Religions > Bible > Serve Satan - Support Bush --now that's a provocative title, --is it a new movie?
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Jack Nichols" |
| Date: |
27 Feb 2004 12:42:25 PM |
| Object: |
Serve Satan - Support Bush --now that's a provocative title, --is it a new movie? |
I love all the slimey efforts to slander a hero like John Kerry. Wasn't that
Kerry /Fonda cutout fascinating LOL
Kind of reminds one of all the claims that Oswald's head was a cut & paste job !
http://www.geocities.com/tom5515/rise.htm
.
|
|
| User: "The Last Church" |
|
| Title: Re: Serve Satan - Support Bush --now that's a provocative title, --is it a new movie? |
27 Feb 2004 07:45:56 PM |
|
|
On 27 Feb 2004 10:42:25 -0800, (Jack Nichols)
wrote:
On Thursday, the Senate reconvened and first considered was an
amendment by anti-gun Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) that would require
all handguns be sold with a mechanical safety device approved by the
Consumer Product Safety Commission(CPSC). This amendment was then
replaced with a "second degree" amendment by Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI).
The Kohl amendment is much less restrictive and also provides
liability protection for gun owners. The revised amendment passed
70-27.
The Senate next debated an amendment by Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell
(R-CO) which would permit current and retired law enforcement officers
to carry concealed firearms off duty in other states. Arguing
hysterically against the amendment, anti-gun Sen. Edward Kennedy
(D-MA) revealed his deep distrust of gun carrying even by sworn police
officers. A vote on the Campbell amendment was deferred until Tuesday.
Sen. Kennedy then introduced an amendment to ban the manufacture and
sale of "armor-piercing" ammunition. Kennedy, who actually condemned
the .30-30 Winchester cartridge during debate, wants to institute a
"performance-based" standard that would grant any future Attorney
General sweeping authority to ban any center-fire ammunition,
including most common-place rifle hunting ammunition. The standard
proposed by Sen. Kennedy was rejected in the 1980s as overly broad and
unnecessary to meet any threat posed to law enforcement officers`
safety. A vote on this NRA-opposed amendment will take place Tuesday.
The Senate next debated and voted upon two amendments seeking to gut
S. 1805. The first related to the D.C. sniper case, but the proposal
by Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) was defeated, 56-40. A "law
enforcement" exemption offered by Sen. John Corzine (D-NJ) was soundly
defeated, 56 to 38.
NRA strongly opposed both amendments. One of the strengths of S. 1805
is that it adopts the same rules for all plaintiffs, no matter how
sympathetic or unsympathetic, and no matter how notorious or mundane
their victimization. Plaintiffs` rights should depend on settled
principles of law, not on emotion or sympathy.
NRA-ILA stands totally committed to enacting S. 1805 without anti-gun
amendments, and will continue to vigorously oppose any reauthorization
of the 1994 Clinton gun ban and any attempt to ban gun shows.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
