Religions > Bible > Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"JaBrIoL" |
| Date: |
05 Feb 2004 09:59:16 AM |
| Object: |
Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 — The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers. The study, published in the
Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, is one of the first to
examine the event using oceanography, weather patterns, and
mathematical calculations. Naum Volzinger, senior researcher at the
St. Petersburg Institute of Oceanology, and colleague Alexei Androsov
of Hamburg, determined that a reef runs from Egypt to the north side
of the Red Sea. They believe the reef used to be much closer to the
surface during Biblical times at approximately 1500 B.C. Depending on
the weather and tidal movements, the reef could have been exposed for
hours at a time, according to the new theory. "If the wind blew all
night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second, then the
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times. "It would take
the Jews — there were 600,000 of them — four hours to cross the
seven-kilometer (4.4 mile) reef that runs from one coast to another.
Then, in half an hour, the waters would come back." The theory
provides a scientific explanation for the story of the Red Sea
parting, which is credited to Moses and Jehovah in the Bible. "And
Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and Jehovah caused the sea
to go back by a strong east wind all the night, and made the sea dry
land, and the waters were divided. And the children of Israel went
into the midst of the sea upon the dry ground: and the waters were a
wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left." (Exodus
14:21-22). Discovery News contacted three Biblical scholars about the
Russian study, and each expressed disappointment with the findings.
Robert Coote, professor of Old Testament studies at the San Francisco
Theological Seminary, said the language used to write the book of
Exodus, Hebrew Yam Sup, can be interpreted in different ways. Coote
indicated that the "Red Sea" might actually have been the
Mediterranean, a Suez lagoon, the Gulf of Suez, or the Gulf of Aqaba.
Aaron Brody, assistant professor of Bible and archaeology and director
of the Bade Museum at the Pacific School of Religion, agreed with
Coote and added, "There are no extra-biblical historic texts that
pertain to the Exodus story, and short-term events like the one
described in the Book of Exodus very rarely appear in the
archaeological record, so we have no textual sources outside of the
material in Genesis and no artifactual data to clarify this event."
Along with Coote and Brody, Barbara Green, professor of Biblical
studies at the Dominican School of Philosophy and Theology, believes
history and science provide important tools for studying the Bible,
but that they should not be the only ones. "The Bible needs to be read
with many lenses, among which are history and science, but there are
many others as well," Green told Discovery News. "The error is to
assume that all that is at stake is facticity — how many miles, how
much speed. It is ludicrous on its own."
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20040202/redsea.html
If you notice some of the opposing scientist reply, you will see tha
on in aprticluar is about as clueless about the bible as a creationist
is clueless about scince. Of course Carol, who loves to read
everything post that I write is clueless about everything I write
regardless.
.
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
05 Feb 2004 11:05:44 AM |
|
|
"JaBrIoL" <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote in message
news:d222de3e.0402050759.3bc184b3@posting.google.com...
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 - The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers.
Great, so no god necessary then?
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible -- WITHOUT ANY"GOD"! |
05 Feb 2004 06:57:15 PM |
|
|
Denis Loubet wrote:
"JaBrIoL" <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote in message
news:d222de3e.0402050759.3bc184b3@posting.google.com...
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 - The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers.
Great, so no god necessary then?
===>"God" (and "God did it")
has always been just a convenient, ready-made "explanation"
of strange or not-well-understood events, by people who
don't trust Nature as the actor behind such events.-- L.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Denis Loubet" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible -- WITHOUT ANY "GOD"! |
05 Feb 2004 09:00:01 PM |
|
|
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:4022E66B.677AD07F@Nothing_But_The.Truth...
Denis Loubet wrote:
"JaBrIoL" <Jabriol@excite.com> wrote in message
news:d222de3e.0402050759.3bc184b3@posting.google.com...
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 - The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers.
Great, so no god necessary then?
===>"God" (and "God did it")
has always been just a convenient, ready-made "explanation"
of strange or not-well-understood events, by people who
don't trust Nature as the actor behind such events.-- L.
What I find amusing is that he's trying to provide a naturalistic
explanation for the parting of the red sea, completely unaware that such an
explanation removes his god from the picture. Duhhh!
Denis Loubet
dloubet@io.com
http://www.io.com/~dloubet
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Braidwood" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
07 Feb 2004 09:55:43 AM |
|
|
(JaBrIoL) wrote in message news:<d222de3e.0402050759.3bc184b3@posting.google.com>...
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 ? The parting of the Red Sea...
<SNIP>...I write is clueless about everything I write regardless.
Oh Jabbers, you are a fool:
1. Have you ever tried to walk on an exposed coral reef? That stuff is
_very_ sharp and _very_ uneven. Whatsmore, depending on the species,
some of it is very brittle. It wouldn't suppport hundereds of
thousands of people tramping across it.
2. Exposure to the air and the high winds postulated would have killed
the coral polyps, destroying the reef. As per usual, biology makes a
mockery of biblical apology.
3. None of the pyramids, temples or the tombs of ancient Egypt were
built using slave labour. It is not just that there is no evidence of
Jewish slaves in Egypt, but that we have direct and documentary
evidence that the Egyptians did the building themselves.
4. In all Egyptian history, there is only one mention of Isreal -
during the reign of King Murneptah and he was buried in the Valley of
the Kings; not at the bottom of the Red Sea. I have been in his tomb.
5. If the events in Exodus had actually happened as described, it
would have had a devastating affect on ancient Egyptian religion - in
much the same way as gunpowder has done for so many tribal beliefs in
more recent times. Yet the Egyptian pantheon continued to thrive until
very nearly 1600 years after Merneptah's demise.
Face it Jabbers, Exodus is a complete myth. There is no corroborative
evidence at all and there should be; especially if your god had given
the Egyptians the severe drubbing claimed.
The Bible just isn't true.
(-: Ian :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
07 Feb 2004 02:08:14 PM |
|
|
so.. you simply don't accept some scientific data.
not the first time.. but let me reply to a few of your
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0402070755.2acd1cd0@posting.google.com...
Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) wrote in message
news:<d222de3e.0402050759.3bc184b3@posting.google.com>...
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 ? The parting of the Red Sea...
<SNIP>...I write is clueless about everything I write regardless.
Oh Jabbers, you are a fool:
1. Have you ever tried to walk on an exposed coral reef? That stuff is
_very_ sharp and _very_ uneven. Whatsmore, depending on the species,
some of it is very brittle. It wouldn't suppport hundereds of
thousands of people tramping across it.
well, I have walk on coral.. are you saying that the israelite were all
walking barefooted?
2. Exposure to the air and the high winds postulated would have killed
the coral polyps, destroying the reef. As per usual, biology makes a
mockery of biblical apology.
maybe they were destroyed...
3. None of the pyramids, temples or the tombs of ancient Egypt were
built using slave labour. It is not just that there is no evidence of
Jewish slaves in Egypt, but that we have direct and documentary
evidence that the Egyptians did the building themselves.
who said that the hebrew sole job was building pyramids... as I read they
were building many different things.. and there is documents that eyptians
use slave for various things..
4. In all Egyptian history, there is only one mention of Isreal -
during the reign of King Murneptah and he was buried in the Valley of
the Kings; not at the bottom of the Red Sea. I have been in his tomb.
You also forget about how eygptian history is writen and re written. they
had a nasty habit of not writing anything that would embarras them... and
that is documented as well.
5. If the events in Exodus had actually happened as described, it
would have had a devastating affect on ancient Egyptian religion - in
much the same way as gunpowder has done for so many tribal beliefs in
more recent times. Yet the Egyptian pantheon continued to thrive until
very nearly 1600 years after Merneptah's demise.
see my reply above.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ian Braidwood" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
09 Feb 2004 01:12:18 PM |
|
|
"jabriol" <jabriol@borijan.org> wrote in message news:<OAbVb.6800621$be.1123866@news.easynews.com>...
so.. you simply don't accept some scientific data.
not the first time.. but let me reply to a few of your
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0402070755.2acd1cd0@posting.google.com...
Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) wrote in message
news:<d222de3e.0402050759.3bc184b3@posting.google.com>...
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 ? The parting of the Red Sea...
<SNIP>...I write is clueless about everything I write regardless.
Oh Jabbers, you are a fool:
1. Have you ever tried to walk on an exposed coral reef? That stuff is
_very_ sharp and _very_ uneven. Whatsmore, depending on the species,
some of it is very brittle. It wouldn't suppport hundereds of
thousands of people tramping across it.
well, I have walk on coral.. are you saying that the israelite were all
walking barefooted?
I'm not talking about nice, partially erroded coral, but _fresh_
coral, which is uneven and brittle. You would need an unbroken line of
coral several miles long.
No, I'm not suggesting that the Isrealites went barefoot. However, the
sort of shoes useful for wear in Egyptian towns would not stand up to
that kind of punishment and neither would the coral. Perhaps God
isssued them with modern British Army boots?
2. Exposure to the air and the high winds postulated would have killed
the coral polyps, destroying the reef. As per usual, biology makes a
mockery of biblical apology.
maybe they were destroyed...
They wouldn't even last long enough for the crossing. Remember these
are structures grown in water, they'd have to be strong enough to take
the weight of all those people whilst denied the natural support of
bouyancy.
3. None of the pyramids, temples or the tombs of ancient Egypt were
built using slave labour. It is not just that there is no evidence of
Jewish slaves in Egypt, but that we have direct and documentary
evidence that the Egyptians did the building themselves.
who said that the hebrew sole job was building pyramids... as I read they
were building many different things.. and there is documents that eyptians
use slave for various things..
Oh yes, Egyptians did use slave labour, but not for sacred work and
there is no evidence of Jewish slaves in Egypt. There should be.
4. In all Egyptian history, there is only one mention of Isreal -
during the reign of King Murneptah and he was buried in the Valley of
the Kings; not at the bottom of the Red Sea. I have been in his tomb.
You also forget about how eygptian history is writen and re written. they
had a nasty habit of not writing anything that would embarras them... and
that is documented as well.
How do we know that the Egyptians rewrote history? Because there was
contradictory evidence, which in this case is lacking.
Even if the Egyptians had tried to expunge exodus from their records,
they wouldn't have been able to delete records locked away in the
tombs of their people, including the hypothetical king who first
conquered the Jews. We should have this evidence, but it is missing
from a remarkably complete record. The Egyptians _loved_ to boast
about there conquests, even you can't deny that.
In this case, absence of evidence _is_ evidence of absence.
5. If the events in Exodus had actually happened as described, it
would have had a devastating affect on ancient Egyptian religion - in
much the same way as gunpowder has done for so many tribal beliefs in
more recent times. Yet the Egyptian pantheon continued to thrive until
very nearly 1600 years after Merneptah's demise.
see my reply above.
I don't think your reply addresses this question at all. After all,
the collapse of Egyptian religion would have been catastrophic -
within one or two generations at most. Yet Egyptian religion was so
strong that when the Greeks conquered Egypt, they built temples
dedictaed to Egyptian gods like Horus.
Sorry Jabbers, but there is nothing to corroborate Exodus as anything
more than a tale of Isrealite conceit.
(-: Ian :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Marc Levenson" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By JenniferViegas, Discovery News |
09 Feb 2004 11:23:37 PM |
|
|
Could you participants in this thread please remove the other newsgroups that are not interested in what
appears to be a theological conversation? I don't see how rec.aquaria.marine.reefs would be interested.
and have removed it from the addresses addressed above, before sending my reply.
Thanks.
Ian Braidwood wrote:
"jabriol" <jabriol@borijan.org> wrote in message news:<OAbVb.6800621$be.1123866@news.easynews.com>...
so.. you simply don't accept some scientific data.
not the first time.. but let me reply to a few of your
"Ian Braidwood" <diri.gini@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:53ad390d.0402070755.2acd1cd0@posting.google.com...
Jabriol@excite.com (JaBrIoL) wrote in message
news:<d222de3e.0402050759.3bc184b3@posting.google.com>...
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 ? The parting of the Red Sea...
<SNIP>...I write is clueless about everything I write regardless.
Oh Jabbers, you are a fool:
1. Have you ever tried to walk on an exposed coral reef? That stuff is
_very_ sharp and _very_ uneven. Whatsmore, depending on the species,
some of it is very brittle. It wouldn't suppport hundereds of
thousands of people tramping across it.
well, I have walk on coral.. are you saying that the israelite were all
walking barefooted?
I'm not talking about nice, partially erroded coral, but _fresh_
coral, which is uneven and brittle. You would need an unbroken line of
coral several miles long.
No, I'm not suggesting that the Isrealites went barefoot. However, the
sort of shoes useful for wear in Egyptian towns would not stand up to
that kind of punishment and neither would the coral. Perhaps God
isssued them with modern British Army boots?
2. Exposure to the air and the high winds postulated would have killed
the coral polyps, destroying the reef. As per usual, biology makes a
mockery of biblical apology.
maybe they were destroyed...
They wouldn't even last long enough for the crossing. Remember these
are structures grown in water, they'd have to be strong enough to take
the weight of all those people whilst denied the natural support of
bouyancy.
3. None of the pyramids, temples or the tombs of ancient Egypt were
built using slave labour. It is not just that there is no evidence of
Jewish slaves in Egypt, but that we have direct and documentary
evidence that the Egyptians did the building themselves.
who said that the hebrew sole job was building pyramids... as I read they
were building many different things.. and there is documents that eyptians
use slave for various things..
Oh yes, Egyptians did use slave labour, but not for sacred work and
there is no evidence of Jewish slaves in Egypt. There should be.
4. In all Egyptian history, there is only one mention of Isreal -
during the reign of King Murneptah and he was buried in the Valley of
the Kings; not at the bottom of the Red Sea. I have been in his tomb.
You also forget about how eygptian history is writen and re written. they
had a nasty habit of not writing anything that would embarras them... and
that is documented as well.
How do we know that the Egyptians rewrote history? Because there was
contradictory evidence, which in this case is lacking.
Even if the Egyptians had tried to expunge exodus from their records,
they wouldn't have been able to delete records locked away in the
tombs of their people, including the hypothetical king who first
conquered the Jews. We should have this evidence, but it is missing
from a remarkably complete record. The Egyptians _loved_ to boast
about there conquests, even you can't deny that.
In this case, absence of evidence _is_ evidence of absence.
5. If the events in Exodus had actually happened as described, it
would have had a devastating affect on ancient Egyptian religion - in
much the same way as gunpowder has done for so many tribal beliefs in
more recent times. Yet the Egyptian pantheon continued to thrive until
very nearly 1600 years after Merneptah's demise.
see my reply above.
I don't think your reply addresses this question at all. After all,
the collapse of Egyptian religion would have been catastrophic -
within one or two generations at most. Yet Egyptian religion was so
strong that when the Greeks conquered Egypt, they built temples
dedictaed to Egyptian gods like Horus.
Sorry Jabbers, but there is nothing to corroborate Exodus as anything
more than a tale of Isrealite conceit.
(-: Ian :-)
--
Personal Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com/oanda/index.html
Business Page: http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com
Marine Hobbyist: http://www.melevsreef.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By JenniferViegas, Discovery News |
05 Feb 2004 06:52:39 PM |
|
|
JaBrIoL wrote:
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 — The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers.
===>It only shows that such an event MAY BE POSSIBLE,
not that it actually happened in reality!
According to the latest archaeological finds*, there is ZERO evidence
of any large group having left Egypt and dwelled in the desert for
40 years.
Moses is just a character is a story.
"Most of the Bible is found to be legend
or propaganda favoring that party or its agenda.
The Israelites did not come from somewhere else,
neither Ur nor Egypt,
but are the same people who had been living there
for millennia, not much different from any of their neighbors,
like the Canaanites.
This is pretty much accepted as fact by most experts."
(Neil Asher Silberman)
*See: "THE BIBLE UNEARTHED:
Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel
and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts" by
Israel Finkelstein, Neil Asher Silberman
Libertarius
===========
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
05 Feb 2004 08:36:34 PM |
|
|
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> wrote in message
news:4022E557.40B300C4@Nothing_But_The.Truth...
JaBrIoL wrote:
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 - The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers.
===>It only shows that such an event MAY BE POSSIBLE,
not that it actually happened in reality!
same can be said about evolution.
According to the latest archaeological finds*, there is ZERO evidence
of any large group having left Egypt and dwelled in the desert for
40 years.
which latest finds..? got any facts about clain that can be eaisly reviewed?
Moses is just a character is a story.
evidence?
"Most of the Bible is found to be legend
or propaganda favoring that party or its agenda.
which party... republican or democrats?
The Israelites did not come from somewhere else,
neither Ur nor Egypt,
but are the same people who had been living there
for millennia, not much different from any of their neighbors,
like the Canaanites.
This is pretty much accepted as fact by most experts."
(Neil Asher Silberman)
evidence?
*See: "THE BIBLE UNEARTHED:
Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel
and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts" by
Israel Finkelstein, Neil Asher Silberman
Libertarius
===========
just one book ... is it peered review?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
05 Feb 2004 11:08:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:52:39 -0700, Libertarius
<Libertarius@Nothing_But_The.Truth> posted in alt.atheism:
The Israelites did not come from somewhere else,
neither Ur nor Egypt,
but are the same people who had been living there
for millennia, not much different from any of their neighbors,
like the Canaanites.
This is pretty much accepted as fact by most experts."
(Neil Asher Silberman)
What's accepted by a lot of experts is that the Israelites WERE the
Canaanites.
--
"I don't try to imagine a God; it suffices to stand in awe of the structure of the world
insofar as it allows our inadequate senses to appreciate it."
- Letter to S. Flesch, April 16, 1954; Einstein Archive 30-1154
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Davidson" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By JenniferViegas, Discovery News |
05 Feb 2004 10:21:39 PM |
|
|
JaBrIoL wrote:
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 — The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers. ...
So the Bible is literally accurate in describing the parting of the Red
[Reed] Sea, but wrong when it says God did it?
--
Kevin
My articles on religion at http://kevin.davnet.org/articles/
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 06:23:14 PM |
|
|
"Kevin Davidson" <Harvested_kevin@davnet.org> wrote in message
news:10265ii2vfqj2bb@corp.supernews.com...
JaBrIoL wrote:
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 — The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers. ...
So the Bible is literally accurate in describing the parting of the Red
[Reed] Sea, but wrong when it says God did it?
--
I don't think the article was refuting a god.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Davidson" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By JenniferViegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 06:31:06 PM |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
"Kevin Davidson" <Harvested_kevin@davnet.org> wrote in message
news:10265ii2vfqj2bb@corp.supernews.com...
JaBrIoL wrote:
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 — The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers. ...
So the Bible is literally accurate in describing the parting of the Red
[Reed] Sea, but wrong when it says God did it?
--
I don't think the article was refuting a god.
Nor I. I was just pointing out the inherent contradiction in the argument.
--
Kevin
My articles on religion at http://kevin.davnet.org/articles/
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "JaBrIoL" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 02:38:23 PM |
|
|
Kevin Davidson <Harvested_kevin@davnet.org> wrote in message news:<10265ii2vfqj2bb@corp.supernews.com>...
JaBrIoL wrote:
Red Sea Reefs from Space Feb. 2, 2004 ? The parting of the Red Sea and
the subsequent escape of thousands of Jewish slaves, which is
described in the Bible's book of Exodus, can be explained by science,
according to two Russian researchers. ...
So the Bible is literally accurate in describing the parting of the Red
[Reed] Sea, but wrong when it says God did it?
Science.. real science does not account for, or discount a superior
intelligence or action by such.
only lowly educated atheist do...
how would a primative describe a nuclear blast? volcano fart? :-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stranger" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 03:42:28 PM |
|
|
JabTrol wrote:
"Science.. real science does not account for, or discount a superior
intelligence or action by such.
only lowly educated atheist do..."
Got proof of any superior intelligence?
.........
No...? Then dont wast anyone's time over it pls.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 06:30:46 PM |
|
|
"Stranger" <spinner@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:4024087f$0$322$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
JabTrol wrote:
"Science.. real science does not account for, or discount a superior
intelligence or action by such.
only lowly educated atheist do..."
Got proof of any superior intelligence?
........
No...? Then dont wast anyone's time over it pls.
yup low intelligent atheist normally answer thier own questions...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Stranger" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 06:46:34 PM |
|
|
"jabriol" <jabriol@borijan.org> wrote in message
news:WkWUb.7752677$Of.1252694@news.easynews.com...
"Stranger" <spinner@xs4all.nl> wrote in message
news:4024087f$0$322$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
JabTrol wrote:
"Science.. real science does not account for, or discount a superior
intelligence or action by such.
only lowly educated atheist do..."
Got proof of any superior intelligence?
........
No...? Then dont wast anyone's time over it pls.
yup low intelligent atheist normally answer thier own questions...
hehe it doesnt take away you got no proof to back your claim.
It does take low intelligent persons to fall for the dogma's in religoun
though.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
05 Feb 2004 11:07:51 PM |
|
|
On 5 Feb 2004 07:59:16 -0800, (JaBrIoL) posted in
alt.atheism:
"If the wind blew all night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second
That's about 70 MPH. In the middle east? A hurricane with sustained
hurricane winds then never dropped?
Believing in miracles is easier.
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times. "It would take
the Jews — there were 600,000 of them
Plus their wives, an average of probably 4 children each and all their
animals.
— four hours
Times 8? That would be about 32 hours, or a day and a half.
Make that "a major miracle".
--
"Christians, it is needless to say, utterly detest each other. They slander each
other constantly with the vilest forms of abuse and cannot come to any sort of
agreement in their teachings. Each sect brands its own, fills the head of its own
with deceitful nonsense, and makes perfect little pigs of those it wins over to its
side."
- Celsus (2nd century C.E.)
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
| User: "JaBrIoL" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 02:35:29 PM |
|
|
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message news:<d386205f6t0b24ra0kr53l4vof34ntv4bq@Pern.rk>...
On 5 Feb 2004 07:59:16 -0800, (JaBrIoL) posted in
alt.atheism:
"If the wind blew all night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second
That's about 70 MPH. In the middle east? A hurricane with sustained
hurricane winds then never dropped?
Believing in miracles is easier.
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times. "It would take
the Jews ? there were 600,000 of them
golly.. ya just proved yourself to be a mathematical moron. 600,000
would include women and children.
snip.. the rest..... it became bogus when you try to fudge the
numbers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 03:19:22 PM |
|
|
In alt.talk.creationism, (JaBrIoL) wrote in
<d222de3e.0402061235.203a0ea3@posting.google.com>:
Al Klein <rukbat@pern.invalid> wrote in message news:<d386205f6t0b24ra0kr53l4vof34ntv4bq@Pern.rk>...
On 5 Feb 2004 07:59:16 -0800, (JaBrIoL) posted in
alt.atheism:
"If the wind blew all night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second
That's about 70 MPH. In the middle east? A hurricane with sustained
hurricane winds then never dropped?
Believing in miracles is easier.
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times. "It would take
the Jews ? there were 600,000 of them
golly.. ya just proved yourself to be a mathematical moron. 600,000
would include women and children.
No, it would not, see below.
snip.. the rest..... it became bogus when you try to fudge the
numbers.
Apparently you cannot even read the Bible.
