Britney



 Sociology > Depression > Britney

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 2 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 
Topic: Sociology > Depression
User: "Luna"
Date: 04 Jan 2008 12:56:38 PM
Object: Britney
This is sad:
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/01_01/britney2RETNA0401_1000x730.jpg
.

User: "CyberDroog"

Title: Re: Britney 04 Jan 2008 06:02:01 PM
On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:56:38 GMT, "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:

This is sad:

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/01_01/britney2RETNA0401_1000x730.jpg

I don't care for Britney's music or her voice, but I really hope she gets
some help. It's a crime to have someone's personal problems laid out in the
media like that.
The residual income from her net worth is something like $750,000 per
month. If I had that kind of money, I'd pay body guards $100,000 per year
and charge them with restraining me against my will if they agreed that I
was flipping out.
--
REFORM, v. A thing that mostly satisfies reformers opposed to
reformation.
- Ambrose Bierce
.
User: "Luna"

Title: Re: Britney 04 Jan 2008 06:44:40 PM
"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message
news:dvhtn3dvqs5v7388njp7cfp9d03v5pdsqt@news.easynews.com...

On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:56:38 GMT, "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:

This is sad:

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/01_01/britney2RETNA0401_1000x730.jpg


I don't care for Britney's music or her voice, but I really hope she gets
some help. It's a crime to have someone's personal problems laid out in
the
media like that.

The residual income from her net worth is something like $750,000 per
month. If I had that kind of money, I'd pay body guards $100,000 per year
and charge them with restraining me against my will if they agreed that I
was flipping out.

I think the first thing I'd do if I were her is get out of LA. Go live in
Missouri or something.
One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way was that
when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being loaded into the
ambulance she tried to open her legs - the paramedics had to stop her.
She's pretty much submitted to the idea that she's meat fodder. Of course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't crack 90 is
going to make things awfully tough for her.
Jean



--
REFORM, v. A thing that mostly satisfies reformers opposed to
reformation.

- Ambrose Bierce

.
User: "Alan Harding"

Title: Re: Britney 04 Jan 2008 07:24:32 PM
In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna <lunajean@gmail.com>
writes


One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way was that
when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being loaded into the
ambulance she tried to open her legs - the paramedics had to stop her.
She's pretty much submitted to the idea that she's meat fodder. Of course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't crack 90 is
going to make things awfully tough for her.

I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like to
have an IQ like that.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
User: "Luna"

Title: Re: Britney 04 Jan 2008 10:33:30 PM
"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4nWrqfiQxtfHFwrY@harding.demon.co.uk...

In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna <lunajean@gmail.com>
writes


One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way was that
when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being loaded into the
ambulance she tried to open her legs - the paramedics had to stop her.
She's pretty much submitted to the idea that she's meat fodder. Of
course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't crack 90 is
going to make things awfully tough for her.


I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like to have
an IQ like that.

I think it might make it tougher to access the tools you need to be better,
but that's pure opinion.
Jean


--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?

.
User: "Alan Harding"

Title: Re: Britney 06 Jan 2008 05:34:40 AM
In message <uMDfj.6464$EA5.5081@pd7urf2no>, Luna <lunajean@gmail.com>
writes

"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4nWrqfiQxtfHFwrY@harding.demon.co.uk...

In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna <lunajean@gmail.com>
writes


One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way was that
when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being loaded into the
ambulance she tried to open her legs - the paramedics had to stop her.
She's pretty much submitted to the idea that she's meat fodder. Of
course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't crack 90 is
going to make things awfully tough for her.


I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like to have
an IQ like that.


I think it might make it tougher to access the tools you need to be better,
but that's pure opinion.

I think you're probably right. I can't put myself in their shoes,
though.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: Britney 06 Jan 2008 09:38:48 AM
Alan Harding wrote:

In message <uMDfj.6464$EA5.5081@pd7urf2no>, Luna <lunajean@gmail.com>
writes

"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4nWrqfiQxtfHFwrY@harding.demon.co.uk...

In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna
<lunajean@gmail.com> writes


One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way
was that when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being
loaded into the ambulance she tried to open her legs - the
paramedics had to stop her. She's pretty much submitted to the
idea that she's meat fodder. Of course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't
crack 90 is going to make things awfully tough for her.


I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like
to have an IQ like that.


I think it might make it tougher to access the tools you need to be
better, but that's pure opinion.


