"James" <bireda@allvantage.com> wrote in message
news:06h1k2pa5v5hf4nik69kep6evs8e5ifq8s@4ax.com...

tripurantaka@yahoo.com
Re: Which is best- Hinduism, xtianity or islam?

All agree God created the world and has responsibility for its welfare
and protection. All agree God should be worshipped.

Hindus accept that the Lord taught them what they should do, came
personally many times, lived amongst them (Gita 4-7) and promised to
come again and again whenever there are serious problems. God came, got
married and showed how to deal with human conflicts and situations

Xtians say God Himself will never come, but sent His son once. The son
will come again. Jesus never married ( despite Dan Brown) and
disappeared at age 33, they say.

Muslims say God will never come Himself, but sends only human
messengers. The latest messenger ( accepted by them) is said to have
lived the best life possible, as an example

Hindus say God may be worshipped in any manner so long as the worship
is with respect,love and devotion.

Xtians say the worship should be only through Jesus and not anything
else ever

Muslims say God should be worshipped only as the formless and never
through an image etc.

Which is best?

Hello,

The question should be, which is the truth?

That, a person will have to determine for himself.

Without getting into numerous things which help to show which one is
true, there should be one logical conclusion. If God had things
written that He wants humans to know, then one would expect that He
would make it possible for most of mankind to have access to such
writings. Of all the 'Holy Books', which one is the most widely
distributed throughout the world? As the World Book Encyclopedia says:

"The Bible is the most widely distributed book in history. It has also
been translated more times, and into more languages, than any other
book."

Yes, that would be a first step in determining which of those
religions you mention above is the true one. (more 'steps' about the
true religion if you are interested)

So, Marlboros are more true than Kents, then. Thanks for the methodology
to
determine truth through "distribution". It is nonsense, but it surely
saves
a lot of time.

regards
Milan