Numbers 1:
20 From the descendants of Reuben the firstborn son of Israel:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, one by one, according to the records of their clans
and families. 21 The number from the tribe of Reuben was 46,500.
22 From the descendants of Simeon:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were counted and listed by name, one by one, according to the records of
their clans and families. 23 The number from the tribe of Simeon was
59,300.
24 From the descendants of Gad:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 25 The number from the tribe of Gad was 45,650.
26 From the descendants of Judah:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 27 The number from the tribe of Judah was 74,600.
28 From the descendants of Issachar:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 29 The number from the tribe of Issachar was 54,400.
30 From the descendants of Zebulun:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 31 The number from the tribe of Zebulun was 57,400.
32 From the sons of Joseph:
From the descendants of Ephraim:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 33 The number from the tribe of Ephraim was 40,500.
34 From the descendants of Manasseh:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 35 The number from the tribe of Manasseh was 32,200.
36 From the descendants of Benjamin:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 37 The number from the tribe of Benjamin was 35,400.
38 From the descendants of Dan:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 39 The number from the tribe of Dan was 62,700.
40 From the descendants of Asher:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 41 The number from the tribe of Asher was 41,500.
42 From the descendants of Naphtali:
All the men twenty years old or more who were able to serve in the army
were listed by name, according to the records of their clans and
families. 43 The number from the tribe of Naphtali was 53,400.
44 These were the men counted by Moses and Aaron and the twelve leaders
of Israel, each one representing his family. 45 All the Israelites
twenty years old or more who were able to serve in Israel's army were
counted according to their families. 46 The total number was 603,550.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 09:20:50 PM |
|
|
On 6 Feb 2004 12:35:29 -0800, (JaBrIoL) posted in
alt.atheism:
golly.. ya just proved yourself to be a mathematical moron. 600,000
would include women and children.
Not according to your bible.
--
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived."
- Isaac Asimov
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Davidson" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By JenniferViegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 06:11:41 PM |
|
|
Al Klein wrote:
On 5 Feb 2004 07:59:16 -0800, (JaBrIoL) posted in
alt.atheism:
"If the wind blew all night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second
That's about 70 MPH. In the middle east? A hurricane with sustained
hurricane winds then never dropped?
Believing in miracles is easier.
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times. "It would take
the Jews — there were 600,000 of them
Plus their wives, an average of probably 4 children each and all their
animals.
I think these numbers, like many in the Bible, are exaggerated.
....
--
Kevin
My articles on religion at http://kevin.davnet.org/articles/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Klein" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 09:23:05 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 19:11:41 -0500, Kevin Davidson
<Harvested_kevin@davnet.org> posted in alt.atheism:
I think these numbers, like many in the Bible, are exaggerated.
I would call 600,000 an exaggerated number for a couple of men and
their families.
--
"I am a deeply religious nonbeliever.... This is a somewhat new kind of religion."
- Letter to Hans Muehsam March 30, 1954; Einstein Archive 38-434
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
rukbat at optonline dot net
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David Jensen" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
06 Feb 2004 06:22:05 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 19:11:41 -0500, in alt.talk.creationism
Kevin Davidson <Harvested_kevin@davnet.org> wrote in
<1028b9o4vq8bpf7@corp.supernews.com>:
Al Klein wrote:
On 5 Feb 2004 07:59:16 -0800, (JaBrIoL) posted in
alt.atheism:
"If the wind blew all night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second
That's about 70 MPH. In the middle east? A hurricane with sustained
hurricane winds then never dropped?
Believing in miracles is easier.
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times. "It would take
the Jews — there were 600,000 of them
Plus their wives, an average of probably 4 children each and all their
animals.
I think these numbers, like many in the Bible, are exaggerated.
...
As was the actual Exodus.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
11 Feb 2004 12:27:30 AM |
|
|
On 5 Feb 2004 07:59:16 -0800, (JaBrIoL) wrote:
Naum Volzinger, senior researcher at the
St. Petersburg Institute of Oceanology, and colleague Alexei Androsov
of Hamburg, determined that a reef runs from Egypt to the north side
of the Red Sea. ... "If the wind blew all
night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second, then the
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times.
And I bet this professor knows all about drying reef.
98 1/2 feet per second? That's almost 70 mph. That is essentially a
fucking hurricane. Funny the Bible doesn't mention it.
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
| User: "JaBrIoL" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
11 Feb 2004 06:08:52 AM |
|
|
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in message news:<ckij20pm2q2387cd7qhk7sinb4763k3p4e@4ax.com>...
On 5 Feb 2004 07:59:16 -0800, (JaBrIoL) wrote:
Naum Volzinger, senior researcher at the
St. Petersburg Institute of Oceanology, and colleague Alexei Androsov
of Hamburg, determined that a reef runs from Egypt to the north side
of the Red Sea. ... "If the wind blew all
night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second, then the
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times.
And I bet this professor knows all about drying reef.
98 1/2 feet per second? That's almost 70 mph. That is essentially a
fucking hurricane. Funny the Bible doesn't mention it.
actually it does. maybe should read the bible and find out. and 70
miles gust winds are not that bad.
.
|
|
|
| User: "satyr" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
12 Feb 2004 10:39:15 PM |
|
|
On 11 Feb 2004 04:08:52 -0800, (JaBrIoL) wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in message news:<ckij20pm2q2387cd7qhk7sinb4763k3p4e@4ax.com>...
On 5 Feb 2004 07:59:16 -0800, (JaBrIoL) wrote:
Naum Volzinger, senior researcher at the
St. Petersburg Institute of Oceanology, and colleague Alexei Androsov
of Hamburg, determined that a reef runs from Egypt to the north side
of the Red Sea. ... "If the wind blew all
night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second, then the
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times.
And I bet this professor knows all about drying reef.
98 1/2 feet per second? That's almost 70 mph. That is essentially a
fucking hurricane. Funny the Bible doesn't mention it.
actually it does. maybe should read the bible and find out. and 70
miles gust winds are not that bad.
1. 70 mph is a hell of a gust.
2. Blowing "all night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per
second..." is a fucking hurricane, not a gust.
3. The Bible says a "strong east wind." It doesn't say anything
about a fucking hurricane.
Additionally, can the good professor explain how this phenomenon would
cause there to be walls of water on either side of the fleeing
Israelites?
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
| User: "GLEN VARVARO" |
|
| Title: Re: Talk.Origin Banned Subject: Red Sea Parting Possible By Jennifer Viegas, Discovery News |
15 Feb 2004 04:12:01 PM |
|
|
What a great site! Very informative!
"satyr" <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in message
news:l2ko201b3e417coik1inaqlfv0n6nd9obg@4ax.com...
On 11 Feb 2004 04:08:52 -0800, (JaBrIoL) wrote:
satyr <RsEaMtOyVrE@infidels.org> wrote in message
news:<ckij20pm2q2387cd7qhk7sinb4763k3p4e@4ax.com>...
On 5 Feb 2004 07:59:16 -0800, (JaBrIoL) wrote:
Naum Volzinger, senior researcher at the
St. Petersburg Institute of Oceanology, and colleague Alexei Androsov
of Hamburg, determined that a reef runs from Egypt to the north side
of the Red Sea. ... "If the wind blew all
night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per second, then the
reef would be dry," Volzinger told The Moscow Times.
And I bet this professor knows all about drying reef.
98 1/2 feet per second? That's almost 70 mph. That is essentially a
fucking hurricane. Funny the Bible doesn't mention it.
actually it does. maybe should read the bible and find out. and 70
miles gust winds are not that bad.
1. 70 mph is a hell of a gust.
2. Blowing "all night at a speed of 30 meters (about 98 1/2 feet) per
second..." is a fucking hurricane, not a gust.
3. The Bible says a "strong east wind." It doesn't say anything
about a fucking hurricane.
Additionally, can the good professor explain how this phenomenon would
cause there to be walls of water on either side of the fleeing
Israelites?
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|