THE GOD CHALLENGE



 Religions > Bible > THE GOD CHALLENGE

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 3 of 4

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "Bill M"
Date: 27 Oct 2006 10:15:21 AM
Object: THE GOD CHALLENGE
I am challenging all religious believers to supply OBJECTIVE VERIFIABLE
EVIDENCE
that their God actually exists. If you live your life based on your God
belief you should be able to supply this evidence.
P. S. Ancient documents by other humans of unknown veracity are NOT
objective verifiable evidence. They are merely the 'opinions' of other
humans.
.

User: "Azaliah"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 31 Oct 2006 09:14:41 AM
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:07:57 GMT, while bungee jumping,
"G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net> shouted thusly:

Evolution is NOT "fact" it is the "THEORY of Evolution".

It doesn't even qualify as that.
--
Azaliah (ats-al-yaw'-hoo) "Jah has reserved"
<((>< <((>< <((><
"Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth."
- John 17:17
..
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 31 Oct 2006 03:05:27 PM
Azaliah <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote:

It doesn't even qualify as that.

Elaborate. Go on - mockery's easy. Anyone can do that. Let's have a
convincing argument from you. Prove your point, as every fundamentalist
before you has failed to do in the eyes of anyone but other
fundamentalists.
.


User: "Samuel W. Heywood"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 01 Nov 2006 11:31:40 AM
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, G-Net wrote:

Evolution is NOT "fact" it is the "THEORY of Evolution". I think that
teaching kids to "use their brains" is not a bad thing UNLESS it goes
against everything that they believe in the first place. I don't think
that forcing kids to swallow the evolution myth helps them in any way.

It is a proven fact that evolution happens. There are scientific
theories and also some very interesting religious opinions about
what causes evolution to happen. Your problem is that you don't
even accept the proven fact that evolution happens.

I know for a fact how it causes problems and how it caused problems
for my own kids as well.

The learning of facts cannot cause problems for your kids, except in
the case of some kinds of facts which they should not learn about
until they are of the appropriate age. You know what kinds of facts
I am referring to. Most Christians do not consider the learning about
the fact that evolution happens to be among the kinds of facts that
they should not learn about until they are of an appropriate age.
Most children love to hear stories and to read stories about dinosaurs
and mastodons and pterodactyls and all the little horses and other
pre-historic animals. The best and most popular children's books on
that subject are written from the point of view that evolution happens.
I do not know of any children's books on that subject which say anything
against the Bible or any Christian beliefs.

Fortunately, we raised our kids to be individuals who stand up for
themselves. My kids have never hesitated to tell the teacher what
they think and why they think it and I have always backed them up.
Even college professors try to shove theories down the kids throats
as "fact",

No, they do not. They present facts as facts and theories as theories.
Theories are open for debate and discussion.

but like I said, kids who are raised to stand up for themselves are
not intimidated by college professors either.

Neither college professors nor public school teachers are allowed to
intimidate their students.

Conditioning them to reject out of hand anything not written down
in an ancient book authored and compiled thousands of years ago by
people without a fraction of the scientific knowledge currently
available *is* harming them, and potentially, through them, harming
others.

That's your opinion, I disagree completely. There is NO "scientific
knowledge currently available" that would in any way prove the Bible
incorrect. Many try to say that but it's never been true and it never
will be true. Christians aren't going away because God protects and
keeps us. Only when the rapture occurs will Christians not be around
and when that day comes, I pity those who remain...

Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62
.
User: "G-Net"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 01 Nov 2006 12:19:09 PM
"Samuel W. Heywood" <sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.62.0611011147380.1623@sdf.lonestar.org...

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, G-Net wrote:

Evolution is NOT "fact" it is the "THEORY of Evolution". I think that
teaching kids to "use their brains" is not a bad thing UNLESS it goes
against everything that they believe in the first place. I don't think
that forcing kids to swallow the evolution myth helps them in any way.


It is a proven fact that evolution happens. There are scientific
theories and also some very interesting religious opinions about
what causes evolution to happen. Your problem is that you don't
even accept the proven fact that evolution happens.

I don't believe that it is a "proven fact" that evolution happens at all.
Where are
all of the mid-evolution species bones? Where is all of this "proof" that
folks
keep talking about?

I know for a fact how it causes problems and how it caused problems
for my own kids as well.


The learning of facts cannot cause problems for your kids, except in
the case of some kinds of facts which they should not learn about
until they are of the appropriate age. You know what kinds of facts
I am referring to. Most Christians do not consider the learning about
the fact that evolution happens to be among the kinds of facts that
they should not learn about until they are of an appropriate age.

I cannot say what "most Christians" do or do not want. What I do know is
that evolution is taught in schools as "fact" and it is not fact.

Most children love to hear stories and to read stories about dinosaurs
and mastodons and pterodactyls and all the little horses and other
pre-historic animals. The best and most popular children's books on
that subject are written from the point of view that evolution happens.
I do not know of any children's books on that subject which say anything
against the Bible or any Christian beliefs.

My kids are not 3 years old. I was not referring to nursery school reading
time. I was
referring to public school and colleges.

Fortunately, we raised our kids to be individuals who stand up for
themselves. My kids have never hesitated to tell the teacher what
they think and why they think it and I have always backed them up.


Even college professors try to shove theories down the kids throats
as "fact",


No, they do not. They present facts as facts and theories as theories.
Theories are open for debate and discussion.

I disagree. I have a son in college and he would tell you a VERY different
story. I don't speak off hand, I know for a fact that it IS jammed down
kids throats.

but like I said, kids who are raised to stand up for themselves are
not intimidated by college professors either.


Neither college professors nor public school teachers are allowed to
intimidate their students.

Well, they cannot intimidate my kids but many kids ARE intimidated.

Conditioning them to reject out of hand anything not written down
in an ancient book authored and compiled thousands of years ago by
people without a fraction of the scientific knowledge currently
available *is* harming them, and potentially, through them, harming
others.


That's your opinion, I disagree completely. There is NO "scientific
knowledge currently available" that would in any way prove the Bible
incorrect. Many try to say that but it's never been true and it never
will be true. Christians aren't going away because God protects and keeps
us. Only when the rapture occurs will Christians not be around
and when that day comes, I pity those who remain...


Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62

.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 01 Nov 2006 05:01:03 PM
"G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net> wrote:

Well, they cannot intimidate my kids but many kids ARE intimidated.

Whereas they should merely be 'God-fearing', right?
.
User: "G-Net"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 01 Nov 2006 10:02:00 PM
"Midwinter" <midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns986EEA2981F82CYPMNDEXHBCJOIU@216.196.109.145...

"G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net> wrote:

Well, they cannot intimidate my kids but many kids ARE intimidated.


Whereas they should merely be 'God-fearing', right?

Yes, everyone should "fear" God. You don't understand what that really means
so you'll twist that to mean something that it doesn't I'm sure.
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 02 Nov 2006 08:27:16 AM
"G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net> wrote:

Yes, everyone should "fear" God. You don't understand what that really
means so you'll twist that to mean something that it doesn't I'm sure.

If you don't mean it, don't say it.
.
User: "G-Net"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 02 Nov 2006 02:30:20 PM
"Midwinter" <midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns986F930F5B03ECYPMNDEXHBCJOIU@216.196.109.145...

"G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net> wrote:

Yes, everyone should "fear" God. You don't understand what that really
means so you'll twist that to mean something that it doesn't I'm sure.


If you don't mean it, don't say it.

I did mean it so I did say it.
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 03 Nov 2006 08:59:36 PM
"G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net> wrote:

Yes, everyone should "fear" God. You don't understand what that really
means so you'll twist that to mean something that it doesn't I'm sure.


If you don't mean it, don't say it.


I did mean it so I did say it.

Okay. So while you criticise teachers and professors for 'intimidating'
your kids, you would prefer your kids to be frightened of God. You said
it, so you must have meant it. No twisting required.
.





User: "Samuel W. Heywood"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 01 Nov 2006 01:50:02 PM
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, G-Net wrote:

"Samuel W. Heywood" <sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.62.0611011147380.1623@sdf.lonestar.org...

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, G-Net wrote:

Evolution is NOT "fact" it is the "THEORY of Evolution". I think that
teaching kids to "use their brains" is not a bad thing UNLESS it goes
against everything that they believe in the first place. I don't think
that forcing kids to swallow the evolution myth helps them in any way.


It is a proven fact that evolution happens. There are scientific
theories and also some very interesting religious opinions about
what causes evolution to happen. Your problem is that you don't
even accept the proven fact that evolution happens.


I don't believe that it is a "proven fact" that evolution happens at
all. Where are all of the mid-evolution species bones? Where is all
of this "proof" that folks keep talking about?

The truth is out there. Google for it and you will get pointed
to many of the right URL's.


I know for a fact how it causes problems and how it caused problems
for my own kids as well.


The learning of facts cannot cause problems for your kids, except in
the case of some kinds of facts which they should not learn about
until they are of the appropriate age. You know what kinds of facts
I am referring to. Most Christians do not consider the learning about
the fact that evolution happens to be among the kinds of facts that
they should not learn about until they are of an appropriate age.


I cannot say what "most Christians" do or do not want. What I do know is
that evolution is taught in schools as "fact" and it is not fact.

Most children love to hear stories and to read stories about dinosaurs
and mastodons and pterodactyls and all the little horses and other
pre-historic animals. The best and most popular children's books on
that subject are written from the point of view that evolution happens.
I do not know of any children's books on that subject which say anything
against the Bible or any Christian beliefs.


My kids are not 3 years old. I was not referring to nursery school
reading time. I was referring to public school and colleges.

Unless you sent your kids to a nursery school run by a fundamentalist
church they probably learned some of the facts of evolution before
they entered first grade in the public schools. Three year old
children are very interested in pre-historic animals and they like
to ask lots of questions about why there aren't very many of the
pre-historic species which have survived to the present day. When
you take them to a zoo they want you to show them the dinosaurs and
the woolly mammoths like the ones they have seen in their picture
books and in the cartoons that they watch.

Fortunately, we raised our kids to be individuals who stand up for
themselves. My kids have never hesitated to tell the teacher what
they think and why they think it and I have always backed them up.


Even college professors try to shove theories down the kids throats
as "fact",


No, they do not. They present facts as facts and theories as theories.
Theories are open for debate and discussion.


I disagree. I have a son in college and he would tell you a VERY
different story. I don't speak off hand, I know for a fact that it IS
jammed down kids throats.

Does it amaze you that teachers want their students to have knowledge
of the facts so that they won't make idiots of themseves by mouthing
off about their religious opinions which have been proven false?
There is nothing wrong with your kids' having religious opinions and
expressing them, but if they express the kinds of religious opinions
that are proven to them to be false, or if they refuse to even listen
to those who who can prove to them that their opinions are false, and
they persist in doggedly clinging to those false religious opinions,
then they will be held up to ridicule, and rightfully so.
There are many religious opinions that cannot be proven to be false,
but the one about how evolution doesn't happen is not one of those.

but like I said, kids who are raised to stand up for themselves are
not intimidated by college professors either.


Neither college professors nor public school teachers are allowed to
intimidate their students.

Well, they cannot intimidate my kids but many kids ARE intimidated.

They are not intimidated. They are just afraid to learn that some
of their religious opinions are wrong.

Conditioning them to reject out of hand anything not written down
in an ancient book authored and compiled thousands of years ago by
people without a fraction of the scientific knowledge currently
available *is* harming them, and potentially, through them, harming
others.


That's your opinion, I disagree completely. There is NO "scientific
knowledge currently available" that would in any way prove the Bible
incorrect. Many try to say that but it's never been true and it never
will be true. Christians aren't going away because God protects and keeps
us. Only when the rapture occurs will Christians not be around
and when that day comes, I pity those who remain...

Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62
.
User: "G-Net"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 01 Nov 2006 04:09:11 PM
"Samuel W. Heywood" <sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.62.0611011355420.11314@sdf.lonestar.org...

On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, G-Net wrote:

"Samuel W. Heywood" <sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote in message
news:Pine.NEB.4.62.0611011147380.1623@sdf.lonestar.org...

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, G-Net wrote:

Evolution is NOT "fact" it is the "THEORY of Evolution". I think that
teaching kids to "use their brains" is not a bad thing UNLESS it goes
against everything that they believe in the first place. I don't think
that forcing kids to swallow the evolution myth helps them in any way.


It is a proven fact that evolution happens. There are scientific
theories and also some very interesting religious opinions about
what causes evolution to happen. Your problem is that you don't
even accept the proven fact that evolution happens.


I don't believe that it is a "proven fact" that evolution happens at
all. Where are all of the mid-evolution species bones? Where is all
of this "proof" that folks keep talking about?


The truth is out there. Google for it and you will get pointed
to many of the right URL's.

No, I do not need to "google" for the truth because I already know the
truth.

I know for a fact how it causes problems and how it caused problems
for my own kids as well.


The learning of facts cannot cause problems for your kids, except in
the case of some kinds of facts which they should not learn about
until they are of the appropriate age. You know what kinds of facts
I am referring to. Most Christians do not consider the learning about
the fact that evolution happens to be among the kinds of facts that
they should not learn about until they are of an appropriate age.


I cannot say what "most Christians" do or do not want. What I do know is
that evolution is taught in schools as "fact" and it is not fact.

Most children love to hear stories and to read stories about dinosaurs
and mastodons and pterodactyls and all the little horses and other
pre-historic animals. The best and most popular children's books on
that subject are written from the point of view that evolution happens.
I do not know of any children's books on that subject which say anything
against the Bible or any Christian beliefs.


My kids are not 3 years old. I was not referring to nursery school
reading time. I was referring to public school and colleges.


Unless you sent your kids to a nursery school run by a fundamentalist
church they probably learned some of the facts of evolution before
they entered first grade in the public schools. Three year old
children are very interested in pre-historic animals and they like
to ask lots of questions about why there aren't very many of the
pre-historic species which have survived to the present day. When
you take them to a zoo they want you to show them the dinosaurs and
the woolly mammoths like the ones they have seen in their picture
books and in the cartoons that they watch.

Fortunately, we raised our kids to be individuals who stand up for
themselves. My kids have never hesitated to tell the teacher what
they think and why they think it and I have always backed them up.


Even college professors try to shove theories down the kids throats
as "fact",


No, they do not. They present facts as facts and theories as theories.
Theories are open for debate and discussion.


I disagree. I have a son in college and he would tell you a VERY
different story. I don't speak off hand, I know for a fact that it IS
jammed down kids throats.


Does it amaze you that teachers want their students to have knowledge
of the facts so that they won't make idiots of themseves by mouthing
off about their religious opinions which have been proven false?

It doesn't "amaze" me that a teacher would want my kids to know "facts" and
I
have no problem as long as they are "facts". My problem is with evolution
which
is not now and has never been, fact. This is the reason that they call it a
theory.
Gravity is not a theory, it is a fact thus they call it the law of gravity.

There is nothing wrong with your kids' having religious opinions and
expressing them, but if they express the kinds of religious opinions
that are proven to them to be false

I know of nothing scriptural that has "proven to be false". I know of some
passages
which some godless wonders try to say are "proven" false but none actually
exist.

, or if they refuse to even listen to those who who can prove to them that
their opinions are false, and they persist in doggedly clinging to those
false religious opinions, then they will be held up to ridicule, and
rightfully so.

Christians do not have "false religious opinions", only scripture facts.

There are many religious opinions that cannot be proven to be false,
but the one about how evolution doesn't happen is not one of those.

Your opinion, also not fact.

but like I said, kids who are raised to stand up for themselves are
not intimidated by college professors either.


Neither college professors nor public school teachers are allowed to
intimidate their students.


Well, they cannot intimidate my kids but many kids ARE intimidated.


They are not intimidated. They are just afraid to learn that some
of their religious opinions are wrong.

Lol, you just cannot accept the fact that there are people in the world who
are
not afraid to stand up for what they believe in, huh? You have to call them
afraid, stupid or some other name so you can dismiss them. Sorry, you are
dead wrong.

Conditioning them to reject out of hand anything not written down
in an ancient book authored and compiled thousands of years ago by
people without a fraction of the scientific knowledge currently
available *is* harming them, and potentially, through them, harming
others.


That's your opinion, I disagree completely. There is NO "scientific
knowledge currently available" that would in any way prove the Bible
incorrect. Many try to say that but it's never been true and it never
will be true. Christians aren't going away because God protects and
keeps
us. Only when the rapture occurs will Christians not be around
and when that day comes, I pity those who remain...


Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62

.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 01 Nov 2006 06:18:10 PM
"G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net> wrote:

No, I do not need to "google" for the truth because I already know the
truth.

You do not need to risk learning new things, because you already know
everything you could possibly need to know.
QED, pretty much.
.





User: "George Peatty"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 31 Oct 2006 03:50:55 PM
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:24:16 -0600, Midwinter <midwinter_m@hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

Teaching kids facts, backed up by solid observational data collected over
generations, which accurately predicts experimental results and explains
observed events, and encouraging those kids to critically analyse
information with which they are presented, does not in any sense constitute
'harming' them. Instead, it is simply teaching and encouraging them to use
the brains which nature - and by definition God, if such a being exists -
has provided them with.

Oh, bull. Most of what you believe you take on faith. All learning is
faith-based. Google and read the research of Michael Polanyi sometime ..
Further, I doubt that 1% of all accumulated knowledge can be supported
"solid observational data collected over generations, which accurately
predicts experimental results and explains observed events"

Conditioning them to reject out of hand anything not written down in an
ancient book authored and compiled thousands of years ago by people without
a fraction of the scientific knowledge currently available *is* harming
them, and potentially, through them, harming others.

We have more scientific knowledge than they did, but we know less. Few of
them would dispute either the existence of God, or that he is the author of
all that happens around them.
.
User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 31 Oct 2006 05:30:17 PM
George Peatty <peattyg47-1230@copper.net> wrote:

Oh, bull. Most of what you believe you take on faith.

That's what I love about these groups. They're so very black and white.
Last time I was involved in the faith-versus-science discussion I was
being slated by evolution advocates for being a religious nutter. Hey ho.
Okay, getting to the point:

All learning is faith-based.

The difference is that, with real learning, it would be feasible for me,
with the correct equipment and training, to make the observations myself,
repeat the experiments, and confirm the results. The key point here is
that scientific discoveries are not based on insistence and "because it
is", as Bible literalism is. Scientifically-obtained results are
independently verifiable by anyone wishing to test them, and they do not
require a prerequisite that one believes in a certain god or a certain
interpretation of that god.
The only reason religious fundamentalists as a group don't take the
trouble to confirm scientific data for themselves is because they are too
afraid they'd be able to.

We have more scientific knowledge than they did, but we know less.

A Biblical literalist position suggests that all the knowledge a person
could possibly want can be fitted between the covers of the Bible. This
is quite obviously not the case.

Few of them would dispute either the existence of God, or that he is
the author of all that happens around them.

Few scientists would dispute the existence of God, because whether He
exists or not is irrelevant to science. Unfortunately, that's something
that religious fundamentalists couldn't ever bring themselves to accept,
thus while science does not consider its purpose to be to disprove God,
such fundamentalists will inevitably view science with fear and distrust.
This is because their religion - such as it is - is based not on a faith
in the existence of God, but on a faith in the accuracy of the Bible
authors. Bible literalism is, essentially, the house built on sand.
.


User: "Midwinter"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 30 Oct 2006 04:16:52 PM
JEM <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote:

Although I am obviously typing a message directly to one person's
dialogue, I am not targeting any specific individual. Many people will
have their individual defenses or deflect certain statements because
it does not relate to them, does not apply, they disagree, whatever.
So if I am wrong about you personally midwinter please don't take too
much offense, I am trying to be part of the discussion but not trying
to convince people one by one, I'm not on a crusade of any sort or
interested in attacking individuals.

That's fine, I pretty much assumed that was your position. I appreciate
your making it clear, though - the biggest problem I have with some of the
more fervent anti-religion posters in here is their apparent apathy with
regard to the distinctions between various different kinds of religion.
It's something I notice a lot with Bill: many of his arguments, and the
apparent assumptions on which his arguments are based, seem to be rooted
in this idea that "religion" invariably equals a belief in a single male
creator God as described in the Bible/Torah/Koran. When I argue in
threads like this, it's usually also not because I want to convert people
in any way - but just because I want them to be a little more careful what
arguments they're advancing, and who they're advancing them towards.

I realize that there is little I
can say in opposition to religion that will not anger some.

Well, speaking personally, you can say what you like without angering me.
But I'd ask you to be specific about what aspect of religion you're
objecting to, because arguing against 'religion' to me seems a little like
arguing against 'art'. Not because I'm trying to imply that religion is
art, but because both terms encompass such a huge range of different ideas
and concepts that attacking them as a whole would require the clumsiest of
generalisations.

Anyway, the point I am trying to further is that if one belongs to a
faith that is involved in influencing or directly manipulating issues
that affect people detrimentally, to some degree each member of that
faith is responsible for allowing those practices to continue.

I'd agree, with reservations. Certainly an outsider might expect that
moderates within that faith should be doing something about it themselves
- but as other posters have suggested there might be numerous reasons why
they don't. Assuming that they're supporting what the militants are doing
essentially relies on the flawed idea that "if you're not with us, you're
against us". To a militant, the only acceptable worldview is his own. If
you share it, you're okay. If you don't, then whatever religion you might
say you follow or don't, you're his target. I've no doubt, as someone has
already suggested, that many Muslims are afraid - possibly more afraid
than anyone - of what so-called Islamic radicals might do to them.
I don't offer this as an excuse. I'm not a member of that particular
faith, so I can't. But I offer it (or rather, second it) as one of many
possible explanations.
Quite aside from that, there's not a great deal more similarity between
the Christians who sit in my parents church and George Bush's type; or
between raging jihadist and the Muslim who works on my team; than there is
between an atheist and any religious person. This is part of my problem
here: the assumption that everyone who labels themselves with the same
word *is* the same, and that they therefore share some sort of bond that
would enable them to have an influence over each other.

I can respect another's opinion on pretty much any topic and let them
be. I do not like when a small group forces their view of the world on
everybody.

Whether they are religious or not - I'd agree with you on this.

When the president of the usa thinks he was destined by god
to affect change in the world, that is dangerous.

Certainly. Even in the UK, a nation with a monarch, nobody seriously
imagines that the Queen is on the throne because it's God's will. Scratch
that - no rational person believes it. And although she still technically
has a great deal of power, realistically she'd never be able to use it.
Certainly the country wouldn't bow to an insistence that she's doing
"God's will". Her Majesty's position is generally ceremonial. So we - a
country with a 'Defender of the Faith' at our head - seem to be less
directly influenced by religion than a country with a constitutional
separation of Church and State.
(That said, our Prime Minister is starting to act a little too Christ-like
for my taste.)

into the mid-east are ideologically driven, along with oil.

Moreover, I think they're oil-driven and he justifies them to himself with
some cobbled-together ideology to convince himself he's right.

When religious groups are distorting the teaching of science in our
children's schools, like this ID folly, they are damaging their
education. We need to let children grow into critical thinkers, not
religious zealots bent on saving heathens for jesus or wiping out the
infidels.

Agreed. But again, I'd ask you to bear in mind that the religious groups
doing this are generally of one particular faith - and a minority sub-set
of that faith, at that (globally speaking). So attacking 'religion'
because Genesis-literalist Christian militants are trying to educate
children into ignorance is the sort of generalisation I usually question.

When groups are indoctrinating children in these jesus camps, they are
creating the same zealots we despise in the mid-east. Same thing,
different flavor.

Different flavour, yes - but again, your use of the name 'Jesus' is of
crucial significance here as far as I'm concerned.

Religious groups are often so unfailingly sure their way is the only
justifiable way on the planet

When that's the case, I oppose it. But because every angry religious
fundamentalist is religious, it doesn't follow that every religious person
is an angry religious fundamentalist.

Athiests by and large are not prone to organising as a group and
flexing political muscle, I realize they don't number very highly, but
I believe the numbers can only increase.

And that's fine, so long as they don't spend so much time hating a
particular group of people that they become another identical group.
Personally I don't think that's at all likely in the case of most atheists
- but when I see the way some of them flare up the moment they think
they've found a religionist to bait... Especially when they're so busy
deciding in their own minds what sort of person they're laying into that
they don't bother paying attention to what that person's actually saying.
I believe this is exactly the same kind of narrow-minded bigotry that's
exhibited by some of the religious militants here - the 'pastors' and the
'reverends', and so on. "If you're not for me, you're against me!" If
you're not an atheist, you're fundie Christian - or if you're not fundie
Christian, you're an atheist.
Sure, if people want to attack religion as a whole, then they can go to
it, and good luck to them. But I'll want them to explain to me, as a
religious person, exactly what it is about my religion that offends them
so - and if they start telling me about how my God did such-and-such in
the Bible, or what evil is done in the name of Jesus, then I'm going to
question them about whether they mean 'religion' or 'a specific religion'.
Incidentally, please don't take that as any sort of accusation directed
against yourself. It's a general cap, to be worn wherever it fits.

I am not interested in learning all the ins and outs of a million
little denominations, shapes-sizes-flavors-colors etc.
The big problems in my opinion is christianity, islam, and judaism.

Fine - but I follow none of these, and, as I said above, if what you're
attacking is 'religion', then you're attacking me here, and I think I have
the right to know precisely why.

I think one of the roots of our problems is the religion, more
specifically religious faith as a whole.

Then now, I'll have to ask you directly to tell me what it is about my
religion that you think causes social problems.

Christianity, Islam, Judaism - these faiths have violent
histories documented in violent books.

Include the present time.

I did [emphasis added]:

But our species has lived through
violent times - *** a few even more violent than our current place in
history *** - so perhaps this shouldn't be too surprising.

Yes, it's a personal relationship with god and all that, fine, until
their fellow believers cause serious problems for others, then it's
personally everybody's busines.

We agree on this point - but this does not represent the majority of
cases, and therefore it's questionable to declare that 'religion' is to
blame.

Personally, I think external pressure is necessary.

You may be right. But all I ask is that we apply that pressure carefully
where it *needs to be*, and not just wildly at anything we can see.
Poetry not intended. :o)
.

User: "Samuel W. Heywood"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 29 Oct 2006 07:52:27 AM
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, JEM wrote:
<snip>

There are lots of beliefs that do not harm others, abrahamic religion
is not among those.

If one belongs to a religion of the Abrahamic faith traditions and he
practices it according to its *legitimate* teachings he will do no
harm to others.
Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62
.
User: "JEM"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 29 Oct 2006 05:31:57 PM
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:52:27 -0500, "Samuel W. Heywood"
<sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, JEM wrote:

<snip>

There are lots of beliefs that do not harm others, abrahamic religion
is not among those.


If one belongs to a religion of the Abrahamic faith traditions and he
practices it according to its *legitimate* teachings he will do no
harm to others.

Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62

I appreciate your sentiment, but I can only agree with you if the
nasty half of their texts are purged.
Their books do have a lot of evil things, like stoning people for
stuff we all(all modern rational people anyway) think is
insignificant, or not worthy of a death sentence or even punishment.
If by legitimate you mean the positive things, then that's cool.
The muslims and their beheadings and honor killing and all that *****,
they are just more faithful to their dogma than christians, but they
have many similar stupidities.
.
User: "G-Net"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 30 Oct 2006 07:26:13 AM
"JEM" <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:07eak2d6udm7bocdpj3kr8537u5uq2f6tq@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:52:27 -0500, "Samuel W. Heywood"
<sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, JEM wrote:

<snip>

There are lots of beliefs that do not harm others, abrahamic religion
is not among those.


If one belongs to a religion of the Abrahamic faith traditions and he
practices it according to its *legitimate* teachings he will do no
harm to others.

Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62


I appreciate your sentiment, but I can only agree with you if the
nasty half of their texts are purged.
Their books do have a lot of evil things, like stoning people for
stuff we all(all modern rational people anyway) think is
insignificant, or not worthy of a death sentence or even punishment.
If by legitimate you mean the positive things, then that's cool.
The muslims and their beheadings and honor killing and all that *****,
they are just more faithful to their dogma than christians, but they
have many similar stupidities.

If you think that the Bible says that we are to stone anyone, behead them,
OR
punish them in anyway, then you are incorrect. Unbelievers try to justify
their
obvious hatred for God and "religion" under the guise that Christianity
breeds
violence, bigotry, etc. There is absolutely no truth in that whatsoever.
While I
cannot say that there may not have been people who attempted to justify
their sin by claiming that God supposedly told them, it's a lie from the
start.
Things may have been different before Jesus came, but they certainly
changed after. This was one of the reasons that Jesus came in the first
place,
to end the old covenant, the old law, the old ways and replace them with the
new covenant. Mankind didn't handle the old covenant very well and I'm
afraid he's not doing very well with the new covenant either.
People who lack any sort of biblical knowledge always zero in on the old
testament and talk about all of the supposed "atrocities" that exist there.
They use the old testament as a basis for their religious bigotry. What they
forget about is that the old testament is NOT a rule book and in many
cases is there only for historical record. We are not under the law anymore
and haven't been under the law for over 2000 years. We are under the new
covenant.
.
User: "JEM"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 30 Oct 2006 04:49:46 PM
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:26:13 GMT, "G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net>
wrote:

"JEM" <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:07eak2d6udm7bocdpj3kr8537u5uq2f6tq@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:52:27 -0500, "Samuel W. Heywood"
<sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, JEM wrote:

<snip>

There are lots of beliefs that do not harm others, abrahamic religion
is not among those.


If one belongs to a religion of the Abrahamic faith traditions and he
practices it according to its *legitimate* teachings he will do no
harm to others.

Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62


I appreciate your sentiment, but I can only agree with you if the
nasty half of their texts are purged.
Their books do have a lot of evil things, like stoning people for
stuff we all(all modern rational people anyway) think is
insignificant, or not worthy of a death sentence or even punishment.
If by legitimate you mean the positive things, then that's cool.
The muslims and their beheadings and honor killing and all that *****,
they are just more faithful to their dogma than christians, but they
have many similar stupidities.


If you think that the Bible says that we are to stone anyone, behead them,
OR
punish them in anyway, then you are incorrect.

Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:
If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave
dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be
punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is
his property.
Exodus Chapter 21, verse 32:
If the bull gores a male or female slave, the owner must pay
thirty shekels of silver to the master of the slave, and the bull must
be stoned.
1 Corinthians chapter 14:
As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain
silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in
submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something,
they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for
a woman to speak in the church.
1 Corinthians 11 :
But I want you to understand that the head of every man is
Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is
God. Any man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors
his head, but any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled
dishonors her head--it is the same as if her head were shaven. For if
a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut off her hair; but
if it is disgraceful for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her wear a
veil. For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and
glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. (For man was not made
from woman, but woman from man. Neither was man created for woman, but
woman for man.) That is why a woman ought to have a veil on her head,
because of the angels.
1 Timothy chapter 2:
Also that women should adorn themselves modestly and sensibly in
seemly apparel, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly
attire but by good deeds, as befits women who profess religion. Let a
woman learn in silence with all submissiveness. I permit no woman to
teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
In Deuteronomy 22:28-29 :
"If a man meets a virgin who is not engaged, and seizes her and lies
with her, and they are caught in the act, the man who lay with her
shall give fifty shekels of silver to the young woman’s father, and
she shall become his wife. Because he violated her he shall not be
permitted to divorce her as long as he lives."
In Numbers 31:14-18:
"Moses was angry with the officers of the army—the commanders of
thousands and commanders of hundreds—who returned from the battle.
"Have you allowed all the women to live?" he asked them. "They were
the ones who followed Balaam's advice and were the means of turning
the Israelites away from the LORD in what happened at Peor, so that a
plague struck the LORD's people. Now kill all the boys. And kill every
woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who
has never slept with a man."
book of Matthew, chapter 2:
And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with
Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had
opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and
frankincense and myrrh. And being warned of God in a dream that they
should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country
another way. And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the
Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young
child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I
bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him.
When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and
departed into Egypt: And was there until the death of Herod: that it
might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet,
saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son. Then Herod, when he saw
that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent
forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all
the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the
time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men. Then was
fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, In Rama
was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning,
Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because
they are not.
Exodus chapter 12 verse 28:
So the people of Israel did just as the LORD had commanded through
Moses and Aaron. And at midnight the LORD killed all the firstborn
sons in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn son of Pharaoh, who sat
on the throne, to the firstborn son of the captive in the dungeon.
Even the firstborn of their livestock were killed. Pharaoh and his
officials and all the people of Egypt woke up during the night, and
loud wailing was heard throughout the land of Egypt. There was not a
single house where someone had not died.
Isaiah chapter 13:
Anyone who is captured will be run through with a sword. Their little
children will be dashed to death right before their eyes. Their homes
will be sacked and their wives raped by the attacking hordes. For I
will stir up the Medes against Babylon, and no amount of silver or
gold will buy them off. The attacking armies will shoot down the young
people with arrows. They will have no mercy on helpless babies and
will show no compassion for the children.
Jeremiah chapter 49, verse 20:
Therefore hear the plan which the LORD has made against Edom and the
purposes which he has formed against the inhabitants of Teman: Even
the little ones of the flock shall be dragged away; surely their fold
shall be appalled at their fate. At the sound of their fall the earth
shall tremble; the sound of their cry shall be heard at the Red Sea.
Hosea chapter 13:
Samaria shall bear her guilt, because she has rebelled against her
God; they shall fall by the sword, their little ones shall be dashed
in pieces, and their pregnant women ripped open.
Numbers chapter 31
Moses said to them, "Have you let all the women live? Behold, these
caused the people of Israel, by the counsel of Balaam, to act
treacherously against the LORD in the matter of Pe'or, and so the
plague came among the congregation of the LORD. Now therefore, kill
every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known
man by lying with him. But all the young girls who have not known man
by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
Deuteronomy Chapter 3:
Next we turned and went up along the road toward Bashan, and Og king
of Bashan with his whole army marched out to meet us in battle at
Edrei. The LORD said to me, "Do not be afraid of him, for I have
handed him over to you with his whole army and his land. Do to him
what you did to Sihon king of the Amorites, who reigned in Heshbon."
So the LORD our God also gave into our hands Og king of Bashan and all
his army. We struck them down, leaving no survivors. At that time we
took all his cities. There was not one of the sixty cities that we did
not take from them—the whole region of Argob, Og's kingdom in Bashan.
All these cities were fortified with high walls and with gates and
bars, and there were also a great many unwalled villages. We
completely destroyed them, as we had done with Sihon king of Heshbon,
destroying every city—men, women and children. But all the livestock
and the plunder from their cities we carried off for ourselves.
Judges Chapter 4
But Jael, Heber's wife, picked up a tent peg and a hammer and
went quietly to him while he lay fast asleep, exhausted. She drove the
peg through his temple into the ground, and he died.
Genesis Chapter 38
Then Judah said to Onan, "Lie with your brother's wife and
fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to produce offspring for
your brother." But Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so
whenever he lay with his brother's wife, he spilled his semen on the
ground to keep from producing offspring for his brother. What he did
was wicked in the Lord 's sight; so he put him to death also.
Judges Chapter 3
Ehud then approached him [the fat king] while he was sitting
alone in the upper room of his summer palace and said, "I have a
message from God for you." As the king rose from his seat, Ehud
reached with his left hand, drew the sword from his right thigh and
plunged it into the king's belly. Even the handle sank in after the
blade, which came out his back. Ehud did not pull the sword out, and
the fat closed in over it. Then Ehud went out to the porch; he shut
the doors of the upper room behind him and locked them.
Judges Chapter 19
But the men would not listen to him. So the man took his
concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused
her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go. At daybreak the
woman went back to the house where her master was staying, fell down
at the door and lay there until daylight.
When her master got up in the morning and opened the door of the
house and stepped out to continue on his way, there lay his concubine,
fallen in the doorway of the house, with her hands on the threshold.
He said to her, "Get up; let's go." But there was no answer. Then the
man put her on his donkey and set out for home.
When he reached home, he took a knife and cut up his concubine,
limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of
Israel. Everyone who saw it said, "Such a thing has never been seen or
done, not since the day the Israelites came up out of Egypt. Think
about it! Consider it! Tell us what to do!"
Joshua Chapter 10
When they had brought these kings to Joshua, he summoned all the
men of Israel and said to the army commanders who had come with him,
"Come here and put your feet on the necks of these kings." So they
came forward and placed their feet on their necks.
Joshua said to them, "Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged.
Be strong and courageous. This is what the Lord will do to all the
enemies you are going to fight." Then Joshua struck and killed the
kings and hung them on five trees, and they were left hanging on the
trees until evening.
Numbers Chapter 31
Moses was angry with the officers of the army-the commanders of
thousands and commanders of hundreds-who returned from the battle.
"Have you allowed all the women to live?" he asked them. "They were
the ones who followed Balaam's advice and were the means of turning
the Israelites away from the Lord in what happened at Peor, so that a
plague struck the Lord 's people. Now kill all the boys. And kill
every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every
girl who has never slept with a man."
Deuteronomy Chapter 25
If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to
rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes
him by his private parts, you shall cut off her hand. Show her no
pity.
Leviticus 21:17:
Say to Aaron, None of your descendants throughout their
generations who has a blemish may approach to offer the bread of his
God. For no one who has a blemish shall draw near, a man blind or
lame, or one who has a mutilated face or a limb too long, or a man who
has an injured foot or an injured hand, or a hunchback, or a dwarf, or
a man with a defect in his sight or an itching disease or scabs or
crushed testicles; no man of the descendants of Aaron the priest who
has a blemish shall come near to offer the LORD's offerings by fire;
since he has a blemish, he shall not come near to offer the bread of
his God. He may eat the bread of his God, both of the most holy and of
the holy things, but he shall not come near the veil or approach the
altar, because he has a blemish, that he may not profane my
sanctuaries; for I am the LORD who sanctify them.
These are from your beloved bible. Had enough? I can find more, but I
don't think your addled brain will grow with a hundred examples like
this.
Just for fun lets summarize.
Treating women in a humiliating fashion is ok.
Slavery is ok.
Human life is 30 shekels.
Rape is ok.
Killing babies and kids is ok.
Killing women is ok.
Killing anyone that offends you or god is ok.
Discriminating against birth defects, handicapped and blemished people
is ok.
Here is one my top ten faves....
Deuteronomy Chapter 21:18, the Bible says:
If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who does not obey his
father and mother and will not listen to them when they discipline
him, his father and mother shall take hold of him and bring him to the
elders at the gate of his town. They shall say to the elders, "This
son of ours is stubborn and rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a
profligate and a drunkard." Then all the men of his town shall stone
him to death. You must purge the evil from among you. All Israel will
hear of it and be afraid.
So it's ok to stone your own son to death because he's lazy and
drinks.
Have I obliterated the ***** out of your first sentence well enough?
Have you actually read your bible with open eyes?
Have you actually thought this book through?
Can you seriously believe that this twisted piece of work could
possibly be the word of god? If you believe that, then read the thng
and ask yourself if you could knowingly follow this perverse being?
Next you can start researching how this book was actually put
together. When were certain parts were written, which parts were
altered, which parts were mistranslated, who wrote what.
Read about how the fabulous early christians mastered the art of
wiping out entire villages, killing and suppressing anything that
intellectually competed.
They musta killed a lot of people because they did not exactly have a
well written bokk, a good story, or a whits worth in it anywhere.
There had to be a lot of better philosophies that didn't survive those
murderous bastards.
That is apart from the fact that the bible is chocked full of
irrelevant babble.
It's myth from 20 and 30 centuries ago.
As for a historical record, it's the most ***** ever put in one
book. The worst part is that people take is seriously as a record, and
as a guide.
So read it, go get a slave, beat it up but just enough not to kill
him,
don't pay more than 30 shekels for a human, after all the permanent
word of god is law so there is no inflation.
Good luck finding a bank to tell you what 30 shekels is worth by the
way.
You can treat your wife like *****, no problem god will still love you,
you're the man!
Hey, if you got enemies, make sure to kill all the babies and
children, and all the women that have had sex, kill them too, and keep
the virgins for yourself, you know what to do with a virgin don't you?
Ya that's right, you know, you're the man.
If your concubine ain't what she should be, remember, 12 pieces is the
right way to dice her up. Spread her around real good.
Are you getting any of this?
Who needs random voices in their head to tell them to do all this
*****, you got it straight from god.
Secondly,
jesus was a spiritual being, not flesh at all for over a hundred years
after he supposedly died. Spirit. Did you know there were guys named
jesus then like there are guys named joe now? They couldn't even pick
a unique name for him.
If some of those people that wrote this thing could see you now, they
would be so proud.
First they wrote a death for him, sprinkle in a ressurrection, ya like
that old myth umm, no matter they forget that old stuff we'll add a
spicy last 3 years of his life, and oh, next lets write a great birth
scene. I want it in a cozy inn, no better yet a MANGER,make it a
virgin birth, no sex that's just dirty this guy is special. ya ya ya
just like the other myths, but we will present this with swords drawn
they will love it! ya, talk about humble beginnings who wouldn't love
that baby, have some magical guests show up, hmmm, guided by a star
that's the ticket.... where should this happen... um, lets pretend
nazarite, nazarootie, oh what's that new town.... nazareth that's it.
Don't worry nobody will check that it didn't exist 100 years ago, they
haven't invented good civic record keeping yet, nobody will spot this
stuff.
I don't hate the bible or you, I wonder why you believe this tripe and
walk away.
But I'm looking over my shoulder in case you try to smite me, I don't
wanna be smote.
Go preach to someone who is gullible enough to take it in and not
smack you for it.
I really hope you can't find anybody. To believe you I mean.

Unbelievers try to justify
their
obvious hatred for God and "religion" under the guise that Christianity
breeds
violence, bigotry, etc. There is absolutely no truth in that whatsoever.
While I
cannot say that there may not have been people who attempted to justify
their sin by claiming that God supposedly told them, it's a lie from the
start.
Things may have been different before Jesus came, but they certainly
changed after. This was one of the reasons that Jesus came in the first
place,
to end the old covenant, the old law, the old ways and replace them with the
new covenant. Mankind didn't handle the old covenant very well and I'm
afraid he's not doing very well with the new covenant either.

People who lack any sort of biblical knowledge always zero in on the old
testament and talk about all of the supposed "atrocities" that exist there.
They use the old testament as a basis for their religious bigotry. What they
forget about is that the old testament is NOT a rule book and in many
cases is there only for historical record. We are not under the law anymore
and haven't been under the law for over 2000 years. We are under the new
covenant.

.
User: "G-Net"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 30 Oct 2006 05:55:33 PM
"JEM" <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:e7sck25mqgknls11mmpa2irdvtivi4k6c9@4ax.com...

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:26:13 GMT, "G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net>
wrote:

"JEM" <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:07eak2d6udm7bocdpj3kr8537u5uq2f6tq@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:52:27 -0500, "Samuel W. Heywood"
<sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, JEM wrote:

<snip>

There are lots of beliefs that do not harm others, abrahamic religion
is not among those.


If one belongs to a religion of the Abrahamic faith traditions and he
practices it according to its *legitimate* teachings he will do no
harm to others.

Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62


I appreciate your sentiment, but I can only agree with you if the
nasty half of their texts are purged.
Their books do have a lot of evil things, like stoning people for
stuff we all(all modern rational people anyway) think is
insignificant, or not worthy of a death sentence or even punishment.
If by legitimate you mean the positive things, then that's cool.
The muslims and their beheadings and honor killing and all that *****,
they are just more faithful to their dogma than christians, but they
have many similar stupidities.


If you think that the Bible says that we are to stone anyone, behead them,
OR punish them in anyway, then you are incorrect.


Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:
If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave
dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be
punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is
his property.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Exodus Chapter 21, verse 32:
If the bull gores a male or female slave, the owner must pay
thirty shekels of silver to the master of the slave, and the bull must
be stoned.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

1 Corinthians chapter 14:
As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain
silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in
submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something,
they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for
a woman to speak in the church.

NEW TESTAMENT - Says nothing about beheading, beating, or otherwise
physically harming anyone.

1 Corinthians 11 :
But I want you to understand that the head of every man is
Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is
God. Any man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors
his head, but any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled
dishonors her head--it is the same as if her head were shaven. For if
a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut off her hair; but
if it is disgraceful for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her wear a
veil. For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and
glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. (For man was not made
from woman, but woman from man. Neither was man created for woman, but
woman for man.) That is why a woman ought to have a veil on her head,
because of the angels.

NEW TESTAMENT - Says nothing about beheading, beating, or otherwise
physically harming anyone.

1 Timothy chapter 2:
Also that women should adorn themselves modestly and sensibly in
seemly apparel, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly
attire but by good deeds, as befits women who profess religion. Let a
woman learn in silence with all submissiveness. I permit no woman to
teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.

NEW TESTAMENT - Says nothing about beheading, beating, or otherwise
physically harming anyone.

In Deuteronomy 22:28-29 :
"If a man meets a virgin who is not engaged, and seizes her and lies
with her, and they are caught in the act, the man who lay with her
shall give fifty shekels of silver to the young woman's father, and
she shall become his wife. Because he violated her he shall not be
permitted to divorce her as long as he lives."

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

In Numbers 31:14-18:
"Moses was angry with the officers of the army-the commanders of
thousands and commanders of hundreds-who returned from the battle.
"Have you allowed all the women to live?" he asked them. "They were
the ones who followed Balaam's advice and were the means of turning
the Israelites away from the LORD in what happened at Peor, so that a
plague struck the LORD's people. Now kill all the boys. And kill every
woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who
has never slept with a man."

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

book of Matthew, chapter 2:
And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with
Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had
opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and
frankincense and myrrh. And being warned of God in a dream that they
should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country
another way. And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the
Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young
child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I
bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him.
When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and
departed into Egypt: And was there until the death of Herod: that it
might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet,
saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son. Then Herod, when he saw
that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent
forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all
the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the
time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men. Then was
fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, In Rama
was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning,
Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because
they are not.

Exodus chapter 12 verse 28:
So the people of Israel did just as the LORD had commanded through
Moses and Aaron. And at midnight the LORD killed all the firstborn
sons in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn son of Pharaoh, who sat
on the throne, to the firstborn son of the captive in the dungeon.
Even the firstborn of their livestock were killed. Pharaoh and his
officials and all the people of Egypt woke up during the night, and
loud wailing was heard throughout the land of Egypt. There was not a
single house where someone had not died.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Isaiah chapter 13:
Anyone who is captured will be run through with a sword. Their little
children will be dashed to death right before their eyes. Their homes
will be sacked and their wives raped by the attacking hordes. For I
will stir up the Medes against Babylon, and no amount of silver or
gold will buy them off. The attacking armies will shoot down the young
people with arrows. They will have no mercy on helpless babies and
will show no compassion for the children.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Jeremiah chapter 49, verse 20:
Therefore hear the plan which the LORD has made against Edom and the
purposes which he has formed against the inhabitants of Teman: Even
the little ones of the flock shall be dragged away; surely their fold
shall be appalled at their fate. At the sound of their fall the earth
shall tremble; the sound of their cry shall be heard at the Red Sea.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Hosea chapter 13:
Samaria shall bear her guilt, because she has rebelled against her
God; they shall fall by the sword, their little ones shall be dashed
in pieces, and their pregnant women ripped open.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Numbers chapter 31
Moses said to them, "Have you let all the women live? Behold, these
caused the people of Israel, by the counsel of Balaam, to act
treacherously against the LORD in the matter of Pe'or, and so the
plague came among the congregation of the LORD. Now therefore, kill
every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known
man by lying with him. But all the young girls who have not known man
by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Deuteronomy Chapter 3:
Next we turned and went up along the road toward Bashan, and Og king
of Bashan with his whole army marched out to meet us in battle at
Edrei. The LORD said to me, "Do not be afraid of him, for I have
handed him over to you with his whole army and his land. Do to him
what you did to Sihon king of the Amorites, who reigned in Heshbon."
So the LORD our God also gave into our hands Og king of Bashan and all
his army. We struck them down, leaving no survivors. At that time we
took all his cities. There was not one of the sixty cities that we did
not take from them-the whole region of Argob, Og's kingdom in Bashan.
All these cities were fortified with high walls and with gates and
bars, and there were also a great many unwalled villages. We
completely destroyed them, as we had done with Sihon king of Heshbon,
destroying every city-men, women and children. But all the livestock
and the plunder from their cities we carried off for ourselves.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Judges Chapter 4
But Jael, Heber's wife, picked up a tent peg and a hammer and
went quietly to him while he lay fast asleep, exhausted. She drove the
peg through his temple into the ground, and he died.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Genesis Chapter 38
Then Judah said to Onan, "Lie with your brother's wife and
fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to produce offspring for
your brother." But Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so
whenever he lay with his brother's wife, he spilled his semen on the
ground to keep from producing offspring for his brother. What he did
was wicked in the Lord 's sight; so he put him to death also.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Judges Chapter 3
Ehud then approached him [the fat king] while he was sitting
alone in the upper room of his summer palace and said, "I have a
message from God for you." As the king rose from his seat, Ehud
reached with his left hand, drew the sword from his right thigh and
plunged it into the king's belly. Even the handle sank in after the
blade, which came out his back. Ehud did not pull the sword out, and
the fat closed in over it. Then Ehud went out to the porch; he shut
the doors of the upper room behind him and locked them.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Judges Chapter 19
But the men would not listen to him. So the man took his
concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused
her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go. At daybreak the
woman went back to the house where her master was staying, fell down
at the door and lay there until daylight.
When her master got up in the morning and opened the door of the
house and stepped out to continue on his way, there lay his concubine,
fallen in the doorway of the house, with her hands on the threshold.
He said to her, "Get up; let's go." But there was no answer. Then the
man put her on his donkey and set out for home.

When he reached home, he took a knife and cut up his concubine,
limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of
Israel. Everyone who saw it said, "Such a thing has never been seen or
done, not since the day the Israelites came up out of Egypt. Think
about it! Consider it! Tell us what to do!"

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Joshua Chapter 10
When they had brought these kings to Joshua, he summoned all the
men of Israel and said to the army commanders who had come with him,
"Come here and put your feet on the necks of these kings." So they
came forward and placed their feet on their necks.

Joshua said to them, "Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged.
Be strong and courageous. This is what the Lord will do to all the
enemies you are going to fight." Then Joshua struck and killed the
kings and hung them on five trees, and they were left hanging on the
trees until evening.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Numbers Chapter 31
Moses was angry with the officers of the army-the commanders of
thousands and commanders of hundreds-who returned from the battle.
"Have you allowed all the women to live?" he asked them. "They were
the ones who followed Balaam's advice and were the means of turning
the Israelites away from the Lord in what happened at Peor, so that a
plague struck the Lord 's people. Now kill all the boys. And kill
every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every
girl who has never slept with a man."

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Deuteronomy Chapter 25
If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to
rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes
him by his private parts, you shall cut off her hand. Show her no
pity.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Leviticus 21:17:
Say to Aaron, None of your descendants throughout their
generations who has a blemish may approach to offer the bread of his
God. For no one who has a blemish shall draw near, a man blind or
lame, or one who has a mutilated face or a limb too long, or a man who
has an injured foot or an injured hand, or a hunchback, or a dwarf, or
a man with a defect in his sight or an itching disease or scabs or
crushed testicles; no man of the descendants of Aaron the priest who
has a blemish shall come near to offer the LORD's offerings by fire;
since he has a blemish, he shall not come near to offer the bread of
his God. He may eat the bread of his God, both of the most holy and of
the holy things, but he shall not come near the veil or approach the
altar, because he has a blemish, that he may not profane my
sanctuaries; for I am the LORD who sanctify them.

These are from your beloved bible. Had enough? I can find more, but I
don't think your addled brain will grow with a hundred examples like
this.
Just for fun lets summarize.
Treating women in a humiliating fashion is ok.
Slavery is ok.
Human life is 30 shekels.
Rape is ok.
Killing babies and kids is ok.
Killing women is ok.
Killing anyone that offends you or god is ok.
Discriminating against birth defects, handicapped and blemished people
is ok.
Here is one my top ten faves....

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Deuteronomy Chapter 21:18, the Bible says:

If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who does not obey his
father and mother and will not listen to them when they discipline
him, his father and mother shall take hold of him and bring him to the
elders at the gate of his town. They shall say to the elders, "This
son of ours is stubborn and rebellious. He will not obey us. He is a
profligate and a drunkard." Then all the men of his town shall stone
him to death. You must purge the evil from among you. All Israel will
hear of it and be afraid.

So it's ok to stone your own son to death because he's lazy and
drinks.

OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Have I obliterated the ***** out of your first sentence well enough?

No, you have only proven your complete ignorance of scripture.

Have you actually read your bible with open eyes?

Yeah, you apparently have not though. If you had you wouldn't quote passages
which first off, never applied to gentiles, and secondly are not applicable
now in
the way you seem to want to imply.

Have you actually thought this book through?

Sure, have you?

Can you seriously believe that this twisted piece of work could
possibly be the word of god? If you believe that, then read the thng
and ask yourself if you could knowingly follow this perverse being?

God is not perverse, mankind is.

Next you can start researching how this book was actually put
together. When were certain parts were written, which parts were
altered, which parts were mistranslated, who wrote what.
Read about how the fabulous early christians mastered the art of
wiping out entire villages, killing and suppressing anything that
intellectually competed.
They musta killed a lot of people because they did not exactly have a
well written bokk, a good story, or a whits worth in it anywhere.
There had to be a lot of better philosophies that didn't survive those
murderous bastards.

That is apart from the fact that the bible is chocked full of
irrelevant babble.
It's myth from 20 and 30 centuries ago.
As for a historical record, it's the most ***** ever put in one
book. The worst part is that people take is seriously as a record, and
as a guide.

So read it, go get a slave, beat it up but just enough not to kill
him, don't pay more than 30 shekels for a human, after all the
permanent word of god is law so there is no inflation.
Good luck finding a bank to tell you what 30 shekels is worth by the
way.
You can treat your wife like *****, no problem god will still love you,
you're the man!

That is not true. That is an atheists excuse to hate Christians.

Hey, if you got enemies, make sure to kill all the babies and
children, and all the women that have had sex, kill them too, and keep
the virgins for yourself, you know what to do with a virgin don't you?
Ya that's right, you know, you're the man.
If your concubine ain't what she should be, remember, 12 pieces is the
right way to dice her up. Spread her around real good.

Are you getting any of this?

Getting any of what, you're rather perverted ideas? Your lack of scriptural
knowledge? Your inability to understand anything of God?

Who needs random voices in their head to tell them to do all this
*****, you got it straight from god.

Neither God nor His word has ever told me to do any of the nonsense that
you have eluded to.

Secondly, jesus was a spiritual being, not flesh at all for over a hundred
years
after he supposedly died. Spirit. Did you know there were guys named
jesus then like there are guys named joe now? They couldn't even pick
a unique name for him.

You're point is???

If some of those people that wrote this thing could see you now, they
would be so proud.

So?

First they wrote a death for him, sprinkle in a ressurrection, ya like
that old myth umm, no matter they forget that old stuff we'll add a
spicy last 3 years of his life, and oh, next lets write a great birth
scene. I want it in a cozy inn, no better yet a MANGER,make it a
virgin birth, no sex that's just dirty this guy is special. ya ya ya
just like the other myths, but we will present this with swords drawn
they will love it! ya, talk about humble beginnings who wouldn't love
that baby, have some magical guests show up, hmmm, guided by a star
that's the ticket.... where should this happen... um, lets pretend
nazarite, nazarootie, oh what's that new town.... nazareth that's it.
Don't worry nobody will check that it didn't exist 100 years ago, they
haven't invented good civic record keeping yet, nobody will spot this
stuff.

Your version of things, not mine.

I don't hate the bible or you, I wonder why you believe this tripe and
walk away.

I don't believe "tripe" either, I believe in God and the Bible.

But I'm looking over my shoulder in case you try to smite me, I don't
wanna be smote.

A Christian does not smite anyone. Many however like myself, will defend
themselves.

Go preach to someone who is gullible enough to take it in and not
smack you for it.

If someone would "smack" me, I'd defend myself appropriately. I may
be a Christian but I'm not a door mat.

I really hope you can't find anybody. To believe you I mean.

Doesn't matter to me who does or does not believe me.

Unbelievers try to justify their obvious hatred for God and "religion"
under the guise that Christianity breeds violence, bigotry, etc.
There is absolutely no truth in that whatsoever.
While Icannot say that there may not have been people who attempted
to justify their sin by claiming that God supposedly told them, it's a lie
from the start.
Things may have been different before Jesus came, but they certainly
changed after. This was one of the reasons that Jesus came in the first
place,
to end the old covenant, the old law, the old ways and replace them with
the
new covenant. Mankind didn't handle the old covenant very well and I'm
afraid he's not doing very well with the new covenant either.

People who lack any sort of biblical knowledge always zero in on the old
testament and talk about all of the supposed "atrocities" that exist
there.
They use the old testament as a basis for their religious bigotry. What
they
forget about is that the old testament is NOT a rule book and in many
cases is there only for historical record. We are not under the law
anymore
and haven't been under the law for over 2000 years. We are under the new
covenant.

.
User: "JEM"

Title: Re: THE GOD CHALLENGE 30 Oct 2006 06:29:26 PM
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:55:33 GMT, "G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net>
wrote:
Jesus orders Christians to follow the Old Testament's laws:
Matthew 5:17 (King James Version)
5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I
am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot
or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be
fulfilled.
5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments,
and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of
heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be
called great in the kingdom of heaven.
this was where jesus was preaching to his disciples "up into a
mountain", and if he is your lord god then you are supposed to follow
his direct orders and obey the old laws, and you knew all this before
I did didn't you. Your skill with working the scriptures is admirable.
I am impressed, but tell me why you say you do not have to follow the
old testament when in the new testament jesus himself is saying you
have to abide by the laws of the old testament.
I am sure you can whip up some more scrpiture to prove the opposite of
my point, and you are thus proving that the whole set of books is
pretty worthless.
It is the amazing twistable truth you got, go twist it on me again.

"JEM" <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:e7sck25mqgknls11mmpa2irdvtivi4k6c9@4ax.com...

On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:26:13 GMT, "G-Net" <netnerve@verizon.net>
wrote:

"JEM" <A0054883@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:07eak2d6udm7bocdpj3kr8537u5uq2f6tq@4ax.com...

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 08:52:27 -0500, "Samuel W. Heywood"
<sheywood@MyRealBox.com> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, JEM wrote:

<snip>

There are lots of beliefs that do not harm others, abrahamic religion
is not among those.


If one belongs to a religion of the Abrahamic faith traditions and he
practices it according to its *legitimate* teachings he will do no
harm to others.

Sam Heywood
-- Message handled by Pine, Version 4.62


I appreciate your sentiment, but I can only agree with you if the
nasty half of their texts are purged.
Their books do have a lot of evil things, like stoning people for
stuff we all(all modern rational people anyway) think is
insignificant, or not worthy of a death sentence or even punishment.
If by legitimate you mean the positive things, then that's cool.
The muslims and their beheadings and honor killing and all that *****,
they are just more faithful to their dogma than christians, but they
have many similar stupidities.


If you think that the Bible says that we are to stone anyone, behead them,
OR punish them in anyway, then you are incorrect.


Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:
If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave
dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be
punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is
his property.


OLD TESTAMENT - Not applicable now. This was never applicable to gentiles.

Exodus Chapter 21, verse 32:
If the bull gores a male or female slave, the owner must pay
thirty shekels of silver to the master of the slave, and the bull must
be stoned.