friend Rod wrote:
friend Jim Chinnis wrote:
convicted neighbor Susan <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote in part:
friend Jim Chinnis wrote:
After looking over the long list in my kill files, I'd have to disagree.
I'm thinking about two different docs. Who've tangled.
I think both are well represented. I just don't think lack of anonymity
is any kind of safeguard.
Lack of anonymity would surely reduce the number of outright illegal acts.
And 90% (by my guess) of the ugliness would end when children's parents saw
their posts.
Yes, it would. I am in favor of it, but my opinion is not the only
one that counts, and that is a good thing. Of course there are those as
I said that do not want it, and when moral issues are forced upon them
they have been known to scream fascist, and but not without reason. I
would hope that they would have concern enough to be for the idea of
protecting themselves and their children as well.
Rod
Very rare is the opportunity to witness the evil that folks usually
hide when their identities are known.
Know that this is what GOD is seeing all time and HE knows our
identities ! ! !
It should now be little wonder that this world is utterly and
irrevocably doomed since being cursed when sin entered it through Eve
and Adam (Genesis):
http://SecondLaw.com
Meanwhile, newbies seeking a response from a cardiologist have this
alternative:
http://ABChung.LiveJournal.com
Be hungry... be healthy... be blessed:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com
Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist
.