| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,497 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
| Date: |
17 Dec 2004 12:56:47 PM |
| Object: |
The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:05:24 GMT,
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
[ ... ]
...the unsaved will nash [sic!] their teeth in agony
"left behind."
Well I'm gay, so I guess I get "left behind."
No more so than if you were straight, but stole an apple
off a vendor's cart. According to the Bible, all sins are EQUAL.
And while being gay probably isn't a sin at all, stealing that
apple **would** be, per the Bible. There's a **commandment**
against stealing!
Everyone should keep these points in mind whenever they
WHINE about homosexuality and threaten perdition for it, but
say NOTHING about the lying and other Commandment-
breaking that people engage in constantly, which puts them
in **actual** and verifiable danger of that -- per the Bible that
the bigots claim to believe in.
Homophobes are brainwashed (and mostly brain-DEAD)
bigots and hateful losers who have no socially-redeeming lives.
Sensible and intelligent people would sooner attend a rat fight
that to subscribe to such a mindless and hateful agenda.
The bigots would be upset to hear those truths about them-
selves... IF they even had the sense to *recognize* those as
truths. Unfortunately, most of them are mindless lemmings who
unquestioningly follow their False Teachers' phony and UN-
Biblical dogmas like automatons.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
17 Dec 2004 08:56:15 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,497 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:41c32b88.12697229@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:05:24 GMT,
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
[ ... ]
...the unsaved will nash [sic!] their teeth in agony
"left behind."
Well I'm gay, so I guess I get "left behind."
No more so than if you were straight, but stole an apple
off a vendor's cart. According to the Bible, all sins are EQUAL.
And while being gay probably isn't a sin at all, stealing that
apple **would** be, per the Bible. There's a **commandment**
against stealing!
Everyone should keep these points in mind whenever they
WHINE about homosexuality and threaten perdition for it, but
say NOTHING about the lying and other Commandment-
breaking that people engage in constantly, which puts them
in **actual** and verifiable danger of that -- per the Bible that
the bigots claim to believe in.
Homophobes are brainwashed (and mostly brain-DEAD)
bigots and hateful losers who have no socially-redeeming lives.
Sensible and intelligent people would sooner attend a rat fight
that to subscribe to such a mindless and hateful agenda.
The bigots would be upset to hear those truths about them-
selves... IF they even had the sense to *recognize* those as
truths. Unfortunately, most of them are mindless lemmings who
unquestioningly follow their False Teachers' phony and UN-
Biblical dogmas like automatons.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
You are a real great guy to be speaking about telling the truth. You claim
dozens of things, yet you fail to back up any of them. Hypocrite.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,495 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
17 Dec 2004 09:06:00 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:56:15 -0600,
Cowardly TROLL, "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
[ ... ]
...the unsaved will nash [sic!] their teeth in agony
"left behind."
Well I'm gay, so I guess I get "left behind."
No more so than if you were straight, but stole an apple
off a vendor's cart. According to the Bible, all sins are EQUAL.
And while being gay probably isn't a sin at all, stealing that
apple **would** be, per the Bible. There's a **commandment**
against stealing!
Everyone should keep these points in mind whenever they
WHINE about homosexuality and threaten perdition for it, but
say NOTHING about the lying and other Commandment-
breaking that people engage in constantly, which puts them
in **actual** and verifiable danger of that -- per the Bible that
the bigots claim to believe in.
Homophobes are brainwashed (and mostly brain-DEAD)
bigots and hateful losers who have no socially-redeeming lives.
Sensible and intelligent people would sooner attend a rat fight
that to subscribe to such a mindless and hateful agenda.
The bigots would be upset to hear those truths about them-
selves... IF they even had the sense to *recognize* those as
truths. Unfortunately, most of them are mindless lemmings who
unquestioningly follow their False Teachers' phony and UN-
Biblical dogmas like automatons.
You are a real great guy to be speaking about telling the truth.
You claim dozens of things, yet you fail to back up any of them.
Hypocrite.
ROTFL!!!!! This from an ignorant and bigoted troll who wouldn't
know a relevant fact if he tripped over it. And just continues to
PROVE his abject stupidity to everyone. (No wonder he doesn't
have the guts to sign his name to his posts.)
___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Do not feed the |
/ O O\__ trolls. Thank you. |
/ \ | --Mgt. |
/ \ \|__________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
17 Dec 2004 09:47:28 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,495 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:41c99d0a.4164072@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:56:15 -0600,
Cowardly TROLL, "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
[ ... ]
...the unsaved will nash [sic!] their teeth in agony
"left behind."
Well I'm gay, so I guess I get "left behind."
No more so than if you were straight, but stole an apple
off a vendor's cart. According to the Bible, all sins are EQUAL.
And while being gay probably isn't a sin at all, stealing that
apple **would** be, per the Bible. There's a **commandment**
against stealing!
Everyone should keep these points in mind whenever they
WHINE about homosexuality and threaten perdition for it, but
say NOTHING about the lying and other Commandment-
breaking that people engage in constantly, which puts them
in **actual** and verifiable danger of that -- per the Bible that
the bigots claim to believe in.
Homophobes are brainwashed (and mostly brain-DEAD)
bigots and hateful losers who have no socially-redeeming lives.
Sensible and intelligent people would sooner attend a rat fight
that to subscribe to such a mindless and hateful agenda.
