| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Gactimus" |
| Date: |
22 Nov 2004 06:18:50 PM |
| Object: |
Re: The Roe v Wade effect on future elections |
(Chris the Liberal) wrote in
news:b5d75753.0411221613.48fcb52c@posting.google.com:
"Liberals_HATE,America!-_" <JEB-2008@bush08.org> wrote in message
news:<4671fe9b592de1def6d680851a547091@news.meganetnews.com>...
"Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
In the 41 areas for which race was adequately reported, approximately
55% of women who obtained legal induced abortions were known to be
white, 35% were black, and 7% were of other races; for 3% of the
women, race was unknown. The abortion ratio for black women (503 per
1,000 live births) was 3.0 times the ratio for white women (167 per
1,000 live births).
This is exactly why white liberals are so militantly pro-abortion. They
know that if not for abortion blacks would be 25% of the population.
Instead their number have been stalled at 12-13% for the past 40 years.
Take your HATE and your ***** and Shove IT.
We are NOT PRO-abortion. We are PRO-choice.
I don't know any liberal who FAVORS abortion; we simply believe
that the woman should be free to choose. It's you concservatives
who want to keep women barefooted, pregnant and submissive.
Incidentally, see the 5 "legal gun-owners" in Michigan who
killed each other over a trivial matter?????????????
THAT is HATE.
"Pro-choice" is a euphemism for pro-abortion. If the issue were slavery,
"pro-choice" would be a euphemism for pro-slavery.
If abortion is not evil, why do so many of its advocates reject the
objective term pro-abortion?
.
|
|
| User: "Eric Chomko" |
|
| Title: Re: The Roe v Wade effect on future elections |
23 Nov 2004 11:30:50 AM |
|
|
Gactimus (gactimus@xrs.net) wrote:
: (Chris the Liberal) wrote in
: news:b5d75753.0411221613.48fcb52c@posting.google.com:
: > "Liberals_HATE,America!-_" <JEB-2008@bush08.org> wrote in message
: > news:<4671fe9b592de1def6d680851a547091@news.meganetnews.com>...
: >
: >> "Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
: >>
: >>> In the 41 areas for which race was adequately reported, approximately
: >>> 55% of women who obtained legal induced abortions were known to be
: >>> white, 35% were black, and 7% were of other races; for 3% of the
: >>> women, race was unknown. The abortion ratio for black women (503 per
: >>> 1,000 live births) was 3.0 times the ratio for white women (167 per
: >>> 1,000 live births).
: >>
: >> This is exactly why white liberals are so militantly pro-abortion. They
: >> know that if not for abortion blacks would be 25% of the population.
: >> Instead their number have been stalled at 12-13% for the past 40 years.
: > Take your HATE and your ***** and Shove IT.
: >
: > We are NOT PRO-abortion. We are PRO-choice.
: > I don't know any liberal who FAVORS abortion; we simply believe
: > that the woman should be free to choose. It's you concservatives
: > who want to keep women barefooted, pregnant and submissive.
: >
: > Incidentally, see the 5 "legal gun-owners" in Michigan who
: > killed each other over a trivial matter?????????????
: > THAT is HATE.
: "Pro-choice" is a euphemism for pro-abortion. If the issue were slavery,
: "pro-choice" would be a euphemism for pro-slavery.
: If abortion is not evil, why do so many of its advocates reject the
: objective term pro-abortion?
Because the hypocrite conservatives that have abortions find it easier
that way.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Roe v Wade effect on future elections |
22 Nov 2004 09:39:00 PM |
|
|
In our last episode <1101169130.pHL1fTvHNDfKyGQI6zd+sw@bubbanews>,
Gactimus lept out of the bushes shouting:
Cognitus44@hotmail.com (Chris the Liberal) wrote in
news:b5d75753.0411221613.48fcb52c@posting.google.com:
"Liberals_HATE,America!-_" <JEB-2008@bush08.org> wrote in message
news:<4671fe9b592de1def6d680851a547091@news.meganetnews.com>...
"Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
In the 41 areas for which race was adequately reported, approximately
55% of women who obtained legal induced abortions were known to be
white, 35% were black, and 7% were of other races; for 3% of the
women, race was unknown. The abortion ratio for black women (503 per
1,000 live births) was 3.0 times the ratio for white women (167 per
1,000 live births).
This is exactly why white liberals are so militantly pro-abortion. They
know that if not for abortion blacks would be 25% of the population.
Instead their number have been stalled at 12-13% for the past 40 years.
Take your HATE and your ***** and Shove IT.
We are NOT PRO-abortion. We are PRO-choice. I don't know any liberal
who FAVORS abortion; we simply believe
that the woman should be free to choose. It's you concservatives who
want to keep women barefooted, pregnant and submissive.
Incidentally, see the 5 "legal gun-owners" in Michigan who
killed each other over a trivial matter????????????? THAT is HATE.
"Pro-choice" is a euphemism for pro-abortion. If the issue were slavery,
"pro-choice" would be a euphemism for pro-slavery.
If abortion is not evil, why do so many of its advocates reject the
objective term pro-abortion?
Because they believe the woman should have a *choice. They're not saying
she *should have an abortion. Only that she should have the *choice. Which
makes them pro-CHOICE get it?
(They're just not getting any smarter)
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe
is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being
surprised at how well it fits its hole"
-- Douglas Adams
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
