TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands!



 Religions > Bible > TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands!

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Religions > Bible
User: "Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!"
Date: 12 Mar 2006 05:11:08 PM
Object: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands!
He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.

User: "Jude Alexander Jude_"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 07:39:45 PM
"Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!" <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
wrote in message news:9ea9129m0b93drftdk8eq9vej8jdbard43@4ax.com...


He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>

Craig, you HAVE to see this! It's at a foxworthy roast.... "DUHbya" makes
an appearance! lol
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/67551/jeff_foxworthy_standup/
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 10:52:51 PM
Jude Alexander wrote:

"Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!" <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
wrote in message news:9ea9129m0b93drftdk8eq9vej8jdbard43@4ax.com...


He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>


Craig, you HAVE to see this! It's at a foxworthy roast.... "DUHbya" makes
an appearance! lol

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/67551/jeff_foxworthy_standup/

That was hillarious!!!
I don't know who that was but he did a good job!!!
I liked the Saturday night crew that did all those impersonnations.
.
User: "Jude Alexander Jude_"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 09:40:39 AM
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1142225571.402964.228900@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


Jude Alexander wrote:

"Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!" <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
wrote in message news:9ea9129m0b93drftdk8eq9vej8jdbard43@4ax.com...


He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>


Craig, you HAVE to see this! It's at a foxworthy roast.... "DUHbya"
makes
an appearance! lol

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/67551/jeff_foxworthy_standup/



That was hillarious!!!

I don't know who that was but he did a good job!!!

Didn't he! lol His name is Steve Bridges and you can see a few more clips
of his presidential spoof at : http://www.stevebridges.com


I liked the Saturday night crew that did all those impersonnations.

There's a guy on Mad TV that does an even better one than the Saturday night
crew members. However, NOBODY comes close to Steve Bridges! lol


.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 04:23:51 PM
Jude Alexander wrote:

"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1142225571.402964.228900@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...


Jude Alexander wrote:

"Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!" <xanadu222@mchsi.com>
wrote in message news:9ea9129m0b93drftdk8eq9vej8jdbard43@4ax.com...


He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>


Craig, you HAVE to see this! It's at a foxworthy roast.... "DUHbya"
makes
an appearance! lol

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/67551/jeff_foxworthy_standup/



That was hillarious!!!

I don't know who that was but he did a good job!!!


Didn't he! lol His name is Steve Bridges and you can see a few more clips
of his presidential spoof at : http://www.stevebridges.com


I liked the Saturday night crew that did all those impersonnations.


There's a guy on Mad TV that does an even better one than the Saturday night
crew members. However, NOBODY comes close to Steve Bridges! lol

I agree, I had to do a double take because he was so convincing. From
facial expressions, hand gestures, and even the voice. Absolutely
hillarious...thank you for showing us that link.


.
User: "Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 16 Mar 2006 06:04:19 AM
On 13 Mar 2006 14:23:51 -0800,
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Jude Alexander wrote:

"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Jude Alexander wrote:

"Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>


Craig, you HAVE to see this! It's at a foxworthy roast....
"DUHbya" makes an appearance! lol

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/67551/jeff_foxworthy_standup/

LOL!!! I love that line, "Manhattan is an island. An island
completely surrounded by water."
Thanks for the great link! It's fascinating that any person could have
been born BOTH as such a startling look-alike for Bush AND have the
talent to imitate him so perfectly.

That was hillarious!!!

I don't know who that was but he did a good job!!!

Didn't he! lol His name is Steve Bridges and you can see a few
more clips of his presidential spoof at : http://www.stevebridges.com

I liked the Saturday night crew that did all those impersonnations.

There's a guy on Mad TV that does an even better one than the Saturday night
crew members. However, NOBODY comes close to Steve Bridges! lol

I agree, I had to do a double take because he was so convincing. From
facial expressions, hand gestures, and even the voice. Absolutely
hillarious...thank you for showing us that link.

