Religions > Bible > Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
| Date: |
27 Apr 2004 03:03:39 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
Sounds to me like you were once involved in it (?)
"John W" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:biosnv47pbuv8fqo8t3fnvrpttl6nhjacg@4ax.com...
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 00:05:08 GMT, "Back by popular demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0410031000370001@ppp158.dyn27.pacific.net.au...
In article <tLkfb.9807$ui6.8833@news01.roc.ny>, "Back by popular
demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0310031534180001@ppp89.dyn12.pacific.net.au...
In article <11spnvg0pfjlknna0qkmc3a4cf8395g60l@4ax.com>, John W
<john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote:
In fact, TM IS a religion. The religion behind TM is Hinduism.
Those
who have revealed their mantras to the investigators have
determined
that the Hindu mantra is in fact the name of a Hindu deity.
John W
Again you are talking nonsense. The mantra is a group of sounds or
words
that may or may not refer to a Deity
Phar with all due respect, the mantras used in TM are.
I was referring to the word mantra itself. My understanding is that
there
are thousands of mantras that are used and I have no doubt many refer
to
Gods. However to attack TM on the basis of chanting mantras is rather
idiotic in my opinion
It seems to me that making an uneducated reply is not the wisest thing to
do.
Like I say it is simply not for me - although I otherwise very much
enjoy
aspects of Indian Culture.
That is fine for you, but there are others, that take great offence at
not
being told wthat their Hindu deity mantra truly are.
<snip>
Good point. And I am amazed that I overlooked it. The initiate is NOT
told that he is chanting the name of a Hindu deity. And TM
practitioners are also lied to when they aren't told they're being
initiated into Hinduism. They are also lied to when they are told each
TM initiate receives a "totally unique" word that "no one else has."
Untrue. There are MANY more TM practitioners than there are Hindu
deities' names.
Why all the dishonesty right from the start when TM is so POSITIVE?
I smell a "pile" in the woodpile.
John W
____________________________________________________________________________
___
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source
<><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
| User: "Shma-Yisrael" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
28 Apr 2004 01:14:14 PM |
|
|
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message news:<108tf4ndrbradf4@corp.supernews.com>...
Glen Wrote:
========================================================================
Some of us (Christians) believe in the original God of Genesis one,
that
being the Elohim (all the Gods {big "G" meaning good}united as one);
which
means that we can't declare all 'pagan gods' as demons, because some
may
well be part of The Elohim, unknown to us.
============================================================================
I responded:
=============================================================================
You are forgetting, "Elohinu YHWH Ehaad" or "Our God YHWH (is) one."
(Devarim aka Deuteronomy 6:4) This is a direct reflection on the
commandment "You will have no other Gods before me". If you lift up a
pagan god, you have broken this commandment. Your comment can not be
understood as relating to the concept of "Deus Absconditus" (hidden or
unknown God). That is poor exegesis.
=============================================================================
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
01 May 2004 09:13:21 PM |
|
|
My sect calls this Yahweh Elohim the Demiurge, ever hear of the term ?
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0404281014.1b4480ef@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:<108tf4ndrbradf4@corp.supernews.com>...
Glen Wrote:
========================================================================
Some of us (Christians) believe in the original God of Genesis one,
that
being the Elohim (all the Gods {big "G" meaning good}united as one);
which
means that we can't declare all 'pagan gods' as demons, because some
may
well be part of The Elohim, unknown to us.
============================================================================
I responded:
============================================================================
=
You are forgetting, "Elohinu YHWH Ehaad" or "Our God YHWH (is) one."
(Devarim aka Deuteronomy 6:4) This is a direct reflection on the
commandment "You will have no other Gods before me". If you lift up a
pagan god, you have broken this commandment. Your comment can not be
understood as relating to the concept of "Deus Absconditus" (hidden or
unknown God). That is poor exegesis.
============================================================================
=
.
|
|
|
| User: "Shma-Yisrael" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
02 May 2004 10:29:19 AM |
|
|
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message news:<1098ma1k90k5f96@corp.supernews.com>...
My sect calls this Yahweh Elohim the Demiurge, ever hear of the term ?
Yes. The word means literally a public worker, demioergós, demiourgós,
and was originally used to designate any craftsman plying his craft or
trade for the use of the public. Soon, however, technítes and other
words began to be used to designate the common artisan while demiurge
was set aside for the Great Artificer or Fabricator, the Architect of
the universe. This is associated with gnosticism. Are you a gnostic?
SHALOM!
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0404281014.1b4480ef@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:<108tf4ndrbradf4@corp.supernews.com>...
Glen Wrote:
========================================================================
Some of us (Christians) believe in the original God of Genesis one,
that
being the Elohim (all the Gods {big "G" meaning good}united as one);
which
means that we can't declare all 'pagan gods' as demons, because some
may
well be part of The Elohim, unknown to us.
============================================================================
I responded:
============================================================================
=
You are forgetting, "Elohinu YHWH Ehaad" or "Our God YHWH (is) one."
(Devarim aka Deuteronomy 6:4) This is a direct reflection on the
commandment "You will have no other Gods before me". If you lift up a
pagan god, you have broken this commandment. Your comment can not be
understood as relating to the concept of "Deus Absconditus" (hidden or
unknown God). That is poor exegesis.
============================================================================
=
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
04 May 2004 12:16:01 AM |
|
|
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405020729.7d1d7adb@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:<1098ma1k90k5f96@corp.supernews.com>...
My sect calls this Yahweh Elohim the Demiurge, ever hear of the term ?
Yes. The word means literally a public worker, demioergós, demiourgós,
and was originally used to designate any craftsman plying his craft or
trade for the use of the public. Soon, however, technítes and other
words began to be used to designate the common artisan while demiurge
was set aside for the Great Artificer or Fabricator, the Architect of
the universe. This is associated with gnosticism. Are you a gnostic?
The Gnostics of Alt.religion.gnostic don't seem to think so, I am a member
of a "dead" Christian sect called Ebionites
SHALOM!
The same to you
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0404281014.1b4480ef@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in
message
news:<108tf4ndrbradf4@corp.supernews.com>...
Glen Wrote:
========================================================================
Some of us (Christians) believe in the original God of Genesis one,
that
being the Elohim (all the Gods {big "G" meaning good}united as one);
which
means that we can't declare all 'pagan gods' as demons, because some
may
well be part of The Elohim, unknown to us.
============================================================================
I responded:
============================================================================
=
You are forgetting, "Elohinu YHWH Ehaad" or "Our God YHWH (is) one."
(Devarim aka Deuteronomy 6:4) This is a direct reflection on the
commandment "You will have no other Gods before me". If you lift up a
pagan god, you have broken this commandment. Your comment can not be
understood as relating to the concept of "Deus Absconditus" (hidden or
unknown God). That is poor exegesis.
============================================================================
=
.
|
|
|
| User: "Shma-Yisrael" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
04 May 2004 02:18:23 PM |
|
|
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message news:<109e9ob42g62q52@corp.supernews.com>...
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405020729.7d1d7adb@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:<1098ma1k90k5f96@corp.supernews.com>...
My sect calls this Yahweh Elohim the Demiurge, ever hear of the term ?
Yes. The word means literally a public worker, demioergós, demiourgós,
and was originally used to designate any craftsman plying his craft or
trade for the use of the public. Soon, however, technítes and other
words began to be used to designate the common artisan while demiurge
was set aside for the Great Artificer or Fabricator, the Architect of
the universe. This is associated with gnosticism. Are you a gnostic?
The Gnostics of Alt.religion.gnostic don't seem to think so, I am a member
of a "dead" Christian sect called Ebionites
You got me there. I am unfamiliar with Ebionites. I know it has to do
with "poor in spirit" or something like that, but I am not even a
novice at understanding it.
SHALOM!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gomez Addams" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
04 May 2004 03:05:04 PM |
|
|
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405041118.74b8f601@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:<109e9ob42g62q52@corp.supernews.com>...
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405020729.7d1d7adb@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in
message
news:<1098ma1k90k5f96@corp.supernews.com>...
My sect calls this Yahweh Elohim the Demiurge, ever hear of the term
?
Yes. The word means literally a public worker, demioergós, demiourgós,
and was originally used to designate any craftsman plying his craft or
trade for the use of the public. Soon, however, technítes and other
words began to be used to designate the common artisan while demiurge
was set aside for the Great Artificer or Fabricator, the Architect of
the universe. This is associated with gnosticism. Are you a gnostic?
The Gnostics of Alt.religion.gnostic don't seem to think so, I am a
member
of a "dead" Christian sect called Ebionites
You got me there. I am unfamiliar with Ebionites. I know it has to do
with "poor in spirit" or something like that, but I am not even a
novice at understanding it.
SHALOM!
Shooting entirely from the hip; I think they reject all Pauline
writings.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
04 May 2004 11:22:06 PM |
|
|
"Gomez Addams" <A@b.c> wrote in message
news:QHSlc.4883$8S1.906@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405041118.74b8f601@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:<109e9ob42g62q52@corp.supernews.com>...
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405020729.7d1d7adb@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in
message
news:<1098ma1k90k5f96@corp.supernews.com>...
My sect calls this Yahweh Elohim the Demiurge, ever hear of the
term
?
Yes. The word means literally a public worker, demioergós,
demiourgós,
and was originally used to designate any craftsman plying his craft
or
trade for the use of the public. Soon, however, technítes and other
words began to be used to designate the common artisan while
demiurge
was set aside for the Great Artificer or Fabricator, the Architect
of
the universe. This is associated with gnosticism. Are you a gnostic?
The Gnostics of Alt.religion.gnostic don't seem to think so, I am a
member
of a "dead" Christian sect called Ebionites
You got me there. I am unfamiliar with Ebionites. I know it has to do
with "poor in spirit" or something like that, but I am not even a
novice at understanding it.
SHALOM!
Shooting entirely from the hip; I think they reject all Pauline
writings.
You are a fairly good shot, we actually reject all "Pauline doctrins";
Unlike they who don't, we put Paul in context with Jesus, instead of Jesus
in context with Paul
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
05 May 2004 01:09:14 PM |
|
|
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:109gqv6ih8gqncd@corp.supernews.com...
You got me there. I am unfamiliar with Ebionites. I know it has to do
with "poor in spirit" or something like that, but I am not even a
novice at understanding it.
SHALOM!
Shooting entirely from the hip; I think they reject all Pauline
writings.
You are a fairly good shot, we actually reject all "Pauline doctrins";
Unlike they who don't, we put Paul in context with Jesus, instead of Jesus
in context with Paul
Do you mean with "Pauline doctrine" that doctrine that puts the cart before
the horse? Salvation before conversion?
That is not Pauls doctrine, but the doctrine of those that believe in
establishing your doctrine on troubleshooting information only and not on
the entire breath of the Word. Them that want a license for immorality, to
feel Christian while continuing in sin.
Paul did not preach anything different than Jesus preached.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
06 May 2004 11:06:36 PM |
|
|
Exactly
"Pedro" <Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote in message
news:e5amc.3613$ML6.3091@news02.roc.ny...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:109gqv6ih8gqncd@corp.supernews.com...
You got me there. I am unfamiliar with Ebionites. I know it has to
do
with "poor in spirit" or something like that, but I am not even a
novice at understanding it.
SHALOM!
Shooting entirely from the hip; I think they reject all Pauline
writings.
You are a fairly good shot, we actually reject all "Pauline doctrins";
Unlike they who don't, we put Paul in context with Jesus, instead of
Jesus
in context with Paul
Do you mean with "Pauline doctrine" that doctrine that puts the cart
before
the horse? Salvation before conversion?
That is not Pauls doctrine, but the doctrine of those that believe in
establishing your doctrine on troubleshooting information only and not on
the entire breath of the Word. Them that want a license for immorality,
to
feel Christian while continuing in sin.
Paul did not preach anything different than Jesus preached.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "willytex" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
05 May 2004 10:34:46 PM |
|
|
Pedro wrote:
Paul did not preach anything different than Jesus preached.
Pedro - If so, Paul may have been the only Apostle who never read
the New Testament.
"Pedro" <Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote in message news:<e5amc.3613$ML6.3091@news02.roc.ny>...
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:109gqv6ih8gqncd@corp.supernews.com...
You got me there. I am unfamiliar with Ebionites. I know it has to do
with "poor in spirit" or something like that, but I am not even a
novice at understanding it.
SHALOM!
Shooting entirely from the hip; I think they reject all Pauline
writings.
You are a fairly good shot, we actually reject all "Pauline doctrins";
Unlike they who don't, we put Paul in context with Jesus, instead of Jesus
in context with Paul
Do you mean with "Pauline doctrine" that doctrine that puts the cart before
the horse? Salvation before conversion?
That is not Pauls doctrine, but the doctrine of those that believe in
establishing your doctrine on troubleshooting information only and not on
the entire breath of the Word. Them that want a license for immorality, to
feel Christian while continuing in sin.
Paul did not preach anything different than Jesus preached.
Pedro - If so, Paul may have been the only Apostle who never read the New Testament.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gomez Addams" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
04 May 2004 03:05:04 PM |
|
|
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405041118.74b8f601@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:<109e9ob42g62q52@corp.supernews.com>...
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405020729.7d1d7adb@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in
message
news:<1098ma1k90k5f96@corp.supernews.com>...
My sect calls this Yahweh Elohim the Demiurge, ever hear of the term
?
Yes. The word means literally a public worker, demioergós, demiourgós,
and was originally used to designate any craftsman plying his craft or
trade for the use of the public. Soon, however, technítes and other
words began to be used to designate the common artisan while demiurge
was set aside for the Great Artificer or Fabricator, the Architect of
the universe. This is associated with gnosticism. Are you a gnostic?
The Gnostics of Alt.religion.gnostic don't seem to think so, I am a
member
of a "dead" Christian sect called Ebionites
You got me there. I am unfamiliar with Ebionites. I know it has to do
with "poor in spirit" or something like that, but I am not even a
novice at understanding it.
SHALOM!
Shooting entirely from the hip; I think they reject all Pauline
writings.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
04 May 2004 11:26:03 PM |
|
|
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405041118.74b8f601@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:<109e9ob42g62q52@corp.supernews.com>...
"Sh'ma-Yisrael" <no_no_no_splam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a4853db4.0405020729.7d1d7adb@posting.google.com...
"Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in
message
news:<1098ma1k90k5f96@corp.supernews.com>...
My sect calls this Yahweh Elohim the Demiurge, ever hear of the term
?
Yes. The word means literally a public worker, demioergós, demiourgós,
and was originally used to designate any craftsman plying his craft or
trade for the use of the public. Soon, however, technítes and other
words began to be used to designate the common artisan while demiurge
was set aside for the Great Artificer or Fabricator, the Architect of
the universe. This is associated with gnosticism. Are you a gnostic?
The Gnostics of Alt.religion.gnostic don't seem to think so, I am a
member
of a "dead" Christian sect called Ebionites
You got me there. I am unfamiliar with Ebionites. I know it has to do
with "poor in spirit" or something like that, but I am not even a
novice at understanding it.
Comes from the Hebrew word 'ebyown (see 34 in Strong's Concordance); which
can be interpreted as you have done, but it actually merely means 'the poor'
SHALOM!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phosphene_Glow" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
18 May 2004 03:46:12 PM |
|
|
Even if one chants the name of one of the Hindu Gods how is that bad?
Because aren't the Gods also part and parcel of the God?
.
|
|
|
| User: "paleryder" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
18 May 2004 03:51:18 PM |
|
|
"Phosphene_Glow" <phosphene_glow@borgias.net> wrote in message
news:ZDuqc.24544$Md.20344@lakeread05...
Even if one chants the name of one of the Hindu Gods how is that bad?
Because aren't the Gods also part and parcel of the God?
To a Lutheran or Baptist, this is definitely NOT true.
This is definitely cross-posted to several inappropriate
news groups.
.
|
|
|
| User: "LawsonE" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
18 May 2004 10:15:37 PM |
|
|
"paleryder" <larry86@cox.net> wrote in message
news:9Huqc.168503$f_5.38639@lakeread01...
"Phosphene_Glow" <phosphene_glow@borgias.net> wrote in message
news:ZDuqc.24544$Md.20344@lakeread05...
Even if one chants the name of one of the Hindu Gods how is that bad?
Because aren't the Gods also part and parcel of the God?
To a Lutheran or Baptist, this is definitely NOT true.
This is definitely cross-posted to several inappropriate
news groups.
I don't think it is inappropriate because it gets to the heart of whether a
"spiritual" practice can be practiced by people in various religions without
violating their religion.
The basic TM mantras are NOT the names of the gods, but they are used in
hindu ceremonies dedicated to those gods.
Of course, depending on which variety of hinduism you're talking about,
"god" (deva) may not be a good translation. "Devas" are the
anthropomorphisms of the forces of nature according to at least some hindus:
they're not people or even personalities in the usual sense of the word,
although various rituals, done properly, can *compell* them to act on your
behalf. Other hindus take a more personal view and see them as living beings
that you try to placate using the same rituals the same way you would
placate and influence a social superior by flattering them and so on. Others
see the devas as being an internal force that you control within yourself by
using those rituals. Etc.
My own interpretation of TM theory is that the TM mantras have a specific
effect on the nervous system when used during TM, and it is this effect that
brought about the association of "gods" and mantras in Hinduism as a way of
*explaining* the observed effect. Of course, I'm a quasi-atheist/agnostic
raised in the Unitarian Universalist Church, so I don't worry about such
things anyway, save as an intellectual exercise. I'm not even convinced that
the varioius TM mantras have different effects, so it's completely a "what
if" exercise for me.
For other people, its absolutely central to their religious identity that
they don't indulge in anything that might possibly be associated with
another religion. I respect people's views, but find this a tad extreme.
Given that attitude, you can't watch an American Indian raindance because
you're participating merely by being there. Likewise with listening to
Indian sitar music since the musical tradition holds that the gods living
inside you are pleased by the music, or bowing to the school logo in a
karate class since technically you're paying respect to the ancient masters
that created the art using a shinto ritual.
At the ultimate extreme, you would have to refuse to photocopy Tibetan
Buddhist artwork as part of a university class because some Tibetan monks
believe that even photocopying certain religious symbols is an act of
worship and that's all they do all day instead of drawing them by hand.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "jw" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
28 Apr 2004 03:29:18 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:03:39 -0500, "Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)"
<christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote:
john w replied
Sounds to me like you were once involved in it (?)
Correct. I never allowed myself to be "initiated' and given a mantra,
but I chanted "Om" with the rest of them, and I chanted for hours at
home.
And I had MANY friends who were involved as well. (that is, "friends"
I made while dabbling in TM.)
When my pastor, Dr. Fickett, got around to preaching/teaching on the
dangers of TM, I stopped practicing it, and I stopped going to
meetings.
I also saw some SCARY stuff at TM meetings that I won't go into, but I
was satisfied that it was demonic from what I saw before I ever heard
anything negative. The sermons/teaching only served to confirm my
suspicions and uneasiness.
"John W" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:biosnv47pbuv8fqo8t3fnvrpttl6nhjacg@4ax.com...
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 00:05:08 GMT, "Back by popular demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0410031000370001@ppp158.dyn27.pacific.net.au...
In article <tLkfb.9807$ui6.8833@news01.roc.ny>, "Back by popular
demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0310031534180001@ppp89.dyn12.pacific.net.au...
In article <11spnvg0pfjlknna0qkmc3a4cf8395g60l@4ax.com>, John W
<john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote:
In fact, TM IS a religion. The religion behind TM is Hinduism.
Those
who have revealed their mantras to the investigators have
determined
that the Hindu mantra is in fact the name of a Hindu deity.
John W
Again you are talking nonsense. The mantra is a group of sounds or
words
that may or may not refer to a Deity
Phar with all due respect, the mantras used in TM are.
I was referring to the word mantra itself. My understanding is that
there
are thousands of mantras that are used and I have no doubt many refer
to
Gods. However to attack TM on the basis of chanting mantras is rather
idiotic in my opinion
You can express your opinion, and I can express mine. Part of the
reason I came to my belief in the evils of TM is that I personally met
and interviewed the former Hindu Swami/Guru
Rabindranath ("Robby") R. Maharaj, a Christian pastor now.
Robby wrote a book which I read, which many in our church read, "Death
of a Guru". He said that the mantra IS generally the name of one of
the countless Hindu deities. (there are certainly those who practice
"TM" without being formally inducted into the rite, and they may
choose whatever mono-syllable they like)
Robby also confirmed that chanting the name of the Hindu deity during
TM is considered a Hindu form of worship.
Like it or don't. The facts speak for themselves. If you don't like
it, take it up with the former Guru, Robby.
It seems to me that making an uneducated reply is not the wisest thing to
do.
Like I say it is simply not for me - although I otherwise very much
enjoy
aspects of Indian Culture.
That is fine for you, but there are others, that take great offence at
not
being told wthat their Hindu deity mantra truly are.
Those who have come out of TM and later found out that they were
actually worshipping Hindu deities (those I have encountered) get VERY
upset by the deceptive nature of TM.
Interestingly, many years ago, when the Hindus tried to recruit
American converts, no one was interested. They eventually figured out
that if they disguised it as Yoga or TM, they'd get converts, and
today, Yoga has swept American. Even the world's two most influential
women, Oprah and Martha, are both OPENLY devotees of Yoga and TM.
I know Martha claims to be a Roman Catholic, which makes me wonder how
Roman Catholicism can be compatible with Hinduism. Oprah OPENLY
denies being a Christian, though her dad is a pastor.
Yoga and TM are POWERFUL anti-Christian influences.
For ALL the good she's done in the world, it's kind of negated when
she OPENLY confesses that she is NOT a Christian on her TV show. And I
didn't hear ABOUT that startling declaration; I was watching Oprah the
day she said it.
Tina Turner asked Oprah if she was a Christian. Oprah's answer was
INSTANT. "No! I find it too "restrictive.""
(meaning she wants to live in sin and she knows she can't if she's a
Christian. Oprah is another person who's given up her soul for sex.)
<snip>
Good point. And I am amazed that I overlooked it. The initiate is NOT
told that he is chanting the name of a Hindu deity.
That is TOTALLY correct. Those who tried and tried and tried and tried
to recruit me insisted that the mono-syllable meant "nothing". "It's
just a sound you utter to focus you."
Either they don't know, either (I seriously doubt that), or they're
lying to potential recruits.
jw
And TM
practitioners are also lied to when they aren't told they're being
initiated into Hinduism. They are also lied to when they are told each
TM initiate receives a "totally unique" word that "no one else has."
Untrue. There are MANY more TM practitioners than there are Hindu
deities' names.
Why all the dishonesty right from the start when TM is so POSITIVE?
I smell a "pile" in the woodpile.
John W
____________________________________________________________________________
___
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source
<><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Steve Ralph" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
28 Apr 2004 11:33:59 AM |
|
|
"jw @yahoo.com>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
news:tqpu80ti3jm2m21s9113hns0mtbdar3a07@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:03:39 -0500, "Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)"
<christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote:
john w replied
Sounds to me like you were once involved in it (?)
Correct. I never allowed myself to be "initiated' and given a mantra,
but I chanted "Om" with the rest of them, and I chanted for hours at
home.
Idiot. You were not practicing TM. Chanting OM is not TM, nor anything
remotely like it.
And I had MANY friends who were involved as well. (that is, "friends"
I made while dabbling in TM.)
So you only pretended to be friends with people. That is underhand and
deceitful. Demons do stuff like that don't they?
When my pastor, Dr. Fickett, got around to preaching/teaching on the
dangers of TM, I stopped practicing it,
How can you stop what you never started?
and I stopped going to
meetings.
Which you were attending under false pretences, and pretending to be
friends with people at the meetings.
I also saw some SCARY stuff at TM meetings that I won't go into,
Why not? Come on, tell us what you saw at these meetings you were
attending under false pretences.
but I
was satisfied that it was demonic from what I saw before I ever heard
anything negative.
So what did you see?
The sermons/teaching only served to confirm my
suspicions and uneasiness.
i.e Dr Fickett, obviously well aquainted with demons, managed to reinforce
your paranoia.
You are not only an idiot but a liar as well.
Maybe I should attend your church for a while. I'll pretend to be a friendly
member of your congregation, pretend to be confirmed or whatever, and
keep a look out for demons.
Then I'll post dire warnings about your church all over the internet, but
not tell
anyone the really SCARY stuff I saw.
SR
"John W" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:biosnv47pbuv8fqo8t3fnvrpttl6nhjacg@4ax.com...
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 00:05:08 GMT, "Back by popular demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0410031000370001@ppp158.dyn27.pacific.net.au...
In article <tLkfb.9807$ui6.8833@news01.roc.ny>, "Back by popular
demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0310031534180001@ppp89.dyn12.pacific.net.au...
In article <11spnvg0pfjlknna0qkmc3a4cf8395g60l@4ax.com>, John W
<john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote:
In fact, TM IS a religion. The religion behind TM is Hinduism.
Those
who have revealed their mantras to the investigators have
determined
that the Hindu mantra is in fact the name of a Hindu deity.
John W
Again you are talking nonsense. The mantra is a group of sounds
or
words
that may or may not refer to a Deity
Phar with all due respect, the mantras used in TM are.
I was referring to the word mantra itself. My understanding is that
there
are thousands of mantras that are used and I have no doubt many
refer
to
Gods. However to attack TM on the basis of chanting mantras is
rather
idiotic in my opinion
You can express your opinion, and I can express mine. Part of the
reason I came to my belief in the evils of TM is that I personally met
and interviewed the former Hindu Swami/Guru
Rabindranath ("Robby") R. Maharaj, a Christian pastor now.
Robby wrote a book which I read, which many in our church read, "Death
of a Guru". He said that the mantra IS generally the name of one of
the countless Hindu deities. (there are certainly those who practice
"TM" without being formally inducted into the rite, and they may
choose whatever mono-syllable they like)
Robby also confirmed that chanting the name of the Hindu deity during
TM is considered a Hindu form of worship.
Like it or don't. The facts speak for themselves. If you don't like
it, take it up with the former Guru, Robby.
It seems to me that making an uneducated reply is not the wisest thing
to
do.
Like I say it is simply not for me - although I otherwise very much
enjoy
aspects of Indian Culture.
That is fine for you, but there are others, that take great offence at
not
being told wthat their Hindu deity mantra truly are.
Those who have come out of TM and later found out that they were
actually worshipping Hindu deities (those I have encountered) get VERY
upset by the deceptive nature of TM.
Interestingly, many years ago, when the Hindus tried to recruit
American converts, no one was interested. They eventually figured out
that if they disguised it as Yoga or TM, they'd get converts, and
today, Yoga has swept American. Even the world's two most influential
women, Oprah and Martha, are both OPENLY devotees of Yoga and TM.
I know Martha claims to be a Roman Catholic, which makes me wonder how
Roman Catholicism can be compatible with Hinduism. Oprah OPENLY
denies being a Christian, though her dad is a pastor.
Yoga and TM are POWERFUL anti-Christian influences.
For ALL the good she's done in the world, it's kind of negated when
she OPENLY confesses that she is NOT a Christian on her TV show. And I
didn't hear ABOUT that startling declaration; I was watching Oprah the
day she said it.
Tina Turner asked Oprah if she was a Christian. Oprah's answer was
INSTANT. "No! I find it too "restrictive.""
(meaning she wants to live in sin and she knows she can't if she's a
Christian. Oprah is another person who's given up her soul for sex.)
<snip>
Good point. And I am amazed that I overlooked it. The initiate is NOT
told that he is chanting the name of a Hindu deity.
That is TOTALLY correct. Those who tried and tried and tried and tried
to recruit me insisted that the mono-syllable meant "nothing". "It's
just a sound you utter to focus you."
Either they don't know, either (I seriously doubt that), or they're
lying to potential recruits.
jw
And TM
practitioners are also lied to when they aren't told they're being
initiated into Hinduism. They are also lied to when they are told each
TM initiate receives a "totally unique" word that "no one else has."
Untrue. There are MANY more TM practitioners than there are Hindu
deities' names.
Why all the dishonesty right from the start when TM is so POSITIVE?
I smell a "pile" in the woodpile.
John W
___________________________________________________________________________
_
___
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source
<><><><><><><><>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.669 / Virus Database: 431 - Release Date: 26/04/2004
.
|
|
|
| User: "jw" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
28 Apr 2004 03:33:54 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:33:59 +0100, "Steve Ralph"
<steve@steveralph.f9.co.uk> wrote:
john w replied under copyright
"jw @yahoo.com>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
news:tqpu80ti3jm2m21s9113hns0mtbdar3a07@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:03:39 -0500, "Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)"
<christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote:
john w replied
Sounds to me like you were once involved in it (?)
Correct. I never allowed myself to be "initiated' and given a mantra,
but I chanted "Om" with the rest of them, and I chanted for hours at
home.
Idiot.
You aren't going to get far with me when you BEGIN your comments with
insults. That merely means you're trying to one-up, "alpha-male" me.
Don't. I'm an adult. Try being one yourself.
You were not practicing TM. Chanting OM is not TM, nor anything
remotely like it.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
My sources would disagree with you. And I know too many practicers of
TM who have told me otherwise.
And I had MANY friends who were involved as well. (that is, "friends"
I made while dabbling in TM.)
So you only pretended to be friends with people.
I don't pretend. Perhaps a better term should have been
"acquaintances," since I learned EARLY to not trust them.
And why such vitriol merely for expressing my honest opinion? Did I
hit a raw nerve?
That is underhand and
deceitful.
You are putting words in my mouth and false motives in my head.
THAT is "underhanded and deceitful."
Demons do stuff like that don't they?
Since you defend TM, you are likely demonic yourself. If you weren't,
why do you SHRIEK so loud?
When my pastor, Dr. Fickett, got around to preaching/teaching on the
dangers of TM, I stopped practicing it,
How can you stop what you never started?
You weren't there, so you have NO idea what I was into or what I
wasn't. But like the true ignoramus you are, you will pretend you are
everywhere and know everything anyway.
and I stopped going to
meetings.
Which you were attending under false pretences, and pretending to be
friends with people at the meetings.
AGAIN, you pretend to be able to crawl into my head and know my
thoughts and motives. Only God can do that. God, you are not, making
you a PHONEY, and a likely candidate for demon possession.
SHRIEK!
I also saw some SCARY stuff at TM meetings that I won't go into,
Why not? Come on, tell us what you saw at these meetings you were
attending under false pretences.
Here the conversation ends, since you obviously aren't remotely
interested in any POV but your own. And what I experienced is none of
your business. Those who are TRULY interested may ask, and I'll answer
them in e-mail.
YOU can blow it out your ear, demoniac.
And quit cross-posting. I'm not interested in your demonic vomit, and
your shrieks are DEAFENING.
jw
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pedro" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
30 Apr 2004 04:41:54 PM |
|
|
"jw @yahoo.com>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
news:0s40909oqd8i0oti1bqc7gs2ssp4pqrnpf@4ax.com...
Correct. I never allowed myself to be "initiated' and given a mantra,
but I chanted "Om" with the rest of them, and I chanted for hours at
home.
That is not TM. I think you may be confused.
You were not practicing TM. Chanting OM is not TM, nor anything
remotely like it.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
My sources would disagree with you. And I know too many practicers of
TM who have told me otherwise.
Your sources are wrong.
When my pastor, Dr. Fickett, got around to preaching/teaching on the
dangers of TM, I stopped practicing it,
How can you stop what you never started?
You weren't there, so you have NO idea what I was into or what I
wasn't.
That is incorrect. You said you were never initiated.
But like the true ignoramus you are, you will pretend you are
everywhere and know everything anyway.
Can I ask you some questions?
Are you a Christian and if so how did you become one, and what change has
that made in your life? What does you shall not bear false witness mean to
you?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "LawsonE" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
29 Apr 2004 01:37:31 AM |
|
|
"jw @yahoo.com>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
news:tqpu80ti3jm2m21s9113hns0mtbdar3a07@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:03:39 -0500, "Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)"
<christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote:
john w replied
Sounds to me like you were once involved in it (?)
Correct. I never allowed myself to be "initiated' and given a mantra,
but I chanted "Om" with the rest of them, and I chanted for hours at
home.
LoL. Liar liar pants on fire. TM meditation doesn't involve chanting "om" or
anything else.
And I had MANY friends who were involved as well. (that is, "friends"
I made while dabbling in TM.)
Yeah, right.
When my pastor, Dr. Fickett, got around to preaching/teaching on the
dangers of TM, I stopped practicing it, and I stopped going to
meetings.
I also saw some SCARY stuff at TM meetings that I won't go into, but I
was satisfied that it was demonic from what I saw before I ever heard
anything negative. The sermons/teaching only served to confirm my
suspicions and uneasiness.
Uh-huh. What was in the "sermons?"
You can get the unadulterated Maharishi Mahesh Yogi message online every
week, live or via downloaded video by visiting
http://www.globalcountry.org
Some, perhaps many, Christians have legitimate reasons not to practice TM,
including:
the TM initiation ceremony mentions hindu gods (in Sanskrit); TM mantras are
used in certain hindu religious rituals (in a different way than in TM, BTW)
and are considered important to the hindu gods; the TM organization provides
no moral/ethical guidelines; the TM organization teaches, contrary to the
teaching of at least some versions of Christianity, that one CAN get better
mentally and spiritually and move towards "perfection" without professing a
specific religioius belief but merely by practicing TM; and so on...
The TM technique involves no chanting on the part of the practitioner (quite
the opposite since attempting to achieve anything specific during TM,
including saying the mantra in a specific manner, is anti-TM-technique,
since the "purpose" of TM practice is to allow the mind and body to rest and
having a goal to achieve, whether "enlightenment" or chanting the mantra, is
counter-resting). The TM organization doesn't preach a specific
moral/behavioral world-view, although you can get as involved as you want in
things like yoga, ayurveda, jyotish (hindu astrology) and so on, for the
right price. You can also choose to avoid any/all of the extra stuff, or
avoid meditation practice and only take herbal preparations, or whatever.
As I said "liar, liar, pants on fire." You never learned TM and you know it.
You're just a lying troll posing as a devout Christian for some reason or
another that has nothing to do with TM or Christianity, I'm guessing.
BTW, none of the TM mantras I've seen listed are mono-syllabic. In fact, the
TM founder, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, believes that using "om" encourages a
monastic lifestyle and isn't appropriate for busy modern people. Its
actually a bone of contention with many other monks in his religioius order
that he's using the WRONG mantras, because THEY don't use them (the reason
why Maharishi Mahesh Yogi doesn't believe that their opinion matters in this
situation should be obvious: he's teaching mediation to non-monks afterall
who never bothered to think that maybe their way isn't best for everyone).
