| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"jabriol" |
| Date: |
02 Sep 2003 01:29:48 PM |
| Object: |
TOBS-Genesis: Creative day II |
All,
{another thread that really belongs to Talk.Origins,
but due the ongoing content moderation...well, I just
have to make due.. I wish to express my gratitude to
SAP moderator for allowing me to post from SAP as me
knew home group, at least until the T.O content
moderation ban is lifted}
That being, said let continue we read:
“‘Let an expanse come to be in between the waters and
let a dividing occur between the waters and the
waters.’ Then God proceeded to make the expanse and to
make a division between the waters that should be
beneath the expanse and the waters that should be
above the expanse. And it came to be so. And God began
to call the expanse Heaven.”—Genesis 1:6-8.
Some translations use the word “firmament” instead of
“expanse.” From this the argument is made that the
Genesis account borrowed from creation myths that
represent this “firmament” as a metal dome. But even
the King James Version Bible, which uses “firmament,”
says in the margin, “expansion.” This is because the
Hebrew word ra·qi´a', translated “expanse,” means to
stretch out or spread out or expand.
The Genesis account says that God did it, but it does
not say how. In whatever way the described separation
occurred, it would look as though the ‘waters above’
had been pushed up from the earth. And birds could
later be said to fly in “the expanse of the heavens,”
as stated at Genesis 1:20.*
Now then, for the global flood it took 40 days of
constant rain. So seperating the expanse, is much more
than rainfall n'est pas?
It not an assumption of limiting God power to
acomplsih things, but if he created our universe, with
it unmutable physical laws, more likely he will abide
by them, which make an observer wonder, why we can not
see a supra natural event or have evidence of such for
determining creation by an intelligent being yet
creation by luck and chance as stipulated in the
theory of evolution, is accepted not based on evidence
but faith :-)
*ref upon req.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
.
|
|
| User: "Lane Lewis" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day II |
05 Sep 2003 03:08:03 PM |
|
|
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:20030902182948.17810.qmail@web10805.mail.yahoo.com...
All,
{another thread that really belongs to Talk.Origins,
but due the ongoing content moderation...well, I just
have to make due.. I wish to express my gratitude to
SAP moderator for allowing me to post from SAP as me
knew home group, at least until the T.O content
moderation ban is lifted}
That being, said let continue we read:
That being lied about is more like it.
There is not any content moderation in T.O short of;
Spam is not allowed
Flooding is not allowed
Harmful Scripts or links to harmful scripts are not allowed
It is a text only newsgroup.
And these are the rules of Usenet and every ISP I know of.
T.O does restrict your right to crosspost however which is not "content
moderation" by any use of the term.
When you start your post with an out and out lie I don't know why anyone
should take you seriously.
The Official Usenet FAQ
http://www.faqs.org/usenet/
Lane
.
|
|
|
| User: "jabriol" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day II |
05 Sep 2003 06:18:37 PM |
|
|
"Lane Lewis" <lanejlewis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:D266b.7825$y_6.461017@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:20030902182948.17810.qmail@web10805.mail.yahoo.com...
All,
{another thread that really belongs to Talk.Origins,
but due the ongoing content moderation...well, I just
have to make due.. I wish to express my gratitude to
SAP moderator for allowing me to post from SAP as me
knew home group, at least until the T.O content
moderation ban is lifted}
That being, said let continue we read:
That being lied about is more like it.
There is not any content moderation in T.O short of;
I guess you missed the thread on News.Groups, where it was confirmed that
content moderation was indeed being practice, and it was the moderators
right to do as he pleased against the charter...
Spam is not allowed
Flooding is not allowed
Harmful Scripts or links to harmful scripts are not allowed
It is a text only newsgroup.
And these are the rules of Usenet and every ISP I know of.
then ask Grieg about the ban on support groups
and the quiet banning on poster.. which grieg has admitted to do in the
past.
T.O does restrict your right to crosspost however which is not "content
moderation" by any use of the term.
not according to the useless lords of News.groups...
When you start your post with an out and out lie I don't know why
anyone
should take you seriously.
it not a lie.. and people do take me seriously..
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cactus" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day II |
05 Sep 2003 06:45:00 PM |
|
|
Some of your arguments would be much more meaningful if you used the
original Hebrew rather than translations. You'll have lots of interpretive
sources and you won't have to quibble of words so much.
"jabriol" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:20030902182948.17810.qmail@web10805.mail.yahoo.com...
All,
{another thread that really belongs to Talk.Origins,
but due the ongoing content moderation...well, I just
have to make due.. I wish to express my gratitude to
SAP moderator for allowing me to post from SAP as me
knew home group, at least until the T.O content
moderation ban is lifted}
That being, said let continue we read:
"'Let an expanse come to be in between the waters and
let a dividing occur between the waters and the
waters.' Then God proceeded to make the expanse and to
make a division between the waters that should be
beneath the expanse and the waters that should be
above the expanse. And it came to be so. And God began
to call the expanse Heaven."-Genesis 1:6-8.
Some translations use the word "firmament" instead of
"expanse." From this the argument is made that the
Genesis account borrowed from creation myths that
represent this "firmament" as a metal dome. But even
the King James Version Bible, which uses "firmament,"
says in the margin, "expansion." This is because the
Hebrew word ra·qi´a', translated "expanse," means to
stretch out or spread out or expand.
The Genesis account says that God did it, but it does
not say how. In whatever way the described separation
occurred, it would look as though the 'waters above'
had been pushed up from the earth. And birds could
later be said to fly in "the expanse of the heavens,"
as stated at Genesis 1:20.*
Now then, for the global flood it took 40 days of
constant rain. So seperating the expanse, is much more
than rainfall n'est pas?
It not an assumption of limiting God power to
acomplsih things, but if he created our universe, with
it unmutable physical laws, more likely he will abide
by them, which make an observer wonder, why we can not
see a supra natural event or have evidence of such for
determining creation by an intelligent being yet
creation by luck and chance as stipulated in the
theory of evolution, is accepted not based on evidence
but faith :-)
*ref upon req.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day II -- BIBLICAL COSMOLOGY |
02 Sep 2003 07:43:58 PM |
|
|
jabriol wrote:
All,
{another thread that really belongs to Talk.Origins,
but due the ongoing content moderation...well, I just
have to make due.. I wish to express my gratitude to
SAP moderator for allowing me to post from SAP as me
knew home group, at least until the T.O content
moderation ban is lifted}
That being, said let continue we read:
“‘Let an expanse come to be in between the waters and
let a dividing occur between the waters and the
waters.’ Then God proceeded to make the expanse and to
make a division between the waters that should be
beneath the expanse and the waters that should be
above the expanse. And it came to be so. And God began
to call the expanse Heaven.”—Genesis 1:6-8.
Some translations use the word “firmament” instead of
“expanse.” From this the argument is made that the
Genesis account borrowed from creation myths that
represent this “firmament” as a metal dome. But even
the King James Version Bible, which uses “firmament,”
says in the margin, “expansion.” This is because the
Hebrew word ra·qi´a', translated “expanse,” means to
stretch out or spread out or expand.
===>That is an attempt to get away from the truth.
In fact the description fits perfectly with the verse from
Job: 'Clouds are a hiding place for Him, so that He cannot see;
And He walks on the vault of heaven.' Job 22:14
One can just imagine YHWH's footsteps thundering through
the "vault of heaven".
ALSO SEE: Amos 9:6
"The One who builds His upper chambers in the heavens
And has founded His vaulted dome over the earth"
So, indeed, the cosmology describes a VAULT/VAULTED DOME
i.e. a FIRMAMENT, to which the tiny lights (stars) are affixed,
and which is the "storehouse" of the "waters above".
The dome has openings ("windows") through which YHWH lets down
some water occasionally, or lots of water when he wants to drown
all living creatures.
Genesis 7:11-12
....the windows of heaven were opened.
And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.
Genesis 8:2
....the windows of heaven were stopped,
and the rain from heaven was restrained;
Deuteronomy 28:12
"The LORD will open for you His good storehouse,
the heavens, to give rain to your land."
So, how can you deny the Bible's writers did not have that
cosmology in mind?
Libertarius
============
.
|
|
|
| User: "ResLight" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day II -- BIBLICAL COSMOLOGY |
05 Sep 2003 01:42:53 PM |
|
|
I have removed alt.atheism from the crossposts in response. Any wishing to
see my responses, please visit one of the other newsgroups.
Ronald
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ResLight" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day II -- BIBLICAL COSMOLOGY |
05 Sep 2003 01:40:01 PM |
|
|
I have removed alt.atheism in the crossposts.
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F55394E.AADFB724@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
jabriol wrote:
All,
{another thread that really belongs to Talk.Origins,
but due the ongoing content moderation...well, I just
have to make due.. I wish to express my gratitude to
SAP moderator for allowing me to post from SAP as me
knew home group, at least until the T.O content
moderation ban is lifted}
That being, said let continue we read:
"'Let an expanse come to be in between the waters and
let a dividing occur between the waters and the
waters.' Then God proceeded to make the expanse and to
make a division between the waters that should be
beneath the expanse and the waters that should be
above the expanse. And it came to be so. And God began
to call the expanse Heaven."-Genesis 1:6-8.
Some translations use the word "firmament" instead of
"expanse." From this the argument is made that the
Genesis account borrowed from creation myths that
represent this "firmament" as a metal dome. But even
the King James Version Bible, which uses "firmament,"
says in the margin, "expansion." This is because the
Hebrew word ra·qi´a', translated "expanse," means to
stretch out or spread out or expand.
===>That is an attempt to get away from the truth.
In fact the description fits perfectly with the verse from
Job: 'Clouds are a hiding place for Him, so that He cannot see;
And He walks on the vault of heaven.' Job 22:14
I am not totally sure what the purpose of the quotation of these scriptures
are supposed to mean as related to Jabriol's presentation, with which I am
in basic agreement. But I will give some comments regarding these
scriptures.
You say, 'What does God know? Can he judge through the thick darkness? Thick
clouds are a covering to him, so that he doesn't see. He walks on the vault
of the sky.'
This is Eliphaz replying to Job. Eliphaz, of course, was one of Job's false
comforters, who was falsing accusing Job of hiding from God, claiming that
Job was saying that God cannot see through the clouds, etc. I see no
relation, however, to what Jabriol posted concerning the second creative
day.
Eliphaz would have it thought that Job was an Epicurean, who did indeed
believe in the existence of God, but denied his providence, and fancied that
he confined himself to the entertainments of the upper world and never
concerned himself in the inhabitants and affairs of this. However, even
Eliphaz did not believe this to be true, as can be seen by the rest of his
statements; thus this was but his false accusation toward Job, that Job was
committing such a grave sin by treating God as such.
Job's reply to Eliphaz was: "Oh that I knew where I might find him! That I
might come even to his seat!" (Job 23:3) And: "But he knows the way that I
take. When he has tried me, I shall come forth like gold." (Job 23:10)
However, the word translated "vault" is Strong's #2329, which simply means
circuit or circle.
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=02329
As such it simply seems to refer to the upper atmosphere of the earth.
Eliphaz' usage of this word, however, was to present a false idea of God,
which false idea he attributed to Job. Man, of course, is not hidden from
God behind some "vault" or covering.
One can just imagine YHWH's footsteps thundering through
the "vault of heaven".
ALSO SEE: Amos 9:6
"The One who builds His upper chambers in the heavens
And has founded His vaulted dome over the earth"
It is he who builds his chambers in the heavens, and has founded his vault
on the earth; he who calls for the waters of the sea, and pours them out on
the surface of the earth; Yahweh is his name. -- World English Bible
translation.
The word translated "vault" is Strong's Hebrew #92, transliterated
"'aguddah"
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=092&version=kjv
It is one of those Hebrew words that carries various degrees of meaning, and
thus is often translated by different translators differently, depending
upon with variation of meaning they believe applies. The book of Amos is
highly figuratively, and we should look upon it in this manner. The prophecy
is not about literal "fire" (Amos 1:4,7,10,14; 2:2), a literal "bar" (Amos
1:5); literal "wine" (Amos 2:12), etc., nor should the statment concerning
God's building "chambers" and "vault" be taken literally.
If the expression "vaulted dome" should be used, as in the NAS, then it is
simply figurative of the bounded limits that is set upon the earth, or, it
could be referring metaphorically to the bondage of corruption -- the sinful
nature -- that God has put upon his human creation on earth. (Romans
1:26,28; 7:14; 8:3,15,21; Galatians 4:3; Hebrews 2:15) Or, "'aguddah" could
be translated either "binding" or "bands", relating to the limits of man on
the earth, or "troop" or "bundle", simply relating to the band or bundle of
sentient creatures on the earth.
So, indeed, the cosmology describes a VAULT/VAULTED DOME
i.e. a FIRMAMENT, to which the tiny lights (stars) are affixed,
and which is the "storehouse" of the "waters above".
Genesis 1:14 God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of sky to divide
the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for
days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the expanse of sky to give
light on the earth," and it was so. 16 God made the two great lights: the
greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He
also made the stars. 17 God set them in the expanse of sky to give light to
the earth, 18 and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the
light from the darkness. God saw that it was good. 19 There was evening and
there was morning, a fourth day.
Of course, as I have stated in another thread, the "stars", and even "sun"
or "moon" referred to in the Bible do not necessarily correspond with modern
science's usage of the words star, sun and moon, and seldom does it actually
refer to the body of mass/energy itself, but rather simply to the light as
seen in the sky. The Bible was not written for the purpose of demonstrating
modern scientific terminoloy nor satisfying scientific curiosity, and
matters are not stated as perhaps most scientists would like to have them
stated.
Genesis 1:8 -- God called the expanse sky. There was evening and there was
morning, a second day. -- World English Bible
The Bible says that God called the "firmament" -- the expanse -- "sky". The
expanse is the sky -- the atmosphere above us. It is in this sky -- as one
looks from the surface of the earth -- that the luminaries of the sun, moon,
and stars are seen. Thus in the fourth creative day, we could reason that
either the vaporous clouds above the firmament expanded enough so that the
sun, moon and stars could be seen in the expanse below the waters above. Or
we could reason that, if there was some other obstruction outside the
vaporous clouds above the firmament, that it was somehow removed so that the
sun, moon and stars could be seen in the expanse below the "waters above."
The dome has openings ("windows") through which YHWH lets down
some water occasionally, or lots of water when he wants to drown
all living creatures.
Genesis 7:11-12
...the windows of heaven were opened.
In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the
seventeenth day of the month, on the same day all the fountains of the great
deep were burst open, and the sky's windows [sluice] were opened. The rain
was on the earth forty days and forty nights. -- Genesis 7:11,12, World
English Bible
In the six hundredth year of the life of Noah, in the second month, in the
seventeenth day of the month, in this day have been broken up all fountains
of the great deep, and the net-work of the heavens hath been opened, and the
shower is on the earth forty days and forty nights. -- Young's Literal
Translation
When Noah was 600 years old, on the seventeenth day of the second month, the
underground waters burst forth on the earth, and the rain fell in mighty
torrents from the sky. The rain continued to fall for forty days and forty
nights. -- New Living Translation
Of course, in Genesis God did open the "sluice" (Strong's #699*) of the
skys, the clouded circle, or canopy, that circled the earth. I do not see
this opening of "windows" -- the sluice -- as supposed openings in a
supposed dome through which God caused it to rain, but rather as the opening
of "a body of water pent up behind a floodgate." (Merriam-Webster
Dictionary**, under "sluice".) This would be the "waters above" that is
spoken of in the creative account.
==========
* http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=0699
** http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
Agape love,
Ronald
http://reslight.addr.com/l-evolution.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Libertarius" |
|
| Title: Re: TOBS-Genesis: Creative day II -- BIBLICAL COSMOLOGY |
05 Sep 2003 05:32:10 PM |
|
|
--------------3DA93B774E584C7D8B850556
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
ResLight wrote:
I have removed alt.atheism in the crossposts.
"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
news:3F55394E.AADFB724@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net...
jabriol wrote:
All,
{another thread that really belongs to Talk.Origins,
but due the ongoing content moderation...well, I just
have to make due.. I wish to express my gratitude to
SAP moderator for allowing me to post from SAP as me
knew home group, at least until the T.O content
moderation ban is lifted}
That being, said let continue we read:
"'Let an expanse come to be in between the waters and
let a dividing occur between the waters and the
waters.' Then God proceeded to make the expanse and to
make a division between the waters that should be
beneath the expanse and the waters that should be
above the expanse. And it came to be so. And God began
to call the expanse Heaven."-Genesis 1:6-8.
Some translations use the word "firmament" instead of
"expanse." From this the argument is made that the
Genesis account borrowed from creation myths that
represent this "firmament" as a metal dome. But even
the King James Version Bible, which uses "firmament,"
says in the margin, "expansion." This is because the
Hebrew word ra·qi´a', translated "expanse," means to
stretch out or spread out or expand.
===>That is an attempt to get away from the truth.
In fact the description fits perfectly with the verse from
Job: 'Clouds are a hiding place for Him, so that He cannot see;
And He walks on the vault of heaven.' Job 22:14
I am not totally sure what the purpose of the quotation of these scriptures
are supposed to mean as related to Jabriol's presentation, with which I am
in basic agreement.
===>They support the conclusion about what sort of cosmology
the authors compiled in the Bible had in mind.
But I will give some comments regarding these
scriptures.
You say, 'What does God know? Can he judge through the thick darkness? Thick
clouds are a covering to him, so that he doesn't see. He walks on the vault
of the sky.'
This is Eliphaz replying to Job. Eliphaz, of course, was one of Job's false
comforters, who was falsing accusing Job of hiding from God, claiming that
Job was saying that God cannot see through the clouds, etc. I see no
relation, however, to what Jabriol posted concerning the second creative
day.
===>It shows what the authors of the Bible believed about the
"vault of the sky".
And, of course, your snide reference to Eliphaz is irrelevant.
As I also quoted -- see below -- other verses also
support that same cosmology.
Eliphaz would have it thought that Job was an Epicurean, who did indeed
believe in the existence of God, but denied his providence, and fancied that
he confined himself to the entertainments of the upper world and never
concerned himself in the inhabitants and affairs of this. However, even
Eliphaz did not believe this to be true, as can be seen by the rest of his
statements; thus this was but his false accusation toward Job, that Job was
committing such a grave sin by treating God as such.
Job's reply to Eliphaz was: "Oh that I knew where I might find him! That I
might come even to his seat!" (Job 23:3) And: "But he knows the way that I
take. When he has tried me, I shall come forth like gold." (Job 23:10)
However, the word translated "vault" is Strong's #2329, which simply means
circuit or circle.
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=02329
As such it simply seems to refer to the upper atmosphere of the earth.
Eliphaz' usage of this word, however, was to present a false idea of God,
which false idea he attributed to Job. Man, of course, is not hidden from
God behind some "vault" or covering.
One can just imagine YHWH's footsteps thundering through
the "vault of heaven".
ALSO SEE: Amos 9:6
"The One who builds His upper chambers in the heavens
And has founded His vaulted dome over the earth"
It is he who builds his chambers in the heavens, and has founded his vault
on the earth; he who calls for the waters of the sea, and pours them out on
the surface of the earth; Yahweh is his name. -- World English Bible
translation.
The word translated "vault" is Strong's Hebrew #92, transliterated
"'aguddah"
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=092&version=kjv
It is one of those Hebrew words that carries various degrees of meaning, and
thus is often translated by different translators differently, depending
upon with variation of meaning they believe applies. The book of Amos is
highly figuratively, and we should look upon it in this manner. The prophecy
is not about literal "fire" (Amos 1:4,7,10,14; 2:2), a literal "bar" (Amos
1:5); literal "wine" (Amos 2:12), etc., nor should the statment concerning
God's building "chambers" and "vault" be taken literally.
===>WHAT A DODGE!
If the expression "vaulted dome" should be used, as in the NAS, then it is
simply figurative of the bounded limits that is set upon the earth, or, it
could be referring metaphorically to the bondage of corruption -- the sinful
nature -- that God has put upon his human creation on earth. (Romans
1:26,28; 7:14; 8:3,15,21; Galatians 4:3; Hebrews 2:15) Or, "'aguddah" could
be translated either "binding" or "bands", relating to the limits of man on
the earth, or "troop" or "bundle", simply relating to the band or bundle of
sentient creatures on the earth.
===>NONSENSE!
It is a cosmological statement which you are trying to explain away!
So, indeed, the cosmology describes a VAULT/VAULTED DOME
i.e. a FIRMAMENT, to which the tiny lights (stars) are affixed,
and which is the "storehouse" of the "waters above".
Genesis 1:14 God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of sky to divide
the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for
days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the expanse of sky to give
light on the earth," and it was so. 16 God made the two great lights: the
greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night. He
also made the stars. 17 God set them in the expanse of sky to give light to
the earth, 18 and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the
light from the darkness. God saw that it was good. 19 There was evening and
there was morning, a fourth day.
Of course, as I have stated in another thread, the "stars", and even "sun"
or "moon" referred to in the Bible do not necessarily correspond with modern
science's usage of the words star, sun and moon, and seldom does it actually
refer to the body of mass/energy itself, but rather simply to the light as
seen in the sky.
===>Of course.
That is ALL the authors knew about!
Their cosmology reflects what was seen by the naked eye.
It proves the Bible is the WORD OF MEN.
The Bible was not written for the purpose of demonstrating
modern scientific terminoloy nor satisfying scientific curiosity, and
matters are not stated as perhaps most scientists would like to have them
stated.
===>Because the men who wrote it knew nothing of that sort.
Had there been a "God" telling those stories, one would think
such a being would have known better.
Genesis 1:8 -- God called the expanse sky. There was evening and there was
morning, a second day. -- World English Bible
The Bible says that God called the "firmament" -- the expanse -- "sky". The
expanse is the sky -- the atmosphere above us. It is in this sky -- as one
looks from the surface of the earth -- that the luminaries of the sun, moon,
and stars are seen. Thus in the fourth creative day, we could reason that
either the vaporous clouds above the firmament expanded enough so that the
sun, moon and stars could be seen in the expanse below the waters above. Or
we could reason that, if there was some other obstruction outside the
vaporous clouds above the firmament, that it was somehow removed so that the
sun, moon and stars could be seen in the expanse below the "waters above."
===>You cannot "reason". Only apologetically SPECULATE
how you might try to explain what is perfectly clear and not in need of
any explanation.
The dome has openings ("windows") through which YHWH lets down
some water occasionally, or lots of water when he wants to drown
all living creatures.
Genesis 7:11-12
...the windows of heaven were opened.
In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the
seventeenth day of the month, on the same day all the fountains of the great
deep were burst open, and the sky's windows [sluice] were opened. The rain
was on the earth forty days and forty nights. -- Genesis 7:11,12, World
English Bible
In the six hundredth year of the life of Noah, in the second month, in the
seventeenth day of the month, in this day have been broken up all fountains
of the great deep, and the net-work of the heavens hath been opened, and the
shower is on the earth forty days and forty nights. -- Young's Literal
Translation
When Noah was 600 years old, on the seventeenth day of the second month, the
underground waters burst forth on the earth, and the rain fell in mighty
torrents from the sky. The rain continued to fall for forty days and forty
nights. -- New Living Translation
Of course, in Genesis God did open the "sluice" (Strong's #699*) of the
skys, the clouded circle, or canopy, that circled the earth. I do not see
this opening of "windows" -- the sluice -- as supposed openings in a
supposed dome through which God caused it to rain, but rather as the opening
of "a body of water pent up behind a floodgate." (Merriam-Webster
Dictionary**, under "sluice".) This would be the "waters above" that is
spoken of in the creative account.
===>Sluice or window or floodgate -- all the same thing.
Nothing of that sort exists in reality, only in the imagination of
the authors of the Bible.
You cannot get away from the FACT that the Bible uses
a primitive cosmology that was common to the Near-Eastern
peoples of its time.
Libertarius
============
==========
* http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=0699
** http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
Agape love,
Ronald
http://reslight.addr.com/l-evolution.html
--------------3DA93B774E584C7D8B850556
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<p>ResLight wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I have removed alt.atheism in the crossposts.
<p>"Libertarius" <Libertarius@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net> wrote in message
<br><a href="news:3F55394E.AADFB724@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net">news:3F55394E.AADFB724@Nothing_But_The_Truth.net</a>...
<br>>
<br>>
<br>> jabriol wrote:
<br>>
<br>> > All,
<br>> >
<br>> > {another thread that really belongs to Talk.Origins,
<br>> > but due the ongoing content moderation...well, I just
<br>> > have to make due.. I wish to express my gratitude to
<br>> > SAP moderator for allowing me to post from SAP as me
<br>> > knew home group, at least until the T.O content
<br>> > moderation ban is lifted}
<br>> >
<br>> > That being, said let continue we read:
<br>> >
<br>> > "'Let an expanse come to be in between the waters and
<br>> > let a dividing occur between the waters and the
<br>> > waters.' Then God proceeded to make the expanse and to
<br>> > make a division between the waters that should be
<br>> > beneath the expanse and the waters that should be
<br>> > above the expanse. And it came to be so. And God began
<br>> > to call the expanse Heaven."-Genesis 1:6-8.
<br>> >
<br>> > Some translations use the word "firmament" instead of
<br>> > "expanse." From this the argument is made that the
<br>> > Genesis account borrowed from creation myths that
<br>> > represent this "firmament" as a metal dome. But even
<br>> > the King James Version Bible, which uses "firmament,"
<br>> > says in the margin, "expansion." This is because the
<br>> > Hebrew word ra·qi´a', translated "expanse," means
to
<br>> > stretch out or spread out or expand.
<br>>
<br>> ===>That is an attempt to get away from the truth.
<br>> In fact the description fits perfectly with the verse from
<br>> Job: 'Clouds are a hiding place for Him, so that He cannot see;
<br>> And He walks on the vault of heaven.' Job 22:14
<p>I am not totally sure what the purpose of the quotation of these scriptures
<br>are supposed to mean as related to Jabriol's presentation, with which
I am
<br>in basic agreement.</blockquote>
===>They support the conclusion about what sort of cosmology
<br>the authors compiled in the Bible had in mind.
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>But I will give some comments regarding these
<br>scriptures.
<p>You say, 'What does God know? Can he judge through the thick darkness?
Thick
<br>clouds are a covering to him, so that he doesn't see. He walks on the
vault
<br>of the sky.'
<p>This is Eliphaz replying to Job. Eliphaz, of course, was one of Job's
false
<br>comforters, who was falsing accusing Job of hiding from God, claiming
that
<br>Job was saying that God cannot see through the clouds, etc. I see no
<br>relation, however, to what Jabriol posted concerning the second creative
<br>day.</blockquote>
===>It shows what the authors of the Bible believed about the
<br>"vault of the sky".
<br>And, of course, your snide reference to Eliphaz is irrelevant.
<br>As I also quoted -- see below -- other verses also
<br>support that same cosmology.
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Eliphaz would have it thought that Job was an Epicurean,
who did indeed
<br>believe in the existence of God, but denied his providence, and fancied
that
<br>he confined himself to the entertainments of the upper world and never
<br>concerned himself in the inhabitants and affairs of this. However,
even
<br>Eliphaz did not believe this to be true, as can be seen by the rest
of his
<br>statements; thus this was but his false accusation toward Job, that
Job was
<br>committing such a grave sin by treating God as such.
<p>Job's reply to Eliphaz was: "Oh that I knew where I might find him!
That I
<br>might come even to his seat!" (Job 23:3) And: "But he knows the way
that I
<br>take. When he has tried me, I shall come forth like gold." (Job 23:10)
<p>However, the word translated "vault" is Strong's #2329, which simply
means
<br>circuit or circle.
<br><a href="http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=02329">http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=02329</a></blockquote>
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>As such it simply seems to refer to the upper atmosphere
of the earth.
<br>Eliphaz' usage of this word, however, was to present a false idea of
God,
<br>which false idea he attributed to Job. Man, of course, is not hidden
from
<br>God behind some "vault" or covering.
<p>> One can just imagine YHWH's footsteps thundering
through
<br>> the "vault of heaven".
<br>> ALSO SEE: Amos 9:6
<br>> "The One who builds His upper chambers in the heavens
<br>> And has founded His vaulted dome over the earth"
<p>It is he who builds his chambers in the heavens, and has founded his
vault
<br>on the earth; he who calls for the waters of the sea, and pours them
out on
<br>the surface of the earth; Yahweh is his name. -- World English Bible
<br>translation.
<p>The word translated "vault" is Strong's Hebrew #92, transliterated
<br>"'aguddah"
<br><a href="http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=092&version=kjv">http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=092&version=kjv</a>
<p>It is one of those Hebrew words that carries various degrees of meaning,
and
<br>thus is often translated by different translators differently, depending
<br>upon with variation of meaning they believe applies. The book of Amos
is
<br>highly figuratively, and we should look upon it in this manner. The
prophecy
<br>is not about literal "fire" (Amos 1:4,7,10,14; 2:2), a literal "bar"
(Amos
<br>1:5); literal "wine" (Amos 2:12), etc., nor should the statment concerning
<br>God's building "chambers" and "vault" be taken literally.</blockquote>
===>WHAT A DODGE!
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>If the expression "vaulted dome" should be used,
as in the NAS, then it is
<br>simply figurative of the bounded limits that is set upon the earth,
or, it
<br>could be referring metaphorically to the bondage of corruption -- the
sinful
<br>nature -- that God has put upon his human creation on earth. (Romans
<br>1:26,28; 7:14; 8:3,15,21; Galatians 4:3; Hebrews 2:15) Or, "'aguddah"
could
<br>be translated either "binding" or "bands", relating to the limits of
man on
<br>the earth, or "troop" or "bundle", simply relating to the band or bundle
of
<br>sentient creatures on the earth.</blockquote>
===>NONSENSE!
<br>It is a cosmological statement which you are trying to explain away!
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>> So, indeed, the cosmology describes a VAULT/VAULTED
DOME
<br>> i.e. a FIRMAMENT, to which the tiny lights (stars) are affixed,
<br>> and which is the "storehouse" of the "waters above".
<p>Genesis 1:14 God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of sky to
divide
<br>the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons,
and for
<br>days and years; 15 and let them be for lights in the expanse of sky
to give
<br>light on the earth," and it was so. 16 God made the two great lights:
the
<br>greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night.
He
<br>also made the stars. 17 God set them in the expanse of sky to give
light to
<br>the earth, 18 and to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide
the
<br>light from the darkness. God saw that it was good. 19 There was evening
and
<br>there was morning, a fourth day.
<p>Of course, as I have stated in another thread, the "stars", and even
"sun"
<br>or "moon" referred to in the Bible do not necessarily correspond with
modern
<br>science's usage of the words star, sun and moon, and seldom does it
actually
<br>refer to the body of mass/energy itself, but rather simply to the light
as
<br>seen in the sky.</blockquote>
===>Of course.
<br>That is ALL the authors knew about!
<br>Their cosmology reflects what was seen by the naked eye.
<br>It proves the Bible is the WORD OF MEN.
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>The Bible was not written for the purpose of demonstrating
<br>modern scientific terminoloy nor satisfying scientific curiosity, and
<br>matters are not stated as perhaps most scientists would like to have
them
<br>stated.</blockquote>
===>Because the men who wrote it knew nothing of that sort.
<br>Had there been a "God" telling those stories, one would think
<br>such a being would have known better.
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Genesis 1:8 -- God called the expanse sky. There
was evening and there was
<br>morning, a second day. -- World English Bible
<p>The Bible says that God called the "firmament" -- the expanse -- "sky".
The
<br>expanse is the sky -- the atmosphere above us. It is in this sky --
as one
<br>looks from the surface of the earth -- that the luminaries of the sun,
moon,
<br>and stars are seen. Thus in the fourth creative day, we could reason
that
<br>either the vaporous clouds above the firmament expanded enough so that
the
<br>sun, moon and stars could be seen in the expanse below the waters above.
Or
<br>we could reason that, if there was some other obstruction outside the
<br>vaporous clouds above the firmament, that it was somehow removed so
that the
<br>sun, moon and stars could be seen in the expanse below the "waters
above."</blockquote>
===>You cannot "reason". Only apologetically SPECULATE
<br>how you might try to explain what is perfectly clear and not in need
of
<br>any explanation.
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>> The dome has openings ("windows") through which
YHWH lets down
<br>> some water occasionally, or lots of water when he wants to drown
<br>> all living creatures.
<br>> Genesis 7:11-12
<br>> ...the windows of heaven were opened.
<p>In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, on the
<br>seventeenth day of the month, on the same day all the fountains of
the great
<br>deep were burst open, and the sky's windows [sluice] were opened. The
rain
<br>was on the earth forty days and forty nights. -- Genesis 7:11,12, World
<br>English Bible
<p>In the six hundredth year of the life of Noah, in the second month,
in the
<br>seventeenth day of the month, in this day have been broken up all fountains
<br>of the great deep, and the net-work of the heavens hath been opened,
and the
<br>shower is on the earth forty days and forty nights. -- Young's Literal
<br>Translation
<p>When Noah was 600 years old, on the seventeenth day of the second month,
the
<br>underground waters burst forth on the earth, and the rain fell in mighty
<br>torrents from the sky. The rain continued to fall for forty days and
forty
<br>nights. -- New Living Translation
<p>Of course, in Genesis God did open the "sluice" (Strong's #699*) of
the
<br>skys, the clouded circle, or canopy, that circled the earth. I do not
see
<br>this opening of "windows" -- the sluice -- as supposed openings in
a
<br>supposed dome through which God caused it to rain, but rather as the
opening
<br>of "a body of water pent up behind a floodgate." (Merriam-Webster
<br>Dictionary**, under "sluice".) This would be the "waters above" that
is
<br>spoken of in the creative account.</blockquote>
===>Sluice or window or floodgate -- all the same thing.
<br>Nothing of that sort exists in reality, only in the imagination of
<br>the authors of the Bible.
<p> You cannot get away from
the FACT that the Bible uses
<br>a primitive cosmology that was common to the Near-Eastern
<br>peoples of its time.
<p> Libertarius
<br>============
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>
<br>==========
<br>* <a href="http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=0699">http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Hebrew/heb.cgi?number=0699</a>
<br>** <a href="http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary">http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary</a>
<p>Agape love,
<br>Ronald
<br><a href="http://reslight.addr.com/l-evolution.html">http://reslight.addr.com/l-evolution.html</a></blockquote>
</html>
--------------3DA93B774E584C7D8B850556--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|