I second that! It was hilarious! And it looked and sounded SO
much like Bush, it had me wondering for a few minutes. The biggest
clue that it wasn't really him was the Presidential Seal on the rostrum,
which was only similar to the real thing. I guess it must be illegal for
someone to do a send-up using the real deal, or Bridges probably would
have used it for an even more enhanced simulation.
-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
.
User: "Vandar"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood onWarmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 17 Mar 2006 11:29:39 AM
Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!! wrote:

On 13 Mar 2006 14:23:51 -0800,
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Jude Alexander wrote:

"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Jude Alexander wrote:

"Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:




He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>


Craig, you HAVE to see this! It's at a foxworthy roast....
"DUHbya" makes an appearance! lol

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/67551/jeff_foxworthy_standup/



LOL!!! I love that line, "Manhattan is an island. An island
completely surrounded by water."

Thanks for the great link! It's fascinating that any person could have
been born BOTH as such a startling look-alike for Bush AND have the
talent to imitate him so perfectly.


That was hillarious!!!

I don't know who that was but he did a good job!!!



Didn't he! lol His name is Steve Bridges and you can see a few
more clips of his presidential spoof at : http://www.stevebridges.com



I liked the Saturday night crew that did all those impersonnations.



There's a guy on Mad TV that does an even better one than the Saturday night
crew members. However, NOBODY comes close to Steve Bridges! lol



I agree, I had to do a double take because he was so convincing. From
facial expressions, hand gestures, and even the voice. Absolutely
hillarious...thank you for showing us that link.



I second that! It was hilarious! And it looked and sounded SO
much like Bush, it had me wondering for a few minutes. The biggest
clue that it wasn't really him was the Presidential Seal on the rostrum,
which was only similar to the real thing. I guess it must be illegal for
someone to do a send-up using the real deal, or Bridges probably would
have used it for an even more enhanced simulation.

It's also illegal for an American serviceman to be sent to the Hague,
but that doesn't seem to stop you from whining for it.
.
User: "Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 18 Mar 2006 08:45:00 AM
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:29:39 GMT,
"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com> wrote:

"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Jude Alexander wrote:

"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Jude Alexander wrote:

Craig Chilton <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote:

He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

Craig, you HAVE to see this! It's at a foxworthy roast....
"DUHbya" makes an appearance! lol

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/67551/jeff_foxworthy_standup/

LOL!!! I love that line, "Manhattan is an island. An island
completely surrounded by water."

Thanks for the great link! It's fascinating that any person could have
been born BOTH as such a startling look-alike for Bush AND have the
talent to imitate him so perfectly.

That was hillarious!!!

I don't know who that was but he did a good job!!!

Didn't he! lol His name is Steve Bridges and you can see a few
more clips of his presidential spoof at : http://www.stevebridges.com

I liked the Saturday night crew that did all those impersonnations.

There's a guy on Mad TV that does an even better one than the
Saturday night crew members. However, NOBODY comes close
to Steve Bridges! lol

I agree, I had to do a double take because he was so convincing. From
facial expressions, hand gestures, and even the voice. Absolutely
hillarious...thank you for showing us that link.

I second that! It was hilarious! And it looked and sounded SO
much like Bush, it had me wondering for a few minutes. The biggest
clue that it wasn't really him was the Presidential Seal on the rostrum,
which was only similar to the real thing. I guess it must be illegal for
someone to do a send-up using the real deal, or Bridges probably would
have used it for an even more enhanced simulation.

It's also illegal for an American serviceman to be sent to the Hague,
but that doesn't seem to stop you from [supporting that concept].

Nazis whined at Nuremberg that they were "only carrying out orders."
The world was relieved to see how far THAT got them.
The same thing should be applicable to every soldier who has ever
MURDERED an Iraqi "under orders" -- as has happened to tens of
thousands of iraqis, and continues.
And whatever fate would have befallen Hitler, had he been captured
alive, should be the SAME as that which will ultimately befall Warmonger-
in-Thief Bush... the worst mass-murderer the world has seen since
Pol Pot.
It's time for some NEW Nuremberg trials.
--Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>
---
"Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible
government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility
to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the
unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the
first task of the statesmanship of the day."
-- Theodore Roosevelt, on April 19, 1906
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
.