Nor are the TM mantras the names of specific hindu gods. The TM mantras
predate hinduism and no-one knows what their original meaning (if any) is.
"John W" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:biosnv47pbuv8fqo8t3fnvrpttl6nhjacg@4ax.com...
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 00:05:08 GMT, "Back by popular demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0410031000370001@ppp158.dyn27.pacific.net.au...
In article <tLkfb.9807$ui6.8833@news01.roc.ny>, "Back by popular
demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0310031534180001@ppp89.dyn12.pacific.net.au...
In article <11spnvg0pfjlknna0qkmc3a4cf8395g60l@4ax.com>, John W
<john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote:
In fact, TM IS a religion. The religion behind TM is Hinduism.
Those
who have revealed their mantras to the investigators have
determined
that the Hindu mantra is in fact the name of a Hindu deity.
John W
Again you are talking nonsense. The mantra is a group of sounds
or
words
that may or may not refer to a Deity
Phar with all due respect, the mantras used in TM are.
I was referring to the word mantra itself. My understanding is that
there
are thousands of mantras that are used and I have no doubt many
refer
to
Gods. However to attack TM on the basis of chanting mantras is
rather
idiotic in my opinion
You can express your opinion, and I can express mine. Part of the
reason I came to my belief in the evils of TM is that I personally met
and interviewed the former Hindu Swami/Guru
Rabindranath ("Robby") R. Maharaj, a Christian pastor now.
Robby wrote a book which I read, which many in our church read, "Death
of a Guru". He said that the mantra IS generally the name of one of
the countless Hindu deities. (there are certainly those who practice
"TM" without being formally inducted into the rite, and they may
choose whatever mono-syllable they like)
Robby also confirmed that chanting the name of the Hindu deity during
TM is considered a Hindu form of worship.
Like it or don't. The facts speak for themselves. If you don't like
it, take it up with the former Guru, Robby.
It seems to me that making an uneducated reply is not the wisest thing
to
do.
Like I say it is simply not for me - although I otherwise very much
enjoy
aspects of Indian Culture.
That is fine for you, but there are others, that take great offence at
not
being told wthat their Hindu deity mantra truly are.
Those who have come out of TM and later found out that they were
actually worshipping Hindu deities (those I have encountered) get VERY
upset by the deceptive nature of TM.
Interestingly, many years ago, when the Hindus tried to recruit
American converts, no one was interested. They eventually figured out
that if they disguised it as Yoga or TM, they'd get converts, and
today, Yoga has swept American. Even the world's two most influential
women, Oprah and Martha, are both OPENLY devotees of Yoga and TM.
I know Martha claims to be a Roman Catholic, which makes me wonder how
Roman Catholicism can be compatible with Hinduism. Oprah OPENLY
denies being a Christian, though her dad is a pastor.
Yoga and TM are POWERFUL anti-Christian influences.
For ALL the good she's done in the world, it's kind of negated when
she OPENLY confesses that she is NOT a Christian on her TV show. And I
didn't hear ABOUT that startling declaration; I was watching Oprah the
day she said it.
Tina Turner asked Oprah if she was a Christian. Oprah's answer was
INSTANT. "No! I find it too "restrictive.""
(meaning she wants to live in sin and she knows she can't if she's a
Christian. Oprah is another person who's given up her soul for sex.)
<snip>
Good point. And I am amazed that I overlooked it. The initiate is NOT
told that he is chanting the name of a Hindu deity.
That is TOTALLY correct. Those who tried and tried and tried and tried
to recruit me insisted that the mono-syllable meant "nothing". "It's
just a sound you utter to focus you."
Either they don't know, either (I seriously doubt that), or they're
lying to potential recruits.
jw
And TM
practitioners are also lied to when they aren't told they're being
initiated into Hinduism. They are also lied to when they are told each
TM initiate receives a "totally unique" word that "no one else has."
Untrue. There are MANY more TM practitioners than there are Hindu
deities' names.
Why all the dishonesty right from the start when TM is so POSITIVE?
I smell a "pile" in the woodpile.
John W
___________________________________________________________________________
_
___
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source
<><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
28 Apr 2004 10:15:35 PM |
|
|
(please forgive what appears to be shouting, my keypad doesn't have italics)
Even though I consider myself a mystic, I have seen no reason to go outside
the Bible in relation to meditation, which unlike the "emptying the mind" of
the Eastern meditative forms, teaches to meditate ON SOMETHING and to FILL
THE MIND with this or that, example Philippians 4:8
"jw @yahoo.com>" <john_weatherly47<no> wrote in message
news:tqpu80ti3jm2m21s9113hns0mtbdar3a07@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:03:39 -0500, "Glenn \(Christian Mystic\)"
<christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote:
john w replied
Sounds to me like you were once involved in it (?)
Correct. I never allowed myself to be "initiated' and given a mantra,
but I chanted "Om" with the rest of them, and I chanted for hours at
home.
And I had MANY friends who were involved as well. (that is, "friends"
I made while dabbling in TM.)
When my pastor, Dr. Fickett, got around to preaching/teaching on the
dangers of TM, I stopped practicing it, and I stopped going to
meetings.
I also saw some SCARY stuff at TM meetings that I won't go into, but I
was satisfied that it was demonic from what I saw before I ever heard
anything negative. The sermons/teaching only served to confirm my
suspicions and uneasiness.
"John W" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:biosnv47pbuv8fqo8t3fnvrpttl6nhjacg@4ax.com...
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 00:05:08 GMT, "Back by popular demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0410031000370001@ppp158.dyn27.pacific.net.au...
In article <tLkfb.9807$ui6.8833@news01.roc.ny>, "Back by popular
demand"
<Nospam@Nono.Nothere> wrote:
" *Phar Lap*" <camelraces@AliceSprings.com> wrote in message
news:camelraces-0310031534180001@ppp89.dyn12.pacific.net.au...
In article <11spnvg0pfjlknna0qkmc3a4cf8395g60l@4ax.com>, John W
<john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote:
In fact, TM IS a religion. The religion behind TM is Hinduism.
Those
who have revealed their mantras to the investigators have
determined
that the Hindu mantra is in fact the name of a Hindu deity.
John W
Again you are talking nonsense. The mantra is a group of sounds
or
words
that may or may not refer to a Deity
Phar with all due respect, the mantras used in TM are.
I was referring to the word mantra itself. My understanding is that
there
are thousands of mantras that are used and I have no doubt many
refer
to
Gods. However to attack TM on the basis of chanting mantras is
rather
idiotic in my opinion
You can express your opinion, and I can express mine. Part of the
reason I came to my belief in the evils of TM is that I personally met
and interviewed the former Hindu Swami/Guru
Rabindranath ("Robby") R. Maharaj, a Christian pastor now.
Robby wrote a book which I read, which many in our church read, "Death
of a Guru". He said that the mantra IS generally the name of one of
the countless Hindu deities. (there are certainly those who practice
"TM" without being formally inducted into the rite, and they may
choose whatever mono-syllable they like)
Robby also confirmed that chanting the name of the Hindu deity during
TM is considered a Hindu form of worship.
Like it or don't. The facts speak for themselves. If you don't like
it, take it up with the former Guru, Robby.
It seems to me that making an uneducated reply is not the wisest thing
to
do.
Like I say it is simply not for me - although I otherwise very much
enjoy
aspects of Indian Culture.
That is fine for you, but there are others, that take great offence at
not
being told wthat their Hindu deity mantra truly are.
Those who have come out of TM and later found out that they were
actually worshipping Hindu deities (those I have encountered) get VERY
upset by the deceptive nature of TM.
Interestingly, many years ago, when the Hindus tried to recruit
American converts, no one was interested. They eventually figured out
that if they disguised it as Yoga or TM, they'd get converts, and
today, Yoga has swept American. Even the world's two most influential
women, Oprah and Martha, are both OPENLY devotees of Yoga and TM.
I know Martha claims to be a Roman Catholic, which makes me wonder how
Roman Catholicism can be compatible with Hinduism. Oprah OPENLY
denies being a Christian, though her dad is a pastor.
Yoga and TM are POWERFUL anti-Christian influences.
For ALL the good she's done in the world, it's kind of negated when
she OPENLY confesses that she is NOT a Christian on her TV show. And I
didn't hear ABOUT that startling declaration; I was watching Oprah the
day she said it.
Tina Turner asked Oprah if she was a Christian. Oprah's answer was
INSTANT. "No! I find it too "restrictive.""
(meaning she wants to live in sin and she knows she can't if she's a
Christian. Oprah is another person who's given up her soul for sex.)
<snip>
Good point. And I am amazed that I overlooked it. The initiate is NOT
told that he is chanting the name of a Hindu deity.
That is TOTALLY correct. Those who tried and tried and tried and tried
to recruit me insisted that the mono-syllable meant "nothing". "It's
just a sound you utter to focus you."
Either they don't know, either (I seriously doubt that), or they're
lying to potential recruits.
jw
And TM
practitioners are also lied to when they aren't told they're being
initiated into Hinduism. They are also lied to when they are told each
TM initiate receives a "totally unique" word that "no one else has."
Untrue. There are MANY more TM practitioners than there are Hindu
deities' names.
Why all the dishonesty right from the start when TM is so POSITIVE?
I smell a "pile" in the woodpile.
John W
___________________________________________________________________________
_
___
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source
<><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
| User: "LawsonE" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
29 Apr 2004 01:51:09 AM |
|
|
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1090t1e6oi634be@corp.supernews.com...
(please forgive what appears to be shouting, my keypad doesn't have
italics)
Even though I consider myself a mystic, I have seen no reason to go
outside
the Bible in relation to meditation, which unlike the "emptying the mind"
of
the Eastern meditative forms, teaches to meditate ON SOMETHING and to FILL
THE MIND with this or that, example Philippians 4:8
"Samadhi" or "transcendental consciousness" isn't a matter of "emptying the
mind." That's a pisspoor translation or misinterpretation. What TM and other
dhyan meditation traditions (including some mystical Christian traditions, I
suspect) do, is allow the mind to become less active, while still remaining
aware. This allows the mind and nervous system to gain the maximum amount of
rest and to repair the maximum amount of damage that day-to-day living has
done to the nervous system.
The ultimate state of meditation, according to the TM tradition, is a state
where the mind is completely awake, while not specifically thinking
anything. Physically speaking, the brain has remained alert, but is not
paying attention to any specific object of awareness. That's where the term
"empty" may come from, but its misleading to call it that since "empty" is a
relative term that requires intellectual analysis to identify, and
intellectual analysis requires paying attention to specific objects of
attention like thoughts, concepts, logical conclusions, etc.
Some of us physically minded people believe that "samadhi" is the
fundamental spiritual "experience" that is the basis of all religious
traditions, but obviously, people who believe that only a specific religious
tradition is valid can't, by definition, agree with this because that would
mean that ANY religious tradition can lead to valid religious experience.
Additionally, a purely physical (in the sense of based on a state of the
physical nervous system) state can't possibly involve spirituality in many
people's minds (not just Christians).
Of course, some of us quote Jesus "In my Father's House are many mansions"
as meaning that our interpretation of samadhi IS valid within the Christian
tradition, but of course, many/most Christians (Jews, Moslems, and others)
disagree.
.
|
|
|
| User: "john w" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
29 Apr 2004 07:46:22 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:51:09 GMT, "LawsonE" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
john_w replied
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1090t1e6oi634be@corp.supernews.com...
(please forgive what appears to be shouting, my keypad doesn't have
italics)
Even though I consider myself a mystic, I have seen no reason to go
outside
the Bible in relation to meditation, which unlike the "emptying the mind"
of
the Eastern meditative forms, teaches to meditate ON SOMETHING and to FILL
THE MIND with this or that, example Philippians 4:8
"Samadhi" or "transcendental consciousness" isn't a matter of "emptying the
mind." That's a pisspoor translation or misinterpretation. What TM and other
dhyan meditation traditions (including some mystical Christian traditions, I
suspect) do, is allow the mind to become less active, while still remaining
aware. This allows the mind and nervous system to gain the maximum amount of
rest and to repair the maximum amount of damage that day-to-day living has
done to the nervous system.
The ultimate state of meditation, according to the TM tradition, is a state
where the mind is completely awake, while not specifically thinking
anything. Physically speaking, the brain has remained alert, but is not
paying attention to any specific object of awareness. That's where the term
"empty" may come from, but its misleading to call it that since "empty" is a
relative term that requires intellectual analysis to identify, and
intellectual analysis requires paying attention to specific objects of
attention like thoughts, concepts, logical conclusions, etc.
It's MY understanding from the TM practitioners I have known that the
"ultimate" goal / state of meditation is "enlightenment" or "Nirvana",
although the "masters" and more advanced practitioners typically
refuse to define that state. Those who HAVE achieved "enlightenment"
or "Nirvana", have revealed that is the place you come to in your
meditation where you come to REALIZE that YOU are God.
IOW, TM's goal is to deceive us into believing we are deities in our
own right.
jw
Some of us physically minded people believe that "samadhi" is the
fundamental spiritual "experience" that is the basis of all religious
traditions, but obviously, people who believe that only a specific religious
tradition is valid can't, by definition, agree with this because that would
mean that ANY religious tradition can lead to valid religious experience.
Additionally, a purely physical (in the sense of based on a state of the
physical nervous system) state can't possibly involve spirituality in many
people's minds (not just Christians).
Of course, some of us quote Jesus "In my Father's House are many mansions"
as meaning that our interpretation of samadhi IS valid within the Christian
tradition, but of course, many/most Christians (Jews, Moslems, and others)
disagree.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
04 May 2004 08:16:32 AM |
|
|
"john w" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:s98390pug0ngk4jnqa1bjb22omq330bks9@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:51:09 GMT, "LawsonE" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
john_w replied
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1090t1e6oi634be@corp.supernews.com...
(please forgive what appears to be shouting, my keypad doesn't have
italics)
Even though I consider myself a mystic, I have seen no reason to go
outside
the Bible in relation to meditation, which unlike the "emptying the
mind"
of
the Eastern meditative forms, teaches to meditate ON SOMETHING and to
FILL
THE MIND with this or that, example Philippians 4:8
"Samadhi" or "transcendental consciousness" isn't a matter of "emptying
the
mind." That's a pisspoor translation or misinterpretation. What TM and
other
dhyan meditation traditions (including some mystical Christian
traditions, I
suspect) do, is allow the mind to become less active, while still
remaining
aware. This allows the mind and nervous system to gain the maximum amount
of
rest and to repair the maximum amount of damage that day-to-day living
has
done to the nervous system.
The ultimate state of meditation, according to the TM tradition, is a
state
where the mind is completely awake, while not specifically thinking
anything. Physically speaking, the brain has remained alert, but is not
paying attention to any specific object of awareness. That's where the
term
"empty" may come from, but its misleading to call it that since "empty"
is a
relative term that requires intellectual analysis to identify, and
intellectual analysis requires paying attention to specific objects of
attention like thoughts, concepts, logical conclusions, etc.
It's MY understanding from the TM practitioners I have known that the
"ultimate" goal / state of meditation is "enlightenment" or "Nirvana",
Doesn't "Nirvana" mean the void / nothingness ?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "LawsonE" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
29 Apr 2004 08:31:28 PM |
|
|
"john w" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:s98390pug0ngk4jnqa1bjb22omq330bks9@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:51:09 GMT, "LawsonE" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
john_w replied
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1090t1e6oi634be@corp.supernews.com...
(please forgive what appears to be shouting, my keypad doesn't have
italics)
Even though I consider myself a mystic, I have seen no reason to go
outside
the Bible in relation to meditation, which unlike the "emptying the
mind"
of
the Eastern meditative forms, teaches to meditate ON SOMETHING and to
FILL
THE MIND with this or that, example Philippians 4:8
"Samadhi" or "transcendental consciousness" isn't a matter of "emptying
the
mind." That's a pisspoor translation or misinterpretation. What TM and
other
dhyan meditation traditions (including some mystical Christian
traditions, I
suspect) do, is allow the mind to become less active, while still
remaining
aware. This allows the mind and nervous system to gain the maximum amount
of
rest and to repair the maximum amount of damage that day-to-day living
has
done to the nervous system.
The ultimate state of meditation, according to the TM tradition, is a
state
where the mind is completely awake, while not specifically thinking
anything. Physically speaking, the brain has remained alert, but is not
paying attention to any specific object of awareness. That's where the
term
"empty" may come from, but its misleading to call it that since "empty"
is a
relative term that requires intellectual analysis to identify, and
intellectual analysis requires paying attention to specific objects of
attention like thoughts, concepts, logical conclusions, etc.
It's MY understanding from the TM practitioners I have known that the
"ultimate" goal / state of meditation is "enlightenment" or "Nirvana",
although the "masters" and more advanced practitioners typically
refuse to define that state. Those who HAVE achieved "enlightenment"
or "Nirvana", have revealed that is the place you come to in your
meditation where you come to REALIZE that YOU are God.
IOW, TM's goal is to deceive us into believing we are deities in our
own right.
Nope. If people are saying that kind of thing, they've misunderstood TM
practice. According to Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (MMY), "enlightenment" comes in
several stages, all based on the "pure awareness" or "samadhi" state that
meditation (or prayer or reading a good book or watching a sunset) sometimes
brings about in the human nervous system.
Samadhi, or pure awareness, is a state where you are left awake and aware
without any object of awareness. It's the transition point between waking
and sleeping, between thinking about one thing and thinking about another,
between paying attention to something and then paying attention to something
else, etc. In modern physiological terms, it's the coordinating mechanism
that allows the different parts of the brain to work together as a single
entity. In medical terms, its the ultimate state of rest of the nervous
system, which allows the mind and body to repair itself and eventually
mature to the level of a fully functioning adult (which only an amazingly
few people ever attain without outside help of some kind).
The first state of enlightenment, according to MMY, is the state where the
nervous system has become strong enough and mature enough that the samadhi
state is experienced as a continuous background behind all other states of
consciousness. By the way, it is anyway, according to modern physiological
theories (if you equate "samadhi" with the coordinating mechanism of the
brain); but, according to MMY, most people never notice because they're too
distracted by all the interesting "relative" stuff that they're constantly
seeing and thinking and feeling: Its only during times of relative mental
quiet (like during meditation, prayer, watching the sunset, etc) that most
people might briefly note the transitional "watcher" state as opposed to the
state where they are watching something specifically. Someone who is
enlightened to the "first" stage, never loses this sense of "watcher" as
opposed to merely watching, even when they are fast asleep, dreaming, or in
the middle of the most demanding mental and/or physical task.
Since normally, we equate who we are by the most non-changing aspect of our
personality and beliefs and thoughts and actions, once the watcher-state
becomes always present, we automatically, without any analysis, start to
view this watcher state as our "true" self. That's why many mystical
writings make a distinction between "self" and "Self." The "self" is all of
our feelings, thoughts, beliefs, etc. The "Self" is the non-changing watcher
of all of these --in modern terms, it's the coordinating mechanism of the
brain that integrates all the parts of the brain into a sense of self and
time and memory and personal action/reaction and emotions and so on.
That's the first stage of enlightenment, according to MMY. He calls it
"Cosmic Consciousness" (CC) since "Self" is always present. It's a
refinement of the term used in the book "Cosmic Consciousness," where all
mystical states are called "Cosmic Consciousness." There are two further
states of enlightenment, according to MMY's scheme (plus an ongoing
development once one reaches the "final" stage): "God Consciousness" also
called "Glorified Cosmic Consciousness," and "Unity Consciousness." Those
are stages where religious terminology and interpretation become hard to
avoid, although MMY insists they are still physical states of the nervous
system that reflect further physical maturation and development beyond the
CC stage.
Discussion of the Unity stage is where people start to get confused and
think that mystics are saying "I am God." In a sense that is true, according
to the mystics, but in exactly the same sense found in this old joke:
The British woman visited the mystic in his Hymalian cave and finally had to
leave. She thanked him graciously for his company and said "If you're ever
in London, please drop by for a visit."
The mystic looked at her for a bit, and said "Madam, I *AM* London."
In other words, if you are in "Unity," you're "one" with everything,
including London AND God.
Here's an interesting question: can an atheistic mystic ever attain
"oneness" with God? Why or why not?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Glenn \Christian Mystic" |
|
| Title: Re: Warning about practicing transcendental meditation |
04 May 2004 08:15:05 AM |
|
|
"john w" <john_weatherly47@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:s98390pug0ngk4jnqa1bjb22omq330bks9@4ax.com...
x-no-archive: yes
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:51:09 GMT, "LawsonE" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
john_w replied
"Glenn (Christian Mystic)" <christianmystic@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:1090t1e6oi634be@corp.supernews.com...
(please forgive w | | | | | |