| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Flowerchild8245" |
| Date: |
19 Oct 2006 07:00:42 AM |
| Object: |
The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
The great book of Revelation is a book of symbols, and it is not beside
what Jesus said and did, but goes hand in hand with what the Son of God
said and did, before and after His ascension, a masterpiece of poetic
symbolism that truly can be thought of as the "Testimony of Jesus
Christ", because it is "the testimony of Jesus Christ"! A book of
symbols that describe His coming into power and bringing the kingdom of
God unto all mankind.
Consider what is written of the Book and when. It is the time of
fulfillment for Daniel's book. Daniel's book was sealed for the "end
times", was not Revelation was not sealed because "the time was at hand
for all to be fulfilled". So, what is Revelation it all about? This
verse is a great intro, right there on page one the whole time! :
(ALL CAPS for emphasis, not shouting)
*(KJV) Rev 1:1-3 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto
him, to show unto his servants things which must SHORTLY COME TO PASS
[G5034] ; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant
John: Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of
Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw. Blessed is he that
readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those
things which are written therein: FOR THE TIME IS AT HAND [G1451].
It is "The testimony of Jesus Christ", The unveiling and revealing of
ALL things pertaining to Christ.
Is the book pertaining to the past, or the future? As I see it, This
verse says it all:
*(KJV)Rev 1:19 Write the things which thou hast [seen], and the things
which [are], and the things which shall be [hereafter]
What had John seen at this point? He had turned around and seen the
Lord. And John had also walked with the Lord, he seen it all! John was
also told to write of things that "ARE" as well, things that were, and
were happening right then as this was being spoken in the first
century. Also, John was told to write of things that were to be
thereafter, And these things were to happen "SHORTLY". It is the most
important and common theme in Revelation. Have you ever noticed these
things when reading Revelation?
It is written:
*(KJV)Rev 1:1-3 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto
him, to show unto his servants things which must SHORTLY COME TO PASS
[G5034] ; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant
John: Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus
Christ, and of all things that he saw. Blessed is he that readeth, and
they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which
are written therein: FOR THE TIME IS AT HAND [G1451].
*(KJV)Rev 22:6 And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and
true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to show unto
his servants the things which must SHORTLY BE DONE [G5034] .
*(KJV)Rev 22:10 And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the
prophecy of this book: FOR THE TIME IS AT HAND [G1451]
The TIME is "at hand" does mean "NEAR":
G1451 "At hand"- (Strong's Concordance):
=CE=B5=CC=93=CE=B3=CE=B3=CF=85=CC=81=CF=82
eggus
eng-goos'
From a primary verb =CE=B1=CC=93=CC=81=CE=B3=CF=87=CF=89 agcho=CC=84 (to sq=
ueeze or throttle; akin
to the base of G43); near (literally or figuratively, of place or
time): - from, at hand, near, nigh (at hand, unto), ready.
And "shortly" come to PASS does mean - "A BRIEF SPACE OF TIME ":
G5034 "shortly"- (Strong's Concordance):
=CF=84=CE=B1=CC=81=CF=87=CE=BF=CF=82
tachos
takh'-os
From the same as G5036; a brief space (of time), that is, (with G1722
prefixed) in haste: - + quickly, + shortly, + speedily.
The Urgency
Daniel's book was sealed for a later fulfillment, but as for the great
book of Revelation, John was told not to seal it...Why? Because the
things were to SHORTLY COME TO PASS, the TIME was "ready", "a place of
time", and the time was "soon" for all that was written to be
filfilled. There was an urgency about it, the thunderous sound of
"imminence" throughout.
URGENT!
Rev.1:1--The apostle John was shown that those things being revealed to
him in The Apocalypse were ALL:
"things which WOULD SHORTLY TAKE PLACE.
Here, John admonishes those 1st century disciples to:
"heed the things which are written in it; FOR THE TIME IS NEAR (Vs.3).
Rev.2:16--To the church at Pergamum, John was instructed to write:
"Repent therefore; or else I AM COMING QUICKLY..."
Rev.2:25--To the church at Thyatira, John was told to write:
"=2E..Hold fast UNTIL I COME."
Rev.3:10,11--To the church at Philadelphia, he was instructed to write:
"Because you have kept the word of My perseverance, I also will keep
you from the hour of testing which is ABOUT TO COME upon the whole
world (land) to test those who dwell upon the earth (land). I AM COMING
QUICKLY; hold fast what you have, in order that no one take your
crown."
Rev.22:6,7--John wrote that:
"These words are faithful and true; and the Lord, the God of the
spirits of the prophets, sent His angel to show to His bond-servants,
the things WHICH MUST SHORTLY TAKE PLACE. And behold, I AM COMING
QUICKLY."
Rev.22:10--John was warned by the angel:
"Do NOT seal up the words of the prophecy of this book; FOR THE TIME IS
NEAR."
Rev.22:12--John was told to write:
"Behold, I AM COMING QUICKLY!"
Rev.22:20--And finally, John testified that Jesus said, "Yes, I AM
COMING QUICKLY."
Dear person, if you followed all the many warnings in Revelation, by
both the angel and also The Lord Jesus Himself, you certainly would
have taken notice of one inescapable fact and that is the thunderous
sound of "imminence" of our Lord's coming. With the many expressions
such as: "Things that must soon take place; the time is at hand;
behold, I am coming quickly," how could we see the many expressions
like that, and yet come away with the understanding that they are
things that are yet 20 centuries into their future?
Let's suppose for just a moment that Jesus definitely wanted the 1st
century readers of the Apocalypse to understand that His coming was
imminent; that He was even going to come in their generation. What sort
of things do you suppose He could say so as to best convey that
message? Well, I would think that an expression such as: "These are
things that must shortly come to pass" would be good. Surely, He could
say: "The time is at hand, or near!" Or, He could even say: "Behold I
am coming quickly!" Please don't think that I am trying to be a
"wise-guy" here! I'm only pleading that we allow His Word to simply
interpret itself! That's all!
(Luk 21:22) For these be the days of vengeance, that ALL things which
are written may be fulfilled.
(Mat 23:36) TRULY, I SAY TO YOU, ALL THESE THINGS WILL COME UPON THIS
GENERATION.
Jesus said to His servants and Apostles everything must "shortly come
to pass", "the time is at hand", and "the time is fulfilled", "some
standing here that shall not taste of death", "this generation shall
not pass until all be fulfilled", "before you can go over the cities of
Israel", all meaning "quickly" or "without delay", or "shortly to be
done", "within a brief space of time", or be done "soon".
Yet many will still insist that "shortly come to pass", "the time is at
hand", and "the time is fulfilled", "some standing here that shall not
taste of death", "this generation shall not pass until all be
fulfilled", "before you can go over the cities of Israel", all meaning
"quickly" or "without delay", or "shortly to be done", "within a brief
space of time", or be done "soon"... means thousands of years in the
future? What's up with that?
PART TWO- The dating of Revelation.
Did you know the only evidence for a 96 AD dating is hearsay? It is
hearsay because Irenaeus says NOTHING about when John began the first
scroll and finished the last scroll while in prison on the island of
Patmos! And it is hearsay because Irenaeus did not witness John, he
referred to Polycarp who supposedly knew the apostle John.
However there is Biblical evidence as to when it John sent out the
first scroll to the seven Churches that were in Asia in the first
century, a specific group of churches in Asia (Revelation 1:4). The
importance of this statement cannot be overlooked (even though it has
been by many scholars). There is only one small window of time in which
there wereonly seven churches in Asia. The early AD 60's.
The apostle Paul established nine churches in that area, but only seven
were addressed in Revelation. The reason for this is that the cities of
Colosse, Hierapolis, and Laodicea, were all destroyed by an earthquake
around AD 61. Laodicea was rebuilt soon afterwards, but the other two
cities were not. This left only seven churches in Asia during the five
years just prior to the beginning of the Roman/Jewish war that took
place in the first century, from roughly 66.5 AD, to 70 AD (which is
3=2E5 years, see Daniel).
This statement, even with all of this uncertainty, is the *_ONLY_*
evidence used to support the "late date" theory. It has been accepted
by generations of people without really questioning it or examining it
in light of the book itself. The late date has been passed on to us in
the same way it was passed on to Eusebius, "=E2=80=A6it [was] handed down by
tradition=E2=80=A6". Tradition is not the way to interpret Scripture. (:
Those who hold to the "late date," have Revelation written during the
time of Domitian Caesar (AD 95-96). This date is determined by the
following statement by Irenaeus (AD 130 to AD 202), as quoted by
Eusebius, the church historian, in AD 325:
"We will not, however, incur the risk of pronouncing positively as to
the name of Antichrist; for if it were necessary that his name should
be distinctly revealed in this present time, it would have been
announced by him who beheld the apocalyptic vision. For it was seen no
very long time since, but almost in our day, towards the end of
Domitian's reign."
There are things about this statement that need to be noted.First,
Irenaeus did not witness this. He referred to Polycarp (who supposedly
knew the apostle John). Secondly, the key part - "it is not long since
it was seen", is ambiguous. According to Irenaeus' recollection,
Polycarp saw "it" sometime in AD 95-96, during the last part Domitian's
reign. Thirdly, we do not know if the "it" Polycarp was referring to
was John, the visions he saw, the name of "Antichrist", or the book
itself.
Even more, even if it was a scroll of Revelation, or the entire book
that Polycarp had seen, that only means it was seen, and if it was
seen, it was surely written sometime before. So that in no way means it
was written in 96 AD!
Furthermore, it comes to us through three people separated by three
centuries. Simply put, this is hear-say.
There were also many others who had witnessed of an earlier date. Here
are a few:
Epiphanies (A. D. 315-403)
States Revelation was written under "Claudius [Nero] Caesar."
(Epiphanies, Heresies 51:12,)
Arethas (A.D. 850-984)
(On Revelation 7:4) "When the Evangelist received these oracles, the
destruction in which the Jews were involved was not yet inflicted by
the Romans."
Henry Cowles (1881)
"On the other hand the Syriac translation of the Apocalypse has this
superscription: "The Revelation which was made by God to John the
Evangelist in the Island of Patmos to which he was banished by Nero the
Emperor.'' "This superscription seems to testify, to a current
tradition in Syria at least as far back as his day, assuming the date
of the book to the age of Nero. Of later witnesses, Andreas of
Cappadocia [flourished about A. D. 500], in a commentary on this book,
favors the Neronian date".
I say it took many years for John to complete his work, even sneaking
out scrolls from prison via respectful Christian guards and visitors,
especially getting out the urgent letters to the seven assemblies that
were in Asia. I say evidence points toward John beginning in early 60's
AD, and finishing the last scroll by 69 AD. I wouldn't be suprised if
it took seven years of prison time to complete. The LORD do work in
mysterious ways, and it was no accident John was exiled into privacy,
seclusion, and even safety, but for to remain and see it all come to
pass, for He was the Apostle who remained!
PART THREE- SYMBOLS:
Now your thinking "When did this or that happen!", to which I would say
"I understand!" There are many questions! I have asked alot of
questions! Please keep in mind, often times as the Spirit speaks, all
is not as it seems, this is evident in the Old and New Testaments. Pray
for understanding, cry out for it, and just stay in the word everyday,
don't go anywhere else for truth, because everyday in the word is a
good day.
And please consider this carefully. Here are many of the words from the
book of Revelation used as SYMBOLS:
candlesticks
horses
locusts
beasts
birds
animals
dragons
heads
horns
teeth
tails
eyes
mouths
wings
hair
feet
hands
foreheads
odours
books
gold
seals
crowns
names
cities
nations
kings
tongues
Nicolaitans
Antipas
Armageddon
Balaam
Balak
Abaddon
Apollyon
Babylon
Sodom
Egypt
Jezebel
book of life
tree of live
water of life
hours
days
months
seasons
rod of iron
sickle
bow
blades
swords
reap
harvest
grass
trees
thrones
garments
robes
signs
images
wonders
marks
numbers
vials
trumpets
winds
rivers
lakes
seas
waters
clouds
floods
mountains
islands
lightnings
voices
thunders
earthquakes
hails
songs
winepresses
grapes
wine
balances
wheat
barley
oil
eyesalve
pebbles
manna
wreaths
palm fronds
whores
harlots
fornications
keys
doors
temples
synagogues
pillars
rich
poor
blind
naked
hot
cold
lukewarm
blood
deaths
fire
sulfur
brimstone
smoke
sun
moon
stars
And even heaven and earth are used as symbols in this great book of
symbols.
Would you like a FREE e-Bible? Download a FREE e-Bible from
<http://www.e-sword.net> After the initial download, ( KJV+, that's a
KJV with Strongs Concordance which is really helpful ), you can add as
many translations as you wish, most any version, most any language,
most helpful is the search tool, FREE add on's, and it works on or off
line. the Sword of the LORD with an electronic edge.
HOME <http://bible-mysteries.blogspot.com/>
.
|
|
| User: "BoD" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
21 Oct 2006 11:00:35 PM |
|
|
Flowerchild8245 wrote:
Fred A Stover wrote:
"Flowerchild8245" <flowerchild8245@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:1161259242.621634.302640@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Duh... continued
The TIME is "at hand" does mean "NEAR":
G1451 "At hand"- (Strong's Concordance):
???????
eggus
eng-goos'
From a primary verb ?????? agcho? (to squeeze or throttle; akin
to the base of G43); near (literally or figuratively, of place or
time): - from, at hand, near, nigh (at hand, unto), ready.
As usual, you ignore the Author and how He uses the words to give them your
definition.
What the Author means by "at hand" is more than just ready. Having a hammer
at hand means I have one ready whether I need it or not. The Author, on the
other hand, uses it to not only indicate that it is ready, but also that it
is certain to occur. "At hand" says nothing of when it will come to be.
That's an invention of your demon.
All has been at hand to be fulfilled from the beginning when it was
determined to be fulfilled. As He says, "I am God at hand" (Jer 23:23). The
time which was at hand in Revelation was at hand for Zephaniah (1:7), for
Joel (1:15), for Ezekiel (36:8), for Isaiah (13:6), and for Moses (Deut.
32:35).
And "shortly" come to PASS does mean - "A BRIEF SPACE OF TIME ":
G5034 "shortly"- (Strong's Concordance):
??????
tachos
takh'-os
From the same as G5036; a brief space (of time), that is, (with G1722
prefixed) in haste: - + quickly, + shortly, + speedily.
Wrong! What is rendered "shortly" is "en tache," and we are being told how
the it will happen, in haste, quickly, not when it will happen.
This is one of the more foolish examples of preterist alleged thought:
Misread the text, assume a hyperliteral interpretation of the auxilary
words, and interpret the plain text as simply symboloic.It;'s demonic, and
it's a very dumb demon.
(Luk 21:22) For these be the days of vengeance, that ALL things which
are written may be fulfilled.
(Mat 23:36) TRULY, I SAY TO YOU, ALL THESE THINGS WILL COME UPON THIS
GENERATION.
ROTFL!!!!
Matthew 23:33
Ye serpents, ye generation [gennema: those generated by Adam, all
mankind] of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
By all our sins going to the cross with:
Matthew 23:36
Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation
[genea, generated by Isarael].
So you say Jesus was saying: "All these things shall come upon this
people generated by Israel"? Perhaps if you explore the many times
Jesus said "this generation", you will hear the Word of God reveal the
gospel truth, that when Jesus said "this generation", He was speaking
of His generation, an "evil", "faithless and twisted", "evil and
adulterous", "adulterous and sinful", and "faithless" generation.
(Luke 17:25) But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of
this generation.
Jesus suffered many things and was rejected by His generation! Jesus
said "this generation" many times in many different ways, not just
once. Here are some examples...Please Hear His words:
(Mat 11:16-19) But whereunto shall I liken this generation? It is like
unto children sitting in the markets, and calling unto their fellows,
And saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have
mourned unto you, and ye have not lamented. For John came neither
eating nor drinking, and they say, He hath a devil. The Son of man came
eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a
winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified
of her children.
Jesus said "what shall I liken this generation", saying John came and
He came, yet both were rejected. John came in the first century, Jesus
came in the first century, Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the generation of the first century.
(Mat 12:41) The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this
generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the
preaching of Jonah; and, behold, a greater than Jonah is here.
Jesus said "this generation" would be judged, because He was there
amongst them and they rejected Him. Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the same who repented not, the generation of the first
century.
(Mat 12:42) The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with
this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost
parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a
greater than Solomon is here.
Jesus said "this generation" would be judged, because He was there
amongst them and they rejected Him. Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the same who repented not, the generation of the first
century.
(Mar 8:12) And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, Why doth this
generation seek after a sign? verily I say unto you, There shall no
sign be given unto this generation.
Jesus said that the only sign His generation would see was simular to
the sign of Jonah, that as Jonah was in the belly of a whale three
days, after three days He would rise from the dead. The sign was given
to them in the first century, "this generation" was in the first
century...
(Luk 11:30) For as Jonah was a sign unto the Ninevites, so shall also
the Son of man be to this generation.
Again:
(Luk 11:50-51) That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from
the foundation of the world, may be required of [this generation]; From
the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between
the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required
of [this generation].
Jesus was scathing the Pharisees and said the blood of all the prophets
"shall be required of this generation", the same generation that
rejected Him, as Jesus reveals here...
(Luk 17:25) But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of
this generation.
Jesus was rejected by His generation, the generation of the first
century. When Jesus said "This generation" in this scripture, and more
than 10 times, He was speaking of His generation. That is the gospel
truth. Jesus spoke of His generation almost 25 times saying just
"generation" as well. Jesus even spoke of His generation in many
PARABLES too, often times, almost everytime, the parables were about
the Pharisees, and they knew it!
Plainly:
(Mat 23:36) TRULY, I SAY TO YOU, ALL THESE THINGS WILL COME UPON THIS
GENERATION.
(Mat 24:34) Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till
all these things be fulfilled.
(Mar 13:30) Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass,
till all these things be done.
(Luk 21:32) Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away,
till all be fulfilled.
(see The figgy fixation of 1948
<http://thetestimonyofjesuschrist.blogspot.com/2006/07/figgy-fixation-of-1948.html>)
Why His generation?
[Isaiah 53:7-8] He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened
not his mouth; like a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and like a
sheep that before its shearers is silent, so he opened not his mouth.
By oppression and judgment he was taken away; and as for his
generation, who considered that he was cut off out of the land of the
living, stricken for the transgression of my people?
[Acts 8:33] In his humiliation justice was denied him. Who can describe
his generation? For his life is taken away from the earth...
That's why. This was the condemnation of His generation:
Jesus said:
John 3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the
world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds
were evil.
Jesus said:
(Luk 21:22) for these are days of vengeance, to fulfill all that is
written.
"Who can describe His generation"?, the generation of the Messiah.
Jesus did quite well, saying "you"- "faithless and twisted"..."evil and
adulterous"..."evil"..."adulterous and sinful"...and "faithless"
generation. That about says it all.
This Age ! This Generation !
G1074
??????
genea
ghen-eh-ah'
From (a presumed derivative of) G1085; a generation;
by implication an age (the period or the persons): -
age, generation, nation, time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrological_age
An astrological age is a time period in astrology which is believed to
cause major changes in the Earth's inhabitants development. It roughly
corresponds to the time taken for the vernal equinox to move through
one of the twelve constellations of the zodiac.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Giant Waffle" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
22 Oct 2006 03:24:18 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:00:35 GMT, while bungee jumping, BoD
<BoD@the-house-of-god.com> shouted thusly:
This Age ! This Generation !
G1074 - genea (ghen-eh-ah') - From (a presumed derivative of)
G1085; a generation; by implication an age (the period or the persons):
- age, generation, nation, time.
Yes, the period or the persons, both of which note
a generation, in the same way that it is common to
use the word.
As Thayer's puts it... "the whole of a people living
at a given time".
Now why you think that Jesus went around trying to confuse
people (especially since we both know that you wouldn't
even try to argue the definition in any other verse), I have
no idea. (:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrological_age
Are you seriously going to try to get us to believe that
an English dictionary from the 21st century, is telling
us the definition of a Greek word, from an ancient,
dead language, called "Koine Greek" and that it really
means, "an astrological age" (seek link name)?
When you intentionally try to change the primary definition
of the word from a Koine Greek dictionary (above), you told
us plainly that you knew that you were lying and that your
concern is not the word of God, but your own personal,
man made doctrine. (:
--
Giant Waffle
<{{{><
My heart rejoices in the Lord; My horn is exalted in the Lord.
I smile at my enemies, because I rejoice in Your salvation.
- 1 Samuel 2:1
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred A Stover" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
22 Oct 2006 03:20:25 PM |
|
|
"Giant Waffle" <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:88amj25rmq1s4hl8or85p96bls8lot295t@4ax.com...
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:00:35 GMT, while bungee jumping, BoD
<BoD@the-house-of-god.com> shouted thusly:
This Age ! This Generation !
G1074 - genea (ghen-eh-ah') - From (a presumed derivative of)
G1085; a generation; by implication an age (the period or the persons):
- age, generation, nation, time.
Yes, the period or the persons, both of which note
a generation, in the same way that it is common to
use the word.
You offer a secondary meaning of the word, and it is one use of the word.
However, the Author is using the primary meaning of the word "what was
generated," using three different words for "generation," each to indicate
the generator of what was generated. The Author uses "gennema" to signify
what was generated by Adam (all mankind). The Author uses "genos," a word
for adopted son, to signify the church brought into the promise by adoption.
The Author uses "genea," a word for natural son, to signify what was
generated by Jacob/Israel.
Matthew 23:33
Ye serpents, ye generation [gennema, mankind generated by Adam] of
vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
Matthew 23:36
Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation
[Jesus, generated by Israel].
Mankind escapes the damnation of hell by their sins coming upon Jesus on the
cross.
1 Peter 2:9
But ye are a chosen generation [genos, the church generated by
adoption], a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye
should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness
into his marvellous light:
The idea is to grasp what the Author is saying, not creating something you
want to hear.
Now why you think that Jesus went around trying to confuse
people (especially since we both know that you wouldn't
even try to argue the definition in any other verse), I have
no idea. (:
The Lord does not confuse people. He uses three different words for a
reason, each means something specific.
His,
--
http://www.geocities.com/alphadiego66medina@sbcglobal.net/index.htm
Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as
a little child, he shall not enter therein. (Mark 10:15)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bod" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
22 Oct 2006 03:41:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 08:24 +0000, Giant Waffle wrote:=20
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:00:35 GMT, while bungee jumping, BoD
<BoD@the-house-of-god.com> shouted thusly:
=20
=20
This Age ! This Generation !
G1074 - genea (ghen-eh-ah') - From (a presumed derivative of)
G1085; a generation; by implication an age (the period or the persons):
- age, generation, nation, time.
=20
Yes, the period or the persons, both of which note
a generation, in the same way that it is common to
use the word.
=20
As Thayer's puts it... "the whole of a people living
at a given time".
Now why you think that Jesus went around trying to confuse
people (especially since we both know that you wouldn't
even try to argue the definition in any other verse), I have
no idea. (:
=20
The problem is, you must use "generation" so as to fit your doctrinal
concept.
However genea (ghen-eh-ah') - From G1085; "a generation by implication",
An Age.
Now if you take off your Thayer's head for a second. You might see
something.
=20
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrological_age
=20
Are you seriously going to try to get us to believe that
an English dictionary from the 21st century, is telling
us the definition of a Greek word, from an ancient,
dead language, called "Koine Greek" and that it really
means, "an astrological age" (seek link name)?
Yes I,am genea is more an "Age" than a "generation".
and here's for why.
MOSES is thought by many to have ushered in the Age of Aries.=20
+/- 2500 BC - 300 BC
The AGE of ARIES was the age of expanding Empires; Chinese, Persian,
Greek and then Roman. Each of these civilizations sought to always bring
more land and territory under their control. These Empires did so by
conquering the indigenous peoples of the lands as they expanded outward.
When Moses threw out the golden calf, he knew it was the end of the
Taurus Age or the fourth age in our present great Age. He instructed his
followers to get rid of the bull, put lambs' blood on the doors, and
place Rams' horns in the temples. By looking at the Master Calendar, the
Mazzaroth, or the Zodiac in the heavens, anyone could see that it was
the dawning of the Age of Aries the ram or lamb. It was the start of the
fifth age in the great Age
AGE OF PISCES
+/- 300 BC - 20?? AD=20
The Age of Pisces has been dominated largely by religion, Christianity
in particular, with its mixture of control by fear, persecution and
spiritual salvation.
The vernal point is the location of the sun in the sidereal zodiac on
the day of the spring equinox. Our present tropical calender and zodiac
places this as 1 degree Aries, when in fact, due to the precession,
every 72 years it is 1 degree backwards in the zodiac. As of February
10, 1983, the longitude of the vernal point was exactly 5 1/2 degrees
Pisces in the sidereal zodiac. For this reason, we live in the
ASTRONOMICAL AGE of Pisces.
The AGE of PISCES is related to WATER and the subconscious mind. All
human bodies are roughly 90% water, we each, must also take in new water
daily. These are two very important similarities between all Homo
Sapiens. "We" are all connected in several other ways too!
The AGE of PISCES was a period when "evil" or the "dark side" of the
Human Mind controlled civilization. FEAR has been humanity's primary
motivation to act, for over two thousands years.=20
Unreasonable FEAR showing its ugly head in the last decade or so.
That is why wise Ancient's hid as much valuable information as possible,
to preserve it. They knew society was going into long term decline and
much of the important stuff would be destroyed or misinterpreted,
intentionally and unintentionally.=20
The beginning of AGE of PISCES should be dated from the Birth of Buddha.
Buddha came from an angel. That was several hundred years before Jesus
Christ was born from a virgin. The AGE of PISCES is best characterized
by the above two guys, their spiritual philosophy's and Mohamed. 3 great
religions have come upon Earth during the AGE of PISCES, Buddhism,
Christianity and Islam.
Christianity has come to dominate the planet during the AGE of PISCES
because of it's inherent violence. Along with it's hypocrisy and GREED.
Christian's shouldn't be to worried about remaining in power because the
Moslems are following the examples set by the ruling Christians.
The WORLD has been at WAR since the beginning of the PISCES AGE. During
this period Many cruel things were done to human beings by their fellow
Humans. Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Radovan Karadzic,
genocide in AFRICA Spanish Inquisition and Bush have killed hundreds of
millions of people.
AGE OF AQUARIUS ENLIGHTENMENT AND PERSONAL FREEDOM
The precession of the equinoxes has to do with more than just the two
different zodiac systems. As the equinoxes precess, they relate to the
Great Ages of Man. These Ages mark different periods where significant
evolutionary changes have occurred. The Ages are defined by the Sidereal
Sign that is the current location of the Vernal Point.=20
Currently, the Spring Equinox (0=C2=B0 of Aries in the Tropical Zodiac)
occurs at about 7=C2=B0 of the Sidereal Sign of Pisces and we will be in th=
e
Sign of Pisces until the Spring Equinox processes into the Sidereal Sign
of Aquarius, which marks the beginning of the Age of Aquarius. (Even
agreeing on this definition of the "Ages" there is much dispute as to
the actual year that the "Age of Aquarius" begins/began.
When you intentionally try to change the primary definition
of the word from a Koine Greek dictionary (above), you told
us plainly that you knew that you were lying and that your
concern is not the word of God, but your own personal,
man made doctrine. (:
G1074 - genea (ghen-eh-ah') is From a presumed derivative of G1085 Age.
My doctrine? Sorry That's your baby.=20
.
|
|
|
| User: "Giant Waffle" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
22 Oct 2006 04:23:23 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:41:58 GMT, while bungee jumping, Bod
<BoD@The-House-of-God.com> shouted thusly:
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 08:24 +0000, Giant Waffle wrote:
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:00:35 GMT, while bungee jumping, BoD
<BoD@the-house-of-god.com> shouted thusly:
This Age ! This Generation !
G1074 - genea (ghen-eh-ah') - From (a presumed derivative of)
G1085; a generation; by implication an age (the period or the persons):
- age, generation, nation, time.
Yes, the period or the persons, both of which note
a generation, in the same way that it is common to
use the word.
As Thayer's puts it... "the whole of a people living
at a given time".
Now why you think that Jesus went around trying to confuse
people (especially since we both know that you wouldn't
even try to argue the definition in any other verse), I have
no idea. (:
The problem is, you must use "generation" so as to fit your doctrinal
concept.
I don't play your game. It means what I said.
In fact, you wouldn't even argue this in the many
other verses in which the same word is used.
This shows that it's YOU who is guilty of this
crime.
However genea (ghen-eh-ah') - From G1085; "a generation by implication",
An Age.
The Greek word "aion" means "an age" and that is what
is used, when that is being expressed.
Nothing you say, will change the truth.
--
Giant Waffle
<{{{><
My heart rejoices in the Lord; My horn is exalted in the Lord.
I smile at my enemies, because I rejoice in Your salvation.
- 1 Samuel 2:1
.
|
|
|
| User: "Giant Waffle" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
22 Oct 2006 04:32:17 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:23:23 GMT, while bungee jumping, Giant
Waffle <_giantwaffle_@yahoo.com> shouted thusly:
P.S: (see below)
However genea (ghen-eh-ah') - From G1085; "a generation by implication",
An Age.
The Greek word "aion" means "an age" and that is what
is used, when that is being expressed.
See, for example, Mat 24:3 & Eph 2:7.
--
Giant Waffle
<{{{><
My heart rejoices in the Lord; My horn is exalted in the Lord.
I smile at my enemies, because I rejoice in Your salvation.
- 1 Samuel 2:1
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bod" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
22 Oct 2006 04:53:24 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 08:24 +0000, Giant Waffle wrote:=20
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:00:35 GMT, while bungee jumping, BoD
<BoD@the-house-of-god.com> shouted thusly:
=20
=20
This Age ! This Generation !
G1074 - genea (ghen-eh-ah') - From (a presumed derivative of)
G1085; a generation; by implication an age (the period or the persons):
- age, generation, nation, time.
=20
Yes, the period or the persons, both of which note
a generation, in the same way that it is common to
use the word.
=20
As Thayer's puts it... "the whole of a people living
at a given time".
Now why you think that Jesus went around trying to confuse
people (especially since we both know that you wouldn't
even try to argue the definition in any other verse), I have
no idea. (:
=20
The problem is, you must use "generation" so as to fit your doctrinal
concept.
However genea (ghen-eh-ah') - From G1085; "a generation by implication",
An Age.
Now if you take off your Thayer's head for a second. You might see
something.
=20
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrological_age
=20
Are you seriously going to try to get us to believe that
an English dictionary from the 21st century, is telling
us the definition of a Greek word, from an ancient,
dead language, called "Koine Greek" and that it really
means, "an astrological age" (seek link name)?
Yes I,am genea is more an "Age" than a "generation".
and here's for why.
MOSES is thought by many to have ushered in the Age of Aries.=20
+/- 2500 BC - 300 BC
The AGE of ARIES was the age of expanding Empires; Chinese, Persian,
Greek and then Roman. Each of these civilizations sought to always bring
more land and territory under their control. These Empires did so by
conquering the indigenous peoples of the lands as they expanded outward.
When Moses threw out the golden calf, he knew it was the end of the
Taurus Age or the fourth age in our present great Age. He instructed his
followers to get rid of the bull, put lambs' blood on the doors, and
place Rams' horns in the temples. By looking at the Master Calendar, the
Mazzaroth, or the Zodiac in the heavens, anyone could see that it was
the dawning of the Age of Aries the ram or lamb. It was the start of the
fifth age in the great Age
AGE OF PISCES
+/- 300 BC - 20?? AD=20
The Age of Pisces has been dominated largely by religion, Christianity
in particular, with its mixture of control by fear, persecution and
spiritual salvation.
The vernal point is the location of the sun in the sidereal zodiac on
the day of the spring equinox. Our present tropical calender and zodiac
places this as 1 degree Aries, when in fact, due to the precession,
every 72 years it is 1 degree backwards in the zodiac. As of February
10, 1983, the longitude of the vernal point was exactly 5 1/2 degrees
Pisces in the sidereal zodiac. For this reason, we live in the
ASTRONOMICAL AGE of Pisces.
The AGE of PISCES is related to WATER and the subconscious mind. All
human bodies are roughly 90% water, we each, must also take in new water
daily. These are two very important similarities between all Homo
Sapiens. "We" are all connected in several other ways too!
The AGE of PISCES was a period when "evil" or the "dark side" of the
Human Mind controlled civilization. FEAR has been humanity's primary
motivation to act, for over two thousands years.=20
Unreasonable FEAR showing its ugly head in the last decade or so.
That is why wise Ancient's hid as much valuable information as possible,
to preserve it. They knew society was going into long term decline and
much of the important stuff would be destroyed or misinterpreted,
intentionally and unintentionally.=20
The beginning of AGE of PISCES should be dated from the Birth of Buddha.
Buddha came from an angel. That was several hundred years before Jesus
Christ was born from a virgin. The AGE of PISCES is best characterized
by the above two guys, their spiritual philosophy's and Mohamed. 3 great
religions have come upon Earth during the AGE of PISCES, Buddhism,
Christianity and Islam.
Christianity has come to dominate the planet during the AGE of PISCES
because of it's inherent violence. Along with it's hypocrisy and GREED.
Christian's shouldn't be to worried about remaining in power because the
Moslems are following the examples set by the ruling Christians.
The WORLD has been at WAR since the beginning of the PISCES AGE. During
this period Many cruel things were done to human beings by their fellow
Humans. Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Radovan Karadzic,
genocide in AFRICA Spanish Inquisition and Bush have killed hundreds of
millions of people.
AGE OF AQUARIUS ENLIGHTENMENT AND PERSONAL FREEDOM
The precession of the equinoxes has to do with more than just the two
different zodiac systems. As the equinoxes precess, they relate to the
Great Ages of Man. These Ages mark different periods where significant
evolutionary changes have occurred. The Ages are defined by the Sidereal
Sign that is the current location of the Vernal Point.=20
Currently, the Spring Equinox (0=C2=B0 of Aries in the Tropical Zodiac)
occurs at about 7=C2=B0 of the Sidereal Sign of Pisces and we will be in th=
e
Sign of Pisces until the Spring Equinox processes into the Sidereal Sign
of Aquarius, which marks the beginning of the Age of Aquarius. (Even
agreeing on this definition of the "Ages" there is much dispute as to
the actual year that the "Age of Aquarius" begins/began.
When you intentionally try to change the primary definition
of the word from a Koine Greek dictionary (above), you told
us plainly that you knew that you were lying and that your
concern is not the word of God, but your own personal,
man made doctrine. (:
G1074 - genea (ghen-eh-ah') is From a presumed derivative of G1085 Age.
My doctrine? Sorry That's your baby.=20
.
|
|
|
| User: "Giant Waffle" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
22 Oct 2006 06:20:21 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:53:24 GMT, while bungee jumping, Bod
<BoD@The-House-of-God.com> shouted thusly:
MOSES is thought by many to have ushered in the Age of Aries.
+/- 2500 BC - 300 BC
I see. New Age garbage.
--
Giant Waffle
<{{{><
My heart rejoices in the Lord; My horn is exalted in the Lord.
I smile at my enemies, because I rejoice in Your salvation.
- 1 Samuel 2:1
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doug Webber" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
27 Oct 2006 12:28:58 AM |
|
|
I have been following this thread with some interest. Indeed, Jesus
did say that some in his day would live to see his second coming. But
as time moves in cycles, so does prophecy, so I see no problem in the
preterist interpretation. I think arguments start when people focus on
one interpretation of scripture, not realizing there are multiple
layers of interpretation as well as multiple fulfullments of prophecy.
As for the statement of Jesus that no sign will be given to this
generation except the sign of Jonah - Jonah was in the whale for three
days as Jesus was in a tomb for three days. But Jonah also prophesied
that in 40 days Ninevah would be destroyed - and likewise 40 years
after the crucifixion, Jerusalem was destroyed. As the body of Jesus
was the temple, which the Jews destroyed, so their temple was destroyed
in 70 A.D. Some experts state that the dismantling of the Jewish
temple would have taken extra time, and probably was completed in 71
A.D. - 40 years after the crucifixion (in Biblical prophecy a day can
equal a year).
Let's assume that a second coming did take place in 70 A.D. - a
spiritual one of sorts, not a physical one everyone expects. Josephus
reports that at the time of the siege of Jerusalem, interesting signs
were taking place in the sky. This would be the time that Jesus began
his reign in his heavenly kingdom - represented by the Christian Church
on earth, as the age of Judaism came to an end with the destruction of
the physical temple. Now lets jump to Revelation 20, where Satan gets
bound for a thousand years, after which Gog and Magog get unleashed.
Gog and Magog, and the associated nations, are also described in
Ezekiel 38-39, which many interpreters have identified with China,
Mongolia, and the Turks. So I just did some research on this: 1000
years after 71 A.D. takes us to 1071 A.D. What happened then? The
Battle of Manzikert, where the Seljuk Turks defeated the Byzantine
Empire. So critical was this battle that many people trace of the fall
of the Byzantine Empire to this battle. From there, the Seljuk Turks
easily conquer Jerusalem in 1076 A.D., leading to the period of
Crusades, and eventually the great Mongolian Empire of Ghengis Khan.
Obviously, not everything fits, both Ezekiel and Revelation state that
Gog and Magog get destroyed by fire from heaven. Obviously, still
future. Iraq has plenty of oil and China wont simply let America sit
on all that wealth. But these past events I think presage future ones.
One other thing of interest: Ezekiel's prophecy of Gog and Magog is
preceded by a prophecy that the tribes of Israel and Judah will be
reunited (Ezek. 37). For those of you who don't know, the 10 northern
tribes of Israel split from the 2 southern tribes of Judah after the
death of King Solomon, ca. 930 B.C. And guess what - from 930 B.C. to
71 A.D. is yet another 1000 year period. Since he reigned 40 years,
1000 years from the beginning of his reign leads us to the crucifixion
again.
I just thought of all this now, so feel free to poke holes in it.
There are some implied future dates from the pattern given above.
Flowerchild8245 wrote:
So you say Jesus was saying: "All these things shall come upon this
people generated by Israel"? Perhaps if you explore the many times
Jesus said "this generation", you will hear the Word of God reveal the
gospel truth, that when Jesus said "this generation", He was speaking
of His generation, an "evil", "faithless and twisted", "evil and
adulterous", "adulterous and sinful", and "faithless" generation.
(Luke 17:25) But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of
this generation.
Jesus suffered many things and was rejected by His generation! Jesus
said "this generation" many times in many different ways, not just
once. Here are some examples...Please Hear His words:
(Mat 11:16-19) But whereunto shall I liken this generation? It is like
unto children sitting in the markets, and calling unto their fellows,
And saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have
mourned unto you, and ye have not lamented. For John came neither
eating nor drinking, and they say, He hath a devil. The Son of man came
eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a
winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified
of her children.
Jesus said "what shall I liken this generation", saying John came and
He came, yet both were rejected. John came in the first century, Jesus
came in the first century, Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the generation of the first century.
(Mat 12:41) The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this
generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the
preaching of Jonah; and, behold, a greater than Jonah is here.
Jesus said "this generation" would be judged, because He was there
amongst them and they rejected Him. Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the same who repented not, the generation of the first
century.
(Mat 12:42) The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with
this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost
parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a
greater than Solomon is here.
Jesus said "this generation" would be judged, because He was there
amongst them and they rejected Him. Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the same who repented not, the generation of the first
century.
(Mar 8:12) And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, Why doth this
generation seek after a sign? verily I say unto you, There shall no
sign be given unto this generation.
Jesus said that the only sign His generation would see was simular to
the sign of Jonah, that as Jonah was in the belly of a whale three
days, after three days He would rise from the dead. The sign was given
to them in the first century, "this generation" was in the first
century...
(Luk 11:30) For as Jonah was a sign unto the Ninevites, so shall also
the Son of man be to this generation.
Again:
(Luk 11:50-51) That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from
the foundation of the world, may be required of [this generation]; From
the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between
the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required
of [this generation].
Jesus was scathing the Pharisees and said the blood of all the prophets
"shall be required of this generation", the same generation that
rejected Him, as Jesus reveals here...
(Luk 17:25) But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of
this generation.
Jesus was rejected by His generation, the generation of the first
century. When Jesus said "This generation" in this scripture, and more
than 10 times, He was speaking of His generation. That is the gospel
truth. Jesus spoke of His generation almost 25 times saying just
"generation" as well. Jesus even spoke of His generation in many
PARABLES too, often times, almost everytime, the parables were about
the Pharisees, and they knew it!
Plainly:
(Mat 23:36) TRULY, I SAY TO YOU, ALL THESE THINGS WILL COME UPON THIS
GENERATION.
(Mat 24:34) Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till
all these things be fulfilled.
(Mar 13:30) Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass,
till all these things be done.
(Luk 21:32) Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away,
till all be fulfilled.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatekeeper" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
27 Oct 2006 09:59:52 AM |
|
|
Doug Webber wrote:
I have been following this thread with some interest. Indeed, Jesus
did say that some in his day would live to see his second coming. But
as time moves in cycles, so does prophecy, so I see no problem in the
preterist interpretation. I think arguments start when people focus on
one interpretation of scripture, not realizing there are multiple
layers of interpretation as well as multiple fulfullments of prophecy.
As for the statement of Jesus that no sign will be given to this
generation except the sign of Jonah - Jonah was in the whale for three
days as Jesus was in a tomb for three days. But Jonah also prophesied
that in 40 days Ninevah would be destroyed - and likewise 40 years
after the crucifixion, Jerusalem was destroyed. As the body of Jesus
was the temple, which the Jews destroyed, so their temple was destroyed
in 70 A.D. Some experts state that the dismantling of the Jewish
temple would have taken extra time, and probably was completed in 71
A.D. - 40 years after the crucifixion (in Biblical prophecy a day can
equal a year).
Let's assume that a second coming did take place in 70 A.D. - a
spiritual one of sorts, not a physical one everyone expects. Josephus
reports that at the time of the siege of Jerusalem, interesting signs
were taking place in the sky. This would be the time that Jesus began
his reign in his heavenly kingdom - represented by the Christian Church
on earth, as the age of Judaism came to an end with the destruction of
the physical temple. Now lets jump to Revelation 20, where Satan gets
bound for a thousand years, after which Gog and Magog get unleashed.
Gog and Magog, and the associated nations, are also described in
Ezekiel 38-39, which many interpreters have identified with China,
Mongolia, and the Turks. So I just did some research on this: 1000
years after 71 A.D. takes us to 1071 A.D. What happened then? The
Battle of Manzikert, where the Seljuk Turks defeated the Byzantine
Empire. So critical was this battle that many people trace of the fall
of the Byzantine Empire to this battle. From there, the Seljuk Turks
easily conquer Jerusalem in 1076 A.D., leading to the period of
Crusades, and eventually the great Mongolian Empire of Ghengis Khan.
Obviously, not everything fits, both Ezekiel and Revelation state that
Gog and Magog get destroyed by fire from heaven. Obviously, still
future. Iraq has plenty of oil and China wont simply let America sit
on all that wealth. But these past events I think presage future ones.
One other thing of interest: Ezekiel's prophecy of Gog and Magog is
preceded by a prophecy that the tribes of Israel and Judah will be
reunited (Ezek. 37). For those of you who don't know, the 10 northern
tribes of Israel split from the 2 southern tribes of Judah after the
death of King Solomon, ca. 930 B.C. And guess what - from 930 B.C. to
71 A.D. is yet another 1000 year period. Since he reigned 40 years,
1000 years from the beginning of his reign leads us to the crucifixion
again.
I just thought of all this now, so feel free to poke holes in it.
There are some implied future dates from the pattern given above.
Flowerchild8245 wrote:
So you say Jesus was saying: "All these things shall come upon this
people generated by Israel"? Perhaps if you explore the many times
Jesus said "this generation", you will hear the Word of God reveal the
gospel truth, that when Jesus said "this generation", He was speaking
of His generation, an "evil", "faithless and twisted", "evil and
adulterous", "adulterous and sinful", and "faithless" generation.
(Luke 17:25) But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of
this generation.
Jesus suffered many things and was rejected by His generation! Jesus
said "this generation" many times in many different ways, not just
once. Here are some examples...Please Hear His words:
(Mat 11:16-19) But whereunto shall I liken this generation? It is like
unto children sitting in the markets, and calling unto their fellows,
And saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have
mourned unto you, and ye have not lamented. For John came neither
eating nor drinking, and they say, He hath a devil. The Son of man came
eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a
winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified
of her children.
Jesus said "what shall I liken this generation", saying John came and
He came, yet both were rejected. John came in the first century, Jesus
came in the first century, Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the generation of the first century.
(Mat 12:41) The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this
generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the
preaching of Jonah; and, behold, a greater than Jonah is here.
Jesus said "this generation" would be judged, because He was there
amongst them and they rejected Him. Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the same who repented not, the generation of the first
century.
(Mat 12:42) The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with
this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost
parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a
greater than Solomon is here.
Jesus said "this generation" would be judged, because He was there
amongst them and they rejected Him. Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the same who repented not, the generation of the first
century.
(Mar 8:12) And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, Why doth this
generation seek after a sign? verily I say unto you, There shall no
sign be given unto this generation.
Jesus said that the only sign His generation would see was simular to
the sign of Jonah, that as Jonah was in the belly of a whale three
days, after three days He would rise from the dead. The sign was given
to them in the first century, "this generation" was in the first
century...
(Luk 11:30) For as Jonah was a sign unto the Ninevites, so shall also
the Son of man be to this generation.
Again:
(Luk 11:50-51) That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from
the foundation of the world, may be required of [this generation]; From
the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between
the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required
of [this generation].
Jesus was scathing the Pharisees and said the blood of all the prophets
"shall be required of this generation", the same generation that
rejected Him, as Jesus reveals here...
(Luk 17:25) But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of
this generation.
Jesus was rejected by His generation, the generation of the first
century. When Jesus said "This generation" in this scripture, and more
than 10 times, He was speaking of His generation. That is the gospel
truth. Jesus spoke of His generation almost 25 times saying just
"generation" as well. Jesus even spoke of His generation in many
PARABLES too, often times, almost everytime, the parables were about
the Pharisees, and they knew it!
Plainly:
(Mat 23:36) TRULY, I SAY TO YOU, ALL THESE THINGS WILL COME UPON THIS
GENERATION.
(Mat 24:34) Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till
all these things be fulfilled.
(Mar 13:30) Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass,
till all these things be done.
(Luk 21:32) Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away,
till all be fulfilled.
Doug, basically as I have read your post, you are saying there was then
a present fulfilment, and then an expected secondary or future
fulfillment! This on the surface appears to be an acceptable spiritual
compromise but in actuallity, it is frought with errors, pitfalls,
snairs, and a host of dangerous and false teachings!
First I would like to say in trying to understand what you were saying,
and what was implied by what you were saying, please understand that
you are not alone in this interpretation and view of prophecy and
history! True Christianity, has always had the dilemna of maintaining
a Spiritual understanding of real time and and actual historical
events! Hence the struggle for example to understand from a prophetic
view point 70 AD. and the events that unfolded in Jerusalem with the
invasion of the Roman army that led to the sacking of Jerusalem, and
the destruction of the temple!
We understand that these events were prophesied in many places in the
Scriptures, by the prophets, and last by Jesus during His earthly
ministry! We maintain that specific events happened then, and
therefore are locked into the historical records. The faith of those
believers at that time, were directly and unquestionably affected by
those events. To say as some do that those events were not the
fulfillment of these particular prophecies, is to rob those early
believers of the significance of those events to their faith, as
recorded in history, and as understood by them as expressed in their
Faith.
So those of us who fight to maintain the significance of those events
to those Saints in the first century, do so realizing and believing
that those Saints were significant then, and in no way should be
diminished by us now, or for that matter any other Christians since
then! If we would allow their significance to be diminished back
then, then we would be setting the stage for any and all ensuing
generation of believers to be diminished as well!
Fact of the Matter, each ensuing generation, is built onto the Church,
the Body of Christ, and we would do ourselves a major disservice to
start removing previous building stones from the Church! All this
reminds me of the parlor game where there are a stack of small blocks,
and the point of the game is to start removing blocks until the stack
collapses. Even so many seem to be intent on removing certain blocks
from the Body of Christ, waiting for the collapse. The Scriptures say
that our Faith is built on the foundation of the Apostle and Prophets,
and upon the Faith of those who preceded us. We must therefore
maintain their testimony of the faithfulness of God, in fulfilling His
Word to them, and the resulting Faith that ensued, from the then
present tense fulfillment of the prophecy!
Secondly, to look for future fulfillments after there had been a
specific historical fulfillment, opens the door for all of the futurist
yearnings to peep and play, with various forms of fortune telling,
which has nothing to do with God and His purpose for prophecy in the
first place! Even so we see various schemes offered by many different
futurist, little of which builds up the Faith of the Body, and usually
just builds the reputation of those who maintain the particular scheme
with their particular and private interpretations, which ususally leads
to more and more speculation!
Now I understand that we humans, love to think that somehow whether
with tea leaves or crystal balls, or even some modern day version of
the Urim and Thummin, we can see beyond the veil into the Future. That
would give us a tremendous advantage over our cohorts, that do not have
that same advantage. Most importantly from a spiritual standpoint, we
could live our lives knowing when we would die, and what the events
surrounding that event would be like! This has been a major motivator
of most futurist throughout the history of mankind. But we play this
game of Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun pointed at our head!
We will all die, and that is the end of any futurist hope of scheme
fulfilled, at least in our life time, that would leave us ahead of any
that had come before us. Hopefully the faith of the futurist was
founded in Jesus, and not in his scheme, though that is not always
apparent or evident. Sadly I believe there have been those futurist
who had more faith in their scheme, than in Christ!
We can not escape into the future, for we are locked into time, and
responsible for how we account for the time that we have. Even so the
apostle said, "What manner of life should we live, considering all of
the things that should shortly come to pass!" We should not be
dreamers thinking about what we think will happen, usually a very long
distance off in the future! Instead the Word of God teaches us to
embrace the present with all of it's futility and frustrations, and
seek a spiritual expression and fulfillment of Faith where we are at in
the present! Which gets me back to where I started!
Futurist scheme have little or nothing to do with spiritual reality of
living in the present. Most schemes push off forever, any actual
fulfillment, because they are not interested in fulfillment. As soon
as there is fulfillment of a futurist scheme, then the futurist is out
of business! But our business as a Christian, is to build up the Body,
and the Faith of Believers in the present day Ascended and Glorified
Christ, who we rejoice in now and forever! He was the object of their
Faith 2000 years ago, and He is the object of our Faith now!
Now it is not that there are not prophetic utterances that are either
foretelling (different than fortune telling), or forth-telling! The
forth-telling would be recognized as the typical preaching, though not
usually recognized as prophecy, with the intent of exhortation and
encouragement of the Body of Christ! The foretelling has to do with
announcing the occurance of specific events that will occur in the
future! However it should be pointed out that even foretelling is
aimed at building the Faith of a specific and present tense expression
of the Body of Christ, and is also used to exhort and encourage that
particular expression of the Body of Christ! Prophesy is not just to
tintillate our spiritual curiosity about the future, but to drive us to
our knees in dependence on Jesus!
For example the Book of Revelation, is primarily a pastoral epistle,
aimed at building the Faith of the Believers in the Seven churches, as
addressed in the Book! The actual prophetic utterances, were to be
applied to their lives at that time to exhort them to endure, and to
comfort them when the enduring became difficult. Through all of these
events, they were to see Jesus unveiled, as the purpose of the
prophesy, not just the details of the fulfillment as an end in
themselves. Most futurist get so involved in studying the details of
the fulfillment, and understanding how to apply this to their current
time, that they overlook one small detail; the prophecy had been
previously fulfilled and the Faith of those earlier Christians had been
built up by that fulfillment.
Usually, the futurist is more than willing to deprive those early
Saints of their understanding of the events, since they are not here to
defend their Faith, for the prolonged future fulfilment, which the
futurist hope to see fulfilled themselves, and usually to their
benefit! This continually results in new understandings of the
Scriptures as the current crop of futurist tries to make an application
to their current situation, as long as they are on the winning side of
the future.
The futurist would not care whether it is 1071 AD. or 1492 AD. or 1948,
or 1998, '99, 2000, 2001, or 2006, or now 2011! Their game is to make
some application, that they thinks fits, and then promotes their
particular scheme! This resulted for example in the excesses of those
who had 98 reasons why the Lord was going to come back in '98, and
when that did not happen, they blew their horn of shofar again in '99,
and announced that they had missed one reason in their calculations!
Then the good futurist could not have missed something as significant a
9/11, so they poured over scipture until they can find some little jot
or tiddle that they could apply to understand the event of 9/11! Then
there is some new rumor of war like Iraq, and now Korea. Futurist end
up chasing current events, which in our modern media driven society,
the events come faster than they can manage, and come out with a
current publication of their prognostications! This all becomes rather
embarassing, and has nothing to do with Christ and the Love He has for
the Body, and the Body being built up in the most Holy Faith, once
delivered to the Saints.
Now I have written a long passage to you because though I do not know
your intentions at all, I find that what you suggest, is a dangerous
potion that if taken in the spirit of compromise, would poison the
faith of any believers that would subscribe to your position!
Faith is not a matter of compromise, but a matter of standing on the
revealed Word of God, and learning to make spiritual applications to
the Holy Spirit controlled life, in the current here and Now! The Life
we Live, we Live by Faith in Him, Who Loved us and gave Himself for us,
who are called by His Name, Jesus!
The Eastgate is open, the King is in residence! Whosoever will, may
come in!
Gatekeeper
.
|
|
|
| User: "H.E. Eickleberry, Jr." |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
27 Oct 2006 10:32:34 AM |
|
|
"gatekeeper" <gatekeeper.eastgate@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1161961191.926844.254820@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
[snip]
For example the Book of Revelation, is primarily a pastoral epistle,
aimed at building the Faith of the Believers in the Seven churches, as
addressed in the Book! The actual prophetic utterances, were to be
applied to their lives at that time to exhort them to endure, and to
comfort them when the enduring became difficult. Through all of these
events, they were to see Jesus unveiled, as the purpose of the
prophesy, not just the details of the fulfillment as an end in
themselves. Most futurist get so involved in studying the details of
the fulfillment, and understanding how to apply this to their current
time, that they overlook one small detail; the prophecy had been
previously fulfilled and the Faith of those earlier Christians had been
built up by that fulfillment.
Great.
ANOTHER false prophet of the preterist genre that doesn't know how to read
the Bible.
"That which has been is now, and that which is to be has already become,
and God requires that which is past." [Ecc. 3:15]
Ike
www.eickleberrybooks.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "gatekeeper" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
27 Oct 2006 12:56:47 PM |
|
|
H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. wrote:
"gatekeeper" <gatekeeper.eastgate@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1161961191.926844.254820@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
[snip]
For example the Book of Revelation, is primarily a pastoral epistle,
aimed at building the Faith of the Believers in the Seven churches, as
addressed in the Book! The actual prophetic utterances, were to be
applied to their lives at that time to exhort them to endure, and to
comfort them when the enduring became difficult. Through all of these
events, they were to see Jesus unveiled, as the purpose of the
prophesy, not just the details of the fulfillment as an end in
themselves. Most futurist get so involved in studying the details of
the fulfillment, and understanding how to apply this to their current
time, that they overlook one small detail; the prophecy had been
previously fulfilled and the Faith of those earlier Christians had been
built up by that fulfillment.
Great.
ANOTHER false prophet of the preterist genre that doesn't know how to read
the Bible.
"That which has been is now, and that which is to be has already become,
and God requires that which is past." [Ecc. 3:15]
Ike
www.eickleberrybooks.com
Ike, your post-mill futurist scheme is one of the more aggregeous forms
of futurism that I have seen here! That you use numbers and their
interpretation of some implied meaning to arrive at your interpretation
of past, current and future events, makes it impossible for any to
understand unless they have bought your book! This is an extreme
example of self promotion of you and your scheme. That you understand
and take offense at what I have said in the previous post, is no
surprise. Your poison is as deadly as any pre-mill futurist, and your
system of administering it is very effective. I have identified you as
post-mill, though I suspect you could be more of a post-trib, pre-mill
type, though it is not entirely clear, mainly because your scheme is
designed to be somewhat vague in any rigid claims regarding future
events! The difference is possibly insignificant to you, as long as you
sell books!
There seems to be something mystical and magical even to us in out day
and age, when the numbers all seem to add up. N;umbers can give a
mystical quality to events, but this form of spiritualizing is a poor
substitute for true walking in the Holy Spirit!
We love numbers, almost as much as just plain old fortune telling, so
if we can combine them, all the better! The best part of a number
system, is that it is very hard to argue with, when the interpretations
you come up with are not necessarily based on sound, or as the case,
unsound exegesis. You have succesfully insulated yourself with your
numbers. You are not responsible for what the numbers say!
If you just came out and said I believe thus and so because I believe
that this is what the Scriptures teach, would be one thing, even if you
were still of a post-mill persuasion! In my personal studying, I have
found certain understandable advocates of the persuasion, though I am
not personally persuaded. At least we have had a decent conversation,
and in the end I believe they still trully Love the Lord! In your
case, what I have seen is that you love your number system, with a
little Love for God thrown in to help the pill go down!
I have seen enough of your activity here to see you arguing about every
jot and tiddle of the scriptures, and I hope that this means that
somewhere in you could be found true faith, though this is not
necessarily the case. Even Satan, loves to argue scriptures, and in
other arenas, he is equally fond of number schemes for interpretating
events. So at best you are in bad company!
I have been praying for you, and have normally tried to avoid a direct
confrontation with you, expecting it to be less than beneficial! I
hope that you could reexamine the basis of your Faith, and put your
Faith simply back on Jesus, and the simple words of faith found in the
scriptures, that even a child can understand! Not some number system
that a child, nor anyone else without your special insight could
understand! If you choose to play your number games within your own
mind, I have no problem with that, since numbers, as music and art, etc
speak to individuals! But these things not bad in themselves, are no
substitute for Faith in Jesus, and His righteousness, and the Hope to
come, even the Blessed Hope of His appearing!
I would even challenge you to present what you believe about the
various prophecies, using scriptures only, and without reference to
your number scheme, and then I would be glad to reconsider your claims,
and your honesty in dealing with the scriptures! I would look forward
to this discussion, for if you are a man of Faith, my faith would be
sharpened, as iron sharpens iron, even though we would not necessarily
convince the other of our postition. Otherwise I have to consider your
reference to me as a false prophet as nothing more than the spiritual
blunder bust, of someone who got caught with their hand in the cookie
jar!
The Eastgate is open, the King is in residence! Whosoever will, may
come!
Gatekeeper
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred A Stover" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
28 Oct 2006 06:39:27 AM |
|
|
"goat-roper" <goat-roper.eastgate@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1161971807.714263.87460@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
H.E. Eickleberry, Jr. wrote:
"gatekeeper" <gatekeeper.eastgate@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1161961191.926844.254820@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
2 John 1:7
For many deceivers are entering into the world, who confess not that
Jesus Christ is coming in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Doug Webber" |
|
| Title: Re: The Revelation of Jesus Christ |
27 Oct 2006 06:52:30 PM |
|
|
gatekeeper wrote:
Doug Webber wrote:
I have been following this thread with some interest. Indeed, Jesus
did say that some in his day would live to see his second coming. But
as time moves in cycles, so does prophecy, so I see no problem in the
preterist interpretation. I think arguments start when people focus on
one interpretation of scripture, not realizing there are multiple
layers of interpretation as well as multiple fulfullments of prophecy.
As for the statement of Jesus that no sign will be given to this
generation except the sign of Jonah - Jonah was in the whale for three
days as Jesus was in a tomb for three days. But Jonah also prophesied
that in 40 days Ninevah would be destroyed - and likewise 40 years
after the crucifixion, Jerusalem was destroyed. As the body of Jesus
was the temple, which the Jews destroyed, so their temple was destroyed
in 70 A.D. Some experts state that the dismantling of the Jewish
temple would have taken extra time, and probably was completed in 71
A.D. - 40 years after the crucifixion (in Biblical prophecy a day can
equal a year).
Let's assume that a second coming did take place in 70 A.D. - a
spiritual one of sorts, not a physical one everyone expects. Josephus
reports that at the time of the siege of Jerusalem, interesting signs
were taking place in the sky. This would be the time that Jesus began
his reign in his heavenly kingdom - represented by the Christian Church
on earth, as the age of Judaism came to an end with the destruction of
the physical temple. Now lets jump to Revelation 20, where Satan gets
bound for a thousand years, after which Gog and Magog get unleashed.
Gog and Magog, and the associated nations, are also described in
Ezekiel 38-39, which many interpreters have identified with China,
Mongolia, and the Turks. So I just did some research on this: 1000
years after 71 A.D. takes us to 1071 A.D. What happened then? The
Battle of Manzikert, where the Seljuk Turks defeated the Byzantine
Empire. So critical was this battle that many people trace of the fall
of the Byzantine Empire to this battle. From there, the Seljuk Turks
easily conquer Jerusalem in 1076 A.D., leading to the period of
Crusades, and eventually the great Mongolian Empire of Ghengis Khan.
Obviously, not everything fits, both Ezekiel and Revelation state that
Gog and Magog get destroyed by fire from heaven. Obviously, still
future. Iraq has plenty of oil and China wont simply let America sit
on all that wealth. But these past events I think presage future ones.
One other thing of interest: Ezekiel's prophecy of Gog and Magog is
preceded by a prophecy that the tribes of Israel and Judah will be
reunited (Ezek. 37). For those of you who don't know, the 10 northern
tribes of Israel split from the 2 southern tribes of Judah after the
death of King Solomon, ca. 930 B.C. And guess what - from 930 B.C. to
71 A.D. is yet another 1000 year period. Since he reigned 40 years,
1000 years from the beginning of his reign leads us to the crucifixion
again.
I just thought of all this now, so feel free to poke holes in it.
There are some implied future dates from the pattern given above.
Flowerchild8245 wrote:
So you say Jesus was saying: "All these things shall come upon this
people generated by Israel"? Perhaps if you explore the many times
Jesus said "this generation", you will hear the Word of God reveal the
gospel truth, that when Jesus said "this generation", He was speaking
of His generation, an "evil", "faithless and twisted", "evil and
adulterous", "adulterous and sinful", and "faithless" generation.
(Luke 17:25) But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of
this generation.
Jesus suffered many things and was rejected by His generation! Jesus
said "this generation" many times in many different ways, not just
once. Here are some examples...Please Hear His words:
(Mat 11:16-19) But whereunto shall I liken this generation? It is like
unto children sitting in the markets, and calling unto their fellows,
And saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have
mourned unto you, and ye have not lamented. For John came neither
eating nor drinking, and they say, He hath a devil. The Son of man came
eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a
winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified
of her children.
Jesus said "what shall I liken this generation", saying John came and
He came, yet both were rejected. John came in the first century, Jesus
came in the first century, Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the generation of the first century.
(Mat 12:41) The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this
generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the
preaching of Jonah; and, behold, a greater than Jonah is here.
Jesus said "this generation" would be judged, because He was there
amongst them and they rejected Him. Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the same who repented not, the generation of the first
century.
(Mat 12:42) The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with
this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost
parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a
greater than Solomon is here.
Jesus said "this generation" would be judged, because He was there
amongst them and they rejected Him. Jesus was clearly speaking of His
generation, the same who repented not, the generation of the first
century.
(Mar 8:12) And he sighed deeply in his spirit, and saith, Why doth this
generation seek after a sign? verily I say unto you, There shall no
sign be given unto this generation.
Jesus said that the only sign His generation would see was simular to
the sign of Jonah, that as Jonah was in the belly of a whale three
days, after three days He would rise from the dead. The sign was given
to them in the first century, "this generation" was in the first
century...
(Luk 11:30) For as Jonah was a sign unto the Ninevites, so shall also
the Son of man be to this generation.
Again:
(Luk 11:50-51) That the blood of all the prophets, which was shed from
the foundation of the world, may be required of [this generation]; From
the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between
the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required
of [this generation].
Jesus was scathing the Pharisees and said the blood of all the prophets
"shall be required of this generation", the same generation that
rejected Him, as Jesus reveals here...
(Luk 17:25) But first must he suffer many things, and be rejected of
this generation.
Jesus was rejected by His generation, the generation of the first
century. When Jesus said "This generation" in this scripture, and more
than 10 times, He was speaking of His generation. That is the gospel
truth. Jesus spoke of His generation almost 25 times saying just
"generation" as well. Jesus even spoke of His generation in many
PARABLES too, often times, almost everytime, the parables were about
the Pharisees, and they knew it!
Plainly:
(Mat 23:36) TRULY, I SAY TO YOU, ALL THESE THINGS WILL COME UPON THIS
GENERATION.
(Mat 24:34) Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till
all these things be fulfilled.
(Mar 13:30) Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass,
till all these things be done.
(Luk 21:32) Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away,
till all be fulfilled.
God's Word, in its highest essence, is eternal. It is not tied down to
a specific time and place. Thus He describes Himself as the alpha and
omega, the beginning and the end - and his name Jehovah, the
self-existent one. But when it is revealed to us, it is adapted to our
understanding, and becomes tied down to a specific time and place. The
greatest revelation of God's Word took place in time with the birth,
death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. That will never change, and
the entire Bible is focused on that event.
When it comes to prophecy, there are past, present and future
fulfillments. And cycles, or world ages, will repeat. And prophecy is
often described in shadow, which is only revealed upon its fulfillment.
Thus the preterist, historical and futurist views are all correct.
However futurists tend to place everything in the future, in order to
deny historical fulfillments. The Roman Catholic Church tends to
prefer the futurist view, in order to hide from the masses what God's
Word says about such church.
Seen in this way, the Bible becomes more applicable to our everyday
lives. The destruction of the Jewish temple by the Romans was a
fulfillment of prophecy, and foreshadowed a future one - one that took
place over many centuries. That event is a prophecy of how the Roman
Catholic Church would invade the Apostolic Church and tear down the
Temple of Christ. For Christ is the true temple, not a building. It
was the Romans who crucified him, and divided up his garments. Thus we
have the statement "Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise
it up." Which statement has multiple meanings, not one.
As for predicting exact dates of the future, in the majority of cases I
agree, that is frought with error. Only God and his Word can reveal
it. As for the Book of Revelation, that is the hardest book of the
Bible to interpret, as it is highly symbolic. And literalism, which
most fundamentalists fall into, have a problem with symbolism,
metaphors, and parables.
Doug, basically as I have read your post, you are saying there was then
a present fulfilment, and then an expected secondary or future
fulfillment! This on the surface appears to be an acceptable spiritual
compromise but in actuallity, it is frought with errors, pitfalls,
snairs, and a host of dangerous and false teachings!
First I would like to say in trying to understand what you were saying,
and what was implied by what you were saying, please understand that
you are not alone in this interpretation and view of prophecy and
history! True Christianity, has always had the dilemna of maintaining
a Spiritual understanding of real time and and actual historical
events! Hence the struggle for example to understand from a prophetic
view point 70 AD. and the events that unfolded in Jerusalem with the
invasion of the Roman army that led to the sacking of Jerusalem, and
the destruction of the temple!
We understand that these events were prophesied in many places in the
Scriptures, by the prophets, and last by Jesus during His earthly
ministry! We maintain that specific events happened then, and
therefore are locked into the historical records. The faith of those
believers at that time, were directly and unquestionably affected by
those events. To say as some do that those events were not the
fulfillment of these particular prophecies, is to rob those early
believers of the significance of those events to their faith, as
recorded in history, and as understood by them as expressed in their
Faith.
So those of us who fight to maintain the significance of those events
to those Saints in the first century, do so realizing and believing
that those Saints were significant then, and in no way should be
diminished by us now, or for that matter any other Christians since
then! If we would allow their significance to be diminished back
then, then we would be setting the stage for any and all ensuing
generation of believers to be diminished as well!
Fact of the Matter, each ensuing generation, is built onto the Church,
the Body of Christ, and we would do ourselves a major disservice to
start removing previous building stones from the Church! All this
reminds me of the parlor game where there are a stack of small blocks,
and the point of the game is to start removing blocks until the stack
collapses. Even so many seem to be intent on removing certain blocks
from the Body of Christ, waiting for the collapse. The Scriptures say
that our Faith is built on the foundation of the Apostle and Prophets,
and upon the Faith of those who preceded us. We must therefore
maintain their testimony of the faithfulness of God, in fulfilling His
Word to them, and the resulting Faith that ensued, from the then
present tense fulfillment of the prophecy!
Secondly, to look for future fulfillments after there had been a
specific historical fulfillment, opens the door for all of the futurist
yearnings to peep and play, with various forms of fortune telling,
which has nothing to do with God and His purpose for prophecy in the
first place! Even so we see various schemes offered by many different
futurist, little of which builds up the Faith of the Body, and usually
just builds the reputation of those who maintain the particular scheme
with their particular and private interpretations, which ususally leads
to more and more speculation!
Now I understand that we humans, love to think that somehow whether
with tea leaves or crystal balls, or even some modern day version of
the Urim and Thummin, we can see beyond the veil into the Future. That
would give us a tremendous advantage over our cohorts, that do not have
that same advantage. Most importantly from a spiritual standpoint, we
could live our lives knowing when we would die, and what the events
surrounding that event would be like! This has been a major motivator
of most futurist throughout the history of mankind. But we play this
game of Russian roulette with a fully loaded gun pointed at our head!
We will all die, and that is the end of any futurist hope of scheme
fulfilled, at least in our life time, that would leave us ahead of any
that had come before us. Hopefully the faith of the futurist was
founded in Jesus, and not in his scheme, though that is not always
apparent or evident. Sadly I believe there have been those futurist
who had more faith in their scheme, than in Christ!
We can not escape into the future, for we are locked into time, and
responsible for how we account for the time that we have. Even so the
apostle said, "What manner of life should we live, considering all of
the things that should shortly come to pass!" We should not be
dreamers thinking about what we think will happen, usually a very long
distance off in the future! Instead the Word of God teaches us to
embrace the present with all of it's futility and frustrations, and
seek a spiritual expression and fulfillment of Faith where we are at in
the present! Which gets me back to where I started!
Futurist scheme have little or nothing to do with spiritual reality of
living in the present. Most schemes push off forever, any actual
fulfillment, because they are not interested in fulfillment. As soon
as there is fulfillment of a futurist scheme, then the futurist is out
of business! But our business as a Christian, is to build up the Body,
and the Faith of Believers in the present day Ascended and Glorified
Christ, who we rejoice in now and forever! He was the object of their
Faith 2000 years ago, and He is the object of our Faith now!
Now it is not that there are not prophetic utterances that are either
foretelling (different than fortune telling), or forth-telling! The
forth-telling would be recognized as the typical preaching, though not
usually recognized as prophecy, with the intent of exhortation and
encouragement of the Body of Christ! The foretelling has to do with
announcing the occurance of specific events that will occur in the
future! However it should be pointed out that even foretelling is
aimed at building the Faith of a specific and present tense expression
of the Body of Christ, and is also used to exhort and encourage that
particular expression of the Body of Christ! Prophesy is not just to
tintillate our spiritual curiosity about the future, but to drive us to
our knees in dependence on Jesus!
For example the Book of Revelation, is primarily a pastoral epistle,
aimed at building the Faith of the Believers in the Seven churches, as
addressed in the Book! The actual prophetic utterances, were to be
applied to their lives at that time to exhort them to endure, and to
comfort them when the enduring became difficult. Through all of these
events, they were to see Jesus unveiled, as the purpose of the
prophesy, not just the details of the fulfillment as an end in
themselves. Most futurist get so involved in studying the details of
the fulfillment, and understanding how to apply this to their current
time, that they overlook one small detail; the prophecy had been
previously fulfilled and the Faith of those earlier Christians had been
built up by that fulfillment.
Usually, the futurist is more than willing to deprive those early
Saints of their understanding of the events, since they are not here to
defend their Faith, for the prolonged future fulfilment, which the
futurist hope to see fulfilled themselves, and usually to their
benefit! This continually results in new understandings of the
Scriptures a | | | |