Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide



 Sociology > Depression > Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Sociology > Depression
User: "BroJack"
Date: 02 Jan 2005 07:59:08 PM
Object: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide
http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/front/10545779.htm?1c
Posted on Sun, Jan. 02, 2005

High-tech harassment is hitting teens hard
Bullying is nothing new, but it takes on a new and ominous tone in
cyberspace. Adults are catching on.
By Leslie A. Pappas
Inquirer Staff Writer
Only after Ryan Halligan hanged himself did his father realize what
the 13-year-old had been doing online.
Through three months' worth of links and instant messages saved on his
home computer, Ryan's growing pain - and the callousness of his online
tormentors - became clear.
"You're a loser," one message jabbed. There were other taunts, Web
searches on suicide, and, ultimately, threats to kill himself to get
back at school bullies.
"Tonight's the night," Ryan finally typed.
"It's about time," the screen replied.
Bullying has been around forever, but modern technologies have both
broadened its venues and cloaked its practitioners.
Instant messaging, Web journals, cell phones and e-mail let bullies
chase victims into their homes, mock them anonymously, or slander them
schoolwide with a single mouse click.
There are few solid statistics about cyber bullying, but experts agree
that it is spreading.
"Cyber bullying is so new, people don't have a clue," said Bill
Belsey, who runs a Canadian Web site called cyberbullying.ca. Belsey
first heard of cyber bullying a few years ago in Asia and Scandinavia,
where mobile technologies were more advanced.
Since then, reports have spread, taking on new forms as technology
grows. Lagging behind are adults, who struggle to comprehend the
problem, let alone combat it.
Many parents focus on dangers from sexual predators and pornography
yet remain oblivious to much of their children's online world.
Educators, meanwhile, scramble to block elusive online threats before
they slip onto school grounds.
In Ryan's case, it was school problems that followed him home through
instant messages, deepening the bullying that had started during the
day. Ryan latched on to the idea of killing himself as vengeance
against those who had hurt him.
"He was on a mission to just make these kids feel bad," said his
father, John Halligan.
The father, though well-versed in technology, had no clue until it was
too late.
An IBM manager who built his own computers, Halligan, of Essex
Junction, Vt., thought he knew the risks of letting his son have a
computer in his bedroom. His ground rules were clear: no talking to
strangers, no sharing of passwords or personal information.
After Ryan's death on Oct. 7, 2003, Halligan logged on at his son's
computer and discovered a world he never knew existed.
Students with multiple screen names had left torrid messages that
Halligan struggled to decipher. Clicking on his son's saved Web links
led to online journals where sixth- and seventh-grade girls bragged of
sexual conquests. Other Web logs skewered classmates by exposing
intimate secrets culled from private cyber chats.
"These kids thought they had their own little private world and it was
their own playground where they could do whatever they wanted,"
Halligan said. "The problem is not just about pedophiles and
strangers, but how [youths are] treating each other."
Ted Feinberg, assistant executive director of the National Association
of School Psychologists in Bethesda, Md., said the goals of a cyber
bully differ little from those of the traditional, in-your-face bully:
"to torment, to intimidate, to frighten, to disparage."
But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former
victims who use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors.
"What makes cyber bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it
can be, by and large, anonymous. You don't know where the messages are
coming from."
Such was the case last month for a 15-year-old in Delaware County,
who, for safety reasons, didn't want her name or school identified.
Shortly after she switched from a private to a public school, her
parents received an unsigned e-mail from a newly created Yahoo!
account called [your_daughter]_is_headed_for_trouble.
"Your daughter... bragged about drinking and how she can ***** around
now that she's a public school girl... Maybe you can spend the tuition
you saved on therapy," the e-mail said.
"It just made us sick," the girl's mother said. "It was basically just
like throwing a bomb."
A school investigation turned up nothing. "This could have come from
anybody, anywhere," a school official told the girl's mother in an
e-mail.
"It made me feel incredibly attacked," said the girl, who suspects a
former classmate who had picked on her. "It was so incredibly untrue."
Defaming messages also pop up on the Web, often on free online teen
journals or blogging sites.
Earlier this month at Titus Elementary School in Warrington, Bucks
County, sixth graders listened intently to a story about Alex, a teen
in the county whose classmates created a Web site titled simply
"Reasons to Hate Alex."
Mary Worthington of the Network of Victim Assistance in Bucks County
said Alex agreed to share the story as part of a new cyber bully
training program, which was created for schools to meet a growing
demand.
Schools struggle with the issue because much of the Internet activity
that creates problems at school begins at home.
"I would encourage parents to be as close to Perry Mason as they can,"
said Linda Sember, assistant principal at Beverly Hills Middle School
in Upper Darby, Delaware County, who has responded to several cyber
bullying incidents over the last year, including one death threat that
prompted the school to summon police.
But many parents don't, or won't, pay enough attention, said Rachel
Simmons, author of Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in
Girls. As a result, the Internet - like lunchrooms, rest rooms and bus
stops - has become an unsupervised place where bullies can rule.
Parents "often use their ignorance of technology to excuse themselves
for not knowing what their children are doing when they're online,"
Simmons said. "What happens as a result of that attitude is that kids
have appropriated the Internet as this place that belongs to them -
with their own rules, their own language, their own justice."
Nancy Willard, executive director of the Center for Safe and
Responsible Internet Use, based in Eugene, Ore., agrees.
"The gap between parental understanding of what is going on online and
what children report is significant in every study," Willard said.
"Kids aren't telling their parents about what's happening online, and
parents aren't making it their business to find out."
Maria Burdsall, a mother of three boys in Warrington Township, is one
exception. She uses parental software to monitor her children's online
activity, frequently checking what sites they've visited or when
they've gone online.
Burdsall acknowledges that her vigilance has not been geared toward
cyber bullying. "What scares me," she said, is the prospect of her
kids "accidentally stumbling on a porn site."
But she has made it clear, especially to her 11-year-old, Michael,
that she's watching.
"He knows I can keep track," Burdsall said. "And he knows I mean
business."
(snip)
.

User: "Eric Cordian"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 02 Jan 2005 08:44:59 PM
In alt.abuse.recovery BroJack <windswept@home.net> wrote:

Bullying is nothing new, but it takes on a new and ominous tone in
cyberspace. Adults are catching on.

Sounds like a bunch of anecdotal stories strung together to pressure
parents to invade their kids' private communications online.
There is no indication of the incidence of the problem in the general
population, and all the people quoted are clearly pushing an agenda.
Sure, I suppose a kid's schoolmates could hound him or her to suicide, but
how often does this happen, and do you really think we should give no one
under 18 any privacy at all because of a few sad stories?
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
.
User: "SpiritQuest"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 03:43:01 PM
"Eric Cordian" <emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote in message
news:41d8b1ab$0$33777$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...

In alt.abuse.recovery BroJack <windswept@home.net> wrote:

Sounds like a bunch of anecdotal stories strung together to pressure
parents to invade their kids' private communications online.

The presentation of various agendas pertaining to parents/kids here on the
internet is not uncommon. Perhaps a reasonable test of objectivity would be
whether the person posting objects to any middle ground or any other
intelligent opinion.
SpiritQuest
.
User: "Eric Cordian"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 04:38:13 PM
In alt.abuse.recovery SpiritQuest <spritquest@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Sounds like a bunch of anecdotal stories strung together to pressure
parents to invade their kids' private communications online.

