Religions > Bible > Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding!
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"Yang, AthD h.c" |
| Date: |
29 May 2007 08:30:16 PM |
| Object: |
Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
--
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3468 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
| User: "johac" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 12:38:08 AM |
|
|
In article <erjp53di472aiojntcrobk9627fmghp1eu@4ax.com>,
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
Indeed the surge is working. The violence and death count are surging.
--
John #1782
"We should always be disposed to believe that which appears to us to be
white is really black, if the hierarchy of the church so decides."
- Saint Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) Founder of the Jesuit Order.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
29 May 2007 11:44:52 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <erjp53di472aiojntcrobk9627fmghp1eu@4ax.com>
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
Mission Accomplished?
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ben Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 07:04:29 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2007 14:14:52 +0930, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
- Refer: <erjp53di472aiojntcrobk9627fmghp1eu@4ax.com>
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
Mission Accomplished?
If the mission was to make Clinton's lying under oath about not having
extramarital sex look like a drop in the ocean I say YES.
Ben
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 08:56:56 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 03:58:33 PM |
|
|
Bob wrote:
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
Yeah - it would be crazy to think that this increase in
US-backed violence against the Iraqi people would come without
consequences.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 10:55:26 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Then against, Bush and the Neocons are all about Pyrhhic defeats, so
long as someone else is paying the price.
--
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3468 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 01:28:52 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
Then against, Bush and the Neocons are all about Pyrhhic defeats, so
long as someone else is paying the price.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DH" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 12:33:01 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote in message
news:rfgr53hinu88mot7b153tn4rllp7422gq7@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
You are right and the strategy of placing the troops out among the general
population in much smaller groups is an extremely risky one for those
troops. They are very exposed. In fact, I'm a bit surprised that the death
toll isn't higher still but perhaps, just perhaps, this strategy is
working. Or it's also possible that the number of highly exposed units is
actually quite small. Or their constant vigilance is keeping them alive.
Then against, Bush and the Neocons are all about Pyrhhic defeats, so
long as someone else is paying the price.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Budikka666" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 04:52:35 PM |
|
|
On May 30, 12:33 pm, "DH" <d...@stargate.com> wrote:
"Bob" <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote in message
news:rfgr53hinu88mot7b153tn4rllp7422gq7@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
You are right and the strategy of placing the troops out among the general
population in much smaller groups is an extremely risky one for those
troops. They are very exposed. In fact, I'm a bit surprised that the death
toll isn't higher still but perhaps, just perhaps, this strategy is
working. Or it's also possible that the number of highly exposed units is
actually quite small. Or their constant vigilance is keeping them alive.
Or the stupidity of this so-called stategy is killing 'em off faster.
The incident the other day where the helo was shot down is a prime
example. The guys sent in to rescue the helo crew were hit by an IED,
and the guys sent in to rescue *those* guys were hit by another IED.
Now where did we see *that* before? Oh yeah - the start of one of the
"Hot Shots" movies.
Prior to that, we had three soldiers kidnapped while on patrol and
"support" took the best part of an hour to get there.
If this is the "strategy", to put more small patrols out there,
they're going to get swatted like flies.
Budikka
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 05:22:07 PM |
|
|
Budikka666 wrote:
Prior to that, we had three soldiers kidnapped while on patrol and
"support" took the best part of an hour to get there.
If this is the "strategy", to put more small patrols out there,
they're going to get swatted like flies.
Bush has to get those soldiers killed more and more.
Elsewise, he won't be able to convince his followers that the
Iraqis are a threat.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Christopher A.Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 06:25:35 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:22:07 -0400, Sanders Kaufman
<bucky@kaufman.net> wrote:
Budikka666 wrote:
Prior to that, we had three soldiers kidnapped while on patrol and
"support" took the best part of an hour to get there.
If this is the "strategy", to put more small patrols out there,
they're going to get swatted like flies.
Bush has to get those soldiers killed more and more.
Elsewise, he won't be able to convince his followers that the
Iraqis are a threat.
We'll stay there to punish them as long as they kill our troops
because they don't want us there in the first place.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sanders Kaufman" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 05:14:37 PM |
|
|
Bob wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
Well then - that makes all of those additional US deaths OK
then, doesn't it?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 04:17:18 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
- Refer: <rfgr53hinu88mot7b153tn4rllp7422gq7@4ax.com>
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
Why aren't you there?
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 04:42:56 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 May 2007 06:47:18 +0930, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
- Refer: <rfgr53hinu88mot7b153tn4rllp7422gq7@4ax.com>
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
Why aren't you there?
Because I couldn't handle military life, because I think the whole
Iraq adventure is idiotic, and because it's fucking dangerous.
Why do you ask?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
30 May 2007 08:28:23 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2007 21:42:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
- Refer: <sg2s53thme8d9pgsfev3372r2vqov1rv8a@4ax.com>
On Thu, 31 May 2007 06:47:18 +0930, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
- Refer: <rfgr53hinu88mot7b153tn4rllp7422gq7@4ax.com>
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
Why aren't you there?
Because I couldn't handle military life, because I think the whole
Iraq adventure is idiotic, and because it's fucking dangerous.
Why do you ask?
Because I wished to know the answer.
You appear to be under the impression that there is a plan.
--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 09:04:50 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 May 2007 10:58:23 +0930, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 21:42:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
- Refer: <sg2s53thme8d9pgsfev3372r2vqov1rv8a@4ax.com>
On Thu, 31 May 2007 06:47:18 +0930, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
- Refer: <rfgr53hinu88mot7b153tn4rllp7422gq7@4ax.com>
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
Why aren't you there?
Because I couldn't handle military life, because I think the whole
Iraq adventure is idiotic, and because it's fucking dangerous.
Why do you ask?
Because I wished to know the answer.
You appear to be under the impression that there is a plan.
Of course there is a plan. May not be much of plan, but there is one.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Gray" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
01 Jun 2007 12:24:18 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 May 2007 19:04:50 -0700, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
- Refer: <lkvu5353brisu90nmouhrsij54e6h17tue@4ax.com>
On Thu, 31 May 2007 10:58:23 +0930, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 21:42:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
- Refer: <sg2s53thme8d9pgsfev3372r2vqov1rv8a@4ax.com>
On Thu, 31 May 2007 06:47:18 +0930, Michael Gray
<mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
- Refer: <rfgr53hinu88mot7b153tn4rllp7422gq7@4ax.com>
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
Why aren't you there?
Because I couldn't handle military life, because I think the whole
Iraq adventure is idiotic, and because it's fucking dangerous.
Why do you ask?
Because I wished to know the answer.
You appear to be under the impression that there is a plan.
Of course there is a plan. May not be much of plan, but there is one.
Any chance of letting on as to what it is?
The free world wants to know what your theocratic cacoplutocracy is
"planning".
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 10:25:53 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
“A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military’s death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years.” With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
And that might be considered a "success" if it weren't for the fact
that May also saw in INCREASE in Iraqi civilian deaths.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/death-squad-killings-spike/
Then against, Bush and the Neocons are all about Pyrhhic defeats, so
long as someone else is paying the price.
--
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3468 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 10:28:00 AM |
|
|
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:utpt53p11kv2o7jdudqpki9fuk9j7ej4tg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
And that might be considered a "success" if it weren't for the fact
that May also saw in INCREASE in Iraqi civilian deaths.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/death-squad-killings-spike/
If we were to pull out all of our troops today, and suicide bombers
continued to kill Iraqi civilians...
Would you care about their deaths?
Would you want something done about it?
Or would you do like many liberals did prior to the war, and turn their
backs on them?
.
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ride" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 01:49:23 PM |
|
|
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in message
news:IfydneVsX_gfdMPbnZ2dnUVZ_vShnZ2d@comcast.com...
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in message
news:utpt53p11kv2o7jdudqpki9fuk9j7ej4tg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <blah@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
And that might be considered a "success" if it weren't for the fact
that May also saw in INCREASE in Iraqi civilian deaths.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/death-squad-killings-spike/
If we were to pull out all of our troops today, and suicide bombers
continued to kill Iraqi civilians...
Would you care about their deaths?
Would you want something done about it?
Or would you do like many liberals did prior to the war, and turn their
backs on them?
lol.
--
Aloha, G-Ride
The force that's forcing you to feel like busting up a Starbucks.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 11:28:13 AM |
|
|
On 31 Mai, 17:28, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in messagenews:utpt53p11kv2o7jdudqpki9fuk9j7ej4tg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
And that might be considered a "success" if it weren't for the fact
that May also saw in INCREASE in Iraqi civilian deaths.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/death-squad-killings-spike/
If we were to pull out all of our troops today, and suicide bombers
continued to kill Iraqi civilians...
Would you care about their deaths?
Would you want something done about it?
Or would you do like many liberals did prior to the war, and turn their
backs on them?-
How should we describe this last sentence? As a lie or as another
symptom of rightards' bigotry?
BTW, Iraq was stable before the USA invaded this country for no
reason.
.
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ride" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 01:50:23 PM |
|
|
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180628893.234805.267200@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
On 31 Mai, 17:28, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
messagenews:utpt53p11kv2o7jdudqpki9fuk9j7ej4tg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third
deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
And that might be considered a "success" if it weren't for the fact
that May also saw in INCREASE in Iraqi civilian deaths.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/death-squad-killings-spike/
If we were to pull out all of our troops today, and suicide bombers
continued to kill Iraqi civilians...
Would you care about their deaths?
Would you want something done about it?
Or would you do like many liberals did prior to the war, and turn their
backs on them?-
How should we describe this last sentence? As a lie or as another
symptom of rightards' bigotry?
BTW, Iraq was stable before the USA invaded this country for no
reason.
I'd say it's a bit of both - a lie and a symptom of bigotry.
--
Aloha, G-Ride
The force that's forcing you to feel like busting up a Starbucks.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 11:56:21 AM |
|
|
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180628893.234805.267200@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
On 31 Mai, 17:28, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
messagenews:utpt53p11kv2o7jdudqpki9fuk9j7ej4tg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-high/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more than
two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the third
deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov. 2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more than
the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
And that might be considered a "success" if it weren't for the fact
that May also saw in INCREASE in Iraqi civilian deaths.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/death-squad-killings-spike/
If we were to pull out all of our troops today, and suicide bombers
continued to kill Iraqi civilians...
Would you care about their deaths?
Would you want something done about it?
Or would you do like many liberals did prior to the war, and turn their
backs on them?-
How should we describe this last sentence? As a lie or as another
symptom of rightards' bigotry?
BTW, Iraq was stable before the USA invaded this country for no
reason.
So those hundreds of thousands of Iraqis that we discovered in mass graves,
is what you call stability.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Stone" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 11:29:30 AM |
|
|
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:Xr-dnXayHtyrY8PbnZ2dnUVZ_uKknZ2d@comcast.com:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180628893.234805.267200@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
On 31 Mai, 17:28, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
messagenews:utpt53p11kv2o7jdudqpki9fuk9j7ej4tg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-
hi
gh/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more
than two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the
third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov.
2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't
increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more
than the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
And that might be considered a "success" if it weren't for the
fact that May also saw in INCREASE in Iraqi civilian deaths.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/death-squad-killings-spike/
If we were to pull out all of our troops today, and suicide bombers
continued to kill Iraqi civilians...
Would you care about their deaths?
Would you want something done about it?
Or would you do like many liberals did prior to the war, and turn
their backs on them?-
How should we describe this last sentence? As a lie or as another
symptom of rightards' bigotry?
BTW, Iraq was stable before the USA invaded this country for no
reason.
So those hundreds of thousands of Iraqis that we discovered in mass
graves, is what you call stability.
I wonder how these liberals would like living in such a stable country?
--
Fred Stone
aa# 1369
"When they put out that deadline, people realized that we were going to
lose," said an aide to an anti-war lawmaker. "Everything after that
seemed like posturing."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "G-Ride" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 01:48:34 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9941881283C73freddybear@66.150.105.47...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:Xr-dnXayHtyrY8PbnZ2dnUVZ_uKknZ2d@comcast.com:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180628893.234805.267200@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
On 31 Mai, 17:28, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
messagenews:utpt53p11kv2o7jdudqpki9fuk9j7ej4tg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-
hi
gh/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more
than two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the
third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov.
2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't
increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more
than the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
And that might be considered a "success" if it weren't for the
fact that May also saw in INCREASE in Iraqi civilian deaths.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/death-squad-killings-spike/
If we were to pull out all of our troops today, and suicide bombers
continued to kill Iraqi civilians...
Would you care about their deaths?
Would you want something done about it?
Or would you do like many liberals did prior to the war, and turn
their backs on them?-
How should we describe this last sentence? As a lie or as another
symptom of rightards' bigotry?
BTW, Iraq was stable before the USA invaded this country for no
reason.
So those hundreds of thousands of Iraqis that we discovered in mass
graves, is what you call stability.
I wonder how these liberals would like living in such a stable country?
I wonder how you would like living in Iraq now Fred? After all, you've
stated that it is a good thing that Iraq has become the "central fight in
the war on terror" as the result of the US invasion of that country. Too
bad you and your gods didn't bother to ask the Iraqi people if they wanted
that particular honor. But don't let the established fact that you don't
actually care about Iraqi lives or their stability get in the way of trying
to blame the mess you continue to cheerlead on liberals.
--
Aloha, G-Ride
The force that's forcing you to feel like busting up a Starbucks.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Troop Death Hits Two-Year High. The Surge Is Suceeding! |
31 May 2007 01:12:17 PM |
|
|
"Fred Stone" <fstone69@earthling.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9941881283C73freddybear@66.150.105.47...
"Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com> wrote in
news:Xr-dnXayHtyrY8PbnZ2dnUVZ_uKknZ2d@comcast.com:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180628893.234805.267200@a26g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
On 31 Mai, 17:28, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com> wrote:
"Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote in
messagenews:utpt53p11kv2o7jdudqpki9fuk9j7ej4tg@4ax.com...
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:28:52 -0700, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 15:55:26 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 13:56:56 GMT, Bob <b...@blahhhh.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:30:16 GMT, "Yang, AthD (h.c)"
<eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com> wrote:
"The Surge is Succedding"
-Fred Stone, 3/11/2007
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/29/troop-deaths-hit-two-year-
hi
gh/
"A series of fatalities announced on Tuesday in Iraq saw the US
military's death toll rise to its highest monthly level in more
than two years." With 114 deaths so far, May is already the
third deadliest
month of the war, with the highest fatality rate since Nov.
2004.
To be fair, with increased troop levels and having them act more
proactively it would be surprising if casualties didn't
increase.
The death count since the "surge" is up by about 50%, far more
than the proprotion of troop level increases.
Yes, but part of the 'surge' plan is also going out and being more
active.
And that might be considered a "success" if it weren't for the
fact that May also saw in INCREASE in Iraqi civilian deaths.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/13/death-squad-killings-spike/
If we were to pull out all of our troops today, and suicide bombers
continued to kill Iraqi civilians...
Would you care about their deaths?
Would you want something done about it?
Or would you do like many liberals did prior to the war, and turn
their backs on them?-
How should we describe this last sentence? As a lie or as another
symptom of rightards' bigotry?
BTW, Iraq was stable before the USA invaded this country for no
reason.
So those hundreds of thousands of Iraqis that we discovered in mass
graves, is what you call stability.
I wonder how these liberals would like living in such a stable country?
According to these liberals...
mass killings
stealing
ignoring the U.N.
torturing atheletes
stoning people because they don't practice a religion
is stable living.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Yang, AthD h.c" |
|
| Title: Fred/Osprey Lie of the Day: Mass Grave With 100,000 Dead Iraqis! |
31 May 2007 09:38:49 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 May 2007 12:56:21 -0400, "Osprey" <NoNeedtoknow@mail.com>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvachon@gmail.com> wrote in message
How should we describe this last sentence? As a lie or as another
symptom of rightards' bigotry?
BTW, Iraq was stable before the USA invaded this country for no
reason.
So those hundreds of thousands of Iraqis that we discovered in mass graves,
is what you call stability.
Well played, Osprey. Take a 5,000-size mass grave, lie it up to be a
100,000-size mass grave, and use it as a justification for a war that
has killed 500,000 Iraqis and and created a million Iraqi refugees.
Talk about conservative compassion!
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1263901,00.html
Downing Street has admitted to The Observer that repeated claims by
Tony Blair that '400,000 bodies had been found in Iraqi mass graves'
is untrue, and only about 5,000 corpses have so far been uncovered.
--
Yang
a.a. #28
AthD (h.c.) conferred by the regents of the LCL
a.a. pastor #-273.15, the most frigid church of Celcius nee Kelvin
EAC Econometric Forecast and Sorcery Division
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -3 trillion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: 12.5 million FEWER jobs than Clinton and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -3474 GIs, one friend's co-worker's son and mounting
Having Bush ***** up my country: Worthless
newsgroups Yang promises not to revenge post
in response to Sound-of-Trumpet's *****:
rec.art.scifi.written
sci.archaeology
soc.history.what-if
.
|
|
|
| User: "osprey" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred/Osprey Lie of the Day: Mass Grave With 100,000 Dead Iraqis! |
31 May 2007 11:30:57 PM |
|
|
On May 31, 10:38 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 12:56:21 -0400, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvac...@gmail.com> wrote in message
How should we describe this last sentence? As a lie or as another
symptom of rightards' bigotry?
BTW, Iraq was stable before the USA invaded this country for no
reason.
So those hundreds of thousands of Iraqis that we discovered in mass graves,
is what you call stability.
Well played, Osprey. Take a 5,000-size mass grave, lie it up to be a
100,000-size mass grave, and use it as a justification for a war that
has killed 500,000 Iraqis and and created a million Iraqi refugees.
Talk about conservative compassion!
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1263901,00.html
Downing Street has admitted to The Observer that repeated claims by
Tony Blair that '400,000 bodies had been found in Iraqi mass graves'
is untrue, and only about 5,000 corpses have so far been uncovered.
WOW..
My name up on the subject line...
I want to thank all the little people for this honor and achievement..
If it were not for the little ones, like Yang..this honor would not be
possible.
I would also like to point out that Yang completely ignored the issue
and went straight for a personal attack, a typical liberal tactic. I
don't think I have ever seen a liberal who can handle sticking just to
the issue.
Still though...liberals seem to think that Iraq was stable..with
Thousands of bodies in mass graves
A ruler who tortured and killed athelets who didn't perform to his
liking
Treated women like slaves
Indoctrinated children
Allowed people to be killed for not practicing the Muslim religion
Stole billions of dollars from a program intended to feed the poor
Killed anyone who disagreed with him
Ruled by fear
Ignored numerous U.N. sanctions
That's stability??
Only in the mind of a liberal
.
|
|
|
| User: "james g. keegan jr." |
|
| Title: Re: Fred/Osprey Lie of the Day: Mass Grave With 100,000 Dead Iraqis! |
01 Jun 2007 03:35:30 PM |
|
|
In article <1180672257.170563.103080@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
osprey <noneedtoknow@mail.com> wrote:
WOW..
My name up on the subject line...
I want to thank all the little people for this honor and achievement..
If it were not for the little ones, like Yang..this honor would not be
possible.
don't be modest. you have been the abortion newsgroup's most prolific
liar for years now, posting several lies each day you posted.
you earned the disrespect you receive.
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Matt Silberstein" |
|
| Title: Re: Fred/Osprey Lie of the Day: Mass Grave With 100,000 Dead Iraqis! |
01 Jun 2007 09:55:39 AM |
|
|
On Thu, 31 May 2007 21:30:57 -0700, in alt.atheism , osprey
<noneedtoknow@mail.com> in
<1180672257.170563.103080@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> wrote:
On May 31, 10:38 pm, "Yang, AthD (h.c)" <eacmole@/*AWOLBUSH*/mail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 12:56:21 -0400, "Osprey" <NoNeedtok...@mail.com>
wrote:
"Parsifal" <jeanpascalvac...@gmail.com> wrote in message
How should we describe this last sentence? As a lie or as another
symptom of rightards' bigotry?
BTW, Iraq was stable before the USA invaded this country for no
reason.
So those hundreds of thousands of Iraqis that we discovered in mass graves,
is what you call stability.
Well played, Osprey. Take a 5,000-size mass grave, lie it up to be a
100,000-size mass grave, and use it as a justification for a war that
has killed 500,000 Iraqis and and created a million Iraqi refugees.
Talk about conservative compassion!
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1263901,00.html
Downing Street has admitted to The Observer that repeated claims by
Tony Blair that '400,000 bodies had been found in Iraqi mass graves'
is untrue, and only about 5,000 corpses have so far been uncovered.
WOW..
My name up on the subject line...
I want to thank all the little people for this honor and achievement..
If it were not for the little ones, like Yang..this honor would not be
possible.
I would also like to point out that Yang completely ignored the issue
and went straight for a personal attack, a typical liberal tactic.
I have not seen Fred Stone called a liberal, but YMMV.
I
don't think I have ever seen a liberal who can handle sticking just to
the issue.
And, yet, you attack "liberals" here rather than either the individual
or argument.
Still though...liberals seem to think that Iraq was stable..with
Thousands of bodies in mass graves
A ruler who tortured and killed athelets who didn't perform to his
liking
Treated women like slaves
Indoctrinated children
Allowed people to be killed for not practicing the Muslim religion
Stole billions of dollars from a program intended to feed the poor
Killed anyone who disagreed with him
Ruled by fear
Ignored numerous U.N. sanctions
That's stability??
A liberal like Ronald Reagan who supported Saddam as our ally while
Iraq did those things? Well, not all of those things: Iraq treated
women better than our current allies like Saudi or Kuwait or
Afghanistan or Pakistan.
--
Matt Silberstein
Do something today about the Darfur Genocide
http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org
"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