I think you're probably right. I can't put myself in their shoes,
though.

only because you have fat feet
.
User: "Alan Harding"

Title: Re: Britney 06 Jan 2008 01:37:39 PM
In message <hYydnSn_danBax3anZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@giganews.com>, %
<persent@gmail.com> writes

Alan Harding wrote:

In message <uMDfj.6464$EA5.5081@pd7urf2no>, Luna <lunajean@gmail.com>
writes

"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4nWrqfiQxtfHFwrY@harding.demon.co.uk...

In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna
<lunajean@gmail.com> writes


One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way
was that when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being
loaded into the ambulance she tried to open her legs - the
paramedics had to stop her. She's pretty much submitted to the
idea that she's meat fodder. Of course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't
crack 90 is going to make things awfully tough for her.


I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like
to have an IQ like that.


I think it might make it tougher to access the tools you need to be
better, but that's pure opinion.


I think you're probably right. I can't put myself in their shoes,
though.


only because you have fat feet

Broad, bony feet.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: Britney 06 Jan 2008 05:30:59 PM
Alan Harding wrote:

In message <hYydnSn_danBax3anZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@giganews.com>, %
<persent@gmail.com> writes

Alan Harding wrote:

In message <uMDfj.6464$EA5.5081@pd7urf2no>, Luna
<lunajean@gmail.com> writes

"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4nWrqfiQxtfHFwrY@harding.demon.co.uk...

In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna
<lunajean@gmail.com> writes


One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way
was that when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being
loaded into the ambulance she tried to open her legs - the
paramedics had to stop her. She's pretty much submitted to the
idea that she's meat fodder. Of course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't
crack 90 is going to make things awfully tough for her.


I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like
to have an IQ like that.


I think it might make it tougher to access the tools you need to be
better, but that's pure opinion.


I think you're probably right. I can't put myself in their shoes,
though.


only because you have fat feet


Broad, bony feet.

duck feet
.
User: "Alan Harding"

Title: Re: Britney 07 Jan 2008 02:47:28 AM
In message <j7-dnXqbxtyb-BzanZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@giganews.com>, %
<persent@gmail.com> writes

Alan Harding wrote:

In message <hYydnSn_danBax3anZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@giganews.com>, %
<persent@gmail.com> writes

Alan Harding wrote:

In message <uMDfj.6464$EA5.5081@pd7urf2no>, Luna
<lunajean@gmail.com> writes

"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4nWrqfiQxtfHFwrY@harding.demon.co.uk...

In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna
<lunajean@gmail.com> writes


One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way
was that when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being
loaded into the ambulance she tried to open her legs - the
paramedics had to stop her. She's pretty much submitted to the
idea that she's meat fodder. Of course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't
crack 90 is going to make things awfully tough for her.


I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like
to have an IQ like that.


I think it might make it tougher to access the tools you need to be
better, but that's pure opinion.


I think you're probably right. I can't put myself in their shoes,
though.


only because you have fat feet


Broad, bony feet.


duck feet

At least I'm not pigeon-toed.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.






User: "CyberDroog"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 01:36:07 AM
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 01:24:32 +0000, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna <lunajean@gmail.com>
writes


One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way was that
when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being loaded into the
ambulance she tried to open her legs - the paramedics had to stop her.
She's pretty much submitted to the idea that she's meat fodder. Of course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't crack 90 is
going to make things awfully tough for her.


I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like to
have an IQ like that.

99 is about the average IQ, with 85-99 being the low average, and 100-114
being the high average.
So 90 isn't really all that low. It's more like "ditzy".
There are different factors when it comes to IQ anyway. The ability to sing
and understand music is a relatively high-level brain function, yet some
people who are well below average IQ can sing and understand music
perfectly well. Maybe it's a kind of non-autistic savantism.
The same goes for "dumb" jocks. If you think about it, any seemingly
dim-witted quarter-back who can quickly choose between three possible
receivers and launch a ball in a perfect spiral and land it in the hands of
a moving target is actually deciphering and solving a real-time calculus
equation without knowing it.
I think good dancers are also displaying a very high-level brain function,
even if they have trouble tying their pointe shoes before the performance.
There's more to life than just book learnin' after all.
--
Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.
- James M. Barrie
.
User: "Thomas Dehn"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 08:45:16 AM
x-no-archive: yes
"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

99 is about the average IQ, with 85-99 being the low average,
and 100-114 being the high average.

Only for those very rare correctly calibrated IQ tests.
With most existing IQ tests, the average IQ is something
like 116. :->
Thomas
.
User: "CyberDroog"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 10:08:28 AM
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:45:16 +0100, "Thomas Dehn" <thomas-usenet@arcor.de>
wrote:

"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

99 is about the average IQ, with 85-99 being the low average,
and 100-114 being the high average.


