| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
11 Oct 2007 04:19:34 PM |
| Object: |
it's time for this NG |
to improve itself, or else.
some of you may expect private communications.
.
|
|
| User: "David" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 04:27:33 PM |
|
|
Contraian just got notified of you and didn't, yo-yo.
"Contrarian" <adrba65@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:GrwPi.1292$Qr.70@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
to improve itself, or else.
some of you may expect private communications.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "humble.life" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 04:22:49 PM |
|
|
Contrarian wrote:
to improve itself, or else.
some of you may expect private communications.
luna will arrest me if i say anything
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "arethusa" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 10:51:40 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:19:34 GMT, "Contrarian"<adrba65@gmail.com>
wrote:
to improve itself, or else.
some of you may expect private communications.
Demanding better behavior seldom gets the desired result.
Pointing out someone's bad behavior just makes most people defensive.
Shaming someone for their bad behavior doesn't work unless they
already feel ashamed of what they're doing, or at least a little
ashamed.
So what's the answer?
What it's been since a.s.d began.
You don't engage in inappropriate behavior yourself because two wrongs
don't make a right. You be the change which you wish to see in the
world. You use appropriate humor as much as possible to diffuse tense
situations. If you feel you must judge and comment, you judge and
comment on the behavior, not the person's worth as a human being. You
don't threaten because really, what can you do? Report someone to
their ISP? ISPs are a dime a dozen, and if you get them kicked off
one, they'll find another one and come back pissed and all "Ha ha!
Thought you'd stop me? Now I'll be worse than ever!"
Man, no one wishes more than I do that we could control the ways other
people react and feel and behave. We can't. So we control ourselves
and try to maintain our own dignity. We say, once, in as kind a way
as possible that what we see that's wrong with a behavior is upsetting
and counter-productive to what the group is supposed to be. We offer
support where we can, when we can. We try not to let ourselves get
sucked into the slime, we refuse to engage in social interaction with
people with whom we have moral and ethical conflicts because we
realize we can't change them.
And we survive. We let other people make their mistakes and take
responsibility for our own.
You do what you feel you must. I respect the feelings you have
regarding this issue and I wish you all the luck in the world in your
quest.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 10:48:46 PM |
|
|
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:t0rtg3ti83b2o1a7qkvrthhrpvegn00jrg@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:19:34 GMT, "Contrarian"<adrba65@gmail.com>
wrote:
to improve itself, or else.
some of you may expect private communications.
Demanding better behavior seldom gets the desired result.
Pointing out someone's bad behavior just makes most people defensive.
Shaming someone for their bad behavior doesn't work unless they
already feel ashamed of what they're doing, or at least a little
ashamed.
So what's the answer?
What it's been since a.s.d began.
You don't engage in inappropriate behavior yourself because two wrongs
don't make a right. You be the change which you wish to see in the
world. You use appropriate humor as much as possible to diffuse tense
situations. If you feel you must judge and comment, you judge and
comment on the behavior, not the person's worth as a human being. You
don't threaten because really, what can you do? Report someone to
their ISP? ISPs are a dime a dozen, and if you get them kicked off
one, they'll find another one and come back pissed and all "Ha ha!
Thought you'd stop me? Now I'll be worse than ever!"
Man, no one wishes more than I do that we could control the ways other
people react and feel and behave. We can't. So we control ourselves
and try to maintain our own dignity. We say, once, in as kind a way
as possible that what we see that's wrong with a behavior is upsetting
and counter-productive to what the group is supposed to be. We offer
support where we can, when we can. We try not to let ourselves get
sucked into the slime, we refuse to engage in social interaction with
people with whom we have moral and ethical conflicts because we
realize we can't change them.
And we survive. We let other people make their mistakes and take
responsibility for our own.
You do what you feel you must. I respect the feelings you have
regarding this issue and I wish you all the luck in the world in your
quest.
\
hi
.
|
|
|
| User: "arethusa" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 11:02:03 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:48:46 -0700, "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
hi
Either you're testing to see if you've returned to my killfile (and
this response is your answer to that.) or you just want to copy my
entire post for those who use Google and don't see x-no archive posts.
I think I'm still x no archived...
Either way, hello.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 11:01:20 PM |
|
|
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:24stg31oubc992bocr6khpqqong3dn4sl1@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:48:46 -0700, "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
hi
Either you're testing to see if you've returned to my killfile (and
this response is your answer to that.) or you just want to copy my
entire post for those who use Google and don't see x-no archive posts.
I think I'm still x no archived...
Either way, hello.
hi
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "arethusa" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 11:04:01 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:02:03 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net>
wrote:
I think I'm still x no archived...
Duh. No, I'm not. Well, I wasn't.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 11:01:44 PM |
|
|
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:egstg3hps52407p5nsas0tua0fl2ksn7qo@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:02:03 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net>
wrote:
I think I'm still x no archived...
Duh. No, I'm not. Well, I wasn't.
is that you
.
|
|
|
| User: "arethusa" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 11:37:28 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:44 -0700, "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:egstg3hps52407p5nsas0tua0fl2ksn7qo@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:02:03 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net>
wrote:
I think I'm still x no archived...
Duh. No, I'm not. Well, I wasn't.
is that you
I think it's me, but it's possible it's not me at all but rather a
figment of our imagination.
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 11:34:22 PM |
|
|
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:bfutg3lb4l80tsncirf1c8gqgb8nlusqm9@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:44 -0700, "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:egstg3hps52407p5nsas0tua0fl2ksn7qo@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:02:03 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net>
wrote:
I think I'm still x no archived...
Duh. No, I'm not. Well, I wasn't.
is that you
I think it's me, but it's possible it's not me at all but rather a
figment of our imagination.
well let me look at ya ,
'so i can see if its you then
.
|
|
|
| User: "arethusa" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 11:45:44 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:34:22 -0700, "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:bfutg3lb4l80tsncirf1c8gqgb8nlusqm9@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:44 -0700, "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:egstg3hps52407p5nsas0tua0fl2ksn7qo@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:02:03 -0500, arethusa <denise@onlyaret.net>
wrote:
I think I'm still x no archived...
Duh. No, I'm not. Well, I wasn't.
is that you
I think it's me, but it's possible it's not me at all but rather a
figment of our imagination.
well let me look at ya ,
'so i can see if its you then
(^ ^) <-------front view
<) <----------side view, from a distance
( ) <--------------back view
.
|
|
|
| User: "%" |
|
| Title: Re: it's time for this NG |
11 Oct 2007 11:46:26 PM |
|
|
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:eoutg3dj2j56d58o2nmr5jepocsb3foih8@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:34:22 -0700, "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:bfutg3lb4l80tsncirf1c8gqgb8nlusqm9@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:01:44 -0700, "%" <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
"arethusa" <denise@onlyaret.net> wrote in message
news:egstg3hps52407p5nsas0tua0fl2ksn7qo@4ax.com...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:02:03 -0500, arethusa
<denise@onlyaret.net>
wrote:
I think I'm still x no archived...
Duh. No, I'm not. Well, I wasn't.
is that you
I think it's me, but it's possible it's not me at all but rather a
figment of our imagination.
well let me look at ya ,
'so i can see if its you then
(^ ^) <-------front view
<) <----------side view, from a distance
( ) <--------------back view
ok , you're you
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|