In article
<mccoy-1161907290.958524.230100@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,

Ye Old One wrote:

On 25 Oct 2006 12:50:21 -0700,

Ye Old One wrote:

On 25 Oct 2006 10:51:23 -0700,

Ye Old One wrote:

On 21 Oct 2006 19:43:17 -0700,

Ken Rode wrote:

Lee Oswald Ving wrote:

<snip>

"The myth was taken from the much earlier Vedic Utpanishads" is
the
claim that Desertphile made. I'd like him to document and prove
that.
Which writer of Genesis wrote that he borrowed from the earlier
Vedic
Utpanishads.

John, have you not considered how hypocritical it is to request
someone
else to provide evidence for something when you are unwilling to
provide evidence for anything yourself?

That's ridiculous and irrelevant. Desertphile claimed that "the
myth
was taken from the earlier Vedic Utpanishads" and since that is his
contention surely he would have some evidence for that.

And for almost anyone else I'm sure people would be running round
trying to help find evidence for you. But considering YOU past
posting
record, and the total disrespect you show people by not providing
evidence, why should anyone do anything for you McClueless?

Logic alert!!! Bob decides to focus on attacking me rather that
answering how the Bible takes from "earlier Vedic Utpanishads".

Moron alert!!!!!! McClueless can't get it through his thick skull that
HE needs to answer long outstanding questions before HE gets the right
to ask others questions.

Not so.

Yes - most certainly so.

I reiterate Logic Alert!!! Bob decides to focus on attacking
me rather than answering how the Bible takes from "earlier Vedic
Utpanishads". The fact is such a question has never been answered on
talk.origins and Bob knows that he cannot answer it so he is now
attempting to attack rather than answer.

Moron alert! Moron alert! Moron alert! Moron alert! Moron alert!

Is that an alert telling us about your arrival? That instead of
writing "Logic Alert" you want me to state "Moron alert!" Because your
focus on personal attack is a logic fallacy. All you need to do, Bob,
is tell us how the Bible takes from "earlier Vedic Utpanishads" and you
will have settled the issue. But instead you try to avoid the issue,
then when countered, cry out "moron alert." Why can't you answer the
qeustion? The answer is you can't.

JM

*
Many people do not know that, based on the latest findings, the name
of the Eden serpent was McCoy.

He slithers on his belly taking potshots at anyone who knows more
than he does, which includes damn near anybody.

McCoy is the one poster on this NewsGroup that abuses the privilege
of being stupid.

McCoy, we are all allowed to be downright dumb once in a while --
but don't abuse the privilege -- just try to say something truthful
and intelligent for a change. Here's an example:

1. Rainbows are multicolored.

See if you can come up with your own idea.

earle
*

On 26 Oct 2006 17:01:31 -0700,

Ye Old One wrote:

On 25 Oct 2006 12:50:21 -0700,

Ye Old One wrote:

On 25 Oct 2006 10:51:23 -0700,

Ye Old One wrote:

On 21 Oct 2006 19:43:17 -0700,

Ken Rode wrote:

Lee Oswald Ving wrote:

<snip>

"The myth was taken from the much earlier Vedic Utpanishads" is the
claim that Desertphile made. I'd like him to document and prove that.
Which writer of Genesis wrote that he borrowed from the earlier Vedic
Utpanishads.

John, have you not considered how hypocritical it is to request someone
else to provide evidence for something when you are unwilling to
provide evidence for anything yourself?

That's ridiculous and irrelevant. Desertphile claimed that "the myth
was taken from the earlier Vedic Utpanishads" and since that is his
contention surely he would have some evidence for that.

And for almost anyone else I'm sure people would be running round
trying to help find evidence for you. But considering YOU past posting
record, and the total disrespect you show people by not providing
evidence, why should anyone do anything for you McClueless?

Logic alert!!! Bob decides to focus on attacking me rather that
answering how the Bible takes from "earlier Vedic Utpanishads".

Moron alert!!!!!! McClueless can't get it through his thick skull that
HE needs to answer long outstanding questions before HE gets the right
to ask others questions.

Not so.

Yes - most certainly so.

I reiterate Logic Alert!!! Bob decides to focus on attacking
me rather than answering how the Bible takes from "earlier Vedic
Utpanishads". The fact is such a question has never been answered on
talk.origins and Bob knows that he cannot answer it so he is now
attempting to attack rather than answer.

Moron alert! Moron alert! Moron alert! Moron alert! Moron alert!

Is that an alert telling us about your arrival?

No, an alert that you are, as usual, being a moron.

That instead of
writing "Logic Alert" you want me to state "Moron alert!" Because your
focus on personal attack is a logic fallacy.

The failure in logic is, as usual, yours McClueless.

All you need to do, Bob,
is tell us how the Bible takes from "earlier Vedic Utpanishads" and you
will have settled the issue. But instead you try to avoid the issue,
then when countered, cry out "moron alert." Why can't you answer the
qeustion? The answer is you can't.

I have told you that YOU need to answer the question that has now been
outstanding for well over FOUR MONTHS McClueless. Until YOU learn to
answer a question you have no right to ask questions of others.

JM

McClueless can't get it through his thick skull that HE needs to
answer long outstanding questions before HE gets the right to ask
other people questions or to demand cites.

Tell you what McClueless. You come up with the cites regarding you lie
that "millions of textbooks" used Piltdown Man as important evidence
for evolution - and I'll not rest until I've either confirmed the
Vedic claim, or disproved it.

But you first McClueless, you have been running away from it for over
4 months now so it has to be you first.

JM

Oh, and McClueless, that is yet another abuse report you have earned.
You NSP must be getting fed up with you.

--
Bob.

Yet another abuse report.

--
Bob.