Only for those very rare correctly calibrated IQ tests.
With most existing IQ tests, the average IQ is something
like 116. :->

I think that is a modern liberal American invention. Raise the average by
lowering the standards. Problem solved.
--
If absolute power corrupts absolutely, does absolute powerlessness make you
pure?
- Harry Shearer
.
User: "Alan Harding"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 11:51:28 AM
In message <epavn35j61mt2hmd5kpdmii0kppn79rbff@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:45:16 +0100, "Thomas Dehn" <thomas-usenet@arcor.de>
wrote:

"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

99 is about the average IQ, with 85-99 being the low average,
and 100-114 being the high average.


Only for those very rare correctly calibrated IQ tests.
With most existing IQ tests, the average IQ is something
like 116. :->


I think that is a modern liberal American invention. Raise the average by
lowering the standards. Problem solved.

President Eisenhower, when informed that half the American public was
below average on IQ tests, asked what could be done about it.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.



User: "Janithor"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 04:42:58 AM
x-no-archive: yes
CyberDroog wrote:

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 01:24:32 +0000, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:


In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna <lunajean@gmail.com>
writes

One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way was that
when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being loaded into the
ambulance she tried to open her legs - the paramedics had to stop her.
She's pretty much submitted to the idea that she's meat fodder. Of course,
having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably doesn't crack 90 is
going to make things awfully tough for her.


I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like to
have an IQ like that.



99 is about the average IQ, with 85-99 being the low average, and 100-114
being the high average.

So 90 isn't really all that low. It's more like "ditzy".

There are different factors when it comes to IQ anyway. The ability to sing
and understand music is a relatively high-level brain function, yet some
people who are well below average IQ can sing and understand music
perfectly well. Maybe it's a kind of non-autistic savantism.

The same goes for "dumb" jocks. If you think about it, any seemingly
dim-witted quarter-back who can quickly choose between three possible
receivers and launch a ball in a perfect spiral and land it in the hands of
a moving target is actually deciphering and solving a real-time calculus
equation without knowing it.

I think good dancers are also displaying a very high-level brain function,
even if they have trouble tying their pointe shoes before the performance.

There's more to life than just book learnin' after all.

I used to pride myself on being relatively smart. Then a friend
challenged me, and said if I'm so smart, then why can't I solve my own
problems? I think he had a very good point, it was one of those
catalyst moments for me I think, where I started to learn to depend on
myself more than others.
.
User: "Teilhard Knight"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 09:06:13 AM
On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:42:58 -0800, Janithor wrote:

x-no-archive: yes

CyberDroog wrote:

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 01:24:32 +0000, Alan Harding
<Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:


In message <YpAfj.5048$EA5.2523@pd7urf2no>, Luna <lunajean@gmail.com>
writes

One report that struck me as particularly tragic in a bizarre way was
that when the paparazzi were swarming her as she was being loaded into
the ambulance she tried to open her legs - the paramedics had to stop
her. She's pretty much submitted to the idea that she's meat fodder.
Of course, having a fucked up upbringing and an IQ that probably
doesn't crack 90 is going to make things awfully tough for her.


I've never been convinced that I understood what it would be like to
have an IQ like that.



99 is about the average IQ, with 85-99 being the low average, and
100-114 being the high average.

So 90 isn't really all that low. It's more like "ditzy".

There are different factors when it comes to IQ anyway. The ability to
sing and understand music is a relatively high-level brain function,
yet some people who are well below average IQ can sing and understand
music perfectly well. Maybe it's a kind of non-autistic savantism.

The same goes for "dumb" jocks. If you think about it, any seemingly
dim-witted quarter-back who can quickly choose between three possible
receivers and launch a ball in a perfect spiral and land it in the
hands of a moving target is actually deciphering and solving a
real-time calculus equation without knowing it.

I think good dancers are also displaying a very high-level brain
function, even if they have trouble tying their pointe shoes before the
performance.

There's more to life than just book learnin' after all.



I used to pride myself on being relatively smart. Then a friend
challenged me, and said if I'm so smart, then why can't I solve my own
problems? I think he had a very good point, it was one of those
catalyst moments for me I think, where I started to learn to depend on
myself more than others.

Evidence seems to point out that intelligent people tend to have more
personal problems than average people.
--
Teilhard Knight
The Extraterrestrial
I'm not screwed up......It's all in my mind
.
User: "Luna"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 01:52:15 PM
"Teilhard Knight" <teilhk@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:5u9kn4F1gshniU3@mid.individual.net...


Evidence seems to point out that intelligent people tend to have more
personal problems than average people.

What evidence would that be? cite please, professor.
Jean


--
Teilhard Knight

The Extraterrestrial
I'm not screwed up......It's all in my mind

.


User: "Thomas Dehn"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 08:45:08 AM
x-no-archive: yes
"Janithor" <JanithorHAW@comcast.net> wrote:

I used to pride myself on being relatively smart. Then a friend
challenged me, and said if I'm so smart, then why can't I solve my own
problems? I think he had a very good point, it was one of those
catalyst moments for me I think, where I started to learn to depend on
myself more than others.

IQ tests only measure the capability to process IQ tests.
They do not measure intelligence.
Thomas
.
User: "Alan Harding"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 11:49:36 AM
In message <5u9jkvF1h1kvqU1@mid.individual.net>, Thomas Dehn
<thomas-usenet@arcor.de> writes

"Janithor" <JanithorHAW@comcast.net> wrote:

I used to pride myself on being relatively smart. Then a friend
challenged me, and said if I'm so smart, then why can't I solve my own
problems? I think he had a very good point, it was one of those
catalyst moments for me I think, where I started to learn to depend on
myself more than others.


IQ tests only measure the capability to process IQ tests.
They do not measure intelligence.

They are only supposed to measure 'general intelligence' anyway,
whatever that is. It certainly isn't the stuff Drool mentioned. They
were originally validated against success in American businessmen.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
User: "CyberDroog"

Title: Re: Britney 06 Jan 2008 03:31:40 AM
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:49:36 +0000, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

IQ tests only measure the capability to process IQ tests.
They do not measure intelligence.


They are only supposed to measure 'general intelligence' anyway,
whatever that is. It certainly isn't the stuff Drool mentioned. They
were originally validated against success in American businessmen.

Really? I have read that research indicates that IQ doesn't correlate very
well at all with success in college or the business world.
It doesn't even correlate very well with success in many sciences. American
doctors, for instance, have average IQ's of 110-115, which is well below
the "gifted" level, and far below "genius" level.
It does seem to correlate very well with success in theoretical sciences
though.
--
Like its politicians and its wars, society has the teenagers it deserves.
- JB Priestley
.
User: "Alan Harding"

Title: IQ (was: Britney) 06 Jan 2008 05:36:57 AM
In message <jn71o3d6oditsonb0c3q9db5isgh19pc13@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:49:36 +0000, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

IQ tests only measure the capability to process IQ tests.
They do not measure intelligence.


They are only supposed to measure 'general intelligence' anyway,
whatever that is. It certainly isn't the stuff Drool mentioned. They
were originally validated against success in American businessmen.


Really? I have read that research indicates that IQ doesn't correlate very
well at all with success in college or the business world.

From memory of my old psychology texts. It was a long time ago. The
testing, as well as my studying psychology. Lord, I feel old - it was
nearly thirty years ago. I'm surprised I can remember any of it.

It doesn't even correlate very well with success in many sciences. American
doctors, for instance, have average IQ's of 110-115, which is well below
the "gifted" level, and far below "genius" level.

It does seem to correlate very well with success in theoretical sciences
though.

I'm glad to see something measures as they do. It must be the most
intellectual of pursuits, so maybe IQ does measure intelligence, after
all, and all other areas have a significant amount of non-intellectual
contributions.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: IQ (was: Britney) ( was changed back to Britney ) 06 Jan 2008 09:37:26 AM
Alan Harding wrote:

In message <jn71o3d6oditsonb0c3q9db5isgh19pc13@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:49:36 +0000, Alan Harding
<Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:

IQ tests only measure the capability to process IQ tests.
They do not measure intelligence.


They are only supposed to measure 'general intelligence' anyway,
whatever that is. It certainly isn't the stuff Drool mentioned. They
were originally validated against success in American businessmen.


Really? I have read that research indicates that IQ doesn't
correlate very well at all with success in college or the business
world.

From memory of my old psychology texts. It was a long time ago. The
testing, as well as my studying psychology. Lord, I feel old - it was
nearly thirty years ago. I'm surprised I can remember any of it.

It doesn't even correlate very well with success in many sciences.
American doctors, for instance, have average IQ's of 110-115, which
is well below the "gifted" level, and far below "genius" level.

It does seem to correlate very well with success in theoretical
sciences though.


