Separation between Church and State



 Religions > Bible > Separation between Church and State

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "Terry Cross"
Date: 23 Mar 2006 03:52:49 PM
Object: Separation between Church and State
A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."
TCross
.

User: "bam"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 05:34:54 PM
"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross

Congress needs a crucifix - maybe they'd remember to tell the truth.
BAM
.
User: "Bonnie Bitch"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 05:43:34 PM
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:34:54 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net>


"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross


Congress needs a crucifix - maybe they'd remember to tell the truth.

Why? It hasn't helped your cult masters.
.
User: "bam"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 07:50:05 PM
"Bonnie *****" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote in message
news:jkc6221jgrj3543372a9fdqhtf1epfpdsp@4ax.com...

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:34:54 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net>


"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross


Congress needs a crucifix - maybe they'd remember to tell the truth.


Why? It hasn't helped your cult masters.

You discredit yourself in no time.
BAM
.
User: "Bonnie Bitch"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 07:53:40 PM
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:50:05 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net>


"Bonnie *****" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote in message
news:jkc6221jgrj3543372a9fdqhtf1epfpdsp@4ax.com...

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:34:54 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net>


"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross


Congress needs a crucifix - maybe they'd remember to tell the truth.


Why? It hasn't helped your cult masters.


You discredit yourself in no time.

Quit talking to yourself.
And the crucifix still hasn't helped your cult masters (or any
christstain) tell the truth.
"Homosexuality is regarded as shameful by barbarians and by those who
live under despotic governments just as philosophy is regarded as
shameful by them, because it is apparently not in the interest of such
rulers to have great ideas engendered in their subjects, or powerful
friendships or passionate love-all of which homosexuality is
particularly apt to produce." -- Plato
.
User: "Alberich"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 08:11:46 PM
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:53:40 -0800, Bonnie *****
<bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:50:05 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net>


"Bonnie *****" <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote in message
news:jkc6221jgrj3543372a9fdqhtf1epfpdsp@4ax.com...

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:34:54 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "bam"
<mcca5761@bellsouthblahblah.net>


"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross


Congress needs a crucifix - maybe they'd remember to tell the truth.


Why? It hasn't helped your cult masters.


You discredit yourself in no time.


Quit talking to yourself.
And the crucifix still hasn't helped your cult masters (or any
christstain) tell the truth.

"Homosexuality is regarded as shameful by barbarians and by those who
live under despotic governments just as philosophy is regarded as
shameful by them, because it is apparently not in the interest of such
rulers to have great ideas engendered in their subjects, or powerful
friendships or passionate love-all of which homosexuality is
particularly apt to produce." -- Plato

"Honesty is for the most part less profitable than dishonesty." --
Plato
"Love is a serious mental disease." -- Plato
But, hey! Quote Plato to support anything...he's Plato!
Alberich
.




User: "bowman"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 09:58:15 PM
bam wrote:

Congress needs a crucifix - maybe they'd remember to tell the truth.

No, Congress needs a few crucifixions.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.


User: "Mary Hogan"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 04:02:12 PM
"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross

Political correctness is a disease that squeezes the life out of society.
It stinks.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
User: "The Chief Instigator"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 08:02:31 PM
"Mary Hogan" <hoogy@zoominternet.net> writes:

"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."
TCross

Political correctness is a disease that squeezes the life out of society.

It stinks.

Agreed, just as the government has no business promoting any church. If Chimp
43's handlers keep trying to violate that, someone likely will decide to
separate a few churches from the state with a little C4.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (patrick@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2005-06 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: San Antonio 1, Houston 0 (OT) (March 19)
NEXT GAME: Thursday, March 23 at Omaha, 7:05
.

User: "Sanitys Little Helper"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 24 Mar 2006 12:27:33 AM
Mary Hogan ought to have wrote:


Trolling is a disease that squeezes the life out of Usenet.

It stinks.


and then STFU and FOAD



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Snivelling coward.
.

User: "Bonnie Bitch"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 05:03:20 PM
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:02:12 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Mary Hogan"
<hoogy@zoominternet.net>


"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross


Political correctness is a disease that squeezes the life out of society.

It stinks.

Yeahyeahyeah, boo-hoo, no more calling out the fags, dykes, kikes,
niggers, wops, dagos, micks, gooks, chinks, injuns, ragheads, and sand
niggers for you. Tissue, babe?
.
User: "Borked Pseudo Mailed"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 08:54:58 PM
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Bonnie ***** <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:02:12 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Mary Hogan"
<hoogy@zoominternet.net>


"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross


Political correctness is a disease that squeezes the life out of society.

It stinks.


Yeahyeahyeah, boo-hoo, no more calling out the fags, dykes, kikes,
niggers, wops, dagos, micks, gooks, chinks, injuns, ragheads, and sand
niggers for you. Tissue, babe?

you've got to be the worst flaming queer on these newsgroups. When people
say that queers aren't deviant and twisted, they should look at or listen
to you and be instantly convinced otherwise. Now I'm going to have to
filter you out because you are such a repulsive scumbag. You will burn in
hell, fagboy... and all of the politically correct ***** that comes out of
your mouth won't help you one bit... hehe
.
User: "maf 1029"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 10:16:07 PM
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:54:58 -0700 (MST), the faaaaabulous supreme
deity Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab
parties, opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of
Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net>

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Bonnie ***** <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:02:12 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Mary Hogan"
<hoogy@zoominternet.net>


"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross


Political correctness is a disease that squeezes the life out of society.

It stinks.


Yeahyeahyeah, boo-hoo, no more calling out the fags, dykes, kikes,
niggers, wops, dagos, micks, gooks, chinks, injuns, ragheads, and sand
niggers for you. Tissue, babe?


you've got to be the worst flaming queer on these newsgroups.

I yield that honor to you, christstain.
Clearly, you win.

say that queers aren't deviant and twisted, they should look at or listen
to you and be instantly convinced otherwise. Now I'm going to have to
filter you out because you are such a repulsive scumbag.

Put the mirror down, christstain, and quit whining about how you're
not allowed to call people niggers anymore. Reject PC all you want,
*****, but you people are goin' down! LOL

You will burn in
hell, fagboy... and all of the politically correct ***** that comes out of
your mouth won't help you one bit... hehe

And you still will be called out as the racist assloaf you are when
you whine that you can't use the word ***** anymore, christstain.
Go catch cancer and die painfully --
Bonnie *****
.


User: "Anonyma"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 24 Mar 2006 12:27:32 PM
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Bonnie ***** <bonnieb@fifismaxi.pad> wrote:

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:02:12 -0500, the faaaaabulous supreme deity
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli, Ruler of the heavens and host of fab parties,
opened the heavens and shone his light upon the wisdom of "Mary Hogan"
<hoogy@zoominternet.net>


"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross


Political correctness is a disease that squeezes the life out of society.

It stinks.


Yeahyeahyeah, boo-hoo, no more calling out the fags, dykes, kikes,
niggers, wops, dagos, micks, gooks, chinks, injuns, ragheads, and sand
niggers for you. Tissue, babe?

you've got to be the worst flaming queer on these newsgroups. When people
say that queers aren't deviant and twisted, they should look at or listen
to you and be instantly convinced otherwise. Now I'm going to have to
filter you out because you are such a repulsive scumbag. You will burn in
hell, fagboy... and all of the politically correct ***** that comes out of
your mouth won't help you one bit... hehe
.



User: "johac"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 24 Mar 2006 12:24:30 AM
In article <1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote:

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

I'm with you on the symbols. but I think that it is more important that
preachers not preach politics and legislators legislate religion.


TCross

--
John Hachmann aa #1782
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities"
-Voltaire
Contact - Throw a .net over the .com
.

User: "Emma"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 05:11:53 PM
In article <1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>, Terry Cross
says...


A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church

Why?

as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

A crucifix in Congress would be different. That would
be favouring a religion. But a flag in a church
isn't a symbol of government, is it?
--
~*~*~
Emma
http://www.aswa.org.uk/
.
User: "Terry Cross"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 05:38:24 PM
Emma wrote:

In article <1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>, Terry Cross
says...


A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church


Why?

!

as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."


A crucifix in Congress would be different. That would
be favouring a religion. But a flag in a church
isn't a symbol of government, is it?

(Government = state? eep!!)
If the flag is not a symbol of state, child, the flag has no meaning at
all.
But your queen IS your pope, so you are excused if you cannot
understand. Just don't expect lengthy explanations from people who
have lived with this principle all their lives.
TCross
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 06:58:54 PM
Terry Cross wrote:

Emma wrote:

In article <1143150768.960656.230170@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>, Terry Cross
says...


A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church


Why?


!

as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."


A crucifix in Congress would be different. That would
be favouring a religion. But a flag in a church
isn't a symbol of government, is it?


(Government = state? eep!!)

In this case, you're referring to government,
aren't you?

If the flag is not a symbol of state, child, the flag has no meaning at
all.

It's a symbol of your country. It represents all of you.
So I'm not sure what the problem is, because surely
it can be in a church, synagogue, or any place
of worship, without indicating support for the government or
any particular political party.
.

User: "Terry Cross"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 24 Mar 2006 02:26:36 AM
randy wrote:

"Terry Cross"

emmas132003@yahoo.co.uk


A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church
as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation
between church and
state."


A crucifix in Congress would be different. That would
be favouring a religion. But a flag in a church
isn't a symbol of government, is it?


I wrote "church and state." The Supreme Court wrote
"church and
state." Why is that hard to understand? The government
is only a part of "state."


"State" is often synonymous with "government."

You and I know that "state" and "government" are not synonymous,
however. Not in common usage, and not by definition:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=state
10. A body politic, especially one constituting a nation: the states
of Eastern Europe.
11. One of the more or less internally autonomous territorial and
political units composing a federation under a sovereign government:
the 48 contiguous states of the Union.
Would you equate the management of GM with the GM corporation? I
should hope not. The management might make that mistake, but the
shareholders never would. Nor would the engineers and other workers.

Regardless,
it seems nonsensical to suggest the Christian Church should
not have an American flag.

It is disgusting.

That is their prerogative. That
is their American freedom. The State bequeaths upon its
citizens the right to practise religion of any kind,
including a religion that honors its own State.

Excuse me, but I was not criticizing the government or the laws of the
United States. I was criticizing the churches. By flying the flag,
the churches indicate they have become followers of state policy.
Do you recall the time when the church was called "sanctuary?" The
king's soldiers could not pursue a fugitive into the church, because
the church was a law unto itself. I like that model.
However, the church that flies the flag declares itself void of any
higher calling. You might as well turn on the evening news as go to a
church sermon under the flag. I would feel like a Nazi sitting under a
swastika to go to church under a flag - not by reason of modern US war
policy, but by reason of the utter dominance of state power over
anything and everything, including the minds of the people sitting in a
pew.
I draw to your attention that the churches never used to fly the flag.
This nonsense came about only in the last few years. I would feel more
defiled to attend such a church as to wear a Tommy Hilfiger shirt to my
wedding.

Neither do I see it as a bad thing for our State to favor a
particular religion. It's like saying that it's wrong for
our government to make a choice between European government
and Indian tribal government. A choice sometimes should be
made.

Such choice cannot be avoided.

I think if the choice was between Christianity and
no religion at all, the government should choose
Christianity.

By all means.

If the choice was between Christianity and no
favored religion, I still think the government should choose
Christianity. And if the choice is between a supposed
religious neutrality and Christianity, again I would choose
Christianity, because apart from religion a neutral
government loses its spirituality.

Neutrality cannot be achieved because we have no objective measurement
of religious neutrality. Every time the individual administrator
exercises judgment, she should use her best judgment. And if she is a
Christian, she will use her Christian values - in fact, her judgement
will always be colored by her religion.
That is the nature of humankind.
TCross
.
User: "randy"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 24 Mar 2006 12:34:57 PM
"Terry Cross"

randy

"State" is often synonymous with "government."

You and I know that "state" and "government" are not
synonymous,
however. Not in common usage, and not by definition:

I don't agree. I *often* refer to the State in terms of the
government, largely because in a republic the government
holds the actual power on behalf of all the citizens of a
State.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=state
10. A body politic, especially one constituting a nation:
the states
of Eastern Europe.
11. One of the more or less internally autonomous
territorial and
political units composing a federation under a sovereign
government:
the 48 contiguous states of the Union.

There are many more definitions that these. A republican
government is an entity representing the citizens of an
entire State.

Would you equate the management of GM with the GM
corporation? I
should hope not. The management might make that mistake,
but the
shareholders never would. Nor would the engineers and
other workers.

Yes, GM management would be a "shortcut" for the GM
corporation.

Regardless,
it seems nonsensical to suggest the Christian Church
should
not have an American flag.

It is disgusting.

The Christian religion often declares submission to its
government out of a need to model "law and order." In this
case, Christians themselves participated in developing the
American kind of government. The fact that the American
political system guarantees freedom of religion is something
Christians take pride in. Having a flag in the church is not
an essential agreement with everything that the government
does. I think perhaps you read too much into this very
simple form of freedom, to have a flag in a religious
building during a religious service. I find you an
interesting person, Terry, and I do think there is a point
to be made. We shouldn't blindly follow our political
representatives.

Excuse me, but I was not criticizing the government or the
laws of the
United States. I was criticizing the churches. By flying
the flag,
the churches indicate they have become followers of state
policy.

Yes, I thought that's where you're coming from. I just think
you're reading way too much into this. A church can fly the
American flag without giving support to the Iraq war, for
example. Some may view displays of patriotism today as some
kind of right-wing statement or some kind of militant
agenda. But the flag is simply a statement of political
unity. Sure there are naive people who don't realize they
are being manipulated by propaganda. But we can't control
what people think. We can send people to public schools and
encourage them on to higher education, and still they may
not learn to be critical thinkers.

Do you recall the time when the church was called
"sanctuary?" The
king's soldiers could not pursue a fugitive into the
church, because
the church was a law unto itself. I like that model.

Well there's a certain nostalgia to that. I like it too.

However, the church that flies the flag declares itself
void of any
higher calling. You might as well turn on the evening
news as go to a
church sermon under the flag. I would feel like a Nazi
sitting under a
swastika to go to church under a flag - not by reason of
modern US war
policy, but by reason of the utter dominance of state
power over
anything and everything, including the minds of the people
sitting in a
pew.

I think we need to learn to accept our political leadership
no matter what party is in control. I've attended Mormon
churches, though I'm a more conventional Christian. And I
listen to Democrat-biased talk programs, though I lean more
towards the Republican party. We need to learn to sit under
symbols we don't like, and to calmly approach the issues in
a rational way. Rearranging symbols can accomplish a little.
But the substance lies beneath the symbolism, I think.

I draw to your attention that the churches never used to
fly the flag.
This nonsense came about only in the last few years. I
would feel more
defiled to attend such a church as to wear a Tommy
Hilfiger shirt to my
wedding.

That's not true at all. What makes you think this only came
about in the last few years? I've seen American flags flying
in both worship services and in the buildings of Christian
organizations all my life! Of course I haven't been in all
churches across America. Here is an interesting quick-look
at the issue:
http://www.witherspoonsociety.org/flags_in_church.htm

Neutrality cannot be achieved because we have no objective
measurement
of religious neutrality. Every time the individual
administrator
exercises judgment, she should use her best judgment. And
if she is a
Christian, she will use her Christian values - in fact,
her judgement
will always be colored by her religion.
That is the nature of humankind.

I do understand, Terry, that this has become, in the last
few years, a bigger issue. So your concerns are noted. I've
been somewhat divided over the war in Iraq, but I look at
the flag as a kind of political process that I only hope
works out...
randy
.
User: "Terry Cross"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 24 Mar 2006 03:56:38 PM
randy wrote:

"Terry Cross"

randy

"State" is often synonymous with "government."


You and I know that "state" and "government" are not
synonymous,
however. Not in common usage, and not by definition:


I don't agree. I *often* refer to the State in terms of the
government, largely because in a republic the government
holds the actual power on behalf of all the citizens of a
State.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=state
10. A body politic, especially one constituting a nation:
the states
of Eastern Europe.
11. One of the more or less internally autonomous
territorial and
political units composing a federation under a sovereign
government:
the 48 contiguous states of the Union.


There are many more definitions that these. A republican
government is an entity representing the citizens of an
entire State.

Would you equate the management of GM with the GM
corporation? I
should hope not. The management might make that mistake,
but the
shareholders never would. Nor would the engineers and
other workers.


Yes, GM management would be a "shortcut" for the GM
corporation.

Regardless,
it seems nonsensical to suggest the Christian Church
should
not have an American flag.


It is disgusting.


The Christian religion often declares submission to its
government out of a need to model "law and order." In this
case, Christians themselves participated in developing the
American kind of government. The fact that the American
political system guarantees freedom of religion is something
Christians take pride in. Having a flag in the church is not
an essential agreement with everything that the government
does. I think perhaps you read too much into this very
simple form of freedom, to have a flag in a religious
building during a religious service. I find you an
interesting person, Terry, and I do think there is a point
to be made. We shouldn't blindly follow our political
representatives.

Excuse me, but I was not criticizing the government or the
laws of the
United States. I was criticizing the churches. By flying
the flag,
the churches indicate they have become followers of state
policy.


Yes, I thought that's where you're coming from. I just think
you're reading way too much into this. A church can fly the
American flag without giving support to the Iraq war, for
example. Some may view displays of patriotism today as some
kind of right-wing statement or some kind of militant
agenda. But the flag is simply a statement of political
unity. Sure there are naive people who don't realize they
are being manipulated by propaganda. But we can't control
what people think. We can send people to public schools and
encourage them on to higher education, and still they may
not learn to be critical thinkers.

Do you recall the time when the church was called
"sanctuary?" The
king's soldiers could not pursue a fugitive into the
church, because
the church was a law unto itself. I like that model.


Well there's a certain nostalgia to that. I like it too.

However, the church that flies the flag declares itself
void of any
higher calling. You might as well turn on the evening
news as go to a
church sermon under the flag. I would feel like a Nazi
sitting under a
swastika to go to church under a flag - not by reason of
modern US war
policy, but by reason of the utter dominance of state
power over
anything and everything, including the minds of the people
sitting in a
pew.


I think we need to learn to accept our political leadership
no matter what party is in control. I've attended Mormon
churches, though I'm a more conventional Christian. And I
listen to Democrat-biased talk programs, though I lean more
towards the Republican party. We need to learn to sit under
symbols we don't like, and to calmly approach the issues in
a rational way. Rearranging symbols can accomplish a little.
But the substance lies beneath the symbolism, I think.

I draw to your attention that the churches never used to
fly the flag.
This nonsense came about only in the last few years. I
would feel more
defiled to attend such a church as to wear a Tommy
Hilfiger shirt to my
wedding.


That's not true at all. What makes you think this only came
about in the last few years? I've seen American flags flying
in both worship services and in the buildings of Christian
organizations all my life! Of course I haven't been in all
churches across America. Here is an interesting quick-look
at the issue:
http://www.witherspoonsociety.org/flags_in_church.htm

Neutrality cannot be achieved because we have no objective
measurement
of religious neutrality. Every time the individual
administrator
exercises judgment, she should use her best judgment. And
if she is a
Christian, she will use her Christian values - in fact,
her judgement
will always be colored by her religion.


That is the nature of humankind.


I do understand, Terry, that this has become, in the last
few years, a bigger issue. So your concerns are noted. I've
been somewhat divided over the war in Iraq, but I look at
the flag as a kind of political process that I only hope
works out...

Thank you very much for that reference, Randy. They thought through
some things and put them in writing better than I have done.
One final note: Historically, the flags of nations were used as a
rallying point to lead soldiers in battle. I do perceive them now to
have the same function among civilians.
At a sporting event I can see the point of flying the flag: The message
is that though we are taking the roles of different teams, we are all
of one country - or of two countries who are at peace.
In church, though, the flag is an inappropriate symbol of partisanship.
We do not display the icons of football teams, car manufacturers, or
political parties in church. In the same way, the symbols of
nationality should not be interposed between the congregation and the
Creator in the moments set aside to contemplate that relationship.
TCross
.
User: "randy"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 25 Mar 2006 12:56:16 AM
"Terry Cross"

randy
...In church, though, the flag is an inappropriate symbol
of partisanship.
We do not display the icons of football teams, car
manufacturers, or
political parties in church. In the same way, the symbols
of
nationality should not be interposed between the
congregation and the
Creator in the moments set aside to contemplate that
relationship.

The reference I gave you indicates that many Christians
agree with you. Though I don't agree with you, it isn't an
important issue with me. I can accept it either way. As you
say the politics is not part of the religion itself.
randy
.

User: "Malcolm"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 25 Mar 2006 04:09:48 AM
"Terry Cross" <tcross77@hotmail.com> wrote


In church, though, the flag is an inappropriate symbol of partisanship.
We do not display the icons of football teams, car manufacturers, or
political parties in church. In the same way, the symbols of
nationality should not be interposed between the congregation and the
Creator in the moments set aside to contemplate that relationship.

How is the cross of St George not appropriate in a church?
--
Buy my book 12 Common Atheist Arguments (refuted)
$1.25 download or $6.90 paper, available www.lulu.com
.



User: ""

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 24 Mar 2006 05:42:26 AM
Terry Cross wrote:


... I would feel more
defiled to attend such a church as to wear a Tommy Hilfiger shirt to my
wedding...

=======
Unless the shirt is extremely long, I recommend that you include a pair
of jeans.
- moshe
.




User: "Pink Unicorns"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 04:20:55 PM
Terry Cross wrote:

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

Actually I like the US flag in christian churches, it makes them easier
to torch.
.
User: "Terry Cross"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 04:23:56 PM
Pink Unicorns wrote:

Terry Cross wrote:

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."


Actually I like the US flag in christian churches, it makes them easier
to torch.

I disagree. Most churches don't have enough draft to get the flag
burning really well. You need courthouse steps.
TCross
.
User: "Ozzy"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 09:34:31 PM
Terry Cross wrote:

Pink Unicorns wrote:

Terry Cross wrote:

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."


Actually I like the US flag in christian churches, it makes them easier
to torch.


I disagree. Most churches don't have enough draft to get the flag
burning really well. You need courthouse steps.

What if you like, knock down the courthouse onto the church
first, and then torch them both at the same time?
.



User: "Hugh Betcha"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 06:11:51 PM
Terry Cross wrote:

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross

I'm with you. The state has it's duties and responsibilities; and the
Church has it's own. Hopefully, they are complementary, and not in
conflict.
H
.
User: "Terry Cross"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 09:20:52 PM
Hugh Betcha wrote:

Terry Cross wrote:

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross


I'm with you. The state has it's duties and responsibilities; and the
Church has it's own. Hopefully, they are complementary, and not in
conflict.

Disagreement is not always "conflict." Many times in the history of
the United States, ministers have expressed disapproval of public
events and public policies. I believe that is as things should be.
Everyone else can speak - newspapers, congressmen, grocers, barkeepers,
doctors - why not clergymen, whose special office is to mind the
conscience of the nation?
The IRS is continuously meddling in the affairs of churches, redefining
the non-profit status, redefining religion, and so on.
If I owned a church, I would never bother with non-profit status. I
would just make sure the church never turned a profit, and therefore
owed no tax. The freedom from the IRS would be well worth the small
tax lost by contributors.
TCross
.
User: "Olrik"

Title: Re: Separation between Church and State 23 Mar 2006 11:15:19 PM
Terry Cross wrote:

Hugh Betcha wrote:

Terry Cross wrote:

A US flag is as inappropriate in a Christian church as a crucifix in
Congress. That is the real meaning of "separation between church and
state."

TCross

I'm with you. The state has it's duties and responsibilities; and the
Church has it's own. Hopefully, they are complementary, and not in
conflict.


Disagreement is not always "conflict." Many times in the history of
the United States, ministers have expressed disapproval of public
events and public policies. I believe that is as things should be.
Everyone else can speak - newspapers, congressmen, grocers, barkeepers,
doctors - why not clergymen, whose special office is to mind the
conscience of the nation?

"Clergymen" have *no* "special office". And they can talk all they want.

The IRS is continuously meddling in the affairs of churches, redefining
the non-profit status, redefining religion, and so on.

If I owned a church, I would never bother with non-profit status. I
would just make sure the church never turned a profit, and therefore
owed no tax. The freedom from the IRS would be well worth the small
tax lost by contributors.

That's the sanest thing you ever wrote in alt.atheism.

TCross

--
Olrik
aa #1981
Qualified SMASH member
EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division
.




  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Re: The Bible - Problems between New Testament Texts
Re: The Bible - Problems between New Testament Texts
Difference between Communism and Islam
The difference between theology and bible
Re: The fundermental difference between Christianity and Islam
Re: Whats the difference between creationism and evolutionism as a religion?
Re: Whats the differences between Adventist and Baptists?
Re: Contradiction between Paul and Jesus:
Salomon's Baby Split between Mary and Eve..
The difference between life and death
Re: Contradiction between Paul and Jesus:
Between yesterday and today.
Differences Between Classical and Hellenistic Greek
Explain the difference between a "river god" (which God hates), and the theory of Natural Selection saying the river forms the species.
The Debate Between Bible Bob and Pastor Dave Begins
 

NEWER

pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER