| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"Alan Harding" |
| Date: |
01 Oct 2005 12:12:32 PM |
| Object: |
If the media believe the officials... |
and the officials believe rumour and uncorroborated hearsay, who
apologises to whom?
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4292114.stm
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
| User: "Contrarian" |
|
| Title: Re: If the media believe the officials... |
02 Oct 2005 02:30:02 AM |
|
|
Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
and the officials believe rumour and uncorroborated hearsay, who
apologises to whom?
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4292114.stm
reposting so I can take alook. maybe I will
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4292114.stm
--
but the edge is still Out there. Or maybe it's In... HST (1967)
when i got to the edge , i built a deck % (2005)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: If the media believe the officials... |
02 Oct 2005 08:51:01 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 18:12:32 +0100, Alan Harding
<Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote:
<(((*> and the officials believe rumour and uncorroborated hearsay, who
<(((*> apologises to whom?
<(((*>
<(((*> news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4292114.stm
About a decade ago, when a major Canadian politician was rushed
to hospital becaise he was infected with the flesh-eating
bacterium, a similar streak of rumours made it into our news
broadcasts.
By similar I don't mean they were reporting that he was running
amok in the hospital raping little girls. First they reported the
truth, that he was critically ill and his leg had been amputated
to save his life; he was on serious antibiotics and the doctors
weren't sure if there was time enough for them to work.
The subsequent news reports became more and more extreme: he had
lost the other leg, then both arms, then half his chest cavity,
his condition was deteriorating from critical to edge of the
grave.
None of the subsequent stories were true, but they were reported
as fact. No one ever explained how these exaggerations and lies
received so much credibility.
I would explain it as follows:
The human propensity for exaggeration kicks in, something like
the game of telephone, where person A's speculation is developed
by person B before being passed on, interpreted as fact by person
C, and finally received by person D in a form quite different
from its origins.
The media need to have something progressive to report; just
repeating the same story over and again doesn't maintain ratings.
So they're more likely to report what person D says than they are
to follow the story back up the chain to learn that what person A
really said was along the lines of, "If we don't improve security
in here, there will be rapes and murders."
I hope that folks in the US will look a little deeper into how
this kind of misinformation got spread around. It's a mechanism
that affects how all of us get our news.
Tara J. Ballance
Montreal, Canada
.
|
|
|
| User: "Janithor" |
|
| Title: Re: If the media believe the officials... |
04 Oct 2005 06:18:25 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
waitingforgodot@samuel.beckett wrote:
About a decade ago, when a major Canadian politician was rushed
to hospital becaise he was infected with the flesh-eating
bacterium, a similar streak of rumours made it into our news
broadcasts.
By similar I don't mean they were reporting that he was running
amok in the hospital raping little girls. First they reported the
truth, that he was critically ill and his leg had been amputated
to save his life; he was on serious antibiotics and the doctors
weren't sure if there was time enough for them to work.
The subsequent news reports became more and more extreme: he had
lost the other leg, then both arms, then half his chest cavity,
his condition was deteriorating from critical to edge of the
grave.
None of the subsequent stories were true, but they were reported
as fact. No one ever explained how these exaggerations and lies
received so much credibility.
I would explain it as follows:
The human propensity for exaggeration kicks in, something like
the game of telephone, where person A's speculation is developed
by person B before being passed on, interpreted as fact by person
C, and finally received by person D in a form quite different
from its origins.
Middle of day, someone poops in the toilet and leaves some nastiness in
the bowl. In the middle of the day. Well after the janitors had left
the night before. After many people had used the bathroom before this
particular event occurred.
Tenant calling property management firm: "The janitor didn't clean the
bathrooms last night. The place looks like a truck stop."
Secretary of property manager to property manager: "The janitor didn't
clean the bathrooms last night."
Property manager to janitor: "Why didn't you clean the bathrooms last
night?! You're on probation!"*
(* true story)
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|