neoholistic



 Sociology > Depression > neoholistic

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Sociology > Depression
User: "Franz Bestuchev"
Date: 09 Jan 2004 06:55:32 AM
Object: neoholistic
please post your email address in a form that won't require me to throw
a little perl at it to figure it out because I'm too lazy to think it
through and too lazy for even perl
perhaps a rot13 or a crypt; perhaps there's a unique european/spanish
manner of obfuscation...this could be very cross cultural in that respect
.

User: "neoholistic"

Title: Re: neoholistic 09 Jan 2004 07:16:47 AM
x-no-archive: yes
Franz Bestuchev wrote:

please post your email address in a form that won't require me to throw
a little perl at it to figure it out because I'm too lazy to think it
through and too lazy for even perl

perhaps a rot13 or a crypt; perhaps there's a unique european/spanish
manner of obfuscation...this could be very cross cultural in that respect


Far, far simpler. Oldest and dumbest encryption system in the world, probably.
If you're stuck then it's because you're implicitly assuming that I must be using a clever encryption (I'm not!).
Alistaire was succesful at figuring it out using the following hint:
Think of the alphabet as an ordered set, and apply the rule in my sig.
In your case, maybe it'll help to think of ascii codes...
--
Please keep the 'x-no-archive: yes' header.
To reach me by email: transform my account name like IBM -> HAL.
.
User: "Franz Bestuchev"

Title: Re: neoholistic 09 Jan 2004 07:31:57 AM
neoholistic wrote:

x-no-archive: yes

Franz Bestuchev wrote:

please post your email address in a form that won't require me to throw
a little perl at it to figure it out because I'm too lazy to think it
through and too lazy for even perl

perhaps a rot13 or a crypt; perhaps there's a unique european/spanish
manner of obfuscation...this could be very cross cultural in that respect



Far, far simpler. Oldest and dumbest encryption system in the world,
probably.
If you're stuck then it's because you're implicitly assuming that I must
be using a clever encryption (I'm not!).

Alistaire was succesful at figuring it out using the following hint:
Think of the alphabet as an ordered set, and apply the rule in my sig.
In your case, maybe it'll help to think of ascii codes...

No, I know about the cipher and all (2001, IBM, 666...), just too lazy
and sleep deprived to do it.
So I'm lazy I want something I can just drop into my shell ;)
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER