The High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper, pp 99-103

A FINAL WORD...

Who will be ruling America . . .
when America is ruling the New World Order?

An examination of "the secret agenda behind the agenda"
of the High Priests of War.

The United Nations - as we have known it - can effectively be
considered a ghost of the past. The UN has been shelved, sidelined,
consigned to the trash heap - at least temporarily - by the one world
dreamers who once saw the global body as the means of establishing a
world hegemony. Today's imperialists now envision Uncle Sam as their
officially-designated world policeman or, in their more academic terms
"the center of a new international system."137 The goal is "a world
that looks like America, and is therefore safe for all."

However, despite the rhetoric - which might please the ears of many
grass-roots American patriots (or those who fancy themselves that) -
it's not quite so simple. There's more to this agenda than meets the
eye.

What might be described as The Grand Scheme for a New World Order - in
the wake of America's new "imperial" role - was imparted in quite
candid fashion in a major two-part policy paper in the Summer 2003 and
Winter 2004 issues of The Journal of International Security Affairs,
house organ of the definitively influential Jewish Institute for
National Security Policy (JINSA), which has been referenced repeatedly
in the pages of The High Priests of War.

Once a previously little-known Washington think tank, JINSA is now
often publicly acknowledged as perhaps the most specific guiding force
behind Bush administration foreign policy today. So when something
appears in a JINSA publication, there's a lot of weight behind it.

The author, Alexander H. Joffe, a pro-Israel academic, has been a
featured writer in the pages of this JINSA publication, and that he
was given so much space to tout his theories certainly reflects the
high regard in which his views are held.

Joffe's two-part series was entitled "The Empire That Dared Not Speak
Its Name." In his essay, Joffe frankly admitted that "America is an
empire" and asserts that, yes, this is a very good thing.

Joffe says that when the UN dared to take on Zionism, that marked the
demise of the UN in the minds of the internationalists. Joffe writes:
"The end of the General Assembly as a credible body may plausibly be
ascribed to the infamous 'Zionism is Racism' resolution in 1975." The
JINSA author contends that the world should be "grateful" that the UN
has been "discredited, reduced to farce and ultimately ground to a
halt," referring, of course, to UN positions that the Zionists and
their allies in the world empire movement find offensive.

As a result of the UN being shelved as a world government vehicle,
writes Joffe, "We now have the opportunity, and obligation, to begin
again." However, he warns that the emerging European Union (EU) is a
threat to the dream of a global empire.

The JINSA writer asserts that the EU is an "alternative vision for the
international community," one that, as he puts it, frankly is "the
authentic countervision to an American Empire." According to the
Zionist writer, the biggest problem with Europe and the EU is that
"culture remains at the core of Europe's problems. Nationalism was a
doctrine born in Europe, as were its vicious mutant offspring: fascism
and communism."

(Note: A fervent advocate of Israeli super-nationalism, the writer,
Joffe, doesn't seem to see the lack of logic in his attack on other
peoples' nationalism - but then, again, honesty has never been
integral to the hardline Zionist point of view.)

Joffe complains that although "the new European Empire is
multi-cultural in theory . . . in reality it is dominated politically
and culturally by France and economically by Germany." Today, in the
EU, he says, "driven by a sense of postcolonial guilt and postwar
ennui the doors have been thrown open to all ideas. At the most
sinister levels it has permitted and even legitimized a vast explosion
of unhinged thought and action, namely anti-Americanism,
anti-Semitism, and a wide variety of conspiracy theories."

(The so-called "conspiracy theories" that so alarm this Zionist
theoretician are those that dare to challenge the "official" views of
what really happened on September 11, 2001. He is inflamed that
millions of people in Europe and the Muslim world - not to mention the
United States have raised questions about Israeli foreknowledge and/or
involvement in those events.)

In any case, what Joffe describes as "the other kind of liberal
internationalism" is what the Zionist movement favors and Joffe
defines it:

"The American Empire has no real or theoretical competitors. The
goal of the American Empire in the 21st century is not territorial
control or the exploitation of resources but political and economic
leadership which defends and advances American interests, and which
promotes the development and well being of all nations. Given our
history and our values, that future lies in leveraging the American
Empire in such a way that it becomes the basis of a new democratic
international system.
"Ultimately the only answer for a stable and prosperous planet
will be a global system that is structurally and morally similar to
the American union - semi-autonomous states with secular, liberal
democratic systems; where states have both prescribed rights and
agreed upon responsibilities in a larger secular, liberal democratic
framework; one equipped with checks and balances and meaningful
institutions; with governance based on rule of law and tolerant and
pluralist values."

In the second part of his extended essay, published in the Winter 2004
issue of JINSA's journal, Joffe pursued this line of thought further,
expanding on his call for what he described as "an empire that looks
like America." 138

Amazingly, Joffe frankly talks about the United States engaging in
massive imperial conquests in the trouble-torn regions of
Africa-presumably after the United States has already made havoc in
the Arab countries of the Middle East:

"The conditions under which America and its allies would simply
take over and restore African countries are far from clear. What are
the thresholds for intervention? What are the procedures and
outcomes? Who will fight and who will pay? The restoration of Africa
would involve long-term commitments and immense costs, of the sort
that could only be paid for by Africa itself. That is to say, it would
probably require American economic control, to go along with political
and cultural control. Colonialism is always pay as you go, and it is
not pretty. The question is both whether Africa can pay the price (or
afford not to) and whether America has the stomach."

Of course, Africa is not the only target of Joffe and his like-minded
schemers (and that is precisely what they are, however, "extreme" that
term may be perceived). In fact, Joffe talks of a wide-ranging global
agenda - well beyond the African continent.

In the end, however, Joffe lets the cat out of the bag, about the real
intentions of those who are using United States military power as the
mechanism for a bigger agenda. "New arrangements," he says, "must come
into being under American leadership to provide an alternative for
states that are willing to accept rights and responsibilities." Joffe
dreams of a United Nations that has been re-made under the imperial
force of the United States. And ultimately, he predicts the
possibility of a world government, writing:

"Possibly, after a period of chaos and anger, which in any event
would simply intensify existing states of being, the institution [the
United Nations] might be bludgeoned into changing. [Note his use of
the term 'bludgeoned.'-MCP]
"Rather than a club that admits all, the 21st century United
Nations might - someday, somehow - be remade into an exclusive, by
invitation, members-only group, of free, democratic states, sharing
similar values. Or in the end, replaced by one. That day, however, may
be decades off."

Should there be any doubt that he is talking about world government,
note Joffe's concluding words:

"The best way to preserve the American empire is to eventually
give it up. Setting the stage for global governance can only be done
with American leadership and American-led institutions of the sort
schematically outlined here."

So it is. Despite all the high-sounding rhetoric about "democracy,"
what it all comes down to - in the words of this pro-Israel ideologue
- is the use of America's military power to advance another (secret)
agenda altogether. Even many of those grass-roots American flag-wavers
(who may be genuine patriots) who relish the concept of an American
empire may find Joffe's concepts somewhat different from what they
otherwise might perceive.

But here, in the pages of a devotedly pro-Zionist journal, we learn
precisely what the "story behind the story" actually happens to be. It
has nothing to do, really, even with a "strong America" or, for that
matter, even with America itself.

The United States of America is simply a pawn - albeit a powerful
one-in the game, being ruthlessly shifted about in a scheme for world
dominance by an elite few operating behind the scenes.

And, in the end, this does tell us very much about who The High
Priests of War really are and what their agenda is really all about.
There's no mystery at all.

What remains to be determined is what the American people - and all
other real patriots in nations around the globe - intend to do about
it.

The question is this: will the world finally decide it is time to
declare war on The High Priests of War?
-- MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER