"Jos Flachs" <'wcruise'@ksc15.th.com> wrote in message
news:vc9r20lqnrjmg1jvaftr9nda486lrcth3k@4ax.com...
On 14 Feb 2004 11:52:28 +1050, "le ténébreux"
<prince.d'aquitaine@tour.abolie> wrote:
Steve Makohin <smakohin@hotmail.com> wrote:
o There is not one iota of proof that deities exists.
o There is no plausible and scientifically validated theory
that suggests that deities *may* exist.
o For all *practical* purposes, deities do no exist in
reality (please note my emphasis).
A plausible and scientifically validated theory that a deity may
exist? How can it be scientifically validated if anyone who dares
to ask the question gets laughed out of town as a pseudo-scientist?
And who gets the final say about the "may" part?
When you ask scientists -
* Could life exist in other parts of our universe?
- "Of course."
* Could other universes and dimensions exist?
- "Sure, why not?"
* Could God, who is a life form in another universe or dimension, exist?
- "Don't be bleeding daft."
Why is this? What exactly is the problem?
You question.
If a god is a life form in another universe, dimension or on another
planet exists, is it exactly that. Another life form. Not a god, just
another life form.
And here lies your error.
how do you differentiate another Life from and God?
it because you fall under the beliefs, like the creationists do that God is
mytical and magical being. The Bible does not present God in that fashion at
all.
unless you are assuming that the only lifeform that exist must be biological
as we know it.
.