User: "Bill Baker"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 11:26:02 PM
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 20:52:51 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
in message news:<1142225571.402964.228900@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>...

Jude Alexander wrote:

"Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:9ea9129m0b93drftdk8eq9vej8jdbard43@4ax.com...


He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>


Craig, you HAVE to see this! It's at a foxworthy roast.... "DUHbya"
makes an appearance! lol

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/67551/jeff_foxworthy_standup/



That was hillarious!!!

I don't know who that was but he did a good job!!!

I agree. It was hilarious. Steve Bridges was his name. You can read
more about him and view more of his clips here:
http://www.stevebridges.com

I liked the Saturday night crew that did all those impersonnations.

--
Q. How many people with ADD does it take to change a light bulb?
A. Let's go ride a bike.
.



User: "G-Net"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 07:08:52 PM
By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for the deaths
as you are. How about blaming the people who really are responsible, the
terrorists!
"Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!" <xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote
in message news:9ea9129m0b93drftdk8eq9vej8jdbard43@4ax.com...


He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>

.
User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 10:23:42 AM
G-Net <netnerve@verizon.net> wrote:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for the deaths
as you are.

He lied to justify a war that has killed tens of thousands of people.

How about blaming the people who really are responsible, the
terrorists!

Terorrism wasn't an issue in Bush's decision to invade Iraq.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.

User: "osprey"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 07:31:56 PM
G-Net wrote:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for the deaths
as you are. How about blaming the people who really are responsible, the
terrorists!

Battle of Iwo Jima, more than 21,000 U.S. Troops were killed. And that
was just one of the battles of WWII.
Although I don't like to see any of our men and/or women killed, I
think our military has gotten a LOT better.
These moron's don't know anything else but how to just ***** and
complain. If Bush was a liberal, they would be singing songs of praise.
.
User: "G-Net"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 09:38:30 AM
I absolutely agree with you! If Bush takes action, the liberals complain that he
shouldn't have and that he's a "war monger". If he doesn't take action then they
say that he doesn't care and isn't doing his job.
If he believes the intelligence he gets then somehow the flawed intelligence is
HIS fault. If he doesn't believe the flawed intelligence then they'll say that
he KNEW that there was a threat but didn't respond.
Either way, the liberals THINK that President Bush is wrong. It's too bad for
the liberals that there are lots of people in this country who can actually
think for themselves instead of believing all of the liberally biased, crap that
the media is putting out. Some of the people who blame President Bush for the
dealths and terrorism must be walking around with their heads up their butt
because they don't want to know the truth.....
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1142213516.282164.267320@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...


G-Net wrote:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for the
deaths
as you are. How about blaming the people who really are responsible, the
terrorists!



Battle of Iwo Jima, more than 21,000 U.S. Troops were killed. And that
was just one of the battles of WWII.

Although I don't like to see any of our men and/or women killed, I
think our military has gotten a LOT better.

These moron's don't know anything else but how to just ***** and
complain. If Bush was a liberal, they would be singing songs of praise.

.
User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 04:22:52 PM
In News WlgRf.39273$CI6.32751@trnddc07,, G-Net at netnerve@verizon.net,
typed this:

I absolutely agree with you! If Bush takes action, the liberals
complain that he shouldn't have and that he's a "war monger". If he
doesn't take action then they say that he doesn't care and isn't
doing his job.

*****. Liberals, as well as many moderates, were telling Bush that the
war was a very bad Idea in 2003. Now, it's proven to be a very bad idea,
and we now know that Bush lied his ***** off to get us into the war.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5217645
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. – Thomas Jefferson
.


User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 08:33:47 PM
In article <1142213516.282164.267320@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

G-Net wrote:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for the
deaths
as you are. How about blaming the people who really are responsible, the
terrorists!



Battle of Iwo Jima, more than 21,000 U.S. Troops were killed. And that
was just one of the battles of WWII.

Although I don't like to see any of our men and/or women killed, I
think our military has gotten a LOT better.

These moron's don't know anything else but how to just ***** and
complain. If Bush was a liberal, they would be singing songs of praise.

If Bush was liberal we wouldn't be selling out our country to big
business. If Bush were president during WORLD WAR II, we would have
hired a Japanese company to guard Pearl Harbor.
.


User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 07:34:43 PM
In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at netnerve@verizon.net, typed
this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for
the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who really are
responsible, the terrorists!

Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two senate
committees said that there was no evidence to support a connection to
terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003. So, Bush lies, starts a war,
which attracts insurgency and terrorists, then you want to blame the
terrorists for the people dying in Iraq? Sounds like conservative logic I
guess.

"Craig Chilton -- IMPEACH Perfidious Bush... NOW!!"
<xanadu222@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:9ea9129m0b93drftdk8eq9vej8jdbard43@4ax.com...


He is 'WAY overdue to be IMPEACHED and BOUNCED!

-- Craig Chilton <xanadu222_@mchsi.com>

--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. – Thomas Jefferson
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 07:48:46 PM
Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at netnerve@verizon.net, typed
this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for
the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who really are
responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two senate
committees said that there was no evidence to support a connection to
terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction
in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons
of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and
security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9,
1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam
is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have
always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear
program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists,
including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left
unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to
wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop
nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
.
User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 07:59:53 PM
In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for
the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who really are
responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,

All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's flawed
intelligence reports to form their opinions.
Bush lied, and we all know it. Here's the proof:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5217645
Bush choose the intelligence that he showed to congress, championing only
that intelligence that supported his pre-made decision to go to war, and
suppressing all intelligence that did not support that decision. He lied,
people died, and now he's turned most of the country of Iraq into a killing
field far, far, worse than anything that existed under Hussien.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 10:36:42 PM
Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for
the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who really are
responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's flawed
intelligence reports to form their opinions.

ROFL
You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were PRIOR
to Bush's first election.
<snip>
If you can't read what I posted, I don't need to bother reading your
nonsense.
You would be singing a different tune if Bush was a Democrat..you would
be singing songs of praise.
Hell, you just got done saying that the Democrats couldn't think for
themselves.
I'll give you another chance
I'll even cut out the ones after Bush's election and see what your
excuse is now.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons
of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and
security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9,
1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
Now, what's your excuse????
.
User: "james g. keegan jr."

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 08:22:24 PM
In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
"osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's flawed
intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

have you apologized for your lie about mimi shown below?
"To anyone reading my words let it be known that Mimi Cohen is aka:
Krisblake, Pauline, Gia, Somewriter, and several other nicks."
--"osprey" <noneedtok...@mail.com>
news:1130988022.230071.12110@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:
run away now, coward bobby. run. run.
.

User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 12 Mar 2006 10:57:04 PM
In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible for
the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who really are
responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's flawed
intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were PRIOR
to Bush's first election.

<snip>
If you can't read what I posted, I don't need to bother reading your
nonsense.

You would be singing a different tune if Bush was a Democrat..you would
be singing songs of praise.

Hell, you just got done saying that the Democrats couldn't think for
themselves.


I'll give you another chance

I'll even cut out the ones after Bush's election and see what your
excuse is now.



"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons
of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and
security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9,
1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and
he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999




Now, what's your excuse????

No excuses needed. It was BUSH who got us into this mess, along with
your armchair warriors. Clinton and other had the self control and
intelligence to do what was best for the country and not for big
business. Thousands of American have died because pussies like you
wanted to feel better and invade a middle eastern country.
.
User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 04:45:26 AM

In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible
for the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who
really are responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's
flawed intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were PRIOR
to Bush's first election.

Again, all irrelevant to the fact that Bush was the one that got us into the
war. He lied to get us there, and he continues to lie to keep us there.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5217645
While others may have believed that he needed to be deposed, particularly
back in the mid-1990's when he may actually still have had the WMD's, no one
but Bush lied to take us into war. He cherry picked only the intelligence
that supported his decision to go to war. You can quote a thousand people,
but none of it changes that fact. There was no connection with Iraq to
terrorists prior to the U.S. invasion, and if you'll remember, recent events
in Iraq have gone almost exactly as I predicted they would to you in a
thread almost a year ago. The insurgency has gotten worse, not better, and
now Iraq is on the verge of civil war. Bush has botched this at every
turn, and has put the country into ever worsening debt to do it. Those are
the facts, and it doesn't make a tinker's damned who you quote, no one but
Bush lied to put us in this situation.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 07:20:04 AM
Andrealphus wrote:

In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible
for the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who
really are responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's
flawed intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were PRIOR
to Bush's first election.


<snip>
I have heard this all before and as I said before, liberals would be
singing songs of praise for Bush if he was a Democrat.
The hypocrisy has no end when it comes to liberals.
.
User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 04:21:30 PM
In News 1142256004.622811.85210@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com,, osprey at
noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible
for the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who
really are responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's
flawed intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were
PRIOR to Bush's first election.



<snip>

I have heard this all before

To bad you're too much of a ***** to actually adress the points. Bush lied,
people have died, those are the indisputable facts.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5217645
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.

User: "David W. Barnes"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 09:47:41 AM
In article <1142256004.622811.85210@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible
for the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who
really are responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's
flawed intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were PRIOR
to Bush's first election.



<snip>

I have heard this all before

That happens with the truth. Only lies change daily.

and as I said before, liberals would be
singing songs of praise for Bush if he was a Democrat.

Your bigotry is not proof.


The hypocrisy has no end when it comes to liberals.

Osprey hates liberals. Being anti-American is his "thing."
.
User: "Johnny Lingo"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 05:49:20 PM
"David W. Barnes" <dbarnes@aol.com> wrote in message
news:130320060747416113%dbarnes@aol.com...

In article <1142256004.622811.85210@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible
for the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who
really are responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's
flawed intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were PRIOR
to Bush's first election.



<snip>

I have heard this all before


That happens with the truth. Only lies change daily.

and as I said before, liberals would be
singing songs of praise for Bush if he was a Democrat.


Your bigotry is not proof.


The hypocrisy has no end when it comes to liberals.


Osprey hates liberals. Being anti-American is his "thing."

What's the matter Davey? You keeping running away!
.


User: "Bill Baker"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 09:15:03 PM
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:20:04 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
in message news:<1142256004.622811.85210@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>...


Andrealphus wrote:

In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible
for the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who
really are responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's
flawed intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were PRIOR
to Bush's first election.



<snip>

I have heard this all before and as I said before, liberals would be
singing songs of praise for Bush if he was a Democrat.

The hypocrisy has no end when it comes to liberals.

Osprey, weren't you complaining about people making assumptions and about
"stereotypical B.S."? I can personally say, as a liberal, that if Bush
were a Democrat I would dislike his actions just as much, and would not
"sing songs of praise" for him. I think that he is incompetent as a
president, regardless of his political affiliations.
--
Bushism 3-6:
"It's important for us to explain to our nation that life is important. It's
not only life of babies, but it's life of children living in, you know, the dark
dungeons of the Internet."
--Arlington Heights, Illinois; October 24, 2000
.
User: "osprey"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 14 Mar 2006 12:51:46 AM
Bill Baker wrote:

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:20:04 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
in message news:<1142256004.622811.85210@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>...


Andrealphus wrote:

In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible
for the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who
really are responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's
flawed intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were PRIOR
to Bush's first election.



<snip>

I have heard this all before and as I said before, liberals would be
singing songs of praise for Bush if he was a Democrat.

The hypocrisy has no end when it comes to liberals.


Osprey, weren't you complaining about people making assumptions and about
"stereotypical B.S."?

Yep
I can personally say, as a liberal, that if Bush

were a Democrat

I said liberals, not democrats. I can respect a democrat and I am sure
there are plenty of democrats who can be fair and impartial. I have
never met a liberal who is honest, fair, and/or impartial. There is a
difference
I would dislike his actions just as much, and would not

"sing songs of praise" for him. I think that he is incompetent as a
president, regardless of his political affiliations.

I am not too happy with Bush either
Have a nice night.
.
User: "Bill Baker"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 14 Mar 2006 11:07:50 PM
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 22:51:46 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
in message news:<1142312189.828237.300850@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>...


Bill Baker wrote:

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:20:04 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote
in message news:<1142256004.622811.85210@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>...


Andrealphus wrote:

In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible
for the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who
really are responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war? Two
senate committees said that there was no evidence to support a
connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March 2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's
flawed intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were PRIOR
to Bush's first election.



<snip>

I have heard this all before and as I said before, liberals would be
singing songs of praise for Bush if he was a Democrat.

The hypocrisy has no end when it comes to liberals.


Osprey, weren't you complaining about people making assumptions and about
"stereotypical B.S."?


Yep

I can personally say, as a liberal, that if Bush
were a Democrat


I said liberals, not democrats.

Yes, that's why I said "as a liberal". I am not loyal to the Democrat
party.

I can respect a democrat and I am sure there are plenty of democrats who
can be fair and impartial. I have never met a liberal who is honest,
fair, and/or impartial. There is a difference

I'm a liberal. Try me.

I would dislike his actions just as much, and would not "sing songs of
praise" for him. I think that he is incompetent as a president,
regardless of his political affiliations.


I am not too happy with Bush either

Have a nice night.

You too.
--
Funny Thurgood quote #4:
"I can do more for your buns than any queer can."
.

User: "Ray Fischer"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 14 Mar 2006 01:21:19 AM
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:


Bill Baker wrote:
I can personally say, as a liberal, that if Bush

were a Democrat


I said liberals, not democrats. I can respect a democrat and I am sure
there are plenty of democrats who can be fair and impartial. I have
never met a liberal who is honest, fair, and/or impartial. There is a
difference

Jesus was a liberal.
I can see why you might hate Jesus.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
.


User: "Andrealphus"

Title: Re: TODAY, 3-12-06, in Iraq: 40 dead & 200 wounded. MORE blood on Warmonger-in-Thief Bush's hands! 13 Mar 2006 09:26:11 PM
In News pan.2006.03.14.03.14.52.951803@postini.spamcon.org,, Bill Baker at
wbaker@postini.spamcon.org, typed this:

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:20:04 -0800, "osprey" <noneedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote in message
news:<1142256004.622811.85210@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>...


Andrealphus wrote:

In article <1142224602.519639.264530@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News 1142214526.611668.157830@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com,,
osprey at noneedtoknow@mail.com, typed this:

Andrealphus wrote:

In News EC3Rf.38027$CI6.1011@trnddc07,, G-Net at
netnerve@verizon.net, typed this:

By "he" do you mean, President Bush? He is about as responsible
for the deaths as you are. How about blaming the people who
really are responsible, the terrorists!


Just where werer the terroists in Iraq prior to Bush's war?
Two senate committees said that there was no evidence to
support a connection to terrorists and Hussien prior to March
2003.



"Without question,


All irrelevant since all of those people were relying on Bush's
flawed intelligence reports to form their opinions.


ROFL

You didn't even read the dates on the quotes, many of them were
PRIOR to Bush's first election.



<snip>

I have heard this all before and as I said before, liberals would be
singing songs of praise for Bush if he was a Democrat.

The hypocrisy has no end when it comes to liberals.


Osprey, weren't you complaining about people making assumptions and
about "stereotypical B.S."? I can personally say, as a liberal, that
if Bush were a Democrat I would dislike his actions just as much, and
would not "sing songs of praise" for him. I think that he is
incompetent as a president, regardless of his political affiliations.

Osprey has shown himself completely incapable of being anything but a
partisan hack. Nevermind that I, and many others that he deems "liberals"
heavily critisized Clinton for the debacle in Somolia. Whenever you
critisize Bush, he immediately runs behind the skirts of statements made in
previous years, when the topic was clearly why the war started in 2003.
Bush lied, and he counted on congress to rely on those lies. It wouldn't
matter to me if Bush was Liberal, Conservative, or anything in between, he's
an incompitent, lying sack of *****.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
.











  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER