BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE



 Sociology > Depression > BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 
Topic: Sociology > Depression
User: "%"
Date: 31 Jan 2007 03:30:15 PM
Object: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE
like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn ,
and Rhi has never gone off on Jane or Cindi ,
and Janithor , well he gets along with everyone ,
he's never had a go round with gee who should i pick , Alan maybe ,
yes you're all so rightious and i'm all so evil
.

User: "humble life"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 05:29:03 PM
% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn ,
and Rhi has never gone off on Jane or Cindi ,
and Janithor , well he gets along with everyone ,
he's never had a go round with gee who should i pick , Alan maybe ,
yes you're all so rightious and i'm all so evil

i fancy most of the women here
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 05:57:46 PM
"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cn1kF1o46nvU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn ,
and Rhi has never gone off on Jane or Cindi ,
and Janithor , well he gets along with everyone ,
he's never had a go round with gee who should i pick , Alan maybe ,
yes you're all so rightious and i'm all so evil


i fancy most of the women here

i like everybody here
.
User: "humble life"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 06:20:06 PM
% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cn1kF1o46nvU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn ,
and Rhi has never gone off on Jane or Cindi ,
and Janithor , well he gets along with everyone ,
he's never had a go round with gee who should i pick , Alan maybe ,
yes you're all so rightious and i'm all so evil

i fancy most of the women here



i like everybody here

yeh but i fancy the women in a bonar-fide way
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 06:29:23 PM
"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cq1aF1o45dbU3@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cn1kF1o46nvU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn ,
and Rhi has never gone off on Jane or Cindi ,
and Janithor , well he gets along with everyone ,
he's never had a go round with gee who should i pick , Alan maybe ,
yes you're all so rightious and i'm all so evil

i fancy most of the women here



i like everybody here


yeh but i fancy the women in a bonar-fide way

how concrete of you
.
User: "humble life"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 06:39:14 PM
% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cq1aF1o45dbU3@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cn1kF1o46nvU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn ,
and Rhi has never gone off on Jane or Cindi ,
and Janithor , well he gets along with everyone ,
he's never had a go round with gee who should i pick , Alan maybe ,
yes you're all so rightious and i'm all so evil

i fancy most of the women here


i like everybody here

yeh but i fancy the women in a bonar-fide way



how concrete of you

utterly untrustable yet lovable
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 06:48:46 PM
"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cr56F1mtbfjU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cq1aF1o45dbU3@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cn1kF1o46nvU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn ,
and Rhi has never gone off on Jane or Cindi ,
and Janithor , well he gets along with everyone ,
he's never had a go round with gee who should i pick , Alan maybe ,
yes you're all so rightious and i'm all so evil

i fancy most of the women here


i like everybody here

yeh but i fancy the women in a bonar-fide way



how concrete of you


utterly untrustable yet lovable

you should be the asd mascot
.
User: "humble life"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 06:53:26 PM
% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cr56F1mtbfjU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cq1aF1o45dbU3@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cn1kF1o46nvU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn ,
and Rhi has never gone off on Jane or Cindi ,
and Janithor , well he gets along with everyone ,
he's never had a go round with gee who should i pick , Alan maybe ,
yes you're all so rightious and i'm all so evil

i fancy most of the women here

i like everybody here

yeh but i fancy the women in a bonar-fide way


how concrete of you

utterly untrustable yet lovable



you should be the asd mascot

i'd be torn to shreds by luna alone
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 07:09:17 PM
"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52crvqF1jcrspU1@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cr56F1mtbfjU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cq1aF1o45dbU3@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message news:52cn1kF1o46nvU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn ,
and Rhi has never gone off on Jane or Cindi ,
and Janithor , well he gets along with everyone ,
he's never had a go round with gee who should i pick , Alan maybe ,
yes you're all so rightious and i'm all so evil

i fancy most of the women here

i like everybody here

yeh but i fancy the women in a bonar-fide way


how concrete of you

utterly untrustable yet lovable



you should be the asd mascot


i'd be torn to shreds by luna alone

yea , i can understand that
.

User: "Franz Bestuchev"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 09:12:57 PM
then humble life wrote, On 1/31/2007 5:53 PM:

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:52cr56F1mtbfjU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:52cq1aF1o45dbU3@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:52cn1kF1o46nvU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn , and Rhi has
never gone off on Jane or Cindi , and Janithor , well he gets
along with everyone , he's never had a go round with gee who
should i pick , Alan maybe , yes you're all so rightious and i'm
all so evil

i fancy most of the women here

i like everybody here

yeh but i fancy the women in a bonar-fide way


how concrete of you

utterly untrustable yet lovable



you should be the asd mascot


i'd be torn to shreds by luna alone

she already promised to love me long time
.
User: "humble life"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 11:24:53 PM
Franz Bestuchev wrote:

then humble life wrote, On 1/31/2007 5:53 PM:

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:52cr56F1mtbfjU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:52cq1aF1o45dbU3@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

"humble life" <humble.life@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:52cn1kF1o46nvU2@mid.individual.net...

% wrote:

like Cal has never had words with Franz or Glenn , and Rhi has
never gone off on Jane or Cindi , and Janithor , well he gets
along with everyone , he's never had a go round with gee who
should i pick , Alan maybe , yes you're all so rightious and
i'm all so evil

i fancy most of the women here

i like everybody here

yeh but i fancy the women in a bonar-fide way


how concrete of you

utterly untrustable yet lovable



you should be the asd mascot


i'd be torn to shreds by luna alone


she already promised to love me long time

that's exactly what i mean
.









User: "used2be"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 03:50:09 PM
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious

we are?
*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil

no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes we're nice.
sometimes we're a bit of both.
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 03:59:00 PM
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:45c10efa$0$28083$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...


"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious


we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil


no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes we're nice.
sometimes we're a bit of both.

sometimes some don't recognize that

.
User: "used2be"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 04:09:18 PM
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:89adnWCnD5mpjFzYnZ2dnUVZ_rSjnZ2d@giganews.com...


"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:45c10efa$0$28083$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...


"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious


we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil


no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes we're
nice.
sometimes we're a bit of both.



sometimes some don't recognize that

your computer is doing that thing again.
maybe our computers should run off together and we should buy new ones, ya
think?
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 04:17:05 PM
"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:45c11377$0$1342$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...


"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:89adnWCnD5mpjFzYnZ2dnUVZ_rSjnZ2d@giganews.com...


"used2be" <used2be@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:45c10efa$0$28083$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...


"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious


we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil


no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes we're
nice.
sometimes we're a bit of both.



sometimes some don't recognize that


your computer is doing that thing again.

maybe our computers should run off together and we should buy new ones, ya
think?


i wish i could see what you see cause it looks fine here ,
nice spaces between replies , as for our computers ,
its not a bad idea i think mine just needs someone ,
more dareing than i am , i know what to do ,
but i'm afraid if i don't do it right ,
i'll really mess it up and have nothing at all
.



User: "Franz Bestuchev"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 31 Jan 2007 09:12:02 PM
then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:

"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious


we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil


no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes we're nice.
sometimes we're a bit of both.



Hey, yea! You're too nice.
Wanna have a beef?
.
User: "used2be"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 01 Feb 2007 04:38:42 PM
"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...

then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:

"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious


we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil


no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes we're
nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.




Hey, yea! You're too nice.

Wanna have a beef?

what are we gonna have a beef over?
.
User: "Franz Bestuchev"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 12:58:41 AM
then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:

"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...

then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:

"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious

we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil

no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes we're
nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.



Hey, yea! You're too nice.

Wanna have a beef?


what are we gonna have a beef over?


I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the usefulness of Texas.
.
User: "used2be"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 03:54:13 PM
"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52g5p1F1or3aiU3@mid.individual.net...

then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:

"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...

then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:

"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious

we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil

no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes we're
nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.



Hey, yea! You're too nice.

Wanna have a beef?


what are we gonna have a beef over?


I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the usefulness of
Texas.

what's to argue?
;-)
.

User: "Janithor"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 01:05:16 AM
x-no-archive: yes
Franz Bestuchev wrote:

then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:

"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...

then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:

"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious


we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil


no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes
we're nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.



Hey, yea! You're too nice.

Wanna have a beef?



what are we gonna have a beef over?


I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the usefulness of Texas.

"Don't you dare take the name of Texas in vain!" - Sandy Cheeks
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 01:08:35 AM
"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45C2E22F.4090605@comcast.net...

x-no-archive: yes

Franz Bestuchev wrote:

then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:

"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...

then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:

"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote

yes you're all so rightious


we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*

and i'm all so evil


no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes
we're nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.



Hey, yea! You're too nice.

Wanna have a beef?



what are we gonna have a beef over?


I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the usefulness of

Texas.



"Don't you dare take the name of Texas in vain!" - Sandy Cheeks

now had i have said this ,
it would be some major attack on the individual ,
with no joke and nothing reguarding the state


.
User: "Justin ."

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 01:20:30 AM
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fYmdnQ7Aqrl0fl_YnZ2dnUVZ_ubinZ2d@giganews.com...
|
| "Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
| news:45C2E22F.4090605@comcast.net...
| > x-no-archive: yes
| >
| > Franz Bestuchev wrote:
| > > then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:
| > >
| > >> "Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > >> news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...
| > >>
| > >>> then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:
| > >>>
| > >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote
| > >>>>
| > >>>>> yes you're all so rightious
| > >>>>
| > >>>> we are?
| > >>>>
| > >>>> *looking at myself in confused disagreement*
| > >>>>
| > >>>>> and i'm all so evil
| > >>>>
| > >>>> no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes
| > >>>> we're nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>> Hey, yea! You're too nice.
| > >>>
| > >>> Wanna have a beef?
| > >>
| > >>
| > >> what are we gonna have a beef over?
| > >>
| > >
| > > I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the usefulness of
| Texas.
| >
| >
| > "Don't you dare take the name of Texas in vain!" - Sandy Cheeks
|
|
| now had i have said this ,
| it would be some major attack on the individual ,
| with no joke and nothing reguarding the state
|
|
| >
|
That's because everything you say is da truth, aint it?
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 01:21:16 AM
"Justin" <.> wrote in message
news:45c2e63c$0$1639$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...


"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fYmdnQ7Aqrl0fl_YnZ2dnUVZ_ubinZ2d@giganews.com...
|
| "Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
| news:45C2E22F.4090605@comcast.net...
| > x-no-archive: yes
| >
| > Franz Bestuchev wrote:
| > > then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:
| > >
| > >> "Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
| > >> news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...
| > >>
| > >>> then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:
| > >>>
| > >>>> "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote
| > >>>>
| > >>>>> yes you're all so rightious
| > >>>>
| > >>>> we are?
| > >>>>
| > >>>> *looking at myself in confused disagreement*
| > >>>>
| > >>>>> and i'm all so evil
| > >>>>
| > >>>> no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck.

sometimes

| > >>>> we're nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>>>
| > >>> Hey, yea! You're too nice.
| > >>>
| > >>> Wanna have a beef?
| > >>
| > >>
| > >> what are we gonna have a beef over?
| > >>
| > >
| > > I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the

usefulness of

| Texas.
| >
| >
| > "Don't you dare take the name of Texas in vain!" - Sandy Cheeks
|
|
| now had i have said this ,
| it would be some major attack on the individual ,
| with no joke and nothing reguarding the state
|
|
| >
|


That's because everything you say is da truth, aint it?


of course it is ,
and that is why i use you ,
to raise my post count ,
and you play your part so well ,
now rush right back and reply ,
so i can make over 3000 again this month
.


User: "Janithor"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 01:23:41 AM
x-no-archive: yes
% wrote:

"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45C2E22F.4090605@comcast.net...

x-no-archive: yes

Franz Bestuchev wrote:

then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:


"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...


then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:


"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote


yes you're all so rightious


we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*


and i'm all so evil


no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes
we're nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.




Hey, yea! You're too nice.

Wanna have a beef?



what are we gonna have a beef over?


I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the usefulness of


Texas.


"Don't you dare take the name of Texas in vain!" - Sandy Cheeks




now had i have said this ,
it would be some major attack on the individual ,
with no joke and nothing reguarding the state

No. Now you're taking what I said to the extreme. Scale it back a
little, I wasn't going nuclear on you. I wasn't attacking you, I wasn't
insulting you, I was just trying to have a discussion.
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 01:33:42 AM
"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45C2E67F.6080306@comcast.net...

x-no-archive: yes

% wrote:

"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45C2E22F.4090605@comcast.net...

x-no-archive: yes

Franz Bestuchev wrote:

then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:


"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...


then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:


"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote


yes you're all so rightious


we are?

*looking at myself in confused disagreement*


and i'm all so evil


no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes
we're nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.




Hey, yea! You're too nice.

Wanna have a beef?



what are we gonna have a beef over?


I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the usefulness

of


Texas.


"Don't you dare take the name of Texas in vain!" - Sandy Cheeks




now had i have said this ,
it would be some major attack on the individual ,
with no joke and nothing reguarding the state



No. Now you're taking what I said to the extreme. Scale it back a
little, I wasn't going nuclear on you. I wasn't attacking you, I

wasn't

insulting you, I was just trying to have a discussion.

if that was true it would've been more give and take ,
or , share share , i replied to you in earnest , you still haven't
showed me ,
an example of what you made claim to so i can explain what happend ,
leaving me too believe this is just another dig effort at me ,
that i will save along with the ones that will follow and then i'll snap
,
and hit you're whole family which i agree is unfare but anger is what
anger does ,
especially when a guy knows dad comments will ***** some people off ,
so in your own for instance yea i did say some underservings ,
but only after you went to the well and spoke about my father ,
it wasn't me that cocked the first round see what i'm saying yet ,
and this holds true for all i turn on
.
User: "Janithor"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 02:05:16 AM
x-no-archive: yes
% wrote:

if that was true it would've been more give and take ,
or , share share , i replied to you in earnest , you still haven't
showed me ,
an example of what you made claim to so i can explain what happend ,
leaving me too believe this is just another dig effort at me ,

OK, now I really don't know what you're referring to. It is share
share, I'm replying to you in earnest as well. This is exactly what my
original point was tonight. I'm not digging at you, not right now, not
once tonight.

that i will save along with the ones that will follow and then i'll snap
,
and hit you're whole family which i agree is unfare but anger is what
anger does ,
especially when a guy knows dad comments will ***** some people off ,
so in your own for instance yea i did say some underservings ,
but only after you went to the well and spoke about my father ,
it wasn't me that cocked the first round see what i'm saying yet ,
and this holds true for all i turn on

No, I didn't know it would set you off so much. In part, because in the
past, you usually end up saying you're not really upset, you're happy,
everything is great, etc...so I don't know what to believe sometimes.
Sorry about the dad comment, OK? The thing is, you won't talk about it.
I've seen you talk about it one time in almost 10 years I've been
here. Only one time have I seen you talk about it in more than a
passing one-line reference.
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 02:10:22 AM
"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45C2F03E.3030103@comcast.net...

x-no-archive: yes

% wrote:

if that was true it would've been more give and take ,
or , share share , i replied to you in earnest , you still haven't
showed me ,
an example of what you made claim to so i can explain what happend ,
leaving me too believe this is just another dig effort at me ,


OK, now I really don't know what you're referring to. It is share
share, I'm replying to you in earnest as well. This is exactly what

my

original point was tonight. I'm not digging at you, not right now,

not

once tonight.

that i will save along with the ones that will follow and then i'll

snap

,
and hit you're whole family which i agree is unfare but anger is

what

anger does ,
especially when a guy knows dad comments will ***** some people off ,
so in your own for instance yea i did say some underservings ,
but only after you went to the well and spoke about my father ,
it wasn't me that cocked the first round see what i'm saying yet ,
and this holds true for all i turn on


No, I didn't know it would set you off so much. In part, because in

the

past, you usually end up saying you're not really upset, you're happy,
everything is great, etc...so I don't know what to believe sometimes.
Sorry about the dad comment, OK? The thing is, you won't talk about

it.

I've seen you talk about it one time in almost 10 years I've been
here. Only one time have I seen you talk about it in more than a
passing one-line reference.

yea but i had you going thinking it bugged me , didn't i ,
fact is , its asd , there's nothing anyone can say ,
i'm just like your friend wombn , nothing gets to me ,
even the fact that you didn't show an example of what you claim i do ,
and i'll tell you why it didn't bug me ,
its because i knew before i asked that you couldn't / wouldn't do it
.
User: "Janithor"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 02:20:44 AM
x-no-archive: yes
% wrote:

yea but i had you going thinking it bugged me , didn't i ,
fact is , its asd , there's nothing anyone can say ,
i'm just like your friend wombn , nothing gets to me ,
even the fact that you didn't show an example of what you claim i do ,
and i'll tell you why it didn't bug me ,
its because i knew before i asked that you couldn't / wouldn't do it

QED
Nighty night, rabbit. Time for me to crash.
.




User: "Justin ."

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 01:30:34 AM
"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45C2E67F.6080306@comcast.net...
| x-no-archive: yes
|
| % wrote:
| > "Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
| > news:45C2E22F.4090605@comcast.net...
| >
| >>x-no-archive: yes
| >>
| >>Franz Bestuchev wrote:
| >>
| >>>then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>>"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
| >>>>news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>>then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:
| >>>>>
| >>>>>
| >>>>>>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>>yes you're all so rightious
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>we are?
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>*looking at myself in confused disagreement*
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>>and i'm all so evil
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes
| >>>>>>we're nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>
| >>>>>Hey, yea! You're too nice.
| >>>>>
| >>>>>Wanna have a beef?
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>what are we gonna have a beef over?
| >>>>
| >>>
| >>>I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the usefulness of
| >>
| > Texas.
| >
| >>
| >>"Don't you dare take the name of Texas in vain!" - Sandy Cheeks
| >
| >
| >
| > now had i have said this ,
| > it would be some major attack on the individual ,
| > with no joke and nothing reguarding the state
|
|
| No. Now you're taking what I said to the extreme. Scale it back a
| little, I wasn't going nuclear on you. I wasn't attacking you, I wasn't
| insulting you, I was just trying to have a discussion.
|
You are wasting your time Thor, he tells the truth...... and you will
always be WRONG, and after insulting your partner the way he does, and he
has done it several times, beats the ***** out of me why you don't stand up
for Wombn at least, you must have a good sense of humour.
Sorry, just my .02 cents
.
User: "Janithor"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 01:36:21 AM
x-no-archive: yes
Justin wrote:

"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45C2E67F.6080306@comcast.net...
| x-no-archive: yes
|
| % wrote:
| > "Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
| > news:45C2E22F.4090605@comcast.net...
| >
| >>x-no-archive: yes
| >>
| >>Franz Bestuchev wrote:
| >>
| >>>then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>>"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
| >>>>news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>>then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:
| >>>>>
| >>>>>
| >>>>>>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>>yes you're all so rightious
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>we are?
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>*looking at myself in confused disagreement*
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>>and i'm all so evil
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck. sometimes
| >>>>>>we're nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>
| >>>>>Hey, yea! You're too nice.
| >>>>>
| >>>>>Wanna have a beef?
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>what are we gonna have a beef over?
| >>>>
| >>>
| >>>I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the usefulness of
| >>
| > Texas.
| >
| >>
| >>"Don't you dare take the name of Texas in vain!" - Sandy Cheeks
| >
| >
| >
| > now had i have said this ,
| > it would be some major attack on the individual ,
| > with no joke and nothing reguarding the state
|
|
| No. Now you're taking what I said to the extreme. Scale it back a
| little, I wasn't going nuclear on you. I wasn't attacking you, I wasn't
| insulting you, I was just trying to have a discussion.
|


You are wasting your time Thor, he tells the truth...... and you will
always be WRONG, and after insulting your partner the way he does, and he
has done it several times, beats the ***** out of me why you don't stand up
for Wombn at least, you must have a good sense of humour.

Sorry, just my .02 cents

Well, wombn stands up for herself by being a decent person. He can try
to knock her down all he wants, it has no effect. She's not too worried
about it either, trust me. When Dave gets like that, I think it pretty
much stands on it own, I don't really need to say anything, it's pretty
obvious what it is. He pays a lot more for it than wombn does.
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: BUT NONE OF YOU EVER ARGUE 02 Feb 2007 01:43:35 AM
"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45C2E977.8050907@comcast.net...

x-no-archive: yes

Justin wrote:

"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:45C2E67F.6080306@comcast.net...
| x-no-archive: yes
|
| % wrote:
| > "Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
| > news:45C2E22F.4090605@comcast.net...
| >
| >>x-no-archive: yes
| >>
| >>Franz Bestuchev wrote:
| >>
| >>>then used2be wrote, On 2/1/2007 3:38 PM:
| >>>
| >>>
| >>>>"Franz Bestuchev" <franz.bestuchev@gmail.com> wrote in message
| >>>>news:52d443F1i1me6U3@mid.individual.net...
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>>then used2be wrote, On 1/31/2007 2:50 PM:
| >>>>>
| >>>>>
| >>>>>>"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>>yes you're all so rightious
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>we are?
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>*looking at myself in confused disagreement*
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>>and i'm all so evil
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>no more so than the next guy. sometimes we all suck.

sometimes

| >>>>>>we're nice. sometimes we're a bit of both.
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>>
| >>>>>
| >>>>>Hey, yea! You're too nice.
| >>>>>
| >>>>>Wanna have a beef?
| >>>>
| >>>>
| >>>>what are we gonna have a beef over?
| >>>>
| >>>
| >>>I don't eat beef...so I think we should argue over the

usefulness of

| >>
| > Texas.
| >
| >>
| >>"Don't you dare take the name of Texas in vain!" - Sandy Cheeks
| >
| >
| >
| > now had i have said this ,
| > it would be some major attack on the individual ,
| > with no joke and nothing reguarding the state
|
|
| No. Now you're taking what I said to the extreme. Scale it back

a

| little, I wasn't going nuclear on you. I wasn't attacking you, I

wasn't

| insulting you, I was just trying to have a discussion.
|


You are wasting your time Thor, he tells the truth...... and you

will

always be WRONG, and after insulting your partner the way he does,

and he

has done it several times, beats the ***** out of me why you don't

stand up

for Wombn at least, you must have a good sense of humour.

Sorry, just my .02 cents



Well, wombn stands up for herself by being a decent person. He can

try

to knock her down all he wants, it has no effect. She's not too

worried

about it either, trust me. When Dave gets like that, I think it

pretty

much stands on it own, I don't really need to say anything, it's

pretty

obvious what it is. He pays a lot more for it than wombn does.

well ok then , lets yack it up about her abuser ,
i haven't gone there yet
.











  Page 1 of 2

1

 

2

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER