| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"Miserable Man" |
| Date: |
16 Dec 2007 06:29:02 AM |
| Object: |
I refuse to be politically correct |
The politically correct greeting is "Happy Holidays", which has come
to replace "Merry Christmas" in this country. This is because the Jews
don't like "Merry Christmas", which excludes them.
I have never said "Happy Holidays", and I never will.
---
Miserable Man
.
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 12:42:24 PM |
|
|
_/ RGB <-@-.-> wrote \_
Preferred Provider Option. It's where you can go to whatever doctor you
want and get at least some insurance coverage, but you get the most
coverage and the least paperwork if you use doctors on their
"in-network" list of "preferred providers".
Oh yea, well I know that. I thought you were talking about a TV term,
like PPV.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BoredToTears" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 12:46:33 PM |
|
|
On 17 Dec, 17:03, slunky <slu...@globalzero.org> wrote:
_/ BoredToTears <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote \_
On 17 Dec, 08:23, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
DSM-IV-TV.
Tell me, why do you place so much faith in that particular "diagnosis"
when the book it comes from is written by doctors who you have stated
are all quacks? This I do not understand and it seems to me you just
like the idea of being able to point to a reference in a book or on-
line and say, "there, that's me" when anyone asks what your problem
is. You're trying to justify your odd behaviour instead of looking for
an answer to it. Stop fannying around and get to a doctor.
First off, there's no such thing as a DSM-IV-TV. Secondly, he hasn't
actually read the *DSM-IV-TR*. He's looked up short disgnositic criteria
off the web from it which totals about 1% of the book.
--
-slunky
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest. What does surprise me is
that someone who seems to be in such distress *WILL NOT* get help. I
do no understand. Well, there is an explanation but I like to give
everyone the benefit of the doubt.
.
|
|
|
| User: "the_dawggie" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 01:35:25 PM |
|
|
BoredToTears wrote:
On 17 Dec, 17:03, slunky <slu...@globalzero.org> wrote:
_/ BoredToTears <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote \_
On 17 Dec, 08:23, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
DSM-IV-TV.
Tell me, why do you place so much faith in that particular "diagnosis"
when the book it comes from is written by doctors who you have stated
are all quacks? This I do not understand and it seems to me you just
like the idea of being able to point to a reference in a book or on-
line and say, "there, that's me" when anyone asks what your problem
is. You're trying to justify your odd behaviour instead of looking for
an answer to it. Stop fannying around and get to a doctor.
First off, there's no such thing as a DSM-IV-TV. Secondly, he hasn't
actually read the *DSM-IV-TR*. He's looked up short disgnositic criteria
off the web from it which totals about 1% of the book.
--
-slunky
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest. What does surprise me is
that someone who seems to be in such distress *WILL NOT* get help. I
do no understand. Well, there is an explanation but I like to give
everyone the benefit of the doubt.
I've read multiple references to it on the web (I do that with
everything I research and cross check), tick off the check
boxes. I've even seen a CI show in the last couple of days that
had a quack that described the name and attributes as well, she
described what I already know. I'm not a total dummy, I can blow
my nose and wipe my arse. If I go to a shrink they are just going
to tell me what I already know. I have also read that meds are not
really going to help me.
So Dr Slunky, what advice and meds do you have on offer, apart
from suggesting I see a shrink?
.
|
|
|
| User: "cal" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 02:52:31 PM |
|
|
On 12/17/07 2:35 PM, in article
1cA9j.24836$CN4.12270@news-server.bigpond.net.au, "the_dawggie"
<the_dawggie@hotmail.com> wrote:
BoredToTears wrote:
On 17 Dec, 17:03, slunky <slu...@globalzero.org> wrote:
_/ BoredToTears <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote \_
On 17 Dec, 08:23, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
DSM-IV-TV.
Tell me, why do you place so much faith in that particular "diagnosis"
when the book it comes from is written by doctors who you have stated
are all quacks? This I do not understand and it seems to me you just
like the idea of being able to point to a reference in a book or on-
line and say, "there, that's me" when anyone asks what your problem
is. You're trying to justify your odd behaviour instead of looking for
an answer to it. Stop fannying around and get to a doctor.
First off, there's no such thing as a DSM-IV-TV. Secondly, he hasn't
actually read the *DSM-IV-TR*. He's looked up short disgnositic criteria
off the web from it which totals about 1% of the book.
--
-slunky
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest. What does surprise me is
that someone who seems to be in such distress *WILL NOT* get help. I
do no understand. Well, there is an explanation but I like to give
everyone the benefit of the doubt.
I've read multiple references to it on the web (I do that with
everything I research and cross check), tick off the check
boxes. I've even seen a CI show in the last couple of days that
had a quack that described the name and attributes as well, she
described what I already know. I'm not a total dummy, I can blow
my nose and wipe my arse.
maybe so, but could you take out your appendix with a pocket knife and
surgical procedures manual you found on the web? i mean, with a reasonable
expectation of surviving.
If I go to a shrink they are just going
to tell me what I already know.
and if they tell you something else, they're quacks. so there's no point to
anything they might say. right, i get it.
I have also read that meds are not really going to help me.
but meds ARE really going to help you. there, now you've read that. problem
solved, robinson crusoe. get help.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BoredToTears" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 02:18:07 PM |
|
|
On 17 Dec, 19:35, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
BoredToTears wrote:
On 17 Dec, 17:03, slunky <slu...@globalzero.org> wrote:
_/ BoredToTears <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote \_
On 17 Dec, 08:23, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
DSM-IV-TV.
Tell me, why do you place so much faith in that particular "diagnosis"
when the book it comes from is written by doctors who you have stated
are all quacks? This I do not understand and it seems to me you just
like the idea of being able to point to a reference in a book or on-
line and say, "there, that's me" when anyone asks what your problem
is. You're trying to justify your odd behaviour instead of looking for
an answer to it. Stop fannying around and get to a doctor.
First off, there's no such thing as a DSM-IV-TV. Secondly, he hasn't
actually read the *DSM-IV-TR*. He's looked up short disgnositic criteria
off the web from it which totals about 1% of the book.
--
-slunky
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest. What does surprise me is
that someone who seems to be in such distress *WILL NOT* get help. I
do no understand. Well, there is an explanation but I like to give
everyone the benefit of the doubt.
I've read multiple references to it on the web (I do that with
everything I research and cross check), tick off the check
boxes.
Oh, well, that's that then. You read it on the web.
I've even seen a CI show in the last couple of days that
had a quack that described the name and attributes as well, she
described what I already know.
You're calling her a quack yet you're taking her word as gospel? You
really need to stop fooling yourself.
I'm not a total dummy, I can blow
my nose and wipe my arse.
You *ARE NOT* a mental health care professional and even doctors don't
try to diagnose themselves. That makes you the archetypal dummy.
If I go to a shrink they are just going
to tell me what I already know.
So, not only are you the master diagnostician with no training or
experience whatsoever you've got a fucking crystal ball too.
I have also read that meds are not
really going to help me.
Aye, and I read that Elvis and Salman Rushdie are shacked up with the
Loch Ness monster in an interspecies three-way. Idiot.
So Dr Slunky, what advice and meds do you have on offer, apart
from suggesting I see a shrink?
Slunky isn't a doctor but I reckon he knows a damn-sight more about
mental health care that you do. Stop being so fucking ignorant.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 02:56:50 PM |
|
|
_/ the_dawggie <the_dawggie@hotmail.com> wrote \_
So Dr Slunky, what advice and meds do you have on offer, apart
from suggesting I see a shrink?
Start by not lying to everyone and yourself. There's my advice. You will
be billed $50,000 for my professional consultation, but that's pennies
to you Pee Wee Moneybags.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
| User: "the_dawggie" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 04:08:56 PM |
|
|
slunky wrote:
_/ the_dawggie <the_dawggie@hotmail.com> wrote \_
So Dr Slunky, what advice and meds do you have on offer, apart
from suggesting I see a shrink?
Start by not lying to everyone and yourself. There's my advice. You will
be billed $50,000 for my professional consultation, but that's pennies
to you Pee Wee Moneybags.
Yes it would be in real life, so I'll keep it and not spend it,
going to put down another $550,000 on another apartment - no
that's not in my imagination. How the bank can pay what they do
on interest and what they take on investment plans, I don't get.
Words of advice, get into property, get property that increases
in value, and has a good rental income.
Yes, I have had a pleasant time in social occasions and in a way
strived to look like a perfect member of society. I can see that
others know what I really think. However I have to become a
different person to do that.
I'm different to how I appear in real life. Yes it's a lie,
It's a social difference, so I have to modify myself to
interact in real life.
I'm not Bill Gates, so I made the cash legally.
Not a lot left over though, live off the income it produces,
and I have to go off to work next year, and I seriously think
it's not going to work. I've been talked into it by another
family member who thinks I need to stick with it for the next
four to five years before I fully retire.
The whole thing is silly. I'd rather just relax on the beach
and not care about anything.
Beach/country, food, C2H5OH, appropriate shelter, foxtel, my
truck, my dirt bike - all I need/use in life.
You do realize that a lot of work activities are simply not
required. I once heard a comment along the lines of "put all
this effort into it, it won't float, but you made an income
from it, the other team won, however everyone still made a
profit"
During my life I've been on both sides.
These days, I'm not sure I care.
These days the world is such an overpopulated place, you
would be lucky to rent a place, let alone own one. I don't
know what it is like in the US, however folk at the place I
was working at could never even consider buying their own
property, they rent.
So I'm kinda fortunate in that regard.
Invest in property is all I can say.
.
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 04:13:26 PM |
|
|
_/ the_dawggie <the_dawggie@hotmail.com> wrote \_
<snip>
You forgot to say "Things are ok", David.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 02:10:38 PM |
|
|
the_dawggie wrote:
BoredToTears wrote:
On 17 Dec, 17:03, slunky <slu...@globalzero.org> wrote:
_/ BoredToTears <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote \_
On 17 Dec, 08:23, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
DSM-IV-TV.
Tell me, why do you place so much faith in that particular
"diagnosis" when the book it comes from is written by doctors who
you have stated are all quacks? This I do not understand and it
seems to me you just like the idea of being able to point to a
reference in a book or on- line and say, "there, that's me" when
anyone asks what your problem is. You're trying to justify your
odd behaviour instead of looking for an answer to it. Stop
fannying around and get to a doctor.
First off, there's no such thing as a DSM-IV-TV. Secondly, he hasn't
actually read the *DSM-IV-TR*. He's looked up short disgnositic
criteria off the web from it which totals about 1% of the book.
--
-slunky
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest. What does surprise me is
that someone who seems to be in such distress *WILL NOT* get help. I
do no understand. Well, there is an explanation but I like to give
everyone the benefit of the doubt.
I've read multiple references to it on the web (I do that with
everything I research and cross check), tick off the check
boxes. I've even seen a CI show in the last couple of days that
had a quack that described the name and attributes as well, she
described what I already know. I'm not a total dummy, I can blow
my nose and wipe my arse. If I go to a shrink they are just going
to tell me what I already know. I have also read that meds are not
really going to help me.
So Dr Slunky, what advice and meds do you have on offer, apart
from suggesting I see a shrink?
what does it matter you'll just typically say no
.
|
|
|
| User: "the_dawggie" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 02:51:34 PM |
|
|
% wrote:
the_dawggie wrote:
BoredToTears wrote:
On 17 Dec, 17:03, slunky <slu...@globalzero.org> wrote:
_/ BoredToTears <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote \_
On 17 Dec, 08:23, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
DSM-IV-TV.
Tell me, why do you place so much faith in that particular
"diagnosis" when the book it comes from is written by doctors who
you have stated are all quacks? This I do not understand and it
seems to me you just like the idea of being able to point to a
reference in a book or on- line and say, "there, that's me" when
anyone asks what your problem is. You're trying to justify your
odd behaviour instead of looking for an answer to it. Stop
fannying around and get to a doctor.
First off, there's no such thing as a DSM-IV-TV. Secondly, he hasn't
actually read the *DSM-IV-TR*. He's looked up short disgnositic
criteria off the web from it which totals about 1% of the book.
--
-slunky
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest. What does surprise me is
that someone who seems to be in such distress *WILL NOT* get help. I
do no understand. Well, there is an explanation but I like to give
everyone the benefit of the doubt.
I've read multiple references to it on the web (I do that with
everything I research and cross check), tick off the check
boxes. I've even seen a CI show in the last couple of days that
had a quack that described the name and attributes as well, she
described what I already know. I'm not a total dummy, I can blow
my nose and wipe my arse. If I go to a shrink they are just going
to tell me what I already know. I have also read that meds are not
really going to help me.
So Dr Slunky, what advice and meds do you have on offer, apart
from suggesting I see a shrink?
what does it matter you'll just typically say no
Well, you guys can give it a shot, as to what you suspect
I am. Cyberhive was able to tell me, then I did the research.
Ruling out substance abuse is a critical step, I abuse the C2H5OH
a bit, and in the past went on the hooch. Almost all the criteria
to describe the problem I've had for my entire life though, taking
out those factors. So I can't say what I have is substance abuse,
otherwise you would have it too. It likely contributes to my problems,
however would not be a primary factor.
So what is going to happen? go to the hospital, see a shrink,
get some sort of substance reliance that likely won't work.
I'm not seeing a lot of answers here from the "experts"
Go to a quack
Go to a quack
Go to a quack
Go to a quack
For I = 1 to 100
print "Go to a quack"
Next I
.
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 03:25:13 PM |
|
|
_/ the_dawggie <the_dawggie@hotmail.com> wrote \_
Well, you guys can give it a shot, as to what you suspect
I am. Cyberhive was able to tell me, then I did the research.
Nobody here is a doctor, and doctors never diagnose off the net anyways.
It doesn't work. Besides, you haven't said a shred of truth. How would
anyone know you from lies and contridictions?
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 03:30:03 PM |
|
|
slunky wrote:
_/ the_dawggie <the_dawggie@hotmail.com> wrote \_
Well, you guys can give it a shot, as to what you suspect
I am. Cyberhive was able to tell me, then I did the research.
Nobody here is a doctor, and doctors never diagnose off the net
anyways. It doesn't work. Besides, you haven't said a shred of truth.
How would anyone know you from lies and contridictions?
yea but this is his only attention seeking game he has ,
and who doesn't like playing guess what's wrong with me ,
i wonder if he broke his leg would he say no , no doctor ,
my leg is broke so fixing it is useless besides a doctor can't fix it
its broke
.
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 03:32:57 PM |
|
|
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_
yea but this is his only attention seeking game he has ,
and who doesn't like playing guess what's wrong with me ,
i wonder if he broke his leg would he say no , no doctor ,
my leg is broke so fixing it is useless besides a doctor can't fix it
its broke
He'd fix it himself by reading Geocities webpages about broken arms and
say "Hey, that's me!" and then he'd come back here and complain that he
has a broken arm and it's unfixable.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 03:38:46 PM |
|
|
slunky wrote:
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_
yea but this is his only attention seeking game he has ,
and who doesn't like playing guess what's wrong with me ,
i wonder if he broke his leg would he say no , no doctor ,
my leg is broke so fixing it is useless besides a doctor can't fix it
its broke
He'd fix it himself by reading Geocities webpages about broken arms
and say "Hey, that's me!" and then he'd come back here and complain
that he has a broken arm and it's unfixable.
yea but only in between saying everything that's wrong with him ,
like his severe typical uniqueness , i really am surprised though ,
that a guy that needs so much attention wouldn't go to a shrink ,
where he really could be the center of it
.
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 03:46:59 PM |
|
|
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_
yea but only in between saying everything that's wrong with him ,
like his severe typical uniqueness , i really am surprised though ,
that a guy that needs so much attention wouldn't go to a shrink ,
where he really could be the center of it
A doc would spoil all the fun in his what else can I have now game.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 03:00:59 PM |
|
|
the_dawggie wrote:
% wrote:
the_dawggie wrote:
BoredToTears wrote:
On 17 Dec, 17:03, slunky <slu...@globalzero.org> wrote:
_/ BoredToTears <beejayce...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote \_
On 17 Dec, 08:23, the_dawggie <the_dawg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
DSM-IV-TV.
Tell me, why do you place so much faith in that particular
"diagnosis" when the book it comes from is written by doctors who
you have stated are all quacks? This I do not understand and it
seems to me you just like the idea of being able to point to a
reference in a book or on- line and say, "there, that's me" when
anyone asks what your problem is. You're trying to justify your
odd behaviour instead of looking for an answer to it. Stop
fannying around and get to a doctor.
First off, there's no such thing as a DSM-IV-TV. Secondly, he
hasn't actually read the *DSM-IV-TR*. He's looked up short
disgnositic criteria off the web from it which totals about 1% of
the book.
--
-slunky
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest. What does surprise me is
that someone who seems to be in such distress *WILL NOT* get help.
I do no understand. Well, there is an explanation but I like to
give everyone the benefit of the doubt.
I've read multiple references to it on the web (I do that with
everything I research and cross check), tick off the check
boxes. I've even seen a CI show in the last couple of days that
had a quack that described the name and attributes as well, she
described what I already know. I'm not a total dummy, I can blow
my nose and wipe my arse. If I go to a shrink they are just going
to tell me what I already know. I have also read that meds are not
really going to help me.
So Dr Slunky, what advice and meds do you have on offer, apart
from suggesting I see a shrink?
what does it matter you'll just typically say no
Well, you guys can give it a shot, as to what you suspect
I am. Cyberhive was able to tell me, then I did the research.
Ruling out substance abuse is a critical step, I abuse the C2H5OH
a bit, and in the past went on the hooch. Almost all the criteria
to describe the problem I've had for my entire life though, taking
out those factors. So I can't say what I have is substance abuse,
otherwise you would have it too. It likely contributes to my problems,
however would not be a primary factor.
So what is going to happen? go to the hospital, see a shrink,
get some sort of substance reliance that likely won't work.
I'm not seeing a lot of answers here from the "experts"
Go to a quack
Go to a quack
Go to a quack
Go to a quack
For I = 1 to 100
print "Go to a quack"
Next I
i'm not a shrink so i can't say ,
but you need one and you know it ,
but you're too afraid to find out your truth ,
and by the way like i said ,
you'll just typically say no ,
and you typically did , so predictably
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "slunky" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
17 Dec 2007 02:53:24 PM |
|
|
_/ BoredToTears <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote \_
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest. What does surprise me is
that someone who seems to be in such distress *WILL NOT* get help. I
do no understand. Well, there is an explanation but I like to give
everyone the benefit of the doubt.
I think the answer is evident to most people here.
--
-slunky
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
16 Dec 2007 09:05:30 PM |
|
|
the_dawggie wrote:
cal wrote:
On 12/16/07 5:13 PM, in article
4004e4cb-0fba-40fc-aaa2-5ec2b00be13f@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com, "aj
suburban dude" <suburbanlife@mail.com> wrote:
On Dec 16, 4:29 am, Miserable Man <misem...@misery.net> wrote:
The politically correct greeting is "Happy Holidays", which has
come to replace "Merry Christmas" in this country. This is because
the Jews don't like "Merry Christmas", which excludes them.
I have never said "Happy Holidays", and I never will.
---
Miserable Man
I don't like political correctness myself,
I also, usually, don't say happy holidays.
i say "happy holidays" when i don't know if the other person is
christian. if i do, and i know it means something to them, i say,
"merry christmas."
not being christian, i prefer that people say "happy holidays" to
me. if someone who doesn't know me says "merry christmas," i see it
as a minor faux pas but it happens all the time so i just say "you
too." if someone knows i'm jewish and still says "merry christmas"
to me, i get offended. but that practically never happens. most
people are pretty cool that way.
however, my reasons are NOT for the same reasons as you.
You twisted it into something anti-Jewish when that's not how it
actually is.
Political correctness is not a Jewish conspiracy,
but that's another topic.
political correctness is just the practice of being considerate,
accepting and respectful toward others in a multi-faith,
multi-ethnic, multi-cultural society.
"politically correct" can be reframed as "the language of equality",
but people get fed up with the seemingly mincing rules and regs of
observance. i say it comes down to something very simple. to speak
the language of equality, you have to visualize equality and you
have to believe it. then you'll take to the language like a duck to
water.
I know how to be "politically correct" in real life, be friendly
to other real life folk. Visulise the false and real self. It's
a hard act to follow, however you {i} have to do it.
It scares the shite out of me. I have to concentrate on being
someone I'm not.
you do the same thing here
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "aj suburban dude" |
|
| Title: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
16 Dec 2007 04:22:16 PM |
|
|
btw i know why your toilet is always getting clogged up.
your ***** clogs it up everytime you take a dump.
your place must smell great.
.
|
|
|
| User: "the_dawggie" |
|
| Title: Re: Miserable Milliepede refuses to be a decent person |
16 Dec 2007 05:16:49 PM |
|
|
aj suburban dude wrote:
btw i know why your toilet is always getting clogged up.
your ***** clogs it up everytime you take a dump.
your place must smell great.
I was wondering about that.
I think MM should host some photos of his zoo<del><del><del>
appartment, and we can give some handy cleaning/decluttering
hints :-)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "dorrie9" |
|
| Title: Re: I refuse to be politically correct |
16 Dec 2007 06:39:22 AM |
|
|
On Dec 16, 6:29 am, Miserable Man <misem...@misery.net> wrote:
The politically correct greeting is "Happy Holidays", which has come
to replace "Merry Christmas" in this country. This is because the Jews
don't like "Merry Christmas", which excludes them.
I have never said "Happy Holidays", and I never will.
---
Miserable Man
I am with you. Merry Christmas it will always be for me. If the Jews
or any one else doesn't like it so be it. They have their own holidays
and I have no problem with them celebrating them. dorrie
.
|
|
|
| User: "RGB" |
|
| Title: Re: I refuse to be politically correct |
16 Dec 2007 11:08:34 AM |
|
|
In article
<9664a196-0911-4d3c-8876-b61f3d5405c4@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
dorrie9 <catsruledk@gmail.com> wrote:
I am with you. Merry Christmas it will always be for me. If the Jews
or any one else doesn't like it so be it. They have their own holidays
and I have no problem with them celebrating them. dorrie
You sure you're "with him"? He wants all "the Jews" dead, do you?
.
|
|
|
| User: "punk" |
|
| Title: Re: I refuse to be politically correct |
16 Dec 2007 12:25:34 PM |
|
|
On Dec 16, 12:08 pm, RGB <-...@-.-> wrote:
In article
<9664a196-0911-4d3c-8876-b61f3d540...@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
dorrie9 <catsrul...@gmail.com> wrote:
I am with you. Merry Christmas it will always be for me. If the Jews
or any one else doesn't like it so be it. They have their own holidays
and I have no problem with them celebrating them. dorrie
You sure you're "with him"? He wants all "the Jews" dead, do you?
i'm sure she just means on the merry christmas thing...
.
|
|
|
| User: "RGB" |
|
| Title: Re: I refuse to be politically correct |
16 Dec 2007 01:11:52 PM |
|
|
In article
<ea5d161a-ee05-46c9-ba49-fbbc8e829121@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
punk <punkbebe@gmail.com> wrote:
I am with you. Merry Christmas it will always be for me. If the Jews
or any one else doesn't like it so be it. They have their own holidays
and I have no problem with them celebrating them. dorrie
You sure you're "with him"? He wants all "the Jews" dead, do you?
i'm sure she just means on the merry christmas thing...
I'm sure she does, too. But considering that this bit of Christmas
cheer was coming from ASD's resident neo-Nazi and would-be gas chamber
operator, the background seemed relevant. Besides, there's a tone to
claims about what "the Jews" do or do not like that's suggestive and
kind of ugly in itself.
Mark
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "\jordy" |
|
| Title: Re: I refuse to be politically correct |
17 Dec 2007 12:16:41 PM |
|
|
On Dec 16, 7:39 am, dorrie9 <catsrul...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 16, 6:29 am, Miserable Man <misem...@misery.net> wrote:
The politically correct greeting is "Happy Holidays", which has come
to replace "Merry Christmas" in this country. This is because the Jews
don't like "Merry Christmas", which excludes them.
I have never said "Happy Holidays", and I never will.
---
Miserable Man
I am with you. Merry Christmas it will always be for me. If the Jews
or any one else doesn't like it so be it. They have their own holidays
and I have no problem with them celebrating them. dorrie
I have a close friend named "dorrie". I'm very happy that she would
never say anything like this.
-"Jordy"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michelle la Belle" |
|
| Title: Re: I refuse to be politically correct |
16 Dec 2007 06:57:40 AM |
|
|
On Dec 16, 7:39 am, dorrie9 <catsrul...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 16, 6:29 am, Miserable Man <misem...@misery.net> wrote:
The politically correct greeting is "Happy Holidays", which has come
to replace "Merry Christmas" in this country. This is because the Jews
don't like "Merry Christmas", which excludes them.
I have never said "Happy Holidays", and I never will.
---
Miserable Man
I am with you. Merry Christmas it will always be for me. If the Jews
or any one else doesn't like it so be it. They have their own holidays
and I have no problem with them celebrating them. dorrie
I'm not Christian but I don't object to "Merry Christmas". It's got
so much more of a ring to it than "Happy Holidays".
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
