| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Yas" |
| Date: |
05 Dec 2003 10:37:57 AM |
| Object: |
The only Democracy in the Middle East |
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Non Jews are discriminated in most areas.
Religious laws dictate the life style of non-religious israeli citizens.
Even today, after 50 years of independence israel has no constitution.
30% of all people under israeli control do not enjoy civil, or even human
rights.
Parts of the education system are controlled by the secret services.
80% of israel's resources belong to 10% of it's citizens (The Russians no
doubt!)
More then 1000 people are held in administrative custody without being
charged, and with no time limits.
israel is the only country that has a law allowing interrogators to use
torture!!!
All mass media channels are held by a handful of families.
in israel, the government has the right to shut down a newspaper.
Non Jewish citizens are forbidden from buying state owned land.
What a wonderful "democracy"
.
|
|
| User: "AnonMoos" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
05 Dec 2003 09:54:01 PM |
|
|
"Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Big deal -- there's an official state Church in England, and Islam is
the official state religion of most Arab countries.
Non Jews are discriminated in most areas.
Any inhabitant of Israel who volunteers to join the Israeli army can
receive most of those special benefits.
Religious laws dictate the life style of non-religious israeli
citizens.
Most of the time, it's secular Jews who are subject to Jewish
religious restrictions. Each religious community has its own sytem of
laws for "personal status matters" -- it's called the "Millet" system,
and it was inherited from the Ottoman empire.
Even today, after 50 years of independence israel has no
constitution.
Big deal -- the U.K. doesn't have a constitution after 937 years of
independence.
What a wonderful "democracy"
It ain't perfect by any means -- but when you compare it to the
political system of any Arab country, then it looks positively
Periclean!
Just go to go to http://www.freedomhouse.org/ , and you'll find in the
2001-2002 report there that few Arab countries meet even miminal
standards of basic democracy, and out of the 47 Muslim-majority
countries in the world only 1 (one) country is classified as meeting
the standards of a fully "Free" society (this is Mali, which is not an
Arab country, and probably narrowly escaped being delisted last year
when an election dispute threatened to turn ugly). By contrast,
Israel got a "2.0 Free" ranking in the same report, on a scale where
1.0-2.5 is "Free", 3.0-5.5 is "Partly Free", and 5.5-7.0 is
"Not Free". The highest-ranking Arab country is Jordan, with a 4.0
rating, while all other Arab countries except Kuwait are firmly in the
"Not Free" category (unless you count Mauretania as being "Arab")
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2002/essay2002.pdf
--
SAUDIA OMNIS IN PARTES TRES DIVIDENDA EST! Free Arabia by
splitting the Saudi tyranny into its three natural parts:
Hejaz-alHarameyn, Nejd-Wahhabistan, and Gulf-Petrolia.
Murderers are not Martyrs! http://symbolictruth.fateback.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Conquistador" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
07 Dec 2003 08:00:18 AM |
|
|
Big deal -- there's an official state Church in England, and Islam is
the official state religion of most Arab countries.
Hey Jewboy, you know about as much about "Islamic countries" as you know
about about the Zionists.
Zionism has murdered 2 million people in the procesas of becoming a Nazi
entity it is right now!
.
|
|
|
| User: "AnonMoos" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
07 Dec 2003 09:19:22 AM |
|
|
"Conquistador" <pinkspider123@earthlink.net> wrote:
AnonMoos wrote:
"Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Big deal -- there's an official state Church in England, and Islam
is the official state religion of most Arab countries.
Non Jews are discriminated in most areas.
Any inhabitant of Israel who volunteers to join the Israeli army
can receive most of those special benefits.
Religious laws dictate the life style of non-religious israeli
citizens.
Most of the time, it's secular Jews who are subject to Jewish
religious restrictions. Each religious community has its own sytem
of laws for "personal status matters" -- it's called the "Millet"
system, and it was inherited from the Ottoman empire.
Even today, after 50 years of independence israel has no
constitution.
Big deal -- the U.K. doesn't have a constitution after 937 years of
independence.
What a wonderful "democracy"
It ain't perfect by any means -- but when you compare it to the
political system of any Arab country, then it looks positively
Periclean!
Just go to go to http://www.freedomhouse.org/ , and you'll find in
the 2001-2002 report there that few Arab countries meet even
miminal standards of basic democracy, and out of the 47
Muslim-majority countries in the world only 1 (one) country is
classified as meeting the standards of a fully "Free" society (this
is Mali, which is not an Arab country, and probably narrowly
escaped being delisted last year when an election dispute
threatened to turn ugly). By contrast, Israel got a "2.0 Free"
ranking in the same report, on a scale where 1.0-2.5 is "Free",
3.0-5.5 is "Partly Free", and 5.5-7.0 is "Not Free". The
highest-ranking Arab country is Jordan, with a 4.0 rating, while
all other Arab countries except Kuwait are firmly in the "Not Free"
category (unless you count Mauretania as being "Arab")
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2002/essay2002.pdf
you know about as much about "Islamic countries" as you know about
about the Zionists.
Not sure what that's supposed to mean, but I certainly know more about
Israel than you do, since I read many general news reports and pay
attention to truth and falsehood; while you merely scrabble around
desperately to find something, anything (whether true or false, you
don't care) which appears to throw a discreditable light on Israel --
not to mention that I know a whole lot more Hebrew than you do!
--
Some Qur'an quotes: 5:20 qaala muusaa 5:21 "yaa qawmi ´dkhuluu ´l-'arDa
´l-muqaddasata ´llatii kataba ´llaahu lakum" 17:104 waqulnaa ... libanii
'israa'iila "´skunuu ´l-'arDa" || In English: Moses said, "My people,
go into the Holy Land which God has assigned to you!" And we said to the
Children of Israel, "Inhabit the land!" http://symbolictruth.fateback.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
10 Dec 2003 05:54:35 AM |
|
|
"AnonMoos" <anonmoos@io.com> wrote in message
news:3FD344FA.37D9F3A4@io.com...
"Conquistador" <pinkspider123@earthlink.net> wrote:
you know about as much about "Islamic countries" as you know about
about the Zionists.
Not sure what that's supposed to mean, but I certainly know more about
Israel than you do, since I read many general news reports and pay
attention to truth and falsehood; while you merely scrabble around
desperately to find something, anything (whether true or false, you
don't care) which appears to throw a discreditable light on Israel --
not to mention that I know a whole lot more Hebrew than you do!
Some Qur'an quotes: 5:20 qaala muusaa 5:21 "yaa qawmi ´dkhuluu ´l-'arDa
´l-muqaddasata ´llatii kataba ´llaahu lakum" 17:104 waqulnaa ... libanii
'israa'iila "´skunuu ´l-'arDa" || In English: Moses said, "My people,
go into the Holy Land which God has assigned to you!" And we said to the
Children of Israel, "Inhabit the land!" http://symbolictruth.fateback.com/
Nothing wrong with going to a country and "inhabiting the land". Most
immigrants throughout the Western world do that, while enjoying equal rights
with their native neigbours.
Not so in Israel, a land soaked in the blood of its native inhabitants.
Since ancient times Jews have staged most horrific holocausts, killing every
inhabitant and his animals throughout the entire "Promised land". Now they
are at it again. Instead of annexing the "occupied territories" making
everyone living there an Israeli citizen with equal rights, they went on a
killing spree against most non-Jews, destroying hundreds of villages,
killing their inhabitants and causing a massive refugee exodus. Now Israelis
wonder why the survivors hate them enough to blow themselves up in the
presence of their ancient and most ruthless enemies.
Where Jews are proud of their holocausts against the natives of the
"promised land", Germans are sorry and ashamed, if not repentant of what
they did to the Jews. Unless they repent, none of those perpetrating or
supporting any and all of man's inhumanity to man and offences against Human
and civil rights will ever see God's Kingdom of Heaven. Their lot will be
hell eternal.
--
Pastor Frank
Famous Zionist Quote (back when the Zionists were really cocky):
"Jewish villages were built in the place of destroyed Arab villages. You do
not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you
because geography books no longer exist, not only do the books not exist,
the Arab villages are not there anymore either. Nahlal arose in the place of
Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of
Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushu'a in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not
one single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab
Population."
--Moshe Dayan, Address to the Technion, Haifa (as quoted in
Ha'aretz, 4 April 1969) http://www.birzeit.edu/crdps/village@.html
http://www.jerusalemites.org/crimes/destroyed_villages/list.htm
Conservative observers state, that Israel was built on the bones of at
least two million Palestinians. By December 1948, 418 Arab villages had been
destroyed, and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency registers 726,000
Palestinian refugees. Walter Eytan, Director-General of Israel's Foreign
Ministry, accepts this figure as meticulous, and even suggests that the
number was closer to 800,000. In Lydda alone Zionist terrorists murdered
50,000 Palestinians, men, women and children, both Muslim and Christian.
Only about 5 percent of the present day Jews came from Palestine,
whereas 95 percent are Khazars.
"...I know the blasphemy of them WHICH SAY THEY ARE JEWS,
and are not, BUT ARE THE SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN." (Revelation
2:9, 3:9)
PETITION TO WORLD LEADERS
We, the undersigned want justice, and have the appalling death toll of
Zionist aggression, oppression, occupation and colonialism in the Middle
East declared a "Crime against Humanity" which must be punished. We
want human rights respected, occupation and confiscation of land made
illegal, and the appalling conditions imposed on occupied civilian
populations lifted.
We want an International Court with power to resolve territorial
disputes established NOW, so that the dispossessed and ethnically
cleansed can sue for redress, instead of having to draw scant
attention to their plight by needing to blow themselves up in the
presence of their most ruthless enemies.
Any government conducting or supporting colonialism or other
human rights abuses, must be declared a rogue state and their leaders
and perpetrators must face criminal charges. Supporting, encouraging
or financing civil rights abusers must be considered a hate crime.
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.547 / Virus Database: 340 - Release Date: 12/2/03
.
|
|
|
| User: "Didymos" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
11 Dec 2003 06:41:33 PM |
|
|
"Pastor Frank" <pfrank@christfirst.com> wrote in message
news:b3db811d2217aa9d2b189da9b16439f5@news.teranews.com...
"AnonMoos" <anonmoos@io.com> wrote in message
news:3FD344FA.37D9F3A4@io.com...
"Conquistador" <pinkspider123@earthlink.net> wrote:
<snip>
Conservative observers state, that Israel was built on the bones of
at
least two million Palestinians.
Exactly who are these "Conservative observers" and where can we find the
data concerning the deaths of these "at least two million Palestinians"?
Are we to presume that your "Zionist entities" murdered these, thus far,
ephemeral 2 milion Palestinians?
By December 1948, 418 Arab villages had been destroyed,
I thought you source said 492? Or was 396? It was all three according to
your source, but those included Jaffa, and we know that city is not a
village and was never destroyed, now, don't we? Ever dig up a reliable
source or two for this bit of propaganda, Pastor Frank?
Might I be so bold as to suggest that the rather gross distortions and
implausible exaggerations you and you web sites attempt to proliferate do
not help your cause? You see, the information sounds just plausible at
first, but then when your readers actually do some checking of your sources,
they find that virtually every assertion is either conflated or inflated and
often both. That undermines your cause and destroys your credibility.
Check your data. Then check it again. Back every assertion with multiple
sources. Then post. Moderation is good. Fundamentalism in every guise is
evil.
The Israelis indeed destroyed Palestinian villages in their war of
independence in 1948. The Israelis indeed massacred people. So did the
Arabs. But the Israelis did not destroy over 400 villages. The Israelies
did not even kill, much less murder, "over 2 million Palestinians." That is
damned silly nonsense and I explain why below, and seeing as Palestine was
crawling with reporters in 1948, I rather doubt massacres and mayhem on that
scale would have gone unreported. And you cannot produce credible sources
for your grossly inflated numbers.
<snip>
Come on, Pastor Frank, what was the pre 1948 population of the British
Mandate of Palestine? This is kind of difficult to estimate precisely
because no census was taken after 1930, but I did a bit of very preliminary
research.
According to estimates at http://www.mideastweb.org/palpop.htm, the total
estimated population of the Palestine Mandate in 1942 was 1,620,005. This
is broken down as: 995,292 or 61.44% Moslem; 484,408 or 29.90% Jewish;
127,184 or 7.85% Christian; and 13,121 or 0.81% Other. A joint
British-American committee of inquiry examined the Palestine Mandate in
1935-46. "According to the report, at the end of 1946, 1,269,000 Arabs and
608,000 Jews resided within the borders of Mandate Palestine."
Everyone else seems to use that data, and I found population data difficult
to lay hands on. May I suggest you use the links at
http://freepalestine.com/links.htm to investigate further the details? You
might also check the pages of Passia.com, and the various UN web pages.
The point I am trying to make here is that your figure of 2 million dead
added to your figure of over 726,000 refugees is over two and one-half times
the total Arab population of the Palestine Mandate in 1948. And there were
and are Arabs living within the borders of Israel who were neither killed
nor fled. Obviously, the figures you cite cannot be true. Can they?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
17 Dec 2003 12:20:48 AM |
|
|
"Didymos" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:198Cb.8106$_r6.50@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Pastor Frank" <pfrank@christfirst.com> wrote in message
news:b3db811d2217aa9d2b189da9b16439f5@news.teranews.com...
"AnonMoos" <anonmoos@io.com> wrote in message
news:3FD344FA.37D9F3A4@io.com...
"Conquistador" <pinkspider123@earthlink.net> wrote:
<snip>
Conservative observers state, that Israel was built on the bones of
at
least two million Palestinians.
Exactly who are these "Conservative observers" and where can we find the
data concerning the deaths of these "at least two million Palestinians"?
Are we to presume that your "Zionist entities" murdered these, thus far,
ephemeral 2 milion Palestinians?
By December 1948, 418 Arab villages had been destroyed,
I thought you source said 492? Or was 396? It was all three according to
your source, but those included Jaffa, and we know that city is not a
village and was never destroyed, now, don't we? Ever dig up a reliable
source or two for this bit of propaganda, Pastor Frank?
Might I be so bold as to suggest that the rather gross distortions and
implausible exaggerations you and you web sites attempt to proliferate do
not help your cause? You see, the information sounds just plausible at
first, but then when your readers actually do some checking of your
sources,
they find that virtually every assertion is either conflated or inflated
and
often both. That undermines your cause and destroys your credibility.
Check your data. Then check it again. Back every assertion with multiple
sources. Then post. Moderation is good. Fundamentalism in every guise
is
evil.
The Israelis indeed destroyed Palestinian villages in their war of
independence in 1948. The Israelis indeed massacred people. So did the
Arabs. But the Israelis did not destroy over 400 villages. The Israelies
did not even kill, much less murder, "over 2 million Palestinians." That
is
damned silly nonsense and I explain why below, and seeing as Palestine was
crawling with reporters in 1948, I rather doubt massacres and mayhem on
that
scale would have gone unreported. And you cannot produce credible sources
for your grossly inflated numbers.
Come on, Pastor Frank, what was the pre 1948 population of the British
Mandate of Palestine? This is kind of difficult to estimate precisely
because no census was taken after 1930, but I did a bit of very
preliminary
research.
According to estimates at http://www.mideastweb.org/palpop.htm, the total
estimated population of the Palestine Mandate in 1942 was 1,620,005. This
is broken down as: 995,292 or 61.44% Moslem; 484,408 or 29.90% Jewish;
127,184 or 7.85% Christian; and 13,121 or 0.81% Other. A joint
British-American committee of inquiry examined the Palestine Mandate in
1935-46. "According to the report, at the end of 1946, 1,269,000 Arabs
and
608,000 Jews resided within the borders of Mandate Palestine."
Everyone else seems to use that data, and I found population data
difficult
to lay hands on. May I suggest you use the links at
http://freepalestine.com/links.htm to investigate further the details?
You
might also check the pages of Passia.com, and the various UN web pages.
The point I am trying to make here is that your figure of 2 million dead
added to your figure of over 726,000 refugees is over two and one-half
times
the total Arab population of the Palestine Mandate in 1948. And there
were
and are Arabs living within the borders of Israel who were neither killed
nor fled. Obviously, the figures you cite cannot be true. Can they?
Explain the below from Moshe Dayan then. Note the phrase "did have an
Arab population". They weren't politely asked to leave, were they?
--
Pastor Frank
Famous Zionist Quote (back when the Zionists were really cocky):
"Jewish villages were built in the place of destroyed Arab villages. You do
not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you
because geography books no longer exist, not only do the books not exist,
the Arab villages are not there anymore either. Nahlal arose in the place of
Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of
Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushu'a in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not
one single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab
Population."
--Moshe Dayan, Address to the Technion, Haifa (as quoted in
Ha'aretz, 4 April 1969) http://www.birzeit.edu/crdps/village@.html
http://www.jerusalemites.org/crimes/destroyed_villages/list.htm
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.547 / Virus Database: 340 - Release Date: 12/2/03
.
|
|
|
| User: " Didymos" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
17 Dec 2003 09:47:37 AM |
|
|
"Pastor Frank" <pfrank@christfirst.com> wrote in message
news:0ae4e3d9aa756a9443af5215bfe1b6cd@news.teranews.com...
"Didymos" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:198Cb.8106$_r6.50@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"Pastor Frank" <pfrank@christfirst.com> wrote in message
news:b3db811d2217aa9d2b189da9b16439f5@news.teranews.com...
"AnonMoos" <anonmoos@io.com> wrote in message
news:3FD344FA.37D9F3A4@io.com...
"Conquistador" <pinkspider123@earthlink.net> wrote:
<snip>
Conservative observers state, that Israel was built on the bones
of
at
least two million Palestinians.
Exactly who are these "Conservative observers" and where can we find the
data concerning the deaths of these "at least two million Palestinians"?
Are we to presume that your "Zionist entities" murdered these, thus far,
ephemeral 2 milion Palestinians?
By December 1948, 418 Arab villages had been destroyed,
I thought you source said 492? Or was 396? It was all three according
to
your source, but those included Jaffa, and we know that city is not a
village and was never destroyed, now, don't we? Ever dig up a reliable
source or two for this bit of propaganda, Pastor Frank?
Might I be so bold as to suggest that the rather gross distortions and
implausible exaggerations you and you web sites attempt to proliferate
do
not help your cause? You see, the information sounds just plausible at
first, but then when your readers actually do some checking of your
sources,
they find that virtually every assertion is either conflated or inflated
and
often both. That undermines your cause and destroys your credibility.
Check your data. Then check it again. Back every assertion with
multiple
sources. Then post. Moderation is good. Fundamentalism in every guise
is
evil.
The Israelis indeed destroyed Palestinian villages in their war of
independence in 1948. The Israelis indeed massacred people. So did the
Arabs. But the Israelis did not destroy over 400 villages. The
Israelies
did not even kill, much less murder, "over 2 million Palestinians."
That
is
damned silly nonsense and I explain why below, and seeing as Palestine
was
crawling with reporters in 1948, I rather doubt massacres and mayhem on
that
scale would have gone unreported. And you cannot produce credible
sources
for your grossly inflated numbers.
Come on, Pastor Frank, what was the pre 1948 population of the British
Mandate of Palestine? This is kind of difficult to estimate precisely
because no census was taken after 1930, but I did a bit of very
preliminary
research.
According to estimates at http://www.mideastweb.org/palpop.htm, the
total
estimated population of the Palestine Mandate in 1942 was 1,620,005.
This
is broken down as: 995,292 or 61.44% Moslem; 484,408 or 29.90% Jewish;
127,184 or 7.85% Christian; and 13,121 or 0.81% Other. A joint
British-American committee of inquiry examined the Palestine Mandate in
1935-46. "According to the report, at the end of 1946, 1,269,000 Arabs
and
608,000 Jews resided within the borders of Mandate Palestine."
Everyone else seems to use that data, and I found population data
difficult
to lay hands on. May I suggest you use the links at
http://freepalestine.com/links.htm to investigate further the details?
You
might also check the pages of Passia.com, and the various UN web pages.
The point I am trying to make here is that your figure of 2 million dead
added to your figure of over 726,000 refugees is over two and one-half
times
the total Arab population of the Palestine Mandate in 1948. And there
were
and are Arabs living within the borders of Israel who were neither
killed
nor fled. Obviously, the figures you cite cannot be true. Can they?
Explain the below from Moshe Dayan then. Note the phrase "did have an
Arab population". They weren't politely asked to leave, were they?
--
Pastor Frank
Nope. Moshe Dayan's purported quote which you extracted from a web page we
have already demonstrated is rife with obfuscations, exaggerations, and
outright lies has nothing to do with your unconscionably dishonest posts
shot through with easily provable falsehood. Cite a reliable source and I
may agree to discuss it. But then again, maybe I will not.
Pay attention and read carefully this time: Two million Palestinians were
not killed by "Zionists" or anyone else at any time in modern history. That
number is an outright lie. That number is an outrageous and laughably silly
lie when it is used in the context of the Israeli War of Independence in
1948 because 2 million is roughly double the number of Arab known to have
been alive and residing in the British Palestine Mandate. The number of
villages your various and silly web sites claim were destroyed is also a
laughably inept lie. That too has been pretty convincingly demonstrated.
Your own extraordinarly biased sources cannot even agree internally, much
less externally. Does anybody read this crap before it is posted? May I be
so bold as to suggest just a tad bit of quality control?
The point, yet again, is this. Read slowly and carefully, Pator Frank. The
Israeli-Arab issue is one of the tragedies of the past 100 years, and both
sides have committed atrocities against the other. Publishing obviously
concocted, exaggerated, and laughably transparent lies in an incompetent
attempt to excite emotional sympathy for one side against the other is inept
to the point of outright stupidity, among other things. Go do your homework
and discover what villages actually were destroyed by both sides. Go
examine the record to discover approximately how many people were killed and
murdered on both sides, and you will discover your lie of 2 million is off
by a factor of ten or more. When you have some reliable data, let's discuss
it. I am not responsible for the fact that you were hoodwinked by people
who share your cause. Posting lies never helps and often hurts. And you
should read with much greater scepticism. It may prevent you from looking
quite so foolish in the future.
By the way, you have not answered the questions concerning the reliablility
of your statistics. Why not?
Famous Zionist Quote (back when the Zionists were really cocky):
"Jewish villages were built in the place of destroyed Arab villages. You
do
not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you
because geography books no longer exist, not only do the books not exist,
the Arab villages are not there anymore either. Nahlal arose in the place
of
Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of
Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushu'a in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not
one single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab
Population."
--Moshe Dayan, Address to the Technion, Haifa (as quoted in
Ha'aretz, 4 April 1969) http://www.birzeit.edu/crdps/village@.html
http://www.jerusalemites.org/crimes/destroyed_villages/list.htm
These sites contain transparent and sillyass lies and can't make up their
own minds what was or was not destroyed by the "Zionists." The second site
states that 492, 418, and 396 villages were "obliterated" by "Zionists" in
1948 on different pages on this site. And then the dumb ***** that wrote one
of the pages boldly asserts that Jaffa is a "village" and was "destroyed" in
1948. Geez . . . . shouldn't honest Christians be embarrassed to quote such
blatantly dishonest bilge? Is reposting the same lie repeatedly not the sin
of bearing false witness?
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.547 / Virus Database: 340 - Release Date: 12/2/03
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "AnonMoos" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
10 Dec 2003 02:55:25 PM |
|
|
"Pastor Frank" <pfrank@christlast.com> wrote:
"AnonMoos" <anonmoos@io.com> wrote in message
news:3FD344FA.37D9F3A4@io.com...
"Conquistador" <pinkspider123@earthlink.net> wrote:
AnonMoos wrote:
"Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East.. What a wonderful
"democracy"
It ain't perfect by any means -- but when you compare it to the
political system of any Arab country, then it looks positively
Periclean!
Just go to go to http://www.freedomhouse.org/ , and you'll find
in the 2001-2002 report there that few Arab countries meet even
miminal standards of basic democracy, and out of the 47
Muslim-majority countries in the world only 1 (one) country is
classified as meeting the standards of a fully "Free" society
(this is Mali, which is not an Arab country, and probably
narrowly escaped being delisted last year when an election
dispute threatened to turn ugly). By contrast, Israel got a "2.0
Free" ranking in the same report, on a scale where 1.0-2.5 is
"Free", 3.0-5.5 is "Partly Free", and 5.5-7.0 is "Not Free". The
highest-ranking Arab country is Jordan, with a 4.0 rating, while
all other Arab countries except Kuwait are firmly in the "Not
Free" category (unless you count Mauretania as being "Arab")
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2002/essay2002.pdf
you know about as much about "Islamic countries" as you know about
about the Zionists.
Not sure what that's supposed to mean, but I certainly know more
about Israel than you do, since I read many general news reports
and pay attention to truth and falsehood; while you merely scrabble
around desperately to find something, anything (whether true or
false, you don't care) which appears to throw a discreditable light
on Israel -- not to mention that I know a whole lot more Hebrew
than you do!
-- Some Qur'an quotes: 5:20 qaala muusaa 5:21 "yaa qawmi ´dkhuluu
´l-'arDa ´l-muqaddasata ´llatii kataba ´llaahu lakum" 17:104
waqulnaa ... libanii 'israa'iila "´skunuu ´l-'arDa" || In English:
Moses said, "My people, go into the Holy Land which God has
assigned to you!" And we said to the Children of Israel, "Inhabit
the land!" http://symbolictruth.fateback.com/
in Israel, Since ancient times Jews have staged most horrific
holocausts, killing every inhabitant and his animals throughout the
entire "Promised land". Now they are at it again.
You know, phony "Pastor" Frank, you're just a monotonous one-trick
poney. StriderCabal is a shameless brazen liar, but at least he varies
his lies from time to time, and doesn't always repeat the same ones --
while you're just a boring tedious broken record, whom it's not even
worthwhile pretending to have any kind of normal discussion with.
P.S. If you have any objection to the Qur'an quotes in my sig, take
it up with Muhammad, not me (unless you have any objections to my
translation of the quotes, in which case I'd be interested to hear
your detailed insights into Classical Arabic grammar -- if any).
--
Hamas motto: لا إله لهم
إلا الموت،
«حماس» رسول
الموت (The death-worshipping cult)
Murderers are not martyrs! http://symbolictruth.fateback.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David T" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
08 Dec 2003 01:59:05 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 21:54:01 -0600, AnonMoos <anonmoos@io.com> wrote:
"Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Big deal -- there's an official state Church in England, and Islam is
the official state religion of most Arab countries.
Actually I think it's all Arab countries. It's just most countries
with a Muslim majority.
Non Jews are discriminated in most areas.
Any inhabitant of Israel who volunteers to join the Israeli army can
receive most of those special benefits.
Religious laws dictate the life style of non-religious israeli
citizens.
Most of the time, it's secular Jews who are subject to Jewish
religious restrictions. Each religious community has its own sytem of
laws for "personal status matters" -- it's called the "Millet" system,
and it was inherited from the Ottoman empire.
Even today, after 50 years of independence israel has no
constitution.
Big deal -- the U.K. doesn't have a constitution after 937 years of
independence.
What a wonderful "democracy"
It ain't perfect by any means -- but when you compare it to the
political system of any Arab country, then it looks positively
Periclean!
Just go to go to http://www.freedomhouse.org/ , and you'll find in the
2001-2002 report there that few Arab countries meet even miminal
standards of basic democracy, and out of the 47 Muslim-majority
countries in the world only 1 (one) country is classified as meeting
the standards of a fully "Free" society (this is Mali, which is not an
Arab country, and probably narrowly escaped being delisted last year
when an election dispute threatened to turn ugly). By contrast,
Israel got a "2.0 Free" ranking in the same report, on a scale where
1.0-2.5 is "Free", 3.0-5.5 is "Partly Free", and 5.5-7.0 is
"Not Free". The highest-ranking Arab country is Jordan, with a 4.0
rating, while all other Arab countries except Kuwait are firmly in the
"Not Free" category (unless you count Mauretania as being "Arab")
http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/freeworld/2002/essay2002.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David T" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
17 Dec 2003 12:27:39 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:37:57 -0000, "Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
What a piece of work you are, scum bucket. On December 5th you posted
the exact same dreck. I posted a reply saying you'd ignore it because
you couldn't respond to facts. As usual, I'm proven right.
You can't respond to the facts so you wait two weeks and re-post.
Sorry, but we Zionists aren't as stupid as you anti-Semites. Here it
is again:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Though I don't expect it, I do request you to quit your repeated
lying.
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:37:57 -0000, "Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Exactly how? People of all religions are citizens, vote and have equal
rights. That's separation.
Non Jews are discriminated in most areas.
Not true. Arabs are often discriminated against, but every democracy
has problems with discrimination. You charge means there are no
democracies. Actually there aren't, just forms of democratic
republics, but that's probably beyone you.
Religious laws dictate the life style of non-religious israeli citizens.
Yup, and something Shinui is fighting to change. Also note, the laws
only affect non-religious Jews. Arab stores have their own hours,
Rabbis have no control over marriages of other religions, and each
religion has its own freedoms.
Even so, explain how laws about when Jewish stores can be open
violates a democracy. Did the old Massachusetts (and other States)
Blue Laws mean the US wasn't a democracy? If the Knesset ever wishes
to take the power away from the Rabbis it can. That's democracy.
Unlike Iran where the religious council has absolute authority and
power.
Even today, after 50 years of independence israel has no constitution.
England's been a nation much longer and still has no constitution.
Both have a basic set of laws that count as a constitution. In Israel,
they're not surprisingly called the Basic Laws
(http://www.jcpa.org/dje/articles/const-intro-93.htm)
Now please explain to me how England isn't a democracy because it
lacks a constitution.
30% of all people under israeli control do not enjoy civil, or even human
rights.
And if those 30% wanted peace, there wouldn't be Israeli control. That
point adds nothing to your argument but rather proves that its the
folks trying to destroy Israel that don't believe in democracy.
Parts of the education system are controlled by the secret services.
Right puppy. Check your tin foil hat, it's slipping.
80% of israel's resources belong to 10% of it's citizens (The Russians no
doubt!)
Any shred of proof of that one? Meanwhile, in most of the developed
world -- The USA, England, other parts of Western Europe -- that
percentage is usual or even low. The wealthy are wealthy because,
believe it or not, they control more of the wealth than those who are
not wealthy. That, however, doesn't obviate the concept of democracy.
More then 1000 people are held in administrative custody without being
charged, and with no time limits.
Out of more than 3 million folks, by your own statements above? Pretty
low percenage. The non-democracies of the Arab world are much worse.
80% of political prisoiners are held in Muslim countries, while Islam
is only 20% of the world's population. So the democracy of Israel is
doing much better than your friends.
And from the group of 3 million that states Israel shouldn't exist and
that the suicide bombings of civilians is just. Yes, I think there are
too many folks in custody without being charged, but again that's a
different point that democracy. It's a question of being in a war
zone. Were prisoners of war in any other war charged in courts of law
or were they held until the end of the war?
israel is the only country that has a law allowing interrogators to use
torture!!!
1) Show me that law. 2) The *N reports torture is regularly used in
Arab countries. As for one additional piece of fun, look at appendix 4
of http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engact400082003. It lists
countries with reported use of electro-torture (including Canada. Yes,
Canada). Look at how many democracies are listed. Also note that
Israel isn't.
All mass media channels are held by a handful of families.
Have you heard of Rupert Murdoch? How about the tight control of media
by governments and corporations in Europe and the US? Meanwhile, if
you lived here you'd know how many international stations are on cable
and satellite. If I understood Arabic I could watch news from Egypt,
Jordan (actually they also broadcast in English), Syria and elsewhere.
We get CNN, FoxNews, BBC, Skynews and Russian news.
Show me an Arab country where most people can get more than the
government's media or a democracy with more access to international
information.
in israel, the government has the right to shut down a newspaper.
Nope, but it does have the right to censor papers. Is Germany not a
democracy because it has laws that can shut down cults, people who
espouse violent anti-semitism, and for other reasons? Is England not a
democracy because the government says no English media can discuss the
rumours Prince Charles' possible bisexual activities?
Non Jewish citizens are forbidden from buying state owned land.
No, puppy, everyone's forbidden from buying state owned land. That's
why it is State owned. It is held in trust for the people and by the
Basic Laws (remember them?) can't be sold.
However, Jews and non-Jews alike have leased State owned land.
What a wonderful "democracy"
Once again all you've shown is that anti-zionism is just Newspeak for
anti-semitism. All you can do is ignore reality and lie in order to
push your message of hate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pastor Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
18 Dec 2003 07:01:16 AM |
|
|
"David T" <icne2469nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:tr71uvg670nkgg3kfgg7m5fuih2hg59m9e@4ax.com...
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:37:57 -0000, "Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
30% of all people under israeli control do not enjoy civil, or even human
rights.
And if those 30% wanted peace, there wouldn't be Israeli control. That
point adds nothing to your argument but rather proves that its the
folks trying to destroy Israel that don't believe in democracy.
That's an argument borrowed from Apartheid Afrikaners, when blacks got
penned into time homlands in the desert and revolted. Let the refugees go
home, or at least pay them restitution / compensation and there won't be any
revolt. "Destroy Israel" indeed!!!! If israel can only exist by butalizing
those who object being dispossessed without compensation, it needs to be
"destroyed".
Parts of the education system are controlled by the secret services.
Right puppy. Check your tin foil hat, it's slipping.
Since Israel considers itself at war, EVERYTHING is controlled by the
propaganda machine of the secret services.
80% of israel's resources belong to 10% of it's citizens (The Russians no
doubt!)
Any shred of proof of that one? Meanwhile, in most of the developed
world -- The USA, England, other parts of Western Europe -- that
percentage is usual or even low. The wealthy are wealthy because,
believe it or not, they control more of the wealth than those who are
not wealthy. That, however, doesn't obviate the concept of democracy.
More then 1000 people are held in administrative custody without being
charged, and with no time limits.
Out of more than 3 million folks, by your own statements above? Pretty
low percenage. The non-democracies of the Arab world are much worse.
80% of political prisoiners are held in Muslim countries, while Islam
is only 20% of the world's population. So the democracy of Israel is
doing much better than your friends.
Comparing yourself to your fellow Semites now, are you? "We are not as
bad as them!!!!" It's a lousy argument to justify brutality towards the
defenceless.
What a wonderful "democracy"
Once again all you've shown is that anti-zionism is just Newspeak for
anti-semitism. All you can do is ignore reality and lie in order to
push your message of hate.
"Hate" indeed!!!! That's what Hitler's goons said when anyone complained
about their maltreatment of Jews, or redneck Afrikaners and Americans when
anyone complained about their treatment of blacks, etc. etc. ad infinitum.
Also it is well to remember, that Arabs are far purer Semites than today's
Jews, who are mostly Arian Khazars.
We Christian Human Rights advocates are decidedly NOT anti-Semites.
--
Pastor Frank
PETITION TO WORLD LEADERS
We the undersigned want justice, and have the appalling death toll of
Zionist aggression, oppression, occupation and colonialism in the Middle
East declared a "Crime against Humanity" which must be punished. We want
human rights respected, occupation made illegal, and the appalling
conditions imposed on occupied civilian populations lifted.
We want an International Court with power to resolve territorial
disputes established NOW, so that the dispossessed and ethnically cleansed
can sue for redress, instead of having to resort to suicide bombing to draw
scant attention to their plight. Any government conducting or supporting
colonialism or other human rights abuses, must be declared a rogue state and
their leaders and perpetrators must face criminal charges. Supporting,
encouraging or financing human and civil rights abusers must be considered
a hate crime.
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.547 / Virus Database: 340 - Release Date: 12/2/03
.
|
|
|
| User: "A Didymos" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
18 Dec 2003 06:14:20 PM |
|
|
"Pastor Frank" <pfrank@christfirst.com> wrote in message
news:5d688f718332309f104760dce507fbc6@news.teranews.com...
"David T" <icne2469nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:tr71uvg670nkgg3kfgg7m5fuih2hg59m9e@4ax.com...
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:37:57 -0000, "Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
30% of all people under israeli control do not enjoy civil, or even
human
rights.
How realiable are those statistics, Pastor Frank? Did you check and double
check them before you posted? Are they from a reliable source, or a
notoriously unreliable source such as Hamas. Islamic Jihad, or Al Qaida?
And if those 30% wanted peace, there wouldn't be Israeli control. That
point adds nothing to your argument but rather proves that its the
folks trying to destroy Israel that don't believe in democracy.
That's an argument borrowed from Apartheid Afrikaners, when blacks got
penned into time homlands in the desert and revolted. Let the refugees go
home, or at least pay them restitution / compensation and there won't be
any
revolt. "Destroy Israel" indeed!!!! If israel can only exist by butalizing
those who object being dispossessed without compensation, it needs to be
"destroyed".
Parts of the education system are controlled by the secret services.
Right puppy. Check your tin foil hat, it's slipping.
Since Israel considers itself at war, EVERYTHING is controlled by the
propaganda machine of the secret services.
Really? What I have read from sevreal sources indicates to me that there
are bitter and protacted debates and arguments in the Knessett and Sharon's
cabinet. Are you trying to state that informtion is controlled in Israel by
the intelligence services?
80% of israel's resources belong to 10% of it's citizens (The Russians
no
doubt!)
Now I cannot help but wonder just how reliable those numbers are. And also
if those are accurate statistics, how does the distrubution of wealth and
resources in Israel compare with that in the West Bank and Gaza, Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait, Lebanon, Egypt, and even the United States of America? Got
any answers, Pastor Frank?
Any shred of proof of that one? Meanwhile, in most of the developed
world -- The USA, England, other parts of Western Europe -- that
percentage is usual or even low. The wealthy are wealthy because,
believe it or not, they control more of the wealth than those who are
not wealthy. That, however, doesn't obviate the concept of democracy.
More then 1000 people are held in administrative custody without being
charged, and with no time limits.
Out of more than 3 million folks, by your own statements above? Pretty
low percenage. The non-democracies of the Arab world are much worse.
80% of political prisoiners are held in Muslim countries, while Islam
is only 20% of the world's population. So the democracy of Israel is
doing much better than your friends.
Comparing yourself to your fellow Semites now, are you? "We are not as
bad as them!!!!" It's a lousy argument to justify brutality towards the
defenceless.
What a wonderful "democracy"
Once again all you've shown is that anti-zionism is just Newspeak for
anti-semitism. All you can do is ignore reality and lie in order to
push your message of hate.
"Hate" indeed!!!! That's what Hitler's goons said when anyone
complained
about their maltreatment of Jews, or redneck Afrikaners and Americans when
anyone complained about their treatment of blacks, etc. etc. ad infinitum.
Also it is well to remember, that Arabs are far purer Semites than today's
Jews, who are mostly Arian Khazars.
We Christian Human Rights advocates are decidedly NOT anti-Semites.
But not exactly committed to any semblance of truth, are you Pastor Frank,
fundamentalist Christian Pastor Frank. Nor are you terribly good at posting
reliable and accurate information. Let's see here, what is worse? An
anti-semite or an anti-Jew or a persistent bearer of false witness?
--
Pastor Frank
PETITION TO WORLD LEADERS
We the undersigned want justice, and have the appalling death toll of
Zionist aggression, oppression, occupation and colonialism in the Middle
East declared a "Crime against Humanity" which must be punished. We want
human rights respected, occupation made illegal, and the appalling
conditions imposed on occupied civilian populations lifted.
We want an International Court with power to resolve territorial
disputes established NOW, so that the dispossessed and ethnically cleansed
can sue for redress, instead of having to resort to suicide bombing to
draw
scant attention to their plight. Any government conducting or supporting
colonialism or other human rights abuses, must be declared a rogue state
and
their leaders and perpetrators must face criminal charges. Supporting,
encouraging or financing human and civil rights abusers must be considered
a hate crime.
---
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.547 / Virus Database: 340 - Release Date: 12/2/03
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "David T" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
05 Dec 2003 02:01:01 PM |
|
|
Though I don't expect it, I do request you to quit your repeated
lying.
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:37:57 -0000, "Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Exactly how? People of all religions are citizens, vote and have equal
rights. That's separation.
Non Jews are discriminated in most areas.
Not true. Arabs are often discriminated against, but every democracy
has problems with discrimination. You charge means there are no
democracies. Actually there aren't, just forms of democratic
republics, but that's probably beyone you.
Religious laws dictate the life style of non-religious israeli citizens.
Yup, and something Shinui is fighting to change. Also note, the laws
only affect non-religious Jews. Arab stores have their own hours,
Rabbis have no control over marriages of other religions, and each
religion has its own freedoms.
Even so, explain how laws about when Jewish stores can be open
violates a democracy. Did the old Massachusetts (and other States)
Blue Laws mean the US wasn't a democracy? If the Knesset ever wishes
to take the power away from the Rabbis it can. That's democracy.
Unlike Iran where the religious council has absolute authority and
power.
Even today, after 50 years of independence israel has no constitution.
England's been a nation much longer and still has no constitution.
Both have a basic set of laws that count as a constitution. In Israel,
they're not surprisingly called the Basic Laws
(http://www.jcpa.org/dje/articles/const-intro-93.htm)
Now please explain to me how England isn't a democracy because it
lacks a constitution.
30% of all people under israeli control do not enjoy civil, or even human
rights.
And if those 30% wanted peace, there wouldn't be Israeli control. That
point adds nothing to your argument but rather proves that its the
folks trying to destroy Israel that don't believe in democracy.
Parts of the education system are controlled by the secret services.
Right puppy. Check your tin foil hat, it's slipping.
80% of israel's resources belong to 10% of it's citizens (The Russians no
doubt!)
Any shred of proof of that one? Meanwhile, in most of the developed
world -- The USA, England, other parts of Western Europe -- that
percentage is usual or even low. The wealthy are wealthy because,
believe it or not, they control more of the wealth than those who are
not wealthy. That, however, doesn't obviate the concept of democracy.
More then 1000 people are held in administrative custody without being
charged, and with no time limits.
Out of more than 3 million folks, by your own statements above? Pretty
low percenage. The non-democracies of the Arab world are much worse.
80% of political prisoiners are held in Muslim countries, while Islam
is only 20% of the world's population. So the democracy of Israel is
doing much better than your friends.
And from the group of 3 million that states Israel shouldn't exist and
that the suicide bombings of civilians is just. Yes, I think there are
too many folks in custody without being charged, but again that's a
different point that democracy. It's a question of being in a war
zone. Were prisoners of war in any other war charged in courts of law
or were they held until the end of the war?
israel is the only country that has a law allowing interrogators to use
torture!!!
1) Show me that law. 2) The *N reports torture is regularly used in
Arab countries. As for one additional piece of fun, look at appendix 4
of http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engact400082003. It lists
countries with reported use of electro-torture (including Canada. Yes,
Canada). Look at how many democracies are listed. Also note that
Israel isn't.
All mass media channels are held by a handful of families.
Have you heard of Rupert Murdoch? How about the tight control of media
by governments and corporations in Europe and the US? Meanwhile, if
you lived here you'd know how many international stations are on cable
and satellite. If I understood Arabic I could watch news from Egypt,
Jordan (actually they also broadcast in English), Syria and elsewhere.
We get CNN, FoxNews, BBC, Skynews and Russian news.
Show me an Arab country where most people can get more than the
government's media or a democracy with more access to international
information.
in israel, the government has the right to shut down a newspaper.
Nope, but it does have the right to censor papers. Is Germany not a
democracy because it has laws that can shut down cults, people who
espouse violent anti-semitism, and for other reasons? Is England not a
democracy because the government says no English media can discuss the
rumours Prince Charles' possible bisexual activities?
Non Jewish citizens are forbidden from buying state owned land.
No, puppy, everyone's forbidden from buying state owned land. That's
why it is State owned. It is held in trust for the people and by the
Basic Laws (remember them?) can't be sold.
However, Jews and non-Jews alike have leased State owned land.
What a wonderful "democracy"
Once again all you've shown is that anti-zionism is just Newspeak for
anti-semitism. All you can do is ignore reality and lie in order to
push your message of hate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DosesOfReality3" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
07 Dec 2003 04:35:33 PM |
|
|
David T <icne2469nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<49n1tvojd51cg55cqd6pqlddid1045mf7s@4ax.com>...
Though I don't expect it, I do request you to quit your repeated
lying.
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:37:57 -0000, "Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Exactly how? People of all religions are citizens, vote and have equal
rights. That's separation.
A clear seperation is apparent when you view the squawlor and
discriminaton against the Arabs. Government jobs, funding for housing,
infrastucture and the like are all distributed along ethnic lines.
Non Jews are discriminated in most areas.
Not true. Arabs are often discriminated against, but every democracy
has problems with discrimination. You charge means there are no
democracies. Actually there aren't, just forms of democratic
republics, but that's probably beyone you.
Discrimnation along ethnic and religous lines are an everyday event in
Israel, even amongst the Jews themselves, where Shephardic Jews are
discrimnated against by the Akanazi majority.
Religious laws dictate the life style of non-religious israeli citizens.
Yup, and something Shinui is fighting to change. Also note, the laws
only affect non-religious Jews. Arab stores have their own hours,
Rabbis have no control over marriages of other religions, and each
religion has its own freedoms.
Even so, explain how laws about when Jewish stores can be open
violates a democracy. Did the old Massachusetts (and other States)
Blue Laws mean the US wasn't a democracy? If the Knesset ever wishes
to take the power away from the Rabbis it can. That's democracy.
Unlike Iran where the religious council has absolute authority and
power.
A rather pathetic attempt at making store hours a description of
life-style. Childish and hardly worth the reply.
Even today, after 50 years of independence israel has no constitution.
England's been a nation much longer and still has no constitution.
Both have a basic set of laws that count as a constitution. In Israel,
they're not surprisingly called the Basic Laws
(http://www.jcpa.org/dje/articles/const-intro-93.htm)
Now please explain to me how England isn't a democracy because it
lacks a constitution.
A simple explaination, it should be right up your alley then,
Constitutions are declarations of rights for a state's citizenry, they
don't define a democracy, they lay out the rights of the citizens and
are supposed to create universality for the citizens. That is why
Zionists will never be able to create a Constitution, unless they
complete their ethnic cleansing of the state.
30% of all people under israeli control do not enjoy civil, or even human
rights.
And if those 30% wanted peace, there wouldn't be Israeli control. That
point adds nothing to your argument but rather proves that its the
folks trying to destroy Israel that don't believe in democracy.
A complete lack of answering the 30% rights issue, and an obvious
reply of a Zionist, a classic example of a self-fulfilling paranoid
delusion.
Parts of the education system are controlled by the secret services.
Right puppy. Check your tin foil hat, it's slipping.
80% of israel's resources belong to 10% of it's citizens (The Russians no
doubt!)
Any shred of proof of that one? Meanwhile, in most of the developed
world -- The USA, England, other parts of Western Europe -- that
percentage is usual or even low. The wealthy are wealthy because,
believe it or not, they control more of the wealth than those who are
not wealthy. That, however, doesn't obviate the concept of democracy.
Rampant capitalism is far from being a democractic institution,
capitalism in itself is more a dictorial institution, where the power
focuses into larger and larger corporations controlled by the
officers. Something akin to Commmunism where more of the control goes
to the higher ranking party members, in the end corruption
disintigrates the structure. When viewing the corruption of the last
few years in the US, and the ease with which US justice was bought, a
similar situation is taking place in the US.
More then 1000 people are held in administrative custody without being
charged, and with no time limits.
Out of more than 3 million folks, by your own statements above? Pretty
low percenage. The non-democracies of the Arab world are much worse.
80% of political prisoiners are held in Muslim countries, while Islam
is only 20% of the world's population. So the democracy of Israel is
doing much better than your friends.
Care to garner a scrap of proof to back your claims?
Thought not.
Like it or not the legal systems in Muslim countries are working, the
crime rates in these countries are miniscule by comparison. In the US
1 in 10 people have been jailed for more than 6 months in their life,
towit they're criminals.
And from the group of 3 million that states Israel shouldn't exist and
that the suicide bombings of civilians is just. Yes, I think there are
too many folks in custody without being charged, but again that's a
different point that democracy. It's a question of being in a war
zone. Were prisoners of war in any other war charged in courts of law
or were they held until the end of the war?
When Israel answers to their obvious war crimes, crimes against
humanity, etc. etc. then there maybe an argument made against the
suicide bombers, as of now the Arabs are fighting the overwhelming
oppression with the most effective weapon they have. Self sacrifice in
a war is as old as there was war, most noteably in WWII and Vietnam,
where human bombs were weapons of last resort.
israel is the only country that has a law allowing interrogators to use
torture!!!
1) Show me that law. 2) The *N reports torture is regularly used in
Arab countries. As for one additional piece of fun, look at appendix 4
of http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engact400082003. It lists
countries with reported use of electro-torture (including Canada. Yes,
Canada). Look at how many democracies are listed. Also note that
Israel isn't.
Well with that pathetic logic you can then justify the Holocaust.
Hardly suprising given the obvious parallels between Zionism and
Nazism.
All mass media channels are held by a handful of families.
Have you heard of Rupert Murdoch? How about the tight control of media
by governments and corporations in Europe and the US? Meanwhile, if
you lived here you'd know how many international stations are on cable
and satellite. If I understood Arabic I could watch news from Egypt,
Jordan (actually they also broadcast in English), Syria and elsewhere.
We get CNN, FoxNews, BBC, Skynews and Russian news.
Show me an Arab country where most people can get more than the
government's media or a democracy with more access to international
information.
The remark about control of media is most likely a reference about the
control of the majority of minds in a supposedly free country, and the
vast majority of the population watches the mainstream media.
in israel, the government has the right to shut down a newspaper.
Nope, but it does have the right to censor papers. Is Germany not a
democracy because it has laws that can shut down cults, people who
espouse violent anti-semitism, and for other reasons? Is England not a
democracy because the government says no English media can discuss the
rumours Prince Charles' possible bisexual activities?
Censorship is just another divergence from Freedom of the Press,
religating the truth to something that the government controls, a
clear parallel is with Nazism and Communism.
Non Jewish citizens are forbidden from buying state owned land.
No, puppy, everyone's forbidden from buying state owned land. That's
why it is State owned. It is held in trust for the people and by the
Basic Laws (remember them?) can't be sold.
However, Jews and non-Jews alike have leased State owned land.
What a wonderful "democracy"
Once again all you've shown is that anti-zionism is just Newspeak for
anti-semitism. All you can do is ignore reality and lie in order to
push your message of hate.
Mindless obedience is what you're displaying, the oppressive socialist
movements of the last century were laden full with folks like
yourself, your latent racism is now displayed for all. Ahhhh the
wonders of the internet, Zionist filth like yourself can no longer
hide the evil deeds. The time is coming to an end for the US and
Israel's reign of terror, the corrupt systems will cave in on
themselves over the next decade. Who knows, at the end of it all
democracy may take hold in these two nations as well, you never know.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David T" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
08 Dec 2003 01:58:00 PM |
|
|
On 7 Dec 2003 14:35:33 -0800,
(DosesOfReality3) wrote:
David T <icne2469nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<49n1tvojd51cg55cqd6pqlddid1045mf7s@4ax.com>...
Though I don't expect it, I do request you to quit your repeated
lying.
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:37:57 -0000, "Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Exactly how? People of all religions are citizens, vote and have equal
rights. That's separation.
A clear seperation is apparent when you view the squawlor and
discriminaton against the Arabs. Government jobs, funding for housing,
infrastucture and the like are all distributed along ethnic lines.
The vast majority of poor in the US are black. The South Asian
immigrants in Britain are often discriminated against. The list goes
on. And just as with other democracies, there are folks in the
majority who both decry the discrimination but try to change it.
Having discrimination that is a problem does not obviate the title of
democracy. Rather, it just means that like all other democracies there
are problems.
Non Jews are discriminated in most areas.
Not true. Arabs are often discriminated against, but every democracy
has problems with discrimination. You charge means there are no
democracies. Actually there aren't, just forms of democratic
republics, but that's probably beyone you.
Discrimnation along ethnic and religous lines are an everyday event in
Israel, even amongst the Jews themselves, where Shephardic Jews are
discrimnated against by the Akanazi majority.
And the point might be?
Religious laws dictate the life style of non-religious israeli citizens.
Yup, and something Shinui is fighting to change. Also note, the laws
only affect non-religious Jews. Arab stores have their own hours,
Rabbis have no control over marriages of other religions, and each
religion has its own freedoms.
Even so, explain how laws about when Jewish stores can be open
violates a democracy. Did the old Massachusetts (and other States)
Blue Laws mean the US wasn't a democracy? If the Knesset ever wishes
to take the power away from the Rabbis it can. That's democracy.
Unlike Iran where the religious council has absolute authority and
power.
A rather pathetic attempt at making store hours a description of
life-style. Childish and hardly worth the reply.
Hmm, the statement was about the Rabbinical control over aspects of
every day Jewish life here. I addressed one aspect of it. That you
didn't comprehend the issue or the reply is not at all surprising.
That you had nothing to add to or detract from my statement is also no
shock.
Even today, after 50 years of independence israel has no constitution.
England's been a nation much longer and still has no constitution.
Both have a basic set of laws that count as a constitution. In Israel,
they're not surprisingly called the Basic Laws
(http://www.jcpa.org/dje/articles/const-intro-93.htm)
Now please explain to me how England isn't a democracy because it
lacks a constitution.
A simple explaination, it should be right up your alley then,
Constitutions are declarations of rights for a state's citizenry, they
don't define a democracy, they lay out the rights of the citizens and
are supposed to create universality for the citizens. That is why
Zionists will never be able to create a Constitution, unless they
complete their ethnic cleansing of the state.
Interesting but completely off topic. Try, puppy, to address the
issue. Neither England no Israel have a constitution such as the
single US document. Both, however, have Basic laws that legally act as
a constitution, setting out rights of citizens. Now, little one,
please explain how your semantically empty statement at all addressed
the question: Is England a democracy?
30% of all people under israeli control do not enjoy civil, or even human
rights.
And if those 30% wanted peace, there wouldn't be Israeli control. That
point adds nothing to your argument but rather proves that its the
folks trying to destroy Israel that don't believe in democracy.
A complete lack of answering the 30% rights issue, and an obvious
reply of a Zionist, a classic example of a self-fulfilling paranoid
delusion.
No, it directly addressed it. But I wouldn't expect an anti-semite to
be able to understand simple issues such as "cart", "horse" and which
goes first.
Parts of the education system are controlled by the secret services.
Right puppy. Check your tin foil hat, it's slipping.
80% of israel's resources belong to 10% of it's citizens (The Russians no
doubt!)
Any shred of proof of that one? Meanwhile, in most of the developed
world -- The USA, England, other parts of Western Europe -- that
percentage is usual or even low. The wealthy are wealthy because,
believe it or not, they control more of the wealth than those who are
not wealthy. That, however, doesn't obviate the concept of democracy.
Rampant capitalism is far from being a democractic institution,
Who said it was? Oh, that's right, Yas used the percentage of wealth
to define a democracy. I pointed out that many "democracies" have a
higher concentration of wealth than Israel. It 'aint rocket science,
puppy. Take a course on logic. It would help.
capitalism in itself is more a dictorial institution, where the power
focuses into larger and larger corporations controlled by the
officers. Something akin to Commmunism where more of the control goes
to the higher ranking party members, in the end corruption
disintigrates the structure. When viewing the corruption of the last
few years in the US, and the ease with which US justice was bought, a
similar situation is taking place in the US.
So you're saying the US isn't a democracy? Depending on your argument,
which you've yet to make, I might even agree with you. You're on a
tract that leads somewhere; can you follow it to a conclusion?
More then 1000 people are held in administrative custody without being
charged, and with no time limits.
Out of more than 3 million folks, by your own statements above? Pretty
low percenage. The non-democracies of the Arab world are much worse.
80% of political prisoiners are held in Muslim countries, while Islam
is only 20% of the world's population. So the democracy of Israel is
doing much better than your friends.
Care to garner a scrap of proof to back your claims?
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1069304427836
And before you get on another "Zionist" ramble, note the author is an
Iranian living in Paris.
Thought not.
No, puppy, you have it backwards. You've not thought.
Like it or not the legal systems in Muslim countries are working, the
crime rates in these countries are miniscule by comparison. In the US
1 in 10 people have been jailed for more than 6 months in their life,
towit they're criminals.
When'd we get from democracy to legal system? Yet more tangents.
Saying you think it's good that dictators chop off hands for stealing
in no way impacts a discussion of whether or not Israel is a
democracy.
And from the group of 3 million that states Israel shouldn't exist and
that the suicide bombings of civilians is just. Yes, I think there are
too many folks in custody without being charged, but again that's a
different point that democracy. It's a question of being in a war
zone. Were prisoners of war in any other war charged in courts of law
or were they held until the end of the war?
When Israel answers to their obvious war crimes, crimes against
humanity, etc. etc. then there maybe an argument made against the
suicide bombers, as of now the Arabs are fighting the overwhelming
oppression with the most effective weapon they have. Self sacrifice in
a war is as old as there was war, most noteably in WWII and Vietnam,
where human bombs were weapons of last resort.
What obvious war crimes? you mean the ones where Israel has defended
itself against countries wages a decades long war on it, calling for
its destructions? Get real and get you distemper shot updated.
israel is the only country that has a law allowing interrogators to use
torture!!!
1) Show me that law. 2) The *N reports torture is regularly used in
Arab countries. As for one additional piece of fun, look at appendix 4
of http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engact400082003. It lists
countries with reported use of electro-torture (including Canada. Yes,
Canada). Look at how many democracies are listed. Also note that
Israel isn't.
Well with that pathetic logic you can then justify the Holocaust.
I'd love to see you attempt that one. Yas claims that Israel is "the
only country that has a law allowing interrogators to use torture." I
point out that Amnesty International says he's lying. Where did I say
it was ok to use torture? Come on, little one, try to show me.
Hardly suprising given the obvious parallels between Zionism and
Nazism.
I'm only surprised it took yoiu anti-semite that long to try to pop up
that false analogy.
All mass media channels are held by a handful of families.
Have you heard of Rupert Murdoch? How about the tight control of media
by governments and corporations in Europe and the US? Meanwhile, if
you lived here you'd know how many international stations are on cable
and satellite. If I understood Arabic I could watch news from Egypt,
Jordan (actually they also broadcast in English), Syria and elsewhere.
We get CNN, FoxNews, BBC, Skynews and Russian news.
Show me an Arab country where most people can get more than the
government's media or a democracy with more access to international
information.
The remark about control of media is most likely a reference about the
control of the majority of minds in a supposedly free country, and the
vast majority of the population watches the mainstream media.
Huh? Your tin foil hat is slipping. More symantically nil wanderings.
in israel, the government has the right to shut down a newspaper.
Nope, but it does have the right to censor papers. Is Germany not a
democracy because it has laws that can shut down cults, people who
espouse violent anti-semitism, and for other reasons? Is England not a
democracy because the government says no English media can discuss the
rumours Prince Charles' possible bisexual activities?
Censorship is just another divergence from Freedom of the Press,
religating the truth to something that the government controls, a
clear parallel is with Nazism and Communism.
Are you aware that none of the Constitutional Amendments are superior
to others and that there is no unlimited Freedom of the Press in any
country? I doubt it.
Non Jewish citizens are forbidden from buying state owned land.
No, puppy, everyone's forbidden from buying state owned land. That's
why it is State owned. It is held in trust for the people and by the
Basic Laws (remember them?) can't be sold.
However, Jews and non-Jews alike have leased State owned land.
What a wonderful "democracy"
Once again all you've shown is that anti-zionism is just Newspeak for
anti-semitism. All you can do is ignore reality and lie in order to
push your message of hate.
Mindless obedience is what you're displaying, the oppressive socialist
movements of the last century were laden full with folks like
yourself, your latent racism is now displayed for all.
I provide facts and arguments, you provide empty rhetoric and hate,
and I'm the one showing "mindless obedience"? That's the laugh of the
day. You don't even seem to understand the workings of your own
government and you're trying to comment on othes.
Also, if you'd read many of my posts on soc.culture.israel you'd have
a clue what my opinion is about the oppressive socialist movement in
Israel.
Ahhhh the
wonders of the internet, Zionist filth like yourself can no longer
hide the evil deeds. The time is coming to an end for the US and
Israel's reign of terror, the corrupt systems will cave in on
themselves over the next decade. Who knows, at the end of it all
democracy may take hold in these two nations as well, you never know.
:-)
.
|
|
|
| User: "JGB" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
08 Dec 2003 06:07:50 PM |
|
|
David T <icne2469nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<2rj9tvcq26jna36kklo7no4p65jiplj29e@4ax.com>...
On 7 Dec 2003 14:35:33 -0800,
(DosesOfReality3) wrote:
David T <icne2469nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<49n1tvojd51cg55cqd6pqlddid1045mf7s@4ax.com>...
Though I don't expect it, I do request you to quit your repeated
lying.
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:37:57 -0000, "Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Exactly how? People of all religions are citizens, vote and have equal
rights. That's separation.
A clear seperation is apparent when you view the squawlor and
discriminaton against the Arabs. Government jobs, funding for housing,
infrastucture and the like are all distributed along ethnic lines.<
The "squalor" was there long before the Jews came, but you can find
similar squalor in poor Jewish neighborhoods as well. And most of the
Christian ARabs are richer than Jews in Israel. Why? Because they don't
have a dozen kids like the Muslims and pay their taxes. The Arabs
don't go the army, have 4 times as many kids as the Jews, pay minimal
taxes and are less educated, but know how to complain. That they know
how to do.
The vast majority of poor in the US are black. <
Not anymore. That's ancient history.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ariel" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
05 Dec 2003 02:37:01 PM |
|
|
great replies David
you destroyed one by one the lies of the poor ignorant Yass .
"David T" <icne2469nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:49n1tvojd51cg55cqd6pqlddid1045mf7s@4ax.com...
Though I don't expect it, I do request you to quit your repeated
lying.
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:37:57 -0000, "Yas" <spam@127.0.0.1> wrote:
The Only "Democracy" in the Middle East where..
No Separation between religion and state.
Exactly how? People of all religions are citizens, vote and have equal
rights. That's separation.
Non Jews are discriminated in most areas.
Not true. Arabs are often discriminated against, but every democracy
has problems with discrimination. You charge means there are no
democracies. Actually there aren't, just forms of democratic
republics, but that's probably beyone you.
Religious laws dictate the life style of non-religious israeli citizens.
Yup, and something Shinui is fighting to change. Also note, the laws
only affect non-religious Jews. Arab stores have their own hours,
Rabbis have no control over marriages of other religions, and each
religion has its own freedoms.
Even so, explain how laws about when Jewish stores can be open
violates a democracy. Did the old Massachusetts (and other States)
Blue Laws mean the US wasn't a democracy? If the Knesset ever wishes
to take the power away from the Rabbis it can. That's democracy.
Unlike Iran where the religious council has absolute authority and
power.
Even today, after 50 years of independence israel has no constitution.
England's been a nation much longer and still has no constitution.
Both have a basic set of laws that count as a constitution. In Israel,
they're not surprisingly called the Basic Laws
(http://www.jcpa.org/dje/articles/const-intro-93.htm)
Now please explain to me how England isn't a democracy because it
lacks a constitution.
30% of all people under israeli control do not enjoy civil, or even human
rights.
And if those 30% wanted peace, there wouldn't be Israeli control. That
point adds nothing to your argument but rather proves that its the
folks trying to destroy Israel that don't believe in democracy.
Parts of the education system are controlled by the secret services.
Right puppy. Check your tin foil hat, it's slipping.
80% of israel's resources belong to 10% of it's citizens (The Russians no
doubt!)
Any shred of proof of that one? Meanwhile, in most of the developed
world -- The USA, England, other parts of Western Europe -- that
percentage is usual or even low. The wealthy are wealthy because,
believe it or not, they control more of the wealth than those who are
not wealthy. That, however, doesn't obviate the concept of democracy.
More then 1000 people are held in administrative custody without being
charged, and with no time limits.
Out of more than 3 million folks, by your own statements above? Pretty
low percenage. The non-democracies of the Arab world are much worse.
80% of political prisoiners are held in Muslim countries, while Islam
is only 20% of the world's population. So the democracy of Israel is
doing much better than your friends.
And from the group of 3 million that states Israel shouldn't exist and
that the suicide bombings of civilians is just. Yes, I think there are
too many folks in custody without being charged, but again that's a
different point that democracy. It's a question of being in a war
zone. Were prisoners of war in any other war charged in courts of law
or were they held until the end of the war?
israel is the only country that has a law allowing interrogators to use
torture!!!
1) Show me that law. 2) The *N reports torture is regularly used in
Arab countries. As for one additional piece of fun, look at appendix 4
of http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engact400082003. It lists
countries with reported use of electro-torture (including Canada. Yes,
Canada). Look at how many democracies are listed. Also note that
Israel isn't.
All mass media channels are held by a handful of families.
Have you heard of Rupert Murdoch? How about the tight control of media
by governments and corporations in Europe and the US? Meanwhile, if
you lived here you'd know how many international stations are on cable
and satellite. If I understood Arabic I could watch news from Egypt,
Jordan (actually they also broadcast in English), Syria and elsewhere.
We get CNN, FoxNews, BBC, Skynews and Russian news.
Show me an Arab country where most people can get more than the
government's media or a democracy with more access to international
information.
in israel, the government has the right to shut down a newspaper.
Nope, but it does have the right to censor papers. Is Germany not a
democracy because it has laws that can shut down cults, people who
espouse violent anti-semitism, and for other reasons? Is England not a
democracy because the government says no English media can discuss the
rumours Prince Charles' possible bisexual activities?
Non Jewish citizens are forbidden from buying state owned land.
No, puppy, everyone's forbidden from buying state owned land. That's
why it is State owned. It is held in trust for the people and by the
Basic Laws (remember them?) can't be sold.
However, Jews and non-Jews alike have leased State owned land.
What a wonderful "democracy"
Once again all you've shown is that anti-zionism is just Newspeak for
anti-semitism. All you can do is ignore reality and lie in order to
push your message of hate.
.
|
|
|
| User: "David T" |
|
| Title: Re: The only Democracy in the Middle East |
06 Dec 2003 02:05:40 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 13:37:01 -0700, "Ariel" <arielv2@37.com> wrote:
great replies David
you destroyed one by one the lies of the poor ignorant Yass .
Yeah, but ignorance and hate know no limites. I'm sure he'll repost
the same dreck in two months, hoping nobo | | | |