Religions > Bible > UNquantifiable simultaneousness ALL together at once.
| Topic: |
Religions > Bible |
| User: |
"brian a m stuckless" |
| Date: |
19 Feb 2006 02:15:13 PM |
| Object: |
UNquantifiable simultaneousness ALL together at once. |
$$ ^.
$$ My isRAELis.
$$ THAT IAM before I was.
$$ What ABSOLUTE is SiMULTANEiTY is.
$$ ABSOLUTE SiMULTANEiTY is simply REAL TiME.
$$ [ABSOLUTE simultaneity is OBSERVABLE but NOT QUANTiFiABLE].
$$ Several GR observers (Max Born would specify his LiTTLE iMPs),
$$ are simultaneously OBSERViNG a train, speeding along the track
$$ from a MARK on the track at POiNT A. THEN, a GR observer fires
$$ off a SiGNAL which is recieved by a TRANSciever located on the
$$ BACK of the train, which NOW iMMEDiATELY re-LAYs the SiGNAL to
$$ another TRANSciever, located conveniently, at the FRONT of the
$$ train, which iMMEDiATELY FiREs a powerful ELECTRiC-arc MARKiNG
$$ the track at POiNT B. Assuming that VELOCiTY and LENGTH of the
$$ train REMAiN UNchanged ..SHOW (exhibit) the length A->B, each.
$$
$$ Next, REPEAT, by SiMiLARLY triggering an olive and cannon-ball
$$ to iNSTANTLY, AUTOMATiCALLY start to SiMULTANEOUSLY fall, from
$$ from the TOP of the LEANiNG TOWER of PiZA, TOGETHER ..at once.
$$
$$ These are OBSERVERs OBSERViNG iMMEASURABLE SiMULTANEOUSNESS.!!
$$ [snicker] ```Brian.
Tom Roberts wrote: > > Doune wrote: > > Tom Wrote:
The only observable definition of "time" that anyone has come up
with is: Time is what clocks measure. This, of course, requires an
operational definition of "clock".
That's not quite true, we did have a concept of time before the
invention of clocks. It's simply the succession of events - mankind
must have had a notional concept of the second law of thermodynamics,
and therefore the arrow of time, long before he could write.
This is not observable, except inside your own head. Solipsism is not
science.
But I see I should have said: observable and quantifiable.
Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts
Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality).
Re: UNquantifiable simultaneousness ALL together at once.
.
|
|
| User: "brian a m stuckless" |
|
| Title: Re: UNquantifiable simultaneousness ALL together at once. |
19 Feb 2006 03:17:23 PM |
|
|
$$ ^.
$$ My isRAELis.
$$ THAT IAM before I was.
$$ What ABSOLUTE is SiMULTANEiTY is.
$$ ABSOLUTE SiMULTANEiTY is simply REAL TiME.
$$ [ABSOLUTE simultaneity is OBSERVABLE but NOT QUANTiFiABLE].
$$ Several GR observers (Max Born would specify his LiTTLE iMPs),
$$ are simultaneously OBSERViNG a train, speeding along the track
$$ from a MARK on the track at POiNT A. THEN, a GR observer fires
$$ off a SiGNAL which is recieved by a TRANSciever located on the
$$ BACK of the train, which NOW iMMEDiATELY re-LAYs the SiGNAL to
$$ another TRANSciever, located conveniently, at the FRONT of the
$$ train, which iMMEDiATELY FiREs a powerful ELECTRiC-arc MARKiNG
$$ the track at POiNT B. Assuming that VELOCiTY and LENGTH of the
$$ train REMAiN UNchanged ..SHOW (exhibit) the length A->B, each.
$$
$$ Next, REPEAT, by SiMiLARLY triggering an olive and cannon-ball
$$ to iNSTANTLY, AUTOMATiCALLY start to SiMULTANEOUSLY fall, from
$$ from the TOP of the LEANiNG TOWER of PiZA, TOGETHER ..at once.
$$
$$ These are OBSERVERs OBSERViNG iMMEASURABLE SiMULTANEOUSNESS.!!
$$ [snicker] ```Brian.
Tom Roberts wrote: > > Doune wrote: > > Tom Wrote:
The only observable definition of "time" that anyone has come up
with is: Time is what clocks measure. This, of course, requires an
operational definition of "clock".
That's not quite true, we did have a concept of time before the
invention of clocks. It's simply the succession of events - mankind
must have had a notional concept of the second law of thermodynamics,
and therefore the arrow of time, long before he could write.
This is not observable, except inside your own head. Solipsism is not
science.
But I see I should have said: observable and quantifiable.
Tom [He between his error-bars] Roberts
Re: Anti-Relativistists Main Points (Einstein Abstraction or Reality).
Re: UNquantifiable simultaneousness ALL together at once.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Switch, MD/PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: UNquantifiable simultaneousness ALL together at once. |
19 Feb 2006 02:51:55 PM |
|
|
brian a m stuckless wrote:
$$ ^.
here is simultaneousness for you
while i was reading this I thought
this guy don't know ***** from shinola!
it's funny! I wasthinking that at the same time I was reading your post
Come back after you stop getting too high
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Once for all time He
Re: I Was a Lesbian Once, So I Should Know...!
It is time for Michael Christ to leave you once again for a time.
why doesn't the A,LL-POWERFUL JACKASS christian god get off of his FAT, LAZY ***** and help people for ONCE in his HORSESHIT existence?
Once more, clearer this time, I hope
Once bitten twice shy
Exactly what an " Atheist " really is... the word " atheist " is found but once in the Bible... Eph. 2:12
Re: Once saved always saved?
| Flip Flops - Once used to be sandals but now are changes of view
Re: Poster Child for Bad Conversions WAS: Once a Shiksa, Always a Shiksa...
Re: Once a year, we celebrate fathers. Maybe you are one.
Re: Once saved always saved?
once again, the peaceful religion
Baptism, More Than Once?
Re: I Was a Lesbian Once, So I Should Know...!
|
|
|
