OK NAP TIME



 Sociology > Depression > OK NAP TIME

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Sociology > Depression
User: "%"
Date: 31 Jan 2008 01:32:51 PM
Object: OK NAP TIME
see ya
.

User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 01:33:49 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

see ya

Have a good one.
--
-slunky
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:02:50 PM
slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

see ya


Have a good one.

i did then i reconnected at 52 bps
look at me go
.
User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:04:46 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

i did then i reconnected at 52 bps
look at me go

Woohoo! I got Win2000 running on the virtual machine, and it works
great! I've even got flash now.
--
-slunky
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:10:56 PM
slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

i did then i reconnected at 52 bps
look at me go


Woohoo! I got Win2000 running on the virtual machine, and it works
great! I've even got flash now.

yay go here and play mad driver
http://www.mostfungames.com/
.
User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:17:20 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

yay go here and play mad driver

http://www.mostfungames.com/

I get errors when I go there, but I'll try to play it anyways. Guess
what else. I have Outlook Express 5 now too.
--
-slunky
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:21:46 PM
slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

yay go here and play mad driver

http://www.mostfungames.com/


I get errors when I go there, but I'll try to play it anyways. Guess
what else. I have Outlook Express 5 now too.

you turned into me
.
User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:30:56 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

you turned into me

Sort of. I've got Win2000. WinME was having problems because I had to
run it in Win98 compatibility.
--
-slunky
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:39:04 PM
slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

you turned into me


Sort of. I've got Win2000. WinME was having problems because I had to
run it in Win98 compatibility.

mines 98 too
.
User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:47:53 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

mines 98 too

Yeah, WinME is based on Win98. Win2000 is based on WinNT.
--
-slunky
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:52:50 PM
slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

mines 98 too


Yeah, WinME is based on Win98. Win2000 is based on WinNT.

i know
.
User: "the_dawggie"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 04:37:36 PM
% wrote:

slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

mines 98 too

Yeah, WinME is based on Win98. Win2000 is based on WinNT.



i know

Ahh, woke up, but now need to go to work :-(
WinNT was a piece of shite in part developed by Dave Cutler
who had no right to steal from DEC.
.

User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:56:39 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

i know

Do you know what XP stands for? I could never figure it out unless it's
one of those smiley things.
--
-slunky
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 03:59:50 PM
slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

i know


Do you know what XP stands for? I could never figure it out unless
it's one of those smiley things.

nope
.
User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 04:02:12 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

nope

Maybe I should ask in a Microsoft group and get totally flamed for not
knowing.
--
-slunky
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 04:06:56 PM
slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

nope


Maybe I should ask in a Microsoft group and get totally flamed for not
knowing.

make something up and say its that ,
and they'll all go nuts telling you what it really is
.
User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 04:10:46 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

make something up and say its that ,
and they'll all go nuts telling you what it really is

Yeah, I'll have to think of something that ties it in with something
really bad, but I can't make it too obvious or they'll know it's
flamebait and ignore me.
--
-slunky
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 04:15:03 PM
slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

make something up and say its that ,
and they'll all go nuts telling you what it really is


Yeah, I'll have to think of something that ties it in with something
really bad, but I can't make it too obvious or they'll know it's
flamebait and ignore me.

tell them they don't know what it means
.
User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 04:16:46 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

tell them they don't know what it means

I'll do that after they tell me what it really means.
--
-slunky
.
User: "%"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 04:20:44 PM
slunky wrote:

_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

tell them they don't know what it means


I'll do that after they tell me what it really means.

we'll both go there and ,
start talking and don't answer anyone else
.
User: "slunky"

Title: Re: OK NAP TIME 31 Jan 2008 04:31:26 PM
_/ % <persent@gmail.com> wrote \_

we'll both go there and ,
start talking and don't answer anyone else

Ok, now what's the group with all the cranky wannabe computer
technicians that used2be found?
--
-slunky
.




















  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER