| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"sheep defender" |
| Date: |
07 Sep 2004 08:16:40 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Science and Religion |
In article <9_mdnTowouF8LqbcRVn-hw@comcast.com>, Art D'Adamo wrote:
Science and Religion
If you're interested in science and in religion, and wish
the two were more in agreement, you're invited to a free
download of the book "Science Without Bounds:
A Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Mysticism"
When the expert religionists of ancient Egypt made up their religion the
result was multifaceted and clever, with many levels of meaning. For
them, science was everyday observation.
A thousand years later, when the herding tribesmen made up their religion
it naturally addressed their concerns, patriarchal moral structures,
uppity wives and daughters, health dangers from food and conditions, and
of course, who deserved killin'.. Science was in its dark and
superstitious infancy.
When the guilt-ridden men of the first century made up their religion they
included OODLES of psychology, but reliable natural sciences were the last
thing they wanted..
I think scientists should conjure up a religion for us today. It
certainly couldn't be any worse than our ignorance-derived presently
surviving orthodoxies.
Defender
.
|
|
| User: "supertech" |
|
| Title: Re: Science and Religion |
09 Sep 2004 12:52:29 AM |
|
|
Science can not explain some of the phenomena happening in the universe at
this point.
All of the abnormal spiritual phenomena can not be explained by science
either.
Science can not direct and conjure up a religion. How can you explain
eternal love and creation?
Instead, I guess one can eliminate unscientific doctrine from the existing
religious teachings.
"sheep defender" <sdsdsdsdsd@waithingforthelight.com> wrote in message
news:sdsdsdsdsd-0709041916410001@ras02-216-31-90-180.lru-dial.zianet.com...
In article <9_mdnTowouF8LqbcRVn-hw@comcast.com>, Art D'Adamo wrote:
Science and Religion
If you're interested in science and in religion, and wish
the two were more in agreement, you're invited to a free
download of the book "Science Without Bounds:
A Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Mysticism"
When the expert religionists of ancient Egypt made up their religion the
result was multifaceted and clever, with many levels of meaning. For
them, science was everyday observation.
A thousand years later, when the herding tribesmen made up their religion
it naturally addressed their concerns, patriarchal moral structures,
uppity wives and daughters, health dangers from food and conditions, and
of course, who deserved killin'.. Science was in its dark and
superstitious infancy.
When the guilt-ridden men of the first century made up their religion they
included OODLES of psychology, but reliable natural sciences were the last
thing they wanted..
I think scientists should conjure up a religion for us today. It
certainly couldn't be any worse than our ignorance-derived presently
surviving orthodoxies.
Defender
.
|
|
|
| User: "sheep defender" |
|
| Title: Re: Science and Religion |
10 Sep 2004 10:21:25 AM |
|
|
In article <xcS%c.3645$ug2.358@fe2.texas.rr.com>, "supertech"
<ejone5@austin.rr.com> wrote:
Science can not explain some of the phenomena happening in the universe at
this point.
Well, you'll need to name one.
All of the abnormal spiritual phenomena can not be explained by science
either.
Maybe they're all figments of pre-conditioned imaginations.
Science can not direct and conjure up a religion. How can you explain
eternal love and creation?
Eternal love and creation are evident and science has been explaining them
more and more accurately as the centuries pass. Eternal love is reflected
in the very improbability of our emergence. Why is there eternal love and
creation? Because we wouldn't be here without it.
Science might determine someday that the multiverse never had a
beginning. This would answer most deep questions.
Instead, I guess one can eliminate unscientific doctrine from the existing
religious teachings.
Yes, unscientific doctrines should be eliminated wherever they're found.
"sheep defender" <sdsdsdsdsd@waithingforthelight.com> wrote in message
news:sdsdsdsdsd-0709041916410001@ras02-216-31-90-180.lru-dial.zianet.com...
In article <9_mdnTowouF8LqbcRVn-hw@comcast.com>, Art D'Adamo wrote:
Science and Religion
If you're interested in science and in religion, and wish
the two were more in agreement, you're invited to a free
download of the book "Science Without Bounds:
A Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Mysticism"
When the expert religionists of ancient Egypt made up their religion the
result was multifaceted and clever, with many levels of meaning. For
them, science was everyday observation.
A thousand years later, when the herding tribesmen made up their religion
it naturally addressed their concerns, patriarchal moral structures,
uppity wives and daughters, health dangers from food and conditions, and
of course, who deserved killin'.. Science was in its dark and
superstitious infancy.
When the guilt-ridden men of the first century made up their religion they
included OODLES of psychology, but reliable natural sciences were the last
thing they wanted..
I think scientists should conjure up a religion for us today. It
certainly couldn't be any worse than our ignorance-derived presently
surviving orthodoxies.
Defender
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
