| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Mike" |
| Date: |
21 Nov 2004 08:37:31 AM |
| Object: |
The Blood-stained Century of Evolution |
The blood-stained 'century of evolution'
by Carl Wieland
Those attacking Christianity sometimes point to the many religious
wars and atrocities perpetrated in the name of Christ and the Church.
They forget that not everyone self-labeled 'Christian' truly follows
Christ. Also, that many times more people have been killed this
century, most by their own governments, than in all religious
conflicts, ever.1 And this slaughter happened because of philosophies
openly hostile to biblical Christianity, and flowing directly from
evolutionary belief.
Nazism openly proclaimed its dependence on Darwin.2 It was right and
moral for the strongest race to survive; to have pity for the weak was
to defy nature's laws. It is doubtful whether this brutal ideology
would have so captivated the nation that gave us Bach and Luther if
not for the 'scientific' underpinning of evolution.
Communism also took evolution to its logical conclusion. If everything
just evolved from 'natural law,' then man's opinion, not God's Word,
determines what is right and wrong. If the working class can take
power by armed struggle, then this is 'right,' regardless of how many
must die to bring in the socialist paradise. Communism's death toll
far outranks the Nazis'--probably more than 90 million worldwide.3
Some have suggested that the bloodthirsty deeds of Stalin were an
'aberration' from the revolution's ideals. However, it was Lenin, the
'father' of the Russian revolution, who 'perfected the science of mass
killings,' and total, merciless brutality as the ultimate method of
political control.4 Evolution was the chief tool used to brainwash
communism's masses into 'scientific atheism.' If everything just
evolved, then everything is at the whim of the most powerful, and
there is no Maker to whom to be answerable. Hence Stalin's belief that
killing millions of people was no worse than mowing your lawn (grass
is our cousin in evolutionary doctrine).
Mao's reign of terror and lies resulted in the deaths of tens of
millions. It is no coincidence that his two favorite books were by the
evolutionists Darwin and Huxley. With millions dying from his forced
famine, his physician records that Mao said, 'We have so many people
we can afford to lose a few.'5 His successors have since persecuted
and killed hundreds of thousands more.
Such overt 'state' evil makes it easy to forget what the Bible teaches
about the evil within all of fallen mankind. Despite communism's
decline, the basic philosophy of evolutionism (i.e. man's opinion, not
God's, is the ultimate authority) remains securely in control. They're
not shooting people scrambling over the Berlin Wall anymore, but
millions of people are being torn apart in their mother's womb in
'democratic' countries.
Today, the ideology of the ultra-free market, directly related to
Darwinian 'might is right,' is on the rise. The Bible of course
affirms private property, and the free and fair exchange of goods.
However, at the same time it endorses civil government as a necessary
restraint upon the sinful nature of mankind. Even the billionaire
speculator George Soros has warned against unfettered 'survival of the
fittest' capitalism. He says 'What used to be a medium of exchange has
usurped the place of fundamental values. Being successful is not
identical with being right.'6
Soros's comments make sense only if there are such things as immutable
values and inalienable rights. But these cannot exist unless there is
a Creator God Who has revealed such truths infallibly to His creation.
Thus, the creation/evolution issue is not just about origins; it is
the key to which authority source will be seen as foundational in
human affairs--God, through His revealed Word, or man's opinion. May
God be pleased to keep on using Creation magazine widely in spreading
these vital, foundational gospel truths.
References and notes
1/About 130 million (not including the hundreds of millions killed by
abortion) were slaughtered this century in the name of atheism,
whereas all those killed in 'the name of Christ' in all of recorded
history was at most around 17 million. See James Kennedy and Jerry
Newcombe, What if Jesus had never been born?, Thomas Nelson,
Nashville, 1994.
2/Evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith wrote: 'The German Führer, as I have
consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought
to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.'
Evolution and Ethics, Putnam, New York, p. 230, 1947.
3/Black Book of Communism, The Courier-Mail Weekend, Brisbane, p. 8,
13 December 1997.
4/Men who taught the world to hate, The Sunday Mail, Brisbane, p. 67,
6 July 1997.
5/The Great Dying, The Sunday Mail, Brisbane, pp. 59–60, 2
February 1997.
6/G. Soros, in News Weekly, p. 24, 8 February 1997.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/blood.asp
.
|
|
| User: "Dave Oldridge" |
|
| Title: Re: The Blood-stained Century of Evolution |
21 Nov 2004 11:14:30 AM |
|
|
(Mike) wrote in
news:f6abd7f3.0411210637.131f2d7f@posting.google.com:
The blood-stained 'century of evolution'
by Carl Wieland
Those attacking Christianity sometimes point to the many religious
wars and atrocities perpetrated in the name of Christ and the Church.
They forget that not everyone self-labeled 'Christian' truly follows
Christ. Also, that many times more people have been killed this
And, to my direct knowledge, most YEC apologists are like that. They
label themselves as Christian but practise a religion of bibliolatry,
blasphemy and false witness.
century, most by their own governments, than in all religious
conflicts, ever.1 And this slaughter happened because of philosophies
openly hostile to biblical Christianity, and flowing directly from
evolutionary belief.
No, it largely happened because we invented the machine gun, and other
even more drastic methods of mass destruction, making it easy to kill a
lot of people.
Nazism openly proclaimed its dependence on Darwin.2 It was right and
*****. Pure and utter false witness again. Hitler LOUDLY claimed to
be doing GOD's work.
moral for the strongest race to survive; to have pity for the weak was
to defy nature's laws. It is doubtful whether this brutal ideology
would have so captivated the nation that gave us Bach and Luther if
not for the 'scientific' underpinning of evolution.
I dunno. Luther's antisemitism (published) rivals that of Hitler.
Anyone trying to blame the activities of the Nazis on any teaching about
evolution is clearly NOT a student of history. There were a number of
factors, and Luther's antisemitism was actually a part of the equation.
A bigger part was the rather rapacious demands for reparations made by
Britain and France after WWI, which triggered an economic disaster in
Germany that is difficult to imagine.
Communism also took evolution to its logical conclusion. If everything
Stalinism rejected Darwin's insights and substituted the flawed ideas of
Lysenko in their place, exiling scientists who disagreed.
just evolved from 'natural law,' then man's opinion, not God's Word,
determines what is right and wrong. If the working class can take
power by armed struggle, then this is 'right,' regardless of how many
must die to bring in the socialist paradise. Communism's death toll
far outranks the Nazis'--probably more than 90 million worldwide.3
Communism shares with fundamentalist Christianity the same error.
Communists think that you can FORCE people to 'be good.'
Some have suggested that the bloodthirsty deeds of Stalin were an
'aberration' from the revolution's ideals. However, it was Lenin, the
'father' of the Russian revolution, who 'perfected the science of mass
killings,' and total, merciless brutality as the ultimate method of
political control.4 Evolution was the chief tool used to brainwash
communism's masses into 'scientific atheism.' If everything just
*****. Another pure lie. Darwin's insights were found to be "too
bourgeois" for the Stalinists. They exiled the scientists and pushed
Lysenko's flawed ideas onto their school system by political fiat (just
as creationists want to do today with their own flawed ideas). Russia
and the Ukraine are still paying the economic price of that error.
evolved, then everything is at the whim of the most powerful, and
there is no Maker to whom to be answerable. Hence Stalin's belief that
killing millions of people was no worse than mowing your lawn (grass
is our cousin in evolutionary doctrine).
Actually, Russian scientists (the real ones) have been more prone to see
the evolutionary advantages in cooperation than westerners who come from
an ideology of "power to the richest."
Mao's reign of terror and lies resulted in the deaths of tens of
millions. It is no coincidence that his two favorite books were by the
evolutionists Darwin and Huxley. With millions dying from his forced
famine, his physician records that Mao said, 'We have so many people
we can afford to lose a few.'5 His successors have since persecuted
and killed hundreds of thousands more.
Seems to me, Mao's little red book was the really popular work around
there. I have no idea what he read himself. He had a reputation as a
poet and a bridge player.
Such overt 'state' evil makes it easy to forget what the Bible teaches
about the evil within all of fallen mankind. Despite communism's
decline, the basic philosophy of evolutionism (i.e. man's opinion, not
God's, is the ultimate authority) remains securely in control. They're
not shooting people scrambling over the Berlin Wall anymore, but
millions of people are being torn apart in their mother's womb in
'democratic' countries.
