| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"Bacon" |
| Date: |
18 Sep 2006 06:23:23 PM |
| Object: |
Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
.
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
18 Sep 2006 06:24:46 PM |
|
|
"Bacon" <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:oa9ug29probm0a8gom7tb3valme7ag51fs@4ax.com...
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
it'll do a whole lot more than that if its a kept promise
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 10:25:00 AM |
|
|
Bacon wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
that sounds good... as long as democrats take control of congress
and the presidency, things will improve, at least somewhat...
-"jordy"
.
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 02:05:11 PM |
|
|
On 19 Sep 2006 08:25:00 -0700, wrote:
Bacon wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
that sounds good... as long as democrats take control of congress
and the presidency, things will improve, at least somewhat...
Yet there isn't a single Democrat that can state what their policy would
be.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
20 Sep 2006 01:21:06 AM |
|
|
In message <4qf0h29m009c2l17h3khufqbiaakij73oa@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On 19 Sep 2006 08:25:00 -0700, wrote:
Bacon wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
that sounds good... as long as democrats take control of congress
and the presidency, things will improve, at least somewhat...
Yet there isn't a single Democrat that can state what their policy would
be.
Flexible? Pragmatic? :-)
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
18 Sep 2006 11:58:55 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 01:51:00 AM |
|
|
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with Israel?
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 02:02:22 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:51:00 +0100, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with Israel?
No, they don't. I haven't seen any Israeli officials stating that Iran
should be wiped from the map.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
22 Sep 2006 04:52:20 PM |
|
|
CyberDroog wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:51:00 +0100, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with Israel?
No, they don't. I haven't seen any Israeli officials stating that Iran
should be wiped from the map.
Maybe it's not so, but Ahmadinejad, when you listen to him, seems
very reasonable... I love what Hugo Chavez had to say the other day...
It was also a funny speach...
-"Jordy"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
21 Sep 2006 02:51:25 AM |
|
|
In message <kkf0h25sqopam5isar4k0tk4nfdqvq02id@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 07:51:00 +0100, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with Israel?
No, they don't. I haven't seen any Israeli officials stating that Iran
should be wiped from the map.
Did they announce that they wanted to ridicule themselves in the eyes of
the entire Arab world by showing themselves incapable of defeating an
amateur army?
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "CyberDroog" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
21 Sep 2006 01:15:52 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:51:25 +0100, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
In message <kkf0h25sqopam5isar4k0tk4nfdqvq02id@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
No, they don't. I haven't seen any Israeli officials stating that Iran
should be wiped from the map.
Did they announce that they wanted to ridicule themselves in the eyes of
the entire Arab world by showing themselves incapable of defeating an
amateur army?
That is amusing, and just what I would expect. Israel goes in to take out
Hezbollah and the world immediately calls them criminals and demands a
cease-fire. A cease-fire is declared, and Israel is then declared the loser
when they pull out.
That is the kind of thing I mean with the rhetoric about much of Europe
wishing the holocaust had succeeded.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
21 Sep 2006 03:11:28 PM |
|
|
In message <agl5h2til7674slveqgffom6q4ob8nto0i@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:51:25 +0100, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
In message <kkf0h25sqopam5isar4k0tk4nfdqvq02id@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
No, they don't. I haven't seen any Israeli officials stating that Iran
should be wiped from the map.
Did they announce that they wanted to ridicule themselves in the eyes of
the entire Arab world by showing themselves incapable of defeating an
amateur army?
That is amusing, and just what I would expect. Israel goes in to take out
Hezbollah and the world immediately calls them criminals and demands a
cease-fire. A cease-fire is declared, and Israel is then declared the loser
when they pull out.
That is the kind of thing I mean with the rhetoric about much of Europe
wishing the holocaust had succeeded.
Are you on something Droog? You aren't usually this persistently a pain
in the arse.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
22 Sep 2006 02:26:19 AM |
|
|
"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:QncPb7KwHvEFFweo@harding.demon.co.uk...
In message <agl5h2til7674slveqgffom6q4ob8nto0i@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:51:25 +0100, Alan Harding
<Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
In message <kkf0h25sqopam5isar4k0tk4nfdqvq02id@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
No, they don't. I haven't seen any Israeli officials stating that Iran
should be wiped from the map.
Did they announce that they wanted to ridicule themselves in the eyes of
the entire Arab world by showing themselves incapable of defeating an
amateur army?
That is amusing, and just what I would expect. Israel goes in to take out
Hezbollah and the world immediately calls them criminals and demands a
cease-fire. A cease-fire is declared, and Israel is then declared the
loser
when they pull out.
That is the kind of thing I mean with the rhetoric about much of Europe
wishing the holocaust had succeeded.
Are you on something Droog? You aren't usually this persistently a pain
in the arse.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
did anybody burp the Alan
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Dehn" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
21 Sep 2006 07:20:30 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
"CyberDroog" <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:51:25 +0100, Alan Harding <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk>
wrote:
In message <kkf0h25sqopam5isar4k0tk4nfdqvq02id@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
No, they don't. I haven't seen any Israeli officials stating that Iran
should be wiped from the map.
Did they announce that they wanted to ridicule themselves in the eyes of
the entire Arab world by showing themselves incapable of defeating an
amateur army?
That is amusing, and just what I would expect. Israel goes in to take out
Hezbollah and the world immediately calls them criminals and demands a
cease-fire. A cease-fire is declared, and Israel is then declared the loser
when they pull out.
Thats just what I would expect, but its not amusing.
Israel went into Lebanon to destroy Lebanese infrastructure.
Taking out Hezbollah that way is simply not possible.
Hezbollah is a terrorist organisation, not a regular army.
A terrorist in civilian clothes does not look any different to
a non-terrorist civilian.
Israel was declared the loser because they couldn't even stop
Hezbollah firing missiles.
Thomas
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Janithor" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 02:18:02 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with Israel?
I think you got it backwards.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 02:27:20 AM |
|
|
"Janithor" <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:450F99A4.80401@comcast.net...
x-no-archive: yes
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with Israel?
I think you got it backwards.
forward , backward ,
all i see is ,
Americans ,
killing people in a foreign land ,
of course not around here ,
cause , well you know how many times ,
the Canadians kicked the American ***** already, if not ,
do a search on the war of 1812 , or ,
the slaughter at Niagra , not to mention ,
all that Ohio Valley fun ,
in fact , when was the last time ,
them freakin wannabes won one , they blew nam ,
they just haven't had a win in a long time
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Janithor" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 02:27:09 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Estimated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 02:31:39 AM |
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Estimate
d_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
and i believe every web site i see because ,
there's no lying in wiki web sites
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "BoredToTears" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 04:20:12 PM |
|
|
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Estimated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
I live within 40 miles of the UK's Trident nuclear sub base. If, under
some terrible concatenation of events, they have an accident, I'll be
vapourised. And if there's a nuclear war? I'll be one of the first to
be vapourised. No worries about radiation sickness for me. That thought
keeps me warm in my bed at night...
.
|
|
|
| User: "justabeing" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 04:29:59 PM |
|
|
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1158700812.901426.132460@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with
Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Estimated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
I live within 40 miles of the UK's Trident nuclear sub base. If, under
some terrible concatenation of events, they have an accident, I'll be
vapourised. And if there's a nuclear war? I'll be one of the first to
be vapourised. No worries about radiation sickness for me. That thought
keeps me warm in my bed at night...
i live less than 150 miles from the Hanford Nuclear dump and
reactor...........
isn't THAT special lol
.
|
|
|
| User: "Alan Harding" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
20 Sep 2006 01:19:48 AM |
|
|
In message <rjZPg.3312$e66.982@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, justabeing
<just.a.being@gmail.com> writes
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1158700812.901426.132460@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Janithor wrote:
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with
Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Es
timated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
I live within 40 miles of the UK's Trident nuclear sub base. If, under
some terrible concatenation of events, they have an accident, I'll be
vapourised. And if there's a nuclear war? I'll be one of the first to
be vapourised. No worries about radiation sickness for me. That thought
keeps me warm in my bed at night...
i live less than 150 miles from the Hanford Nuclear dump and
reactor...........
isn't THAT special lol
5 miles from the Vickers tank factory.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Justin Case ." |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
20 Sep 2006 02:16:44 AM |
|
|
"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:$HhEDADE2NEFFwYi@harding.demon.co.uk...
In message <rjZPg.3312$e66.982@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, justabeing
<just.a.being@gmail.com> writes
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1158700812.901426.132460@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Janithor wrote:
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that
problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put
together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms,
how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with
Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Es
timated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
I live within 40 miles of the UK's Trident nuclear sub base. If, under
some terrible concatenation of events, they have an accident, I'll be
vapourised. And if there's a nuclear war? I'll be one of the first to
be vapourised. No worries about radiation sickness for me. That thought
keeps me warm in my bed at night...
i live less than 150 miles from the Hanford Nuclear dump and
reactor...........
isn't THAT special lol
5 miles from the Vickers tank factory.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
12 kilometres from Carlton United Breweries, nuclear holocaust, bring it
on!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Kett" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
25 Sep 2006 08:20:55 PM |
|
|
Justin Case wrote:
"Alan Harding" <Alan@harding.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:$HhEDADE2NEFFwYi@harding.demon.co.uk...
In message <rjZPg.3312$e66.982@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>, justabeing
<just.a.being@gmail.com> writes
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1158700812.901426.132460@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Janithor wrote:
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that
problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put
together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms,
how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with
Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Es
timated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
I live within 40 miles of the UK's Trident nuclear sub base. If, under
some terrible concatenation of events, they have an accident, I'll be
vapourised. And if there's a nuclear war? I'll be one of the first to
be vapourised. No worries about radiation sickness for me. That thought
keeps me warm in my bed at night...
i live less than 150 miles from the Hanford Nuclear dump and
reactor...........
isn't THAT special lol
5 miles from the Vickers tank factory.
--
The opinions given above may be mine. They might also
just be what I feel like saying right now, okay?
12 kilometres from Carlton United Breweries, nuclear holocaust, bring it
on!
3 city blocks from the vodka store LOL
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ivan Marsh" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 05:07:43 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:29:59 +0000, justabeing wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1158700812.901426.132460@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with
Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Estimated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
I live within 40 miles of the UK's Trident nuclear sub base. If, under
some terrible concatenation of events, they have an accident, I'll be
vapourised. And if there's a nuclear war? I'll be one of the first to
be vapourised. No worries about radiation sickness for me. That thought
keeps me warm in my bed at night...
i live less than 150 miles from the Hanford Nuclear dump and
reactor...........
isn't THAT special lol
I live in the middle of a field of $283,000,000,000.00 worth of ICBMs...
we call it the mid-west.
.
|
|
|
| User: "BoredToTears" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 05:16:06 PM |
|
|
Ivan Marsh wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:29:59 +0000, justabeing wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1158700812.901426.132460@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with
Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Estimated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
I live within 40 miles of the UK's Trident nuclear sub base. If, under
some terrible concatenation of events, they have an accident, I'll be
vapourised. And if there's a nuclear war? I'll be one of the first to
be vapourised. No worries about radiation sickness for me. That thought
keeps me warm in my bed at night...
i live less than 150 miles from the Hanford Nuclear dump and
reactor...........
isn't THAT special lol
I live in the middle of a field of $283,000,000,000.00 worth of ICBMs...
we call it the mid-west.
I reckon, if there's a nuclear war, you'll get vapourised just a bit
before me. You win! ;)--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ivan Marsh" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
20 Sep 2006 10:26:02 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:16:06 -0700, BoredToTears wrote:
Ivan Marsh wrote:
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:29:59 +0000, justabeing wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1158700812.901426.132460@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Alan Harding wrote:
In message
<j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that
will win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian
flag on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing
with Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve
that problem easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put
together and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having
nuclear arms, how about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows
about. If the USA needed lots for stability with the Soviets,
doesn't Iran need them with Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Estimated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
I live within 40 miles of the UK's Trident nuclear sub base. If,
under some terrible concatenation of events, they have an accident,
I'll be vapourised. And if there's a nuclear war? I'll be one of the
first to be vapourised. No worries about radiation sickness for me.
That thought keeps me warm in my bed at night...
i live less than 150 miles from the Hanford Nuclear dump and
reactor...........
isn't THAT special lol
I live in the middle of a field of $283,000,000,000.00 worth of
ICBMs... we call it the mid-west.
I reckon, if there's a nuclear war, you'll get vapourised just a bit
before me. You win! ;)--
Well... I guess that depends on whether the Boomers (Trident submarines)
are in the right positions during the first strike. According to the
report Bush and Cheney requested from the DoD shortly after taking office
it only takes one, about three minutes, to peel the top soil off of the
entire former Soviet Union... anyone else see that article in Time
magazine?
Apparently Bush and Cheney asked for a nuclear readiness report for an
assessment of the US nuclear capability (a very reassuring first act of a
President). The DoD sent them back an assessment of a single US trident
submarine first strike against the former Soviet Union. I can't remember
the exact numbers but there's something like 140-170 missiles per boat,
each missile has, at least, 10 re-entry vehicles in it, and there are, at
least, 8 boats in the water at all times. The projection of casualties was
65-85% of the population dead at detonation.
So, I think we can all rest assured that if there is ever a full blown
nuclear war there won't be many of us left to play out our post
apocalyptic Mad Max fantasies.
Sadly, mutually assured destruction is the viable deterrent they said it
would be... if not a completely insane one.
There's no need to fear someone who wants a thousand nuclear weapons...
you should be terrified of anyone who only wants one.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Dehn" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 11:04:01 PM |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
"Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote:
I live in the middle of a field of $283,000,000,000.00 worth of ICBMs...
we call it the mid-west.
Do these ICBMs still point towards Massachusetts? ;-)
Thomas
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ivan Marsh" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
20 Sep 2006 01:39:21 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:04:01 +0200, Thomas Dehn wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
"Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> wrote:
I live in the middle of a field of $283,000,000,000.00 worth of
ICBMs... we call it the mid-west.
Do these ICBMs still point towards Massachusetts? ;-)
It doesn't much matter where they're aimed.
It's scary that they figured out about a year ago that many of the launch
codes were set to 0000-0000-0000-0000... it's always a good thing to set
your launch codes to the first thing a brute force crack would try.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jesters mummy" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
20 Sep 2006 05:51:24 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:39:21 -0500, Ivan Marsh <annoyed@you.now> wrote:
<(((*>On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:04:01 +0200, Thomas Dehn wrote:
<(((*>
<(((*>> x-no-archive: yes
In my headers
<(((*>> Do these ICBMs still point towards Massachusetts? ;-)
<(((*>
<(((*>It doesn't much matter where they're aimed.
<(((*>
<(((*>It's scary that they figured out about a year ago that many of the launch
<(((*>codes were set to 0000-0000-0000-0000... it's always a good thing to set
<(((*>your launch codes to the first thing a brute force crack would try.
Ivan, are you serious? That's the launch code they came up with?????
Why, oh why does this remind me of Spaceballs?
Here, courtesy of the Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com) let me tell you why
this reminds me of Spaceballs:
[King Roland has given in to Dark Helmet's threats, and is telling him the
combination to the "air shield"]
Roland: One.
Dark Helmet: One.
Colonel Sandurz: One.
Roland: Two.
Dark Helmet: Two.
Colonel Sandurz: Two.
Roland: Three.
Dark Helmet: Three.
Colonel Sandurz: Three.
Roland: Four.
Dark Helmet: Four.
Colonel Sandurz: Four.
Roland: Five.
Dark Helmet: Five.
Colonel Sandurz: Five.
Dark Helmet: So the combination is one, two, three, four, five? That's the
stupidest combination I've ever heard in my life! The kind of thing an idiot
would have on his luggage!
President Skroob: [enters after the interrogation of King Roland] Well? Did it
work? Where's the king?
Dark Helmet: It worked, sir. We have the combination.
President Skroob: Great. Now we can take every last breath of fresh air from
planet Druidia. What's the combination?
Dark Helmet: 1 2 3 4 5.
President Skroob: 1 2 3 4 5? That's amazing! I've got the same combination on my
luggage! Prepare Spaceball 1 for immediate departure!
Dark Helmet: Yes, sir!
President Skroob: And change the combination on my luggage!
Tara J. Ballance
Montreal, Canada
I love Mel Brooks
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ivan Marsh" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
21 Sep 2006 11:08:17 AM |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:51:24 -0400, Jester's mummy wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:39:21 -0500, Ivan Marsh <annoyed@you.now> wrote:
<(((*>On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:04:01 +0200, Thomas Dehn wrote: <(((*>
<(((*>> x-no-archive: yes
In my headers
<(((*>> Do these ICBMs still point towards Massachusetts? ;-) <(((*>
<(((*>It doesn't much matter where they're aimed. <(((*> <(((*>It's
scary that they figured out about a year ago that many of the launch
<(((*>codes were set to 0000-0000-0000-0000... it's always a good thing
to set <(((*>your launch codes to the first thing a brute force crack
would try.
Ivan, are you serious? That's the launch code they came up with?????
Sadly, yes. The Minuteman missiles were set to all zeros by SAC for
convenience for nearly 20 years and any silo operator could have launched
at will.
It cracks me up when ever I see "that scene" in any film about a missile
launch... open your orders, break open the red code package, confirm
orders against code line, verify code sequence against fail safe, insert
keys, turn keys at the same time... nope, sorry: read post-it! note on
console, enter: 00000000, push red button.
You're going to love the title of this article. This isn't the original
article I read but it does contain some excerpts from the DoD report:
http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=167
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BoredToTears" |
|
| Title: Re: Immediate and Unconditional Withdrawl from Iraq |
19 Sep 2006 04:40:23 PM |
|
|
justabeing wrote:
"BoredToTears" <beejayceee1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1158700812.901426.132460@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Janithor wrote:
x-no-archive: yes
Alan Harding wrote:
In message <j0uug21d7sh25mv57lhrh33me6mpqhdfv5@news.easynews.com>,
CyberDroog <CyberDroog@ClockworkOrange.com> writes
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:23:23 -0500, Bacon <rbkfour@yahoo.com> wrote:
Regardless of regional consequences...that's the platform that will
win the next presidential election...
And just to show our goodwill, we should help hoist the Iranian flag
on all
Iraqi government buildings before we leave.
Another important part of the platform is all of this arguing with
Ahmadinejad over him trying to create nukes. We can solve that problem
easily. Just give him some of ours.
The USA does have rather a lot. Like the rest of the world put together
and then some. And if we're worried about Iran having nuclear arms, how
about Israels' 'secret' that everyone knows about. If the USA needed
lots for stability with the Soviets, doesn't Iran need them with
Israel?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_nuclear_weapons#Estimated_worldwide_nuclear_stockpiles
I live within 40 miles of the UK's Trident nuclear sub base. If, under
some terrible concatenation of events, they have an accident, I'll be
vapourised. And if there's a nuclear war? I'll be one of the first to
be vapourised. No worries about radiation sickness for me. That thought
keeps me warm in my bed at night...
i live less than 150 miles from the Hanford Nuclear dump and
reactor...........
isn't THAT special lol
I reckon my "blow-up-ability" beats yours, lol
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