The bigots would be upset to hear those truths about them-
selves... IF they even had the sense to *recognize* those as
truths. Unfortunately, most of them are mindless lemmings who
unquestioningly follow their False Teachers' phony and UN-
Biblical dogmas like automatons.
You are a real great guy to be speaking about telling the truth.
You claim dozens of things, yet you fail to back up any of them.
Hypocrite.
ROTFL!!!!! This from an ignorant and bigoted troll who wouldn't
know a relevant fact if he tripped over it. And just continues to
PROVE his abject stupidity to everyone. (No wonder he doesn't
have the guts to sign his name to his posts.)
___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Do not feed the |
/ O O\__ trolls. Thank you. |
/ \ | --Mgt. |
/ \ \|__________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
And yet again, you haven't proved squat. I might not know a relavent fact if
it was posted by you because of the mere fact that you have never posted a
proven fact to date. Prove your ***** and then we can talk.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,495 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
17 Dec 2004 11:43:58 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:56:15 -0600,
Cowardly TROLL, "Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
[ ... ]
...the unsaved will nash [sic!] their teeth in agony
"left behind."
Well I'm gay, so I guess I get "left behind."
No more so than if you were straight, but stole an apple
off a vendor's cart. According to the Bible, all sins are EQUAL.
And while being gay probably isn't a sin at all, stealing that
apple **would** be, per the Bible. There's a **commandment**
against stealing!
Everyone should keep these points in mind whenever they
WHINE about homosexuality and threaten perdition for it, but
say NOTHING about the lying and other Commandment-
breaking that people engage in constantly, which puts them
in **actual** and verifiable danger of that -- per the Bible that
the bigots claim to believe in.
Homophobes are brainwashed (and mostly brain-DEAD)
bigots and hateful losers who have no socially-redeeming lives.
Sensible and intelligent people would sooner attend a rat fight
that to subscribe to such a mindless and hateful agenda.
The bigots would be upset to hear those truths about them-
selves... IF they even had the sense to *recognize* those as
truths. Unfortunately, most of them are mindless lemmings who
unquestioningly follow their False Teachers' phony and UN-
Biblical dogmas like automatons.
You are a real great guy to be speaking about telling the truth.
You claim dozens of things, yet you fail to back up any of them.
Hypocrite.
ROTFL!!!!! This from an ignorant and bigoted troll who wouldn't
know a relevant fact if he tripped over it. And just continues to
PROVE his abject stupidity to everyone. (No wonder he doesn't
have the guts to sign his name to his posts.)
___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Do not feed the |
/ O O\__ trolls. Thank you. |
/ \ | --Mgt. |
/ \ \|__________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
17 Dec 2004 08:12:41 PM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,497 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:05:24 GMT,
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
[ ... ]
...the unsaved will nash [sic!] their teeth in agony
"left behind."
Well I'm gay, so I guess I get "left behind."
No more so than if you were straight, but stole an apple
off a vendor's cart.
Or, no more than if he were straight and DIDN'T steal an apple off a
vendor's cart.
John 3:3
Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee,
Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
According to the Bible, all sins are EQUAL.
Really, where does it say that?
John 19:11
Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except
it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee
hath the greater sin.
And while being gay probably isn't a sin at all,
Matthew 15:19
For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries,
fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies...
stealing that
apple **would** be, per the Bible. There's a **commandment**
against stealing!
The New Testament alone, in no uncertain terms, speaks against
fornication no fewer than eleven times.
<snip silly>
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,495 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
17 Dec 2004 08:55:50 PM |
|
|
On 17 Dec 2004 18:12:41 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:05:24 GMT,
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
[ ... ]
...the unsaved will nash [sic!] their teeth in agony
"left behind."
Well I'm gay, so I guess I get "left behind."
No more so than if you were straight, but stole an apple
off a vendor's cart.
Or, no more than if he were straight and DIDN'T steal an
apple off a vendor's cart.
John 3:3
Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee,
Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
THANKS for helping strengethen the case i already presented...
by reminding everyone that **everyone** sins, and therefore that
salvation is by GRACE.
Which puts homosexual sex it the same category as
apple-stealing.
According to the Bible, all sins are EQUAL.
Really, where does it say that?
John 19:11
Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against
me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that
delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.
Jesus was addressing Satan. And obviously Satan (as the Bible
makes clear many times... including the place where the Lake of Fire
is provided FOR "the Devil and his angels) is sinful beyond the
capability possessed by people.
I don't have time to look it up now, but I'll remind you of the
passage that says that if a person breaks one Commandment,
he's broken them ALL.
And while being gay probably isn't a sin at all, ...
Matthew 15:19
For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries,
fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies...
Which has nothing at all yo do with BEING homosexual, any
more than it has anything to do with BEING heterosexual.
stealing that apple **would** be, per the Bible. There's a
**commandment** against stealing!
The New Testament alone, in no uncertain terms, speaks
against fornication no fewer than eleven times.
So it does. (At least, for now, I'll accept your Concordance's
count.) And it speaks out against all OTHER sins to. Including a
Commandment that very nicely covers the stealing of that apple
off the vendor's cart. So the PICKING ON and harrassment of
people having homosexual orientation, while NOT waging such
hatefulness toward petty thieves and Tarot Card readers (for
example), is hypocrisy to the Nth degree.
RRR cultists are some of the DUMBEST people on the face
of the earth. And they just keep right on **proving** that to
everyone.
And fortunately for society, there are LOTS of people like me
who shine a bright spotlight on their sociopathic stupidity.
RESTORATION of the material that
FURTHER indicts you and you ilk, follows ---
Everyone should keep these points in mind whenever they
WHINE about homosexuality and threaten perdition for it, but
say NOTHING about the lying and other Commandment-
breaking that people engage in constantly, which puts them
in **actual** and verifiable danger of that -- per the Bible that
the bigots claim to believe in.
Homophobes are brainwashed (and mostly brain-DEAD)
bigots and hateful losers who have no socially-redeeming lives.
Sensible and intelligent people would sooner attend a rat fight
that to subscribe to such a mindless and hateful agenda.
The bigots would be upset to hear those truths about them-
selves... IF they even had the sense to *recognize* those as
truths. Unfortunately, most of them are mindless lemmings who
unquestioningly follow their False Teachers' phony and UN-
Biblical dogmas like automatons.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
20 Dec 2004 11:29:19 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,495 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On 17 Dec 2004 18:12:41 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:05:24 GMT,
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
[ ... ]
...the unsaved will nash [sic!] their teeth in agony
"left behind."
Well I'm gay, so I guess I get "left behind."
No more so than if you were straight, but stole an apple
off a vendor's cart.
Or, no more than if he were straight and DIDN'T steal an
apple off a vendor's cart.
John 3:3
Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee,
Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
THANKS for helping strengethen the case i already presented...
That is not the case you presented.
by reminding everyone that **everyone** sins, and therefore that
salvation is by GRACE.
Grace not, of course, being defined as refraining from fruit theft.
Which puts homosexual sex it the same category as
apple-stealing.
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact sinful and
wrong. Doesn't exactly strengthen your arguments for same-sex
marriage, of course.
According to the Bible, all sins are EQUAL.
Really, where does it say that?
John 19:11
Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against
me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that
delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin.
Jesus was addressing Satan.
No, he wasn't. He was addressing Pilate. What Bible are you
reading???
Note the keywords there, "greater sin." Apparently some sins are
greater than others.
I don't have time to look it up now, but I'll remind you of the
passage that says that if a person breaks one Commandment,
he's broken them ALL.
All people are equally bad, but not all sins are equally bad. If they
were, there wouldn't be different ranks in heaven.
Matt 5:19
Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches
others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven,
but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great
in the kingdom of heaven.
And while being gay probably isn't a sin at all, ...
Matthew 15:19
For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries,
fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies...
Which has nothing at all yo do with BEING homosexual,
It does if homosexuality can qualify as an evil thought. If it
proceeds out of the heart, it certainly can.
Regardless, "being gay" is meaningless when homosexual sodomy is a sin.
Therefore, the best a "gay Christian" can hope for is radical
Christ-induced taste reform or a celibate life.
stealing that apple **would** be, per the Bible. There's a
**commandment** against stealing!
The New Testament alone, in no uncertain terms, speaks
against fornication no fewer than eleven times.
So it does. (At least, for now, I'll accept your Concordance's
count.)
That was my personal count excluding the historical idolatry uses.
And it speaks out against all OTHER sins to. Including a
Commandment that very nicely covers the stealing of that apple
off the vendor's cart. So the PICKING ON and harrassment of
people having homosexual orientation, while NOT waging such
hatefulness toward petty thieves and Tarot Card readers (for
example), is hypocrisy to the Nth degree.
No, it's not. Not even you are so stupid as to believe that homosexual
sodomy is equally as bad as petty theft.
No one "picks on" homosexuals. At least, not any more than they "pick
on" or "harass" worse sinners such as adulterers, murderers, etc.
Ask someone who loses half of all he has because his wronged wife
divorced his cheating ***** whether or not he feels "picked on." Ask a
dude on death row if he feels harassed.
RRR cultists are some of the DUMBEST people on the face
of the earth.
There is no evidence to show that there even are any on the face of the
earth.
<clip>
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "L. Michael Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
20 Dec 2004 12:34:52 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,495 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On 17 Dec 2004 18:12:41 -0800,
"Sneechres" < > wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:05:24 GMT,
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
<snip>
Which puts homosexual sex it the same category as
apple-stealing.
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact sinful and
wrong. Doesn't exactly strengthen your arguments for same-sex
marriage, of course.
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the secular laws of the land.
<snip>
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================================+
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
20 Dec 2004 09:34:24 PM |
|
|
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
sneechres@yahoo.com wrote:
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,495 days to BYE-BYE
Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On 17 Dec 2004 18:12:41 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:05:24 GMT,
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
<snip>
Which puts homosexual sex it the same category as
apple-stealing.
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact sinful and
wrong. Doesn't exactly strengthen your arguments for same-sex
marriage, of course.
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the secular laws of
the land.
Wasn't talking to you.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "L. Michael Roberts" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
21 Dec 2004 09:53:20 AM |
|
|
wrote:
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
wrote:
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,495 days to BYE-BYE
Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On 17 Dec 2004 18:12:41 -0800,
"Sneechres" < > wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:05:24 GMT,
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
<snip>
Which puts homosexual sex it the same category as
apple-stealing.
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact sinful and
wrong. Doesn't exactly strengthen your arguments for same-sex
marriage, of course.
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the secular laws of
the land.
Wasn't talking to you.
Look up the concepts of "public newsgroup" and "unmoderated newsgroup"
and get back to us.
--
+==================== L. Michael Roberts ======================+
This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy
Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail
"Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"
+================================================================+
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
21 Dec 2004 11:10:02 AM |
|
|
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
sneechres@yahoo.com wrote:
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the secular laws of
the land.
Wasn't talking to you.
Look up the concepts of "public newsgroup" and "unmoderated
newsgroup"
and get back to us.
You should have indicated that you were here to see your own words on a
page, since it's clear you weren't here to actually take part in a
discussion--you certainly didn't respond to anything *I* said.
--S
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fritz" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
22 Dec 2004 11:17:15 AM |
|
|
wrote:
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
wrote:
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,495 days to BYE-BYE
Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On 17 Dec 2004 18:12:41 -0800,
"Sneechres" < > wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:05:24 GMT,
"Horse Manis" <bricktexan1@aol.com (Horse Manis) wrote:
Krystal Patterson <kpatterson@swbts.edu> wrote:
<snip>
Which puts homosexual sex it the same category as
apple-stealing.
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact sinful and
wrong. Doesn't exactly strengthen your arguments for same-sex
marriage, of course.
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the secular laws of
the land.
Wasn't talking to you.
Why are you in usenet?
--
Fritz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Religion = tyranny.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,493 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
20 Dec 2004 10:05:50 PM |
|
|
On 20 Dec 2004 19:34:24 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
Which puts homosexual sex in the same category as
apple-stealing.
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact
sinful and wrong.
I made NO such "admission." I was allowing for the POSSIBILITY
that it might be regarded by God as such. And -- if so -- that would
it in the same boat as apple-stealing. (Or possibly less, IF God
*does* happen to have a rating scale for sins. Since he provided
a COMMANDMENT against stealing... but said **nothing** against
same-sex marriage.)
Doesn't exactly strengthen your arguments for same-sex
marriage, of course.
See above. Not one single WORD against it.
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the
secular laws of the land.
Wasn't talking to you.
What part of "open forum" is beyond your limited comprehension?
He made a good point.
Wish i'd thought of it!
This is NOT a theocracy. And if egalitarians are smart,
they'll make darned sure that it NEVER will be. Since mindless
bigots like you would be running it.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
21 Dec 2004 11:08:02 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,493 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On 20 Dec 2004 19:34:24 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
Which puts homosexual sex in the same category as
apple-stealing.
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact
sinful and wrong.
I made NO such "admission."
Then what does this mean?
"Which puts homosexual sex in the same category as
apple-stealing."
Theft is sinful and wrong, no? So if homosexuality is the same as
theft, then it too is sinful and wrong.
If a = b, and c = b, then c = a, right?
I was allowing for the POSSIBILITY
that it might be regarded by God as such.
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
And -- if so -- that would
it in the same boat as apple-stealing.
Theft is sinful and wrong, isn't it.
Doesn't exactly strengthen your arguments for same-sex
marriage, of course.
See above.
Nothing to see here....move along.
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the
secular laws of the land.
Wasn't talking to you.
What part of "open forum" is beyond your limited comprehension?
What part of my post was talking about the "secular laws of the land?"
He made a good point.
Fine, you discuss it with him, then. I don't have the time or desire
to debate the laws with whiny homophiles.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,492 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
21 Dec 2004 09:11:14 PM |
|
|
On 21 Dec 2004 09:08:02 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
Which puts homosexual sex in the same category as
apple-stealing. I was allowing for the POSSIBILITY
that it might be regarded by God as such. And -- if so --
that would it in the same boat as apple-stealing. (Or
possibly less, IF God *does* happen to have a rating
scale for sins. Since he provided a COMMANDMENT
against stealing... but said **nothing** against same-sex
marriage.)
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact
sinful and wrong.
I made NO such "admission."
Then what does this mean?
"Which puts homosexual sex in the same category as
apple-stealing."
Keep in in the CONTEXT in which I presented it, dishonest
troll, and even YOU should have no problem figuring it out. (For
the benefit of the readers, I've RE-assembled my paragraph,
above, as I presented it.)
Theft is sinful and wrong, no? So if homosexuality is the same as
theft, then it too is sinful and wrong.
I never said that homosexual *behavior* (as opposed to the
orientation that around 5% of people are BORN with; a variation
of normalcy) was in the same category as theft. i allowed for the
**possibility** that God MIGHT regard it to be sinful -- and IF that
were the case, then THAT would put it in the same boat as theft.
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
So what? Neither God (as in the case of the ten commandments)
nor Jesus (also God) ever condemned homosexuality. One has to
look at apostolic writing for that. And there are MANY places in the
Bible where those contradict each other.
Doesn't exactly strengthen your arguments for same-sex
marriage, of course.
See above. Not one single WORD against it.
Nothing to see here.... move along.
THANKS for this further proof on your part of just HOW
cultically-programmed, ignorant, or both, that a person has to be,
in order to embrace the loathsome hate-agendas of the RRR cult.
It's always very GOOD for the fence-sitters to see such
*obvious* examples of that.
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the
secular laws of the land.
Wasn't talking to you.
What part of "open forum" is beyond your limited
comprehension?
What part of my post was talking about the "secular laws
of the land?"
It's all tied together. Many of our laws stem from Biblical
origins.
He made a good point.
Wish I'd thought of it!
This is NOT a theocracy. And if egalitarians are smart,
they'll make darned sure that it NEVER will be. Since mindless
bigots like you would be running it.
Fine, you discuss it with him, then. I don't have the time or
desire to debate the laws with...
"...sensible and fair-minded egalitarians who have ALL
of the relevant FACTS on their side, whereas I have none
to work with, whatsoever.""
(IF you had said *that*, THEN you would have been
telling the TRUTH.)
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sneechres" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
21 Dec 2004 09:56:56 PM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,492 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On 21 Dec 2004 09:08:02 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
Which puts homosexual sex in the same category as
apple-stealing. I was allowing for the POSSIBILITY
that it might be regarded by God as such. And -- if so --
that would it in the same boat as apple-stealing. (Or
possibly less, IF God *does* happen to have a rating
scale for sins. Since he provided a COMMANDMENT
against stealing... but said **nothing** against same-sex
marriage.)
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact
sinful and wrong.
I made NO such "admission."
Then what does this mean?
"Which puts homosexual sex in the same category as
apple-stealing."
Keep in in the CONTEXT in which I presented it, dishonest
troll,
Why don't you cry about it.
If you don't like giving an account for what you say, think before
hitting the post button. Whining about context (and unjustly at that)
is just you acting like a big baby.
Theft is sinful and wrong, no? So if homosexuality is the same
as
theft, then it too is sinful and wrong.
I never said that homosexual *behavior* (as opposed to the
orientation that around 5% of people are BORN with; a variation
of normalcy) was in the same category as theft.
What is homosexual "behavior?"
i allowed for the
**possibility** that God MIGHT regard it to be sinful --
That is not at all what you have said. Admit that fornication is a
sin, Craig, and then we can talk.
and IF that
were the case, then THAT would put it in the same boat as theft.
And back to square one.
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
So what?
Heh.
Neither God (as in the case of the ten commandments)
nor Jesus (also God) ever condemned homosexuality.
Why does the OT stop at the ten commandments? Doesn't coveting include
lust? I thought it did.
Why did Christ repeat the Genesis account of human creation, ie the
male-female model?
One has to
look at apostolic writing for that.
So is apostolic scripture not in fact scripture now? To believe so is
heresy, you know.
And there are MANY places in the
Bible where those contradict each other.
Really, where. Let's do contradictions!
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the
secular laws of the land.
Wasn't talking to you.
What part of "open forum" is beyond your limited
comprehension?
What part of my post was talking about the "secular laws
of the land?"
It's all tied together.
Well, if you want to debate the law with him, be my guest.
Many of our laws stem from Biblical
origins.
Yes, homosexuality used to be a capital offense in this country. But
now we have "separation of church and state" so the laws are not really
based on Biblical principles anymore.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,492 days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
22 Dec 2004 12:00:08 AM |
|
|
On 21 Dec 2004 19:56:56 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
Which puts homosexual sex in the same category as
apple-stealing. I was allowing for the POSSIBILITY
that it might be regarded by God as such. And -- if so --
that would it in the same boat as apple-stealing. (Or
possibly less, IF God *does* happen to have a rating
scale for sins. Since he provided a COMMANDMENT
against stealing... but said **nothing** against same-sex
marriage.)
Hm, nice to see you admit that homosexuality is in fact
sinful and wrong.
I made NO such "admission."
Then what does this mean?
"Which puts homosexual sex in the same category as
apple-stealing."
Keep ii in the CONTEXT in which I presented it, dishonest
troll, and even YOU should have no problem figuring it out. (For
the benefit of the readers, I've RE-assembled my paragraph,
above, as I presented it.)
<Clueless & immature whining flushed. No facts lost.>
Theft is sinful and wrong, no? So if homosexuality is the same
as theft, then it too is sinful and wrong.
I never said that homosexual *behavior* (as opposed to the
orientation that around 5% of people are BORN with; a variation
of normalcy) as in the same category as theft.
What is homosexual "behavior?"
The same as heterosexual behavior, when it comes to sex.
Except that same-sex partners are involved. As you KNEW --
***troll***.
That is not at all what you have said. Admit that fornication
is a sin, Craig, and then we can talk.
The Bible says that it is. It says the same about fortune-
telling and eating shellfish. So why do clueless and hateful loons
like you pick on homosexuals, while spending MUCH less effort
on fornication by HETEROsexuals -- almost NO effort with respect
to fortune-tellers -- and *absolutely* none with respect to eating
lobster and shrimp.. Can you spell: H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E ???
[ ... ]
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
So what? Neither God (as in the case of the Ten Command-
ments) nor Jesus (also God) ever condemned homosexuality.
Why does the OT stop at the ten commandments? Doesn't
coveting include lust? I thought it did.
Uh-huh. Right. And just WHAT does same-sex marriage for
committed and loving partners have to do with that? THAT'S what
you morons were so bent out of shape over, until BOTH houses of
Congress handed your collective ***** to you on your attempt to get
a Bigotry Amendment.
Why did Christ repeat the Genesis account of human creation,
ie the male-female model?
Ask HIM.
One has to look at apostolic writing for that.
So is apostolic scripture not in fact scripture now? To believe
so is heresy, you know.
Oh, "WAAAaaahhh!" (You were born out of your time; a few hundre
years earlier, and you could have had a ball during the Inquisition.
Or handling a ducking stool.)
And there are MANY places in the Bible where those contradict
each other.
Really, where. Let's do contradictions!
Entire BOOKS have been written that document dozens of them.
So I'm not playing your trollish game.
The concept of "sin" is totally IRRELEVANT in the
secular laws of the land.
Wasn't talking to you.
What part of "open forum" is beyond your limited
comprehension?
What part of my post was talking about the "secular laws
of the land?"
It's all tied together. ###--> Many of our laws stem from
Biblical origins.
Yes, homosexuality used to be a capital offense in this country.
But now we have "separation of church and state" so the laws
are not really based on Biblical principles anymore.
Thank heavens!!! Society has steadily been outgrowing its
absurd bigotries. As for our laws -- most of the ones still on the
books which deal with the way people interact with each other
ARE still in very close alignment with Bible teachings.
And pretty much the common demoninator for the vast majority
of BOTH our laws and biblical precepts is the Golden Rule.
If everyone would simply live by that, it would probably solve/
prevent 90-95% of the world's problems overnight.
Golden Rule = Common Sense.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
22 Dec 2004 10:55:23 AM |
|
|
Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,492 days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!! wrote:
On 21 Dec 2004 19:56:56 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
L. Michael Roberts wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
Theft is sinful and wrong, no? So if homosexuality is the
same
as theft, then it too is sinful and wrong.
I never said that homosexual *behavior* (as opposed to the
orientation that around 5% of people are BORN with; a variation
of normalcy) as in the same category as theft.
What is homosexual "behavior?"
The same as heterosexual behavior,
What is "heterosexual behavior?"
when it comes to sex.
Really, straight sex and gay sex are the same??? I don't think a
medical doctor or even a drooling moron would agree with you there.
Except that same-sex partners are involved.
Oh yes, a small unimportant detail. ;)
Explain the following.
Romans 1
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even
their women did change the natural use into that which is against
nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman,
burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that
which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their
error which was meet.
That is not at all what you have said. Admit that fornication
is a sin, Craig, and then we can talk.
The Bible says that it is.
So, according to the Bible, it is sinful to engage in any sexual
contact outside of the Biblical context of marriage (which was given by
Christ in at least two gospels as the creation model).
It says the same about fortune-
telling and eating shellfish.
You think that Levitical dietary laws are the equivalent of New
Testament moral laws on sex and purity? Do you really, honestly
believe that? That eating a clam is the same as committing murder?
Do you think even God believes that?
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
So what? Neither God (as in the case of the Ten Command-
ments) nor Jesus (also God) ever condemned homosexuality.
Why does the OT stop at the ten commandments? Doesn't
coveting include lust? I thought it did.
Uh-huh. Right.
So, then, the Ten Commandments do in fact mention fornication,
homosexuality, and other sexual sins in the context of covetousness,
which they are.
And just WHAT does same-sex marriage for
committed and loving partners have to do with that?
There's no such thing--any more than there's a loving form of murder
that somehow does't fall under "Thou shalt not murder." What a silly
attempt to justify immorality.
Why did Christ repeat the Genesis account of human creation,
ie the male-female model?
Ask HIM.
I don't need to because I already know. Do you?
One has to look at apostolic writing for that.
So is apostolic scripture not in fact scripture now? To believe
so is heresy, you know.
Oh, "WAAAaaahhh!"
Answer the question, Craig. Are you a gnostic, now? The New Testament
is largely garbage except those passages you personally "like?" That's
how it appears.
I judge from your words that your beliefs are heretical. Am I wrong?
And there are MANY places in the Bible where those contradict
each other.
Really, where. Let's do contradictions!
Entire BOOKS have been written that document dozens of them.
"Someone else has them." Ha, right.
So I'm not playing your trollish game.
Don't bring up a topic you aren't willing to discuss, loser.
--S
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,491days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
22 Dec 2004 05:59:11 PM |
|
|
On 22 Dec 2004 08:55:23 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
[ ... ]
And there are MANY places in the Bible where those contradict
each other.
Really, where. Let's do contradictions!
Entire BOOKS have been written that document dozens of them.
"Someone else has them." Ha, right.
Oh good grief. I can only think of about a dozen or so people in
here who live-in-denial-of-the-obvious/play-dumb/are-as-trollish as
you do/are.
I may not be sure how to access a message ID yet, to put in a
Usenet post, while *you* ARE knowledgeable in that are. So in light
of that, you'd have me presume that you are too DUMB to know how
to put the words "Bible contradictions" in to Google's search engine?
That brought up 15,500 hits! Including THIS **very** compre-
hensive and well-organized site:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html
AFTER you've looked at that and given me your honest assess-
ment of it, I'll respond to the REST of this post.
(LOL!!!! If you are honest enough to do that, it'll be FUN to see
how you try to weasel your way out of that HOST of bonafide
contradictions.)
[[[ READERS: Will she respond to that, or chicken out? And if
she **does** respond, will she be honest enough to ADMIT
that the Bible is riddled with verifiable contradictions...
as that site very clearly proves? (My bet is she'll be in
denial -- as is TYPICAL for her, whenever she's confronted
with FACTS she doesn't like.) ]]]
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
22 Dec 2004 07:55:12 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,491days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:41cd03a7.13871398@netnews.mchsi.com...
On 22 Dec 2004 08:55:23 -0800,
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
[ ... ]
And there are MANY places in the Bible where those contradict
each other.
Really, where. Let's do contradictions!
Entire BOOKS have been written that document dozens of them.
"Someone else has them." Ha, right.
Oh good grief. I can only think of about a dozen or so people in
here who live-in-denial-of-the-obvious/play-dumb/are-as-trollish as
you do/are.
I may not be sure how to access a message ID yet, to put in a
Usenet post, while *you* ARE knowledgeable in that are. So in light
of that, you'd have me presume that you are too DUMB to know how
to put the words "Bible contradictions" in to Google's search engine?
That brought up 15,500 hits! Including THIS **very** compre-
hensive and well-organized site:
What you fail to mention is that many, many of those hits are sites refuting
the typical ***** that numbnut Satanists like you say are contradictions.
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html
I'll show a refutation of just one of the "contradictions" below...
The supposed contradiction...
Who is the father of Joseph?
MAT 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus,
who is called Christ.
LUK 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as
was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli.
The truth can be found here and many other sites similar to it.
http://www.visionquestpublishing.org/Docs/Simply_Truth/Simply_Truth.pdf
"Contradiction" refuted, just like all the other supposed contradictions
are. All it takes is a little investigation.
AFTER you've looked at that and given me your honest assess-
ment of it, I'll respond to the REST of this post.
(LOL!!!! If you are honest enough to do that, it'll be FUN to see
how you try to weasel your way out of that HOST of bonafide
contradictions.)
[[[ READERS: Will she respond to that, or chicken out? And if
she **does** respond, will she be honest enough to ADMIT
that the Bible is riddled with verifiable contradictions...
as that site very clearly proves? (My bet is she'll be in
denial -- as is TYPICAL for her, whenever she's confronted
with FACTS she doesn't like.) ]]]
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
Once again Craig, you still don't know ***** about facts. Start proving what
you post and maybe you will get some credibility and possibly even respect.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,491days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
22 Dec 2004 10:35:34 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 19:55:12 -0600,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
[ ... ]
And there are MANY places in the Bible where those contradict
each other.
Really, where. Let's do contradictions!
Entire BOOKS have been written that document dozens of them.
"Someone else has them." Ha, right.
Oh good grief. I can only think of about a dozen or so people in
here who live-in-denial-of-the-obvious/play-dumb/are-as-trollish as
you do/are.
I may not be sure how to access a message ID yet, to put in a
Usenet post, while *you* ARE knowledgeable in that area. So in light
of that, you'd have me presume that you are too DUMB to know how
to put the words "Bible contradictions" into Google's search engine?
That brought up 15,500 hits! Including THIS **very** compre-
hensive and well-organized site:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html
What you fail to mention is that many, many of those hits are sites refuting
the typical ***** that numbnut Satanists like you say are contradictions.
(1) I'm a Christian, and you are still a liar.
(2) I **recognize** that the Bible contains MANY contradictions,
as the site that I just cited PROVES. While *you* are still
a brainwashed and/or cultically-programmed and pig-headed
ignoramus who wouldn't recognize a FACT if you tripped over
it.
I'll show a refutation of just one of the "contradictions" below...
The supposed contradiction...
Who is the father of Joseph?
MAT 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom
was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
LUK 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age,
being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli.
The truth can be found here and many other sites similar to it.
http://www.visionquestpublishing.org/Docs/Simply_Truth/Simply_Truth.pdf
"Contradiction" refuted, just like all the other supposed contradictions
are. All it takes is a little investigation.
Some *apparent* contradictions can be resoled as not being such.
But many, and perhaps even MOST, of them -- ARE contradictions
and thus *cannot* ever be refuted.
AFTER you've looked at that and given me your honest assess-
ment of it, I'll respond to the REST of this post.
(LOL!!!! If you are honest enough to do that, it'll be FUN to see
how you try to weasel your way out of that HOST of bonafide
contradictions.)
[[[ READERS: Will she respond to that, or chicken out? And if
she **does** respond, will she be honest enough to ADMIT
that the Bible is riddled with verifiable contradictions...
as that site very clearly proves? (My bet is she'll be in
denial -- as is TYPICAL for her, whenever she's confronted
with FACTS she doesn't like.) ]]]
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
23 Dec 2004 06:07:36 AM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,491days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:41cf486d.7614460@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 19:55:12 -0600,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
[ ... ]
And there are MANY places in the Bible where those contradict
each other.
Really, where. Let's do contradictions!
Entire BOOKS have been written that document dozens of them.
"Someone else has them." Ha, right.
Oh good grief. I can only think of about a dozen or so people in
here who live-in-denial-of-the-obvious/play-dumb/are-as-trollish as
you do/are.
I may not be sure how to access a message ID yet, to put in a
Usenet post, while *you* ARE knowledgeable in that area. So in light
of that, you'd have me presume that you are too DUMB to know how
to put the words "Bible contradictions" into Google's search engine?
That brought up 15,500 hits! Including THIS **very** compre-
hensive and well-organized site:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html
What you fail to mention is that many, many of those hits are sites
refuting
the typical ***** that numbnut Satanists like you say are contradictions.
(1) I'm a Christian, and you are still a liar.
(2) I **recognize** that the Bible contains MANY contradictions,
as the site that I just cited PROVES. While *you* are still
a brainwashed and/or cultically-programmed and pig-headed
ignoramus who wouldn't recognize a FACT if you tripped over
it.
I'll show a refutation of just one of the "contradictions" below...
The supposed contradiction...
Who is the father of Joseph?
MAT 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom
was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
LUK 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age,
being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli.
The truth can be found here and many other sites similar to it.
http://www.visionquestpublishing.org/Docs/Simply_Truth/Simply_Truth.pdf
"Contradiction" refuted, just like all the other supposed
contradictions
are. All it takes is a little investigation.
Some *apparent* contradictions can be resoled as not being such.
But many, and perhaps even MOST, of them -- ARE contradictions
and thus *cannot* ever be refuted.
Are you trying to redefine what "is" is again Craig?
AFTER you've looked at that and given me your honest assess-
ment of it, I'll respond to the REST of this post.
(LOL!!!! If you are honest enough to do that, it'll be FUN to see
how you try to weasel your way out of that HOST of bonafide
contradictions.)
[[[ READERS: Will she respond to that, or chicken out? And if
she **does** respond, will she be honest enough to ADMIT
that the Bible is riddled with verifiable contradictions...
as that site very clearly proves? (My bet is she'll be in
denial -- as is TYPICAL for her, whenever she's confronted
with FACTS she doesn't like.) ]]]
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
You write as someone who didn't even bother to read sneechres or my own
reply. Either that or you have horrible case of denial. You've been proved
wrong. You've been beaten. And just as you have done when I asked you to
prove what you claim in your SN, you just seem to be able to blabber
rubbish.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,491days to BYE-BYE Bushie! Forever!!" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
23 Dec 2004 08:12:35 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 06:07:36 -0600,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
[ ... ]
And there are MANY places in the Bible where those contradict
each other.
Really, where. Let's do contradictions!
Entire BOOKS have been written that document dozens of them.
"Someone else has them." Ha, right.
Oh good grief. I can only think of about a dozen or so people in
here who live-in-denial-of-the-obvious/play-dumb/are-as-trollish as
you do/are.
I may not be sure how to access a message ID yet, to put in a
Usenet post, while *you* ARE knowledgeable in that area. So in light
of that, you'd have me presume that you are too DUMB to know how
to put the words "Bible contradictions" into Google's search engine?
That brought up 15,500 hits! Including THIS **very** compre-
hensive and well-organized site:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html
What you fail to mention is that many, many of those hits are sites
refuting the typical ***** that numbnut Satanists like you say are
contradictions.
(1) I'm a Christian, and you are still a liar.
(2) I **recognize** that the Bible contains MANY contradictions,
as the site that I just cited PROVES. While *you* are still
a brainwashed and/or cultically-programmed and pig-headed
ignoramus who wouldn't recognize a FACT if you tripped over
it.
I'll show a refutation of just one of the "contradictions" below...
The supposed contradiction...
Who is the father of Joseph?
MAT 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom
was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
LUK 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age,
being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli.
The truth can be found here and many other sites similar to it.
http://www.visionquestpublishing.org/Docs/Simply_Truth/Simply_Truth.pdf
"Contradiction" refuted, just like all the other supposed
contradictions
are. All it takes is a little investigation.
Some *apparent* contradictions can be resolved as not being such.
But many, and perhaps even MOST, of them -- ARE contradictions
and thus *cannot* ever be refuted.
Are you trying to redefine what "is" is again Craig?
What I just said is very clear.
But we all have YET to see **you** backing up the hateful and
loathsome agendas against human rights that you espouse, with ANY
relevant **facts.**
AFTER you've looked at that and given me your honest assess-
ment of it, I'll respond to the REST of this post.
(LOL!!!! If you are honest enough to do that, it'll be FUN to see
how you try to weasel your way out of that HOST of bonafide
contradictions.)
[[[ READERS: Will she respond to that, or chicken out? And if
she **does** respond, will she be honest enough to ADMIT
that the Bible is riddled with verifiable contradictions...
as that site very clearly proves? (My bet is she'll be in
denial -- as is TYPICAL for her, whenever she's confronted
with FACTS she doesn't like.) ]]]
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
You write as someone who didn't even bother to read sneechres
or my own reply.
Wrong. I responded directly to you. This time. But whever
someone as clueless as you are makes a "response" to one of my
posts that contains NO facts, and nothing but whiney bigotry, I
usually simply repeat my PREVIOUS post to him, as a reminder of
that to the readers.
As for "Sneechres" -- she DID respond to one of my posts, but it
reached my server AFTER she wondered why I had seemed to have
ignored it. She will be getting my response to that post.
You've been proved wrong.
Yeah? Where?
You've been beaten.
By YOUR ilk? When pigs fly!
And just as you have done when I asked you to prove what
you claim in your SN, ...
"SN?"
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
Every time a person supports bigotry in public, and presents NO
relevant FACTS to back his/her stance in behalf of a loathsome
agenda against individual liberties and human rights, that person
has -- ironically -- further **damaged** the cause he/she supports.
And every time a fair-minded and sensible egalitarian opposes
such a bigot, publicly, and **presents** relevant FACTS that are
damaging to the bigot's agenda, that TOO is an additional nail in
the coffin lid of the agenda, and a push of that casket CLOSER
to the Drain of Extinction -- its well-deserved ultimate destination.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
(E-Mail address is valid when removing _ from it.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Reasoned Insanity" |
|
| Title: Re: The BLATANT Lies of the RRR Cult Hypocrites! |
23 Dec 2004 04:30:24 PM |
|
|
"Craig Chilton -- Countdown to 1/20/09: 1,491days to BYE-BYE Bushie!
Forever!!" <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:41ced06b.42434130@netnews.mchsi.com...
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 06:07:36 -0600,
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Reasoned Insanity" <mintclovers@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:
"Sneechres" <sneechres@yahoo.com> wrote:
[ ... ]
I wonder if you got that idea from the Bible or something!
[ ... ]
And there are MANY places in the Bible where those contradict
each other.
Really, where. L | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