Apparently YEC apologists do not care for God's opinion. He gave it
quite clearly in scripture when He said "Thou shalt not bear false
witness." Unfortunately, YEC apologetics have come to depend on false
witness. They lie about science. They lie about the motives of
scientists and they lie about their own. That latter lie is especially
telling, since it is deliberate and malicious rebellion against God.
Today, the ideology of the ultra-free market, directly related to
Darwinian 'might is right,' is on the rise. The Bible of course
You know, from a STRICTLY 19th century viewpoint, you might be able to
justify that. But from today's knowledge of human evolution, it's all
too clear that the ability to cooperate in large-scale projects is what
has put us ahead of the other animals on this planet. However, that
ability may also be our undoing if it proves, in the end, that we are
collectively no smarter than a yeast culture.
affirms private property, and the free and fair exchange of goods.
However, at the same time it endorses civil government as a necessary
restraint upon the sinful nature of mankind. Even the billionaire
speculator George Soros has warned against unfettered 'survival of the
fittest' capitalism. He says 'What used to be a medium of exchange has
usurped the place of fundamental values. Being successful is not
identical with being right.'6
The Bible said it so succinctly. The love of money is the root of all
evil.
Soros's comments make sense only if there are such things as immutable
values and inalienable rights. But these cannot exist unless there is
a Creator God Who has revealed such truths infallibly to His creation.
Which is absolutely not something we can rule on scientifically. What we
CAN say scientifically is that humans and chimps have a common genetic
ancestor.
Thus, the creation/evolution issue is not just about origins; it is
the key to which authority source will be seen as foundational in
human affairs--God, through His revealed Word, or man's opinion. May
God be pleased to keep on using Creation magazine widely in spreading
these vital, foundational gospel truths.
In order to please God, obey Him. Stop trying to place your private
interpretation of scripture above the reality of His creation and just
take it straight. You may find that you learn some surprising truths
about the world, about yourself, and about God.
But ignoring and defying Him and bearing false witness in His name is apt
to lead you to some of those places even angels will not walk.
References and notes
1/About 130 million (not including the hundreds of millions killed by
abortion) were slaughtered this century in the name of atheism,
whereas all those killed in 'the name of Christ' in all of recorded
history was at most around 17 million. See James Kennedy and Jerry
Newcombe, What if Jesus had never been born?, Thomas Nelson,
Nashville, 1994.
Abortions are not done in the name of atheism. They are done (when they
are done wrongly) in the name of "convenience" or in the name of
"economic necessity." When they are done as triage, they are just the
unfortunate consequence of disease and accident trauma.
2/Evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith wrote: 'The German Führer, as I have
consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought
to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.'
Evolution and Ethics, Putnam, New York, p. 230, 1947.
Keith was a Nazi, not a scientist (though his Nazism took the form of a
kind of social Darwinism that has little real science in it).
3/Black Book of Communism, The Courier-Mail Weekend, Brisbane, p. 8,
13 December 1997.
4/Men who taught the world to hate, The Sunday Mail, Brisbane, p. 67,
6 July 1997.
5/The Great Dying, The Sunday Mail, Brisbane, pp. 59–60, 2
February 1997.
6/G. Soros, in News Weekly, p. 24, 8 February 1997.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/blood.asp
An interesting foray into logical fallacy, laced with outright lies and
misrepresentations. So what's your excuse for the false witness? Were
you misled or are you actually part of the devil's crew here? Inquiring
minds want to know.
--
Dave Oldridge+
ICQ 1800667
A false witness is worse than no witness at all.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Litvintchouk" |
|
| Title: Re: The Blood-stained Century of Evolution |
21 Nov 2004 11:13:12 AM |
|
|
Mike wrote:
The blood-stained 'century of evolution'
by Carl Wieland
Those attacking Christianity sometimes point to the many religious
wars and atrocities perpetrated in the name of Christ and the Church.
They forget that not everyone self-labeled 'Christian' truly follows
Christ.
How do we tell the difference a priori between those self-described
Christians who "truly follow Christ" and those who do not?
Also, that many times more people have been killed this
century, most by their own governments, than in all religious
conflicts, ever.1 And this slaughter happened because of philosophies
openly hostile to biblical Christianity, and flowing directly from
evolutionary belief.
That is false.
