| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"Charles" |
| Date: |
15 Mar 2007 02:43:28 PM |
| Object: |
How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
.
|
|
| User: "Fast Recovery" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 04:15:45 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:28 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
So if laughing shows your status, then absense of laughter means you
don't believe in status? That could be a good thing. It appears to
me that there are more situations where laughter occurs than what this
study covers.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 03:35:27 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:15:45 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:28 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
So if laughing shows your status, then absense of laughter means you
don't believe in status? That could be a good thing. It appears to
me that there are more situations where laughter occurs than what this
study covers.
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
__
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
17 Mar 2007 10:13:38 AM |
|
|
"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:odbjv2tcts7oeoc68rn1s7ajtdhq5v5dtp@4ax.com...
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:15:45 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:28 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
So if laughing shows your status, then absense of laughter means you
don't believe in status? That could be a good thing. It appears to
me that there are more situations where laughter occurs than what this
study covers.
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
I think the guy's "so called" research leaves a lot to be desired. The
article was, well IMHO, ridiculous. If something is funny, I laugh, if it
isn't, I don't laugh. If I don't laugh I usually try to say something
polite, such as..."sorry but I didn't find that funny" but either way there
is no deep primal instinctive reason behind my response. It might be a lot
of things but complicated isn't one of them. It's either funny or it isn't.
What interests me is why researchers are so intent on explaining everything
we do, as if there HAS to be a reason for every action.
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
17 Mar 2007 10:15:34 AM |
|
|
"Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:eth0j3$q63$1@news.datemas.de...
"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:odbjv2tcts7oeoc68rn1s7ajtdhq5v5dtp@4ax.com...
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:15:45 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:28 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from
the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of
something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
So if laughing shows your status, then absense of laughter means you
don't believe in status? That could be a good thing. It appears to
me that there are more situations where laughter occurs than what
this
study covers.
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter
could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
I think the guy's "so called" research leaves a lot to be desired.
The
article was, well IMHO, ridiculous. If something is funny, I laugh,
if it
isn't, I don't laugh. If I don't laugh I usually try to say something
polite, such as..."sorry but I didn't find that funny" but either way
there
is no deep primal instinctive reason behind my response. It might be
a lot
of things but complicated isn't one of them. It's either funny or it
isn't.
What interests me is why researchers are so intent on explaining
everything
we do, as if there HAS to be a reason for every action.
--
Rhi
there is a reason , according to Freud it means you wanna do it with
your mom
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
17 Mar 2007 11:21:34 AM |
|
|
In message <eth0j3$q63$1@news.datemas.de>, Rhiannon
<rhianon@sympatico.ca> writes
What interests me is why researchers are so intent on explaining everything
we do, as if there HAS to be a reason for every action.
You believe in random behaviour? Doesn't that make a nonsense of, for
instance, crime? Anyone can do anything and say they didn't intend to do
it, it just happened.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
19 Mar 2007 11:42:24 AM |
|
|
"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:voFQZ6DOWB$FFwBE@harding.demon.co.uk...
In message <eth0j3$q63$1@news.datemas.de>, Rhiannon <rhianon@sympatico.ca>
writes
What interests me is why researchers are so intent on explaining
everything
we do, as if there HAS to be a reason for every action.
You believe in random behaviour? Doesn't that make a nonsense of, for
instance, crime? Anyone can do anything and say they didn't intend to do
it, it just happened.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
I worded that part of my response poorly. I don't mean that we do things
without reason, I mean that we often do things for simple and obvious
reasons. In this case, laughter, is often just a normal response to
stimuli, not a deliberate behaviour resulting from some deep seated
psychological pathos, or the vestiges of our primordial selves. This need
to turn simple things into major things that they aren't has begun to feel
as if scientists need us to be ultra complicated to justify their study of
us.
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bacon" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
17 Mar 2007 01:09:12 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:13:38 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:odbjv2tcts7oeoc68rn1s7ajtdhq5v5dtp@4ax.com...
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:15:45 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:28 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
So if laughing shows your status, then absense of laughter means you
don't believe in status? That could be a good thing. It appears to
me that there are more situations where laughter occurs than what this
study covers.
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
I think the guy's "so called" research leaves a lot to be desired. The
article was, well IMHO, ridiculous. If something is funny, I laugh, if it
isn't, I don't laugh. If I don't laugh I usually try to say something
polite, such as..."sorry but I didn't find that funny" but either way there
is no deep primal instinctive reason behind my response. It might be a lot
of things but complicated isn't one of them. It's either funny or it isn't.
What interests me is why researchers are so intent on explaining everything
we do, as if there HAS to be a reason for every action.
Like the surveys...emotional illness is really just chaos, I can go
down to the bottom and up to the top and back down in an hour, ain't
nobody got the goods on where my heads gonna be ever.
Don't you hate it when you catch yourself in an obvious fake laugh...I
just think about how much I hate it when people fake laugh on my
behalf, I'd rather interact with a consistently predictable *****
than some cheese *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
17 Mar 2007 05:21:07 PM |
|
|
"Bacon" <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:u7aov25gjoj2mtahtq80tcambrg6hog97j@4ax.com...
Like the surveys...emotional illness is really just chaos, I can go
down to the bottom and up to the top and back down in an hour, ain't
nobody got the goods on where my heads gonna be ever.
Don't you hate it when you catch yourself in an obvious fake laugh...I
just think about how much I hate it when people fake laugh on my
behalf, I'd rather interact with a consistently predictable *****
than some cheese *****.
I don't fake laugh. It's disrespectful because it's dishonest. I don't do
it here either. If I type "laugh" you can trust that I am in fact laughing.
Out loud most of the time. I wouldn't want to interact with a consistently
predictable ***** either, but that's just me. I would rather interact
with people who are honest and decent...let's say *most* of the time...can I
have that without all that other stuff?
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "yack yack@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
17 Mar 2007 01:33:22 PM |
|
|
Bacon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:13:38 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:odbjv2tcts7oeoc68rn1s7ajtdhq5v5dtp@4ax.com...
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:15:45 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:28 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
So if laughing shows your status, then absense of laughter means you
don't believe in status? That could be a good thing. It appears to
me that there are more situations where laughter occurs than what this
study covers.
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
I think the guy's "so called" research leaves a lot to be desired. The
article was, well IMHO, ridiculous. If something is funny, I laugh, if it
isn't, I don't laugh. If I don't laugh I usually try to say something
polite, such as..."sorry but I didn't find that funny" but either way there
is no deep primal instinctive reason behind my response. It might be a lot
of things but complicated isn't one of them. It's either funny or it isn't.
What interests me is why researchers are so intent on explaining everything
we do, as if there HAS to be a reason for every action.
Like the surveys...emotional illness is really just chaos, I can go
down to the bottom and up to the top and back down in an hour, ain't
nobody got the goods on where my heads gonna be ever.
Don't you hate it when you catch yourself in an obvious fake laugh...I
just think about how much I hate it when people fake laugh on my
behalf, I'd rather interact with a consistently predictable *****
than some cheese *****.
a haw haw haw
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "yack yack@invalid" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
17 Mar 2007 01:33:39 PM |
|
|
Bacon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:13:38 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:odbjv2tcts7oeoc68rn1s7ajtdhq5v5dtp@4ax.com...
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:15:45 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:28 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
So if laughing shows your status, then absense of laughter means you
don't believe in status? That could be a good thing. It appears to
me that there are more situations where laughter occurs than what this
study covers.
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
I think the guy's "so called" research leaves a lot to be desired. The
article was, well IMHO, ridiculous. If something is funny, I laugh, if it
isn't, I don't laugh. If I don't laugh I usually try to say something
polite, such as..."sorry but I didn't find that funny" but either way there
is no deep primal instinctive reason behind my response. It might be a lot
of things but complicated isn't one of them. It's either funny or it isn't.
What interests me is why researchers are so intent on explaining everything
we do, as if there HAS to be a reason for every action.
Like the surveys...emotional illness is really just chaos, I can go
down to the bottom and up to the top and back down in an hour, ain't
nobody got the goods on where my heads gonna be ever.
Don't you hate it when you catch yourself in an obvious fake laugh...I
just think about how much I hate it when people fake laugh on my
behalf, I'd rather interact with a consistently predictable *****
than some cheese *****.
bacon, do you fake orgams too?
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charles" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
17 Mar 2007 01:18:18 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:13:38 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:odbjv2tcts7oeoc68rn1s7ajtdhq5v5dtp@4ax.com...
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:15:45 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:28 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
So if laughing shows your status, then absense of laughter means you
don't believe in status? That could be a good thing. It appears to
me that there are more situations where laughter occurs than what this
study covers.
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
I think the guy's "so called" research leaves a lot to be desired. The
article was, well IMHO, ridiculous. If something is funny, I laugh, if it
isn't, I don't laugh. If I don't laugh I usually try to say something
polite, such as..."sorry but I didn't find that funny" but either way there
is no deep primal instinctive reason behind my response. It might be a lot
of things but complicated isn't one of them. It's either funny or it isn't.
What interests me is why researchers are so intent on explaining everything
we do, as if there HAS to be a reason for every action.
Researchers look into things because if they didn't then they'd have
to go get real jobs.
Charles
__
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rhiannon" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
17 Mar 2007 04:58:24 PM |
|
|
"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:93cov2ltvap6ld2uk3jc5md2j4vpapr3ck@4ax.com...
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:13:38 -0400, "Rhiannon" <rhianon@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
"Charles" <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> wrote in message
news:odbjv2tcts7oeoc68rn1s7ajtdhq5v5dtp@4ax.com...
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:15:45 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:43:28 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I camped overnight in Death Valley Park. I could hear sounds from the
adjacent campers, couldn't understand what they said, but the woman
laughed a lot, it was pleasant to listen to, reminding me of something
missing in my life.
Then I read a news article about laughter, here:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/14/healthscience/snlaugh.php
It would seem that I just want someone to be submissive to me. I
don't like to think of myself that way.
Charles
__
So if laughing shows your status, then absense of laughter means you
don't believe in status? That could be a good thing. It appears to
me that there are more situations where laughter occurs than what this
study covers.
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
I think the guy's "so called" research leaves a lot to be desired. The
article was, well IMHO, ridiculous. If something is funny, I laugh, if it
isn't, I don't laugh. If I don't laugh I usually try to say something
polite, such as..."sorry but I didn't find that funny" but either way
there
is no deep primal instinctive reason behind my response. It might be a
lot
of things but complicated isn't one of them. It's either funny or it
isn't.
What interests me is why researchers are so intent on explaining
everything
we do, as if there HAS to be a reason for every action.
Researchers look into things because if they didn't then they'd have
to go get real jobs.
Charles
Laugh! And yes that was a real laugh, out loud, right at the computer
screen. :-)
--
Rhi
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fast Recovery" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 04:37:33 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:35:27 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
__
But it could also indicate that a person doesn't buy into status,
could it not?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 03:45:20 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:37:33 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:35:27 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
No, laughter reflects a subordinate status. absence of laughter could
then reflect a feeling of superior status, as was indicated in the
article mentioned.
Charles
__
But it could also indicate that a person doesn't buy into status,
could it not?
I don't think it is possible for people to not have a sense of status.
At least the people I know.
Charles
__
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fast Recovery" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 04:56:35 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:45:20 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I don't think it is possible for people to not have a sense of status.
At least the people I know.
Charles
__
Give me an example.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 04:24:53 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:56:35 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:45:20 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I don't think it is possible for people to not have a sense of status.
At least the people I know.
Charles
__
Give me an example.
Give you an example of something that doesn't happen? Does that
request make sense to you?
Charles
__
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fast Recovery" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 05:27:28 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:24:53 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:56:35 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:45:20 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I don't think it is possible for people to not have a sense of status.
At least the people I know.
Charles
__
Give me an example.
Give you an example of something that doesn't happen? Does that
request make sense to you?
Charles
__
Give me an example of a person being of subordinate or superior
status.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 04:34:13 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:27:28 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:24:53 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:56:35 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:45:20 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
I don't think it is possible for people to not have a sense of status.
At least the people I know.
Charles
__
Give me an example.
Give you an example of something that doesn't happen? Does that
request make sense to you?
Charles
__
Give me an example of a person being of subordinate or superior
status.
In the workplace, the boss has status as superior, an underling has
status as inferior.
The Pope is superior, Father Superior is his inferior.
Charles
__
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fast Recovery" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 05:40:22 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:34:13 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:27:28 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
In the workplace, the boss has status as superior, an underling has
status as inferior.
The Pope is superior, Father Superior is his inferior.
Charles
__
But haven't you been around a boss who's social status is inferior to
an underling? The underling does not laugh at the boss's jokes?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 04:46:15 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:40:22 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:34:13 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:27:28 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
In the workplace, the boss has status as superior, an underling has
status as inferior.
The Pope is superior, Father Superior is his inferior.
Charles
__
But haven't you been around a boss who's social status is inferior to
an underling? The underling does not laugh at the boss's jokes?
no
Charles
__
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fast Recovery" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 05:47:13 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:46:15 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
But haven't you been around a boss who's social status is inferior to
an underling? The underling does not laugh at the boss's jokes?
no
Charles
__
It does happen so there are people out there who don't accept status.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 04:50:39 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:47:13 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:46:15 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
But haven't you been around a boss who's social status is inferior to
an underling? The underling does not laugh at the boss's jokes?
no
Charles
__
It does happen so there are people out there who don't accept status.
Only by people who consider themselves to be superior.
I may not accept trucks, but I'm clever enough to not sleep on the
freeway.
gotta run, have fun.
Charles
__
.
|
|
|
| User: "Fast Recovery" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 09:38:51 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:50:39 GMT, Charles <ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net>
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:47:13 -0600, Fast Recovery
<flying14@hotmail.com> wrote:
Only by people who consider themselves to be superior.
I may not accept trucks, but I'm clever enough to not sleep on the
freeway.
gotta run, have fun.
Charles
__
You can think of yourself as an equal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 08:42:55 PM |
|
|
_/ Fast Recovery wrote \_
You can think of yourself as an equal.
The liar came back.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 08:43:04 PM |
|
|
"slunky" <slunky@globalzero.org> wrote in message
news:slrnevjteb.2q0m.slunky@evo.zero...
_/ Fast Recovery wrote \_
You can think of yourself as an equal.
The liar came back.
--
-slunky
if he is proof of what the book does ,
it must really suck
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 08:54:04 PM |
|
|
"%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:OsadnRRbVPJDamTYnZ2dnUVZ_hWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
"slunky" <slunky@globalzero.org> wrote in message
news:slrnevjteb.2q0m.slunky@evo.zero...
_/ Fast Recovery wrote \_
You can think of yourself as an equal.
The liar came back.
--
-slunky
if he is proof of what the book does ,
it must really suck
It teaches you to just bang your head on a brick wall until everyone agrees
with you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 08:54:46 PM |
|
|
_/ % wrote \_
if he is proof of what the book does ,
it must really suck
Agreed, and it's almost sad to see how he thinks he's better than us
because he found religion in a book that sells for $7.99 in grocery
market checkout stands.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bacon" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 08:55:48 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:54:46 GMT, slunky <slunky@globalzero.org>
wrote:
_/ % wrote \_
if he is proof of what the book does ,
it must really suck
Agreed, and it's almost sad to see how he thinks he's better than us
because he found religion in a book that sells for $7.99 in grocery
market checkout stands.
he's part of a cult from what it sounds like, repetitive brain wash
type communication like a programmed slave
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 08:56:28 PM |
|
|
"Bacon" <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:v7ujv2t22kem5f5qag1dl2308ema1fjj7o@4ax.com...
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:54:46 GMT, slunky <slunky@globalzero.org>
wrote:
_/ % wrote \_
if he is proof of what the book does ,
it must really suck
Agreed, and it's almost sad to see how he thinks he's better than us
because he found religion in a book that sells for $7.99 in grocery
market checkout stands.
he's part of a cult from what it sounds like, repetitive brain wash
type communication like a programmed slave
well he's certainly one of the most ,
screwed up people i've seen pass through here for a while
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charles" |
|
| Title: Re: How To Feel Bad Without Really Trying |
15 Mar 2007 09:09:49 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:55:48 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:54:46 GMT, slunky <slunky@globalzero.org>
wrote:
_/ % wrote \_
if he is proof of what the book does ,
it must really suck
Agreed, and it's almost sad to see how he thinks he's better than us
because he found religion in a book that sells for $7.99 in grocery
market checkout stands.
he's part of a cult from what it sounds like, repetitive brain wash
type communication like a programmed slave
I think he's gathering information for a report, "What I did on spring
vacation."
Charles
__
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
