| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"BoredToTears" |
| Date: |
02 Oct 2006 06:51:36 PM |
| Object: |
Guns... |
I'm not trying to provoke or looking for a fight here, but for *****
sake, when will the US do something about guns?
How many children have to be slaughtered before the US government acts?
Instead of wasting time voting on bills to ban internet gambling (in
the country that has, by far, the biggest gambling industry in the
world and is trying to export it here), perhaps banning gun ownership
would be a better idea?
Save the children: Ban guns.
.
|
|
| User: "justabeing" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
02 Oct 2006 07:03:26 PM |
|
|
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1159833096.035271.21460@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I'm not trying to provoke or looking for a fight here, but for *****
sake, when will the US do something about guns?
How many children have to be slaughtered before the US government acts?
Instead of wasting time voting on bills to ban internet gambling (in
the country that has, by far, the biggest gambling industry in the
world and is trying to export it here), perhaps banning gun ownership
would be a better idea?
Save the children: Ban guns.
thats like trying to ban drugs
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Contrarian" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
02 Oct 2006 08:51:57 PM |
|
|
BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
I'm not trying to provoke or looking for a fight here, but for ****
sake, when will the US do something about guns?
Not that simple. If I thought a ban would work...
well I don't know what I'd support then. NYC has
strict gun laws, but quite a few illegal guns.
Your disgust pain and fear are commendable.
--
Breaking news: http://lazerbrody.typepad.com July 24/25 especially
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 10:12:31 AM |
|
|
BoredToTears wrote:
I'm not trying to provoke or looking for a fight here, but for *****
sake, when will the US do something about guns?
How many children have to be slaughtered before the US government acts?
Instead of wasting time voting on bills to ban internet gambling (in
the country that has, by far, the biggest gambling industry in the
world and is trying to export it here), perhaps banning gun ownership
would be a better idea?
Save the children: Ban guns.
I don't know the anwser, but we have to do something... In the
city where I live, kids are getting shot all the time. The problem
seems to be getting worse and worse... If banning guns would work to
stop kids(and everyone else) getting shot, I'm sure most people would
be all for it...
-"Jordy"
.
|
|
|
| User: "jill" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
15 Oct 2006 01:40:18 PM |
|
|
wrote:
BoredToTears wrote:
I'm not trying to provoke or looking for a fight here, but for *****
sake, when will the US do something about guns?
How many children have to be slaughtered before the US government acts?
Instead of wasting time voting on bills to ban internet gambling (in
the country that has, by far, the biggest gambling industry in the
world and is trying to export it here), perhaps banning gun ownership
would be a better idea?
Save the children: Ban guns.
I don't know the anwser, but we have to do something... In the
city where I live, kids are getting shot all the time. The problem
seems to be getting worse and worse... If banning guns would work to
stop kids(and everyone else) getting shot, I'm sure most people would
be all for it...
-"Jordy"
The kids who snap and just start blowing other kids away tend to
be white suburban kids, or from rural areas not from inner cites where
we know there is a higher crime rate .
doesn't fit.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 03:20:37 PM |
|
|
On 3 Oct 2006 08:12:31 -0700, wrote:
I don't know the anwser, but we have to do something... In the
city where I live, kids are getting shot all the time. The problem
seems to be getting worse and worse... If banning guns would work to
stop kids(and everyone else) getting shot, I'm sure most people would
be all for it...
Don't you live in New York? They already have a ban on handguns. Obviously
it doesn't work. It doesn't work in Washington D.C. either.
Some would point out that such limited bans are useless because guns can be
easily obtained outside the city. But that is the point. Criminals will get
guns any way they can. The old adage that if guns are banned only criminals
will have guns is no joke, it's a truth.
All states that have adopted concealed carry laws have seen a drop in
crime. Criminals are generally cowards who look for the easy mark; just
like all other predators in nature who go for the smallest and weakest
game. There has been more than one study, and countless anecdotal reports,
of criminals in prison who state that they will avoid a potential target if
they think the target is armed.
All of this means less victimization for decent people. It doesn't do
anything for criminals who shoot each other, such as gangs, or the innocent
bystanders that get shot in such exchanges.
