Religions > Bible > The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Codebreaker" |
| Date: |
21 Aug 2007 05:42:21 PM |
| Object: |
The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
.
|
|
| User: "bob young" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
22 Aug 2007 04:33:01 AM |
|
|
Codebreaker wrote:
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Moses was a liar and a charlatan as are all prophets.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 10:05:26 PM |
|
|
On Aug 21, 3:42 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Sorry bubba, but Christianity is based on th New Testament - not on
the wacky Old Testament.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
22 Aug 2007 09:43:27 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:05:26 -0700, wrote:
On Aug 21, 3:42 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Sorry bubba, but Christianity is based on th New Testament - not on
the wacky Old Testament.
The New Testament is an explanation of
the Old Testament.
--
A liberal is someone who will give away everything
except his/her own possessions.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Leo Pardin" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 10:24:12 PM |
|
|
On Aug 21, 5:42 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
Christianity is grounded on the teachings of Jesus; it was only later
corrupted by the followers of Mosaic law. Read the Gospels and pick
out the fundamental teachings of Jesus. You will find that Jesus
rejected Mosaic law at every turn. I suggest you look up the writings
of Thomas Jefferson who spent considerable effort poring over the
Gospels. He even created a summary of Jesus's teachings, stripping
away all the impossible and contradictory stories and narratives
written by ordinary men struggling to convey Jesus's philosophy to the
masses. Jefferson's summary should be required reading for all
Christians. Jefferson wrote his opinion of the Gospels:
"The whole history of these books [the Gospels] is so defective and
doubtful that it seems vain to attempt minute enquiry into it: and
such tricks have been played with their text, and with the texts of
other books relating to them, that we have a right, from that cause,
to entertain much doubt what parts of them are genuine. In the New
Testament there is internal evidence that parts of it have proceeded
from an extraordinary man; and that other parts are of the fabric of
very inferior minds. It is as easy to separate those parts, as to pick
out diamonds from dunghills." Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams,
January 24, 1814
Jefferson was criticizing the writers who struggled to make Jesus into
a Jew, into a follower of Judaism. In so doing, these later writers
smothered the gentle teachings of Jesus under a mountain of barbaric
myths taken from the ancient Sumerians, Babylonians and Egyptians and
compiled by the ancient Jews into a bogus book labeled the "Old
Testament."
But everything Jesus taught was the antithesis of Judaism. Jesus was
not a Jew. By "diamonds," Jefferson meant the actual teachings of "an
extraordinary man," Jesus. The teachings of that extraordinary man
can be sifted out of the New Testament. The teachings are anathema to
the believers in the monstrous myths of the Old Testament.
The teachings are different and the gods are different. Jesus
preached a universal, loving, and gentle God for all; the Old
Testament preached a jealous, violent, and demented demon who favored
a small, genetically connected gang of plunderers. And it was that
genetically connected gang that was instrumental in plundering
Christianity and transforming Christian morality into "Judeo-
Christian" hypocrisy.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Real Diddy Pop" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 10:10:25 PM |
|
|
On Aug 21, 6:42 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
I can' believe that I, an atheist, have to school you on this.
Christianity is the belief that Christ is God manifest and through him
lies eternal salvation. You can predict anything you want, but with
out Christ there is no Christianity. Without Christ there is no new
testament. Christianity as a religion is is grounded and mainly based
on the teachings of Jesus as relayed by his apostles...in the new
testament.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Igor The Terrible" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 11:48:46 PM |
|
|
On Aug 21, 11:10 pm, The Real Diddy Pop <whod...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Aug 21, 6:42 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
I can' believe that I, an atheist, have to school you on this.
Christianity is the belief that Christ is God manifest and through him
lies eternal salvation. You can predict anything you want, but with
out Christ there is no Christianity. Without Christ there is no new
testament. Christianity as a religion is is grounded and mainly based
on the teachings of Jesus as relayed by his apostles...in the new
testament.
It's a lot deeper than that. The perspective of Christianity changes
abrubtly when you put 2 and 2 together and discover that our second
Adam did not die on good friday rather on the passover and all the
events that led up to his day of fulfillment.
Technically, the New Testament should begin on the day of pentacost.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PerfectlyAble" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 07:42:37 PM |
|
|
On Aug 22, 10:42 am, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Christianity sucks. Naff said.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Dave" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 06:30:05 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:42:21 -0700, Codebreaker
<Codebreaker@bigsecret.com> wrote:
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Yea, okay, right.
--
A liberal is someone who will give away everything
except his/her own possessions.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 05:50:45 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:42:21 -0700, Codebreaker wrote:
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Then how about you fucking LEAVE?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"How come God gets credit whenever something good happens? Where was he
when her heart stopped?"
- Dr. House
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 06:14:12 PM |
|
|
In article <Q4udnfe-gezY8VbbnZ2dnUVZ_qbinZ2d@giganews.com> "Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> writes:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:42:21 -0700, Codebreaker wrote:
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Then how about you fucking LEAVE?
After all, the other patrons have a right at their turn
at the computer, don't they?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Codebreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 06:16:09 PM |
|
|
On Aug 21, 6:50 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:42:21 -0700, Codebreaker wrote:
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Then how about you fucking LEAVE?
I am here to enlighten you stupid evolvers
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"How come God gets credit whenever something good happens? Where was he
when her heart stopped?"
- Dr. House
.
|
|
|
| User: "Olrik" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 09:45:57 PM |
|
|
On Aug 21, 7:16 pm, Codebreaker <Codebrea...@bigsecret.com> wrote:
On Aug 21, 6:50 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:42:21 -0700, Codebreaker wrote:
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Then how about you fucking LEAVE?
I am here to enlighten you stupid evolvers
And, as always, doing a very bad job of it (not that you would have
any more luck if you were a literate, coherent poster.)
But as it stands, you're just an ignorant kook with a bad attitude.
Olrik
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"How come God gets credit whenever something good happens? Where was he
when her heart stopped?"
- Dr. House
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K. Bilbo" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
22 Aug 2007 08:46:52 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:16:09 -0700, Codebreaker wrote:
On Aug 21, 6:50 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:42:21 -0700, Codebreaker wrote:
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Then how about you fucking LEAVE?
I am here to enlighten you stupid evolvers
<snork>
Yeah, how's that workin' out for ya?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Can you unmasterbate to someone?"
- Bill Maher
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 10:28:59 PM |
|
|
One fine day in alt.atheism, Codebreaker <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com>
bloodied us up with this:
On Aug 21, 6:50 pm, "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:42:21 -0700, Codebreaker wrote:
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
Then how about you fucking LEAVE?
I am here to enlighten you stupid evolvers
We've been enlightened, theist. Theism only darkens your senses. Throw
the godmonkey off your shoulders, and you'll see what I mean.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Vic" |
|
| Title: Re: The History Of Catholicism Is Not The History Of Christianity |
21 Aug 2007 10:26:47 PM |
|
|
One fine day in alt.atheism, Codebreaker <Codebreaker@bigsecret.com>
bloodied us up with this:
Just as the History of the New Testament does not
necessary coincide with the History of Christianity.
Unless you understand the differences and nuances,
your understandingof the ORIGIN of Christianity will always
be a flawed one. Christianity is grounded on the predictions
made by Moses and not on the writing of the"New Testament"
Baloney. Moses never existed, neither did his exodus according to Egyptian
records. The bible is a ragtag collection of rank mythology, pasted
together by Emperor Constantine at the Council of Nicea. Roman Catholicism
is what he invented, and everything else stemmed out of that. The origin
of Christianity has its roots in the Pagan mystery religions. It evolved
over time into jebus.
HA!
Evolution!
Evolution!
Evolution! Evolution! Evolution! Evolution!
Burn, baby, burn!
SOLA SCRIPTURA sucks so does atheism and Evolution
You mean reality sucks? Actually, sucks to be you.
--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department.
Convicted by Earthquack.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
