| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"Rosena" |
| Date: |
31 May 2006 12:52:48 PM |
| Object: |
@ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
Rosena
.
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 01:05:57 PM |
|
|
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
Rosena
who says men do this ,
and who says women don't do this
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 02:58:13 PM |
|
|
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
Rosena
Whatever a man has done in a mutually consenting sexual past is of no
concern to me. I have dated several bisexual men. If you are talking about
a threesome, involving one woman and two men, that's one thing, but if you
are talking about a relationship with a bisexual man who has had one on one
intimate relationships with men; no woman present, that's another thing.
There's a big difference between the two situations. Most of the women I
have discussed this with, are turned off by the idea of a man having had a
relationship with a man. I suspect, given what I have been told, these
women don't entirely trust that a man can be truly and equally attracted to
both genders. In other words, he is either gay and in denial, or gay and
experimenting, but bottom line, he is more gay than heterosexual, which
pretty much leaves them out in the cold at some point. There is also a
school of thought that a man is only as faithful as his options, and double
the options, less likely the commitment. I understand the mindset, but
don't buy into any of it myself. Relationships are about *people*
regardless of orientation or past history. I would much rather deal with
each man as unique and individual person, separate from, and much more than
just his sexuality.
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 02:18:45 PM |
|
|
"Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:MHlfg.1143$Su3.102941@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
Rosena
Whatever a man has done in a mutually consenting sexual past is of no
concern to me. I have dated several bisexual men. If you are talking
about
a threesome, involving one woman and two men, that's one thing, but if you
are talking about a relationship with a bisexual man who has had one on
one
intimate relationships with men; no woman present, that's another thing.
There's a big difference between the two situations. Most of the women I
have discussed this with, are turned off by the idea of a man having had a
relationship with a man. I suspect, given what I have been told, these
women don't entirely trust that a man can be truly and equally attracted
to
both genders. In other words, he is either gay and in denial, or gay and
experimenting, but bottom line, he is more gay than heterosexual, which
pretty much leaves them out in the cold at some point. There is also a
school of thought that a man is only as faithful as his options, and
double
the options, less likely the commitment. I understand the mindset, but
don't buy into any of it myself. Relationships are about *people*
regardless of orientation or past history. I would much rather deal with
each man as unique and individual person, separate from, and much more
than
just his sexuality.
--
Rhi
Smelling like a brewery,
looking like a tramp
I ain't got a quarter
got a postage stamp
Been five o'clock shadow boxing
all around the town
Talking with the old men
sleeping on the ground
Bazanti bootin
al zootin al hoot
and Al Cohn
sharin this apartment
with a telephone pole
and it's a fish-net stockings
spike-heel shoes
Strip tease, ***** tease
car kease blues
and the porno floor show
live nude girls
dreamy and creamy
and the brunette curls
Chesty Morgan and a
Watermelon Rose
raise my rent and take off
all your clothes
with the trench coats
magazines bottle full of rum
she's so good, it make
a dead man *****, with
pasties and a g-string
beer and a shot
Portland through a shot glass
and a Buffalo squeeze
wrinkles and cherry
and twinky and pinky
and FeFe live from Gay Paree
fanfares rim shots
back stage who cares
all this hot burlesque for me
cleavage, cleavage thighs and hips
from the nape of her neck
to the lip stick lips
chopped and channeled
and lowered and louvered
and a cheater slicks
and baby moons
she's hot and ready
and creamy and sugared
and the band is awful
and so are the tunes
crawlin on her belly shakin like jelly
and I'm getting harder than
Chinese algebraziers and cheers
from the compendium here
hey sweet heart they're yellin for more
squashing out your cigarette butts
on the floor
and I like Shelly
you like Jane
what was the girl with the snake skins name
it's an early bird matinee
come back any day
getcha little sompin
that cha can't get at home
getcha little sompin
that cha can't get at home
pasties and a g-string
beer and a shot
Portland through a shot glass
and a Buffalo squeeze
popcorn, front row
higher than a kite
and I'll be back tomorrow night
and I'll be back tomorrow night
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 04:28:14 PM |
|
|
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9tudnXcEbv6IceDZRVn-jg@giganews.com...
Smelling like a brewery,
looking like a tramp
I ain't got a quarter
got a postage stamp
Been five o'clock shadow boxing
all around the town
Talking with the old men
sleeping on the ground
Bazanti bootin
al zootin al hoot
and Al Cohn
sharin this apartment
with a telephone pole
and it's a fish-net stockings
spike-heel shoes
Strip tease, ***** tease
car kease blues
and the porno floor show
live nude girls
dreamy and creamy
and the brunette curls
Chesty Morgan and a
Watermelon Rose
raise my rent and take off
all your clothes
with the trench coats
magazines bottle full of rum
she's so good, it make
a dead man *****, with
pasties and a g-string
beer and a shot
Portland through a shot glass
and a Buffalo squeeze
wrinkles and cherry
and twinky and pinky
and FeFe live from Gay Paree
fanfares rim shots
back stage who cares
all this hot burlesque for me
cleavage, cleavage thighs and hips
from the nape of her neck
to the lip stick lips
chopped and channeled
and lowered and louvered
and a cheater slicks
and baby moons
she's hot and ready
and creamy and sugared
and the band is awful
and so are the tunes
crawlin on her belly shakin like jelly
and I'm getting harder than
Chinese algebraziers and cheers
from the compendium here
hey sweet heart they're yellin for more
squashing out your cigarette butts
on the floor
and I like Shelly
you like Jane
what was the girl with the snake skins name
it's an early bird matinee
come back any day
getcha little sompin
that cha can't get at home
getcha little sompin
that cha can't get at home
pasties and a g-string
beer and a shot
Portland through a shot glass
and a Buffalo squeeze
popcorn, front row
higher than a kite
and I'll be back tomorrow night
and I'll be back tomorrow night
Ooooh...I like it! Who sings it? I'll download.
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 03:48:04 PM |
|
|
"Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:90nfg.1269$Su3.103617@news20.bellglobal.com...
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9tudnXcEbv6IceDZRVn-jg@giganews.com...
Smelling like a brewery,
looking like a tramp
I ain't got a quarter
got a postage stamp
Been five o'clock shadow boxing
all around the town
Talking with the old men
sleeping on the ground
Bazanti bootin
al zootin al hoot
and Al Cohn
sharin this apartment
with a telephone pole
and it's a fish-net stockings
spike-heel shoes
Strip tease, ***** tease
car kease blues
and the porno floor show
live nude girls
dreamy and creamy
and the brunette curls
Chesty Morgan and a
Watermelon Rose
raise my rent and take off
all your clothes
with the trench coats
magazines bottle full of rum
she's so good, it make
a dead man *****, with
pasties and a g-string
beer and a shot
Portland through a shot glass
and a Buffalo squeeze
wrinkles and cherry
and twinky and pinky
and FeFe live from Gay Paree
fanfares rim shots
back stage who cares
all this hot burlesque for me
cleavage, cleavage thighs and hips
from the nape of her neck
to the lip stick lips
chopped and channeled
and lowered and louvered
and a cheater slicks
and baby moons
she's hot and ready
and creamy and sugared
and the band is awful
and so are the tunes
crawlin on her belly shakin like jelly
and I'm getting harder than
Chinese algebraziers and cheers
from the compendium here
hey sweet heart they're yellin for more
squashing out your cigarette butts
on the floor
and I like Shelly
you like Jane
what was the girl with the snake skins name
it's an early bird matinee
come back any day
getcha little sompin
that cha can't get at home
getcha little sompin
that cha can't get at home
pasties and a g-string
beer and a shot
Portland through a shot glass
and a Buffalo squeeze
popcorn, front row
higher than a kite
and I'll be back tomorrow night
and I'll be back tomorrow night
Ooooh...I like it! Who sings it? I'll download.
--
Rhi
i e-mailed the info
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 04:38:01 PM |
|
|
Rhiannon wrote:
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
Rosena
Whatever a man has done in a mutually consenting sexual past is of no
concern to me. I have dated several bisexual men. If you are talking about
a threesome, involving one woman and two men, that's one thing, but if you
are talking about a relationship with a bisexual man who has had one on one
intimate relationships with men; no woman present, that's another thing.
There's a big difference between the two situations. Most of the women I
have discussed this with, are turned off by the idea of a man having had a
relationship with a man. I suspect, given what I have been told, these
women don't entirely trust that a man can be truly and equally attracted to
both genders. In other words, he is either gay and in denial, or gay and
experimenting, but bottom line, he is more gay than heterosexual, which
pretty much leaves them out in the cold at some point. There is also a
school of thought that a man is only as faithful as his options, and double
the options, less likely the commitment. I understand the mindset, but
don't buy into any of it myself. Relationships are about *people*
regardless of orientation or past history. I would much rather deal with
each man as unique and individual person, separate from, and much more than
just his sexuality.
--
Rhi
I think Rhi hit it on the nail with this one. I don't know why all my
straight male friends can't get enough of watching two women...no, not
that my friends really into porn but when they watch or talk about it
that's what they like. I've wondered why women don't like the same
thing...but with two guys. Anyway, kind of odd subject but I think
your answer was right on...makes perfect sense. I hate to say it...but
when I meet a guy who says he is Bi it usually turns out in the near
future that he wasn't ready to come all the way out as being gay. I'm
not saying Bi doesn't exist...but that has been my experience.
.
|
|
|
| User: "cal" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 05:35:36 PM |
|
|
Chris wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
Rosena
Whatever a man has done in a mutually consenting sexual past is of no
concern to me. I have dated several bisexual men. If you are talking about
a threesome, involving one woman and two men, that's one thing, but if you
are talking about a relationship with a bisexual man who has had one on one
intimate relationships with men; no woman present, that's another thing.
There's a big difference between the two situations. Most of the women I
have discussed this with, are turned off by the idea of a man having had a
relationship with a man. I suspect, given what I have been told, these
women don't entirely trust that a man can be truly and equally attracted to
both genders. In other words, he is either gay and in denial, or gay and
experimenting, but bottom line, he is more gay than heterosexual, which
pretty much leaves them out in the cold at some point. There is also a
school of thought that a man is only as faithful as his options, and double
the options, less likely the commitment. I understand the mindset, but
don't buy into any of it myself. Relationships are about *people*
regardless of orientation or past history. I would much rather deal with
each man as unique and individual person, separate from, and much more than
just his sexuality.
--
Rhi
I think Rhi hit it on the nail with this one. I don't know why all my
straight male friends can't get enough of watching two women...no, not
that my friends really into porn but when they watch or talk about it
that's what they like. I've wondered why women don't like the same
thing...but with two guys. Anyway, kind of odd subject but I think
your answer was right on...makes perfect sense. I hate to say it...but
when I meet a guy who says he is Bi it usually turns out in the near
future that he wasn't ready to come all the way out as being gay. I'm
not saying Bi doesn't exist...but that has been my experience.
more likely to be true with young people at the start of their sexual
lives than with older people. generally, sexual identity settles in for
keeps by our mid-twenties. people who say they're bi past that age are
probably going to be bi. before that, it's a crap shoot. some kids who
identify as bi or even gay in high school turn out to be straight as an
arrow a few years later. does that mean they've gone into the closet
and are now repressed homosexuals? nope, not necessarily at all.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 05:38:04 PM |
|
|
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149114936.862033.225280@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Chris wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together??
Never
understood the dynamic.
Rosena
Whatever a man has done in a mutually consenting sexual past is of no
concern to me. I have dated several bisexual men. If you are talking
about
a threesome, involving one woman and two men, that's one thing, but if
you
are talking about a relationship with a bisexual man who has had one
on one
intimate relationships with men; no woman present, that's another
thing.
There's a big difference between the two situations. Most of the
women I
have discussed this with, are turned off by the idea of a man having
had a
relationship with a man. I suspect, given what I have been told,
these
women don't entirely trust that a man can be truly and equally
attracted to
both genders. In other words, he is either gay and in denial, or gay
and
experimenting, but bottom line, he is more gay than heterosexual,
which
pretty much leaves them out in the cold at some point. There is also
a
school of thought that a man is only as faithful as his options, and
double
the options, less likely the commitment. I understand the mindset,
but
don't buy into any of it myself. Relationships are about *people*
regardless of orientation or past history. I would much rather deal
with
each man as unique and individual person, separate from, and much more
than
just his sexuality.
--
Rhi
I think Rhi hit it on the nail with this one. I don't know why all my
straight male friends can't get enough of watching two women...no, not
that my friends really into porn but when they watch or talk about it
that's what they like. I've wondered why women don't like the same
thing...but with two guys. Anyway, kind of odd subject but I think
your answer was right on...makes perfect sense. I hate to say it...but
when I meet a guy who says he is Bi it usually turns out in the near
future that he wasn't ready to come all the way out as being gay. I'm
not saying Bi doesn't exist...but that has been my experience.
more likely to be true with young people at the start of their sexual
lives than with older people. generally, sexual identity settles in for
keeps by our mid-twenties. people who say they're bi past that age are
probably going to be bi. before that, it's a crap shoot. some kids who
identify as bi or even gay in high school turn out to be straight as an
arrow a few years later. does that mean they've gone into the closet
and are now repressed homosexuals? nope, not necessarily at all.
good to see you come out
.
|
|
|
| User: "cal" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 05:54:40 PM |
|
|
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1vqdnWclo4VQh-PZRVn-rA@giganews.com...
good to see you come out
heh, you wish.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 05:56:29 PM |
|
|
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5l6ln$t5u$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1vqdnWclo4VQh-PZRVn-rA@giganews.com...
good to see you come out
heh, you wish.
doesn't make no nevermind to me ,
i just think it will be good for your own self image
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "used2be" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 04:42:22 PM |
|
|
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
because men are visual creatures and mostly just interested in the act of
sex itself. not the emotions involved. they don't care if the women really
like each other or not...they just wanna see lots of breasts, erotic
behavior and nudity. women, otoh, are emotionally involved in sex. it's a
bit difficult to get emotionally involved in watching 2 men get it on.
just my humble opinion...
.
|
|
|
| User: "cal" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
31 May 2006 05:06:06 PM |
|
|
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:25ofg.3034$0v4.1093@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
because men are visual creatures and mostly just interested in the act of
sex itself. not the emotions involved. they don't care if the women
really like each other or not...they just wanna see lots of breasts,
erotic behavior and nudity. women, otoh, are emotionally involved in sex.
it's a bit difficult to get emotionally involved in watching 2 men get it
on.
just my humble opinion...
BWAHAH! this is hilarious. you really had me going there, with
the deadpan delivery.
.
|
|
|
| User: "used2be" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 03:14:31 PM |
|
|
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5l3qm$5i4$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:25ofg.3034$0v4.1093@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
because men are visual creatures and mostly just interested in the act of
sex itself. not the emotions involved. they don't care if the women
really like each other or not...they just wanna see lots of breasts,
erotic behavior and nudity. women, otoh, are emotionally involved in
sex.
it's a bit difficult to get emotionally involved in watching 2 men get it
on.
just my humble opinion...
BWAHAH! this is hilarious. you really had me going there, with
the deadpan delivery.
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual men.
sorry if it made you feel bad. most men that i know will admit it's true
and they sure don't feel guilty about it. it just is what it is.
.
|
|
|
| User: "gravity" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 05:50:56 PM |
|
|
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5l3qm$5i4$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:25ofg.3034$0v4.1093@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
because men are visual creatures and mostly just interested in the act
of
sex itself. not the emotions involved. they don't care if the women
really like each other or not...they just wanna see lots of breasts,
erotic behavior and nudity. women, otoh, are emotionally involved in
sex.
it's a bit difficult to get emotionally involved in watching 2 men get
it
on.
just my humble opinion...
BWAHAH! this is hilarious. you really had me going there, with
the deadpan delivery.
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual men.
sorry if it made you feel bad. most men that i know will admit it's true
and they sure don't feel guilty about it. it just is what it is.
i have very little interest in seeing lesbians (maybe i'm whacked). seeing
bisexuals is different.
Gravity
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 09:19:00 PM |
|
|
"gravity" <gravityzrainbow@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:447f702f$0$15765$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5l3qm$5i4$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:25ofg.3034$0v4.1093@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together??
Never
understood the dynamic.
because men are visual creatures and mostly just interested in the
act
of
sex itself. not the emotions involved. they don't care if the women
really like each other or not...they just wanna see lots of breasts,
erotic behavior and nudity. women, otoh, are emotionally involved in
sex.
it's a bit difficult to get emotionally involved in watching 2 men
get
it
on.
just my humble opinion...
BWAHAH! this is hilarious. you really had me going there, with
the deadpan delivery.
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i
said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual men.
sorry if it made you feel bad. most men that i know will admit it's
true
and they sure don't feel guilty about it. it just is what it is.
i have very little interest in seeing lesbians (maybe i'm whacked).
seeing
bisexuals is different.
Gravity
Never mind wasting time with porn. Just watch Sunday night football.
Mostly gorgeous men in tight pants, piling on top of other men in tight
pants, slapping each other on the butt, and all in the pursuit of a ball
that's shaped like a testicle. Now that's homoerotic. :)
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 08:40:58 PM |
|
|
"Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:RmMfg.3152$EF1.241124@news20.bellglobal.com...
"gravity" <gravityzrainbow@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:447f702f$0$15765$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5l3qm$5i4$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:25ofg.3034$0v4.1093@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved
with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together??
Never
understood the dynamic.
because men are visual creatures and mostly just interested in the
act
of
sex itself. not the emotions involved. they don't care if the
women
really like each other or not...they just wanna see lots of
breasts,
erotic behavior and nudity. women, otoh, are emotionally involved
in
sex.
it's a bit difficult to get emotionally involved in watching 2 men
get
it
on.
just my humble opinion...
BWAHAH! this is hilarious. you really had me going there, with
the deadpan delivery.
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i
said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual
men.
sorry if it made you feel bad. most men that i know will admit it's
true
and they sure don't feel guilty about it. it just is what it is.
i have very little interest in seeing lesbians (maybe i'm whacked).
seeing
bisexuals is different.
Gravity
Never mind wasting time with porn. Just watch Sunday night football.
Mostly gorgeous men in tight pants, piling on top of other men in tight
pants, slapping each other on the butt, and all in the pursuit of a ball
that's shaped like a testicle. Now that's homoerotic. :)
--
Rhi
women's hockey , but there is sync swims and the ever pop , tennis ,
my serve , oh , was that an ace , tee hee hee
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Luna" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 07:44:00 PM |
|
|
gravity wrote:
<snip>
i have very little interest in seeing lesbians (maybe i'm whacked). seeing
bisexuals is different.
That's a good point - what's usually the fantasy is gorgeous straight
girls performing. You just know that what those girls really need and
want is...
Jean
Gravity
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 09:15:51 PM |
|
|
"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149209040.393848.282250@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
gravity wrote:
<snip>
i have very little interest in seeing lesbians (maybe i'm whacked).
seeing
bisexuals is different.
That's a good point - what's usually the fantasy is gorgeous straight
girls performing. You just know that what those girls really need and
want is...
Jean
Panty liners with wings that stay stuck for a little longer than a cheap
bandaide?
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 08:34:24 PM |
|
|
"Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:UjMfg.3147$EF1.240722@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149209040.393848.282250@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
gravity wrote:
<snip>
i have very little interest in seeing lesbians (maybe i'm whacked).
seeing
bisexuals is different.
That's a good point - what's usually the fantasy is gorgeous straight
girls performing. You just know that what those girls really need and
want is...
Jean
Panty liners with wings that stay stuck for a little longer than a cheap
bandaide?
--
Rhi
oh , i so wanna say
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
02 Jun 2006 12:52:24 AM |
|
|
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:HbSdnREKt8UyCOLZ4p2dnA@giganews.com...
"Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:UjMfg.3147$EF1.240722@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149209040.393848.282250@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
gravity wrote:
<snip>
i have very little interest in seeing lesbians (maybe i'm whacked).
seeing
bisexuals is different.
That's a good point - what's usually the fantasy is gorgeous straight
girls performing. You just know that what those girls really need and
want is...
Jean
Panty liners with wings that stay stuck for a little longer than a cheap
bandaide?
--
Rhi
oh , i so wanna say
eeeewwwww
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "used2be" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 09:29:10 PM |
|
|
"Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:UjMfg.3147$EF1.240722@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149209040.393848.282250@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
gravity wrote:
<snip>
i have very little interest in seeing lesbians (maybe i'm whacked).
seeing
bisexuals is different.
That's a good point - what's usually the fantasy is gorgeous straight
girls performing. You just know that what those girls really need and
want is...
Jean
Panty liners with wings that stay stuck for a little longer than a cheap
bandaide?
oh girl, that's just SO WRONG!!!!
:)))))
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
02 Jun 2006 12:52:56 AM |
|
|
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:WnNfg.2963$bk5.641@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:UjMfg.3147$EF1.240722@news20.bellglobal.com...
"Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149209040.393848.282250@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
gravity wrote:
<snip>
i have very little interest in seeing lesbians (maybe i'm whacked).
seeing
bisexuals is different.
That's a good point - what's usually the fantasy is gorgeous straight
girls performing. You just know that what those girls really need and
want is...
Jean
Panty liners with wings that stay stuck for a little longer than a cheap
bandaide?
oh girl, that's just SO WRONG!!!!
:)))))
LOL!
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 06:01:37 PM |
|
|
hi
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 03:52:09 PM |
|
|
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5l3qm$5i4$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:25ofg.3034$0v4.1093@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together?? Never
understood the dynamic.
because men are visual creatures and mostly just interested in the act
of
sex itself. not the emotions involved. they don't care if the women
really like each other or not...they just wanna see lots of breasts,
erotic behavior and nudity. women, otoh, are emotionally involved in
sex.
it's a bit difficult to get emotionally involved in watching 2 men get
it
on.
just my humble opinion...
BWAHAH! this is hilarious. you really had me going there, with
the deadpan delivery.
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual men.
sorry if it made you feel bad. most men that i know will admit it's true
and they sure don't feel guilty about it. it just is what it is.
so all the females here except one or two , send me photos
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 09:05:43 PM |
|
|
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:h-qdnfncfKLizuLZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5l3qm$5i4$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:25ofg.3034$0v4.1093@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together??
Never
understood the dynamic.
because men are visual creatures and mostly just interested in the
act
of
sex itself. not the emotions involved. they don't care if the women
really like each other or not...they just wanna see lots of breasts,
erotic behavior and nudity. women, otoh, are emotionally involved in
sex.
it's a bit difficult to get emotionally involved in watching 2 men
get
it
on.
just my humble opinion...
BWAHAH! this is hilarious. you really had me going there, with
the deadpan delivery.
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i
said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual men.
sorry if it made you feel bad. most men that i know will admit it's
true
and they sure don't feel guilty about it. it just is what it is.
so all the females here except one or two , send me photos
Lalalalala...hi :)
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 08:31:26 PM |
|
|
"Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:naMfg.3139$EF1.240848@news20.bellglobal.com...
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:h-qdnfncfKLizuLZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@giganews.com...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5l3qm$5i4$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:25ofg.3034$0v4.1093@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"Rosena" <filpriros@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1149097968.005893.282310@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Why do men always want to see two women together or be involved
with
two women, and women do not want to think of two men together??
Never
understood the dynamic.
because men are visual creatures and mostly just interested in the
act
of
sex itself. not the emotions involved. they don't care if the
women
really like each other or not...they just wanna see lots of
breasts,
erotic behavior and nudity. women, otoh, are emotionally involved
in
sex.
it's a bit difficult to get emotionally involved in watching 2 men
get
it
on.
just my humble opinion...
BWAHAH! this is hilarious. you really had me going there, with
the deadpan delivery.
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i
said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual
men.
sorry if it made you feel bad. most men that i know will admit it's
true
and they sure don't feel guilty about it. it just is what it is.
so all the females here except one or two , send me photos
Lalalalala...hi :)
--
Rhi
no , wait , i get to say how to sit
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cal" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 04:30:41 PM |
|
|
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual men.
i don't think that really enters into it. it's not a function of men's
sexuality, but of their emotional intelligence and culturally conditioned
privileges and expectations. and, not insignificantly, women's conditioned
expectations, what they want, what they're told reality is, what they're
willing to put up with. but there's nothing new about this. you've been
hearing it for decades. you've probably said it yourself. in the end it
turns back on you as inevitably as biological programming. but that's not
what it is.
sorry if it made you feel bad. most men that i know will admit it's true
and they sure don't feel guilty about it. it just is what it is.
well, ***** that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 04:40:38 PM |
|
|
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5nm45$djj$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual men.
i don't think that really enters into it. it's not a function of men's
sexuality, but of their emotional intelligence and culturally conditioned
privileges and expectations. and, not insignificantly, women's conditioned
expectations, what they want, what they're told reality is, what they're
willing to put up with. but there's nothing new about this. you've been
hearing it for decades. you've probably said it yourself. in the end it
turns back on you as inevitably as biological programming. but that's not
what it is.
sorry if it made you feel bad. most men that i know will admit it's
true
and they sure don't feel guilty about it. it just is what it is.
well, ***** that.
thank you for coming out
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "used2be" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 05:31:40 PM |
|
|
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5nm45$djj$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual men.
i don't think that really enters into it. it's not a function of men's
sexuality, but of their emotional intelligence and culturally conditioned
privileges and expectations.
well, i guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: @ In Line with Recent Questions @ |
01 Jun 2006 05:35:30 PM |
|
|
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:gVJfg.2926$bk5.366@tornado.texas.rr.com...
"cal" <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5nm45$djj$1@nntp.aioe.org...
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:HUHfg.2903$bk5.1720@tornado.texas.rr.com...
i was talking about strictly heterosexual men. and obviously what i
said
can't be true of all men, but it is generally true of heterosexual men.
i don't think that really enters into it. it's not a function of men's
sexuality, but of their emotional intelligence and culturally
conditioned
privileges and expectations.
well, i guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.
finally , now be quite and show me that pic again
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
