| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
28 Jan 2008 07:04:50 PM |
| Object: |
Take Mensch to the Vet |
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. What does that spell, boys and
girls? What about He Resh Ayin? What does that spell.
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. Flashback to the Garden. Get it? Do
you understand all now? You should. I have explained it all.
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
28 Jan 2008 07:28:11 PM |
|
|
On Jan 28, 5:04=A0pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. =A0What does that spell, boys and
girls? =A0What about He Resh Ayin? =A0What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. =A0Flashback to the Garden. =A0Get it? =A0Do=
you understand all now? =A0You should. =A0I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. kali kundalini =3D mary magdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. now do you
understand everything, my friends?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mordecai mldavisplease dont" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
28 Jan 2008 08:16:58 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. What does that spell, boys and
girls? What about He Resh Ayin? What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. Flashback to the Garden. Get it? Do
you understand all now? You should. I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. kali kundalini = mary magdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Let me translate to something real simple - I used to be 25% permanently
disabled due to car accidents. The problem was balance.
You can prove this because soft tissue damage in the neck and back does not
effect the legs and feet.
Now do you understand?
You see - whilst all the above is true, and whilst I used to be 25%
permanently disabled, and I am not permanently disabled any more (which is
not quite impossible but a serious anomaly in medical literature) the
explanation above does not allow anyone else to get well from back
problems.
With a more involved theory such as "the purpose of the body is to balance
upright" and "the balance is dynamic" and "injury results in locking up
injured areas to prevent further damage" and "if the injury does not heal
quickly, the body adapts and learns to balance without using the effected
area" and "the way to recovery is to remove the defences which prevent a
vertebrae or a movement to occur ... and relearning how to use your body
without the adaptation to an injury" ... then and only then have you an
outline of a more involved theory.
A further expansion into balance muscles, enabling muscles, the way the
brain learns ... biofeedback ... and you have a rough outline.
Now add in self massage techniques and the way to learn biofeedback and a
person is then and only then able to comprehend the way to recover from
injuries.
You can create easily methods to fix otherwise incomprehensible problems.
For example, someone complained of a headache. I looked and the head was
slightly forward and slightly off-center ... so I invented a methodology
for her on the spot. "Bend your head forward until you are comfortable ....
ok now move your head slightly to the left until you feel comfortable
again. Now tighten your neck in this position. Good ... now put your finger
on your forehead and push back, holding your neck tight. Excellent ... now
keeping your head tight - rotate your shoulders and relax the shoulder
blades. Excellent. Relax the neck now."
The head is now in a different position WRT the neck, different muscles are
now required to hold the neck in place. The original muscles which are
tightening the head itself can relax ...and the cause of the headache will
disappear.
Simple stuff. After you learn the theory that is. I mean this seriously,
the people I teach invent things like this all the time. Because once you
have the theory, the techniques which people can invent are easy.
You come along - have your own theory which you have not explained - and
mock us because we do not know your theory.
It does not make you superior to me - nor do I sit and pant after your
exclusive knowledge.
I figure, if the most high wanted to show me, he would show me himself or
send someone to explain things to me. If you do not explain things to me
.... it is actually not because you are superior, but rather that you fail
to do the will of the most high in explaining your insight to others.
Your failure to do the will of G_d does not imply that the most high is
thwarted ... either he will send someone else or he will allow me not to
learn what he wants to teach me.
I am not impressed by the fact you have knowledge I have not. I have
knowledge you have not got.
Big deal.
If you wish to teach me - fine. Teach me.
If you just want to gloat and say you have superior knowledge - I am hardly
interested.
I can and do follow my own way to the most high ... directly from personal
experience ... and from the wise who are acknowledged with superior
knowledge.
And ... the real issue - I test EVERYTHING.
If this is from the most high - the outcome in your life is humility and
wonder and love. If you lack these things - it is not from the most high.
That is a simple test, not the only one.
What is the outcome of your superior knowledge?
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is
wrong, and reality is Never wrong.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
28 Jan 2008 10:37:26 PM |
|
|
On Jan 28, 6:16=A0pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. =A0What does that spell, boys and
girls? =A0What about He Resh Ayin? =A0What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. =A0Flashback to the Garden. =A0Get it? =
=A0Do
you understand all now? =A0You should. =A0I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: =A0shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. =A0kali kundalini =3D mary magdalene.=
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. =A0now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Well then, let me put it this way. There are just three important
aspects of G-D: Brahman, AHJH; Ishvara, JHVH; and Avalokiteshvara,
JHVSA. Now do you get it?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mordecai mldavisplease dont" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
28 Jan 2008 11:28:56 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Jan 28, 6:16 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. What does that spell, boys and
girls? What about He Resh Ayin? What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. Flashback to the Garden. Get it? Do
you understand all now? You should. I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. kali kundalini = mary magdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Well then, let me put it this way. There are just three important
aspects of G-D: Brahman, AHJH; Ishvara, JHVH; and Avalokiteshvara,
JHVSA. Now do you get it?
Nope ...
What is an aspect of G_d?
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is
wrong, and reality is Never wrong.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
28 Jan 2008 11:37:15 PM |
|
|
On Jan 28, 9:28=A0pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 6:16 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. =A0What does that spell, boys a=
nd
girls? =A0What about He Resh Ayin? =A0What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. =A0Flashback to the Garden. =A0Get i=
t? =A0Do
you understand all now? =A0You should. =A0I have explained it all.=
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: =A0shakti tattva, sh=
iva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. =A0kali kundalini =3D mary magdal=
ene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. =A0now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Well then, let me put it this way. =A0There are just three important
aspects of G-D: =A0Brahman, AHJH; Ishvara, JHVH; and Avalokiteshvara,
JHVSA. =A0Now do you get it?
Nope ...
What is an aspect of G_d?
Aspect of G-D is what you encounter when you race past the flaming
seraphim that is guarding the way of the tree of life.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mordecai mldavisplease dont" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
28 Jan 2008 11:59:19 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:28 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 6:16 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. What does that spell, boys and
girls? What about He Resh Ayin? What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. Flashback to the Garden. Get it? Do
you understand all now? You should. I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. kali kundalini = mary magdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Well then, let me put it this way. There are just three important
aspects of G-D: Brahman, AHJH; Ishvara, JHVH; and Avalokiteshvara,
JHVSA. Now do you get it?
Nope ...
What is an aspect of G_d?
Aspect of G-D is what you encounter when you race past the flaming
seraphim that is guarding the way of the tree of life.
I have never tried to get past the angel guarding Eden ... as it was sent to
forbid entry.
So I have never played a race with a seraphim.
I figure the most high says what he means, and means what he says ... so if he
tells me that this would not be good for humans, I believe him.
And whilst I am glad you have met an aspect of the most high, I am instructed to
go to the most high, not an aspect.
Thus you have asked me to know something i have not experienced ... and this is to
teach me? I can tell you, as a teacher - this is shocking. Try experiences I have,
not experiences you have.
And how would you know if I had the right concept if the concept is experiential
only? I could fake it - or be deceived ... otherwise you cannot mark me as
achieving this or failing. Subjective judgement of truth eliminates testing ... so
how do I test this?
Far more importantly ... why the hell would I desire to seek out a lesser thing
than I already have?
I am to go to the most high, not an aspect ...
Just curious.
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is wrong,
and reality is Never wrong.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
29 Jan 2008 03:28:51 AM |
|
|
On Jan 28, 9:59=A0pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:28 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 6:16 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. =A0What does that spell, bo=
ys and
girls? =A0What about He Resh Ayin? =A0What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. =A0Flashback to the Garden. =A0G=
et it? =A0Do
you understand all now? =A0You should. =A0I have explained it =
all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: =A0shakti tattva=
, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. =A0kali kundalini =3D mary ma=
gdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. =A0now do yo=
u
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Well then, let me put it this way. =A0There are just three important=
aspects of G-D: =A0Brahman, AHJH; Ishvara, JHVH; and Avalokiteshvara=
,
JHVSA. =A0Now do you get it?
Nope ...
What is an aspect of G_d?
Aspect of G-D is what you encounter when you race past the flaming
seraphim that is guarding the way of the tree of life.
I have never tried to get past the angel guarding Eden ... =A0as it was se=
nt to
forbid entry.
So I have never played a race with a seraphim.
I figure the most high says what he means, and means what he says ... so i=
f he
tells me that this would not be good for humans, I believe him.
And whilst I am glad you have met an aspect of the most high, I am instruc=
ted to
go to the most high, not an aspect.
Thus you have asked me to know something i have not experienced ... and th=
is is to
teach me? I can tell you, as a teacher - this is shocking. Try experiences=
I have,
not experiences you have.
And how would you know if I had the right concept if the concept is experi=
ential
only? I could fake it - or be deceived ... otherwise you cannot mark me as=
achieving this or failing. Subjective judgement of truth eliminates testin=
g ... so
how do I test this?
Far more importantly ... why the hell would I desire to seek out a lesser =
thing
than I already have?
I am to go to the most high, not an aspect ...
Just curious.
--
Mordecai!
You got ***** Mordecai! You go to the most high, and even if you're
moses he shows you his backside. You take evil for good, and say "ah,
the lord is good." you dumb *****, he showed you his backside, his
evil side, his yetzer hara. you take the evil for good or say the
lord has no yetzer hara, but that's all you know Mordecai!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mordecai mldavisplease dont" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
29 Jan 2008 03:53:50 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:59 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:28 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 6:16 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. What does that spell, boys and
girls? What about He Resh Ayin? What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. Flashback to the Garden. Get it? Do
you understand all now? You should. I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. kali kundalini = mary magdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Well then, let me put it this way. There are just three important
aspects of G-D: Brahman, AHJH; Ishvara, JHVH; and Avalokiteshvara,
JHVSA. Now do you get it?
Nope ...
What is an aspect of G_d?
Aspect of G-D is what you encounter when you race past the flaming
seraphim that is guarding the way of the tree of life.
I have never tried to get past the angel guarding Eden ... as it was sent to
forbid entry.
So I have never played a race with a seraphim.
I figure the most high says what he means, and means what he says ... so if he
tells me that this would not be good for humans, I believe him.