I'm glad to see something measures as they do. It must be the most
intellectual of pursuits, so maybe IQ does measure intelligence, after
all, and all other areas have a significant amount of non-intellectual
contributions.

.


User: "cal"

Title: Re: Britney 06 Jan 2008 05:36:39 AM
On 1/6/08 4:31 AM, in article
jn71o3d6oditsonb0c3q9db5isgh19pc13@news.easynews.com, "CyberDroog"
<CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:49:36 +0000, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

IQ tests only measure the capability to process IQ tests.
They do not measure intelligence.


They are only supposed to measure 'general intelligence' anyway,
whatever that is. It certainly isn't the stuff Drool mentioned. They
were originally validated against success in American businessmen.


Really? I have read that research indicates that IQ doesn't correlate very
well at all with success in college or the business world.

It doesn't even correlate very well with success in many sciences. American
doctors, for instance, have average IQ's of 110-115, which is well below
the "gifted" level, and far below "genius" level.

i would think the practice of medicine requires a high degree of a
specialized intelligence, the ability to retain large amounts of complex
information and to recall the right information at the right time. apart
from that, i think being a good practitioner has as at least much to do with
compassion and dedication as with what we conventionally think of as
intelligence.

It does seem to correlate very well with success in theoretical sciences
though.

which may be an indication of what IQ is actually a measure of. i see it
more as an indicator of a particular aptitude, or set of aptitudes, than of
general intelligence. but i do think it measures more than the ability to
take IQ tests.
.
User: "CyberDroog"

Title: Re: Britney 06 Jan 2008 06:56:53 AM
On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:36:39 -0500, cal <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote:

On 1/6/08 4:31 AM, in article
jn71o3d6oditsonb0c3q9db5isgh19pc13@news.easynews.com, "CyberDroog"
<CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

It does seem to correlate very well with success in theoretical sciences
though.


which may be an indication of what IQ is actually a measure of. i see it
more as an indicator of a particular aptitude, or set of aptitudes, than of
general intelligence. but i do think it measures more than the ability to
take IQ tests.

I do also. Like the part of many IQ tests were you are given several frames
of a cartoon situation of some sort and are asked to put the images in
their logical order.
Then again, I recall getting one of those "wrong" and the tester said my
explanation for why I arranged them the way I did actually made sense. I
had just taken an out-of-the-box perspective on it.
--
ARENA, n. In politics, an imaginary rat-pit in which the statesman
wrestles with his record.
- Ambrose Bierce
.
User: "cal"

Title: Re: Britney 09 Jan 2008 08:46:24 AM
On 1/6/08 7:56 AM, in article
0sj1o3t9s1f583at1vv3ofknu8cqtfg0vf@news.easynews.com, "CyberDroog"
<CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:36:39 -0500, cal <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote:

On 1/6/08 4:31 AM, in article
jn71o3d6oditsonb0c3q9db5isgh19pc13@news.easynews.com, "CyberDroog"
<CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

It does seem to correlate very well with success in theoretical sciences
though.


which may be an indication of what IQ is actually a measure of. i see it
more as an indicator of a particular aptitude, or set of aptitudes, than of
general intelligence. but i do think it measures more than the ability to
take IQ tests.


I do also. Like the part of many IQ tests were you are given several frames
of a cartoon situation of some sort and are asked to put the images in
their logical order.

Then again, I recall getting one of those "wrong" and the tester said my
explanation for why I arranged them the way I did actually made sense. I
had just taken an out-of-the-box perspective on it.

ok, here's a three-part IQ question for you.
part 1 - find the item that doesn't belong in the list:
lizard
cow
dog
alligator
kite
elephant
gorilla
part 2 - are you more intelligent if you picked kite because it's not an
animal, or gorilla because it doesn't have a tail?
part 3 - if you picked lizard, what is the name of your cognitive disorder?
.
User: "Alan Harding"

Title: Re: Britney 09 Jan 2008 12:06:41 PM
In message <C3AA4870.40F42%cal1360@gmail.com>, cal <cal1360@gmail.com>
writes

On 1/6/08 7:56 AM, in article
0sj1o3t9s1f583at1vv3ofknu8cqtfg0vf@news.easynews.com, "CyberDroog"
<CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

On Sun, 06 Jan 2008 06:36:39 -0500, cal <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote:

On 1/6/08 4:31 AM, in article
jn71o3d6oditsonb0c3q9db5isgh19pc13@news.easynews.com, "CyberDroog"
<CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

It does seem to correlate very well with success in theoretical sciences
though.


which may be an indication of what IQ is actually a measure of. i see it
more as an indicator of a particular aptitude, or set of aptitudes, than of
general intelligence. but i do think it measures more than the ability to
take IQ tests.


I do also. Like the part of many IQ tests were you are given several frames
of a cartoon situation of some sort and are asked to put the images in
their logical order.

Then again, I recall getting one of those "wrong" and the tester said my
explanation for why I arranged them the way I did actually made sense. I
had just taken an out-of-the-box perspective on it.


ok, here's a three-part IQ question for you.

part 1 - find the item that doesn't belong in the list:

lizard
cow
dog
alligator
kite
elephant
gorilla

part 2 - are you more intelligent if you picked kite because it's not an
animal, or gorilla because it doesn't have a tail?

Kites are birds. They have tails.

part 3 - if you picked lizard, what is the name of your cognitive disorder?

--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.

User: "CyberDroog"

Title: Re: Britney 09 Jan 2008 09:43:36 AM
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:46:24 -0500, cal <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote:

ok, here's a three-part IQ question for you.

part 1 - find the item that doesn't belong in the list:

lizard
cow
dog
alligator
kite
elephant
gorilla

part 2 - are you more intelligent if you picked kite because it's not an
animal, or gorilla because it doesn't have a tail?

part 3 - if you picked lizard, what is the name of your cognitive disorder?

I picked Britney, because she's the only one who regularly drinks alcohol.
--
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with
sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.
- Galileo Galilei
.
User: "cal"

Title: Re: Britney 09 Jan 2008 06:11:16 PM
On 1/9/08 10:43 AM, in article
nrq9o35c0a5scgjlbcu4fd5lc55ahpu855@news.easynews.com, "CyberDroog"
<CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:

On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:46:24 -0500, cal <cal1360@gmail.com> wrote:

ok, here's a three-part IQ question for you.

part 1 - find the item that doesn't belong in the list:

lizard
cow
dog
alligator
kite
elephant
gorilla

part 2 - are you more intelligent if you picked kite because it's not an
animal, or gorilla because it doesn't have a tail?

part 3 - if you picked lizard, what is the name of your cognitive disorder?


I picked Britney, because she's the only one who regularly drinks alcohol.

where do you think the phrase "high as a kite" comes from? and the elephant,
let's not even go there.
.












User: "used2be"

Title: Re: Britney 04 Jan 2008 06:42:04 PM
"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message
news:dvhtn3dvqs5v7388njp7cfp9d03v5pdsqt@news.easynews.com...

On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:56:38 GMT, "Luna" <lunajean@gmail.com> wrote:

This is sad:

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/01_01/britney2RETNA0401_1000x730.jpg


I don't care for Britney's music or her voice, but I really hope she gets
some help. It's a crime to have someone's personal problems laid out in
the
media like that.

The residual income from her net worth is something like $750,000 per
month. If I had that kind of money, I'd pay body guards $100,000 per year
and charge them with restraining me against my will if they agreed that I
was flipping out.

wow, that's a lot of money! what does she do to earn that much money? i
don't get it!!!
.
User: "CyberDroog"

Title: Re: Britney 05 Jan 2008 01:20:40 AM
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:42:04 -0600, "used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote:

"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message


The residual income from her net worth is something like $750,000 per
month. If I had that kind of money, I'd pay body guards $100,000 per year
and charge them with restraining me against my will if they agreed that I
was flipping out.


wow, that's a lot of money! what does she do to earn that much money? i
don't get it!!!

Partly residual income from album sales and marketing, but mostly it's the
investment interest on her cash assets. What Democrats like to call
"unearned income" even though that is where all the rich Democrats get
their money. Why is it that when a bank loans you money and charges
interest, the bank is considered to have earned that money, but if you loan
the government money, Democrats call the interest you are paid "unearned
income"?
That has always been my dream. If you have $100,000,000 invested in
riskless government securities, you will earn four to six million per year
in interest.
Talk about financial freedom.
--
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain;
and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
- Albert Einstein
.

User: "slunky"

Title: Re: Britney 04 Jan 2008 06:45:04 PM
_/ used2be <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote \_

wow, that's a lot of money! what does she do to earn that much money? i
don't get it!!!

Royalties. Anytime one of her songs is played in media, she gets a
check.
--
-slunky
.




  Page 2 of 3

1

 

2

 

3

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.2109     pg.1169     pg.647     pg.357     pg.196     pg.107     pg.58     pg.31     pg.16     pg.8     pg.4     pg.2

OLDER