With a civil contract, they can get the benefits they want to have.
Leave marriage alone. Leave that for a man and a woman.
And I would also not support any churches as well who would perform

any

marriage ceremony for homosexuals.
That leaves another question.
For the states that do pass laws recognizing homosexual marraige.

What

do

they do about church pastors that refuse to marry homosexual couples?

Are

they going to sue them?

Don't be stupid. You obviously don't even know what's being asked for.

I do know.

So tell us, are you going to sue a pastor if he or she refuses to marry a
gay couple?

Why would I ask a church to go against dogma? Nobody's asking for
that, you idiot.

I asked you a question. Are you going to sue a pastor if he or she refuses
to marry a gay couple?

And why insult the churches?

You wouldn't be a bigot would you?

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:pkdm20preapek3agq10b5srbudq7dl87jq@4ax.com...

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:04:13 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Adam H." <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:v9bm20d43grfl2j3rj3dar373r240b836e@4ax.com...

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 02:13:00 -0500, "Osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:

"Thomas Trust" <ThomasTrust@newsworthy.com> wrote in message
news:rxFWb.288514$xy6.1442933@attbi_s02...

"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:40311882.6789605@netnews.mchsi.com...

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:21:11 GMT,
"Thomas Trust" wrote:

"Craig Chilton" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

[ ... ]

My response to this post is in its PROPER location, in the
ORIGINAL thread, having *this* subject header:

There is NO Valid Reason to Block Same-Sex Marriage.
NONE, whatsoever.

Repeating lies doesn't make them true.

And yet you just keep right on DOING that.

Of course, bigots are learning-impaired, or they could never
support such loathesome, hateful, and sociopathic agendas
as they do in the first place.

It is not at all wrong to stand up for the belief that homosexuality

is

morally, emotionally and functionally wrong. It is not at all wrong

to

stand up for the institution of marriage.

Oh, and you're the one always using the labels and names......

Have a nice day.

You are correct. There is nothing wrong with what you said at all.
Each and every one of us has issues we value. Some value abortion,

some

value gay rights, some value marriage.
We all are entitled to stand up for what we believe in. To try and

knock

someone down for simply doing that, they are basically participating
in censorship and wanting to take away that basic right of freedom of
speech.

Now Bobby proclaims that disagreeing with him on a newsgroup is
'censorship'.

Get off your cross, dumbass.

Nope. It's my cross and if I want to get on it..I will.

Some of these people are doing just that. They will try and shout you

down,

even resort to violence if you stand up against some issues..such as
homosexual marriage.

Examples, please.

Not relevent
(your excuse)

Ah, no examples. So, your claim of people resorting to violence is
just another made-up crock.

It wasn't relevent. Don't whine, that is your excuse when you are asked
questions.

I for one, do not support gay marriage, as most American's don't

either.

I don't care about a civil contract. The idea of marriage and what it
stands for is something I value and don't want to see degraded.

Your insecurity is showing. Your marriage must be in trouble.

It is?

Marraige is, in my opinion, a union between a man and a woman.

Your opinion is uninformed.

Hey, if you and your lover want to get a contract...go ahead. I don't

care.

Aww, Bobby's saying that I'm gay! How *cute*!

I guess that's supposed to be that thing I'm meant to be ashamed of,
right? Of course, you'll deny that you ever meant to imply that, won't
you?

Homosexual behavior is not normal, I don't care what anyone says. It

is

not

normal for a man to be with a man, or a woman to be with a woman.

Green eyes aren't normal.
Neither is being left-handed, or having an IQ above 130 (not that
you'll ever know anything about that last one).

yawn

About as intellectual a response as you ever give, that is.

Now naturally, many will say that it is normal and they will use

animals

as

a example.
Well some animals spread fecis to mark territory, or urinate on

objects

to

mark territory. So should we start doing that too because animals do

it?

To say homosexuality is normal and base it on the animal kingdom, is

taking

human down to the animal level.
Humans are above animals for several reasons, so there is no

comparison

with

sexual behavior.

Wrong.

Not wrong

Yes, indeed, you are.
There are many similarities. You seem terribly insecure about your
sexuality, Bobby.

Hey, if you want to compare yourself to a dog...by all means do so.
Hey, compare yourself to a hippo, they take their fecis and spray it all
over the place.
Maybe you can start doing that in your yard and say it is normal because
animals do it.

We know what is right and what is wrong. Homosexual behavior is

simply

not

a normal behavior. And with that, it will most likely remain a

behavior

that is unaccepted by most.

Green eyes aren't normal, and dogs also know when they've done
something wrong.

yawn

Boy, your arguments just can't stand up, can they?

They appear to be standing up just fine.

Well, seeing as you can't support them, no.

Well, seeing that when you are asked questions and you avoid them
You are the one who likes to hide things.

Most American's don't mind a civil contract agreement. It will

basically

shut the homosexuals up and we can all move on and get over having to

hear

about it on our TV's every night.

Ah, the irony. Bobby wants the homos to shut up. Seems you want to
censor them.

Nope, just tired of hearing about it all the time. You can go to your
little bars or parades and talk for all I care.

Gee, I bet that was meant to be a subtle yet cutting innuendo, wasn't
it?

Keep trying, Bobby.

With a civil contract, they can get the benefits they want to have.
Leave marriage alone. Leave that for a man and a woman.
And I would also not support any churches as well who would perform

any

marriage ceremony for homosexuals.
That leaves another question.
For the states that do pass laws recognizing homosexual marraige.

What

do

they do about church pastors that refuse to marry homosexual couples?

Are

they going to sue them?

Don't be stupid. You obviously don't even know what's being asked for.

I do know.

So tell us, are you going to sue a pastor if he or she refuses to marry a
gay couple?

Why would I ask a church to go against dogma? Nobody's asking for
that, you idiot.

I asked you a question. Are you going to sue a pastor if he or she refuses
to marry a gay couple?
And why insult the churches?
You wouldn't be a bigot would you?