A lot of oppression and even genocide did have its roots in Social
Darwinism. But Social Darwinism was a pseudo-scientific political
corruption of evolutionary theory that no reputable scientists
supported. To use your analogy, not everyone self-labeled an
evolutionist truly supports scientific evolution; some claimed to be
evolutionists but were really Social Darwinists.
When the Nazis spoke of "survival of the fittest" and the enslavement of
so-called "inferior races," they were speaking of Social Darwinism.
If anything, modern evolutionary science has totally undercut such
racialist ideas. The DNA evidence has now shown that there is far more
genetic variation among whites (and among blacks), than there is between
whites and blacks. Thus skin color is a relatively minor part of the
human phenotype and isn't linked to much in the human genotype at all.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/blood.asp
By the way, do you really believe that there were dinosaurs in the
Garden of Eden? Because that's what it shows on your website:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2001/0419new_prod.asp
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Blood-stained Century of Evolution |
21 Nov 2004 07:04:46 PM |
|
|
Steven Litvintchouk wrote:
Mike wrote:
The blood-stained 'century of evolution'
by Carl Wieland
Those attacking Christianity sometimes point to the many religious
wars and atrocities perpetrated in the name of Christ and the Church.
They forget that not everyone self-labeled 'Christian' truly follows
Christ.
How do we tell the difference a priori between those self-described
Christians who "truly follow Christ" and those who do not?
Well...
1. Real Christians follow the teachings of Jesus.
They turn the other cheek, sell all they have and
give to the poor and do all their praying in private
as per scripture and commands of Jesus.
2. False Christians ignore the commands of Jesus.
3. Real Christians abhor violence and war.
4. Faux Christains like war and never mind if their
goverment lies them into one, they often even cheer
the liars on. No amount of killing or mass murder
makes them care.
5. Real Christians know they have a duty to help others
as per Matthew 25:31-45 and know that our government
has a role to play in all of this.
6. Faux Christian's ***** and belly ache about "too many taxes"
and resent helping the poor, elderly or unfortunate.
Generally thy have never read Matthew 25.
7. Real Christians are humble and meek.
8. Faux christians are arrogant, and loudmouthed, right winged
and obnoxious.
9. Real Christians know Jesus outranks Paul and where Jesus
commands, Pauls ramblings to not over rule.
10. Faux Christians are always looking for loophole to
avoid the commands of Jesus.
11. Real Christians abstain from being judgmental
as per scritpture.
12. Faux Christians use their fake religion as an
excuse to thrust their prejudices and bigotries
on others.
Also, that many times more people have been killed this
century, most by their own governments, than in all religious
conflicts, ever.1 And this slaughter happened because of philosophies
openly hostile to biblical Christianity, and flowing directly from
evolutionary belief.
That is false.
A lot of oppression and even genocide did have its roots in Social
Darwinism. But Social Darwinism was a pseudo-scientific political
corruption of evolutionary theory that no reputable scientists
supported. To use your analogy, not everyone self-labeled an
evolutionist truly supports scientific evolution; some claimed to be
evolutionists but were really Social Darwinists.
When the Nazis spoke of "survival of the fittest" and the enslavement of
so-called "inferior races," they were speaking of Social Darwinism.
If anything, modern evolutionary science has totally undercut such
racialist ideas. The DNA evidence has now shown that there is far more
genetic variation among whites (and among blacks), than there is between
whites and blacks. Thus skin color is a relatively minor part of the
human phenotype and isn't linked to much in the human genotype at all.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/blood.asp
By the way, do you really believe that there were dinosaurs in the
Garden of Eden? Because that's what it shows on your website:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2001/0419new_prod.asp
--
Kerry - two medals a silver and bronze star.
Bush? Well they don't give medals
for going AWOL, missing your medical and
getting grounded or falling off of a bar stool.
Kerry - a hero, Bush - a zero
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
| User: "Enkidu" |
|
| Title: AQOTM: The Blood-stained Century of Evolution |
21 Nov 2004 08:02:38 PM |
|
|
wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote in news:cnrh0t
$6jm@library1.airnews.net:
How do we tell the difference a priori between those self-described
Christians who "truly follow Christ" and those who do not?
Well...
<begin>
1. Real Christians follow the teachings of Jesus.
They turn the other cheek, sell all they have and
give to the poor and do all their praying in private
as per scripture and commands of Jesus.
2. False Christians ignore the commands of Jesus.
3. Real Christians abhor violence and war.
4. Faux Christains like war and never mind if their
goverment lies them into one, they often even cheer
the liars on. No amount of killing or mass murder
makes them care.
5. Real Christians know they have a duty to help others
as per Matthew 25:31-45 and know that our government
has a role to play in all of this.
6. Faux Christian's ***** and belly ache about "too many taxes"
and resent helping the poor, elderly or unfortunate.
Generally thy have never read Matthew 25.
7. Real Christians are humble and meek.
8. Faux christians are arrogant, and loudmouthed, right winged
and obnoxious.
9. Real Christians know Jesus outranks Paul and where Jesus
commands, Pauls ramblings to not over rule.
10. Faux Christians are always looking for loophole to
avoid the commands of Jesus.
11. Real Christians abstain from being judgmental
as per scritpture.
12. Faux Christians use their fake religion as an
excuse to thrust their prejudices and bigotries
on others.
<end>
A bit long, but right on the money.
--
Enkidu
"Yee-Ha" is not a foreign policy.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Litvintchouk" |
|
| Title: Re: The Blood-stained Century of Evolution |
21 Nov 2004 11:13:53 PM |
|
|
wbarwell wrote:
Steven Litvintchouk wrote:
Mike wrote:
The blood-stained 'century of evolution'
by Carl Wieland
Those attacking Christianity sometimes point to the many religious
wars and atrocities perpetrated in the name of Christ and the Church.
They forget that not everyone self-labeled 'Christian' truly follows
Christ.
How do we tell the difference a priori between those self-described
Christians who "truly follow Christ" and those who do not?
Well...
1. Real Christians follow the teachings of Jesus.
They turn the other cheek, sell all they have and
give to the poor and do all their praying in private
as per scripture and commands of Jesus.
Those aren't "real Christians."
They Shall Prosper That Love Thee (Psa. 122:6)
3. Real Christians abhor violence and war.
4. Faux Christains like war and never mind if their
goverment lies them into one,
I guess that means St. Augustine, who pioneered "just war theory," was a
faux Christian. Along with the Popes who prosecuted the Crusades.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "wbarwell" |
|
| Title: Re: The Blood-stained Century of Evolution |
22 Nov 2004 12:14:43 AM |
|
|
Steven Litvintchouk wrote:
wbarwell wrote:
Steven Litvintchouk wrote:
Mike wrote:
The blood-stained 'century of evolution'
by Carl Wieland
Those attacking Christianity sometimes point to the many religious
wars and atrocities perpetrated in the name of Christ and the Church.
They forget that not everyone self-labeled 'Christian' truly follows
Christ.
How do we tell the difference a priori between those self-described
Christians who "truly follow Christ" and those who do not?
Well...
1. Real Christians follow the teachings of Jesus.
They turn the other cheek, sell all they have and
give to the poor and do all their praying in private
as per scripture and commands of Jesus.
Those aren't "real Christians."
They Shall Prosper That Love Thee (Psa. 122:6)
People who do not follow the commands of Jesus are
not Christians.
3. Real Christians abhor violence and war.
4. Faux Christains like war and never mind if their
goverment lies them into one,
I guess that means St. Augustine, who pioneered "just war theory," was a
faux Christian. Along with the Popes who prosecuted the Crusades.
Yup. And our own faux christians squeal with pleasuer when Bush lies us
into a war or when Reagan or Bush and the GOP in the past supported far
right thugs like Saddam Hussein, Guatemala's genocidal Rios Montt, a self
proclaimed evangelical.
--
Kerry - two medals a silver and bronze star.
Bush? Well they don't give medals
for going AWOL, missing your medical and
getting grounded or falling off of a bar stool.
Kerry - a hero, Bush - a zero
Cheerful Charlie
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Robert" |
|
| Title: Re: The Blood-stained Century of Evolution |
21 Nov 2004 09:16:23 AM |
|
|
Mike wrote:
The blood-stained 'century of evolution'
by Carl Wieland
Those attacking Christianity sometimes point to the many religious
wars and atrocities perpetrated in the name of Christ and the Church.
They forget that not everyone self-labeled 'Christian' truly follows
Christ. Also, that many times more people have been killed this
century, most by their own governments, than in all religious
conflicts, ever.1 And this slaughter happened because of philosophies
openly hostile to biblical Christianity, and flowing directly from
evolutionary belief.
Nazism openly proclaimed its dependence on Darwin.2 It was right and
moral for the strongest race to survive; to have pity for the weak was
to defy nature's laws. It is doubtful whether this brutal ideology
would have so captivated the nation that gave us Bach and Luther if
not for the 'scientific' underpinning of evolution.
Communism also took evolution to its logical conclusion. If everything
just evolved from 'natural law,' then man's opinion, not God's Word,
determines what is right and wrong. If the working class can take
power by armed struggle, then this is 'right,' regardless of how many
must die to bring in the socialist paradise. Communism's death toll
far outranks the Nazis'--probably more than 90 million worldwide.3
Some have suggested that the bloodthirsty deeds of Stalin were an
'aberration' from the revolution's ideals. However, it was Lenin, the
'father' of the Russian revolution, who 'perfected the science of mass
killings,' and total, merciless brutality as the ultimate method of
political control.4 Evolution was the chief tool used to brainwash
communism's masses into 'scientific atheism.' If everything just
evolved, then everything is at the whim of the most powerful, and
there is no Maker to whom to be answerable. Hence Stalin's belief that
killing millions of people was no worse than mowing your lawn (grass
is our cousin in evolutionary doctrine).
Mao's reign of terror and lies resulted in the deaths of tens of
millions. It is no coincidence that his two favorite books were by the
evolutionists Darwin and Huxley. With millions dying from his forced
famine, his physician records that Mao said, 'We have so many people
we can afford to lose a few.'5 His successors have since persecuted
and killed hundreds of thousands more.
Such overt 'state' evil makes it easy to forget what the Bible teaches
about the evil within all of fallen mankind. Despite communism's
decline, the basic philosophy of evolutionism (i.e. man's opinion, not
God's, is the ultimate authority) remains securely in control. They're
not shooting people scrambling over the Berlin Wall anymore, but
millions of people are being torn apart in their mother's womb in
'democratic' countries.
Today, the ideology of the ultra-free market, directly related to
Darwinian 'might is right,' is on the rise. The Bible of course
affirms private property, and the free and fair exchange of goods.
However, at the same time it endorses civil government as a necessary
restraint upon the sinful nature of mankind. Even the billionaire
speculator George Soros has warned against unfettered 'survival of the
fittest' capitalism. He says 'What used to be a medium of exchange has
usurped the place of fundamental values. Being successful is not
identical with being right.'6
Soros's comments make sense only if there are such things as immutable
values and inalienable rights. But these cannot exist unless there is
a Creator God Who has revealed such truths infallibly to His creation.
Thus, the creation/evolution issue is not just about origins; it is
the key to which authority source will be seen as foundational in
human affairs--God, through His revealed Word, or man's opinion. May
God be pleased to keep on using Creation magazine widely in spreading
these vital, foundational gospel truths.
References and notes
1/About 130 million (not including the hundreds of millions killed by
abortion) were slaughtered this century in the name of atheism,
whereas all those killed in 'the name of Christ' in all of recorded
history was at most around 17 million. See James Kennedy and Jerry
Newcombe, What if Jesus had never been born?, Thomas Nelson,
Nashville, 1994.
2/Evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith wrote: 'The German Führer, as I have
consistently maintained, is an evolutionist; he has consciously sought
to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.'
Evolution and Ethics, Putnam, New York, p. 230, 1947.
3/Black Book of Communism, The Courier-Mail Weekend, Brisbane, p. 8,
13 December 1997.
4/Men who taught the world to hate, The Sunday Mail, Brisbane, p. 67,
6 July 1997.
5/The Great Dying, The Sunday Mail, Brisbane, pp. 59–60, 2
February 1997.
6/G. Soros, in News Weekly, p. 24, 8 February 1997.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/blood.asp
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A. Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: The Blood-stained Century of Evolution |
21 Nov 2004 08:54:10 AM |
|
|
On 21 Nov 2004 06:37:31 -0800, (Mike)
wrote:
The blood-stained 'century of evolution'
by Carl Wieland
Those attacking Christianity sometimes point to the many religious
Paranoid lie, *****. Keep your rubbish to yourself and there would
be no RESPONSE.
Are you even capable of understanding the difference?
And so you imagine that such a stupid lie in your first sentence, is
going to encourage anybody to read the rest of your nastiness?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