And whilst I am glad you have met an aspect of the most high, I am instructed to
go to the most high, not an aspect.
Thus you have asked me to know something i have not experienced ... and this is to
teach me? I can tell you, as a teacher - this is shocking. Try experiences I have,
not experiences you have.
And how would you know if I had the right concept if the concept is experiential
only? I could fake it - or be deceived ... otherwise you cannot mark me as
achieving this or failing. Subjective judgement of truth eliminates testing ... so
how do I test this?
Far more importantly ... why the hell would I desire to seek out a lesser thing
than I already have?
I am to go to the most high, not an aspect ...
Just curious.
--
Mordecai!
You got ***** Mordecai! You go to the most high, and even if you're
moses he shows you his backside. You take evil for good, and say "ah,
the lord is good." you dumb *****, he showed you his backside, his
evil side, his yetzer hara. you take the evil for good or say the
lord has no yetzer hara, but that's all you know Mordecai!
You have not answered the questions I raised ... except to say that the most high has
shown me things to destroy me.
I can test that as well ...
In the mean time - please answer the questions.
Truth is not in your opinion or mine - but in reality.
I am willing to test your propositions - but I told you that. I test EVERYTHING I can.
if you want to teach me - and you know I test everything - then your teachings must be
tested.
You agreed to teach knowing the stipulation.
If you refuse to test - all this proves is that you are not a teacher - not that your
ideas are incorrect.
If your teaching skills are high, and the thing you teach is wrong, the thing you teach
is still wrong.
If your teaching skills are low, and what you teach is correct, then that remains
correct despite you lack of conveying the truth to others.
You, Me, your truth, my truth and indeed even the most high are all in trial.
Truth is the goal.
I will pay whatever is required for truth.
But I have stopped following others many years ago.
If you have truth - it will be shown in fruit ... reality, knowledge and a reflection
of the heart of the most high.
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is wrong, and
reality is Never wrong.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "cactus" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
29 Jan 2008 12:31:45 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:59 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:28 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 6:16 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. What does that spell, boys and
girls? What about He Resh Ayin? What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. Flashback to the Garden. Get it? Do
you understand all now? You should. I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. kali kundalini = mary magdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Well then, let me put it this way. There are just three important
aspects of G-D: Brahman, AHJH; Ishvara, JHVH; and Avalokiteshvara,
JHVSA. Now do you get it?
Nope ...
What is an aspect of G_d?
Aspect of G-D is what you encounter when you race past the flaming
seraphim that is guarding the way of the tree of life.
I have never tried to get past the angel guarding Eden ... as it was sent to
forbid entry.
So I have never played a race with a seraphim.
I figure the most high says what he means, and means what he says ... so if he
tells me that this would not be good for humans, I believe him.
And whilst I am glad you have met an aspect of the most high, I am instructed to
go to the most high, not an aspect.
Thus you have asked me to know something i have not experienced ... and this is to
teach me? I can tell you, as a teacher - this is shocking. Try experiences I have,
not experiences you have.
And how would you know if I had the right concept if the concept is experiential
only? I could fake it - or be deceived ... otherwise you cannot mark me as
achieving this or failing. Subjective judgement of truth eliminates testing ... so
how do I test this?
Far more importantly ... why the hell would I desire to seek out a lesser thing
than I already have?
I am to go to the most high, not an aspect ...
Just curious.
--
Mordecai!
You got ***** Mordecai! You go to the most high, and even if you're
moses he shows you his backside. You take evil for good, and say "ah,
the lord is good." you dumb *****, he showed you his backside, his
evil side, his yetzer hara. you take the evil for good or say the
lord has no yetzer hara, but that's all you know Mordecai!
He's confused. One more example of mixing up G-d's backside with evil.
He's just an ignorant shegits. He'll never understand.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
29 Jan 2008 04:50:15 PM |
|
|
On Jan 29, 10:31 am, cactus <cac...@nonespam.com> wrote:
He's confused. One more example of mixing up G-d's backside with evil.
He's just an ignorant shegits. He'll never understand.
Here is the textual proof:
Exodus 33 (JPS):
17 And the LORD said unto Moses: 'I will do this thing also that thou
hast spoken, for thou hast found grace in My sight, and I know thee by
name.' 18 And he said: 'Show me, I pray Thee, Thy glory.' 19 And He
said: 'I will make all My goodness pass before thee, and will proclaim
the name of the LORD before thee; and I will be gracious to whom I
will be gracious, and will show mercy on whom I will show mercy.' 20
And He said: 'Thou canst not see My face, for man shall not see Me and
live.' 21 And the LORD said: 'Behold, there is a place by Me, and thou
shalt stand upon the rock. 22 And it shall come to pass, while My
glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a cleft of the rock, and
will cover thee with My hand until I have passed by. 23 And I will
take away My hand, and thou shalt see My back; but My face shall not
be seen.'
Now, what does "all My goodness" in verse 19 mean?
As Genesis Rabbah teaches:
And God saw all that He had made, and found it very good...vehinei tov
zeh yetzer hatov, vehinei tov me'od zeh yetzer hara - "good" refers to
the Good Inclination but "very good" refers to the Evil Inclination.
Why? Because were it not for the Yetzer ha-Ra no one would build a
house, take a wife, give birth, or engage in commerce.
QED
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Linda Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
29 Jan 2008 07:46:01 AM |
|
|
On Jan 28, 9:16=A0pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
Let me translate to something real simple - I used to be 25% permanently
disabled due to car accidents. The problem was balance.
You can prove this because soft tissue damage in the neck and back does no=
t
effect the legs and feet.
Now do you understand?
You see - whilst all the above is true, and whilst I used to be 25%
permanently disabled, and I am not permanently disabled any more (which is=
not quite impossible but a serious anomaly in medical literature) the
explanation above does not allow anyone else to get well from back
problems.
With a more involved theory such as "the purpose of the body is to balance=
upright" and "the balance is dynamic" and "injury =A0results in locking up=
injured areas to prevent further damage" and "if the injury does not heal
quickly, the body adapts and learns to balance without using the effected
area" and "the way to recovery is to remove the defences which prevent a
vertebrae or a movement to occur ... and relearning how to use your body
without the adaptation to an injury" ... then and only then have you an
outline =A0of a more involved theory.
A further expansion into balance muscles, enabling muscles, the way the
brain learns ... biofeedback ... and you have a rough outline.
Now add in self massage techniques and the way to learn biofeedback and a
person is then and only then able =A0to comprehend the way to recover from=
injuries.
You can create easily methods to fix otherwise incomprehensible problems.
For example, someone complained of a headache. I looked and the head was
slightly forward and slightly off-center ... so I invented a methodology
for her on the spot. "Bend your head forward until you are comfortable ...=
..
ok now move your head slightly to the left until you feel comfortable
again. Now tighten your neck in this position. Good ... now put your finge=
r
on your forehead and push back, holding your neck tight. Excellent ... now=
keeping your head tight - rotate your shoulders and relax the shoulder
blades. Excellent. Relax the neck now."
The head is now in a different position WRT the neck, different muscles ar=
e
now required to hold the neck in place. The original muscles which are
tightening the head itself can relax ...and the cause of the headache will=
disappear.
Simple stuff. After you learn the theory that is. I mean this seriously,
the people I teach invent things like this all the time. Because once you
have the theory, the techniques which people can invent are easy.
I believe that is effective, because I've long noticed people get all
crippled up with age when they've suffered injury and then begin using
their body wrongly, and wind up becoming stiffened up rather
permanently in an unnatural position.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Linda Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
29 Jan 2008 06:42:26 AM |
|
|
On Jan 28, 9:16=A0pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. =A0What does that spell, boys and
girls? =A0What about He Resh Ayin? =A0What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. =A0Flashback to the Garden. =A0Get it? =
=A0Do
you understand all now? =A0You should. =A0I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: =A0shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. =A0kali kundalini =3D mary magdalene.=
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. =A0now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Let me translate to something real simple - I used to be 25% permanently
disabled due to car accidents. The problem was balance.
You can prove this because soft tissue damage in the neck and back does no=
t
effect the legs and feet.
Now do you understand?
You see - whilst all the above is true, and whilst I used to be 25%
permanently disabled, and I am not permanently disabled any more (which is=
not quite impossible but a serious anomaly in medical literature) the
explanation above does not allow anyone else to get well from back
problems.
With a more involved theory such as "the purpose of the body is to balance=
upright" and "the balance is dynamic" and "injury =A0results in locking up=
injured areas to prevent further damage" and "if the injury does not heal
quickly, the body adapts and learns to balance without using the effected
area" and "the way to recovery is to remove the defences which prevent a
vertebrae or a movement to occur ... and relearning how to use your body
without the adaptation to an injury" ... then and only then have you an
outline =A0of a more involved theory.
A further expansion into balance muscles, enabling muscles, the way the
brain learns ... biofeedback ... and you have a rough outline.
Now add in self massage techniques and the way to learn biofeedback and a
person is then and only then able =A0to comprehend the way to recover from=
injuries.
You can create easily methods to fix otherwise incomprehensible problems.
For example, someone complained of a headache. I looked and the head was
slightly forward and slightly off-center ... so I invented a methodology
for her on the spot. "Bend your head forward until you are comfortable ...=
..
ok now move your head slightly to the left until you feel comfortable
again. Now tighten your neck in this position. Good ... now put your finge=
r
on your forehead and push back, holding your neck tight. Excellent ... now=
keeping your head tight - rotate your shoulders and relax the shoulder
blades. Excellent. Relax the neck now."
The head is now in a different position WRT the neck, different muscles ar=
e
now required to hold the neck in place. The original muscles which are
tightening the head itself can relax ...and the cause of the headache will=
disappear.
Simple stuff. After you learn the theory that is. I mean this seriously,
the people I teach invent things like this all the time. Because once you
have the theory, the techniques which people can invent are easy.
You come along - have your own theory which you have not explained - and
mock us because we do not know your theory.
It does not make you superior to me - nor do I sit and pant after your
exclusive knowledge.
I figure, if the most high wanted to show me, he would show me himself or
send someone to explain things to me. If you do not explain things to me
... it is actually not because you are superior, but rather that you fail
to do the will of the most high in explaining your insight to others.
Your failure to do the will of G_d does not imply that the most high is
thwarted ... either he will send someone else or he will allow me not to
learn what he wants to teach me.
I am not impressed by the fact you have knowledge I have not. =A0I have
knowledge you have not got.
Big deal.
If you wish to teach me - fine. Teach me.
If you just want to gloat and say you have superior knowledge - I am hardl=
y
interested.
I can and do follow my own way to the most high ... directly from personal=
experience ... and from the wise who are acknowledged with superior
knowledge.
And ... the real issue - I test EVERYTHING.
If this is from the most high - the outcome in your life is humility and
wonder and love. If you lack these things - it is not from the most high.
That is a simple test, not the only one.
What is the outcome of your superior knowledge?
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is=
wrong, and reality is Never wrong.
Mordecai,
Did you ever try acupressure as well? It really works to do everything
it claims. (I've used it for allergy symptoms, back pain, and
tension.) It is great and very quick for relieving muscular tension
and pain. I used it on myself when I had back problems due to an
abdominal tumor pressing on my spine (that the doctors couldn't find
for a dozen years).
A good book on its techniques applicable to a wide variety of ailments
is 'Accupressure's Potent Points - A Guide to Self-Care for Common
Ailments by Michael Reed Gach.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mordecai mldavisplease dont" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
29 Jan 2008 07:24:05 AM |
|
|
Linda Lee wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:16 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. What does that spell, boys and
girls? What about He Resh Ayin? What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. Flashback to the Garden. Get it? Do
you understand all now? You should. I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. kali kundalini = mary magdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Let me translate to something real simple - I used to be 25% permanently
disabled due to car accidents. The problem was balance.
You can prove this because soft tissue damage in the neck and back does not
effect the legs and feet.
Now do you understand?
You see - whilst all the above is true, and whilst I used to be 25%
permanently disabled, and I am not permanently disabled any more (which is
not quite impossible but a serious anomaly in medical literature) the
explanation above does not allow anyone else to get well from back
problems.
With a more involved theory such as "the purpose of the body is to balance
upright" and "the balance is dynamic" and "injury results in locking up
injured areas to prevent further damage" and "if the injury does not heal
quickly, the body adapts and learns to balance without using the effected
area" and "the way to recovery is to remove the defences which prevent a
vertebrae or a movement to occur ... and relearning how to use your body
without the adaptation to an injury" ... then and only then have you an
outline of a more involved theory.
A further expansion into balance muscles, enabling muscles, the way the
brain learns ... biofeedback ... and you have a rough outline.
Now add in self massage techniques and the way to learn biofeedback and a
person is then and only then able to comprehend the way to recover from
injuries.
You can create easily methods to fix otherwise incomprehensible problems.
For example, someone complained of a headache. I looked and the head was
slightly forward and slightly off-center ... so I invented a methodology
for her on the spot. "Bend your head forward until you are comfortable ....
ok now move your head slightly to the left until you feel comfortable
again. Now tighten your neck in this position. Good ... now put your finger
on your forehead and push back, holding your neck tight. Excellent ... now
keeping your head tight - rotate your shoulders and relax the shoulder
blades. Excellent. Relax the neck now."
The head is now in a different position WRT the neck, different muscles are
now required to hold the neck in place. The original muscles which are
tightening the head itself can relax ...and the cause of the headache will
disappear.
Simple stuff. After you learn the theory that is. I mean this seriously,
the people I teach invent things like this all the time. Because once you
have the theory, the techniques which people can invent are easy.
You come along - have your own theory which you have not explained - and
mock us because we do not know your theory.
It does not make you superior to me - nor do I sit and pant after your
exclusive knowledge.
I figure, if the most high wanted to show me, he would show me himself or
send someone to explain things to me. If you do not explain things to me
... it is actually not because you are superior, but rather that you fail
to do the will of the most high in explaining your insight to others.
Your failure to do the will of G_d does not imply that the most high is
thwarted ... either he will send someone else or he will allow me not to
learn what he wants to teach me.
I am not impressed by the fact you have knowledge I have not. I have
knowledge you have not got.
Big deal.
If you wish to teach me - fine. Teach me.
If you just want to gloat and say you have superior knowledge - I am hardly
interested.
I can and do follow my own way to the most high ... directly from personal
experience ... and from the wise who are acknowledged with superior
knowledge.
And ... the real issue - I test EVERYTHING.
If this is from the most high - the outcome in your life is humility and
wonder and love. If you lack these things - it is not from the most high.
That is a simple test, not the only one.
What is the outcome of your superior knowledge?
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is
wrong, and reality is Never wrong.
Mordecai,
Did you ever try acupressure as well? It really works to do everything
it claims. (I've used it for allergy symptoms, back pain, and
tension.) It is great and very quick for relieving muscular tension
and pain. I used it on myself when I had back problems due to an
abdominal tumor pressing on my spine (that the doctors couldn't find
for a dozen years).
A good book on its techniques applicable to a wide variety of ailments
is 'Accupressure's Potent Points - A Guide to Self-Care for Common
Ailments by Michael Reed Gach.
Sure ...
However like all the alternatives ...none restore a human from 25% permanently
disabled ...
Except mine.
I had to develop a model of the spine which explained what its goal was - how it
worked ... and how to use it to get well.
It includes and encourages the use of the gentle exercises - walking, swimming,
yoga, Tai chi.
It includes the use of massage, accupressure, biofeedback.
It includes the physiotherapy routes.
It includes chiropractors ...
The problem with all these many and varied treatment is that when someone is in
pain - they treat the pain.
Which is very useful whilst you are in pain ...
They stabilize you in a pattern which has "already" adapted to your many
injuries.
After all, this is their goal - to stop the pain and to prevent deterioration.
However, if your goal is to change the way you balance in such a way as to cause
you to relax and to straighten, then just treating the pain ... or "hoping" that
something will work is just not enough.
"Permanent disability" is a doctor standing before a court of law and swearing
under oath that the patient will deteriorate, lose functionality and it will
never recover.
And the doctors were correct - what they predicted, occurred.
It just was not as permanent as they predicted.
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is wrong,
and reality is Never wrong.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
29 Jan 2008 07:31:22 AM |
|
|
On Jan 29, 5:24=A0am, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
Linda Lee wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:16 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. =A0What does that spell, boys a=
nd
girls? =A0What about He Resh Ayin? =A0What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. =A0Flashback to the Garden. =A0Get i=
t? =A0Do
you understand all now? =A0You should. =A0I have explained it all.=
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: =A0shakti tattva, sh=
iva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. =A0kali kundalini =3D mary magdal=
ene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. =A0now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Let me translate to something real simple - I used to be 25% permanent=
ly
disabled due to car accidents. The problem was balance.
You can prove this because soft tissue damage in the neck and back doe=
s not
effect the legs and feet.
Now do you understand?
You see - whilst all the above is true, and whilst I used to be 25%
permanently disabled, and I am not permanently disabled any more (whic=
h is
not quite impossible but a serious anomaly in medical literature) the
explanation above does not allow anyone else to get well from back
problems.
With a more involved theory such as "the purpose of the body is to bal=
ance
upright" and "the balance is dynamic" and "injury =A0results in lockin=
g up
injured areas to prevent further damage" and "if the injury does not h=
eal
quickly, the body adapts and learns to balance without using the effec=
ted
area" and "the way to recovery is to remove the defences which prevent=
a
vertebrae or a movement to occur ... and relearning how to use your bo=
dy
without the adaptation to an injury" ... then and only then have you a=
n
outline =A0of a more involved theory.
A further expansion into balance muscles, enabling muscles, the way th=
e
brain learns ... biofeedback ... and you have a rough outline.
Now add in self massage techniques and the way to learn biofeedback an=
d a
person is then and only then able =A0to comprehend the way to recover =
from
injuries.
You can create easily methods to fix otherwise incomprehensible proble=
ms.
For example, someone complained of a headache. I looked and the head w=
as
slightly forward and slightly off-center ... so I invented a methodolo=
gy
for her on the spot. "Bend your head forward until you are comfortable=
....
ok now move your head slightly to the left until you feel comfortable
again. Now tighten your neck in this position. Good ... now put your f=
inger
on your forehead and push back, holding your neck tight. Excellent ...=
now
keeping your head tight - rotate your shoulders and relax the shoulder=
blades. Excellent. Relax the neck now."
The head is now in a different position WRT the neck, different muscle=
s are
now required to hold the neck in place. The original muscles which are=
tightening the head itself can relax ...and the cause of the headache =
will
disappear.
Simple stuff. After you learn the theory that is. I mean this seriousl=
y,
the people I teach invent things like this all the time. Because once =
you
have the theory, the techniques which people can invent are easy.
You come along - have your own theory which you have not explained - a=
nd
mock us because we do not know your theory.
It does not make you superior to me - nor do I sit and pant after your=
exclusive knowledge.
I figure, if the most high wanted to show me, he would show me himself=
or
send someone to explain things to me. If you do not explain things to =
me
... it is actually not because you are superior, but rather that you f=
ail
to do the will of the most high in explaining your insight to others.
Your failure to do the will of G_d does not imply that the most high i=
s
thwarted ... either he will send someone else or he will allow me not =
to
learn what he wants to teach me.
I am not impressed by the fact you have knowledge I have not. =A0I hav=
e
knowledge you have not got.
Big deal.
If you wish to teach me - fine. Teach me.
If you just want to gloat and say you have superior knowledge - I am h=
ardly
interested.
I can and do follow my own way to the most high ... directly from pers=
onal
experience ... and from the wise who are acknowledged with superior
knowledge.
And ... the real issue - I test EVERYTHING.
If this is from the most high - the outcome in your life is humility a=
nd
wonder and love. If you lack these things - it is not from the most hi=
gh.
That is a simple test, not the only one.
What is the outcome of your superior knowledge?
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or realit=
y is
wrong, and reality is Never wrong.
Mordecai,
Did you ever try acupressure as well? It really works to do everything
it claims. (I've used it for allergy symptoms, back pain, and
tension.) It is great and very quick for relieving muscular tension
and pain. I used it on myself when I had back problems due to an
abdominal tumor pressing on my spine (that the doctors couldn't find
for a dozen years).
A good book on its techniques applicable to a wide variety of ailments
is 'Accupressure's Potent Points - A Guide to Self-Care for Common
Ailments by Michael Reed Gach.
Sure ...
However like all the alternatives ...none restore a human from 25% permane=
ntly
disabled ...
Except mine.
I had to develop a model of the spine which explained what its goal was - =
how it
worked ... and how to use it to get well.
It includes and encourages the use of the gentle exercises - walking, swim=
ming,
yoga, Tai chi.
It includes the use of massage, accupressure, biofeedback.
It includes the physiotherapy routes.
It includes chiropractors ...
The problem with all these many and varied treatment is that when someone =
is in
pain - they treat the pain.
Which is very useful whilst you are in pain ...
They stabilize you in a pattern which has "already" adapted to your many
injuries.
After all, =A0this is their goal - to stop the pain and to prevent deterio=
ration.
However, if your goal is to change the way you balance in such a way as to=
cause
you to relax and to straighten, then just treating the pain ... or "hoping=
" that
something will work is just not enough.
"Permanent disability" is a doctor standing before a court of law and swea=
ring
under oath that the patient will deteriorate, lose functionality and it wi=
ll
never recover.
And the doctors were correct - what they predicted, occurred.
It just was not as permanent as they predicted.
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is=
wrong,
and reality is Never wrong.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I have laid out the entire spiritual path before you in just a few
words, Mordecai. I have shown you what Moses did not know, and even
Zagzagel, his teacher, did not know. What more do you want? I have
explained HaShem to you. I have explained His bizarre behavior. I
have explained why you were wrong to reject Jesus in terms entirely
Jewish. Even though you believe me not to be a Jew, I have revealed
to you my Jewishness. And still you complain. Why, Mordecai, why?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mordecai mldavisplease dont" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
29 Jan 2008 08:47:36 AM |
|
|
wrote:
On Jan 29, 5:24 am, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
Linda Lee wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:16 pm, Mordecai <"mldavis(please dont
spam)"@internode.on.net> wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. What does that spell, boys and
girls? What about He Resh Ayin? What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. Flashback to the Garden. Get it? Do
you understand all now? You should. I have explained it all.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. kali kundalini = mary magdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Nope ...
Let me translate to something real simple - I used to be 25% permanently
disabled due to car accidents. The problem was balance.
You can prove this because soft tissue damage in the neck and back does not
effect the legs and feet.
Now do you understand?
You see - whilst all the above is true, and whilst I used to be 25%
permanently disabled, and I am not permanently disabled any more (which is
not quite impossible but a serious anomaly in medical literature) the
explanation above does not allow anyone else to get well from back
problems.
With a more involved theory such as "the purpose of the body is to balance
upright" and "the balance is dynamic" and "injury results in locking up
injured areas to prevent further damage" and "if the injury does not heal
quickly, the body adapts and learns to balance without using the effected
area" and "the way to recovery is to remove the defences which prevent a
vertebrae or a movement to occur ... and relearning how to use your body
without the adaptation to an injury" ... then and only then have you an
outline of a more involved theory.
A further expansion into balance muscles, enabling muscles, the way the
brain learns ... biofeedback ... and you have a rough outline.
Now add in self massage techniques and the way to learn biofeedback and a
person is then and only then able to comprehend the way to recover from
injuries.
You can create easily methods to fix otherwise incomprehensible problems.
For example, someone complained of a headache. I looked and the head was
slightly forward and slightly off-center ... so I invented a methodology
for her on the spot. "Bend your head forward until you are comfortable ....
ok now move your head slightly to the left until you feel comfortable
again. Now tighten your neck in this position. Good ... now put your finger
on your forehead and push back, holding your neck tight. Excellent ... now
keeping your head tight - rotate your shoulders and relax the shoulder
blades. Excellent. Relax the neck now."
The head is now in a different position WRT the neck, different muscles are
now required to hold the neck in place. The original muscles which are
tightening the head itself can relax ...and the cause of the headache will
disappear.
Simple stuff. After you learn the theory that is. I mean this seriously,
the people I teach invent things like this all the time. Because once you
have the theory, the techniques which people can invent are easy.
You come along - have your own theory which you have not explained - and
mock us because we do not know your theory.
It does not make you superior to me - nor do I sit and pant after your
exclusive knowledge.
I figure, if the most high wanted to show me, he would show me himself or
send someone to explain things to me. If you do not explain things to me
... it is actually not because you are superior, but rather that you fail
to do the will of the most high in explaining your insight to others.
Your failure to do the will of G_d does not imply that the most high is
thwarted ... either he will send someone else or he will allow me not to
learn what he wants to teach me.
I am not impressed by the fact you have knowledge I have not. I have
knowledge you have not got.
Big deal.
If you wish to teach me - fine. Teach me.
If you just want to gloat and say you have superior knowledge - I am hardly
interested.
I can and do follow my own way to the most high ... directly from personal
experience ... and from the wise who are acknowledged with superior
knowledge.
And ... the real issue - I test EVERYTHING.
If this is from the most high - the outcome in your life is humility and
wonder and love. If you lack these things - it is not from the most high.
That is a simple test, not the only one.
What is the outcome of your superior knowledge?
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is
wrong, and reality is Never wrong.
Mordecai,
Did you ever try acupressure as well? It really works to do everything
it claims. (I've used it for allergy symptoms, back pain, and
tension.) It is great and very quick for relieving muscular tension
and pain. I used it on myself when I had back problems due to an
abdominal tumor pressing on my spine (that the doctors couldn't find
for a dozen years).
A good book on its techniques applicable to a wide variety of ailments
is 'Accupressure's Potent Points - A Guide to Self-Care for Common
Ailments by Michael Reed Gach.
Sure ...
However like all the alternatives ...none restore a human from 25% permanently
disabled ...
Except mine.
I had to develop a model of the spine which explained what its goal was - how it
worked ... and how to use it to get well.
It includes and encourages the use of the gentle exercises - walking, swimming,
yoga, Tai chi.
It includes the use of massage, accupressure, biofeedback.
It includes the physiotherapy routes.
It includes chiropractors ...
The problem with all these many and varied treatment is that when someone is in
pain - they treat the pain.
Which is very useful whilst you are in pain ...
They stabilize you in a pattern which has "already" adapted to your many
injuries.
After all, this is their goal - to stop the pain and to prevent deterioration.
However, if your goal is to change the way you balance in such a way as to cause
you to relax and to straighten, then just treating the pain ... or "hoping" that
something will work is just not enough.
"Permanent disability" is a doctor standing before a court of law and swearing
under oath that the patient will deteriorate, lose functionality and it will
never recover.
And the doctors were correct - what they predicted, occurred.
It just was not as permanent as they predicted.
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is wrong,
and reality is Never wrong.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I have laid out the entire spiritual path before you in just a few
words, Mordecai. I have shown you what Moses did not know, and even
Zagzagel, his teacher, did not know. What more do you want? I have
explained HaShem to you. I have explained His bizarre behavior. I
have explained why you were wrong to reject Jesus in terms entirely
Jewish. Even though you believe me not to be a Jew, I have revealed
to you my Jewishness. And still you complain. Why, Mordecai, why?
When Israel split away a prophet was sent ... with instructions not to eat or drink ...
to enter Israel one way and to leave another ... and to give the king of israel a
message.
The prophet went ... and gave the king the message and was returning.
Another prophet heard of the first and went out to meet him and invited him back with
him to eat and drink.
The first prophet said no and explained ...
The second prophet said "I also am a prophet - it is OK to come and eat and drink" but
he lied.
After the meal, the second prophet pronounced a sentence on the first prophet whom he
lied to - and it was a death sentence. And it was carried out.
You are not allowed to give up your own vision on the advise of another - not even
another prophet.
Even if you are deceived ...
I might not be a prophet but it is immoral in Judaism, and in the NT for that matter -
to forsake your own beliefs.
You have spoken great evil. And it does not matter if you are correct or not - you
still have spoken GREAT evil.
I follow hashem - not you. If he deceives me - then that is between me and him - and
even if he deceives me, or destroys me, I will still follow him as there is none other
I choose to follow. And none other that I love more than life itself.
I have told you what Hashem has shown me (I presume it was Hashem as I discussed) ...
and asked you to test.
Have you tested?
You can test the vision I have against Tanach and it is perfect.
You can test the same prediction against the NT and it remains perfect.
You can test the vision in the real world and find it matches the real world.
Did you test?
That is the other point - I told you I tested everything.
You have given me nothing that I can test.
You have given me words. I prefer reality.
It is the same with spines, as soon as I say that I have a solution to a problem which
has beset men from the beginning of recorded history ... everyone says "well go to this
or that practitioner/therapy/methodology and they will help."
It does not work.
My methods work.
But whenever I speak ... the reaction is predictable.
Words and reality ...
I prefer reality.
--
Mordecai!
When words and actions disagree, believe actions.
When rhetoric and reality disagree, either rhetoric is wrong or reality is wrong, and
reality is Never wrong.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cactus" |
|
| Title: Re: Take Mensch to the Vet |
28 Jan 2008 07:47:45 PM |
|
|
wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:04 pm, wrote:
The Tet Vet or the He Tet Vav Vet. What does that spell, boys and
girls? What about He Resh Ayin? What does that spell?
Hissssssssssssssssssssssssss. Flashback to the Garden. Get it? Do
you understand all now? You should. I have explained it all.
Tet Vet = tov, good (adj)
He Tet Vav Vet = The good
He Resh Ayin = The evil
So what? You haven't explained anything.
You see, brethren, we preach just three things: shakti tattva, shiva
tattva, and kali kundalini tattva. kali kundalini = mary magdalene.
mary magdalene is the consort of jehoshua moshiach. now do you
understand everything, my friends?
Believe what you will, follow whatever cosmic truth tickles your spirit,
but this is not Jewish. Go enjoy your beliefs and don't worry about it.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|