| Topic: |
Sociology > Depression |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
14 Jan 2008 01:06:46 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Domain For Sale: Auction Airsoft .co .uk |
reviewed his work and called it ~"boring, been there, done
that". As if what they thought of his photos had a damn thing to do with the
matter.
The New York Times then continued to print topless pictures of young girls,
such as on November 10, 1991. They even printed color nipples of young girls
ages 5-8, confident the FBI wasn't going to bust *them*.
How hypocritical and self-serving.
Get a load of this wording:
* "Former Black Panthers Leader Is Freed on Bail"
* By B. Drummond Ayres Jr., The New York Times, June 11, 1997
*
* ...any trial jury is sure to be asked to weigh Mr. Pratt's alleged violent
* excess against the ALLEGED EXCESSES COMMITTED BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IN
* THE 1960's, PARTICULARLY ALLEGED EXCESSES IN SURVEILLANCE AND SUBVERSION
* OF ANTI-GOVERNMENT GROUPS like the Panthers.
Alleged?
I hear The New York Times "alleged" the "Pentagon Papers" were real!
----
The law refers to "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area".
The FBI takes that to mean naked. Obviously.
A poorly written bill, interpreted by predatory pinheads.
Guess what?
1/18/95 NYT: In a case that did not involve nudity or genital visibility,
Attorney General Janet Reno filed a brief with the Supreme Court that
said it was not necessary for a child pornography conviction. That is
how she interprets the language of the bill.
Wow.
And I thought Ed Meese was a bad Attorney General. Meese had written
to companies like the owners of 7-11 and told them selling Playboy and
Penthouse could get them Federal obscenity charges. That was his attempt
to get around the First Amendment.
10/3/96 NYT: Because of
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
