| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"Tim Kett" |
| Date: |
10 Jun 2005 08:37:32 PM |
| Object: |
Fish Chimaera |
but the spelling is different...
.
|
|
| User: "Tim Kett" |
|
| Title: Re: Fish Chimaera |
10 Jun 2005 08:38:20 PM |
|
|
Opps
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimaera_(fish)
Tim Kett <tim6kettring@e-garfield.com> wrote in article
<01c56e26$e7c09de0$48f8e504@default>...
but the spelling is different...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: Fish Chimaera |
12 Jun 2005 05:32:52 PM |
|
|
In message <01c56e27$037b0160$48f8e504@default>, Tim Kett
<tim6kettring@e-garfield.com> writes
Opps
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimaera_(fish)
The Wikipaedia didn't want to cough up.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Whiskers" |
|
| Title: Re: Fish Chimaera |
13 Jun 2005 07:15:29 AM |
|
|
On 2005-06-12, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
In message <01c56e27$037b0160$48f8e504@default>, Tim Kett
<tim6kettring@e-garfield.com> writes
Opps
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimaera_(fish)
The Wikipaedia didn't want to cough up.
Probably choked on the strange fish.
--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Fish Chimaera |
10 Jun 2005 10:35:28 PM |
|
|
On 11 Jun 2005 03:38:20 +0200, "Tim Kett"
<tim6kettring@e-garfield.com> wrote:
->Opps
->
->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimaera_(fish)
Ya know, I'd never heard of that fish.
I assume the marine biologists who named it chose a variant spelling
of my nick, which refers to a mythical, composite creature.
--
I've always loved me, I was just taught that I didn't.
- %
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: Fish Chimaera |
12 Jun 2005 05:18:29 PM |
|
|
In message <uqmka1lhc90am09c4db5brcsk871742rqm@4ax.com>, notchimera
<dont@bother.com> writes
On 11 Jun 2005 03:38:20 +0200, "Tim Kett"
<tim6kettring@e-garfield.com> wrote:
->Opps
->
->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimaera_(fish)
Ya know, I'd never heard of that fish.
I assume the marine biologists who named it chose a variant spelling
of my nick, which refers to a mythical, composite creature.
Chimaera is a standard spelling here. I hadn't seen chimera till you
used it, but apparently it's okay here.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Kett" |
|
| Title: Re: Fish Chimaera |
10 Jun 2005 11:48:50 PM |
|
|
notchimera <dont@bother.com> wrote in article
<uqmka1lhc90am09c4db5brcsk871742rqm@4ax.com>...
On 11 Jun 2005 03:38:20 +0200, "Tim Kett"
<tim6kettring@e-garfield.com> wrote:
->Opps
->
->http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimaera_(fish)
Ya know, I'd never heard of that fish.
I assume the marine biologists who named it chose a variant spelling
of my nick, which refers to a mythical, composite creature.
I always wondered where you got that nick from, and thought of you when I
found it reading fish books, but also found what you are talking about.
Good luck on your book!
tim
--
I've always loved me, I was just taught that I didn't.
- %
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
