print KJV Bible and a KJV Bible on all my computers.
he KJV is a good work. But its not the most reliable translation, nor is it
the only translation.
--
Vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger in the 2006 election!
http://www.joinarnold.com
The Bible calls sinners to Repentance (LK 5:32) and God's people to Holiness
(Rom 12:2).
www.cerm.info
Church Education Resource Ministries Founder and Director
Hello,
Yes, anyone can translate a Bible into their language, and word it
anyway they want. The key test to a translation is its adherence to
the oldest and best Bible documents and its use of those Greek, and
Hebrew words etc.
Yes, the KJV has its problems but so do many modern Bibles. For
example, many (if not most) modern Bibles start off with over 6000
translation errors when they removed God's name, and put in the
incorrect words of "Lord" (or "God") in its place. The word "Lord" is
a title, not a name. And by doing so, they even make out God to be a
liar! For example Isa 42:8,
"I am the LORD; that is my name! I will not give my glory to another
or my praise to idols." ( NIV)
But there is a modern Bible which translates God's name when it is
found in the source Bible documents. That Bible is the New World
Translation. This Bible does not make God to be a liar, but translates
the diving name into English with the well-known and established
English translation of "Jehovah". (some prefer "Yahweh"). Isa 42:8,
"I am Jehovah. That is my name; and to no one else shall I give my own
glory, neither my praise to graven images." (NWT)
Sincerely, James
***********************************
Want a FREE home Bible study?
Have Jehovah's Witnesses questions?
Go to the authorized source:
http://www.watchtower.org
***********************************
<snip>
...
++ Christnet NewsPortal Website Address +++
http://www.kwem.com/newsportal/index.html
Christnet Bulletin Board Forum is now online
located at http://www.kwem.com/forum/index.php
.
|