I don't understand employee scheduling



 Sociology > Depression > I don't understand employee scheduling

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Sociology > Depression
User: "Charles"
Date: 06 Jun 2006 08:42:50 PM
Object: I don't understand employee scheduling
at the sand witch shop today there were two cute girls. Sometimes
there are none. It seems that it should be evened out.
.

User: "algernon"

Title: Re: I don't understand employee scheduling 06 Jun 2006 08:50:31 PM
Are you drunk? Are you seriously suggesting that employers schedule
their workers so as to spread out the ratio of cutie pies as evenly as
possible? Wow. That's a way of thinking I just can't possibly
comprehend.
Of course, here's the punch line: Neither cute girl likely would've
talked to you. Isn't fate just cruel?
Charles wrote:

at the sand witch shop today there were two cute girls. Sometimes
there are none. It seems that it should be evened out.

.
User: "Charles"

Title: Re: I don't understand employee scheduling 06 Jun 2006 09:00:00 PM
On 6 Jun 2006 18:50:31 -0700, "algernon" <aynrand78@gmail.com> wrote:

Are you drunk? Are you seriously suggesting that employers schedule
their workers so as to spread out the ratio of cutie pies as evenly as
possible? Wow. That's a way of thinking I just can't possibly
comprehend.

No, neither, just having fun with an idea.
It was intended to be ridiculous.


Of course, here's the punch line: Neither cute girl likely would've
talked to you. Isn't fate just cruel?

And they both talked with me, one while she was making my salad, one
while she was taking the money.
.
User: "algernon"

Title: Re: I don't understand employee scheduling 06 Jun 2006 09:16:53 PM
:-D
That's pretty funny. I'll give you that.
Charles wrote:

On 6 Jun 2006 18:50:31 -0700, "algernon" <aynrand78@gmail.com> wrote:

Are you drunk? Are you seriously suggesting that employers schedule
their workers so as to spread out the ratio of cutie pies as evenly as
possible? Wow. That's a way of thinking I just can't possibly
comprehend.


No, neither, just having fun with an idea.

It was intended to be ridiculous.


Of course, here's the punch line: Neither cute girl likely would've
talked to you. Isn't fate just cruel?

And they both talked with me, one while she was making my salad, one
while she was taking the money.

.
User: "Charles"

Title: Re: I don't understand employee scheduling 06 Jun 2006 09:24:43 PM
On 6 Jun 2006 19:16:53 -0700, "algernon" <aynrand78@gmail.com> wrote:

:-D

That's pretty funny. I'll give you that.


Anyway, I'm 40 or 50 years too old for them. Way out of their
league, or they, mine.
.


User: "Alan Harding"

Title: Re: I don't understand employee scheduling 07 Jun 2006 12:43:24 PM
In message <4hcc82hue4ro6c0kt9jp1tkta5ilnoutjo@4ax.com>, Charles
<ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> writes

On 6 Jun 2006 18:50:31 -0700, "algernon" <aynrand78@gmail.com> wrote:

Are you drunk? Are you seriously suggesting that employers schedule
their workers so as to spread out the ratio of cutie pies as evenly as
possible? Wow. That's a way of thinking I just can't possibly
comprehend.


No, neither, just having fun with an idea.

It was intended to be ridiculous.


Of course, here's the punch line: Neither cute girl likely would've
talked to you. Isn't fate just cruel?

And they both talked with me, one while she was making my salad, one
while she was taking the money.

You have to pay her to be cute?
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
User: "Charles"

Title: Re: I don't understand employee scheduling 07 Jun 2006 12:56:40 PM
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 18:43:24 +0100, Alan Harding
<Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:

In message <4hcc82hue4ro6c0kt9jp1tkta5ilnoutjo@4ax.com>, Charles
<ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> writes

On 6 Jun 2006 18:50:31 -0700, "algernon" <aynrand78@gmail.com> wrote:

Are you drunk? Are you seriously suggesting that employers schedule
their workers so as to spread out the ratio of cutie pies as evenly as
possible? Wow. That's a way of thinking I just can't possibly
comprehend.


No, neither, just having fun with an idea.

It was intended to be ridiculous.


Of course, here's the punch line: Neither cute girl likely would've
talked to you. Isn't fate just cruel?

And they both talked with me, one while she was making my salad, one
while she was taking the money.


You have to pay her to be cute?

She (they actually) were already cute when I got there.
.
User: "Alan Harding"

Title: Re: I don't understand employee scheduling 07 Jun 2006 05:03:37 PM
In message <ur4e82943hfm92vch4pus5rt3a1nteptd6@4ax.com>, Charles
<ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> writes

On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 18:43:24 +0100, Alan Harding
<Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:

In message <4hcc82hue4ro6c0kt9jp1tkta5ilnoutjo@4ax.com>, Charles
<ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> writes

On 6 Jun 2006 18:50:31 -0700, "algernon" <aynrand78@gmail.com> wrote:

Are you drunk? Are you seriously suggesting that employers schedule
their workers so as to spread out the ratio of cutie pies as evenly as
possible? Wow. That's a way of thinking I just can't possibly
comprehend.


No, neither, just having fun with an idea.

It was intended to be ridiculous.


Of course, here's the punch line: Neither cute girl likely would've
talked to you. Isn't fate just cruel?

And they both talked with me, one while she was making my salad, one
while she was taking the money.


You have to pay her to be cute?


She (they actually) were already cute when I got there.

They give away random, free cuteness? How anarchic. People will be nice
to each other without gain if this carries on.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
User: "Charles"

Title: Re: I don't understand employee scheduling 07 Jun 2006 05:34:06 PM
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 23:03:37 +0100, Alan Harding
<Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:

In message <ur4e82943hfm92vch4pus5rt3a1nteptd6@4ax.com>, Charles
<ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> writes

On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 18:43:24 +0100, Alan Harding
<Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:

In message <4hcc82hue4ro6c0kt9jp1tkta5ilnoutjo@4ax.com>, Charles
<ckraft@SPAMTRAP.west.net> writes

On 6 Jun 2006 18:50:31 -0700, "algernon" <aynrand78@gmail.com> wrote:

Are you drunk? Are you seriously suggesting that employers schedule
their workers so as to spread out the ratio of cutie pies as evenly as
possible? Wow. That's a way of thinking I just can't possibly
comprehend.


No, neither, just having fun with an idea.

It was intended to be ridiculous.


Of course, here's the punch line: Neither cute girl likely would've
talked to you. Isn't fate just cruel?

And they both talked with me, one while she was making my salad, one
while she was taking the money.


You have to pay her to be cute?


She (they actually) were already cute when I got there.


They give away random, free cuteness? How anarchic. People will be nice
to each other without gain if this carries on.

I'm fighting the process, I adsorb cuteness without returning any.
Wanna help?
.







  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER