| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
09 Jul 2006 10:15:02 PM |
| Object: |
Feminism is misogyny |
American feminism is against the essence of what woman IS.
It takes oppositional stance to all good qualities of which women are
more easily capable than are men, including tenderness, warmth,
elegance, physical beauty, kindness, delicacy, and emotional richness.
And it attacks those - both men and women - who would appreciate and
rightly reward such qualities with love and appreciation that they
deserve.
Therefore it is in essence misogynistic and should be seen as such -
both by women and by men.
Ilya Shambat
http://ibshambat.blogspot.com
.
|
|
| User: "stumper" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny in the stumpman's circus of laughs |
15 Jul 2006 04:51:17 PM |
|
|
fe'do wrote:
"stumper" <stumper@newvessel.com> wrote in message
news:w0mdneYafp7swSTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
fe'do wrote:
"stumper" <stumper@newvessel.com> wrote in message
news:TTqdnR4nN8YZrSTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
fe'do wrote:
"stumper" <stumper@newvessel.com> wrote in message
news:5gGdneHvMbFtgCTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who
didn't
will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity,
too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own
work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism,
ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get
this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on
welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
already got one, it's called making
stumper look like a fool, and judging
from the many ways you already make
yourself look foolish, it's quite an
easy job with many many hilarious
rewards.
oh, and BTW, you're welcome....
I don't mind being a fool.
that certainly goes without saying
Otherwise, I wouldn't be saying
I am going straight -- don't know.
How about you?
Aren't you afraid of being a fool?
yuck it up fuzzball
If a fool is smart enough
to fool himself all the time,
is he really a fool?
you tell us. after all, you
are the expert fool.
So far, you have failed miserable
to help anyone lessen their suffering
including your own.
Do you still want me to help you?
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
|
| User: "fedo" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny in the stumpman's circus of laughs |
15 Jul 2006 07:20:04 PM |
|
|
"stumper" <stumper@newvessel.com> wrote in message
news:bEqdnXMjSs-p_iTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
fe'do wrote:
"stumper" <stumper@newvessel.com> wrote in message
news:w0mdneYafp7swSTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
fe'do wrote:
"stumper" <stumper@newvessel.com> wrote in message
news:TTqdnR4nN8YZrSTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
fe'do wrote:
"stumper" <stumper@newvessel.com> wrote in message
news:5gGdneHvMbFtgCTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who
didn't
will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at
my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic
probity,
too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own
work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism,
ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get
this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on
welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
already got one, it's called making
stumper look like a fool, and judging
from the many ways you already make
yourself look foolish, it's quite an
easy job with many many hilarious
rewards.
oh, and BTW, you're welcome....
I don't mind being a fool.
that certainly goes without saying
Otherwise, I wouldn't be saying
I am going straight -- don't know.
How about you?
Aren't you afraid of being a fool?
yuck it up fuzzball
If a fool is smart enough
to fool himself all the time,
is he really a fool?
you tell us. after all, you
are the expert fool.
So far, you have failed miserable
to help anyone lessen their suffering
including your own.
wasn't what i set out to do.
this is what you expect of
me. can you see the
difference?
Do you still want me to help you?
you haven't so far.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis M. Hammes" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny in the stumpman's circus of laughs |
16 Jul 2006 03:04:17 AM |
|
|
stumper wrote:
If a fool is smart enough
to fool himself all the time,
is he really a fool?
Well -- you're obviously stupid enough to be unable to answer the
question, which is not even a conundrum, let alone a dilemma.
(Hint: only the lowest sort of fool would even want to set up the
parameters.)
I begin to see that you fool yourself about being "honored" to pay
taxes by being so clever as to have nothing to loot.
At which point you /must/ impose taxes.
Against which you fool yourself about being too yellow to defend
by bragging that you're not worth a good weapons cleaning.
'Sokay, I need the target practice.
(No, I'm worth /routine/ weapons cleaning.)
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
Thistles have been the favorite food of songbirds for eons.
http://scrawlmark.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "stumper" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny in the stumpman's circus of laughs |
16 Jul 2006 01:56:41 PM |
|
|
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
If a fool is smart enough
to fool himself all the time,
is he really a fool?
Well -- you're obviously stupid enough to be unable to answer the
question, which is not even a conundrum, let alone a dilemma.
(Hint: only the lowest sort of fool would even want to set up the
parameters.)
I begin to see that you fool yourself about being "honored" to pay taxes
by being so clever as to have nothing to loot.
At which point you /must/ impose taxes.
Against which you fool yourself about being too yellow to defend by
bragging that you're not worth a good weapons cleaning.
'Sokay, I need the target practice.
(No, I'm worth /routine/ weapons cleaning.)
Do you have to confess that much to me?
Find your own priest, please.
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis M. Hammes" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny in the stumpman's circus of laughs |
16 Jul 2006 02:53:54 AM |
|
|
stumper wrote:
Aren't you afraid of being a fool?
Figured. No Blue Belt (even).
One of the very first lessons for the thing (which is the first
student grade; Yellow, the entrance exam, is for holding your pants up).
If you're afraid to look a fool (and your question was purely
rhetorical), you'll never learn a dam' thing.
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
Thistles have been the favorite food of songbirds for eons.
http://scrawlmark.org
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis M. Hammes" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
16 Jul 2006 02:49:35 AM |
|
|
stumper wrote:
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHaaahha.aa.ha..aa...
Tnx, I needed that.
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
Thistles have been the favorite food of songbirds for eons.
http://scrawlmark.org
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sherrie Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 01:06:22 PM |
|
|
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
|
| User: "stumper" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 01:17:48 PM |
|
|
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis M. Hammes" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
16 Jul 2006 03:09:33 AM |
|
|
stumper wrote:
If you need more, work a little more.
So she can be "proud" to pay you a little more?
"In a pig's *****."
It's a guardian angel. You declared it "dirty" because you were
too yellow to learn it.
But you obviously remembered it.
Which means it did /its/ job.
You got any more in there? How many angels /can/ sit on a
pinhead, anyway?
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
Thistles have been the favorite food of songbirds for eons.
http://scrawlmark.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "stumper" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
16 Jul 2006 01:58:04 PM |
|
|
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
If you need more, work a little more.
So she can be "proud" to pay you a little more?
"In a pig's *****."
It's a guardian angel. You declared it "dirty" because you were too
yellow to learn it.
But you obviously remembered it.
Which means it did /its/ job.
You got any more in there? How many angels /can/ sit on a pinhead,
anyway?
Mammon is an idol.
Not worth worshiping.
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis M. Hammes" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
17 Jul 2006 02:00:48 AM |
|
|
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
If you need more, work a little more.
So she can be "proud" to pay you a little more?
"In a pig's *****."
It's a guardian angel. You declared it "dirty" because you were too
yellow to learn it.
But you obviously remembered it.
Which means it did /its/ job.
You got any more in there? How many angels /can/ sit on a pinhead,
anyway?
Mammon is an idol.
Not worth worshiping.
"Mammom," f.I-E. /ama-ama-on/ ("same-same-neuternoun"), are "those
who do the same thing at the same time."
I.e., the congregation or student body.
But you're quite right, they're not worth worshipping.
The sum of zeros is zero.
A "guardian angel" is a small "message" (/aggelos/, "word-herd") that
will keep your ***** in one piece if /you/ pay attention to /it/, and
not the converse.
"In a pig's *****" is a short form of the Riot Act, f. on the same
judgement as "to cast your demons into swine," which contains too
many words for the monkey to remember and too many tenors for the
monkey to "believe in."
Nevertheless, I'll be a monkey's uncle.
And if you're so fulla Protestant baby ***** that you don't survive
the baptism, then even your Mommy will know exactly what is meant by
the phrase, "tough *****."
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
Thistles have been the favorite food of songbirds for eons.
http://scrawlmark.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "stumper" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
17 Jul 2006 09:53:29 AM |
|
|
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
If you need more, work a little more.
So she can be "proud" to pay you a little more?
"In a pig's *****."
It's a guardian angel. You declared it "dirty" because you were
too yellow to learn it.
But you obviously remembered it.
Which means it did /its/ job.
You got any more in there? How many angels /can/ sit on a pinhead,
anyway?
Mammon is an idol.
Not worth worshiping.
"Mammom," f.I-E. /ama-ama-on/ ("same-same-neuternoun"), are "those who
do the same thing at the same time."
I.e., the congregation or student body.
But you're quite right, they're not worth worshipping.
The sum of zeros is zero.
A "guardian angel" is a small "message" (/aggelos/, "word-herd") that
will keep your ***** in one piece if /you/ pay attention to /it/, and not
the converse.
"In a pig's *****" is a short form of the Riot Act, f. on the same
judgement as "to cast your demons into swine," which contains too many
words for the monkey to remember and too many tenors for the monkey to
"believe in."
Nevertheless, I'll be a monkey's uncle.
And if you're so fulla Protestant baby ***** that you don't survive the
baptism, then even your Mommy will know exactly what is meant by the
phrase, "tough *****."
Mighty proud of your smallness, aren't you?
There are more things in the world than you can imagine.
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sherrie Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 03:29:09 PM |
|
|
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
|
| User: "stumper" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 03:37:22 PM |
|
|
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sherrie Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 03:56:20 PM |
|
|
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 03:59:17 PM |
|
|
LETS DO THE CROSSPOST AGAIN
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Julian" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 04:25:10 PM |
|
|
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
He's not a Mose Allison fan.
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis M. Hammes" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
16 Jul 2006 04:00:17 AM |
|
|
Julian wrote:
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
Hey. The dope started messin' around with us (rap).
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
Thistles have been the favorite food of songbirds for eons.
http://scrawlmark.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "Slim Jinn" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
17 Jul 2006 02:40:06 AM |
|
|
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
Julian wrote:
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
Hey. The dope started messin' around with us (rap).
....I left my home in Georgia
Headed for the Frisco Bay
I've got nothin' to live for
Looks like nothing's gonna come my way,yeah...
Sittin' on the dock of the bay
Watchin' the tide roll away
Sittin' on the dock of the bay
Wastin' time...
-o. redding
--
-------------------------------------------
AJ - http://ClitIn.Com e In.
(800 folders. -- kiddie-filtered -- FREE,
Usenet Porn.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sherrie Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 05:10:54 PM |
|
|
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
He's not a Mose Allison fan.
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
My friggin Julian didn't help me at all. Friggen Republicans!
He played advocate to stumps. Arsehole.
Where should I put the ' ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Julian" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 06:41:42 PM |
|
|
Sherrie Lee wrote:
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
He's not a Mose Allison fan.
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
My friggin Julian didn't help me at all. Friggen Republicans!
Get it right... I'm a fukkin' Monarchist.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Julian" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 06:43:56 PM |
|
|
Sherrie Lee wrote:
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
He's not a Mose Allison fan.
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
My friggin Julian didn't help me at all. Friggen Republicans!
Get it right... I'm a fukkin' Monarchist.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6201/1985/1600/v12p017.0.jpg
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sherrie Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 06:54:05 PM |
|
|
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
He's not a Mose Allison fan.
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
My friggin Julian didn't help me at all. Friggen Republicans!
Get it right... I'm a fukkin' Monarchist.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6201/1985/1600/v12p017.0.jpg
yabut you've no clickable links that I detect.
dare I skip the pool party?! Yes!!
f2fuk!!!!! hahahaha!!@
.
|
|
|
| User: "Julian" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 07:01:47 PM |
|
|
Sherrie Lee wrote:
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
He's not a Mose Allison fan.
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
My friggin Julian didn't help me at all. Friggen Republicans!
Get it right... I'm a fukkin' Monarchist.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6201/1985/1600/v12p017.0.jpg
yabut you've no clickable links that I detect.
dare I skip the pool party?! Yes!!
f2fuk!!!!! hahahaha!!@
Yes dear.
--
http://ptlslzb87.blogspot.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sherrie Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
16 Jul 2006 06:06:59 AM |
|
|
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
He's not a Mose Allison fan.
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
My friggin Julian didn't help me at all. Friggen Republicans!
Get it right... I'm a fukkin' Monarchist.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6201/1985/1600/v12p017.0.jpg
yabut you've no clickable links that I detect.
dare I skip the pool party?! Yes!!
f2fuk!!!!! hahahaha!!@
Yes dear.
--
http://ptlslzb87.blogspot.com/
Thanks.
Sherrie Lee (usenet girl)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Julian" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 07:02:02 PM |
|
|
Sherrie Lee wrote:
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
He's not a Mose Allison fan.
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
My friggin Julian didn't help me at all. Friggen Republicans!
Get it right... I'm a fukkin' Monarchist.
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6201/1985/1600/v12p017.0.jpg
yabut you've no clickable links that I detect.
dare I skip the pool party?! Yes!!
f2fuk!!!!! hahahaha!!@
Yes dear.
--
http://ptlslzb87.blogspot.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stumper" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 04:46:02 PM |
|
|
Julian wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
He's not a Mose Allison fan.
'When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
When you move up to the city, there's just one thing I hope
You don't take money from a woman
and don't start messin' around with dope,'
Don't worry too much about losing your job.
In spite of what some Zen masters said,
you deserve to be fed even if you don't work.
Just don't forget to sign your organ donor card, please.
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "stumper" |
|
| Title: Re: Feminism is misogyny |
15 Jul 2006 04:05:30 PM |
|
|
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
stumper wrote:
Sherrie Lee wrote:
norbu_tragri@yahoo.com wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
stumper wrote:
We all deserve better
and we can do better.
Just imagine.
No imagination needed. Any time you do better, those who didn't will
fine you for Failing To Maintain Their Equality For Them.
Usually, but not always, called "taxes."
You can alway give them away before tax.
Anyhow, you should be proud to be taxed so much.
I'm not particulary proud of being covered with mosquitos at my
picnic table, and it's exactly the same relationship.
The whining has about the same pitch and linguistic probity, too.
And whose work do you live on top of ?
Isn't that what the argument against taxation is about?
People whose income is taxed no longer live under
a government establishing the right to own property?
That Dennis lives on top of the work of others and not his own work?
Others own his property?
I don't understand taxes. I want to believe in the idealism, ideology?
But then certain zingers throw me off.
For example, someone who is employed, works 30hours a week,
quits working and collects welfare. The terms of collecting the
welfare require that the person attend a 30hr/wk workshop, get this,
on how to find a job.
Einstein said taxes are difficult for him to understand.
I'm no Einstein. Duh.
How about this. The company that the person, who is now on welfare,
worked for can hire the person back, and get this, and receive
a tax break for hiring a person on Welfare!
Help!!
[snip propaganda]
Are you getting paid to write that?
--
~Stumper
Why do you have any doubt?
Find a job you are willing to do
without getting paid.
Are welfare recipients morons, the product of hardship,
in need of a break, dangerous like the mob, striving
to advance their lifestyles, drug addicts, performing
community service, not having babies, having babies,
men, women, buying cat food, trading stamps
for bricks, bullying a kid for lunch money, driving
someone to a job interview, raising a generation
of soldiers, supporting their country with their lives,
or filling in the blank?
You worry too much about material things.
If you need more, work a little more.
If not, enjoy.
Are you on welfare because you think you're too good
for 7/11, or the fortune cookie business is saturated?
Do you know what 7/11 is?
Are you angry because you have to work?
If so, do you really think you have to live that way?
Begging for food might be good for your soul.
If you can't do that here, go to India.
Are you defensive because you can't figure out
what, "Work smart, not hard" means, so you
don't work at all?
I am working hard enough here.
I don't complain just because
I am not getting paid by the hour.
If you think you deserve a raise, ask.
If you don't feel like paying taxes, don't.
Most of all,
don't let others bother you so much.
--
~Stumper
.
|
|
| | | | | | |