The presentation of various agendas pertaining to parents/kids here on the
internet is not uncommon. Perhaps a reasonable test of objectivity would be
whether the person posting objects to any middle ground or any other
intelligent opinion.

I think a comparable situation would be phone conversations. While there
may be extrordinary circumstances in which a parent listening in on a
kid's phone conversations may serve the purpose of protecting the kid from
an immediate threat of death or serious injury, I think most reasonable
people would agree that this is not something all parents should do all
the time, in the complete absence of any justification.
We could of course write an essay comprised of little anecdotes about kids
who had come to a sticky end, which could have been prevented by such
monitoring, and include quotes from various important-sounding
organizations attempting to goad parents into always listening in.
What would be missing from such a political diatribe would be how often
such things really happen, and what is a prudent policy based on the usual
risk analysis of the amount of harm times the probability of harm.
Since the Internet is new, and the phone system is not, people can be more
easily conned by Chicken Little arguments about the Internet, than they
could about the dangers of letting their kids talk on the phone.
Sure, a kid's classmates could be taunting him to kill himself using
Instant Messages, over the phone, in person, through the mail, or though
messages pushed through the ventillation slots on his school locker. The
problematical behavior here is the bullying, not the medium through which
it is conveyed.
In a country with nearly 300 million people, you can always find at least
three examples of anything. And parenting "experts" who claim no one under
18 should ever be allowed to have a computer or TV in their room will
always find some excuse to trumpet.
The mistake is in thinking this is some sort of scientific advice, and not
just weaselwording to rationalize some political faction's power and
control agenda.
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
.


User: "James"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 02 Jan 2005 10:52:29 PM
On 03 Jan 2005 02:44:59 GMT, Eric Cordian
<emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote in message
<41d8b1ab$0$33777$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org> the following:

In alt.abuse.recovery BroJack <windswept@home.net> wrote:

Bullying is nothing new, but it takes on a new and ominous tone in
cyberspace. Adults are catching on.


Sounds like a bunch of anecdotal stories strung together to pressure
parents to invade their kids' private communications online.

There is no indication of the incidence of the problem in the general
population, and all the people quoted are clearly pushing an agenda.

Most definitely willful ignorance. Glaringly obvious.

Sure, I suppose a kid's schoolmates could hound him or her to suicide, but
how often does this happen, and do you really think we should give no one
under 18 any privacy at all because of a few sad stories?

.
User: "Eric Cordian"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 02 Jan 2005 11:14:52 PM
In alt.abuse.recovery James <James@removethis.whocares.org> wrote:

Most definitely willful ignorance. Glaringly obvious.

Your one trick pony act is beginning to bore.
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
.


User: "windswept"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 02 Jan 2005 09:41:59 PM
X-No-Archive: Yes
"Eric Cordian" <emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote in message
news:41d8b1ab$0$33777$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...

In alt.abuse.recovery BroJack <windswept@home.net> wrote:

Bullying is nothing new, but it takes on a new and ominous tone in
cyberspace. Adults are catching on.


Sounds like a bunch of anecdotal stories strung together to pressure
parents to invade their kids' private communications online.

There is no indication of the incidence of the problem in the general
population, and all the people quoted are clearly pushing an agenda.

Sure, I suppose a kid's schoolmates could hound him or her to suicide, but
how often does this happen, and do you really think we should give no one
under 18 any privacy at all because of a few sad stories?

There is a quilt in a room where teens answer a hotline - it grows larger by
the year - each year. Each square on that quilt is one more too many.


--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"

--
For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact:
help@asarian-host.net -- for all info about our server.
If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page:
https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi
.


User: "windswept"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 02 Jan 2005 08:37:09 PM
X-No-Archive: Yes
It goes on in every age group pretty much in the same manner. It just so
easy in this medium. A group finds a target and loses their compassion and
good sense.
I found this to be interesting and true:
"But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former victims who
use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors."What makes cyber
bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it can be, by and large,
anonymous."
I think everyone probably has a bully in them somewhere - most of the people
who indulge it on line are good people who just let that out and I don't
think they realize the extent of what they are doing because of the fact
that its a faceless and therefore often feelingless medium. I hope there is
more publicity regarding it. Its an awful experience both being either the
target and the perpetrator. I don't think anyone can honestly say they feel
good about inflicting pain on someone - but again - the problem with this
media is that you cannot see the pain. So it gets out of control.
"BroJack" <windswept@home.net> wrote in message
news:41d8a6b2.49367835@news-60.giganews.com...


http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/front/10545779.htm?1c
Posted on Sun, Jan. 02, 2005

High-tech harassment is hitting teens hard

Bullying is nothing new, but it takes on a new and ominous tone in
cyberspace. Adults are catching on.

By Leslie A. Pappas

Inquirer Staff Writer

Only after Ryan Halligan hanged himself did his father realize what
the 13-year-old had been doing online.

Through three months' worth of links and instant messages saved on his
home computer, Ryan's growing pain - and the callousness of his online
tormentors - became clear.

"You're a loser," one message jabbed. There were other taunts, Web
searches on suicide, and, ultimately, threats to kill himself to get
back at school bullies.

"Tonight's the night," Ryan finally typed.

"It's about time," the screen replied.

Bullying has been around forever, but modern technologies have both
broadened its venues and cloaked its practitioners.

Instant messaging, Web journals, cell phones and e-mail let bullies
chase victims into their homes, mock them anonymously, or slander them
schoolwide with a single mouse click.

There are few solid statistics about cyber bullying, but experts agree
that it is spreading.

"Cyber bullying is so new, people don't have a clue," said Bill
Belsey, who runs a Canadian Web site called cyberbullying.ca. Belsey
first heard of cyber bullying a few years ago in Asia and Scandinavia,
where mobile technologies were more advanced.

Since then, reports have spread, taking on new forms as technology
grows. Lagging behind are adults, who struggle to comprehend the
problem, let alone combat it.

Many parents focus on dangers from sexual predators and pornography
yet remain oblivious to much of their children's online world.
Educators, meanwhile, scramble to block elusive online threats before
they slip onto school grounds.

In Ryan's case, it was school problems that followed him home through
instant messages, deepening the bullying that had started during the
day. Ryan latched on to the idea of killing himself as vengeance
against those who had hurt him.

"He was on a mission to just make these kids feel bad," said his
father, John Halligan.

The father, though well-versed in technology, had no clue until it was
too late.

An IBM manager who built his own computers, Halligan, of Essex
Junction, Vt., thought he knew the risks of letting his son have a
computer in his bedroom. His ground rules were clear: no talking to
strangers, no sharing of passwords or personal information.

After Ryan's death on Oct. 7, 2003, Halligan logged on at his son's
computer and discovered a world he never knew existed.

Students with multiple screen names had left torrid messages that
Halligan struggled to decipher. Clicking on his son's saved Web links
led to online journals where sixth- and seventh-grade girls bragged of
sexual conquests. Other Web logs skewered classmates by exposing
intimate secrets culled from private cyber chats.

"These kids thought they had their own little private world and it was
their own playground where they could do whatever they wanted,"
Halligan said. "The problem is not just about pedophiles and
strangers, but how [youths are] treating each other."

Ted Feinberg, assistant executive director of the National Association
of School Psychologists in Bethesda, Md., said the goals of a cyber
bully differ little from those of the traditional, in-your-face bully:
"to torment, to intimidate, to frighten, to disparage."

But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former
victims who use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors.
"What makes cyber bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it
can be, by and large, anonymous. You don't know where the messages are
coming from."

Such was the case last month for a 15-year-old in Delaware County,
who, for safety reasons, didn't want her name or school identified.
Shortly after she switched from a private to a public school, her
parents received an unsigned e-mail from a newly created Yahoo!
account called [your_daughter]_is_headed_for_trouble.

"Your daughter... bragged about drinking and how she can ***** around
now that she's a public school girl... Maybe you can spend the tuition
you saved on therapy," the e-mail said.

"It just made us sick," the girl's mother said. "It was basically just
like throwing a bomb."

A school investigation turned up nothing. "This could have come from
anybody, anywhere," a school official told the girl's mother in an
e-mail.

"It made me feel incredibly attacked," said the girl, who suspects a
former classmate who had picked on her. "It was so incredibly untrue."

Defaming messages also pop up on the Web, often on free online teen
journals or blogging sites.

Earlier this month at Titus Elementary School in Warrington, Bucks
County, sixth graders listened intently to a story about Alex, a teen
in the county whose classmates created a Web site titled simply
"Reasons to Hate Alex."

Mary Worthington of the Network of Victim Assistance in Bucks County
said Alex agreed to share the story as part of a new cyber bully
training program, which was created for schools to meet a growing
demand.

Schools struggle with the issue because much of the Internet activity
that creates problems at school begins at home.

"I would encourage parents to be as close to Perry Mason as they can,"
said Linda Sember, assistant principal at Beverly Hills Middle School
in Upper Darby, Delaware County, who has responded to several cyber
bullying incidents over the last year, including one death threat that
prompted the school to summon police.

But many parents don't, or won't, pay enough attention, said Rachel
Simmons, author of Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in
Girls. As a result, the Internet - like lunchrooms, rest rooms and bus
stops - has become an unsupervised place where bullies can rule.

Parents "often use their ignorance of technology to excuse themselves
for not knowing what their children are doing when they're online,"
Simmons said. "What happens as a result of that attitude is that kids
have appropriated the Internet as this place that belongs to them -
with their own rules, their own language, their own justice."

Nancy Willard, executive director of the Center for Safe and
Responsible Internet Use, based in Eugene, Ore., agrees.

"The gap between parental understanding of what is going on online and
what children report is significant in every study," Willard said.
"Kids aren't telling their parents about what's happening online, and
parents aren't making it their business to find out."

Maria Burdsall, a mother of three boys in Warrington Township, is one
exception. She uses parental software to monitor her children's online
activity, frequently checking what sites they've visited or when
they've gone online.

Burdsall acknowledges that her vigilance has not been geared toward
cyber bullying. "What scares me," she said, is the prospect of her
kids "accidentally stumbling on a porn site."

But she has made it clear, especially to her 11-year-old, Michael,
that she's watching.

"He knows I can keep track," Burdsall said. "And he knows I mean
business."
(snip)

--
For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact:
help@asarian-host.net -- for all info about our server.
If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page:
https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi
.
User: "Eric Cordian"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 02 Jan 2005 08:55:18 PM
In alt.abuse.recovery windswept <windswept@asarian-host.net> wrote:

I think everyone probably has a bully in them somewhere - most of the people
who indulge it on line are good people who just let that out and I don't
think they realize the extent of what they are doing because of the fact
that its a faceless and therefore often feelingless medium. I hope there is
more publicity regarding it. Its an awful experience both being either the
target and the perpetrator. I don't think anyone can honestly say they feel
good about inflicting pain on someone - but again - the problem with this
media is that you cannot see the pain. So it gets out of control.

I think we just need to realize that in the final analysis, it's just
little zeros and ones, and the off switch is within reach anytime we need
a vacation from being insulted.
In a medium where any idea can instantly be heckled with 10 times the
bandwidth used to express it, thinking you are going to prevail against
your critics and "win" is a meaningless concept.
The real thing these kids need to learn is the art of leaving the computer
when it stops being fun. And of course, that hurting yourself to get back
at your enemies is a really bad strategic model.
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
.
User: "windswept"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 02 Jan 2005 09:40:19 PM
X-No-Archive: Yes
"Eric Cordian" <emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote in message
news:41d8b416$0$33776$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...

In alt.abuse.recovery windswept <windswept@asarian-host.net> wrote:

I think everyone probably has a bully in them somewhere - most of the

people

who indulge it on line are good people who just let that out and I don't
think they realize the extent of what they are doing because of the fact
that its a faceless and therefore often feelingless medium. I hope there

is

more publicity regarding it. Its an awful experience both being either

the

target and the perpetrator. I don't think anyone can honestly say they

feel

good about inflicting pain on someone - but again - the problem with

this

media is that you cannot see the pain. So it gets out of control.


I think we just need to realize that in the final analysis, it's just
little zeros and ones, and the off switch is within reach anytime we need
a vacation from being insulted.

I think thats a big part of the problem little zeros and ones have no
emotions or empathy - people do. Sometimes those things get confused.
Maybe if one of those creepy hands like in Zelda came out and swatted the
person upside the head when the bullying starts - they'd think twice about
doing it or joining in.


In a medium where any idea can instantly be heckled with 10 times the
bandwidth used to express it, thinking you are going to prevail against
your critics and "win" is a meaningless concept.

Well I think we establish early on the other thread - that right thing is a
thing that will keep a person in a conflict Whats right to one ain't to
another. Needing to be right becomes a meaningless pursuit.


The real thing these kids need to learn is the art of leaving the computer
when it stops being fun.

Not just kids - look around, adults have been doing it here for years.
And of course, that hurting yourself to get back

at your enemies is a really bad strategic model

If only those words could be programed into folks at birth.


--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"

--
For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact:
help@asarian-host.net -- for all info about our server.
If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page:
https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi
.


User: "Liz "

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 05:28:35 AM
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:37:09 GMT, windswept
<windswept@asarian-host.net> wrote:
Blah blah...crap crap blah...anything I do is ok...crap blah
~*~ I am incredibly silly, so I emphasize you. My tropical liaison won't improve before I say it ~*~
.

User: "tempest"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 12:09:37 AM
X-No-Archive: Yes
"windswept" <windswept@asarian-host.net> wrote in message
news:b8a529c39e686.ebd9d28388b7a5bbb367@asarian-host.net...


It goes on in every age group pretty much in the same manner. It just so
easy in this medium. A group finds a target and loses their compassion

and

good sense.

I found this to be interesting and true:

"But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former victims

who

use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors."What makes cyber
bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it can be, by and large,
anonymous."

I think everyone probably has a bully in them somewhere - most of the

people

who indulge it on line are good people who just let that out and I don't
think they realize the extent of what they are doing because of the fact
that its a faceless and therefore often feelingless medium. I hope there

is

more publicity regarding it. Its an awful experience both being either

the

target and the perpetrator. I don't think anyone can honestly say they

feel

good about inflicting pain on someone - but again - the problem with this
media is that you cannot see the pain. So it gets out of control.

I disagree. I think that there is this misconception in a lot of people
that online life is separate from real life. I think there is a tendency to
lean towards "anything goes" because there are no "consequences", whereas
in real life, there would be consequences and accountability. I think that
there needs to be an "owning of words" put on the net, a "personalising" of
what is said.



"BroJack" <windswept@home.net> wrote in message
news:41d8a6b2.49367835@news-60.giganews.com...


http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/front/10545779.htm?1c
Posted on Sun, Jan. 02, 2005

High-tech harassment is hitting teens hard

Bullying is nothing new, but it takes on a new and ominous tone in
cyberspace. Adults are catching on.

By Leslie A. Pappas

Inquirer Staff Writer

Only after Ryan Halligan hanged himself did his father realize what
the 13-year-old had been doing online.

Through three months' worth of links and instant messages saved on his
home computer, Ryan's growing pain - and the callousness of his online
tormentors - became clear.

"You're a loser," one message jabbed. There were other taunts, Web
searches on suicide, and, ultimately, threats to kill himself to get
back at school bullies.

"Tonight's the night," Ryan finally typed.

"It's about time," the screen replied.

Bullying has been around forever, but modern technologies have both
broadened its venues and cloaked its practitioners.

Instant messaging, Web journals, cell phones and e-mail let bullies
chase victims into their homes, mock them anonymously, or slander them
schoolwide with a single mouse click.

There are few solid statistics about cyber bullying, but experts agree
that it is spreading.

"Cyber bullying is so new, people don't have a clue," said Bill
Belsey, who runs a Canadian Web site called cyberbullying.ca. Belsey
first heard of cyber bullying a few years ago in Asia and Scandinavia,
where mobile technologies were more advanced.

Since then, reports have spread, taking on new forms as technology
grows. Lagging behind are adults, who struggle to comprehend the
problem, let alone combat it.

Many parents focus on dangers from sexual predators and pornography
yet remain oblivious to much of their children's online world.
Educators, meanwhile, scramble to block elusive online threats before
they slip onto school grounds.

In Ryan's case, it was school problems that followed him home through
instant messages, deepening the bullying that had started during the
day. Ryan latched on to the idea of killing himself as vengeance
against those who had hurt him.

"He was on a mission to just make these kids feel bad," said his
father, John Halligan.

The father, though well-versed in technology, had no clue until it was
too late.

An IBM manager who built his own computers, Halligan, of Essex
Junction, Vt., thought he knew the risks of letting his son have a
computer in his bedroom. His ground rules were clear: no talking to
strangers, no sharing of passwords or personal information.

After Ryan's death on Oct. 7, 2003, Halligan logged on at his son's
computer and discovered a world he never knew existed.

Students with multiple screen names had left torrid messages that
Halligan struggled to decipher. Clicking on his son's saved Web links
led to online journals where sixth- and seventh-grade girls bragged of
sexual conquests. Other Web logs skewered classmates by exposing
intimate secrets culled from private cyber chats.

"These kids thought they had their own little private world and it was
their own playground where they could do whatever they wanted,"
Halligan said. "The problem is not just about pedophiles and
strangers, but how [youths are] treating each other."

Ted Feinberg, assistant executive director of the National Association
of School Psychologists in Bethesda, Md., said the goals of a cyber
bully differ little from those of the traditional, in-your-face bully:
"to torment, to intimidate, to frighten, to disparage."

But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former
victims who use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors.
"What makes cyber bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it
can be, by and large, anonymous. You don't know where the messages are
coming from."

Such was the case last month for a 15-year-old in Delaware County,
who, for safety reasons, didn't want her name or school identified.
Shortly after she switched from a private to a public school, her
parents received an unsigned e-mail from a newly created Yahoo!
account called [your_daughter]_is_headed_for_trouble.

"Your daughter... bragged about drinking and how she can ***** around
now that she's a public school girl... Maybe you can spend the tuition
you saved on therapy," the e-mail said.

"It just made us sick," the girl's mother said. "It was basically just
like throwing a bomb."

A school investigation turned up nothing. "This could have come from
anybody, anywhere," a school official told the girl's mother in an
e-mail.

"It made me feel incredibly attacked," said the girl, who suspects a
former classmate who had picked on her. "It was so incredibly untrue."

Defaming messages also pop up on the Web, often on free online teen
journals or blogging sites.

Earlier this month at Titus Elementary School in Warrington, Bucks
County, sixth graders listened intently to a story about Alex, a teen
in the county whose classmates created a Web site titled simply
"Reasons to Hate Alex."

Mary Worthington of the Network of Victim Assistance in Bucks County
said Alex agreed to share the story as part of a new cyber bully
training program, which was created for schools to meet a growing
demand.

Schools struggle with the issue because much of the Internet activity
that creates problems at school begins at home.

"I would encourage parents to be as close to Perry Mason as they can,"
said Linda Sember, assistant principal at Beverly Hills Middle School
in Upper Darby, Delaware County, who has responded to several cyber
bullying incidents over the last year, including one death threat that
prompted the school to summon police.

But many parents don't, or won't, pay enough attention, said Rachel
Simmons, author of Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in
Girls. As a result, the Internet - like lunchrooms, rest rooms and bus
stops - has become an unsupervised place where bullies can rule.

Parents "often use their ignorance of technology to excuse themselves
for not knowing what their children are doing when they're online,"
Simmons said. "What happens as a result of that attitude is that kids
have appropriated the Internet as this place that belongs to them -
with their own rules, their own language, their own justice."

Nancy Willard, executive director of the Center for Safe and
Responsible Internet Use, based in Eugene, Ore., agrees.

"The gap between parental understanding of what is going on online and
what children report is significant in every study," Willard said.
"Kids aren't telling their parents about what's happening online, and
parents aren't making it their business to find out."

Maria Burdsall, a mother of three boys in Warrington Township, is one
exception. She uses parental software to monitor her children's online
activity, frequently checking what sites they've visited or when
they've gone online.

Burdsall acknowledges that her vigilance has not been geared toward
cyber bullying. "What scares me," she said, is the prospect of her
kids "accidentally stumbling on a porn site."

But she has made it clear, especially to her 11-year-old, Michael,
that she's watching.

"He knows I can keep track," Burdsall said. "And he knows I mean
business."
(snip


--
For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact:
help@asarian-host.net -- for all info about our server.
If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page:
https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi
.
User: "satyagrahas"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 03:30:13 AM
"tempest" <tempest@asarian-host.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
d9aaa9ebded.0b571d59f999e1ddb43e55@asarian-host.net...

X-No-Archive: Yes

"windswept" <windswept@asarian-host.net> wrote in message
news:b8a529c39e686.ebd9d28388b7a5bbb367@asarian-host.net...


It goes on in every age group pretty much in the same manner. It just

so

easy in this medium. A group finds a target and loses their compassion

and

good sense.

I found this to be interesting and true:

"But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former victims

who

use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors."What makes

cyber

bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it can be, by and

large,

anonymous."

I think everyone probably has a bully in them somewhere - most of the

people

who indulge it on line are good people who just let that out and I don't
think they realize the extent of what they are doing because of the fact
that its a faceless and therefore often feelingless medium. I hope there

is

more publicity regarding it. Its an awful experience both being either

the

target and the perpetrator. I don't think anyone can honestly say they

feel

good about inflicting pain on someone - but again - the problem with

this

media is that you cannot see the pain. So it gets out of control.


I disagree. I think that there is this misconception in a lot of people
that online life is separate from real life. I think there is a tendency

to

lean towards "anything goes" because there are no "consequences", whereas
in real life, there would be consequences and accountability. I think

that

there needs to be an "owning of words" put on the net, a "personalising"

of

what is said.

i agree with you, i find it still a bit "strange" that the "social
normalisation" that usually occur spontaneously in real life and regulate
intercommunications has so much difficulties to be operative online. i only
hope that with time the regulation will show its nose, but yet i have seen
being operative in some places better than in others...
satya
.

User: "Eric Cordian"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 12:38:37 AM
In alt.abuse.recovery tempest <tempest@asarian-host.net> wrote:

I disagree. I think that there is this misconception in a lot of people
that online life is separate from real life. I think there is a tendency to
lean towards "anything goes" because there are no "consequences", whereas
in real life, there would be consequences and accountability. I think that
there needs to be an "owning of words" put on the net, a "personalising" of
what is said.

That's certainly the camel's nose, and most of the rest of the camel as
well, into the tent.
This country was founded on the notion of anonymous political speech,
where people could say anything, without fear of consequences.
Let's not apply to the Net standards which do not apply to other
equivalent and comparable things. This is the way regulations and control
tend to sneak into society, as new things replace old, and the safeguards
that the old things had are not implemented for the new.
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
.
User: "James"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 01:10:02 AM
On 03 Jan 2005 06:38:37 GMT, Eric Cordian
<emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote in message
<41d8e86d$0$33779$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org> the following:

In alt.abuse.recovery tempest <tempest@asarian-host.net> wrote:

I disagree. I think that there is this misconception in a lot of people
that online life is separate from real life. I think there is a tendency to
lean towards "anything goes" because there are no "consequences", whereas
in real life, there would be consequences and accountability. I think that
there needs to be an "owning of words" put on the net, a "personalising" of
what is said.


That's certainly the camel's nose, and most of the rest of the camel as
well, into the tent.

This country was founded on the notion of anonymous political speech,

You don't have clue #1 about what you're talking about, and
that's about how many references you can provide as well...
not even #1.

where people could say anything, without fear of consequences.

That never has been the case... take note of the
Constitution and the Law.

Let's not apply to the Net standards which do not apply to other
equivalent and comparable things. This is the way regulations and control
tend to sneak into society, as new things replace old, and the safeguards
that the old things had are not implemented for the new.

.
User: "Eric Cordian"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 02:25:13 AM
In alt.abuse.recovery James <James@removethis.whocares.org> wrote:

This country was founded on the notion of anonymous political speech,

You don't have clue #1 about what you're talking about, and
that's about how many references you can provide as well...
not even #1.

Well, it looks like James needs a legal lesson.
The Supreme Court has held that the right to anonymous speech is
guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Examples that the state cannot force speakers to identify themselves are
numerous. To list a few.
The state cannot force political literature to be signed by its author.
The state cannot force door to door canvassers to register.
Non-political uses of the right to anonymity also abound, in areas such as
monitoring human rights abuses, discussion of minority sexual
orientations, and even exposing government waste and fraud, or identifying
corporate polluters of the environment.
James is using his right to anonymity when he posts his articles here,
since we don't know his real name, address, phone number, employer, or the
names of his neighbors, and he doesn't have to worry we will do something
that will cause him to lose his job and be evicted if he says something we
disagree with.
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
.


User: "Charles"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 12:56:41 AM
On 03 Jan 2005 06:38:37 GMT, Eric Cordian
<emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote:

In alt.abuse.recovery tempest <tempest@asarian-host.net> wrote:

I disagree. I think that there is this misconception in a lot of people
that online life is separate from real life. I think there is a tendency to
lean towards "anything goes" because there are no "consequences", whereas
in real life, there would be consequences and accountability. I think that
there needs to be an "owning of words" put on the net, a "personalising" of
what is said.


That's certainly the camel's nose, and most of the rest of the camel as
well, into the tent.

This country was founded on the notion of anonymous political speech,
where people could say anything, without fear of consequences.

I am curious about this, it's an assertion I've never heard before.
Which country are you revering to?
If the US, I doubt there was anonymity then as we know it now.
It sounds like you are espousing freedom from responsibility, that is
a rather new development I believe.
I could be wrong, it's just what you are saying here is quite
different from anything I've heard before.
-Charles
-"...overqualified for a life of leisure."
.
User: "Eric Cordian"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 02:12:45 AM
In alt.abuse.recovery Charles <ckraft@west.net> wrote:

It sounds like you are espousing freedom from responsibility, that is
a rather new development I believe.

One should take responsibility for actions. That is far different than
accepting abuse and harrassment for stating ideas and opinions others
might not agree with.
The right of anonymous political speech goes back to the early days of the
United States. You may recall that the Federalist Papers were distributed
under the nym "Publius."
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
.
User: "Rhiannon"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 05 Jan 2005 06:04:52 PM
"Eric Cordian" <emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote in message
news:41d8fe7d$0$33782$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...

In alt.abuse.recovery Charles <ckraft@west.net> wrote:

It sounds like you are espousing freedom from responsibility, that is
a rather new development I believe.


One should take responsibility for actions. That is far different than
accepting abuse and harrassment for stating ideas and opinions others
might not agree with.

Speech IS an action. Say bomb in an Airport and see how "free" your speech
is.
.
User: "Eric Cordian"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 05 Jan 2005 11:01:00 PM
In alt.abuse.recovery Rhiannon <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote:

One should take responsibility for actions. That is far different than
accepting abuse and harrassment for stating ideas and opinions others
might not agree with.

Speech IS an action. Say bomb in an Airport and see how "free" your speech
is.

We distinguish speech which causes iminent danger. You can't scream
"Sarin" in a crowded nightclub with locked exit doors, or direct a blind
person to walk in front of an oncoming train.
However, most speech doesn't pose such an iminent threat, and people
should be free to express themselves without having to fear violence from
those wishing to quash their opinions.
To this end, anonymous speech is and always has been a basic
Constitutional right, and any attempt to change this should be viewed with
great suspicion.
I saw an interesting example of mean speech on the Daily Show last night.
They had a list which they called "Rank of Favorite Teenage Activities"
which went as follows...
1. Smoking Pot
2. Masturbating
3. Smoking Pot while Masturbating
4. Getting more Pot
5. Rolling the Pot
6. Smoking more Pot
7. Finding a Snack
8. Eating the Snack
9. Now I'm Thirsty
10. Find a Drink
11. Drink it
12. Masturbate again
13. Smoking more Pot
14. Finding a Snack
15. Eating the Snack
etc, ad nauseum
Now of course, teens are always a wonderful target for this kind of abuse,
because they can't fight back. I was thinking, however, how much heat the
Daily Show would have generated for themselves, had they chosen to
stereotype African-Americans, instead of teens.
Favorite Activities of African-American Males
1. Having some *****
2. Eating watermelon
3. Having some ***** while eating watermelon
4. Finding some crack
5. Smoking the crack
6. Calling in sick to work.
7. Finding a warm place to *****
8. Eating fried chicken
9. ***** again
10. More watermelon
11. Finding some crack
etc
Now, we all know perfectly well that if Jon Stewart had characterized
black guys as lazy crack-smoking watermelon-eating fornicators, instead of
teens as hungry pot-smoking masturbators, the president of Comedy Central
would be calling a press conference to announce his firing, as crowds of
irate black people overturned cars and set them on fire outside the
studio.
Still, I would support Jon Stewart's right to free speech, and even
anonymous speech, and put the blame 100% on the people who chose to
misbehave because they didn't like the content.
That having been said, I still think it was a cheap shot at young people
unworthy of the Daily Show.
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
.
User: "Rhiannon"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 06 Jan 2005 10:14:06 AM
"Eric Cordian" <emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote in message
news:41dcc60c$0$66996$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...

In alt.abuse.recovery Rhiannon <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote:

One should take responsibility for actions. That is far different than

accepting abuse and harrassment > >> > for stating ideas and opinions others
might not agree with.

Speech IS an action. Say bomb in an Airport and see how "free" your

speech is.

We distinguish speech which causes iminent danger.

Right. Which clearly limits free speech. We - in Canada - take that a step
further and under hate crime laws distinguish speech which promotes racism
or hatred against an individual or group of colour, creed, culture,
religious belief, gender, and sexual orientation - again, clearly limiting
free speech. In other words, no speech is entirely free, nor should it be,
and if the law has to draw a line somewhere, we choose to draw it when the
rights of the individual infringe on the rights of the whole. As a writer
and an artist, I support free speech and freedom of expression but have no
problem working within clear boundaries and limitations.
You must just hate the patriot act.
Oh, btw, my teenage sons love you now. ;)
rhianon@sympatico.ca

Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"

.

User: "lovetap"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 05 Jan 2005 11:53:04 PM
The only reason John Stewart would be fired if he said that about black
people would be because he was stealing Dave Chapelle's material.
.
User: "Eric Cordian"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 06 Jan 2005 01:01:41 AM
lovetap <dr.lovetap@gmail.com> wrote:

The only reason John Stewart would be fired if he said that about black
people would be because he was stealing Dave Chapelle's material.

Black people have immunity when it comes to offensive humor about other
black people.
Besides, Dave Chapelle's material is usually more funny than offensive.
If he did stuff whose only purpose was to put people down, he would be
jobless fast.
Dave's stuff is hilarious, especially that sketch about a family with a
very unusual last name. :)
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
.
User: "lovetap"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 06 Jan 2005 01:18:44 AM
Eric Cordian wrote:

lovetap <dr.lovetap@gmail.com> wrote:

The only reason John Stewart would be fired if he said that about

black

people would be because he was stealing Dave Chapelle's material.


Black people have immunity when it comes to offensive humor about

other

black people.

Besides, Dave Chapelle's material is usually more funny than

offensive.

If he did stuff whose only purpose was to put people down, he would

be

jobless fast.

Dave's stuff is hilarious, especially that sketch about a family with

a

very unusual last name. :)

I love Dave Chappelle and his comedic sense. I especially like the way
he cracks up at his own jokes. :D
I think my favorite skits are the ones about the Playa Haters... where
Charlie Murphy plays the character "Buck Nasty." I swear I laugh myself
to tears whenever I see one of those episodes. He's the spitting image
of a friend of mine.
.





User: "tempest"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 01:25:54 PM
X-No-Archive: Yes
"Eric Cordian" <emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote in message
news:41d8fe7d$0$33782$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...

In alt.abuse.recovery Charles <ckraft@west.net> wrote:

It sounds like you are espousing freedom from responsibility, that is
a rather new development I believe.


One should take responsibility for actions. That is far different than
accepting abuse and harrassment for stating ideas and opinions others
might not agree with.

Maybe I need to re-read my post and c where I put in that accepting abuse
and harrassment for statings ideas and opinions others might not agree with
was? whew - wotta mouthful.


The right of anonymous political speech goes back to the early days of the
United States. You may recall that the Federalist Papers were distributed
under the nym "Publius."

I do not fall under the United states constitution.

--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"

--
For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact:
help@asarian-host.net -- for all info about our server.
If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page:
https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi
.



User: "tempest"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 01:23:57 PM
X-No-Archive: Yes
"Eric Cordian" <emc@artifact.psychedelic.net> wrote in message
news:41d8e86d$0$33779$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...

In alt.abuse.recovery tempest <tempest@asarian-host.net> wrote:

I disagree. I think that there is this misconception in a lot of people
that online life is separate from real life. I think there is a

tendency to

lean towards "anything goes" because there are no "consequences",

whereas

in real life, there would be consequences and accountability. I think

that

there needs to be an "owning of words" put on the net, a "personalising"

of

what is said.


That's certainly the camel's nose, and most of the rest of the camel as
well, into the tent.

Then I need to have a rather big tent to fit a camel in to. ;)


This country was founded on the notion of anonymous political speech,
where people could say anything, without fear of consequences.

Which country might that be?


Let's not apply to the Net standards which do not apply to other
equivalent and comparable things. This is the way regulations and control
tend to sneak into society, as new things replace old, and the safeguards
that the old things had are not implemented for the new.

Um okay.


--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"

--
For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact:
help@asarian-host.net -- for all info about our server.
If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page:
https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi
.


User: "Liz "

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 05:33:20 AM
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 06:09:37 GMT, tempest <tempest@asarian-host.net>
wrote:

X-No-Archive: Yes

"windswept" <windswept@asarian-host.net> wrote in message
news:b8a529c39e686.ebd9d28388b7a5bbb367@asarian-host.net...


It goes on in every age group pretty much in the same manner. It just so
easy in this medium. A group finds a target and loses their compassion

and

good sense.

I found this to be interesting and true:

"But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former victims

who

use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors."What makes cyber
bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it can be, by and large,
anonymous."

I think everyone probably has a bully in them somewhere - most of the

people

who indulge it on line are good people who just let that out and I don't
think they realize the extent of what they are doing because of the fact
that its a faceless and therefore often feelingless medium. I hope there

is

more publicity regarding it. Its an awful experience both being either

the

target and the perpetrator. I don't think anyone can honestly say they

feel

good about inflicting pain on someone - but again - the problem with this
media is that you cannot see the pain. So it gets out of control.


I disagree. I think that there is this misconception in a lot of people
that online life is separate from real life. I think there is a tendency to
lean towards "anything goes" because there are no "consequences", whereas
in real life, there would be consequences and accountability. I think that
there needs to be an "owning of words" put on the net, a "personalising" of
what is said.

I think that what is written on the internet should be subject to the
same prosecution as anything said offline. When that happens, the net
will be a scuttering exodus for a while and then it will get very
quiet.





"BroJack" <windswept@home.net> wrote in message
news:41d8a6b2.49367835@news-60.giganews.com...


http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/front/10545779.htm?1c
Posted on Sun, Jan. 02, 2005

High-tech harassment is hitting teens hard

Bullying is nothing new, but it takes on a new and ominous tone in
cyberspace. Adults are catching on.

By Leslie A. Pappas

Inquirer Staff Writer

Only after Ryan Halligan hanged himself did his father realize what
the 13-year-old had been doing online.

Through three months' worth of links and instant messages saved on his
home computer, Ryan's growing pain - and the callousness of his online
tormentors - became clear.

"You're a loser," one message jabbed. There were other taunts, Web
searches on suicide, and, ultimately, threats to kill himself to get
back at school bullies.

"Tonight's the night," Ryan finally typed.

"It's about time," the screen replied.

Bullying has been around forever, but modern technologies have both
broadened its venues and cloaked its practitioners.

Instant messaging, Web journals, cell phones and e-mail let bullies
chase victims into their homes, mock them anonymously, or slander them
schoolwide with a single mouse click.

There are few solid statistics about cyber bullying, but experts agree
that it is spreading.

"Cyber bullying is so new, people don't have a clue," said Bill
Belsey, who runs a Canadian Web site called cyberbullying.ca. Belsey
first heard of cyber bullying a few years ago in Asia and Scandinavia,
where mobile technologies were more advanced.

Since then, reports have spread, taking on new forms as technology
grows. Lagging behind are adults, who struggle to comprehend the
problem, let alone combat it.

Many parents focus on dangers from sexual predators and pornography
yet remain oblivious to much of their children's online world.
Educators, meanwhile, scramble to block elusive online threats before
they slip onto school grounds.

In Ryan's case, it was school problems that followed him home through
instant messages, deepening the bullying that had started during the
day. Ryan latched on to the idea of killing himself as vengeance
against those who had hurt him.

"He was on a mission to just make these kids feel bad," said his
father, John Halligan.

The father, though well-versed in technology, had no clue until it was
too late.

An IBM manager who built his own computers, Halligan, of Essex
Junction, Vt., thought he knew the risks of letting his son have a
computer in his bedroom. His ground rules were clear: no talking to
strangers, no sharing of passwords or personal information.

After Ryan's death on Oct. 7, 2003, Halligan logged on at his son's
computer and discovered a world he never knew existed.

Students with multiple screen names had left torrid messages that
Halligan struggled to decipher. Clicking on his son's saved Web links
led to online journals where sixth- and seventh-grade girls bragged of
sexual conquests. Other Web logs skewered classmates by exposing
intimate secrets culled from private cyber chats.

"These kids thought they had their own little private world and it was
their own playground where they could do whatever they wanted,"
Halligan said. "The problem is not just about pedophiles and
strangers, but how [youths are] treating each other."

Ted Feinberg, assistant executive director of the National Association
of School Psychologists in Bethesda, Md., said the goals of a cyber
bully differ little from those of the traditional, in-your-face bully:
"to torment, to intimidate, to frighten, to disparage."

But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former
victims who use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors.
"What makes cyber bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it
can be, by and large, anonymous. You don't know where the messages are
coming from."

Such was the case last month for a 15-year-old in Delaware County,
who, for safety reasons, didn't want her name or school identified.
Shortly after she switched from a private to a public school, her
parents received an unsigned e-mail from a newly created Yahoo!
account called [your_daughter]_is_headed_for_trouble.

"Your daughter... bragged about drinking and how she can ***** around
now that she's a public school girl... Maybe you can spend the tuition
you saved on therapy," the e-mail said.

"It just made us sick," the girl's mother said. "It was basically just
like throwing a bomb."

A school investigation turned up nothing. "This could have come from
anybody, anywhere," a school official told the girl's mother in an
e-mail.

"It made me feel incredibly attacked," said the girl, who suspects a
former classmate who had picked on her. "It was so incredibly untrue."

Defaming messages also pop up on the Web, often on free online teen
journals or blogging sites.

Earlier this month at Titus Elementary School in Warrington, Bucks
County, sixth graders listened intently to a story about Alex, a teen
in the county whose classmates created a Web site titled simply
"Reasons to Hate Alex."

Mary Worthington of the Network of Victim Assistance in Bucks County
said Alex agreed to share the story as part of a new cyber bully
training program, which was created for schools to meet a growing
demand.

Schools struggle with the issue because much of the Internet activity
that creates problems at school begins at home.

"I would encourage parents to be as close to Perry Mason as they can,"
said Linda Sember, assistant principal at Beverly Hills Middle School
in Upper Darby, Delaware County, who has responded to several cyber
bullying incidents over the last year, including one death threat that
prompted the school to summon police.

But many parents don't, or won't, pay enough attention, said Rachel
Simmons, author of Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in
Girls. As a result, the Internet - like lunchrooms, rest rooms and bus
stops - has become an unsupervised place where bullies can rule.

Parents "often use their ignorance of technology to excuse themselves
for not knowing what their children are doing when they're online,"
Simmons said. "What happens as a result of that attitude is that kids
have appropriated the Internet as this place that belongs to them -
with their own rules, their own language, their own justice."

Nancy Willard, executive director of the Center for Safe and
Responsible Internet Use, based in Eugene, Ore., agrees.

"The gap between parental understanding of what is going on online and
what children report is significant in every study," Willard said.
"Kids aren't telling their parents about what's happening online, and
parents aren't making it their business to find out."

Maria Burdsall, a mother of three boys in Warrington Township, is one
exception. She uses parental software to monitor her children's online
activity, frequently checking what sites they've visited or when
they've gone online.

Burdsall acknowledges that her vigilance has not been geared toward
cyber bullying. "What scares me," she said, is the prospect of her
kids "accidentally stumbling on a porn site."

But she has made it clear, especially to her 11-year-old, Michael,
that she's watching.

"He knows I can keep track," Burdsall said. "And he knows I mean
business."
(snip



~*~ I am incredibly silly, so I emphasize you. My tropical liaison won't improve before I say it ~*~
.

User: "windswept"

Title: Re: Flame Wars Can Kill You, Via Suicide 03 Jan 2005 01:09:03 AM
X-No-Archive: Yes
"tempest" <tempest@asarian-host.net> wrote in message
news:d9aaa9ebded.0b571d59f999e1ddb43e55@asarian-host.net...


"windswept" <windswept@asarian-host.net> wrote in message
news:b8a529c39e686.ebd9d28388b7a5bbb367@asarian-host.net...

It goes on in every age group pretty much in the same manner. It just so
easy in this medium. A group finds a target and loses their compassion

and

good sense.

I found this to be interesting and true:

"But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former victims
who use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors."What makes
cyber bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it can be, by

and

large, anonymous."

I think everyone probably has a bully in them somewhere - most of the
people who indulge it on line are good people who just let that out and

I

don't think they realize the extent of what they are doing because of

the

fact that its a faceless and therefore often feelingless medium. I hope
there is more publicity regarding it. Its an awful experience both being
either the target and the perpetrator. I don't think anyone can honestly
say they feel good about inflicting pain on someone - but again - the
problem with this media is that you cannot see the pain. So it gets out

of

control.


I disagree. I think that there is this misconception in a lot of people
that online life is separate from real life.

I definitely feel there is - for me at least and probably various people
view it differently at different times in their life. There have been times
when on line contact was what kept going and also kept me in touch with
another living being. The beginning Fibro years come to mind.
Now my days are chock full busy and my mind is more out my door instead of
in front of the puter. When that happens the two seem more disconnected.
I think there is a tendency to

lean towards "anything goes" because there are no "consequences", whereas
in real life, there would be consequences and accountability. I think that
there needs to be an "owning of words" put on the net, a "personalizing"

of

what is said.

I think we pretty much agree on what is major difference between the two. I
think a lot of the consequences in real life have to do with the real time
impact your words have. You learn to own them there quite quickly because
you instantly see the results. You could say something on line that would
prompt someone to take to their bed with the covers over their head for a
week and never know it. I've been trying lately to keep my online exchanges
on a parallel with the off line ones. Not always successful at that but I'm
working on it.
I think the anonymity of the net is both its curse and blessing.


"BroJack" <windswept@home.net> wrote in message
news:41d8a6b2.49367835@news-60.giganews.com...



http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/front/10545779.htm?1c Posted

on

Sun, Jan. 02, 2005

High-tech harassment is hitting teens hard

Bullying is nothing new, but it takes on a new and ominous tone in
cyberspace. Adults are catching on.

By Leslie A. Pappas

Inquirer Staff Writer

Only after Ryan Halligan hanged himself did his father realize what

the

13-year-old had been doing online.

Through three months' worth of links and instant messages saved on his
home computer, Ryan's growing pain - and the callousness of his online
tormentors - became clear.

"You're a loser," one message jabbed. There were other taunts, Web
searches on suicide, and, ultimately, threats to kill himself to get
back at school bullies.

"Tonight's the night," Ryan finally typed.

"It's about time," the screen replied.

Bullying has been around forever, but modern technologies have both
broadened its venues and cloaked its practitioners.

Instant messaging, Web journals, cell phones and e-mail let bullies
chase victims into their homes, mock them anonymously, or slander them
schoolwide with a single mouse click.

There are few solid statistics about cyber bullying, but experts agree
that it is spreading.

"Cyber bullying is so new, people don't have a clue," said Bill
Belsey, who runs a Canadian Web site called cyberbullying.ca. Belsey
first heard of cyber bullying a few years ago in Asia and Scandinavia,
where mobile technologies were more advanced.

Since then, reports have spread, taking on new forms as technology
grows. Lagging behind are adults, who struggle to comprehend the
problem, let alone combat it.

Many parents focus on dangers from sexual predators and pornography
yet remain oblivious to much of their children's online world.
Educators, meanwhile, scramble to block elusive online threats before
they slip onto school grounds.

In Ryan's case, it was school problems that followed him home through
instant messages, deepening the bullying that had started during the
day. Ryan latched on to the idea of killing himself as vengeance
against those who had hurt him.

"He was on a mission to just make these kids feel bad," said his

father,

John Halligan.

The father, though well-versed in technology, had no clue until it was
too late.

An IBM manager who built his own computers, Halligan, of Essex
Junction, Vt., thought he knew the risks of letting his son have a
computer in his bedroom. His ground rules were clear: no talking to
strangers, no sharing of passwords or personal information.

After Ryan's death on Oct. 7, 2003, Halligan logged on at his son's
computer and discovered a world he never knew existed.

Students with multiple screen names had left torrid messages that
Halligan struggled to decipher. Clicking on his son's saved Web links
led to online journals where sixth- and seventh-grade girls bragged of
sexual conquests. Other Web logs skewered classmates by exposing
intimate secrets culled from private cyber chats.

"These kids thought they had their own little private world and it was
their own playground where they could do whatever they wanted,"
Halligan said. "The problem is not just about pedophiles and
strangers, but how [youths are] treating each other."

Ted Feinberg, assistant executive director of the National Association
of School Psychologists in Bethesda, Md., said the goals of a cyber
bully differ little from those of the traditional, in-your-face bully:
"to torment, to intimidate, to frighten, to disparage."

But the safety of a computer screen can embolden even those who are
otherwise meek, he said. In fact, many cyber bullies are former
victims who use the computer to turn the tables on their tormentors.
"What makes cyber bullying more insidious," Feinberg said, "is that it
can be, by and large, anonymous. You don't know where the messages are
coming from."

Such was the case last month for a 15-year-old in Delaware County,
who, for safety reasons, didn't want her name or school identified.
Shortly after she switched from a private to a public school, her
parents received an unsigned e-mail from a newly created Yahoo!
account called [your_daughter]_is_headed_for_trouble.

"Your daughter... bragged about drinking and how she can ***** around
now that she's a public school girl... Maybe you can spend the tuition
you saved on therapy," the e-mail said.

"It just made us sick," the girl's mother said. "It was basically just
like throwing a bomb."

A school investigation turned up nothing. "This could have come from
anybody, anywhere," a school official told the girl's mother in an
e-mail.

"It made me feel incredibly attacked," said the girl, who suspects a
former classmate who had picked on her. "It was so incredibly untrue."

Defaming messages also pop up on the Web, often on free online teen
journals or blogging sites.

Earlier this month at Titus Elementary School in Warrington, Bucks
County, sixth graders listened intently to a story about Alex, a teen
in the county whose classmates created a Web site titled simply
"Reasons to Hate Alex."

Mary Worthington of the Network of Victim Assistance in Bucks County
said Alex agreed to share the story as part of a new cyber bully
training program, which was created for schools to meet a growing
demand.

Schools struggle with the issue because much of the Internet activity
that creates problems at school begins at home.

"I would encourage parents to be as close to Perry Mason as they can,"
said Linda Sember, assistant principal at Beverly Hills Middle School
in Upper Darby, Delaware County, who has responded to several cyber
bullying incidents over the last year, including one death threat that
prompted the school to summon police.

But many parents don't, or won't, pay enough attention, said Rachel
Simmons, author of Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in
Girls. As a result, the Internet - like lunchrooms, rest rooms and bus
stops - has become an unsupervised place where bullies can rule.

Parents "often use their ignorance of technology to excuse themselves
for not knowing what their children are doing when they're online,"
Simmons said. "What happens as a result of that attitude is that kids
have appropriated the Internet as this place that belongs to them -
with their own rules, their own language, their own justice."

Nancy Willard, executive director of the Center for Safe and
Responsible Internet Use, based in Eugene, Ore., agrees.

"The gap between parental understanding of what is going on online and
what children report is significant in every study," Willard said.
"Kids aren't telling their parents about what's happening online, and
parents aren't making it their business to find out."

Maria Burdsall, a mother of three boys in Warrington Township, is one
exception. She uses parental software to monitor her children's online
activity, frequently checking what sites they've visited or when
they've gone online.

Burdsall acknowledges that her vigilance has not been geared toward
cyber bullying. "What scares me," she said, is the prospect of her
kids "accidentally stumbling on a porn site."

But she has made it clear, especially to her 11-year-old, Michael,

that

she's watching.

"He knows I can keep track," Burdsall said. "And he knows I mean
business." (snip



--
For more information about this NNTP posting service, contact:
help@asarian-host.net -- for all info about our server.
If you want an anonymous account, visit our sign-up page:
https://asarian-host.net/cgi-bin/signup.cgi
.