The Race of Genesis 10
Jeremiah 50:37-39
37: A sword is upon their horses, and upon their chariots,
AND UPON ALL THE MINGLED PEOPLE that are in the midst of
her; and they shall become as women: a sword is upon her
treasures; and they shall be robbed.
38: A drought is upon her waters; and they shall be dried
up: for it is the land of graven images, and they are mad
upon their idols.
39: Therefore the wild beasts of the desert with the wild
beasts of the islands shall dwell there, and the owls shall
dwell therein: and it shall be no more inhabited for ever;
neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation.
Ezekiel 30:5
5: Ethiopia, and Libya, and Lydia, AND ALL THE MINGLED
PEOPLE, and Chub, and the men of the land that is in league,
shall fall with them by the sword.
To briefly revisit the Asian portion of Kush, in his book
The Lost Tribes, pp. 148-150, Dr. Moore proposes that the
word "Kush" may be the underlying root of "Khazar" and
"Cossack" (Kush, Kosa, etc.), and hence the ancestors of
those people which later became prominent, and among those
set to fulfill the destiny set for them in Ezekiel 38 and
other prophecies are very likely revealed.
Surely Mitsrayim, or Mizraim, is Egypt. Where the Old
Testament reads "Egypt," in all places the Hebrew reads
"Mitsrayim." The term "Egypt" is that used throughout Greek
literature, "Aegyptus." Mitsrayim was not Egypt as we know
it, but only a much smaller district along both banks of the
Nile. The early Greeks seem to have written little about
Egypt outside of Thebes and Heliopolis, although we sill
have reading to do in that period so can't comment fully on
the matter.
This is much to be said about early Egypt that is beyond
the scope of this discussion, but warrants at least a
mention. First, early Egypt actually consisted of several
alien cultures adverse to one another and eventually
amalgamated, which was surely not a good idea. The pharaonic
civilization in Egypt appeared rather suddenly, not long
after 3000 B.C., consistent with Septuagint chronology.
There were actually two groups in early Egypt, centuries
apart, remembered as "Hyksos." The first group little is
known about, a noble Adamic race, probably Shemites and
maybe even Hebrew, who built the Great Pyramid. The second
were the Kenites who invaded and occupied the Delta shortly
before the Genesis account of Joseph. During the time of
Joseph, the Pharaohs at Thebes were of the House of Shem, as
was the priesthood of On (Helipolis or Beth-Shemesh). It was
these Egyptians whom Joseph was sold to as a slave.
There are nearly 1800 years between the time of Noah's
Flood and the writing of the Pentateuch, and about 800 more
to the time of Ezekiel and Jeremiah; all of this time the
various tribes of Adamites were seeking new and better land
throughout the known world and points beyond. With so few
written records, how difficult it is to determine their
movement. Homer, the earliest Greek writer we know of, was
contemporary with Hosea and Isaiah, rather late in the
history of Israel.
It is difficult to discern why the name Phut was associated
with Libya (see Nahum 3:9), and in the Septuagint, as well
as the A.V., it was translated as such in Ezekiel 30:5;
38:5; Jeremiah 46:9 (LXX 26:9). The Lubim (hence "Libya")
and Sukkim (2 Chronicles 12:3) may have been pre-Adamic
(aboriginal) people, and it may well be that our writers of
Scripture knew that Phut had mingled with these. Like Kush,
Phut is listed among "all the mingled people" in Ezekiel
30:5.
Diodorus Siculus (20:55) writes of Libyans dwelling on
Africa's northern coast, in cities, and friendly to
Carthage, but then of the nomadic "Lyvians" of the interior,
hostile to Carthage. He does not, however, describe Libyan
of Carthaginian physically. Hesoid, probably a contemporary
of Isaiah, writing in his "Catalogues of Women" (fragment
40A) mentions both the "boundless black-skins and the
Lybians" but says that from Epaphus, son of Chronos, "sprang
the dark Libyans and high souled Ethiopians," but also the
"under-ground folk and feeble-souled Ethiopians," but also
the "under-ground folk and feeble pygmies."
Surely the more reliable early source may be Aeschylus (a
writer contemporary with Ezra and Nehemiah). Who in
"Suppliant Maidens" at lines 277-290 lists a group of races
and compares the likeness of their women to those of the
(Greek") Danaans, among those mentioned being Libyans,
Egyptians and Amazons, very likely indicating some degree of
homogenization among these people. Aeschylus is relating a
parody of events which transpired a thousand years before
his own time: the migration of Dan from Egypt to Greece.
In this age we have a mixed race, the Berberrs, as evidence
of a former White civilization in this region, although the
settlements of the Phoenicians, the later Germanic invaders
of Carthage, the Vandals, and then the rise of Mohammedism
all did much to further confound an already mingled North
African world.
Mitsraim, Kush, and Phut, the Ludim of Genesis 10:13 (not
of Lud the son of Shem discussed below), and the Lubim
verses (sometimes with other people): Ezekiel 2:10; 390:5;
38:5; Nahum 3:9; 2 Chronicles 12:3 and 16:8. Since Ezekiel
38 is unfulfilled, it may be clear that the Arab (meaning
"mixed" see Strongs #6154, the result of which is described
in Strong's #6150) peoples descended from them will be
opposed to the children of Israel (not the "Jews") in the
last days.
The Anamin of Genesis 10:13 are likely the "Anami"
mentioned in an 8th century B.C., cuneiform inscription.
Naphtuhim may be a word borrowed from Egyptian meaning
"people of the delta," Pathrusim "people of the southern
land."
The Philistim, or Philistines, had dwelt in the land of
Caphtor before their own migration to Palestine (an
unrelated word), and Caphtor was very probably in Egypt. See
Amos 9:7; Deuteronomy 2:23 and Jeremiah 47:4. Certainly the
Philistines were Adamic (Zechariah 9:6), and some had surely
migrated west with the children of Israel (Isaiah 11:14).
Goliath was not actually a Philistine, but rather a
mercenary in their army, one of the sons of Rapha the
Canaanite giant. Of which see 1 Chronicles 20:4-6, where
"the giant" is in Hebrew ha-rapha, the source of the Rephaim
(i.e., Genesis 14:5; 15:20; 2 Samuel 5:18; 23:13).
There also should be noted an obscure entry in Herodotus,
at 2:128:
"Hence they (the Egyptians) commonly call the pyramids
after Philition, a shepherd who at that time fed his flocks
about the place."
Some suppose that this may be a memory of ancient
Philistines in Egypt, and the first "shepherd kings,"
connected to the building of the Great Pyramid.
With Nimrod we may very well have mention of both the first
Adamite tyrant, a man who would rule over his kin outside of
the laws of God, and the first multi cultural "empire,"
since the cities mentioned had long existed and were
populated with peoples of other races. There is much
evidence that the beginnings of "western" civilization
appeared rather suddenly here in Mesopotamia, by which the
Genesis 11 account has much creditworthiness once it is
realized that this represents the beginning of the White
Race, AND NOT ALL RACES.
Genesis 10:15-19
Genesis 10:15-19
15: And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth,
16: And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite,
17: And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,
18: And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite:
and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread
abroad.
19: And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as
thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom,
and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha.
Canaan, Ham's youngest son, was cursed by Noah. The reason
why Canaan, and not Ham himself and his other sons, was
cursed should be apparent reading Leviticul 20:11. Canaan
was the result of Ham's illicit behavior; warranting his
special mention at Genesis 9:18. Canaan's descendants are
later found mixed with the race of Cain (Genesis 4:16-26;
15:19-21; Deuteronomy 7:1-2), who was also cursed (Genesis
4:10-15), and several races with no Biblical genealogy,
indicating that they are of non-Adamic (non-white) origin.
Some of the "ites" here in Genesis 10:16-18 also may well
be of non-Adamic stock, races that the Canaanites mixed with
rather than races which sprung from Canaanites mixed with
rather than races which sprung from Canaan. The "Hivites"
may actually, in all occurrences, be a Scribal error for
"Horities," evident by comparing Genesis 36:2, 20, 30, and
also the LXX at Genesis 34:2 and Joshua 9:7.
The Horites, Hurrians to the anthropologists and
archaeologists today, are an Oriental race which invaded
Mesopotamia at an early date. Some Horites dwelt at "Mount
Hor," to which the Edomites, the descendants of Esau, and
also cursed, joined themselves. Mount Hor was later called
Mount Seir, and today is known as Petra in Jordan. See
Genesis 36
All of these people aforementioned may be traced to the
people we call "Jews" today, although many are also among
the "Arabs." See Matthew 23:35; Luke 11:57; John 8:33-47;
Romans 9:1-13; and Josephus' Antiquities 13:9:1 (13:254-58),
13:15:8 (13:395-97), 15:7:9-10 (15:253-66) and Wars 2:20:4
(2:566-68), 2:8:2 (2:119-121) and 4:4:4 (4:270-73)
Heth was a precursor to the people who were later known as
Hittites, probably a pre-Adamic tribe whom Heth had settled
with, and therefore named by the rest of the Adamic race.
The name Sidon is found in the city in Canaan of the same
name, and its environs. Seen hundred years before the Greeks
first wrote of "Phoenicians," the Canaanites of Tyre and
Sidon and the rest of the coast were driven out by the
children of Israel, who then inhabited those cities. The
"Phoenicians" were Israelites!
Summary of What Has Been Presented
This concludes for this part of the study the notes by
William Finck, along with some of our own appended
observations.
If you have followed very closely what has been presented
here, you are probably beginning to acquire a concept of how
serious a problem we are facing today concerning race. As
has been pointed out RACE is at the very heart of the agenda
of the enemy. Additionally, by understanding our past in a
greater light, we can observe more thoroughly and with
better perception the process which is happening in our
world today before our very eyes.
It should also be comprehended by all White People that the
present race-mixing phenomena we are confronted with was
designed and advocated as far back as prior to the Civil
War. As a matter of fact, that is what the Civil War was all
abut. But, as one can quickly observe from this lesson, its
origin goes back beyond, and is linked with Genesis 3:15 in
the Garden of Eden.
While we do not agree fully with Philip Jones in his book
Racial Hybridity, (and he being at the opposite end of the
spectrum to his brother, Stephen E. Jones), we cite, in
part, a couple of passages from the chapter "The Challenge
To Destroy The White Race," on pages 215 and 217:
"One of the foremost exponents of race-mixing was David
Croly (1829-1889). His book Miscegenation honestly informs
us of the reasons behind the Civil War and giving Negroes
‘rights.' Croly admits:
‘It is idle to maintain that this present (Civil) war is
not a war for the Negro. It is (indeed) a war for the Negro.
Not simply for his personal rights or his physical
freedom...it is a war, if you please, of amalgamation, so
called...a war looking, as its final fruit, to the blending
of the white and black...Let it go on until...church...
state...society recognize...the necessity of the fusion of
the white and black.'...
‘The ideal or type (of) man of the future will blend in
himself all that is a passionate and emotional in the darker
races, all that is imaginative and spiritual in the Asiatic
races, and all that is intellectual and perceptive in the
White races. He will also be composite as regards color. The
purest Miscegen will be brown, with reddish cheeks, curly
and waving hair, dark eyes, and a fullness and suppleness of
form not now dreamed of by any individual people."
Is this what you want for your children and grand
children????
http://www.israelect.com/reference/Willie-Martin/
.
|