The answer? Enforce the laws that are already on the books. There is a
federally mandated five year additional sentence for using a gun during the
commission of a crime. But the gun possession charge is almost always
thrown out in a plea bargain! *That* is what you need to contact your
representatives about. And that is what you need to keep in mind when you
go to vote for your local DA. Vote for a DA that will toss out all charges
of marijuana possession, and instead use his/her resources to fight tooth
and nail prosecuting felons with handguns.
Even after my move, I'm still on the very edge of Milwaukee County, which
has one of the most incompetent and wimpy DA's in the nation. I'm starting
to think the criminals are his primary constituency.
I now border Waukesha County, which has the fiercest DA in the state.
If I ever become criminally minded, I know on which side of the border to
stay. Most all the criminals know.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 02:47:08 PM |
|
|
In message <1159833096.035271.21460@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> writes
I'm not trying to provoke or looking for a fight here, but for *****
sake, when will the US do something about guns?
How many children have to be slaughtered before the US government acts?
Instead of wasting time voting on bills to ban internet gambling (in
the country that has, by far, the biggest gambling industry in the
world and is trying to export it here), perhaps banning gun ownership
would be a better idea?
Save the children: Ban guns.
Good luck.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tinkerbell" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 08:19:32 PM |
|
|
If you make something illegal people will find a way to get it just
like drugs just like my Neighborhood! It will make it even somehow more
appealing. Think of prohibition. I live in one of the worst
neighborhood in Salt Lake City and no Slunky not Down Town near Rose
Park there have been shootings here on a regular basis and cops doing
something and stopping someone regularly. If you take away a person
right to bar arms the cops will be armed and the scum will be armed and
the rest? The rest will have to be either incredibly careful in there
bad neighborhoods or move to somewhere they can't afford were the crime
rate may be less. But these day it seems that crime is not economically
based so no place is really 100% safe it all a crap shoot. I think you
have to and should have the choice to bar arms if you want to. But if
the scum want to get a gun to cause harm there going to find a way
legally or illegally. Sad but true I don't think a law would make any
difference. Just my opinion. Tink
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 08:22:49 PM |
|
|
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159924772.058830.61370@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
If you make something illegal people will find a way to get it just
like drugs just like my Neighborhood! It will make it even somehow more
appealing. Think of prohibition. I live in one of the worst
neighborhood in Salt Lake City and no Slunky not Down Town near Rose
Park there have been shootings here on a regular basis and cops doing
something and stopping someone regularly. If you take away a person
right to bar arms the cops will be armed and the scum will be armed and
the rest? The rest will have to be either incredibly careful in there
bad neighborhoods or move to somewhere they can't afford were the crime
rate may be less. But these day it seems that crime is not economically
based so no place is really 100% safe it all a crap shoot. I think you
have to and should have the choice to bar arms if you want to. But if
the scum want to get a gun to cause harm there going to find a way
legally or illegally. Sad but true I don't think a law would make any
difference. Just my opinion. Tink
check the stats on other countries with gun control laws ,
then come back and say this again , New York has ,
more murders by gun in one month than all of Canada has all year
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tinkerbell" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 08:26:13 PM |
|
|
Yes and if you check those stats there mostly is not all by illegal not
registered guns. Daisy I mean Tink
% wrote:
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159924772.058830.61370@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
If you make something illegal people will find a way to get it just
like drugs just like my Neighborhood! It will make it even somehow more
appealing. Think of prohibition. I live in one of the worst
neighborhood in Salt Lake City and no Slunky not Down Town near Rose
Park there have been shootings here on a regular basis and cops doing
something and stopping someone regularly. If you take away a person
right to bar arms the cops will be armed and the scum will be armed and
the rest? The rest will have to be either incredibly careful in there
bad neighborhoods or move to somewhere they can't afford were the crime
rate may be less. But these day it seems that crime is not economically
based so no place is really 100% safe it all a crap shoot. I think you
have to and should have the choice to bar arms if you want to. But if
the scum want to get a gun to cause harm there going to find a way
legally or illegally. Sad but true I don't think a law would make any
difference. Just my opinion. Tink
check the stats on other countries with gun control laws ,
then come back and say this again , New York has ,
more murders by gun in one month than all of Canada has all year
.
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
04 Oct 2006 02:43:53 AM |
|
|
On 3 Oct 2006 18:26:13 -0700, "Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yes and if you check those stats there mostly is not all by illegal not
registered guns. Daisy I mean Tink
You also have to compare apples to apples. Vancouver, BC and Seattle, WA
have very similar rates of gun violence.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 08:31:54 PM |
|
|
so what does that matter , do you die less ,
if you're shot with a registered gun ,
oh , ok , i didn't know that
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159925173.400338.137040@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Yes and if you check those stats there mostly is not all by illegal not
registered guns. Daisy I mean Tink
% wrote:
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159924772.058830.61370@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
If you make something illegal people will find a way to get it just
like drugs just like my Neighborhood! It will make it even somehow
more
appealing. Think of prohibition. I live in one of the worst
neighborhood in Salt Lake City and no Slunky not Down Town near Rose
Park there have been shootings here on a regular basis and cops doing
something and stopping someone regularly. If you take away a person
right to bar arms the cops will be armed and the scum will be armed
and
the rest? The rest will have to be either incredibly careful in there
bad neighborhoods or move to somewhere they can't afford were the
crime
rate may be less. But these day it seems that crime is not
economically
based so no place is really 100% safe it all a crap shoot. I think you
have to and should have the choice to bar arms if you want to. But if
the scum want to get a gun to cause harm there going to find a way
legally or illegally. Sad but true I don't think a law would make any
difference. Just my opinion. Tink
check the stats on other countries with gun control laws ,
then come back and say this again , New York has ,
more murders by gun in one month than all of Canada has all year
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tinkerbell" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 08:41:34 PM |
|
|
God you are such a whiner? What I am not alowed to have a opinion with
out you giving me your 2%? Quit being a brat! If your against guns fine
ok. You have come in and pissed on all my emails trouse allready I
appoligised I told you I thought you and H7% were the same person. So
play nice allready! Mrs Tired Tink
% wrote:
so what does that matter , do you die less ,
if you're shot with a registered gun ,
oh , ok , i didn't know that
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159925173.400338.137040@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Yes and if you check those stats there mostly is not all by illegal not
registered guns. Daisy I mean Tink
% wrote:
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159924772.058830.61370@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
If you make something illegal people will find a way to get it just
like drugs just like my Neighborhood! It will make it even somehow
more
appealing. Think of prohibition. I live in one of the worst
neighborhood in Salt Lake City and no Slunky not Down Town near Rose
Park there have been shootings here on a regular basis and cops doing
something and stopping someone regularly. If you take away a person
right to bar arms the cops will be armed and the scum will be armed
and
the rest? The rest will have to be either incredibly careful in there
bad neighborhoods or move to somewhere they can't afford were the
crime
rate may be less. But these day it seems that crime is not
economically
based so no place is really 100% safe it all a crap shoot. I think you
have to and should have the choice to bar arms if you want to. But if
the scum want to get a gun to cause harm there going to find a way
legally or illegally. Sad but true I don't think a law would make any
difference. Just my opinion. Tink
check the stats on other countries with gun control laws ,
then come back and say this again , New York has ,
more murders by gun in one month than all of Canada has all year
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
05 Oct 2006 03:19:02 PM |
|
|
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159926094.636031.167200@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
God you are such a whiner? What I am not alowed to have a opinion with
out you giving me your 2%?
You are allowed to have an opinion as well as the right to express it. I
suggest, for your own sake, that you do just that without concerning
yourself with what anyone else thinks. Most of what goes on in here is not
personal and it helps to remember that and take everything said with a grain
of salt. If or when it ever does become personal and you find it difficult
to deal with, you can always kill-file the offender. Happy posting. :-)
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
05 Oct 2006 06:59:26 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:19:02 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote:
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159926094.636031.167200@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
God you are such a whiner? What I am not alowed to have a opinion with
out you giving me your 2%?
You are allowed to have an opinion as well as the right to express it. I
suggest, for your own sake, that you do just that without concerning
yourself with what anyone else thinks. Most of what goes on in here is not
personal and it helps to remember that and take everything said with a grain
of salt. If or when it ever does become personal and you find it difficult
to deal with, you can always kill-file the offender. Happy posting. :-)
And Usenet requires so many grains of salt that you had better make sure to
drink plenty of water also. Does potassium salt count? Some people have
problems with sodium.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
07 Oct 2006 11:00:39 AM |
|
|
"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message
news:qu6bi21r3m2e64k4ffhp0bnjbkctq2csna@news.easynews.com...
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:19:02 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159926094.636031.167200@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
God you are such a whiner? What I am not alowed to have a opinion with
out you giving me your 2%?
You are allowed to have an opinion as well as the right to express it. I
suggest, for your own sake, that you do just that without concerning
yourself with what anyone else thinks. Most of what goes on in here is
not
personal and it helps to remember that and take everything said with a
grain
of salt. If or when it ever does become personal and you find it
difficult
to deal with, you can always kill-file the offender. Happy posting. :-)
And Usenet requires so many grains of salt that you had better make sure
to
drink plenty of water also. Does potassium salt count? Some people have
problems with sodium.
You've got that right and yes potassium salt counts. All salt counts.
Geez. As for me personally, between my Epival and my Lithium, I have become
so salty I couldn't stand in a cow pasture without being swarmed. Are we
having fun yet?
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
07 Oct 2006 11:55:59 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 12:00:39 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote:
You've got that right and yes potassium salt counts. All salt counts.
Geez. As for me personally, between my Epival and my Lithium, I have become
so salty I couldn't stand in a cow pasture without being swarmed. Are we
having fun yet?
If you don't mind me asking, what dose of lithium are you taking? I'm on
900 mg and 1350 mg on alternating days. Three 450's every day gave me hand
tremors.
I haven't seen any particular beneficial effects Bipolar-wise. But some
studies have suggested that lithium has a protective effect on neurons
(protection from damage by glutamate) and can actually promote the
generation of new neurons.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
09 Oct 2006 12:56:18 PM |
|
|
"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message
news:a01hi2dlc7ne1v6aj1v0qchmpg91kchlhl@news.easynews.com...
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 12:00:39 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
You've got that right and yes potassium salt counts. All salt counts.
Geez. As for me personally, between my Epival and my Lithium, I have
become
so salty I couldn't stand in a cow pasture without being swarmed. Are we
having fun yet?
If you don't mind me asking, what dose of lithium are you taking? I'm on
900 mg and 1350 mg on alternating days. Three 450's every day gave me hand
tremors.
I haven't seen any particular beneficial effects Bipolar-wise. But some
studies have suggested that lithium has a protective effect on neurons
(protection from damage by glutamate) and can actually promote the
generation of new neurons.
Oh no, I don't mind you asking. I take 600mg of Lithium at once right
before dinner around 5:00 p.m. I was taking it before bed, but was having
trouble with lethargy and serious difficulty waking up in the morning.
Since both my pdoc and my pharmacist said it didn't matter what time I took
it, I decided to fiddle with the time to find one more suitable for me. I
found that it sits better and I have fewer side effects if I eat right
after, so that's how I ended up at the dinner hour. Even on 600mg I get the
hand tremors too, some days are worse than others, but I don't find it
especially debilitating yet. I am required to drink at least 12 to 15
glasses of water a day and usually do, of course the downfall to that is 15
going in is about 25 coming out so, as you may already know yourself, life
is often lived around where the nearest washroom is located.
In my case the beneficial effects Bipolar-wise were enormous. My pdoc put
me on it because I was extremely suicidal at the time and she said it was
one of the most reliable and fast acting mood stabilizers for severe
suicidal ideation. As far as I was concerned, she was right. Within a week
or two the intrusive thoughts and compulsion was completely gone. She also
mentioned the new generation of neurons and seems to agree with much of the
research being done. She said once I reached stability and remained there
for at least six months, we could revisit the medication cocktail and adjust
it if necessary, but truth is, I don't know that I want to. I'm more stable
and happy now than I have ever been and don't want to start messing with
what works.
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
09 Oct 2006 03:29:00 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:56:18 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Oh no, I don't mind you asking. I take 600mg of Lithium at once right
before dinner around 5:00 p.m. I was taking it before bed, but was having
trouble with lethargy and serious difficulty waking up in the morning.
Since both my pdoc and my pharmacist said it didn't matter what time I took
it, I decided to fiddle with the time to find one more suitable for me. I
found that it sits better and I have fewer side effects if I eat right
after, so that's how I ended up at the dinner hour. Even on 600mg I get the
hand tremors too, some days are worse than others, but I don't find it
especially debilitating yet. I am required to drink at least 12 to 15
glasses of water a day and usually do, of course the downfall to that is 15
going in is about 25 coming out so, as you may already know yourself, life
is often lived around where the nearest washroom is located.
Water is the problem. I've been on a soda kick again. Caffeinated soda at
that, which is dehydrating. I have to start drinking more water.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 08:48:59 PM |
|
|
God you're such a tight assed *****
go ahead , have your opinion , i'll ignore it anyway ,
but you never answered my question
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159926094.636031.167200@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
God you are such a whiner? What I am not alowed to have a opinion with
out you giving me your 2%? Quit being a brat! If your against guns fine
ok. You have come in and pissed on all my emails trouse allready I
appoligised I told you I thought you and H7% were the same person. So
play nice allready! Mrs Tired Tink
% wrote:
so what does that matter , do you die less ,
if you're shot with a registered gun ,
oh , ok , i didn't know that
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159925173.400338.137040@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Yes and if you check those stats there mostly is not all by illegal
not
registered guns. Daisy I mean Tink
% wrote:
"Tinkerbell" <Tinkerbellsamusement@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159924772.058830.61370@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
If you make something illegal people will find a way to get it
just
like drugs just like my Neighborhood! It will make it even somehow
more
appealing. Think of prohibition. I live in one of the worst
neighborhood in Salt Lake City and no Slunky not Down Town near
Rose
Park there have been shootings here on a regular basis and cops
doing
something and stopping someone regularly. If you take away a
person
right to bar arms the cops will be armed and the scum will be
armed
and
the rest? The rest will have to be either incredibly careful in
there
bad neighborhoods or move to somewhere they can't afford were the
crime
rate may be less. But these day it seems that crime is not
economically
based so no place is really 100% safe it all a crap shoot. I think
you
have to and should have the choice to bar arms if you want to. But
if
the scum want to get a gun to cause harm there going to find a way
legally or illegally. Sad but true I don't think a law would make
any
difference. Just my opinion. Tink
check the stats on other countries with gun control laws ,
then come back and say this again , New York has ,
more murders by gun in one month than all of Canada has all year
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
02 Oct 2006 11:16:51 PM |
|
|
On 2 Oct 2006 16:51:36 -0700, "BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
I'm not trying to provoke or looking for a fight here, but for *****
sake, when will the US do something about guns?
How many children have to be slaughtered before the US government acts?
Instead of wasting time voting on bills to ban internet gambling (in
the country that has, by far, the biggest gambling industry in the
world and is trying to export it here), perhaps banning gun ownership
would be a better idea?
Save the children: Ban guns.
Why not ban cars first? They kill far more children than guns. Then you
have swimming pools, which also kill more children than guns. If you check
the CDC statistics you'll find a lot of things that kill more children than
guns.
I think you have been shocked senseless by recent news. I don't blame you -
that is what the news is designed to do.
Guns cannot be banned in the U.S. The second amendment would take
two-thirds of the states to repeal. Impossible, especially since all but
seven states allow licensed concealed carry of firearms.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
02 Oct 2006 11:21:55 PM |
|
|
"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote in message
news:emo3i2hoeapiur9vm55ln9eq5g5604s1bv@news.easynews.com...
On 2 Oct 2006 16:51:36 -0700, "BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
I'm not trying to provoke or looking for a fight here, but for *****
sake, when will the US do something about guns?
How many children have to be slaughtered before the US government acts?
Instead of wasting time voting on bills to ban internet gambling (in
the country that has, by far, the biggest gambling industry in the
world and is trying to export it here), perhaps banning gun ownership
would be a better idea?
Save the children: Ban guns.
Why not ban cars first? They kill far more children than guns. Then you
have swimming pools, which also kill more children than guns. If you check
the CDC statistics you'll find a lot of things that kill more children
than
guns.
I think you have been shocked senseless by recent news. I don't blame
you -
that is what the news is designed to do.
Guns cannot be banned in the U.S. The second amendment would take
two-thirds of the states to repeal. Impossible, especially since all but
seven states allow licensed concealed carry of firearms.
there's even a state where ,
you can be arrested because ,
you don't own a gun
.
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
02 Oct 2006 11:24:44 PM |
|
|
_/ % wrote \_
there's even a state where ,
you can be arrested because ,
you don't own a gun
There's a town south of here with that law.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
02 Oct 2006 11:28:06 PM |
|
|
"slunky" <slunky@globalzero.org> wrote in message
news:slrnei3pjl.jt.slunky@latitude.zero...
_/ % wrote \_
there's even a state where ,
you can be arrested because ,
you don't own a gun
There's a town south of here with that law.
--
-slunky
Slunky , with all do respect ,
that's a fucked up law ,
what are ya in for ,
failure to produce a firearm
.
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
02 Oct 2006 11:33:12 PM |
|
|
_/ % wrote \_
Slunky , with all do respect ,
that's a fucked up law ,
what are ya in for ,
failure to produce a firearm
You know a weird law we have right here in Salt Lake City? It's illegal
to carry a ukelele in a paper bag down Main St. I don't know how much
they enforce it, and I'm not about to risk my ***** finding out.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
02 Oct 2006 11:36:30 PM |
|
|
"slunky" <slunky@globalzero.org> wrote in message
news:slrnei3q3h.jt.slunky@latitude.zero...
_/ % wrote \_
Slunky , with all do respect ,
that's a fucked up law ,
what are ya in for ,
failure to produce a firearm
You know a weird law we have right here in Salt Lake City? It's illegal
to carry a ukelele in a paper bag down Main St. I don't know how much
they enforce it, and I'm not about to risk my ***** finding out.
--
-slunky
yea , there are old laws on the books ,
that really make you wonder ,
but they just never got taken off ,
when the times changed
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bacon" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 08:00:28 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:33:12 GMT, slunky <slunky@globalzero.org>
wrote:
_/ % wrote \_
Slunky , with all do respect ,
that's a fucked up law ,
what are ya in for ,
failure to produce a firearm
You know a weird law we have right here in Salt Lake City? It's illegal
to carry a ukelele in a paper bag down Main St. I don't know how much
they enforce it, and I'm not about to risk my ***** finding out.
There must be some fucked up story behind that law. "The drunk keeps
claiming its a ukelele and we can't search without a warrant. Let's
just add ukeleles to the open container law so we can take a look and
have it behind us. Hell, your pappy's the mayor and town judge."
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 02:36:14 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:33:12 GMT, slunky <slunky@globalzero.org> wrote:
_/ % wrote \_
Slunky , with all do respect ,
that's a fucked up law ,
what are ya in for ,
failure to produce a firearm
You know a weird law we have right here in Salt Lake City? It's illegal
to carry a ukelele in a paper bag down Main St. I don't know how much
they enforce it, and I'm not about to risk my ***** finding out.
Oh come on, give it a try. I'll supply the paper bag.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
02 Oct 2006 11:34:26 PM |
|
|
_/ slunky wrote \_
You know a weird law we have right here in Salt Lake City? It's illegal
to carry a ukelele in a paper bag down Main St. I don't know how much
they enforce it, and I'm not about to risk my ***** finding out.
Oh, and there's another one, it's illegal to have sex in an ambulance.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 02:41:02 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:34:26 GMT, slunky <slunky@globalzero.org> wrote:
_/ slunky wrote \_
You know a weird law we have right here in Salt Lake City? It's illegal
to carry a ukelele in a paper bag down Main St. I don't know how much
they enforce it, and I'm not about to risk my ***** finding out.
Oh, and there's another one, it's illegal to have sex in an ambulance.
Even if your other ten wives consent? That's outrageous!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bacon" |
|
| Title: Re: Guns... |
03 Oct 2006 07:56:31 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 04:24:44 GMT, slunky <slunky@globalzero.org>
wrote:
_/ % wrote \_
there's even a state where ,
you can be arrested because ,
you don't own a gun
There's a town south of here with that law.
Cop: "I think you know why I pulled you over son. You know the
routine, show me your drivers license, proof of insurance and your
afternoon gun of course."
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
