FAO Jane



 Sociology > Depression > FAO Jane

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Sociology > Depression
User: "NT"
Date: 07 Oct 2007 07:33:23 AM
Object: FAO Jane
"Jane" <jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com <mailto:jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com>> wrote in
<news:UMadnS6VJ-OijpXanZ2dnUVZ_vShnZ2d@adelphia.com>:

Hey NT, I get it, and now you're becoming the pain in the ***** he is.
Why don't you just post your email address instead of all the info,
people will email you if they want to turn him in.

Now your just cluttering the group with more crap, don't you think we
have enough of it flowing through here?

Dear Jane,
I only became aware of this group because one poster became so
confident in his control here, that he crossposted his unacceptable
perversions, and they are now in the wider realm of usenet.
I have briefly looked up his posting track record and included his
other known ID of cyberhive. I also briefly looked up your ID of
jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com and you seem to be a long term
non-provocative, supportive and calm poster to this group, but also
you may have been not only a victim of HyperScribes postings but
also a one time victim of the sort of perverted acts that HyperScribe
advocates? So I have to admit I find your comments quite shocking.
What is only too evident at browsing the google archive for this group
is the actual lack of support, and the unfathomable pointless drivel
posted by some? And abusive posts by subscribers to this group is
apparently the norm? Such posts dominate the google archive.
The poster HyperScribe seemingly arrived at the point that he felt he
had total manipulative and disruptive control within this group to such
an extent that he could reveal his evil and criminal intentions without
fear of consequence, his mistake was to crosspost.
If by your comments Jane, you're implying you are someone who turns
a blind eye, not only is that disappointing, it could also be construed
as a form of consent.
If anyone in this group, who shocked by the evil conduct of the poster
HyperScribe, failed to act, failed to report their concerns, then they
are aiding and abetting.
Again, I supply the links for reporting the unacceptable and illegal
posts of HyperScribe, and if you Jane feel it is my posts and not
HyperScribes that are disruptive, it raises the question of your role
as a poster to this so-called support group?
The links for reporting HyperScribe:
HyperScribes ISP:

NSPCC (Childline):

UK social Sevices:

These two links are to Government agencies sites concerning any and
all criminal online activity, terrorsm, grooming, drugs, violence etc
http://www.ceop.gov.uk/ internet Watch Foundation: http://www.iwf.org.uk/
If any have already submitted reports, then do it again. Many complaints
will ensure results.
.

User: "Jane"

Title: Re: FAO Jane 07 Oct 2007 08:40:39 AM
I don't want to get into a long drawn out conversation with you about my
personal experiences.
I applaud your post, really I do, but to post it over and over again serves
no purpose really, it's just more clutter. That was why I suggested posting
your email address instead of the 4k post over and over again.
I took your advice by the way and did not turn the other cheek, I've forward
his messages to all abuse email addresses each time he adds on to it.
I'm not always passive here, but this particular subject is beyond my
control to remain passive.
All I'm asking is you do not need to reply to each of his disgusting posts
with your post. One per thread should be more then enough, or one post a
day should be enough. Your post will be seen and it's archived as well.
Jane
"NT" <not@telling.uk.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99C289DE7291nottellingukcom@216.196.109.145...

"Jane" <jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com
<mailto:jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com>> wrote in
<news:UMadnS6VJ-OijpXanZ2dnUVZ_vShnZ2d@adelphia.com>:

Hey NT, I get it, and now you're becoming the pain in the ***** he is.
Why don't you just post your email address instead of all the info,
people will email you if they want to turn him in.

Now your just cluttering the group with more crap, don't you think we
have enough of it flowing through here?


Dear Jane,
I only became aware of this group because one poster became so
confident in his control here, that he crossposted his unacceptable
perversions, and they are now in the wider realm of usenet.
I have briefly looked up his posting track record and included his
other known ID of cyberhive. I also briefly looked up your ID of
jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com and you seem to be a long term
non-provocative, supportive and calm poster to this group, but also
you may have been not only a victim of HyperScribes postings but
also a one time victim of the sort of perverted acts that HyperScribe
advocates? So I have to admit I find your comments quite shocking.

What is only too evident at browsing the google archive for this group
is the actual lack of support, and the unfathomable pointless drivel
posted by some? And abusive posts by subscribers to this group is
apparently the norm? Such posts dominate the google archive.
The poster HyperScribe seemingly arrived at the point that he felt he
had total manipulative and disruptive control within this group to such
an extent that he could reveal his evil and criminal intentions without
fear of consequence, his mistake was to crosspost.
If by your comments Jane, you're implying you are someone who turns
a blind eye, not only is that disappointing, it could also be construed
as a form of consent.

If anyone in this group, who shocked by the evil conduct of the poster
HyperScribe, failed to act, failed to report their concerns, then they
are aiding and abetting.

Again, I supply the links for reporting the unacceptable and illegal
posts of HyperScribe, and if you Jane feel it is my posts and not
HyperScribes that are disruptive, it raises the question of your role
as a poster to this so-called support group?
The links for reporting HyperScribe:
HyperScribes ISP:


NSPCC (Childline):

UK social Sevices:

These two links are to Government agencies sites concerning any and
all criminal online activity, terrorsm, grooming, drugs, violence etc
http://www.ceop.gov.uk/ internet Watch Foundation: http://www.iwf.org.uk/

If any have already submitted reports, then do it again. Many complaints
will ensure results.

.

User: "cal"

Title: Re: FAO Jane 07 Oct 2007 12:12:16 PM
On 10/7/07 8:33 AM, in article
Xns99C289DE7291nottellingukcom@216.196.109.145, "NT" <not@telling.uk.com>
wrote:

"Jane" <jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com <mailto:jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com>>
wrote in
<news:UMadnS6VJ-OijpXanZ2dnUVZ_vShnZ2d@adelphia.com>:

Hey NT, I get it, and now you're becoming the pain in the ***** he is.
Why don't you just post your email address instead of all the info,
people will email you if they want to turn him in.

Now your just cluttering the group with more crap, don't you think we
have enough of it flowing through here?


Dear Jane,
I only became aware of this group because one poster became so
confident in his control here, that he crossposted his unacceptable
perversions, and they are now in the wider realm of usenet.
I have briefly looked up his posting track record and included his
other known ID of cyberhive. I also briefly looked up your ID of
jarsenal66nospam@hotmail.com and you seem to be a long term
non-provocative, supportive and calm poster to this group, but also
you may have been not only a victim of HyperScribes postings but
also a one time victim of the sort of perverted acts that HyperScribe
advocates? So I have to admit I find your comments quite shocking.

What is only too evident at browsing the google archive for this group
is the actual lack of support, and the unfathomable pointless drivel
posted by some? And abusive posts by subscribers to this group is
apparently the norm? Such posts dominate the google archive.
The poster HyperScribe seemingly arrived at the point that he felt he
had total manipulative and disruptive control within this group to such
an extent that he could reveal his evil and criminal intentions without
fear of consequence, his mistake was to crosspost.
If by your comments Jane, you're implying you are someone who turns
a blind eye, not only is that disappointing, it could also be construed
as a form of consent.

begone, horrid net-nanny.
.

User: "Franz Bestuchev"

Title: Re: FAO Jane 07 Oct 2007 11:33:21 AM
On 10/7/2007 6:33 AM, NT was all like:


What is only too evident at browsing the google archive for this group
is the actual lack of support, and the unfathomable pointless drivel
posted by some? And abusive posts by subscribers to this group is
apparently the norm? Such posts dominate the google archive.

As the ASD Secretary General, I can assure you that your comments will
be brought to the attention of the formal ASD Parliamentary body at its
next meeting.
Thanks for your input.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER